Rounding difference in down payment for header condition

We have header condition, marked as "group condition" for traqnsport. But when doing down payment the system calculates incorrectly - for example I enter transport $600 at header level, but because the system calculates it at item level and due to rounding, in the 50% down payment invoice it shows - 300.02. Obviously when the customer receives down payment invoice that says pay 50% of some amount and the amount to be paid is not actually 50% it would be a problem. How could this be solved? We tried modifying the form, but as the it reads values from the system which are incorrect that didn't help.

Hello,
Please check the customizing:
Financial Accounting -> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable
-> Business Transactions -> Down Payment Received -> Define
Reconciliation Accounts for Customer Down Payments
Regards,
Raghavendra

Similar Messages

Down payments for header data in Me23n

Hi experts,
can any one please let me know the table from which down payment displays in status of header data in me23n transaction. As i got the requirement to add down payment field in report for the status that down payment exists(some value) or not(zero).
As its structure is mepo1235 and fieldname is value05 but i couldnot find the table name.I tried to debug the me23n transaction but failed to get one.
please friends help me out in this problem.
advanced
thanks
vijay

thank you,
sukriti for your reply.
but i need to calculate the sum of all these down payments. But the problem is some are negetive and some are positive. But in table EKBE negetive values are displayed as positive so im finding problem in calculating them.
i will be very thank ful to you for giving me reply.
regards
vijay

How to create down payment for contract

Hi Gurus,
Can any one tell me the process of Initial Down Payment
for Value Contract?

Hi Marcin,
As far I know, the functionality of entering down payment in header will not allow you to post the DPR at header level, it has been given an option to enter the DPR as against at line item level available before.
Looking from a logical point of view, if a PO has more than one line item then then how to determine against which item the DPR has been entered, there may be line items with different delivery dates say one line item requires a down payment to be made, and the other doesn't and also it may come in much before than the item against which the DPR has been made, then it will be a mess for Finance to decide whether to pay for this item or balance the invoice against DPR.
Regards
Chandra Shekhar

Down payment for auc

Hi,
I have one purchase order which has an asset under construction. i want to make down payment for a vendor for this particular purchase order. But when i go for F-47 and enter spl. gl : A and give reference of Purchase order it gives me an error that down payment not possible for this class of assets.
I also tried for for spl GL B and M. but not working. Pls help.
sonali.

Dear Sonali,
Please check if you have maintained GL account assignment for Down Payments clearing account in AO90.
Assign points, if useful.

Problem of Down Payment for the Asset under Construction

Hi All:
My problem is, after do down payment for the AuC, we got an additional amount under the values booked of AuC, double checked the accounting document, found that system generated two items when doing actual settlement with t-code CJ88, for example, when display asset value, system lists the value as follows:
Net book value: 194,325 (Normally only has this value under the AuC)
Down payment: 93,950
I don't know why? And how to balance the asset values? Please give me some hint, thanks in advance.
Thanks
Kai
Edited by: Kai Jiang on Jan 14, 2009 6:52 AM

Hi,
I think the system behavior is right ! When posting the final invoice and clearing the down payment the additional items (Down payment: 93,950) were cleared. Go ahead!
Good luck
Tao

MIRO Down Payment for PUrchase order ********* Exist

Dear all,
I have made PO with three line items in that third line item i have done the down payment.
i have made GRN and done Invoice for all the three line items.
My question user is again doing the miro for the same particular po. Now system throwing a error message saying that
Down Payment for PUrchase order ********* Exist M8138.
But my user id i was trying to do the same its not showing anything.
What could be the reason and SPRO Invoice verification--sytem attribute message i was checking there. It was not maintained this error message How system will bring this message in MIRO.
Could you pls clarify my doubt.

