Roaming from Cisco AP1242 to Intemec AP2100

Hello all,
Currently our warehouse and manufacturing environment consists of Intermec 2100 802.11 b AP's our intensions are to slowly migrate to Cisco 1242 AP for future VOIP applications. Our question is will there by any problems with roaming between the two manufactures and if so how can we resolve these issues. We cannot replace all the AP?s at once because of our 24/7 operation.

Thanks for the extra info; it helps!
The short version first; I believe you'll be OK with the one-for-one swapout (of course, try a pilot in the least-used area first).
The details:
Since you are using WEP and different vendors, your best friend here for roaming will be IAPP (Inter-Access Point Protocol). This is a protocol to hand off traffic from one AP to another during the roam. IAPP should be fast enough for pure data traffic. It *may be* fast enough for voice, but I'm betting it'll be spotty, at best.
It would be good to investigate whether your Intermec APs support it, and that it is enabled. I believe it is a standard function for most resonably recent (~coule years) APs. If you still have contact with the Intermec folks, check with them to see that your current images include IAPP support.
The other possible issues I'd keep an eye out for are:
* The antennas you choose for your Cisco APs. Since you have a good site survey, and it seems to be working for you, try to choose antennas for the Cisco that have the same coverage, gain, and pattern as the Intermec APs. If you have an aea that is a little weak, then check out some of the other antennas with higher gain or a better-suited pattern. If there's a doubt, go with the higher gain or broader pattern ... it's easy enough to drop the power at the AP.
* Once you have a/some pilot unit(s) in place, check the switch that connects the Intermec and the Cisco APs; OCCASIONALLY there are some issues with the switch not recognizing the roam fast enough (or the old AP doesn't drop the association fast enough), and the switch will report "flapping" because it will see the same client/MAC at two ports. We mostly have seen this with Cisco 6500s and another (non-Intermec) AP /client.
* If you're using POE to power the APs, verify the POE config. Before it was a standard, Cisco used a proprietary POE scheme (as did everyone else with a POE-capable AP). I believe the newer APs are POE standards compliant (brain fart, I don't remember). So, depending on your current setup, you may need to also use Cisco power injectors, or a Cisco-compliant injector panel.
Now would be a good time to study-up on Cisco Central Key Management (CCKM), TKIP, and Cisco's flavor of WDS.
CCKM may be something that will help with the seamless roaming for the voice clients.
TKIP will permit dynamic rotating keys to bump your security up a notch.
(Cisco)WDS is a method to get the clients rapidly re-authenticate at the new AP as part of the roam process.
I'm sure Rob and the others will jump in with some additional tips and advice. Many of the other folks posting here are managing large campus systems and can speak from direct, recent experience.
Good Luck
Scott

Similar Messages

  • When roaming from AP to AP - is reassociation supported?

    When roaming from Apple Express access point to another Apple Express access point - is reassociation supported? How about in other Apple access point models?
    I realize that this is not defined in 802.11 and therefore is vendor implementaiton dependant in the access point, and that most SOHO level access points do not support reassociation - whereas enterprise level products (Cisco, etc.) do support the capability.
    Thanks

    No, reassociation does not require a RADIUS server. Cisco's Fast Reassociation is an advanced reassociation feature than does interact with a RADIUS server.
    The feature I am asking of occurs when a client roams from AP1 to AP2, a reassociation (rather than a standard reassociation request) occurs from the client to AP2. AP2 then, over the wire, goes to AP1 and picks up any buffered data for the client and passes it to the client. This enables a better roaming experience by ensuring buffered data is not lost or have to be resent/retried by a upper layer protocol.
    As I said, the inter AP communication portion of this is not defined by 802.11 and is vendor implementation specific - if implemented at all. I am wanting to know if any Apple Airport access points have this capability implemented.

