Role Assignment date is not reflected properly

Hi All,
I have OIM 11.1.1.5.0 version installed on my machine. In it, whenever I create a new user and assign some role to him, the role assignment date is coming as the date on which the role was created in OIM setup and not the day on which the role was assigned to the user. I think there's something wrong here. Can someone please help me with the same? Not understanding what to check or how to proceed.
Thanks,
$id

Hi Nishith,
I checked the values of the usg_create in the usg table as suggested by you. And surprisingly it has the correct value in it. 20-DEC which was today. However in the self service profile page of the same user in the My Roles tab, the Role Assignment date is shown as 09 November. Can you please help me with whatever is wrong here?
Thanks a lot,
$id

Similar Messages

CUP 5.3 sp7.1 - 049:Role assignment to user not executed completely

Hello Experts,
Message received in audit information:
049:Role assignment to user not executed completely
Can anyone help me with why I am receiving this message?
=[],id=6129,reqNo=201000139,actionDate=Tue Oct 19 10:40:27 EDT 2010,action=ROLE_PROVISIONING_FAILED,userId=U03776,path=,stage=,actionValue=PR4-300,description=049:Role assignment to user U10025 not executed

Hi,
Check that the connector that you have created is working fine and also the user ID that you are using in the backend system is within the valditiy date and all the required authorizations.
Use remote login and ensure that the user can login with out any issues and has all the required authorizations.
Rgds,
Raghu

Purchasing requistion dates are not reflecting in R/3

Hi All,
material created in R/3,here purchase requistion generated in R/3 & APO.
Then in APO,after Rescheduling in detailed scheduling planning board new purchase requistion delievery date is not
reflecting in R/3.
Kindly revert back ASAP.
Regards,
Venkat.
Edited by: venkat1215 on Jul 23, 2010 11:05 AM
Edited by: venkat1215 on Jul 23, 2010 11:30 AM

Venkat,
You didn't answer my question.
As a general rule of thumb, APO is much fussier about changing and synchronizing orders that were created in R/3. If you have a choice, you should always create purchase reqs in APO (although cross-creation is supported, and can be made to work nicely if you are diligent).
When you change an order in APO, and then publish the change to R/3, it is possible that the settings in R/3 will cause an issue with 'booking' the change. One way to test this is to manually make the same change, but directly in R/3. There should be no warnings or errors.
Another thing to look at are the Application logs on both sides (SLG1) for possible failures that may give a clue. Restrict to date and time interval where you know the proper update did not take place.
Rgds,
DB49

Uploaded Data's Not reflecting

Dear Experts,
Org Unit change of 1500 Workers Uploaded through BDC but still Data is not reflecting in the particular new Org Unit. I have Run the RHINTE Reports too is anything Im Missing Please help.
Thanks & Regards
Khaiser

Dear Experts,
Issue Resolved by Own!!!
Regards
Khaiser

One business area data is not reflecting queries very urgent

we had two business areas under one chart of account .while executing the query the fig of one business area not reflecting in queries what could be the reason.
please i will assign full points give me best solution.Very urgent
Regards,
sampath

my friend kalpana,
data was ther.i will tell u clear picture
i am configuring fi general ledger accounting.
i ahave loaded line item data to 0figl_o02
and i have loaded leading ledger data to ofigl_o10 and ofigl_c10
when i am executing the query i cannot see the fig from one of our business area ACC.Only CRIS B AREA FIG COMING.
WHTA COULD BE THE REASON.pLEASE HELP ME OTHERWISE I WILL BE
in big trouble.i need to test the data.Please kalpana.....
Thanks & Regards,
Sampath

Data is not displaying properly in FTP Server

Hi Gurus,
I need to display the data in FTP SERVER as well as Apllication Server. The data is storing in Application server properly but it is not dispalying properly in FTP Server.
Please give me suggistions.
Thanks,
Usha.G

Hi Ushashri..
Because of format variation sometimes this kind of issues will happen.
so while writing into FTP server check the Character mode and Binary mode option,
Thanks
Gowrishankar

