Rounding Difference Too High

Dear All,
I am having a problem in the vendor advance payment. When I try to post the document containing sales tax using the T-Code F-58 in a JVA related company the system gives the following error:
"Rounding Difference Too High".
The system is able to post the documents which do not contain the sales tax. It is also worth noting that the companies without JVA are able to post both kind of documents.
Please provide help regarding this issue.
Regards,
Anosh

Hi,
Looking at the error, it is JVA triggered.
G4 042 error could occur because of multiple reasons.
Without looking at the system, it would be difficult and would not be right to comment.
The solution as I can see is a 2 step approach,
1. Implement all the latest (release for all) notes handling G4 042. Simulate the test case.
2. If step1 doesnot help, please raise a OSS with SAP. The concerned expert can then comment on the issue
after debugging the program.
Regards,
Satyajit

Similar Messages

  • Error Rounding Difference too high when reset cleared document using FBRA

    My Client has posted cleared document with T_Code F-51. This cleared document has cleared 6040 open items.
    And now, they want to reset and reverse that cleared document.
    We found error "Rounding difference too high" when we are reset cleared document using FBRA.
    Kindly need your advice.
    Many thanks in advance.
    Regards,

    Hello,
    Please let me know the ERROR number.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Rounding difference too high   Message no. G4042

    Dear Experts
    When i am doing transcation F-04 post wtih clearing system gives message "Rounding difference too high " although entries are equal.
    Please reslove it as soon as possiable.
    Regards

    Hi,
    Looking at the error, it is JVA triggered.
    G4 042 error could occur because of multiple reasons.
    Without looking at the system, it would be difficult and would not be right to comment.
    The solution as I can see is a 2 step approach,
    1. Implement all the latest (release for all) notes handling G4 042. Simulate the test case.
    2. If step1 doesnot help, please raise a OSS with SAP. The concerned expert can then comment on the issue
    after debugging the program.
    Regards,
    Satyajit

  • Automatic Payment F110 error on Rounding Difference

    Dear SAP Experts,
    My client ECC6 is using automatic payment F110 to deliver payment documents.
    Sometimes, occasionally, the proposal of the automatic payment gets an error which stated in the proposal log as "Rounding Difference too High".
    This symptom can be fix if we refresh the witholding tax in the vendor line item in the WHT part. The refresh here is delete the WHT and save and then insert again and save the document.
    Anybody faced this issue before? What is the root of the problem. Since this problem come in random, like a bug in the system.
    Thanks before..

    Hello
    I don't understand when you say test printout. We have a proposal run and a payment run. And after the payment run is carried out you get the final print out as per the printout variant set in the parameters.
    So can you please provide details as to what is exactly required.
    Rgds

  • Video Bit Rate Too High

    According to the video-meter which indicates how much space is left on the DVD - in this case a single layer DVD-R, 4.7 GB - I have only used 3.7, so I have 1 GB to go and still the project won't build. As far as I know the green light in the Status column in the Asset tab means that the clip are good to go, am I wrong?
    I havetried to reduce the Bit Rate to minimum, just to test, and still DVDPS prompt with that it is too high.
    The following are my settings:
    Video System PAL
    Aspect Ratio: 16:9
    Field Order: Auto (we hate interlacing, don't we?)
    Mode: Two Pass VBR
    Bit Rate:6.0 mbps
    Max Bit Rate: 9.0 mbps
    Motion Estimation: Best
    And that would be the default setting?
    Any help will be thankful!

    Yeah..bitrate is so important. Just because your encoder indicates a high of 9.0 mb/s doesn't mean it won't go over that point from time to time - Every encoder introduced bitrate spikes (at least on occasions). You won't see a quality difference with 9.0 over 7.6 with encoders like Compressor. Do what Subquestion says and use AC3 audio unless your client absolutely demands it based on the content (concerts, audio titles, ect). With this you'll need to adjust for video bit rates to accommodate the higher audio bitrate.
    Message was edited by: Eric Pautsch1

  • Audio Input Gain Too High - Line Input

    Using GarageBand, I'm trying to record audio on the line level input. It records, but it's always too high. I can hear the distortion and see the clipping in GB. Using System Preferences Sound, I set the input level all the way to 0 and it makes no difference.
    My sound source is the line-level output of an 8 channel PA.
    Any ideas?