  • What I would like from Cisco is the meaning of all level 3 or lower email messages my Router can send to me. So, that I can take the appropriate actions.

    v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
    o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
    w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
    .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-qformat:yes;
    mso-style-parent:"";
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin-top:0in;
    mso-para-margin-right:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;
    mso-para-margin-left:0in;
    line-height:115%;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:11.0pt;
    font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
    mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
    mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
    mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
    My Small Business Router has been sending me email messages. This is a RVS-4000 version 1.
    I just want to understand what my Router is emailing me or telling me...
    The last message I received from my RVS-4000 was:
       Oct 30 13:44:09 - IPSEC EVENT: KLIPS device ipsec0 shut down.
    IPSEC EVENT sounds important. Whatever it is... And what is a KLIPS device ipsec0 shutdown????
    I have Log Levels 0-3 selected...
    Log Level
    Setting which level log Router should recorder. Level from 0 ~ 7 means:
    0: LOG_EMERG(system is unusable)
    1: LOG_ALERT(action must be taken immediately)
    2: LOG_CRIT(critical conditions)
    3: LOG_ERR(error conditions)
    4: LOG_WARNING(warning conditions)
    5: LOG_NOTICE(normal, but significant, condition)
    6: LOG_INFO(informational message)
    7: LOG_DEBUG(debug-level message)
    So, when I get any messages... I'm a little concerned. Because the RVS-4000 thinks it's an Error or better.
    What I would like from Cisco is the meaning of all level 3 or lower email messages my Router can send to me. So, that I can take the appropriate actions.
    I know Cisco inhered these Small Business Routers. When they bought Linksys. However, they have not discontinued them totally and they are still for sale. And Cisco has released a new version 2 of the same Router. So I believe Cisco should support them as well.
    Yes, I'm a pain to Cisco. However, I think you understand I'm being scared by my Routers messages to me... And would like some relief.
    Bruce

    Great suggestions. Problems is this is not the forum for your "wish list" as Apple does not read these USER forums.
    Send your feedback to http://www.apple.com/feedback/iphone.html

  • I need to setup 7800 Series IP Phones in the CUCM 8.6.2 which by default are not support but will work after install the software. Anyone have document from Cisco as I remember I seen once before.

    I need to setup 7800 Series IP Phones in the CUCM 8.6.2 which by default are not support but will work after install the software. Anyone have document from Cisco as I remember I seen once before.

    Hi Ali,
    I'll just add this reference to the good tips from my friend Manish (+5)
    Support for the 7800 series in CUCM 8.6.2 was first added with this
    Device Pack;
    Cisco Unified Communications Manager
    Device Package 8.6(2)(24104-1)Release Notes
    Cisco Unified Communications Manager Device Package Release 8.6(2)
    adds support for the Cisco IP Phones
    7821, 7841, and 7861 running SIP firmware release 10.1(1).
    The steps are in this doc
    http://www.cisco.com/web/software/282074299/107528/cmterm-devicepack-8.6.2.24104-1_Readme.pdf
    You might as well install the latest 8.6.2 Device pack
    cmterm-devicepack8.6.2.24112-1.cop.sgn
    Cheers!
    Rob
    "Seek it out and ye shall find  " 
    - OneRepublic

  • What's wrong? Verify and compare Cisco 2901 config after loading old config from Cisco 2801

