Role membership rule not working

Hi guys,
When I create a role and assign 'membership rule' to it, the members are shown in preview screen.
But they are not  show up in members screen of that role.
My environment is 11gR2 SP1.
It is working nicely in 11gR2 base. But from some bundle pack and after, it is not working.
1. is it right?
2. if then, why is it changed?
3. and how shoul I assign members to role?
(as a workaround I modified the memner arrtibute. => not working
and restart OIM, => still not working
and reboot the server.> still not working...)
can anyone help this?
regards,
dongsu

J,
It has been a critical issue in real customer project this year.
Certainly we informed it to local oracle team and they says it is intentional change and we have to accept it.
(means create role first and read in users by trusted recon from source again.. bra bra..)
But I do not get any documented information about it.
Actually in BP4 (may be..) if I change any attribute value of that user who supposed to  belongs to that role, then it works.
But in BP7 and now in PS1, even that approach do not working.

Similar Messages

  • Infopath form load rule not working in browser forms but works on Client

    Hi
    I am working on an Infopath form and there are rules on form load. The form load checks for a value in a list, if the username() matches the one in the list, then the form would change its view.
    It works when I open it on client, but on the browser it fails.
    Have anyone encountered such an issue.

    Check below:
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16222681/infopath-rule-is-not-running-when-checking-sharepoint-list-field-value
    Ensure that "Include data for the active form only" was checked (I had to separate this field into another data connection because that box could not be checked for another field I was using), and
    Ensure that in the rule I was selecting from the "dataFields" folder under the data connection instead of "queryFields"
    http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/28554/infopath-form-load-rules-not-working
    if I edit the Infopath form on Infopath 2007, it seems that the rules for the load form will be visible if created.
    This look like a bug. Here are the steps below that will lead you to the bug:
    Step 1: Open the infopath form in Infopath 2010 and create 6 rules for Form Load and Save it as a file.
    Step 2: Open that infopath form that you created in Step 1 in InfoPath 2010 and go to the
    Form Load section. You will only see the first 5 rules. The 6th rules that you created for Step 1 will just "vanish". Now, close that infopath form.
    Step 3: Open that infopath form that you created in step 1 in InfoPath 2007 and select Tools > Form Option. In the
    Open and Save category, click the Rules button and add a new rule in it and save it.
    Step 4: Open that infopath form that you modify as describe in Step 3 in InfoPath 2010. That 6th rule will be visible.
    Therefore, there might be a bug in InfoPath 2010 that restrict Rules to a max of 5 in Form Load and thus if anyone open that form in SharePoint, only the first 5 rules will be executed.
    If this helped you resolve your issue, please mark it Answered

  • Defaulting Rules Not Working for Repair Orders in OM?

    Hi,
    Defaulting Rules have been setup for return line & standard line based on few conditions and it is working fine if we create a sales order directly from OM (Manual SO)?
    But in our project we are using  Depot Repair(Repair Orders), we tried to create a service request and then converted to a sales order here defaulting rules not working for repair orders?
    Please help me to solve this issue ASAP.
    Thanks,
    Kishor

    Hi,
    You have like this:
    1. Price list
    2.OE_DEFAULT_PVT.Get_SOB_Currency_Code
    You have to make
    1. XXOE_DEFAULT_PVT.custom_code
    2. Price list
    3.OE_DEFAULT_PVT.Get_SOB_Currency_Code
    Did you made own custom code to pick currency?
    Regards,
    Luko

  • My adobe presenter redemption code (creative cloud) membership does not work.

    my adobe presenter redemption code (creative cloud) membership does not work.  Each time I input my presenter code at creativecloud/redeem it returns a message 'ooops, this code has been redeemed.'

    I got both installed but on installing Presenter keeps giving errors that a previous version is installed on the computer and cannot proceed.  I verified that there is no previous version and keep redoing the install and get stuck AGAIN and AGAIN at this point.
    I also verified that I have the latest version of Flash on Chrome and I have the latest version.  Why is Adobe so all over on downloading/installing their products.  I (and other paying customers)  cannot waste more time on this very simple procedure just because the software packages are not packaged properly or. the teams in charge of ensuring the products DID NOT correctly package the products securely (with the updates included) and more importantly, ensured that the products were linked to user accounts who purchased them.

  • Policies assigned to groups - membership changes not working

    I have a single ZESM IR8 server setup.
    All security throughout my environment, ZESM and otherwise, is based on group membership.
    If I change a user from one group to another group this change does not reflect in their policy assignment.
    Scenario: GroupA = standard user policy, GroupB = power user policy.
    UserA was first in Group A and therefore got the standard user policy.
    UserA now requires the power user policy.
    Remove UserA from GroupA and add UserA to GroupB (in iManager).
    UserA does NOT get the "power user" policy that is assigned to GroupB
    Am aware that I can assign the policy at a user level but this is NOT an option in my environment. All security assignments MUST happen at a group level.

