Roles for unit test

Hi all,
I need to create users and assign role for unit test client. But I do not known which roles I have to assign to them. If you know, pls tell me.
Thanks alot.

Hello,
it depends on what they want to test. You cannot give SAPALL for them.
Create users in SU01
Create roles in PFCG
Mass change users in SU10
Regards,
Ravi

Similar Messages

Better UI for Unit Tests

I've been doing a lot of unit tests lately. Right now I'm working on a code converter Air app and I'm constantly creating unit tests for bugs I'm finding and running them, and debugging them when they don't work. When I debug, it's easiest to isolate the runner to run only one test. I know I can do that by editing the source file and typing in the test name in the core.run call. However, I can't help by think a better UI is needed for doing this form for TestDriven Development.
Basically, what I think would be perfect, is to have the UI, not run the tests initially. It should provide you with a list of tests with checkboxes. Then give you the opportunity to select which ones you want to run, and then run them. It should also have the ability to re-run a test. I realize that for any code changes to take affect you would need to re-run the entire app, but a lot of times, I find myself running the same test over and over and stepping through the code with the debugger in order to figure out what's going on. Then I eventually change the code.
Also, the new UI should persist the last set of selected tests, and maybe have a way to store previous selections. That would make it perfect for how I use it.
Does anyone agree or disagree with this? Has someone done this already?
BTW, the reason I'm using the stand alone runner and not the one in Flash Builder 4 is because I've run into some bugs with the FlexUnit shipped with Flash Builder 4 and there doesn't seem to be a way to get the latest FlexUnit 4.1 to work properly with Flash Builder 4. There seems to be a way to do it with Flash Builder 4.5, but I don't have that version.
Thanks,
Mark

On 05/08/2012 03:56 PM, prakash jv wrote:
> We have been looking for unit test framework for unit testing SWT
> components in our RCP application developed in eclipse galileo 3.5.
>
> We found SWTBot supports the better UI testing and wanted to additional
> details reagrding its support for maven 2.2.1.
>
> Does SWTBot work with projects which are mavenized with maven 2.2.1?
>
> Our aim of adding the unit tests for UI components is for better build
> quality. So we would want these Unit tests to be run everytime we build
> our assembly. As of now we use Junit4 for running our JUnits and they
> run with maven outside eclipse.
>
> Does SWTBot support running the UI unit tests outside eclipse using maven?
Hi
in
http://code.google.com/a/eclipselabs.org/p/emf-components/
we run swtbot tests with maven/tycho
hope this helps
cheers
Lorenzo
Lorenzo Bettini, PhD in Computer Science, DI, Univ. Torino
ICQ# lbetto, 16080134 (GNU/Linux User # 158233)
HOME: http://www.lorenzobettini.it MUSIC: http://www.purplesucker.com
http://www.myspace.com/supertrouperabba
BLOGS: http://tronprog.blogspot.com http://longlivemusic.blogspot.com
http://www.gnu.org/software/src-highlite
http://www.gnu.org/software/gengetopt
http://www.gnu.org/software/gengen http://doublecpp.sourceforge.net

Support for unit testing object types

There's a Feature Request that suggests expanding the unit test tool to object types:
Title
Provide object type support for unit tests
Description
In the current version (2.1.0.63) I can perform only unit test for packages, function and procedures. But we use a lot of object types in the database and would like to test them. When is a support for object types scheduled?
Average Rating
10
Development Comment
This is planned for the next release.
Status
Scheduled for 3.0
Although the status suggests inclusion in v3, in my current version 3.2.20.09 there is nothing.
This is clearly an important issue for those who have voted for it as it scores a perfect 10 on average rating.
Is there any sign of object types being supported in the 4.0EA1 release? There is a strong desire within my organisation to move to a more object-based approach to PL/SQL coding but until we are able to unit test easily there will be no real progress.

If you are ready to learn a little bit of Ruby then you can try [PL/SQL unit testing with Ruby|http://blog.rayapps.com/2009/11/27/oracle-plsql-unit-testing-with-ruby/]. ruby-plsql library [supports also PL/SQL object types|http://blog.rayapps.com/2009/11/25/more-oracle-data-types-supported-by-ruby-plsql-gem/] as input and output parameters and return values.

