"Role not defined for individual users" on user import

Hello,
I am trying to import a certain user from one portal to another and I get this warning message:
"Role <pcd_role_path> not defined for individual users."
This role is assigned to this user at the 1st portal and exists at the 2nd portal at the same location.
What does it mean and what do I need to do in this case?

hi Roy,
just check one thing ....
please check wether the user have permissions to those roles.
please go to the PCD location, where the roles have defined.
right click on the role and check permissions.
see if the user you are using is mentioned there. if no, add your user with read/write end user permission.
i hope this will help you .
Regards,
Sujay

Similar Messages

I have Microsoft Office within my user name, but it is not available for the other 2 users. What do I need to do to allow them access?

I have Microsoft Office within my user name, but it is not available for the other 2 users. What do I need to do to allow them access to the software?

http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/mac/forum/macoffice2011-macstart/how-do-i-ena ble-office-for-all-users-on-one-mac/38bd94cc-d26c-41c9-8471-ee87d63ebfc9?msgId=0 fbd6314-a12a-4fed-85f9-d939208095ff

SFLIGHT is NOT defined for the current logical database.

I have just started learning ABAP and bought an ABAP Objects book by Horst Keller. I have installed 4.6d mini sap and SAP GUI 6.4 on win XP Prof. I executed S_FLIGHT_MODEL_DATA_GENERATOR to load DB tables.
(1). When I tried to check a sample program, I get an error message SFLIGHT is not defined for the current logical database.
Here is the partial code:
REPORT zbcb01f1 .
TABLES: sflight, sbook.
DATA: BEGIN OF sr OCCURS 100,
      carrid LIKE sbook-carrid,
      connid LIKE sbook-connid,
      fldate LIKE sbook-fldate,
      bookid LIKE sbook-bookid,
      order_date LIKE sbook-order_date,
      loccuram LIKE sbook-loccuram,
      END OF sr.
GET sflight.   <---- Error is pointed here
(2). I am also not getting Graphical Screen Painter when selecting Layout for a screen. Instead, I am getting alphanumeric editor.
Someone please help me.
Raizak.

