RME 4.3.1 config compare problem

Dears,
I am using LMS 3.2 with RME 4.3.1
And I use config compare function in RME to compare two versions of one device.
When I try to show diff only of two different versions.(You may see the result in attached file)
There is the same line marked as blue(ex:permit IP 172.21.22.46 0.0.0.1 any)
Maybe because this line has been deleted and added before.( I am not sure because these lines were modified by QPM )
But in my opinion, this line should be marked as black since the line is exact the same in both versions.
Is this a bug of RME or it's a normal result?
Thanks for any response.

This looks okay as ACLs are order-sensitive. Just because an ACE is present in two ACLs does not mean the meaning of the ACE is the same in both. RME's config comparison is context-sensitive, so it is telling you that the meaning of these two ACEs is different.

Similar Messages

CiscoWorks Export config compare

I have LMS2.6(RME4.0.6) on Windows. How can I export the Config Diff Viewer - Compare Startup vs. Running configurations screen to a usable file (PDF, CSV, etc)? If I select the Export button in the upper right of the screen, it will only export an XML file to a directory on the server. Please advise.

You can only export to XML. However, you can use cwcli from the command line to do a config compare. For example, to compare config version 1 of 10.1.1.1 to the latest archived version, use the following command:
cwcli config compare -u admin -p admin -device 10.1.1.1 -version 1
This will output the diff in plain text.

HT1430 Iphone 5 OS 6.1.1, When I turn off or restart device, this device automatic unmute. How can i config this problem?

Iphone 5 OS 6.1.1, When I turn off or restart device, this device automatic unmute. How can i config this problem?

Hey everyone in Apple world!
I figured out how to fix the flashing yellow screen problem that I've been having on my MBP! Yessssss!!!
I found this super handy website with the golden answer: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1379
I followed the instructions on this page and here's what I did:
Resetting NVRAM / PRAM
Shut down your Mac.
Locate the following keys on the keyboard: Command (⌘), Option, P, and R. You will need to hold these keys down simultaneously in step 4.
Turn on the computer.
Press and hold the Command-Option-P-R keys before the gray screen appears.
Hold the keys down until the computer restarts and you hear the startup sound for the second time.
Release the keys.
I went through the 6 steps above twice, just to make sure I got rid of whatever stuff was holding up my bootup process. Since I did that, my MBP boots up just like normal. No flashing yellow screen anymore!!
(Note that I arrived at this solution when I first saw this page: http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2570?viewlocale=en_US)
Let me know if this works for you!
Elaine

RME config archive problem - lms 3.2

just wondering if anyone else has seen this.
about a month or so ago, I grabbed about 6 or 7 patches for our ciscoworks machine, across cm, rme, and cs. (yeah, we were a little behind)
after applying these patches, it seems, all of the 2960s and 4948s are failing the config archive with the following:
cm00139: could not archive config:cause: action: verify that device is managed and credentials are correct. Increase timeout
value if required.
so I've triple checked the credential set applied to these devices, adjusted timeout and retry values, and have gotten nowhere.
Deleting these devices doesn't seem to help, they are rediscovered just fine, but the config archive continues to fail.
Other than maybe trying to reinstall the rme patches (or uninstall) that were recently applied, I'm out of ideas. This is LMS 3.2.1 with
cm 5.2.2
cs 3.3.1
rme 4.3.2
running on windows server 08.
So if anyone may have seen this and/or has any advice, I'd appreciate it. Thanks - chris

ok, so it's been a year and a half since last post. So in addition to the above mentioned archive failures with the 4948s, the 4948s were also showing up in config out of sync summary. The only difference that were showing between running and startup was the ntp clock period.
I did see that the clock period statement was in the exclude list for routers and a bunch of other things, but not for the 4948s. I added this as an exclusion yesterday. Today when I checked, all 4948s are archiving now, and are off the out of sync report. Never would have crossed my mind to check there, but that exclusion seems to have done the trick. Maybe someone else can use this if they're seeing the same thing. - chris

RME 4.2 / configuration compare problem

RME always flag the parameters associated with the
banner and all parameters that follows it as a delta between 2 images.
Any clue ?