    Got it fixed, defective user

  • [SOLVED] Microphone recording level is too high

    Hi,
    since yesterday, I've got an issue with my headset's microphone (it's a QPAD QH-1339). The recording level is WAY too high, at 2 % level it's already starting to clip and I hear noise coming from the motherboard (a Lenovo ThinkPad T540p laptop). First I thought it might be a problem with PulseAudio but after testing with arecord I realized it seems to be ALSA related (same problem there).
    Here are my sound related packages:
    $ pacman -Ss alsa | grep Installiert
    extra/alsa-lib 1.0.28-1 [Installiert]
    extra/alsa-plugins 1.0.28-2 [Installiert]
    extra/alsa-utils 1.0.28-1 [Installiert]
    extra/pulseaudio-alsa 2-3 [Installiert]
    extra/zita-alsa-pcmi 0.2.0-1 [Installiert]
    multilib/lib32-alsa-lib 1.0.28-1 [Installiert]
    $ pacman -Ss pulse | grep Installiert
    extra/libao 1.2.0-1 [Installiert]
    extra/libcanberra-pulse 0.30-4 [Installiert]
    extra/libpulse 5.0-1 [Installiert]
    extra/pavucontrol 2.0-2 [Installiert]
    extra/pulseaudio 5.0-1 [Installiert]
    extra/pulseaudio-alsa 2-3 [Installiert]
    multilib/lib32-libpulse 5.0-1 [Installiert]
    lsusb:
    $ lsusb
    Bus 003 Device 003: ID 0d8c:000c C-Media Electronics, Inc. Audio Adapter
    ALSA and PulseAudio config files are stock; I've reinstalled alsa-lib, lib32-alsa-lib, libpulse, pulseaudio and lib32-libpulse already, making no difference. The built-in microphone seems to record just fine (apart from the horriblenot-so-great sound quality). It also seems to work somewhat if I set the recording level in the ALSA mixer to 100 % but Skype of course changes the recording level as it likes. When enabling the monitor (to hear myself) the sound quality from the headset's microphone is just perfect so I'm pretty puzzled what to try next.
    If you need more information, let me know. Thanks in advance!
    Thomas
    Last edited by volatile void (2014-12-31 14:12:49)

    TheSaint wrote:
    Very different from mine
    Try to set the capture level lower, you may do it by amixer or alsamixer or your systray applet.
    I think your card is non fully set.
    What says
    lspci -vnn |grep 'High Definition Audio'
    Try to disable pulseaudio and remove the module. See wiki and in particular this section.
    I know, their aren't the definitive solution, but we should have to toss a bit of straw from the haystack to find the needle.
    Well, I should point out that it's an USB headset with integrated audio controller (was a bit unclear in my first post, sorry). The sound card integrated in the laptop works just fine but the integrated microphone is awful (in a non-ALSA, non-PulseAudio way ) so showing you the output from lspci won't help much I suppose. But at least it has a Mic Boost control.
    Maybe it helps if I describe the behavior in the PulseAudio volume control in more detail.
    For the integrated sound card, the input level behaves linear (I know it's logarithmic but that's not the point ). At 0 %, it's completely quiet, at 100 %, it's clipping. In between, everything's fine.
    For the USB headset, 0 % is completely quiet, 1 % is clipping already, just getting worse until 40 % which is the ALSA base volume. There it's quiet but at least the volume indicator shows something. At 41 %, it's clipping again until 100 % which seems to behave like 40 %.
    Now as Skype thinks that 40 % is too quiet it changes the input level (reasonably enough I guess). Too bad that anything BUT 40 % means white noise coming from the microphone...
    Disabling PulseAudio is not really an option as Skype doesn't work with anything but PulseAudio. Besides that the problem also occurs with arecord.
    Last edited by volatile void (2014-12-27 14:22:48)