Hi Raizak,
the easiest way is to go to service.sap.com/notes and enter the note number. For this time I've copied the 2 notes below.
Best regards,
Christian
Symptom
The Graphical Layout Editor of the Screen Painter either does not start or terminates.Error message 37527 is displayed in the session in which the call was made (Graphical Layout Editor not available.
Additional key words
() EUNOTE, EUSCREENPAINTER, 37 527
Cause and prerequisites
This note comprises all the common causes for error message 37527 and provides you with information on how to systematically trouble shoot the problem.
1. Windows32 or UNIX/motif?
As of Release 4.6B there is only the program version for 32bit Windows (NT, 95, 98, 2000 ff.).Up to Release 4.6A there was also a version for UNIX/Motif.All of the more current notes (with the exception of Note 45490) refer only to the Windows version.
2. Termination at the start or during use?
The following diagnostic steps refer to the causes of the errors which prevent the Graphical Layout Editor from starting. However, there are also known error causes, which result in the program terminating when the application is being used and which also produce the 37527 error message. This affects -
Rel.4.6C/D: Termination when attempting to read texts in the logon language -> Note 375494
Crash after transferring program and dictionary fields. Termination after transferring program and dictionary fields -> Note 189245
Release 3.1I: Termination after inputting field text -> Note 113318
3. Is the SAPGUI installation correct?
The Graphical Layout Editor is automatically installed during the standard installation of the SAPGUI.If you chose a non-standard installation, then you should have explicitely selected its installation (component "Development Tools - Graphical Screen Painter").
The program executable is called gneux.exe.During the SAPGUI installation it is placed in the same directory as the SAPGUI programms (for example, front.exe) (usually C:\Program Files\SAPpc\sapgui). The following belong to the program:
- An additonal executable gnetx.exe (RFC starter program)
- the DLL eumfcdll.dll
- various eusp* data files (that is, the names all begin with eusp.)
You can check the completeness of the program installation by starting the program gneux.exe locally in the SAPGUI directory (for example, by double-clicking on the program name in the Explorer window).The Layout Editor is displayed with German texts and an empty drawing area for the pseudo screen EUSPDYND 0000.
If the installation is not complete, an error dialog box provides information regarding the cause of the error, for example, sometimes the DLL eumfcdll.dll is missing after reinstalling the SAPGUI. For example, the eumfcdll.dll DLL was sometimes missing after the SAPGUI was reinstalled.
4. System link defined and okay?
The Graphical Layout Editor is a separate program which is started by the Screen Painter Transaction (SE51) on the Frontend machine.
Up to Release 3.0F, the programs communicated with each other via the graphics log of the SAPGUIs (gmux).The definition of the environment variable SAPGRAPH may be the cause for the program not being being found where it is.
As of Release 3.1 G, the programs use a separate RFC link which is set up in addition to the SAPGUI's RFC link.Missing or incorrect definitions of the RFC destination EU_SCRP_WN32 or problems with the creation of the RFC link are the most frequent causes for error message 37527 being displayed.Below you can find the correct settings for the RFC destination EU_SCRP_WN32 (under "Solution").Note 101971 lists all the possible causes for problems with the RFC link set-up. Attention:The Graphical Layout Editor may not be operated through a firewall (for example between the SAP and the customer system) because this does not allow an additional RFC connection in addition to the SAPGUI.
Solution
ad 1 UNIX/Motif
Note 45490 describes possible errors resulting from an incorrect program installation under UNIX/Motif (up to Release 4.6A).
ad 2 Termination when using
The above-mentioned notes may contain options for solving individual problems.However, you usually have to replace the program with an corrected version.You can do this either by downloading a patch from sapservX or by installing a more current SAPGUI.The patch is mentioned in the respective note.
ad 3 Installation
You either need to reinstall the SAPGUI or manually copy the missing file into the SAPGUI directory.In both cases you should make sure beforehand that a Graphical Layout Editor is no longer running.To do this you can either remove all processes gneux.exe from the process list by using a tool such as Task Manager (on WindowsNT) or exit the Graphical Layout Editor from the Screen Painter Transaction menu via Edit -> Cancel Graphical Screen Painter). Attention:For each session or system an individial Layout Editor process may exist so that, if need be, several processes should be cancelled.
ad 4 System link
Up to Release 3.0F:you can either delete the environment variable SAPGRAPH or copy all the files of the Graphical Layout Editor into the directory which is specified by SAPGRAPH.
As of Release 3.1G:you can use Transaction SM59 to check the RFC destination EU_SCRP_WN32 (expand the TCP/IP connections, select destination EU_SCRP_WN32).If the destination is missing, then you should create it with the following settings:
- Connection type "T" (start of an external program via ...)
- Activation type "Start"
- Start on "Front-end workstation"
- Front-end workstation program "gnetx.exe" (caution! NOT gneux.exe)
- Description (optional) "Graph. Screen Painter (Windows32)
Start Program gneux.exe using the gnetx.exe starter program."
If you want to start the program from a different directory than the SAPGUI standard directory, then replace the default value under Frontend work station by the complete path name for program gnetx.exe.Transaction SM59 also allows you to check the RFC connection via the pushbutton "Test connection").In this case the system attempts to localize and start the program gnetx.exe.If there are errors, a message is displayed regarding the possible causes (for example, gateway problem, timeout problem or the like).Note 101971 provides a detailed explanation of the problems involved with an RFC connection set-up.As the Graphical Screen Painter requires a functional RFC connection as of Release 3.1G, contact the System Administrator or create an message on the topic Middleware (BC-MID-RFC) if you encounter RFC problems.