    Hi Cisco Community / Friends,
    I am new to this site though I have cisco account for many years. I am a CCNA ,I  passed my certification on January 2013 I seldom use and utilized my skills on networking becuase of my type of work. I am Project Eng'r working in a System integrator company . Anyway, I would like to ask assistance on the configurations of my Cisco router for this gov't projects.. Here's the situation.
    We have a new project for the VSAT Comm'n of  Coast Watch Station ,  The VSAT was installed 7 years ago. The VSAT was only used for a year by this Gov't agency because of  subscription issue. Now, they wants to revive and use their VSAT facilities for the Coast watch monitoring. Now, some of this routers are working up to now and for some site  are already defective so I need to replace the old 2801 router with a new equivalent model which is Cisco 2901. My plan was just to load the old config into the new Cisco 2901 router. However, after loading it to the new router, I am a little worried because I've got some errors received. I load the old config by copying the old files, edit it in notepad, and load the config using Secure CRT (terminal emulator). When I copy the old config of cisco 2801 to new router cisco 2901 , below are the command not recognized on Cisco 2901. What's wrong ? What are these commands for? 
    Appreciate your comments and help on this matter.. Thank You very much
    Note: I Attached the original config from Cisco 2801 and the other file is the config after I load the config file to Cisco 2901.
    (Errors see below)
    CWS_4_Pandami(config-erm)#mmi polling-interval 60
                                                           ^
    % Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
    CWS_4_Pandami(config-erm)#no mmi auto-configure
                                                           ^
    % Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
    CWS_4_Pandami(config-erm)#no mmi pvc
                                                           ^
    % Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
    CWS_4_Pandami(config-erm)#mmi snmp-timeout 180
                                                            ^
    % Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
    CWS_4_Pandami(config-if)#interface GigabitEthernet0/1
    CWS_4_Pandami(config-if)# description ===CWS4 SAT Modem===
    CWS_4_Pandami(config-if)# bandwidth 256
    CWS_4_Pandami(config-if)# ip address 192.168.42.1 255.255.255.0
    CWS_4_Pandami(config-if)# duplex auto
    CWS_4_Pandami(config-if)# speed auto
    CWS_4_Pandami(config-if)# priority-group 1
                                                        ^
    % Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
    CWS_4_Pandami(config)#access-list 100 permit ip any any dscp cs5
    CWS_4_Pandami(config)#priority-list 1 protocol ip high list 100
                                                    ^
    % Invalid input detected at '^' marker.

    Hi
    From Cisco's website:
    The Modem Management Interface (MMI) is software that enables auto-provisioning for the Cisco 827 routers. The MMI uses a fixed PVC to communicate with the Proxy Element (PE) residing on the digital subscriber line access multiplexer (DSLAM). Using MMI, the Cisco 827 router updates the running image and downloads the prescribed configuration using a configuration file or configuration values in a provisioning information database.
    The customer premise equipment (CPE) can be automatically configured using the Cisco DSL CPE download, but it can be configured only with the image provisioning feature.
    So because this is your device, you don't want to use MMI anyways.
    And "priority-list" is QoS. Probably that QoS-command is old and removed, because now QoS is configured using class-maps and policy-maps.

  • No ringback from cisco ip phones to alcatel Phones

    I have a CUCM 7.1.3 integrated with a Alcatel OXO PBX and when a try to place a call from cisco IP-Phones registered on CUCM to phones on PBX, I have no ringback,but  when a place a call from cisco IP-Phones registered on CUCM to PSTN using PBX as it has a PRI line to the local PSTN, I dont have that issue.
    The voice gateway connects to PBX using a PRI(E1) running MGCP and QSIG.
    interface Serial 3/1:15
    no ip address
    encapsulation hdlc
    isdn switch-type primary-qsig
    isdn timer T310 120000
    isdn protocol-emulate network
    isdn incoming-voice voice
    isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager
    no cdp enable

    You can configure COS values for the Cisco IP Phones so that the voice packets from Cisco IP phone are given more priority over the data packets from the PCs/Hosts. But the same might not be configurable for non Cisco IP Phone. I am not very sure of this. Other than that I guess, you can have all QoS features.

  • ISE failed to update resource from Cisco

    Guys,
    I try to update the client provisioning from cisco.com but it failed (print screen can see in attachment). I try from Cisco ISE, it can ping www.cisco.com.
    Do you have any idea ?

    Hi rizalferdiyan,
    Can you please check the certificate store of ISE for the following certificate :
    Baltimore CyberTrust Root.
    If this certificate is not available you will not be able to download the resources from cisco.com site.