  • Fms4 cpu too high

    in my fms live project
    I am very confused, every few hours, fms server cpu becomes too high .
    If I restart the orignal server, 500 connections, cpu only 25% but after a few hours later to reach 250%
    this is why?

    arnnny wrote:
    Hi, I've got this laptop to repair. What's so strange is that the CPU gets too hot I think. It's AMD A6-4400M.Before I have installed HP CoolSense laptop got to very hih temperatures: 85C, still I'm doubt.
    Product No: B4X90EA#AKS
    These are current  HWINFO stats (after CoolSense install)
    CPU 0: max 70C min 53C
    CP0 Package 102C 118C
    These temperatures are measured during security essentials scan
    My ProBook 4540s with intel i3-3110M
    CPU0 min 42C max 58C
    CPU Package: Min 45C max 61C
    And thes during MRT scan
    Laptop is relatively new. I'm planning to change thermal paste, but I'm currently hesitating to open it.
    How do you mean new? Is it in warranty still? If so don't open it and contact HP support for help on this if not in warranty anymore you can find help online where people can on youtube or online site show you how to dissemble the laptop and replace the thermal paste. It could be the thermal paste is wearing out and need repasting but if in warranty don't open it and contact HP otherwise look online for further instructions on how to dissemble your laptop and reapplying the thermal paste.
    I am a Volunteer to help others on here-not a HP employee.
    Replies aren't online 24/7 because of Time Zone differences.
    Remember in this Day and Age of Computing the Internet is Knowledge at your fingertips if you choose understand it. -2015-

  • IPod Touch play count WAY too high

    My 16GB 2G iPod Touch has a play count which is far too high. It is like 1500 for songs I have added today. Any way to solve this?
    I have tried resetting the play counts, skip counts and restoring my iPod. No luck.

    I'm having the same issue. I've got an iPod Touch 1G, fully updated. I'm seeing tracks that I've literally not played in weeks maybe even MONTHS come up with hundreds, and songs i've played maybe once or twice come up with thousands. I reset all the play counts to try again but it didn't make a difference, next thing i knew, a whole load of new tracks were up there in the thousands.
    It's REALLY annoying, cause I've got a Most Played smart playlist, which doesn't really work in the first place as it doesn't update itself no matter how many times i plug my iPod into the computer, and even if it DID work, it wouldn't be very accurate, and I'd have a load of Janet Jackson interludes clogging up my most played, which gets annoying after a while, no matter how entertaining they are when they're part of the album!
    What can we do?!

  • MSI 280x max temp is too high

    hi,
    I just got 2 second hand MSI 280x from someone. Quickly ran FurMark on these cards (1 after another, not crossfire) and their temperature both pass 95+ celsius degree at 100% fan speed. Both cards in mint condition, only few dust on the heatsink.
    Thinking the heat problem may come from dry thermal compound, I apply some Noctua NT-H1 to one of those cards and its temperature never pass 85 celsius degree. This seems still little too high because this review shows max temp of such card is well under 80C www. tomshardware. com/reviews/radeon-r9-280x-third-party-round-up,3655-4.html
    What could go wrong and How I can make these cards cooler?
    Thanks

    Quote from: Suxipo on 15-November-14, 09:24:14
    I apply some Noctua NT-H1 to one of those cards and its temperature never pass 85 celsius degree.
    This temperature is fine. There is no issue anymore.
    Quote from: Suxipo on 15-November-14, 09:24:14
    This seems still little too high because this review shows max temp of such card is well under 80C www. tomshardware. com/reviews/radeon-r9-280x-third-party-round-up,3655-4.html
    What could go wrong and How I can make these cards cooler?
    Thanks
    You can't compare reviews to your real life experience in a working machine instead of an open system used for short benachmark sessions. Temperature results are individual and as said before card now performs well with new paste.