If the program gnetx.exe can be found and started, the banner dialog box with logo, release data and version number is displayed briefly.As the Layout Editor itself is not started, the error cause must be in the installation of the Layout Editor program gneux.exe if the connection test was successful.
Release 4.5A to 4.6B: Use with Releases <3.1G>.
The Graphical Layout Editor is downward-compatible as regards the system connection, that is, an RFC-based Layout Editor for example from Release 4.6C can also be used on a non-RFC-based Screen Painter, for example of Release 3.0F.However, the releases mentioned above have a program error which causes a crash due to memory violation in the start phase of the program.Note 197328 describes the solution by installation of the corrected program version.
Important: Trace file dev_euspNNN!
If none of the diagnosis steps leads to the cause of the error and to the solution of the problem via the corresponding note, then you should add the contents of the trace files dev_euspNNN (NNN = process number) to the message for SAP, if possible.You can find this file in the current directory of the SAP System, for example under Windows NT in C:\Winnt\Profiles\<user>\SAPworkdir.If several such trace files can be found there, make sure that you use the file which matches the termination time with respect to date and time of creation.In most cases the ERROR message in the last lines of this trace file provides an important note on the cause of the error.
Source code corrections
Symptom
The graphic layout editor of the Screen Painter cannot be started (RFC version).
Other terms
() EUNOTE, EUSCREENPAINTER
Reason and Prerequisites
This is generally caused by the fact that the RFC connection between the frontend graphics layout editor and the calling screen painter program at the backend cannot be set up.
Possibility 1: Route permission denied
In the trace file dev_eusp<Process Id> of the graphics layout editor you find the entry "ERROR in RFCMgr_accept: not accepted", and in the RFC trace file dev_rfc.trc you have an entry of the form "ERROR route permission denied (<Front-Id> to <BackId>,<Service>)".
If there is a firewall between frontend computer and application
server, you need to decide whether the port for the RFC of the graphical layout editor can be released here (see Solution 1 below).
In case no firewall exists between the frontend computer and the application server, in its route permission table, the SAProuter contains either no entry for the frontend computer, on which the graphics layout editor is started, or the entry says that the link is saved by a password.Since the connection is denied, the graphics editor processes exits again, and the screen painter switches to the alphanumeric layout editor.
Possibility 2: Service 'sapgw<ServiceId>' unknown
In the trace file dev_eusp<ProzessId> of the graphics layout editor you have the entry "ERROR in RFCMgr_accept: not accepted", and in the RFC trace file dev_rfc.trc you have an entry of the form "ERROR service 'sapgw<ServiceId>' unknown".
The service sapgw<ServiceId> (for example, sapgw00) is not known on one of the computers participating in the RFC communication because the corresponding entry is missing in its service file. The affected computer can be the frontend computer or the gateway computer.
Possibility 3: The system parameter gw/cpic_timeout value is too low
This system parameter determines how many seconds the gateway is waiting for the RFC connection to be set up.In case of a high network load, the default value of 20 seconds is too small with the result that the connection cannot be created on time.Here the graphics layout editor process also exits with the trace file entry "ERROR in RFCMgr_accept: not accepted".
Possibility 4: System parameter abap/no_sapgui_rfc set
The profile parameter abap/no_sapgui_rfc of the system is set (that is, it has a value not equal to space or 0).This prevents the program of the graphics layout editor from being started with RFC at the frontend.
Possibility 5: Unnecessary authorization check
The error message "No RFC authorization for user xxxxxx" is generated although the check of the RFC authorization was deactivated by profile parameter auth/rfc_authority_check (value = space or 0). The problem is caused by a program error, that ignores the value of the profile parameter let during the call of the RFC authorization check (see Note 93254). This error can occur as of Release 4.5.
Solution
ad 1) If a Firewall is installed between frontend computer and the application server, you need to decide whether the port for the RFC link of the graphical layout editor shall be released in the firewall. This is port 33nn, where nn is the 2-digit system number of the SAP application server. As of Release 3.1G, the graphical layout editor needs an RFC link for communication with the application server in addition to the already existing linkof the SAP GUIs. Such a second link is not allowed by the firewall in general because it would contradict the security concept (password protection, logging of the connection).
If no firewall exists, you should check whether the frontend computer can be added to the route permission table or whether the password option can be removed from out of the available entry.
For details refer to chapter 4.4 of the attached Note 30289.
ad 2) Include service sapgw<ServiceId> in the service file.
Refer to Note 52959 for details.
ad 3) Increase value for system parameter gw/cpic_timeout. 60 seconds should be sufficent as a timeout limit.
ad 4) Set the system parameter abap/no_sapgui_rfc to space or 0
Start the application server so that the new parameter value comes into effect.
ad 5) Import the Support Package specified in the attachment for the release in question or implement the advance correction in the source code as described in the attached correction instructions.
As a workaround, assign RFC authorizations as described in Note 93254.