Could be due to CSCsu99748
http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCsu99748
CSCsu99748 Bug Details
Out of sync on banner when running config fetched by TFTP
Symptom:
Device marked as out of sync even though show start and show run are the same. The diff viewer shows that the difference for the configs are due to multiline banners for "banner exec" and "banner login"
Conditions:
Appears to affect LMS 3.1 only - LMS 3.0.1 and LMS 2.6 have been observed to be unaffected.
Latest running config is fetched using TFTP protocol. Telnet and SSH not affected.
Banners configured for "banner exec" and "banner login". For example:
banner exec "
*****************************TEST*******************************
banner login "
*****************************TEST*******************************
Workaround:
Use telnet or SSH to do fetch the running config instead.
Or, use the exclusion commands to exclude all banner config if the banner is not a necessary config to be monitored.
Status
Fixed
Severity
3 - moderate
Last Modified
In Last Year
Product
CiscoWorks Resource Manager Essentials
Technology
1st Found-In
4.2
Fixed-In
4.2
4.3

LMS 3.2 with RME 4.3.1 backup configuration problem

Hi,
I am faing some problems in backing up devices in the network where it shows errors.
i am trying the to backup configuration for switches
1- WS-C2960-24PC-L with an ip 10.10.x.1 (10.10.11.1, 10.10.12.1, 10.10.14.1,,,,,,,,,,,,,) but it is giving me errors, sometimes it gives:
*** Device Details for 10.10.12.1 ***
Protocol ==> Unknown / Not Applicable
Selected Protocols with order ==> Telnet,TFTP,SSH,RCP,HTTPS
Execution Result:
Unable to get results of job execution for device. Retry the job after increasing
the job result wait time using the option:
Resource Manager Essentials -> Admin -> Config Mgmt -> Archive Mgmt ->Fetch Settings
i have tried to change the fetch setting but it keeps on changing it to default setting.
and another time this output
CM0151 PRIMARY STARTUP Config fetch failed for 10.10.14.1 Cause: TELNET:
Failed to establish TELNET connection to 10.10.14.1 - Cause: Authentication failed on device 3 times.
PRIMARY-STARTUP config Fetch Operation failed for TFTP.
Could not detect SSH protocols running on the device
Failed to fetch config using RCP.Verify RCP is enabled or not.
Action: Check if protocol is supported by device and required device package
is installed. Check device credentials. Increase timeout value, if required.
2- WS-C3560V2-24PS with an ip 10.10.x.2 (10.10.11.2 ,,,,,,) with error that i have to check the dcmaservice.log
3- WS-C2960-48PST-L with an ip 10.0.0.100 with error that i have to check the dcmaservice.log
Note: the switches 3560v2 and 2960-48PST-L are showing as unknown in the DFM although i updated the DFM with the patch
Please find the attach the dcmaservice.log , i was not able to analyz it
Please i appreciate some help.
Regards,
George

Without debugging, it's impossible to say exactly why things are failing. However, based on the errors, I would double-check the DCR credentials for these devices and make absolutely sure you can connect to them using the DCR credentials from the LMS server. You can confirm this by exporting the records for these devices from Common Services > Device and Credentials > Device Management. If SSH should be the protocol that works, also try telneting to the device from the LMS server on TCP port 22. You will get an SSH version string back. Make sure it is one of 1.5, 1.99, or 2.0.
The timeout problem could be symptomatic of another bug. Restarting ConfigMgmtServer (pdterm ConfigMgmtServer/pdexec ConfigMgmtServer) may help. The fact that the job timeout resets to the default means there is a problem with your regdaemon.xml file. If you post this file, I can fix it for you.