  • Upgrade from Cisco 7.1 to 10.5

    Hello,
    We are planning an upgrade with a customer from Call Manager 7.1 to 10.5, to do this without impact i have a plan in mind. Could you guys check if this is correct, since we will be moving from a MCS to an UCS
    - Install UCS in staging Lab (prepare the esxi etc etc)
    - Do a backup of the current call manager (7.1)
    - Deploy the 7.1 call manager to the new UCS (ISO from cisco website)
    - Do a restore to have all the configuration on the staging Lab
    - In the staging lab perform the upgrade
    I would do this for Call Manager & also Unity, this shouldn't pose any problems?
    Kind Regards,
    Yannick Vranckx

    Hi ,
    You can use PCD for migrating from MCS to UCS.
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/unified-communications/unified-communications-manager-callmanager/118318-config-cucm-00.html
    regds,
    aman

  • L2tpv3 dialing from cisco router

    I have requirement where customer wants ip dialing to LNS from cisco router with the help of l2tpv3.
    Could anyone tell me how to configure this.
    regards
    shivlu jain

    Hello Shivlu,
    in one of our routers the backup link is configured in this way
    pseudowire-class netvision-l2tp
    encapsulation l2tpv2
    interface Virtual-PPP1
    description NETVISION DIALER
    ip address negotiated
    ip nat outside
    ip virtual-reassembly
    no cdp enable
    ppp pap sent-username password 0 41003827
    pseudowire x.x.x.x 2 pw-class netvision-l2tp
    crypto map VPN_MAP
    where x.x.x.x is a public ip address
    ip route x.x.x.x 255.255.255.255 g0/1
    completes this solution where this g0/1
    sh run int gi0/1
    Building configuration...
    Current configuration : 157 bytes
    interface GigabitEthernet0/1
    description CONNECTION TO CABLE MODEM
    ip address dhcp
    ip virtual-reassembly
    duplex auto
    speed auto
    media-type rj45
    end
    and it receives a private ip address from DHCP on a cable modem access network.
    but it uses l2tpv2 not L2tpv3 and I've always seen l2tpv2 in this context.
    Hope to help
    Giuseppe

  • Upgrading from cisco LMS 3.0 to a latest version

    Hello,
    Upgrading from cisco LMS 3.0 to a higher version.
    Whatdoes it require?.
    What is the current version?
    What do we need for upgrading?
    Are there specific codes or new need to buy new products?
    In case of buying new products, which are the configurations?

    H Malik,
    You are correct! Latest version is Cisco prime LMS 4.2. There is no direct upgrade from LMS 3.x to LMS 4.x.
    The procedure is simple:
    Take backup orf old LMS --> Un-install (if same machine)--> Install new LMS --> Restore backup to get old data.
    You would need to purchase new license for it.Cisco Prime LMS is now part of the Cisco Prime Infrastructure bundle and is not orderable separately. Cisco Prime Infrastructure bundle follows a size-based incremental licensing model. Device licenses can be combined and added when applied to a single server installation instance. Customers have the option of adding incremental licenses for additional devices as their network grows.Refer to the Cisco Prime Infrastructure Ordering Guide located at http://www.cisco.com/go/primeinfrastructure for the exact part number that matches your requirement and placing the order.
    Currently even SmartNet or SAS contracts does not cover major upgrades from LMS 2.x and 3.x; an upgrade part number will need to be purchased to move to Cisco Prime LMS 4.2. These upgrade part numbers reflect a significant discount to protect customers' investment in the Cisco Prime product line.
    The data migration process will vary depending on the LMS version from which the data need to be migrated. Migrating data to LMS 4.2:
    • LMS 4.2 supports local upgrade or direct inline upgrade only from LMS 4.0.1 and LMS 4.1.
    • LMS 4.0 customers are encouraged to install LMS 4.0.1 before doing inline upgrade to LMS 4.2.
    • LMS 3.2 and LMS 3.2 Service Pack 1 customers can do a remote upgrade through the LMS backup and restore mechanism.
    • LMS 3.1, LMS 3.0, LMS 3.0 December 2007 Update, LMS 2.6, and LMS 2.6 Service Pack 1 customers need to do a remote upgrade to LMS 4.0.1 and then upgrade to LMS 4.2.
    -Thanks
    Vinod

  • Collecting logs from Cisco Prime Infrastructure

    Hi ,
    I am currently working in integrating  Cisco Prime Infrastruture with the siem tool Qradar.
    Can any one help me out in below issues:
    1)How and where is the log stored in Cisco Prime.?
    2)Does the logs contains the logs of the devices that Cisco Prime manages?
    3)Is there any way to sent out the logs from Cisco Prime to a third party device.?