Payment order are not defined for extended withholding tax

Hi Gurus,
Would you please help me with the message below. It appears on F110 when I try to pay a vendor open item with extended withholding tax:
Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax
In my company payment orders are created in F110 for accounts payable, as we use another ERP system (Baan) to perform the local accounts payments, and now I've just activated Extended withholding tax functionality With accumulation (necessary in Brazil) but I get this error.
Is it not possible to user payment order with extended withholding tax + accumulation? I find it hard to believe...
I've tried to unflag the payment order only for the payment method I'm using in FBZP t.code, but then no payment order were created but instead a payment document were posted with the withholding tax accumulation, but this is not the way we are working, and nothing is sent to Baan
any help is welcome

The payment method "Y" the option "payment order only" was marked?
For a withholding tax type with accumulation in a company code with extended withholding tax payment
methods that create only payment orders can´t be used. Payment orders can only be created only if there are
no tax types with accumulation involved in the paid items of the payment run.
The functionality extended withholding tax works fine for Brazil
however, you can´t use the payment order with this functionality.
Please, review your customizing for payment method 'Y" in transaction
FBZP.
Best regards,
Leonardo Vedovelli
FI Support Engineer
SAP Active Global Support

Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax

Hi Gurus,
Would you please help me with the message below:
Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax
In my company payment orders are created in F110 for accounts payable, as we use another ERP system (Baan) to perform the local accounts payments, and now I've just activated Extended withholding tax functionality With accumulation (necessary in Brazil) but I get this error.
Is it not possible to user payment order with extended withholding tax + accumulation? I find it hard to believe...
I've tried to unflag the payment order only for the payment method I'm using in FBZP t.code, but then no payment order were created but instead a payment document were posted with the withholding tax accumulation, but this is not the way we are working, and nothing is sent to Baan
any help is welcome !
TREAD LOCKED SINCE IT IS DUPLICATED FROM THREAD payment order are not defined for extended withholding tax

Hi,
On the analysis, the system expects an entry in the T059Q table with
code as XX.
The reason being in the extended withholding tax we use multiple
witholding tax codes and these entries are stored in the table
with_item. And in BSEG we populate the field withholding tax code i.e.
BSEG-QSSKZ with the value 'XX'. In classical withholding tax we used to
store the code directly which is not possible with Extended withholding
tax.
As the field BSEG-QSSKZ refers to the values in the table T059Q-QSSKZ
the entry 'XX" needed in this table for the corresponding country of the
company code to maintain the correct relationship and consistent
database information.
Hence for the statistical purpose and for the internal calculations we
need an entry in the table T059Q. Could you please maintain this code
i.e. 'XX' also in the table T059Q in a test system? Then retest your issue.
This should resolve your issue.
Kind Regards,
Vanessa.