  • Error message Translational currency is too high when posting GR for a PO

    Hi,
    I am trying to post a GR for a PO,with document currency say in GBP and local currency in EUR,when i tried to post a GR the system gives the message with-"Translational currency is too high" and also the value updated for previous GRs(for a qty 10) is vary high like 37,056,361,610.68     GBP,just i want to know how this value is picked by the system,i know exhange rate table maintained is plays important role,but the value i am getting is too high which is not at all related with rates we maintained in the table TCURR.
    I want to know why system is giving such a high value.     
    further PO quantity is 17,000 and net price is 1 GBP.
    we have posted very sucessfull GR earlier,but now this high value and error in GR  we are facing.
    with regards,

    Hi,
    Good afternoon and greetings,
    Wishing you a Happy New Year 2007
    Please go through the following OSS Note
    Note 191927 - Posting logic: GR for foreign currency PO
    Please reward points if found useful
    Thanking you
    With kindest regards
    Ramesh Padmanabhan

  • When I print business cards, they sometimes print 1/4 too high but not always.

    I have my business cards in a Word document using an Avery template. I have used the same file for years. I never had a problem with my Canon printer but after buying an HP Photosmart D110 I have had nothing but problems. When I print then they print about 1/4 inch too high ruining the cardstock and wasting ink. This doesn't happen all the time. Sometimes I print and they are perfect but when I go back and print another, the problem returns. This is the same card stock I have used for years and when it is inserted in the printer it doesn't matter if it is a single page or a stack of them. I have tried previewing the page before printing and the alignment is correct. I've tried printing to a PDF and then printing the PDF, same problem. I try it on the Canon and no problem. Only reason I bought this in the first place was the cartridges were cheaper and I do a lot of color printing and scanning!  I have just replaced the cartridges and did a head alignment so that is not the problem. I have tried it with regular paper and the problem persists. I'm ready to drop kick this thing and buy another Canon!
    This question was solved.
    View Solution.

    Did you ever find a solution for this problem? I have no problem printing the business cards out on a Canon printer, or a different HP printer I used to have, but the D110 is nothing but a pain in the you know what !  I'm using publisher and the avery 8371 card stock,  I searched solutions for days and did everything possible but still they're not printing correctly!! I'm dissapointed in this printer, every time I have a problem with something it always seems to be an HP product!!!  Very frustrating because I never had to mess with any settings in the other printers I had, I would just put the file in, change the quality and click the print button with no problems. I'm ready to throw this printer out the window Anyway thanks in advance and I hope somebody can help me with this issue !!! 

  • I have a macbook pro OS 10.5.8. I've sync'ed it with an iPad 2. I would like to access the "cloud" but it seems my Leopard isn't sufficient. How high an OS upgrade would i need to use cloud? Most of my current apps wouldn't work with a too high upgrade.

    I have a macbook pro OS leopard 10.5.8. I've synced it with an iPad 2. I cannot access the cloud because my OS is insufficient. Problem is most of my most- used applications would not work with a too-high system upgrade. I can't afford to upgrade all my apps. I need to know: what would be the least-high system upgrade I can install in order to access the cloud on my new iPad 2? 
    MAC O.S. 10.5.8 - LEOPARD
    MacBookPro
    MacBookPro4,1
    Intel Core 2 Duo - 2.5 GHz; speed 800 MHz
    Quark Express 7.3
    Adobe Acrobat 8 Pro
    Adobe Photoshop CS 3
    Adobe Illustrator CS 3
    Adobe InDesign CS 3
    Microsoft Office 2008
    Extensis Suitcase Fusion 12.1.7
    Stuffit 12
    Thanx
    calico6

    Define "access the cloud". I can access my iCloud.com account on my 5 year old iMac at work running OS X 10.4.11 Tiger. I can download and upload Word documents and Pages documents in the iWorks section of my iCloud.com account.
    What do you want to access in "the cloud"?
    Snow Leopard would be your next system upgrade and you should be OK with the CS3 applications, and Office 2008. I cannot confirm that the other applications will work.
    This is quite old, but take a look or Google the other applications to see if they are compatible with SL.
    http://www.macintouch.com/specialreports/snowleopard/slcompat.html

  • IMac Hard Drive expectations, Are mine too high?