Error while TOC created when change document approvle for UNIT testing

Hi All,
During change document approval for unit testing, we are getting error, when I checked in detail, it is giving error for transport of copies error as below
it seems to be getting locked with original transport,
also I can't see change in transport of copies
Does someone has any idea?
Dinesh

Hello Dinesh,
Perhaps the tasks of the Transport Request were not released.
Try to release the tasks only (from your DEV system), then choose action "Pass normal change to test". This will generate a ToC to be transported into your QAS.
Then from the Task List, you can schedule the background job to import the ToC into QAS system.
Regards,
Daniel

[svn:osmf:] 15899: Attempted fix for unit tests failure.

Revision: 15899
Revision: 15899
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2010-05-04 17:21:06 -0700 (Tue, 04 May 2010)
Log Message:
Attempted fix for unit tests failure.
Modified Paths:
    osmf/trunk/framework/OSMFTest/org/osmf/OSMFTests.as

Tool for Unit Testing

Hi,
Is there any tool for unit testing.
Thanks
krish

Hi Krish,
Check the below help file for testing.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/1b/e81c3b84e65e7be10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Raghu

Suggestions requested for Unit Testing process and build processes.

Hi All,
We are using WebLogic WorkShop 8.1 SP2 to build our WebApp. One thing I am trying
to get together is a "Best Practises" list for aspects of WorkShop developement,
particularly Unit Testing, Continous Build methodology, source control management
etc.I have been through the "Best Practises Guide" that comes in WorkShop help,
but it doesnt address these issues.This could help us all for future projects.
1)Could anyone give pointers on how to perform Unit Testing using either JUnit/JUnitEE
in the WorkShop realm, given that Controls cannot be accessed directly from PO
Test classes.
2)For a project of size say 5 developers ,does it make sense to have a nightly
build using tools like CruiseControl?We use CVS for our source control and its
working out pretty well, but given that we currently have no Unit Tests that can
be run after the build and that can provide some reports on what broke/what didnt?
I am sure we all would appreciate any suggestions and more questions on this topic.
Thanks,
Vik.