    Hi,
    1)How and where is the log stored in Cisco Prime.?
    /opt/CSCOlumnos/logs
    2)Does the logs contains the logs of the devices that Cisco Prime manages?
    AFAIK,
    In the prime infrastructure Syslogs are directly read from udp port 514 and then filtered
    , the non SEV1 and SEV2 syslogs will be dropped and will not be entered into db . The
    syslog messages will not be saved into log files .
    Till now PI support only SEV 0,1 and 2 syslog.
    3)Is there any way to sent out the logs from Cisco Prime to a third party device.?
    unfortunately , this feature is not there in PI so far.
    Thanks-
    Afroz
    ***Ratings Encourages Contributors ****

  • Can we download ISE Pofile Policy from Cisco?

    The ISE comes with certain  profile policies. Can we download the profile policy from Cisco as new devices come into the market?

    Yes, you can.  jan.nielson is correct that the Profile Feed Service will allow for this.  Be advised that the Feed Service does require a Plus license for activation.  Here is a snippet from the ISE 1.3 Admin Guide:
    To activate the Feed Service, go to Administration > Feed Service > Profiler.  Enable the checkbox for Enable Profiler Feed Service, fill out the rest of the options (optional) and click Save.
    Please Rate Helpful posts and mark this question as answered if, in fact, this does answer your question.  Otherwise, feel free to post follow-up questions.
    Charles Moreton

  • Device Alert from Cisco LMS

    Hi All,
    I am currently getting buried in a flurry of alerts from Cisco LMS. However when I check on the device in fault manager or with Device Diagnostic Tools, I do not see any issues. Anyone have any ideas as to why these alerts are being generated? ( I have removed our specific info with xxxx)
    Additionally, I don't want to seem like I am bashing the LMS product, but could these alerts be made any more cryptic?
    ALERT ID                = 00001LI
    TIME                    = Wed 24-Mar-2010 01:21:49 GMT-06:00
    STATUS                  = Active
    SEVERITY                = Critical
    MANAGED OBJECT          = xxxx
    MANAGED OBJECT TYPE     = Switches and Hubs
    EVENT DESCRIPTION       = xxxx: Cisco Configuration Management Trap:InformAlarm; xxxx [xxxx]:Unresponsive;
    ALERT ID                = 00001LI
    TIME                    = Wed 24-Mar-2010 06:54:37 GMT-06:00
    STATUS                  = Active
    SEVERITY                = Critical
    MANAGED OBJECT          = xxxx
    MANAGED OBJECT TYPE     = Switches and Hubs
    EVENT DESCRIPTION       = xxxx: STP Topology Change:MinorAlarm; xxxx [xxxx]:Unresponsive;
    ALERT ID                = 00001LI
    TIME                    = Wed 24-Mar-2010 13:13:16 GMT-06:00
    STATUS                  = Active
    SEVERITY                = Critical
    MANAGED OBJECT          = xxxx
    MANAGED OBJECT TYPE     = Switches and Hubs
    EVENT DESCRIPTION       = xxxx: vlanTrunkPortDynamicStatusChange Trap:InformAlarm; xxxx [xxxx]:Unresponsive;
    ALERT ID                = 00001LI
    TIME                    = Wed 24-Mar-2010 13:13:52 GMT-06:00
    STATUS                  = Active
    SEVERITY                = Critical
    MANAGED OBJECT          = xxxx
    MANAGED OBJECT TYPE     = Switches and Hubs
    EVENT DESCRIPTION       = xxxx: STP Topology Change:MinorAlarm; ess016184.casino.sk.ca: vlanTrunkPortDynamicStatusChange Trap:InformAlarm; xxxx[xxxx]:Unresponsive;
    ALERT ID                = 00001LI
    TIME                    = Wed 24-Mar-2010 14:05:49 GMT-06:00
    STATUS                  = Active
    SEVERITY                = Critical
    MANAGED OBJECT          = xxxx
    MANAGED OBJECT TYPE     = Switches and Hubs
    EVENT DESCRIPTION       = xxxx: vlanTrunkPortDynamicStatusChange Trap:InformAlarm; xxxx: STP Topology Change:MinorAlarm; xxxx [xxxx]:Unresponsive;
    Thanks,
    Rick