Window RUEKOPF is not defined for form ZWESCHEINV3

Hi Guru,
I have encountered an issue whose possible resolution i am not able to meet.
The issue is like this :
While performing MIGO for the Return Delivery user is successfully getting the maerial document number . But when user trying to perfor /n or anyother transaction following message is appearing (Note: For Good Receipt user is not getting any message)
SAPoffice info.
Express document "Update was terminated" received from author "User_Name".
The detailed analysis of this error message done using SM13. which is showing there is some error occured in Function module RV_MESSAGE_UPDATE
30     RV_MESSAGE_UPDATE     V1     Error (no retry)
The Update Header (ctrlshftF8) Information of this error showing details like below :
Update key      37AD64DF8023F1F1AAB2001F29E3A344
Client          505
User            408020
Date            21.05.2010 Time       09:48:39
Language        EN
Account
Report          SAPLMIGO
Transaction     MIGO
Enqueue key     20100521094825425000001277sap705..........................
Context         :E:
Information     (53) = SYNC_VB, DONT_PROCESS_AGAIN, VB_WITH_ENQUEUE, VB_ENQUEUES_RELEASED,
UD Ret. Code    9
Status          Update was terminated
Update server   sap705_P03_77
UD Client       sap705_P03_77
Local time zone CET
Time Offset     1
Error details   Class:     TD         Number:    426
Window RUEKOPF is not defined for form ZWESCHEINV3
Report     LSTXCU03             Row        101
Here i am getting error information for that particular function module that Window RUEKOPF is not defined for form ZWESCHEINV3.
Error details   Class:     TD         Number:    426
Window RUEKOPF is not defined for form ZWESCHEINV3
Report     LSTXCU03             Row        101
The single test (ctrlshftF9) in Sm13 of that particular function module shows the following error message
Window RUEKOPF is not defined for form ZWESCHEINV3
After going through the help text of the above error message I have found following
Diagnosis
The specified window is not defined in the form
I have checked the form ZWESCHEINV3 in SE71. The window RUEKOPF is present over there.
So what might be the reason for getting this error and what approach we should take to resolve this.
Thanks & regards
Saifur Rahaman

Hi,
I have gone through the OSS note you have provided.. There i can able to find that This is for error message whose TD = 427
Symptom
When you print a collective slip for areturn delivery, the update
terminates in function module RV_MESSAGE_UPDATE. *The error message is TD*
*427.*
But if you check my case
Error details   Class:     TD         Number:    426
So I would like to know how far this ossnote will helpout to resolve issue like my case
Thanks & regards
Saifur Rahaman

Error - Account type D is not defined for document type WL

I am getting error while doing PGI (Post Goods Issue).
Error - Account type D is not defined for document type WL

As we had the same problem for a document in our system, I was also browsing for the answer. I saw this thread and now we have found the solution, so could not resist sharing, although it is an old posting.
In these cases it can be that a user wants to create a purchase order of the type UB. But if you have stock transport between two companies, you should not use this order type. You have to use order type NB.
If the user creates the PO with NB then probably they will not get the message.

FBVB error msg "Transaction not defined for direct call-up"

Dear Gurus,
Pls help me on issues below:-
1.)What is the diff between FBV0 and FBVB?
2.)When i try to initialize FBVB. I received an error "Transaction FBVB not defined for direct call-up. Can u teach me how to fix it up coz one of my end-user requested this T-code.
Thanks.

Nothing needs to be fixed - the transaction is called behind the scenes when the user uses FBV0 to post a parked document. Users should never call FBVB directly.
Andrew

System.InvalidCastException: Operator ' =' is not defined for type 'Byte()' and type 'Integer'.