TreeSet Comparator problem

I've been working on a pathfinding algorithm and have been using a TreeSet with a custom comparator, but seem to have run into a problem. I'm under the assumption that a set should only contain one of each item based on the comparator. For some reason, when I do certain test cases the TreeSet will contain duplicate values. I specify that the values are equal if x == x and y == y, but somehow multiple x,y pairs are contained in the set. I use TreeSet.conatins() to determine if I should put the item in the list, but for some reason even if they share the same x,y pair it puts the same item in the list. Also, on other test cases its having trouble putting the items in the correct order. A pair of coordinates with a higher F value is in the front of the list when it should be in the back. If anyone has some suggestions i would greatly appreciate it. This is my code for the comparator. Maybe I'm doing something wrong and fresh set of eyes could help. This is my first time working with them and I'm not sure if I've made a tiny mistake or not.
This is the custom comparator class I've implemented
    private class AStarNodeComparator implements Comparator<AStarNode>{
        public int compare(AStarNode o1, AStarNode o2) {
            return (o1.compareTo(o2));
    }And this is the compareTo, equals and hashCode method I've used for my AStarNode
    @Override
    public boolean equals(Object o){
        return(o instanceof AStarNode && this.compareTo((AStarNode)o) == 0);
    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
        int hash = 3;
        hash = 83 * hash + this.x;
        hash = 83 * hash + this.y;
        return hash;
    public int compareTo(AStarNode t) {
        if(this.x == t.getX() && this.y == t.getY()){
            return 0;
        else if(this.f < t.getF()){
            return -1;
        else{
            return 1;
    }If anyone has an idea on why this isn't sorting corectly and why it has duplicate items I would appreciate it.

Would that exclude a value from the tree if the x and y didnt equal but the f values did? Say 1,3 = 110 and 1,2 = 110. Would it exclude one of the coordinates with that final return 0 at the end?No. It's the most minor key. It sorts items with equal (x,y) pairs only.
I'm trying to keep duplicate x,y pairs out and sort them by f values at the same time.That is a contradiction in terms. If they are out how can you sort them? You have a major conceptual confusion here.
Hmm would their be a different data structure I could use that would efficiently let me store them using the x,y coordinates as positions and then find the smallest one?It's not a question of which data structure, it's a question of how you are defining your ordering.
I think your comparator should look like this:
// Major key is 'x'
if (this.x > that.x)
return 1;
if (this.x < that.x)
return -1;
// Sub-major key is 'y'
if (this.y > that.y)
return 1;
if (this.y < that.y)
return -1;
// minor key is 'f'
if (this.f > that.f)
return 1;
if (this.f < that.f)
return -1;
// Everything is equal
return 0;As you are using a TreeSet you can throw away your hashCode() method. Otherwise it should take the 'f' value into account too.

Config archiving problem

Hi
am having problem in archiving config from switches in cisco works. am having problem in only 5 switches all others switch configurations archived when I try to do this I found following error.
TELNET: Failed to establish TELNET connection to 172.25.2.102 - Cause: Authentication failed on device 3 times. PRIMARY-RUNNING config Fetch Operation failed for TFTP. Failed to detect SSH version running on the device. Failed to fetch config using RCP.Connection refused: connect Verify RCP is enabled or not.
can any one help me to fix this
Thanks

Hi
Thanks for that apparently nearly 200 switches are working only 5 switches we have a problem. please see snmp config below. I have added RW recently it is not taking effect. please see screen shot of working one and not working
snmp-server community comms RO
snmp-server community comms RW
snmp-server enable traps snmp authentication linkdown linkup coldstart warmstart
snmp-server enable traps tty
snmp-server enable traps fru-ctrl
snmp-server enable traps entity
snmp-server enable traps cpu threshold
snmp-server enable traps vtp
snmp-server enable traps vlancreate
snmp-server enable traps vlandelete
snmp-server enable traps flash insertion removal
snmp-server enable traps port-security
snmp-server enable traps envmon fan shutdown supply temperature status
snmp-server enable traps license
snmp-server enable traps config-copy
snmp-server enable traps config
snmp-server enable traps hsrp
snmp-server enable traps bridge newroot topologychange
snmp-server enable traps stpx inconsistency root-inconsistency loop-inconsistency
snmp-server enable traps syslog
snmp-server enable traps vlan-membership
snmp-server host 172.16.25.12 comms
snmp-server host 172.16.25.13 comms