Master data updation not reflected in Bex report

Hi,
There is a field "Approver" in a report. It will only show the name of the Approver. And recently the same approver name has been changed in MDM system and now the problem is newly changed name is not reflecting the reporting. It shows the only old name in reporting.
My doubt is, what about already loaded record in BW system. Whether changes will be made for the older data. I mean it is possible to overwrite the approver name stored earlier in BW.
D Raj

Hi
Yes, master is always overwritten.
load the new value to the approver Info object.
in RSA1 -> right click --> activate master data.
Initially when data loaded, records will be Modified version. when you perform activate master data then M versions records will turn to A version.
records with A version are only visible in Report.
If your report is on Aggregates, then you have to perform ACR (attribute change run) to update the same new value in aggregate.
you can use the program RSDDS_AGGREGATES_MAINTAIN.
Regards,
Venkatesh

Table date filter not working properly

Hi OTN,
I have noticed that table date filter not always working properly.
When I copy actual value from column outputText to column filter and hit Enter - I see an empty table.
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/818/filter.png/
I suspect the problem to lie among date formats.
But I tried to delete convertDateTime from outputText or add it under filter inputDate. Nothing helped.
<af:column sortProperty="Hisdate" sortable="true"
                                 headerText="#{bindings.InformationView1.hints.Hisdate.label}"
                                 id="c8" visible="false" filterable="true"
                                 width="83">
                        <af:outputText value="#{row.Hisdate}" id="ot5">
                          <af:convertDateTime pattern="#{bindings.InformationView1.hints.Hisdate.format}"/> // or without both lines
                        </af:outputText>
                        <f:facet name="filter">
                          <af:inputDate id="id15"
                                        value="#{vs.filterCriteria.Hisdate}"
                                        columns="8">
                            <af:convertDateTime pattern="#{bindings.InformationView1.hints.Hisdate.format}"/> // or without both lines
                          </af:inputDate>
                        </f:facet>
                      </af:column>Nothing special about the attribute. A database table field of type DATE. In database this (see picture) row has exactly "06.06.2006".
Could you please point me out where to start seeking?
Thanks.
JDev 11.1.1.4

Well, OK. I think I'd better have 2 attributes: truncated date for filter and full date with time for edit.
What is an attribute type for datetime?
select trunc(t.HISDATE) AS HISDATE -- date attribute type
    ,to_char(t.HISDATE, 'dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi') AS HISDATETIME -- timestamp/date attribute type?Something like this?

Universe export - data changes not reflecting in Report

Hi
The changes and the latest updates in the database are not reflecting in reports,
even if i export the universe again.
and i have refreshed the reports, that even not reflecting.
i did Edit query and Run query this action also not bringing the latest data to reports
why this happens ?
how to solve this issue ?
Regards
Dineshkumar