Hi, Chris,
can you perhaps explain your solution in greater detail. I am really curious to
find a way to test controls.
"Chris Pyrke" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
I have written (well it's a bit of a dirty hack really) something that
lends itself
to the name ControlTest (it unit tests controls). Its a blend of Junit
and Cactus
with some of the source of each brutalised a bit to get things to work
(not much
- it was a couple of hours work, when I was supposed to be doing something
else).
To write a control test you code something like...
package com.liffe;
import com.liffe.controlunit.ControlTestCase;
import controls.Example;
public class TestExample extends ControlTestCase
private Example example = null;
public void setUp() {
example = (Example)getControl("example");
public void testExample() {
this.assertNotNull(example);
String result = example.getData();
assertEquals(result, "Happy as Larry");
Other tasks required to set up a test are creating a web project with
a jpf which
needs some cut and paste code (14 lines) in its begin method and a jsp
which is
also cut and paste (5 lines). (ie create a standard web project and paste
in 2
pieces of code)
In the web project you need to create a control (A) with an instance
name of controlContainer.
(if it's called something else the pasted in code will need changing
to reflect)
In this control you need to put an instance of TestContainerImpl and
any controls
that need testing.
You then need to add a method to the control (A) that looks like…
* @common:operation
public String controlTestRun(String theSuiteClassName, boolean xsl)
container.setControl("example", example);
return container.controlTestRun(theSuiteClassName, xsl);
You need to call container.setControl for each control being tested and
the object
'container' is the instance name of the TestContainerImpl that was put
in.
There are 4 jars (junit, cactus etc) that go in the library. You will
also need
the ControlUnitBase project (or maybe just it's jar).
To use you call a URL like:
http://localhost:7001/TestWeb/Controller.jpf?test=com.liffe.TestExample
TestWeb is the name I gave to my web project - this will be different
for each
test project
com.liffe.Example is the class above and will therefore be different
for each
test case.
You can also call
http://localhost:7001/TestWeb/Controller.jpf?test=com.liffe.TestExample&xsl=true
(Note the extra &xsl=true) and the browser will (if it can) render it
more prettily.
This seems to do the job quite nicely, but there are several caveats
I would hope
someone from bea would be able to address before I start using it widely.
1) To access the control you need to create it (eg as a subcontrol in
the control
(A) above.
To get it into the test case you need to pass it round as an Object (can't
return
Control from a control operation). As it's being passed around among
Java (POJO)
classes I'm assuming that control remains in the control container context
so
this is OK. It seems to work and the Object is some form of proxy as
any control
seems to be reproxied before the control is invoked from the test case.
2) If I'm testing controls called from a JPD then they either need to
be in a
control project (and my test cases called from a Web Project) which makes
for
a large increase in project numbers (we already have this and are trying
to resist
it) To avoid this - as a process project is a brain damaged web project
I simply
perform some brain surgery and augment the process project with some
standard
files found in any old web project. this means I can call the test JPF
from a
browser. This seems nasty, is there a better way?
3) I would like to be able to deliver without the test code. At the worst
the
code can be in place but must be inacessible in a production environment.
I don't
know how best to do this - any suggestions (without creating lots of
projects,
or lots of manual effort)
If anyone has read this far I would ask the question does this seem like
the kind
of thing that would be useful?
Hopefully a future version of workshop will have something to enable
unit testing
and this hacking will be unnecessary.
Could someone from BEA tell me if this is a dangerous way to do things?
Chris
"vik" <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi All,
We are using WebLogic WorkShop 8.1 SP2 to build our WebApp. One thing
I am trying
to get together is a "Best Practises" list for aspects of WorkShop developement,
particularly Unit Testing, Continous Build methodology, source control
management
etc.I have been through the "Best Practises Guide" that comes in WorkShop
help,
but it doesnt address these issues.This could help us all for future
projects.
1)Could anyone give pointers on how to perform Unit Testing using either
JUnit/JUnitEE
in the WorkShop realm, given that Controls cannot be accessed directly
from PO
Test classes.
2)For a project of size say 5 developers ,does it make sense to have
a nightly
build using tools like CruiseControl?We use CVS for our source control
and its
working out pretty well, but given that we currently have no Unit Tests
that can
be run after the build and that can provide some reports on what broke/what
didnt?
I am sure we all would appreciate any suggestions and more questions
on this topic.
Thanks,
Vik.

Possible to have multiple cluster members in the same JVM (for unit tests)?

Hi,
I'm wondering if it's possible to simulate multiple cluster members inside of a single JVM. I'm looking to unit test my code and it would be great to write cases for various boundary conditions.
This could certainly be done with multiple JVMs but would be more difficult to run in something like cruise control etc.
TIA,
Danny

Hi Danny,
I do not know how to accomplish what you are asking for and run several Coherence nodes in a single JVM, but I have written a JUnit base class that starts a configurable number of nodes (each in its own JVM) and provides some other useful methods for unit/integration testing with Coherence, such as method to clear all caches or to load test data from the CSV file.
It is still a work in progress and you might need to tweak things a bit to make it work in your environment, but it will at least give you a head start.
Shoot me an email if you are interested and I'll send it to you (you can find my email in my profile).
Regards,
Aleks

Best Practices for unit testing an Xlet?

I'd like to be able to unit test and Xlet using JUnit, but have been stumped by how this can be done correctly.
The first inclination is that I should mock the XletContext, but that seems to be getting out of control quickly.
Does anyone have any tips on this they can point me to?
Thanks.

Hi Jean-Paul Smit,
Here is a goog article about how to unit test SQL Server 2008 database using Visual Studio 2010, please see:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/atverma/archive/2010/07/28/how-to-unit-test-sql-server-2008-database-using-visual-studio-2010.aspx
Thanks,
Eileen
TechNet Subscriber Support
If you are
TechNet Subscription user and have any feedback on our support quality, please send your feedback
here.