String compare problem

I try to compare 2 strings with compareTo/equalTo, but it's not working, those 2 funcs always return ture.
public boolean chMark(String name, String test, String newMark)
          boolean flag = false;
          for(int i = 0; i < course.getNumOfStd(); i++)
               if(course.getStd().getName().compareTo(name)==0)//here is problem;
                    Student tempStd = course.getStd()[i];
                    for(int j = 0; j < tempStd.getMark().getNumOfTests(); j++)
                    if(tempStd.getMark().getTestArray()[j].getTitle().compareTo(test)==0);//here is problem;
                         int mark = Integer.parseInt(newMark);                    }
          return flag;
Can anybody tell me why?
REGARDS,
Elton

equals() would read more naturally than compareTo()==0. But, in
either case, use System.out.println() to write the two strings before
you compare them. This is to check that you are comparing what
you think you're comparing.System.out.println("name from course is " + course.getStd().getName());
System.out.println("name is " + name);
if(course.getStd()[i].getName().compareTo(name)==0)//here is problem;
System.out.println("name from couse and name compared equal");
// etc

CSS Config Syncing problem 8.10

When I sync two CSSs running virtual router redundancy with "script play commit_vip_redundancy", I get an error about the remote unit not having the virtual IP configured.
If I try add the IP to the circuit (ip redundant-vip) on the backup CSS manually first, I get an error that the content rule does not exist.
So currently I'm pasting the config into the devices separately, which is time consuming. Only after the config is present on the 2nd unit can I replicate changes using the specified script.
I am running ver 8.10 software. Any solutions to the problem?
Related to the above, is there an easy way to switch over to box-box redundancy from VIP, keeping in mind that the configuration is over 4000 lines long with hundreds of services and content rules?

First, I would not recommend to switch over to box-to-box redundancy.
You have better failover response time with vip redundancy.
Regarding your issue, I would suggest to open a service request with the TAC.
Provide your config and the output of "script play commit_vip_redundancy -d"
We need to investigate this and submit a bug if necessary.
Gilles.

Comparable problem with eclipse

I want to use "Comparable" in eclipse, but always has a problem with a steatment that " The type Comparable is not generic; it cannot be parameterized with arguments <Node>".
program is here:
public class Node implements Comparable<Node>
     public int value;
     public boolean LeftchildSent; //used for checking if leftchild sent the value to the node at last round
     public boolean RightchildSent; //...
     public boolean ParentSent; //...
     //constructor
     public Node(int value, boolean LeftchildSent, boolean RightchildSent, boolean ParentSent, Node left, Node right)
          this.value = value;
          this.LeftchildSent = false;
          this.RightchildSent = false;
          this.ParentSent = false;
     //implements comparable
     public int ComparableTo(Node n)
          if(value < n.value) return -1;
          if(value == n.value) return 0;
          if(value > n.value) return 1;
}anybody help, thanks very much

Be sure to:
1- Use a JRE System Library 5.0+ for your project.
(Properties / Java Build Path / Libraries)
2- Use a compiler compliance level 5.0+ for your project.
(Properties / Java Compiler / Compiler Compliance Level)
3- Change your last method to:    public int compareTo(Node n) // *** bad name used
        if(value < n.value) return -1;
        if(value > n.value) return 1;
        return 0; // *** be sure to have a return statement
    }or better:     public int compareTo(Node n)
        return value - n.value;
    }

ASP Website - Web Config provider problem with EF4 / Sql Server Compact 4.0

I am setting up a website which will exchange data with remote Windows Desktop applications and am using SQLCE4.0 and EF4.0 to upload and deserialize an entity to the database with the following code:
Using dc As ContribDataEntities = New ContribDataEntities
   Dim sc As SaleComp = ByteToCSC(comp)
   dc.SaleComps.Add(sc) <-- Exception occurs here
   dc.SaveChanges()
End Using
The exception I get is:
System.Data.Entity.Core.MetadataException was unhandled by user code
HResult=-2146232007
Message=Schema specified is not valid. Errors:
App_Code.ContribData.ssdl(2,2) : error 0152: No Entity Framework provider found for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlServerCe.4.0'. Make sure the provider is registered in the 'entityFramework' section of the application config file.
See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information.
Source=EntityFramework
I do not see an entity framework section in my Web.Config, but SqlServerCe.4.0 appears to be there.
Any ideas? Thanks.
-BGood