You can search for KB articles on SAP Service Market Place .
Here is first :
Symptom
You make changes a local Universe in Designer.
When refreshing the report, in Desktop Intelligence, the results do not reflect Universe update.
It used to be enough to simply refresh report's data, for Dataprovider to show object changes from the Semantic layer.
Change of behaviour in SP3 codeline: the DeskI Query Panel does not automatically pick up the latest modifications made to the local Universe.
Reproducing the Issue
Using BusinessObjects Desktop Intelligence XIR2 SP3:
Using your universe (eFashion), create and refresh a simple Desktop Intelligence report (.rep).
Make a simple change to the universe (like renaming a field/ object name) and save these changes.
Go back to the open DeskI report and try to refresh the data provider using: 'Data/Refresh Data'.
This will not show the latest changes.
However, if you follow the same workflow using XIR2 SP2, the universe update will be immediately visible (in the report) simply after refresh.
Cause
This is not a product regression, but intentional change in application's code delivered with FixPack3.1.
Fix Request ADAPT00818520 changed the application's behaviour: << When a restricted user is logged on to view a Desktop Intelligence document, prompt windows may be slow to open. >>
Resolution
In Desktop Intelligence menu, go to: Tools > Universes
Click 'Refresh'
Select and 'Import' your universe
Next, go to toolbar menu: Data > Edit Data Provider
In Query Panel, click 'Run' to regenerate the Query and interrogate the updated universe.
Only after following these actions will the .unv ammendments be visible in the report.
Here is second :
Symptom
Changes to object made for the Universe is not affected when refreshed from InfoView if we check 'Allow selection of multiple Contexts' in Universe Designer
Desktop Intelligence (Deski) Report still prompts for selection of contexts even if 'Allow selection of contexts' is unchecked for Universe
Row level Restriction is not applied correctly in InfoView(View Mode) when 'Allow selection of multiple Contexts' checked in the Universe Designer
Environment
BusinessObjects Enterprise XI 3.1 Service Pack 2 Fix Pack 2.6
Reproducing the Issue
Changes to object made in the Universe is not affected in InfoView(View mode) when 'Allow selection of multiple Contexts' is checked in Universe
1. Log in to Designer
i) Import Island Resort Marketing
ii) Go to Universe Parameter >> SQL
ii)Uncheck Allow Selection of Multiple Context
2. Create a new Desktop Intelligence(Deski) Report based on Island Resort Marketing
i) Drag the object Country in the Result's Pane
ii) Save and Export the report to the repository.
3. In Designer Change the Object Country under Resort from Resort_Country.country to
i) Resort_Country.country+'ddd'
Note: Uncheck Allow Selection of Multiple Context
ii) Save and Export the Universe
4. Log in to InfoView
i) View the report
ii) Refresh the report
iii) Changes to the object taken place i.e Country is concatenated with ddd
5. In the Universe Designer, change the Object Country under Resort from Resort_Country.country to
i) Resort_Country.country+'eee'
Note: Check Allow Selection of Multiple Context
ii) Save and Export the Universe
6. Log out from InfoView and login again
i) View the report
ii) Refresh the report
iii) Changes not taken place. Shows only Country instead of Country concatenated with eee.
Row level Restriction is not applied correctly in InfoView(view Mode) when 'Allow selection of multiple Contexts' checked for the Universe.
Import efashion Universe
Drag the Outlet_Lookup table into the objects pane on the left hand side
Create Row Level Restriction on the state field of Outlet_Lookup table as Outlet_Lookup.State=(u2018Texasu2019)
Apply the restriction to Administrator
Save and Export the Universe. Note: Uncheck Allow Selection of Multiple Context in Universe Parameter>>SQL
Log in to Desktop Intelligence (Deski) as administrator with Enterprise Authentication
Create a new Deski report
Drag the object state from the Outlet_Lookup table to the Results pane
Observed that the administrator is able to see only Texas which is expected behavior
Save and export the report
Log in to Infoview as Administrator
View the report. Refresh the report
Observed that the administrator is able to see only Texas which is expected behavior
Log in to Infoview as any user say Test User
View the report. Refresh the report
Observed that Test User is able to see all the states which is expected behavior
In the Universe Designer, Check Allow Selection of Multiple Context in Universe Parameter>>SQL for efashion Universe
Save and export the Universe
Log in to Infoview as Test user
View the report
Refresh the Report
TestUser is able to see only Texas which mean that the restriction is applied to Test User also
Cause
This is by Design as the 'Allow selection of multiple Contexts' forces selection of the context, which is not possible in Infoview, so that in Infoview it is assumed the Context is already selected and no SQL regeneration is required.
Resolution
Problem Description: Changes to object made in the Universe is not affected when refreshed from InfoView if we check 'Allow selection of multiple Contexts' in Universe Designer
Explanation:
If we modify an object and selects also the option 'Allow selection of multiple Contexts', it means that potentially there is more than one SQL that can be generated with the use of that object. Hence if a report is created in Deski, run and exported to enterprise, that means, one particular context (SQL) has been selected.
If you then update one or more of the objects again, the SQL will have to be regenerated in Deski for the right context to be selected for that particular report.
Therefore, if this option is used, for the objects to be updated, the SQL of the report will have to be regenerated in Deski, run and export it back to repository, then refresh the report in InfoView.
For Deski reports viewed in InfoView, it is not possible to evaluate the context on refresh. The report will always use the context stored with the report and same for the SQL. Therefore the Deski report will need to be imported locally, refresh it and then export it back to repository for the changes to take place.
Problem description: Desktop Intelligence (Deski) still prompts for selection of contexts even if 'Allow selection of contexts' is unchecked for Universe
Explanation:
The option 'Allow selection of Multiple Contexts' in Designer is not to disable the prompt. It will prompt you to select context if the object used is associated with context. The option is just to allow Deski to select multiple contexts at a time if in case the object used is associated with multiple contexts and accordingly generates the SQL.
However if we uncheck the option even if there are multiple contexts associated with the object used, it will allow selection of only one context at a time.
Problem Description: Issue with Row level Restriction when refreshed from InfoView with 'Allow selection of multiple Contexts' checked for the Universe.
Explanation:
We first have to regenerate the SQL in Deski, then export it to repository and refresh from InfoView for the changes to take place correctly. The explanation above applies.