Thanks Kunal.
If duplicate entry exist also why its showing for only one User. Becos my user id its not showing that error message.
Then above message i have told that i havnt maintained any message M8. But where its picking this error message

Down payment for Normal Assets

Dear Experts,
I have an issue on Down payment for Fixed Asset.
User created an Fixed Asset (Normal Asset) which is not a AUC Asset.Created a P.O and Assigned that Asset into the P.O. Now he want to post the downpayment request for the same through F-47. Now they are getting the below error.
You cannot use this transaction type to post to this asset
Message no. AA 834
Diagnosis
The transaction type entered belomgs to transaction type group 15. It has been specified for this transaction type group, that it is only allowed to post to asset classes for which it has been explicitly allowed (for example, the asset class for assets under construction). The asset to which you are posting belongs to class 46 (chart of depreciation XXX). You cannot post to this asset class using the transaction type entered.
Procedure
Check the asset number you entered. You may want to allow posting to this asset class using this transaction type group.
here i have the below doubts.
1. Can we assign the other than AUC Asset Class in OAYB for down payment (Group 15). but the system is showing the AUC Asset Classes only.
2. Can we assign GL Accounts for Down payment and down payment clearing accounts in AO85 other than AUC Asset Classes also? becasue if i check F1 help for those fields its saying only for AUC Asset Classes.
Kindly help me for how to do the down payment for Normal Assets.
regards,
Gopi.P

Hi,
I have a simple solution for you, which treats your down payments made to asset POs also same manner as down payments to normal POs.
Please check the below thread.
[Asset Downpayment;
Regards,
Srinu

Workflow for approval of down payment for outward freight

Can somebody suggest if is there any standard workflow available or not for approval of down payment for outward freight in SAP system? I want to build a workflow for this purpose upto two level of approval.
Thanks & Regards,
Manas

Hi Manas,
There is business object BSEG for down payment request. Try to use that and u can find workflow as Arghadip said in other thread. In PFTC u can go for F4 and search.

Depreciation is calculated on Down payment for asset

Dear friends,
While i am making down payment for Asset to the vendor through transaction code F-48, the depreciation is calculated on the advance amount what i posted.
Please advice me ???
Regards
Mrutyunjaya

Dear Bernhard,
This setting is for new document. what about my old document which has already been given advance to the vendor and depreciation is calculated.
Ex- I have given Advance to the vendor for Asset on 22.01.2009 of Rs 165000 and depreciation rate is 4.75%, and on 16.02.2009 i receive the Asset from the vendor and invoice cleared against advance. System is showing bellow value.
Date         Amount               Dep Value
22.01.2009   Rs. 165000           Rs. 1959-
16.02.2009   Rs. 165000           Rs. 1959
Please advice me how to make rectification of depreciation amount on that asset.
Regards
Mrutyunjaya

Down payment for asset plant and machinery

Dear Experts,
Can any body help me,   i have one issue user posted one asset po , in po asset is assigned,    now they are posting to that po some advance through f-48,   my asset class is plant and machinery, with No AUC option ,   this advance amount is posting to asset also and caluting deprection,   it should not post to asset and calculate depreciation.
regards
chandu

Dear AP,
thanks for your reply, my p.o account assignment is asset "A".   i need to track the down payament in P.O history.
In t.code F-48 second screen p.o reference we are giving automatically what we asset no. assing in p.o that is displaying.   If i revome also again it is coming and posting to asset and caluclting depreciation.   please suggest without post asset how to do the down payment for asset p.o.
please suggest
Regards
Chandu.

DOWN PAYMENT FOR CUSTOMERS

Hi
Can anyone send me a write up on the standard down payment creation, reciept and clearing the same against customer invoice in SAP?
My email id is [email protected]
Regards
Sanil Bhandari

1 - Down Payment Request for Customers Use TC: F-37
Here you create Noted Item this line item you can use wile creating Down Payment
2 - Down Payment Use TC:F-29
3 - Transfor SP Gl to Normal by Clearing of SP GL Use TC: F-39
4 - By clearing of Normal Gl : F-32
5 - Incoming Payment Use TC: F-28
These are the Process for Down Payment for Customers,
i hope you this is use ful for you,
Thanks,
TML

Down payment for Serivice Call!

Hi all!
I have a problem a bout services call. This is senarior of my customer.
Before create Service Call, they have Down payment for service (not for Item) and then they create Service Call in next step.
When they delivery some item( For Item) for Service Call and finish this service Call. Finaly, they want to create A/R invoice for this Service Call.
Now, i don't know apply down payment that done before for this A/R invoice for Service Call.
Can you help me what way to solve this problem???
Thank you!