Sample Unit Tests on Role Redesign

Hi All,
I'm working in a Project in which we undertaken the resposibility of creating new set of roles and the new roles are built.
Now, the client is asking for unit tests.
Can someone please provide me with some "sample unit tests" for this Role Redesign.
Regards,
Preethi

Hi,
Speak to the test team on your project, they will have templates, methods etc.
Basic steps are
1. Login with appropriate user & role
2. Run transaction to completion. If errors then capture input data & actions & corresponding error messages (texts, SU53's etc).
3. Fix & retest if required, include SU24 changes etc
Your security team will be able to help with any of the above that is new to you.

Required Unit test Plan for Data migration

Dear All,
I am looking for unit test plan Draft documents/templates which covers
1. Testing tools
2. Methods
3. Error handling
4. Reviews and approvals
The project is a Oracle 10g data migration from one schema to another schema.
It will be a greate help if anyone can forward the same to me.
Thank you.

Hi Vaishali,
You may wish to refer the links below...
https://service.sap.com/instguides --> SAP NetWeaver --> Release 2004s --> Upgrade
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/developerareas/bi
latest on upgrade tp BI7.0
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/2e8e5288-0b01-0010-2ea8-bcd4df5084a7
Upgrading BW 3.X to SAP NetWeaver 2004s BI (PDF 2.6 MB)
Front End Migration strategy
Here's the migration strategy: Rolling out the New SAP NetWeaver 2004s BI Frontend Tools
Presentation
http://csc-studentweb.lrc.edu/swp/Berg/Articles/PM_2006_upgrade_NW2004s_Bjarne_Berg_v12.ppt
Here are the frontend requirements:
Troubleshoot the SAP NetWeaver 2004s BI Frontend Installation
Here are the backend requirements in the product availabilty matrix:
https://websmp110.sap-ag.de/~form/handler?_APP=00200682500000001303&_EVENT=DISP_NEW&00200682500000002804=01200615320900001250
Migration of Web Teplates
832713 - Migration of Web templates from BW 3.x to Netweaver
Assign points if this helps.
Regards,
Anil

Problem creating unit testing repository (and workaround)

I tried to create the unit testing repository with a user that had all the required system privileges granted through a different role other than RESOURCE and CONNECT roles, and who wasn't explicitely granted CREATE VIEW, but inherited it through the custom role. However the check in SQL Developer is explicitely for the RESOURCE and CONNECT roles (regardless of what privileges they have granted to them in whichever database version past, present or future) and for CREATE VIEW privilege granted direct to the user:
SELECT DECODE (roles.required_role_count + privs.required_priv_count,
               3, 1,
               0)
          AS basic_privs_granted
FROM (SELECT COUNT (*) AS required_role_count
          FROM user_role_privs
         WHERE granted_role IN ('CONNECT', 'RESOURCE')) roles,
       (SELECT COUNT (*) AS required_priv_count
          FROM USER_SYS_PRIVS
         WHERE privilege IN ('CREATE VIEW')) privsI found this SQL contained within the sqldeveloper/extensions/oracle.sqldeveloper.unit_test.jar in an XML file: oracle/dbtools/unit_test/manage_user/UserSql.xml and replaced the SQL with one that actually checks for the specific system privileges:
SELECT DECODE (required_sys_priv_count,
               10, 1,
               0)
          AS basic_privs_granted
FROM
       (SELECT COUNT(*) AS required_sys_priv_count FROM
         (SELECT privilege
            FROM role_sys_privs
           WHERE privilege IN ('CREATE CLUSTER','CREATE INDEXTYPE','CREATE OPERATOR','CREATE PROCEDURE','CREATE SEQUENCE','CREATE SESSION','CREATE TABLE','CREATE TRIGGER','CREATE TYPE','CREATE VIEW')
          UNION
          SELECT privilege
            FROM user_sys_privs
           WHERE privilege IN ('CREATE CLUSTER','CREATE INDEXTYPE','CREATE OPERATOR','CREATE PROCEDURE','CREATE SEQUENCE','CREATE SESSION','CREATE TABLE','CREATE TRIGGER','CREATE TYPE','CREATE VIEW')))This enabled me to bypass that check when creating the respository. I don't know if all these privileges are actually required by the unit testing repository or not, so maybe the above list can be reduced...
Edited by: RDB on Mar 1, 2013 2:24 PM