Thanks, ErikEJ.
Deleting and re-installing the NuGet packages got around the metadata exception, but I am now having a new problem relating to my DateTime database columns. This is described in a separate thread:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/59befc98-bbd0-4b1a-93a0-f32c94a53b1b/overflow-when-saving-datetime-data-type-in-sql-server-compact-40-with-ef4?forum=sqlce
-BGood

CiscoWorks-Config collection problem

Hi,
I have configured config collection on Cisco Works. But only one device's configuration has been succesfully collected, rest of the devices are showing failed.
check the log...showing telnet authentication failed 3 times. but I have checked the username and password configured on Cisco Works is perfect even the same username and password configured on the device, which configuration collection succeded.
Please give me some troubleshooting process so I can fix the issue.

yes..I have checked so many times...and username / password is ok....but still I am not able to fix the problem.....It the username and password is configured wrong , then it should work for one device,,,because the username and password is configured in Tacacs Server and same for all devices.

CVS Compare Problem

Hello,
I'm using JDev 10.1.0.3.4.3673 and CVSNT2.0.8
When I try to compare a file with another revision, the left filter defaults to the previous revision, and the right filter defaults to the head revision, but underneath the two filters where I expect to see the two source files and the differences from the comparison I just see a white background with the message 'Compare Not Available'.
Does anybody have any suggestions how to solve this? Am I doing something wrong? This is really a show stopper for me.
JFYI If I use the feature 'Compare With Other File', it works as expected. But of course my goal is to compare with other CVS revisions to see what changes a colleague has made.

Thanks again for your help.
I see this problem on all files that I try to compare from CVS. Below is the ouput from 'cvs log' from the command prompt for an example file. The date format is exactly as you described:
RCS file: /local/reps/acc-dm/measdb/measdb-client-api/src/java/cern/measurement/MeasurementManager.java,v
Working file: MeasurementManager.java
head: 1.10
branch:
locks: strict
access list:
symbolic names:
V2_0_1: 1.10
V2_0_0: 1.10
V1_5_14: 1.9
V1_5_13: 1.9
V1_5_12: 1.9
V1_5_11: 1.9
V1_5_10: 1.7
V1_5_9: 1.6
V1_5_8: 1.6
V1_5_7: 1.6
V1_5_6: 1.6
V1_5_5: 1.6
V1_5_4: 1.6
V1_5_3: 1.5
V1_5_2: 1.5
V1_5_1: 1.5
V1_5_0: 1.4
V1_4_0: 1.3
V1_3_0: 1.2
V1_2_1: 1.1.1.1
V1_2_0: 1.1.1.1
V1_1_0: 1.1.1.1
V1_0_1: 1.1.1.1
V1_0: 1.1.1.1
arelease: 1.1.1.1
avendor: 1.1.1
keyword substitution: kv
total revisions: 11; selected revisions: 11
description:
revision 1.10
date: 2006-06-08 15:06:32 +0000; author: konkere; state: Exp; lines: +172 -107; commitid: lnQP1pTMGnOrhdAr;
JMON-52.
Refactoring to generalize the fundamental and measurement variable behaviour and handling
revision 1.9
date: 2006-04-07 09:57:02 +0000; author: cdroderi; state: Exp; lines: +76 -16; commitid: AiECvh7J3qGRydsr;
New Fundamental Variable Features, and SavedVariableList for integration with
Set Of The Day.
revision 1.8
date: 2006-01-25 18:19:54 +0000; author: cdroderi; state: Exp; lines: +3 -4;
Added additional debug information to verify clearing of timeseries data
revision 1.7
date: 2006-01-17 14:33:53 +0000; author: cdroderi; state: Exp; lines: +29 -0;
[no comments]
revision 1.6
date: 2005-09-15 20:12:15 +0000; author: cdroderi; state: Exp; lines: +0 -0;
[no comments]
revision 1.5
date: 2005-09-12 08:01:07 +0000; author: cdroderi; state: Exp; lines: +2 -2;
Extended MetaVariableSet extraction using MetaHierarchy to include all nodes under the node represented by the given hierarchy.
revision 1.4
date: 2005-08-30 21:13:04 +0000; author: cdroderi; state: Exp; lines: +24 -3;
Limited the variable ownership and registration checks to once per session unless variables are added or removed from a variable set.
revision 1.3
date: 2005-08-30 14:25:10 +0000; author: cdroderi; state: Exp; lines: +50 -3;
New methods to read MetaVariableSet objects using a given MetaVariable name pattern or MetaHierarchy to filter the size of the returned set.
revision 1.2
date: 2005-08-23 14:16:25 +0000; author: cdroderi; state: Exp; lines: +19 -15;
Bug fix for writing data for variables with no time series data. Merge data when duplicates are found.
revision 1.1
date: 2005-06-01 17:52:43 +0000; author: cdroderi; state: Exp;
branches: 1.1.1;
Initial revision
revision 1.1.1.1
date: 2005-06-01 17:52:43 +0000; author: cdroderi; state: Exp; lines: +0 -0;
no message
=============================================================================