    What you observed is the expected behavior.
    ZESM doesn't updates group membership in real time once a policy has been published. I've described this behavior on previous posts.
    What the MC does behind the scenes when you click "Publish" on a container or group object is to assign the policy individually to each member/user. For groups, it resolves membership at the time the policy is published then the MC iterates among each member assigning the policy to each of them. That's why you don't see updates once the policy is published.
    Try Updating the published policy to see if that works. From the docs:
    Updating a Published Policy
    Once a policy has been published to the user(s) or computer(s), simple updates can be maintained by editing the components in a policy, and re-publishing. For example, if the ZENworks Endpoint Security Management Administrator needs to change the WEP key for an access point, the adminstrator only needs to edit the key, save the policy, and click Publish. The affected end-users and computers receive the updated policy (and the new key) at their next check-in.
    >>>
    From: laurabuckley<[email protected]>
    To:novell.support.zenworks.endpoint-security-management
    Date: 12/15/2009 7:16 AM
    Subject: Policies assigned to groups - membership changes not working
    I have a single ZESM IR8 server setup.
    All security throughout my environment, ZESM and otherwise, is based on
    group membership.
    If I change a user from one group to another group this change does not
    reflect in their policy assignment.
    Scenario: GroupA = standard user policy, GroupB = power user policy.
    UserA was first in Group A and therefore got the standard user policy.
    UserA now requires the power user policy.
    Remove UserA from GroupA and add UserA to GroupB (in iManager).
    UserA does NOT get the "power user" policy that is assigned to GroupB
    Am aware that I can assign the policy at a user level but this is NOT
    an option in my environment. All security assignments MUST happen at a
    group level.
    laurabuckley
    laurabuckley's Profile: http://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=122
    View this thread: http://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=395870

  • Issue in evaluation of Role Membership Rule in gtc trusted recon.

    Hi All,
    I got a issue in evaluation of role membership in gtc trusted recon.
    i created a custom UDF in user profile.i am updating that field from gtc trusted recon.
    i created a rule based on that custom UDF.But that is not triggering while we run the gtc trusted recon.users are coming to oim from database .but rule is not evaluating.
    if we manually create any user rule is evaluating.role is assingning .
    how to solve this problem.it is very urgent for me.
    thanks in advance.
    -Hanuman

    hi bikash,
    i am using oim 11.1.1.5 version.
    Access policy is triggering if role is assigned to the user ,when i directly create the user in oim, instead of gtc trusted recon.
    that udf field is mobile status.it is custom udf .
    Thanks & Regards,
    Hanuman. T

  • Alert Rule - not working. Wild Card character issue

    Hi All,
           I have a requirement where I need to trigger alerts for mapping failures
    of all the interfaces whose namespace is urn:abc.com:odna* or urn:abc.com.odna*.     (in the first instance, there is dot before odna and int he second instance, a colon before odna )
    So to suit both the cases, I gave urn:abc.comodna in the Alert Rule.
    It worked before. But now its not working.
    Then when i changed it to urn:abc.com:odna* it works again. i really dont understand how it worked before and why it fails now.
    What is the reason for the unpredicatable behaviour of WildCard Character based Alert Rules?
    Should Wild Card Characters be avoided completely?

    Hey
    Just create two separate alert rules for the same alert category
    one for urn:abc.com:odna* and another for urn:abc.com.odna*.
    but before that please make sure that "Suppress multiple alerts of this rule" box is unchecked.
    Also please check SAP Note 913858
    Thanx
    Aamir
    Edited by: Aamir Suhail on May 20, 2009 9:16 AM

  • Rule not working in workflow but works in simulation mode

    Hi guys
    i have one more strange issue. I have a rule assigned to one of my task to dtermine the agnet based on a z table which is executed by a z function module in the rule. The rule works fine and gets the desired agent when run in the simulation mode. But when we test it from the workflow it dosent seems to be working. When i check the workflow log it says no agent for this task. any idea what am i missing?
    thanks in advance.

    Hi
    yes both the workflow and the dialog step( in our case a decision step)  is categorized as General task. I also have used the SWU_OBUF to refresh the buffer but still the same results. Rule works fine in simulation but when it is run in a workflow the workflow log says no agent found. any more suggestions? the workflow to rule binding is fine as well. The rule requires 3 parameters and in the binding i am pasing all the 3 elemts to the rule containers. so i am not sure why its not working?

  • Substitution rule not working

    Hi
    The substitution rule for getting the desired Business place and Section code is not working in Transaction code MRIS, whereas this substitution rule is working in all other Transaction codes.
    Please suggest.
    Regards
    Prakash

    Bhanu,
    Subsitution rule works when you are posting in Financial Accounting tables: BSEG and BKPF. FB60 and MIRO do that.
    The report doesn't make post in mentioned tables to get substitution done. Please make sure if there is a existing call transaction or only a planning are being assigned.
    regards    

  • Delete rule not working

    I subscribe to a mailing list using a particular email address (not my primary account), all mail for which is redirected into a mailbox. I only want to keep messages from the last five days. I have a Rule which is set as follows:
    If ALL of the following conditions are met:
    Account = <the account>
    Date Received is Greater Than 5 days old
    Perform the following actions:
    Delete Message
    This rule does does not work. It is the first rule in my list of Rules. And it simply does nothing. Why?