Hi Tien,
You can use the std Downpayment Invoice feature for your scenario.
1. Create Service type A/R Downpayment invoice
2. Receive downpayment from Customer
2. After completion of service, Create an A/R invoice and apply the Downpayment Invoice before adding the invoice.
System allows even if the A/R invoice is item and the A/R Downpayment invoice is of service type.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Hamsa

Down payment for Stock Vendors

Hi,
I need to create a down payment for stock vendors, If I create an invoicing plan but then I get this error saying "Invoicing plan not possible in case of GR-based invoice verification".
My scenario is that do make down payments to Stock vendors based on POs, is there any other way of nadling down payments for stock vendors.
thanks

Use transaction F-48 to create the down payment for Vendor.
than once you post the invoice it will know off the downpayment amount when the FI people clearing the invoice you posted.
You can post down payment aginst vendor with PO also.

Asset Down Payment for AUC

Hi,
I am having a query in Asset Down Payment for AUC
I have configured for both Acquisition: down payments and Down-payments clearing account in 'AO90' in asset module.
But I am still not clear why Down-payments clearing account account needs to be configured.
The entry I am getting are
1. F-47 DP request - I enter the Asset number here. Noted item.
2. F-48 -DP- an entry is created as follows:
Vendor     Dr     1000
Bank     Cr     1000
Acquisition: down payments     Dr     1000
Down-payments clearing account     Cr     1000
3. Now the Down-payments clearing account shows a credit balance all the time.
How should this be rectified
rgds
Vidhya

Hi Vidya,
Option 1: When you follow based on your example, ie., asset debited during down payment entry, asset entry will be reversed when you adjust down payment against invoice.
Option 2: Down payment request and down payment made against AUC asset with reference to Purchase order:
With reference to PO: Please refer sap note number 310368 valuated goods receipt paragraph and they have clearly mentioned about making down payments against asset/AUC purchase order without getting debited to asset account.
You have to make F5 378 message number to be a warning message instead of error message and you have to suppress asset related settings in OB41 posting keys 29 and 39. Posting key 39 is useful when you have down payment request.
If you have done this, then it will show only warning message during down payment that "purchase order is related to asset" and it will not be debited to asset account. Also after following the above steps, it is not necessary for you to give Acquisition: down payments G/L and Down payment clearing G/L in AO90 transaction code.
Hope this helps. Assign points if useful.
Regards,
Dwarak.

Automatic Pricing for Header condition

Hello,
We have the following scenario.
For an specific Sales Order type we need to charge (surcharge or a fee) a fix $$ amount at the header level. This amount should be charged only if the total value of the order is less then a fixed $$ amount.
Also another condition is for a specific material group we need to charge a fix $$ amount and if this condition is selected then the other condition should not be selected.
Eg:
1) for all material with Material group AB we want to charge(via condition type) 100$ at the header level.
we want this automatically at the header.
2) For all Order type OR we want to charge(I will maintain a condition type) 200$ if the net value of that sales order is less then 5000$. This is not item specific but at the Order header level.
We dont want to manually enter the condition type (surcharge).
I know that for Header conditions we cannot have access sequence and condition records. Then how can the 100$ or 200$ charge condition type come automatically in the Sales Order if the total order value is less then 5000$.
I can have a requirement but what about the condition Record and the access sequence for the Order type or the material group?
Any Ideas?
Thanks
SAP Fan

hello, friend.
i have an hypothesis (which is merely a guess because i have not tried this recently), that it is possible to do this, but you have make your condition type both header and item, which means you get to assign an access sequence (enabling condition records). but you must also "tick" the "group condition" in the condition type so that even if this is entered at item level, this applies to the entire document and will be distributed to the items.
the group condition is supposed to be used for manually entered header conditions such as pallet discounts, and i think i might have done this for material groups, but do not recall if i've done this for order type or any other variable at one point. please do us a favor and test it, and post your findings.
regards!!!
Edited by: jonathan y on Jun 1, 2009 3:08 PM

Rounding difference in down payment for header condition

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for