Hi Sai Vineeth,
First of all, I appreciate your elaborate way of framing the question. That itself helps others to comment.
On the first two questions, I am sure you'll be able to follow the answers provided and take care of your concerns.
On your question 3), an additional piece of information that should bring smile to you
Whether the Test is to happen in DEV or QAS or whatever 'System Role' is dependent on the Test Plan.
So, if you have two distinct Test Plans, one for Unit Tests and the other for Integration Tests, which should be the case, as usual, you can certainly point the System Role to DEV or QAS as required.
Feel free to pose any other query as well.
Best regards,
Srini

Unit testing and Issue on ODS

Hi every one,
I was asked to do Unit testing on all the objects I created which includes data loading, checking the structure.....etc...If any one has any template for Unit testing pls forward it to me [email protected].....
My ods is designed with out checking "Activate ODS data immeaditely".....and we r not using process chains here...
while testing data loads when ever we send data data to that ODS how do u activate it thru jobs automatically????
if we give Job selection it may not work out right, cos we don't know when we load data....so can I make use of events so that when ever data comes to ODS I need to activate it and it has to push that data to other ODS...can anyone throw some light on the events and what even to use for automatic activation....
If any one has any template pls forward it to the above ID
Thanks in advance

BW
Doing unit test is simple. Just document what ever the steps you follow while loading your ODS. You could follow these steps
1 . Check the functionality of your Infosource whether it is full or Delta Take a screen shot.
2.   Check Delta Load Functionality if you have any Delta extractors.
4     . Schedule the Info Package
5     Go to Manage Data targets and see whether ODS got loaded successfully or not.
6     Check if it is activated or Not. In your case it will automatically gets activated since you selected automatic activation.
Dont forget to take screen shots of each Process
Hope this helps
Thanks
Sat

Unit testing UIX

Hi Steve
Can you advice me a tool for unit testing my UIX pages apart from HttpUnit and HtmlUnit frameworks?
HttpUnit gives javascript errors. HtmlUnit is not practical for the complex HTML produced from a UIX page.
Thanks

Cactuz?

Unit Testing in DAC

Hi,
I am facing a problem in unit testing in DAC. I am able to run full loads and incremental but i am unable to do unit testing in DAC. It shows an error that my Integration Services are not up when i run an individual task . Are there any setups for unit testing in DAC. I had followed http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E15586_01/fusionapps.1111/e14849/dacquickstart.htm#BABCIIIH topic : To unit test an execution plan task. If any one would help me in running a unit test that would be a great help.
Thanks,
Ram

I'm struggling with the idea of testing View/Controller classes which depend on "container things" like bindings. Since there are many ways to interact with the 'container things' I guess it depends on exactly how you're using those bindings in your View/Controller classes. I've had success using Mockito along with my own fixture classes that do things like set up a mock ADFContext and RequestContext. Within my test setUp and tearDown, I set up and tear down these fixture classes, which results in a safe, mocked-out environment in which the test can execute. It's often tricky because many of the these objects are static and singleton-like, but so far I've always found a back door by which to inject a mock object. We also have our own utility classes that look-up 'container things', so we of course make sure we have a way to provide mock 'container things' through those utility classes.
If you haven't come across the concept of 'mock objects' before, then it may be best to do a bit of background reading first:
[http://www.mockobjects.com/2009/09/brief-history-of-mock-objects.html]
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mock_object]
There are many mocking libraries about (EasyMock, jMock, rMock) but IMO Mockito is the one to choose right now.
Of course, the alternative is to apply some [Inversion of Control|http://martinfowler.com/articles/injection.html] and make sure that the code you right is always ignorant of exactly where the 'container things' have come from. This makes mocking much easier, but I've not yet investigated use of a D.I. container (e.g. Spring) along with ADF - I suspect your options in 10g would be limited.

Roles for unit test

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for