I'm getting the following error
System.InvalidCastException: Operator '>=' is not defined for type 'Byte()' and type 'Integer'.
at Microsoft.VisualBasic.CompilerServices.Operators.InvokeObjectUserDefinedOperator(UserDefinedOperator Op, Object[] Arguments)
at Microsoft.VisualBasic.CompilerServices.Operators.InvokeUserDefinedOperator(UserDefinedOperator Op, Object[] Arguments)
at Microsoft.VisualBasic.CompilerServices.Operators.CompareObjectGreaterEqual(Object Left, Object Right, Boolean TextCompare)
at Customer_Fee_Calculator.Form1.GetCost2(Object dimension) in C:\Users\Chris\Documents\Visual Studio 2013\Projects\Customer Fee Calculator\Customer Fee Calculator\Form1.vb:line 259
at Customer_Fee_Calculator.Form1.CustomerSelect_SelectedIndexChanged(Object sender, EventArgs e) in C:\Users\Chris\Documents\Visual Studio 2013\Projects\Customer Fee Calculator\Customer Fee Calculator\Form1.vb:line 72
Dim inotes = rs1("INOTES").Value
(Line 72) If inotes.Length > 1 Then
cost = GetCost2(rs1("INOTES").Value)(0)
desc = GetCost2(rs1("INOTES").Value)(1)
Else
PkgType = CInt(rs1("PKGTYPE").Value)
cost = GetCost(PkgType)(0)
desc = GetCost(PkgType)(1)
End If
Function GetCost2(dimension)
Dim tempSql1, rs1
Dim MyResult As New ArrayList
Select Case dimension
(line 259) Case 1 To 24
tempSql1 = "SELECT * FROM PRODUCT WHERE PRODUCTID = 13"
Case 25 To 43
tempSql1 = "SELECT * FROM PRODUCT WHERE PRODUCTID = 14"
Case 44 To 71
tempSql1 = "SELECT * FROM PRODUCT WHERE PRODUCTID = 16"
Case 72 To 120
tempSql1 = "SELECT * FROM PRODUCT WHERE PRODUCTID = 17"
Case 121 To 499
tempSql1 = "SELECT * FROM PRODUCT WHERE PRODUCTID = 18"
Case 500
tempSql1 = "SELECT * FROM PRODUCT WHERE PRODUCTID = 19"
Case Else
tempSql1 = "SELECT * FROM PRODUCT WHERE PRODUCTID = 14"
End Select
rs1 = dbconnect(tempSql1, 1)
MyResult.Add(rs1("RETAIL1").Value)
MyResult.Add(rs1("DESCRIPTION").Value)
MyResult.Add(rs1("PRODUCTID").Value)
rs1 = Nothing
tempSql1 = Nothing
Return MyResult
End Function

Chris,
I'm not a database guy - so in many ways, I'm not really qualified to answer this, but I'll make a suggestion anyway:
At the very top of your code, put the following:
Option Strict On
Option Explicit On
Option Infer Off
With strict on and infer off, it will force you declare types - which I see missing in many places in the code.
It's entirely possible that by you then going through and fixing those issues, you'll have corrected the problem.
I don't know that, but it's possible -- and it should be done this way anyway, so there's certainly no harm to be done; in fact you'll actually speed up the program to a small degree because objects don't have to be inferred for the type that they actually
are.
***** EDIT *****
Also this: DON'T declare any of the types simply as "Object"; that's just trading off late binding for boxing, so you haven't really done much good. Declare them each as their correct actual type.
Still lost in code, just at a little higher level.

Exception '1003' is not defined for method 'SENDTASKDESCRIPTION' object type 'SELFITEM'

Hi All,
Please help me in this. I am trying to send a mail when user rejected the item in his inbox. I am getting error like
Exception '1003' is not defined for method 'SENDTASKDESCRIPTION' object type 'SELFITEM'. I tried so many ways like no attachments,send express ,siganture,encryption all disabled but still the same error from user outbox who ever rejects it.
Regards,
Madhu.

Hi Madhu,
This exception is raised means you have checked the Signature check-box and encrypt check box.
Now you have unchecked that the issue should be solved , but if it is still giving the same exception synchronize your run time buffer using the t-code SWU_OBUF .
Let me know if the issue is still there.
Regards
Bikas

Method 'PROCESS' is not defined for object type 'BUS2081'

Hi All,
I am using a workflow for incoming invoice approval using WS20001004. I prepared one version for this. The standard business methos bus2081 i delegated to zbus2081. Here i placed one decision step for reject or approve. In the same task in inbox i can see the document i can see as attachment. Now the issue is after seeing the attachment when i click on task in my inbox it status is changed to red and i can not process it further.In log i can see the error like Method 'PROCESS' is not defined for object type 'BUS2081'. This method i do not have in standard or in delegated one. I was struck here. Pleas help in this.
Regards,
Madhu.