    The alerts are quite generic.  The individual EVENT details will contain many more details.  Initially, it looks like DFM is showing you trap information relating to config  and STP changes.  If you have determined that these are not important, then you can clear the events (or mark them as acknowledged).  If you're receiving these as notifications (e.g. email notifications), you might consider creating event sets to filter the events to just the ones in which you are interested, then unchecking the boxes for alerts in your Notification Group.

  • Best Setup? Daisy Chain WPN824N from Cisco e2000 N Router or use Netgear 600

    *NOTE* Two things I'm thinking about as I write this... 802.11 N @ 5 GHZ (2 different approaches) not faster than G @ 2.4 and could I lose strength chaining a G and N router vs. one dual band router... Also, I think I'm answering my own question as I write this... :rolleyes:)
    I appreciate any advice!!! I originally setup the WPN824N dedicated to G @ 2.4 GHZ chained from Cisco E2000 dedicated to N @ 5 GHZ. (So $150 already here).
    I picked up a Netgear 600 on a whim 2 days ago ($85 and could return). Of course BB told me I'd get a stronger signal and better streaming from this to all devices (most important to me is Apple TV and IPad, but I only use it for free Netflix 99% of the time and I don't believe you get many Hi-Def options). Thinking about it, can the 600 actually operate a full speed N network while supplying G? Does it drop to lowest speed like some? Again, BB told me it would send N speed and G speed simultaneously... Odd for $85???
    Here's what I'm running...
    1) Hardwired PC as a backup and Media Server (Itunes & DVD Burner)
    2) Two T61 Lenovo Laptops (Win 7) - 802.11 G - General Use
    3) Ipad - Sometimes Netflix, Pandora, etc. - 802.11 N 5GHZ (Near full strength signal but short distances - normal with 5 GHZ)
    4) Apple TV - 802.11 N - Full Signal Strength  (80% streaming - 50' through cabinet and one wall; 20% hardwired)
    5) Ipod Touch 4 - Pandora, Web Surfing, Apps
    6) Iphone 4 - Pandora, Web, Apps
    Speed tests appear to be staying steady between the two different router setups; the Ipad, Iphone and Ipod with 11 - 12 Mbps and the laptops with 20 Mbps coming from a Comcast 20 Mbps line. I tried the upgrade to the 30 Mbps line and experienced no improvement.
    Specifically, with only a 20 Mbps line should I expect to lose speed and/or signal strength in a chained setup vs the one dual band router?
    If so, is it odd the dual band router isn't faster than chained with current settings. Maybe the 600 needs tweeked?
    I don't mind keeping the 600 if it could truly make a difference but after a day and a half, I don't believe I'm seeing a difference. There could be a number of other factors that I'm missing, so that is the real meat of the question. Aside from simplicity, are there other things I should consider before going back to the chained setup?
    Surprisingly, the cheap 824N maintains a strong, consistent signal and speed. However, I'm not seeing any improvement in speed from the dedicated Cisco Router for N @ 5 GHZ like I had expected. I thought N capable devices would really benefit from removing so much interference. I'm in a Condo and the devices consistently see the same 6 or so networks. Net Stumbler shows about 16 networks, almost all 2.4 GHZ G networks.
    My thinking was the Netgear 600 could possibly produce a strong, faster signal to both G and N devices. It seems odd to me that the laptops max out the 20 Mbps download but neither setup pushes the Apple devices past an average of 12 Mbps, especially the Ipad.
    Please share your thoughts on this. I'm getting OCD over this and I'm tired of deciphering and trying to tie together information "close" to my questions but none of them specific to what I'm looking for.
    Thank you!!!!!
    Brad