Delivery date is not coming properly in PO Printout

Hi,
I have a problem in PO Printout that Delivery date is not coming properlyu2026In my PO, there are 5 line items.
If the Delivery date of all line items are same like 01.04.2009, then Delivery date should be shown 01.04.2009 in PO printout.. IT IS COMING RIGHT.
But if the Delivery Date of all line items are different like 01.04.2009, 02.04.2009, 03.04.2009, 04.04.2009 and 05.04.2009. Then Delivery Date should be shown with the each line items in PO print out. THIS IS NOT SHOWING IN MY PO PRINT OUT.
Please tell me what is the problem. Why not coming Delivery date with each line items???
Regardsu2026

currently i dont have SAP installed with this system, so i just suggesting you some thing.
goto tcode: nace.
select your output type. check the processing routines. check the smartform and processing routines attached to it. and see how the field is getting populated and what fields are being passed there.

Dates are not flowing properly into bw

Hi Friends,
We have some serious problem. we have few reports on Sales and the data is extracted from r/3 into bw on daily basis. some times the reports working fine other times either the production date or exp date is not flowing into BW or it is giving a vague results that it is displaying sold products as available etc. can any one please help to fix this problem by which no other existing reports get affected and my problem should be solved. please help asap.

Hi bhagwati
Please explain the scenario when you are not getting dates....right now we can just guess
if you getting a X instead of date...this is because of aggregation of 2 or more dates...check your query if you are missing some char in row...
If you are getting blank then check the restriction of query and put same in infocube display and analyze where is the problem...if it is not coming in query then with same restriction cube also will not display
Thanks
Tripple k

Oracle date field not comparing properly with to_date function

Hi, i'm facing a very weird problem. I'm triyng to retrieve a range of records in between two dates. However, it doesn't seem to understand. What am i doing wrong?
let's say my table (MYRECORD) has this (where id is varchar and date is DATE and not timestamp) :
ID DATE
1 22-JAN-08
2 22-JAN-08
3 21-JAN-10
4 11-FEB-10
5 11-FEB-10
So, let's say iwanna get the records from 21st Jan 2010 :
select
date as ori_date from MYRECORD where
date = to_date('21/01/2010','DD/MM/YYYY')
1.)
it is not returning any record at all. I'm having problems with between dates and the to_date function as well,
so i'm trying to get the 'equal' part working first. I can't use to_char because at the end of the day,
i need to compare between dates.
what am i doing wrong? has this got anything to do with what kind of format is set up on the oracle server?
running :
SELECT value FROM v$nls_parameters WHERE parameter ='NLS_DATE_FORMAT'
returns DD-MON-RR
2.) how do we compare dates from the table according to our own specified format from our passed string? I only have READONLY access to this database
so i can't set anything up.