Hi,
"Here i placed one decision step for reject or approve." if your workitem is based on standard user decision step type of workflow, then the business object in underlying task should be 'DECISION' and method should be 'PROCESS'. I think in the task you have put your custom business object instead of business object 'DECISION'. This could be the reason you are facing error.
Regards,
Ibrahim

FBVB not defined for direct call-up error

Hi All,
user are getting the message 'Transaction FBVB not defined for direct call-up' while running transaction FBVB .What does this mean.Even i am also getting the same error while running FBVB . Can somebody tell what does this error mean .
Thanks.
Chitta

Hey,
I hope you have got a reason for the message from sapfans & ittoolbox aswell.
Br,
sri

Err in PO creation-Sales document item is not defined for this transaction

Dear Consultants the errror occurs when we process Individual Purchase Order scenario.
Err in PO creation-Sales document item is not defined for this transaction
Thanks&Regards,
SanthaRam

This error because the item category is not determined correctly in the sales order.
Check the item category in Sales order line item, for Individual Purchase order scenario its TAB.
If its not TAB, then check the assignement for Item category in VOV4.
This thread is more of the SD part, so also put it in SD forum for better solutions.
Regards,
Sheetal

My app went from working fine to: Id field not defined for cfc Path.to.my.ORMCfCPag when I restarted

Hi everyone,
I have a CF9 ORM problem that I haven't been able to figure out and thought I'd see if you had any idea. I have seen a few postings talking about a "similar" problem but none of them correctly resolved this particular issue. I appreciate any help you can offer.
I recently created a CF9 app where I generated scripted ORM CFCs for my app using ColdFusion Builder. It worked great and my app was completely working. However, when I was adding some enhancements, I ran into an error when I restarted the CF app server. Here's the message I keep getting:
"Id field not defined for cfc Path.to.my.ORMCfCPage. Either the table should have a PK column mapped to a cfc field OR at least one field should be specified as id."
My App.cfc file only had orm enabled (no other mappings) when it was working. I've since tried specifying things like the cfc location etc. and it still hasn't helped.
// MORE DETAILS:
- When my app was working, I had moved it to 2 other servers. I had this error on both of those but not on my local copy. They all use the exact same database.
- The last change I made before the error was adding a generator="identity" field to my generated ORM beans. Once I got the message, I tried changing it back and restarting again but still got the error.
- I've also made sure all of the Adobe tags are in my web root (as suggested in a prior posting about this problem). I've search all over for a solution and nobody has a solution posted online that works so far.
Do you have any idea why this is happening?
Thanks!
Jeff

Quick thought and probably not relevant, but do you have this.ormsettings.savemapping set to true in your Application.cfc? I've fallen foul of this before - once CF has generated the hbmxml files and saved them to disk you can make all kinds of changes to your code which won't make a difference as it'll continue to read from the file versions, but only for certain properties and methods at times it seems.
Long shot I know, but I found CF ORM to be a nightmare for seemingly random caching.

Error : Excise modvat accounts not defined for GRPO transaction and U1 exci

I have Created Impot PO, After Planned Delivery cost MIRO I am trying to Perform GR then its giving Error "Excise modvat accounts not defined for GRPO transaction and U1 excise group
Message no. 8I402"
I have already maintained GL account in "Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction" for Excise group U1
This problem is coming when Additional Duty on custom condition type JADC is maintained in "Maintain Excise Defaults" node in the column "ADC Cond" . If I remove JADC condition type from this place the this error is not coming but AED column is not fetching any value while doing GR.
Please help me in this issue , still No answer
Edited by: shiwanshu singh on Jan 28, 2009 10:26 AM

Dear sir
For GRPO have you maintained sub transaction Type IP for your excise group U1. If you not maintained pl maintain . and assign G/L account to modvat clearing account , the G/l account should be same as company code CVD account.
Regards
jrp

"Role not defined for individual users" on user import

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for