    Hey everyone.
    I have a 27" iMac i5. Its around 22 months old now and its being used as a personal PC at home.
    Lately, I have been experiencing HDD related issues, It hangs, load times are poor, OS takes ages to boot (windows and OSX)
    I backed up all my data to external drives and did a clean OS restore to Lion. No help, first boot with the OS was just as bad as a boot full of clutter. Loading Windows on the win partition also sometimes gives me the "cannot find OS boot disk" error which is scary.
    Anyway's doing research its all sure tell-tale signs of a failing HDD and ironically last night on my Win7 partition, I got the windows error message saying my "windows detected a hard disk problem, back up all data and contact your manufacture".
    Now, back on topic. Is this reasonable? a $2000+ computer suffering from a hardware fault like this when the HDD has never had more than 30% of the 1TB used in its life? (everything I keep backed up on externals.)
    I was honestly expecting a few more years out of this, **** even my 5 year old Macbook has never had an issue in its life and its been bagged around more places I can think of in its lifetime. How does a computer that sits on a desk suffer for a hardware failure such as this?
    From day one, I had a faulty power board inside, it caused a loud electronic buzzing noise. I did not get this fixed for aroun 9 months as tbh, it sounded normal but in the last month leading upto the replacement, it got much louder over a few days. This was replaced by Apple and I was sent on my way happy it was fixed. could this have caused something to overload?
    I am a little bit bitter which I am sure you can understand, but was my expectation of this hard drive just too high? or am I in my right to be a little upset by this?
    And before anyone askes, I was OS when my warranty ran out, my Macbook, iPad 3XiPhones and Mac Mini are all covered by their own Apple Care. the only thing that isnt is the iMac.. just my luck!
    Edit: the old link for the power board.
    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/2737002

    Thanks guys.
    Just got off the phone to Applecare.
    they confirmed my drive is faulty. Im just a little upset it died like this. I have never had a drive fail before. Id rather my externals go than the internal.
    Spoke to Apple, they said that he spoke to his Tech Specalist and they would not offer a free replacement. I agree is its 10 months out of warranty, but even the Apple rep I was speaking too said he would not be impressed either if it was his personal computer
    Oh well. Time to look at HDD Upgrade options! Not that I am totally impressed about it.

  • GR for PO in forex resulted in currency conversion rounding difference

    Hi,
    I have created a PO in foreign currency and when I perform a GR in MIGO, it created the following 4 FI postings:
    1) DR Stock - Amount in Forex, Amount in Local Curx
    2) CR GR/IR - Amount in Forex, Amount in Local Curx
    3) DR Rounding Diff  0.00 in Forex, 0.01 in Local Curx
    4) CR Rounding Diff 0.00 in Forex, 0.01 in Local Curx.
    Below are the information for the PO item:
    Quantity = 350
    Unit Price in EUR = 10.39.  ==> Amount in forex = 350 * 10.39 = 3,636.50
    Conversion rate = 10.61 ==> Amount in local curx = 350 * 10.39 * 10.61 = 38,583.265 rounded to 28,583.27.
    Line 1 & line 2 ==> Rounded amount = 28,583.27.
    Question: Why is the additional lines (3) & (4) being generated ?
    When I did the MIGO posting, the system ask for the additonal account keys PRD and KDM in OBYC which I have supplied with "Rounding Diff" Account.
    We have tried with different quantities and this problem so far only happens when the quantiy = 350.  (Incidently, the rounding diffence for quantity 350 is exactly 0.005 and the same rounding difference of 0.005 is also applies to quantity 1050, 1750, 2450 etc at every 700 units increment; BUT the 0.01 rounding difference only happeded for quantity 350. Very strange ??)
    Additional Info:
    No special rounding rules is configured in the system.
    Please advice. 
    Thanks and regards,
    Hu Ghee.

    Hi Pankaj,
    Actually, your suggestion worked.  It was jus that when I went to the OMRW screen earlier (even before I posted this message), I saw that the setting was "Blank" and thought that it meant "Not activated" whereas what I need to do was to set it to "No" for no exchange difference.
    TQVM.
    Rgds,
    Hu Ghee

Maybe you are looking for