please run this
select To_date(date, 'DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS') as ori_date from MYRECORDprobably you have hour minute second info in your table, to_date('01012010','DDMMYYYY') means hour, minute and second is 00:00:00 so it wont be equal.The database field type is actually 'DATE' and not datetime. I've also ran the sql you provided to show its timestamp, but it's not showing anything as far as timestamp is concerned. It's showing only the date. So does this mean it's a real date only information?
However, it might be more efficient to do two comparisons, especially if there's an index on dt:
WHERE   dt >= TO_DATE ('21/01/2010', 'DD/MM/YYYY')
AND     dt < TO_DATE ('22/01/2010', 'DD/MM/YYYY')
Ok. If we change the range to compare it on the same day, it won't work;
WHERE   dt >= TO_DATE ('21/01/2010', 'DD/MM/YYYY')
AND     dt <= TO_DATE ('21/01/2010', 'DD/MM/YYYY')this also happens if we're using BETWEEN
this is real weird. It's supposed to work...i don't recall having this kind of issue on other databases. If that's the case,
each time a user passes me a date string i have to somehow add another day onto its 'to' comparison date in order for things to work.
but..i don't want to since i don't want to accidentally include the extra day's results!
Edited by: 803998 on Oct 21, 2010 8:14 PM
Edited by: 803998 on Oct 21, 2010 8:33 PM

Extracting data to datasource 0HR_PT_1, data does not reflect in structure.

I have already enhanced datasource 0HR_PT_1 to include the 4 fields I need from table T549Q (PABRJ PABRP BEGDA ENDDA) and I am trying to write the extract to move the data, but I seem to be having issues. The correct data is stored in an internal table with a header line, and it is also being looped through.I am doing a 'READ TABLE <itab> BINARY SEARCH and then a MOVE statement to move the fields from the internal table to the data source fields, along with a MODIFY table statement. The data is not populating, even though it is in the internal table, any suggestions?

DESCRIBE TABLE t_ptdw_pws LINES wa_line.
IF NOT wa_line IS INITIAL.
    SELECT pabrj pabrp begda endda
    FROM t549q
    INTO TABLE gt_t549q
    FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_ptdw_pws
    WHERE permo = '98'
    AND   begda <= t_ptdw_pws-kday
    AND   endda >= t_ptdw_pws-kday.
    SORT gt_t549q by pabrj pabrp.
    LOOP AT t_ptdw_pws.
      CLEAR: gt_t549q, l_idx.
      l_idx = sy-tabix.
        READ TABLE gt_t549q with key t_ptdw_pws-zzpabrj
        BINARY SEARCH.
        t_ptdw_pws-zzpabrj = gt_t549q-pabrj.
        t_ptdw_pws-zzpabrp = gt_t549q-pabrp.
        t_ptdw_pws-zzpaybegda = gt_t549q-begda.
        t_ptdw_pws-zzpayendda = gt_t549q-endda.

GL assign to fsv not reflecting Financial Statments

Hi
GL Code is assigned to Financial Statement Version .
in report S_ALR_87012284 ( Financial Statment Version - Pbcl ) with same FSB, for above GL code transactions are showing in "Not Assigned" .
is there problem in FI Document or else
please advise.
thanks

hi
MG- Financial Accounting- General Ledger Accounting - Business
Transactions - Closing Documenting Define Financial Statement
Versions
path is
MG- Financial Accounting- General Ledger Accounting - Master data > G/L Accounts > Define Financial Statement
Versions
but here it is defined.
Regards
Thomas

Business object data is not reflecting in data control

Hi
I am new to BPM i have a scenario to expose the Business objects(created in my own not from XSD) into data control while updating the any attribute in the business object,but it's not happening while i am trying this scenario.
can some please help me ASAP

I think what you're referring to is that you've generated an ADF user interface based on one of your human tasks and that human task took as input one of your processes variables that was based on a BPM Object you created from scratch and you've updated the BPM Object and are not seeing the update reflected in your Data Control.
In the simplest case, this might work:
1) Open the Application Navigator tab
2) Click the refresh icon to the right of the "Data Controls" title in the tab
3) Inside the Data Control tab, right mouse click the specific data control that is based on the human task and the XSD (the one you want to refresh) -> click "Edit Definition" -> click "Refresh Data Control".
If that doesn't work, open your ADF project's "DataControls.dcx" file. This file hard codes the location of the corresponding human task file (.task) and the schema file (.xsd).

Role Assignment date is not reflected properly

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for