    Maxplanar,
    Mail rules only run when the item is first processed. So you are in effect going to delete things only when they are received in an "old" state.
    I would set up a smart mailbox or two. One to only show the 5 days of mail you want to pay attention to. Optionally make another smart mailbox to contain messages older than 5 days. You can just refer to the first mailbox and only see the messages you want. The other mailbox will be there for once a month when you select all the messages and delete them.
    Most macs can handle 5 to 10 thousand messages without even starting to slow down. Perhaps once you have a managable folder that shows you the messages you care to see, you can live with manually cleaning up much less often?

  • Derivation Rules Not Working for other company codes

    Hi,
    I have 5 Company codes and only for one FM was activated. now i want to activate FM for all 5 company codes. for which i have assigned the FM area to all 5 company codes. I have also assigned the derivation strategy to all 5 company codes as well. now when i post a transaction for any other company code derivation rules is not being process hence no commitment item or fund center is derived. however for the original company code for which FM was activated in the first derivation rule are working fine means system is deriving commitment item and fund center. can any one tell me why derivation rules are not working for other company codes? do i have to add Company code in source field of derivation strategy? could this be the reason? because in beginning there was no other company code so we did not included any company code field in the first place.
    Regards,

    Faizan,
    Go to  Funds Management Government> Actual and Commitment Update/Integration> Activate/Deactivate Funds Management.
    In the screen create an entry for each Company Code and Funds Management Area combination.
    Activate the AA Derivtn flag if you want the derivation to be called and the Update flag if you want to update commitments and actuals in FM.
    Thanks
    Shyam

  • Copa derivation rule not working for Discount GL

    Hi All,
    Kindly note that I have a distribution rule where company & plant combination is used where condtion is that customer group 3 should be 018 and then replace distribution channel to 03.However the rule is not working for discount GL posted in the billing document.
    I tried testing it in FB50 but then it does not allows me to enter plant and because of that derivation rule fails. However in my billing doc I do see a plant  against discount GL and still the rule is not getting picked.
    I had raised this issue earlier but the reply where not as expected and so I have rephraised my question.
    Kindly help me on this.
    Regards
    Pranay

    Hi Pranay
    I could not understand your req to a great detail, following are my observations
    1. There should be derivation rule in place 1st of all to derive customer group from billing doc...
    Check if Cust Group is populated in your COPA doc or not.. For this cust group should be a segment level char in KEQ3
    2. Create a derivation rule using method "Derivation".
    Source fields would be Cust Group, Plant and Company code ( I guess you want to change dist channel with this combination)
    Target field would be VTWEG (Dist Channel)....Click on the magnifying lens beside VTWEG and choose relevant radio button "Overwrite if ......."
    CLick on RULE VALUES and maintain the required Values there
    This should work...
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Nesting of Rules for Auto Group (Role) Membership Rules in OIM 11gR2

    Does anyone know how to nest rules for auto group (role) membership in OIM 11gR2. The General rules in Design Console are no longer used for auto group membership and the rules that can be configured in the Role properties cannot be nested as far as I can see.
    Any info is appreciated.
    Thanks!

    My mistake... this is possible in the web ui.

  • Some smart album rules not working

    At a bit of a loss here - either my upgrade to Mavericks or my upgrade of Aperture to 3.5 has caused my Smart Albums to not work with various EXIF checking rules.
    I frequently have rules which check the EXIF tag, Camera Make, and check if it is Canon - this allows me to filter out and focus on my Canon 5D3 photos and not get distracted in relatively pointless editing of iPhone snaps. Unfortunately it doesn't work. Camera Make is Canon returns no matches, Camera Make starts with Canon returns nothing, Camera Make ends with Canon returns nothing.
    If I go and look at a photo, I can see the Camera Make exif flag says "Canon" in the field. No spaces at the end or anything silly. It used to work.
    Anyone experienced similar? Anyone have solutions?

    Hmm, interesting. Given your use of quotes I just tried "Canon" including the double quotes, but that made no difference either.
    The EXIF filter is the only rule on the smart album, and while the smart album is set for a single project, there are several hundred photos that should match in it. If I set the smart album to "Library" rather than the project, it still matches none...! Just in case there's some other rule burried away that just isn't displayed, I switched the smart album to "Match Any" rather than "All", and that too returns no photos.

  • MRIS Substitution rule not working

    Hi
    the Substitution rule to populate the Business Place and Section code is working with all other transaction codes like FB60, MIRO etc., but not working with MRIS (Mass MIRO) by which we are facing problem in J1INCHLN. Please suggest regarding.
    SAP Marketplace has rejected siting it as consulting issue.
    Regards
    Prakash.

    Bhanu,
    Subsitution rule works when you are posting in Financial Accounting tables: BSEG and BKPF. FB60 and MIRO do that.
    The report doesn't make post in mentioned tables to get substitution done. Please make sure if there is a existing call transaction or only a planning are being assigned.
    regards    

Maybe you are looking for