TreeSet and Comparator problem

Hi all ,
I am using jdk1.3 , jbuilder4.0 , Apache Tomcat 1.3.14 and Window 98 and Access Database.
I have comparator code below which give me some problem
public int compare(Object x, Object y) {
CompanyJB a = (CompanyJB)x , b = (CompanyJB)y;
double aMinratio = a.getMinratio();
double bMinratio = b.getMinratio();
int aCompid = a.getCompanyid();
int bCompid = b.getCompanyid();
String aRankstr = a.getRank();
String bRankstr = b.getRank();
int tmp;
tmp = new Integer(aCompid).compareTo(new Integer(bCompid));
if (tmp == 0) {
return tmp;
tmp = a.getRank().compareTo(b.getRank());
if (tmp !=0) {
return tmp;
tmp = new Double(a.getMinratio()).compareTo(new Double(b.getMinratio()));
if (tmp !=0) {
return tmp;
return new Double(a.getMinratio()).compareTo(new Double(b.getMinratio()));
Client source code below :
TreeSet list2 = new TreeSet(new test());
//list2.add(new test(2,1.9,4.2,"NA")); // 1
list2.add(new test(11,8.5,8.5,"2")); // 3
list2.add(new test(1,0.6,0.6,"NA")); // 2
list2.add(new test(11,2.5,2.3,"NA")); // 4
list2.add(new test(12,0.3,0.3,"1")); // 5
list2.add(new test(2,1.9,1.2,"NA"));
list2.add(new test(12,0.9,0.9,"NA"));
Iterator iterator2 = list2.iterator();
while(iterator2.hasNext()){
System.out.println(((test)iterator2.next()).getCompanyid());
My problem is that the print out display duplicate company id "12" in the set.
It should not display the duplicate company id in the set.
What is the problem here ?? Anybody have ideas ??

Actually, a Set, as defined in java.util.Set, should not contain duplicate members. With SortedSets, however, there must also be consistency between equals() and the compareTo() (or Comparator.compare()). In other words, equal objects must sort to the same or an adjacent place in order for the Set semantics to work.
In your example, "equal" objects can appear in completely different positions in the sort order, throwing off this consistency. When adding, it's traversing the tree in Rank,MinRatio order. If by chance it runs across a node that has the same company id, it stops and leaves the trees alone (as it does with id=11). If you try graphing the tree out by hand using your compare() as left/right criteria (negative left, positive right, 0 don't change), it'll become immediately clear what's happening.
Also of interest: you'll find that you can't add test(34,1.9,1.2,"NA") to the list: because it's Rank and MinOrder is the same as the id=2 entry, it'll never get added.

RME 4.3.1 config compare problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for