    *NOTE* Two things I'm thinking about as I write this... 802.11 N @ 5 GHZ (2 different approaches) not faster than G @ 2.4 and could I lose strength chaining a G and N router vs. one dual band router... Also, I think I'm answering my own question as I write this... :rolleyes:)
    I appreciate any advice!!! I originally setup the WPN824N dedicated to G @ 2.4 GHZ chained from Cisco E2000 dedicated to N @ 5 GHZ. (So $150 already here).
    I picked up a Netgear 600 on a whim 2 days ago ($85 and could return). Of course BB told me I'd get a stronger signal and better streaming from this to all devices (most important to me is Apple TV and IPad, but I only use it for free Netflix 99% of the time and I don't believe you get many Hi-Def options). Thinking about it, can the 600 actually operate a full speed N network while supplying G? Does it drop to lowest speed like some? Again, BB told me it would send N speed and G speed simultaneously... Odd for $85???
    Here's what I'm running...
    1) Hardwired PC as a backup and Media Server (Itunes & DVD Burner)
    2) Two T61 Lenovo Laptops (Win 7) - 802.11 G - General Use
    3) Ipad - Sometimes Netflix, Pandora, etc. - 802.11 N 5GHZ (Near full strength signal but short distances - normal with 5 GHZ)
    4) Apple TV - 802.11 N - Full Signal Strength  (80% streaming - 50' through cabinet and one wall; 20% hardwired)
    5) Ipod Touch 4 - Pandora, Web Surfing, Apps
    6) Iphone 4 - Pandora, Web, Apps
    Speed tests appear to be staying steady between the two different router setups; the Ipad, Iphone and Ipod with 11 - 12 Mbps and the laptops with 20 Mbps coming from a Comcast 20 Mbps line. I tried the upgrade to the 30 Mbps line and experienced no improvement.
    Specifically, with only a 20 Mbps line should I expect to lose speed and/or signal strength in a chained setup vs the one dual band router?
    If so, is it odd the dual band router isn't faster than chained with current settings. Maybe the 600 needs tweeked?
    I don't mind keeping the 600 if it could truly make a difference but after a day and a half, I don't believe I'm seeing a difference. There could be a number of other factors that I'm missing, so that is the real meat of the question. Aside from simplicity, are there other things I should consider before going back to the chained setup?
    Surprisingly, the cheap 824N maintains a strong, consistent signal and speed. However, I'm not seeing any improvement in speed from the dedicated Cisco Router for N @ 5 GHZ like I had expected. I thought N capable devices would really benefit from removing so much interference. I'm in a Condo and the devices consistently see the same 6 or so networks. Net Stumbler shows about 16 networks, almost all 2.4 GHZ G networks.
    My thinking was the Netgear 600 could possibly produce a strong, faster signal to both G and N devices. It seems odd to me that the laptops max out the 20 Mbps download but neither setup pushes the Apple devices past an average of 12 Mbps, especially the Ipad.
    Please share your thoughts on this. I'm getting OCD over this and I'm tired of deciphering and trying to tie together information "close" to my questions but none of them specific to what I'm looking for.
    Thank you!!!!!
    Brad

  • If we got Nexus 1000V from VMWARE , can we add the N1K to our CCO ( Cisco Account ) to have direct support from Cisco

    Hi
    If we got Nexus 1000V from VMWARE , can we add the N1K to our CCO ( Cisco Account ) to have direct support from Cisco
    as sometimes it take some more time to get answer from VMWARE -> Cisco
    Thanks

    No.  When you purchase support from Vmware, they are your support contact and they will escalate support to Cisco on your behalf if needed.  This is the case for all OEM support.  Cisco provides support for RHEL, Microsoft and VMware.  We follow the same practice. 
    Deciding who to purchase support from is a decision of single point of contact for all VMware & N1K related issues vs. maintaining separate support contracts with each vendor individually.
    Regards,
    Robert

Maybe you are looking for