Routing Deletion
Hi Team,
In CA02, i have set the "Deletion flag" for the routing.
After setting the deletion flag, in PLKO table DELKZ field is updated but the field LOEKZ is not updated. When the PLKO-LOEKZ field will be updated?
What is the difference between these two fields?
Is the PLKO-LOEKZ field will be automatically updated by the system and the user can not manually set this field?
Your guidance required
psk
Even if you delete online through Routing Overview (by click the trash can button) or by activating deletion flag system won't delete it from the database (meaning tables) it will delete it only when you run transaction code CA98 or CA99.
CA98 deletes without archiving meaning you won't have backup on tape drive or something.
CA99 deletes with archiving meaning if you want the data at a later time after a few years you can have it.
When you delete it from routing overview you can still get the data from table, it's just business transactions (CA03, CA02) sees it has non-existent. Just in case you want to see what the data was for the deleted routing.
Let me explain you a little bit about CA98 program.
1. Using that program you can delete any kind of routing, by any kind I mean, completely active, deletion flag activated, deletion indicator activated from the database tables. When you run this program data will completely and permanently disappear from database tables for that particular routing (PLKO, PLPO and all related tables).
2. You can use different combinations of selection options on the screen to delete the desired routings, but when you check Deletion flag from the selection options it will only select the routings with deletion flag active and ignore the active routings. Meaning DELKZ = X only
3. When you select the radio button Objects deleted online it will delete only the ones which have been deleted from routing overview meaning the routings with LOEKZ = X
4. When select the radio button complete task list it's not gonna check if LOEKZ = X
So let me give you an analogy, this is like deleting files from your windows operating system, when you delete a file, it won't immediately delete it from hard drive it will first send it to recycle bin (just in case you change your mind and want to restore it)
Edited by: Jeevan Sagar on Feb 14, 2012 6:15 PM
Similar Messages
-
Hello,
I have a Cisco 2911 with ios (C2900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.1(4)M1
I have set up a Dynamic cryto map to wich I have set reverse rute injection. But I have a weird issue.
First time a tunnel is stablished the reverse route is injected properly. When the lifetime of the fisrt SA negotiated is reaching it's end a new SA is stablished (I can see two spi) and now the weird thing, When the first SA reaches it's end of life, it's deleted but it also deletes de route injected, so there will be no route to the destination until the second SA is reaching it's lifetime, then a new SA is stablished that injects the route but again the route only lasts until the previous SA is deleted wich again deletes the route.
Is this a known caveat or am I doing something wrong?
Thank you.Difficult to say without looking at crypto logs and configs. But you might be hitting this defect
CSCtr87413 (which is related to CSCtz74471)
CSCtz74471
ipsec profile : RRI routes get deleted after IPSec SA lifetime expiry
Symptom: Routes injected via RRI (based on IPSec crypto ACL) get deleted after corresponding IPSec SA gets timed out. Conditions: IPSec SA deletion due to timeout . Workaround: Enabling DPD and Invalid-SPI-recovery would recover the routes once the traffic starts again, but this does not always work.
This is fixed in 15.1(4)M3.
You can view more details here:
http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCtr87413 -
Planner Order routing deletion
Hi,
In a Production Order initially the number of routing operations are 6, now the requirement is to change the Routing from 6 to 3. We can do it in the Production order change or after release, but can we do it in the planned order stage.
Regards
DhananjayHi,
- First make the required changes in routing itself.
- Then Check in your existing plan orders.You will find updates routing data in plan orders also.
If operation are reduced then it will update automatically but if you have incrise the operations then you have to rerun the MRP using planning mode 03 (delete and recreate)
Regards,
Dhaval -
Route add/delete broke my networking
I have run into a networking problem on my cluster, and I cannot figure out what changed.
I had a cluster configured and working. Its access network is 192.168.10.0/24. I have other networks, including a node management network on 10.29.130.0/24. The access network is private to my lab; it's here I have my AD defined.
The management network is a 'lab' network that has a gateway available so we can access the lab from our corporate network with no issues. In other words, the access network is only routed within my private lab, but the management network can be routed
to corporate access.
But, as you know, Windows simply doesn't like creating two different networks with default gateways. So before building the cluster, I removed the gateway from the management network, ensuring there was only a single gateway configured on each host.
Ran the validation and it came through fine (typical network warnings about non-routed networks not able to reach other networks, but that is expected and presents no problems). Built the cluster.
I wanted to try to create an environment that would allow me to access the physical hosts through the management network, so I tried issuing a route add command specific to the management network.
route add 10.29.130.0 mask 255.255.255.0 10.29.130.1 if 3
It didn't work as expected (I am by no means a networking expert, but I figured I would try it.) Since it didn't work, I deleted it.
route delete 10.29.130.0 mask 255.255.255.0 10.29.130.1 if 3
Came back and ran another validation wizard on the cluster and now the validation fails with the following error (to each of the other nodes in the cluster):
Network interfaces FT4-Infra01.VSPEX.COM - Mgmt and FT4-Infra03.VSPEX.COM - Mgmt are on the same cluster network, yet address 10.29.130.37 is not reachable from 10.29.130.35 using UDP on port 3343.
I check my firewall, and those ports are open on all node for all firewall profiles. From FT4-Infra01 (the machine I was messing with), I can ping the other nodes of the cluster. From the other nodes in the cluster, I cannot ping FT4-Infra01.
Yes, I know ping is a different rule, but I always go back to basics. And the fact that it is not responding to pings after playing with the route is strange.
Does anybody have any ideas about what playing with the route command could have changed? I am assuming that is the cause because everything worked fine before issuing the command and now these errors are there. No other changes were made to
the cluster or the nodes.
.:|:.:|:. timHi Tim,
I suggest referring to the following links:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/aevalshah/archive/2012/05/15/windows-server-2008-r2-failover-clustering-best-practice-guide.aspx
http://blogs.technet.com/b/meamcs/archive/2013/11/09/microsoft-windows-multi-site-failover-cluster-best-practices.aspx
Best Regards,
Vincent Wu
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread. -
Windows Server 2012 R2 Routing problem
Hello everybody
I have the following problem:
Server with two NICS, one (IP 172.30.8.X) it's configure with a default gateway (172.30.8.1), the other one (IP 172.30.32.X) doesn't have a default gateway and has a static route to reach another network (172.15.28.X)
Everything was worning fine, no reboots, no updates installed; suddenly the specified route for the second NIC is not working. When we try to reach the 172.15.28.X network, it goes thorugh the default gateway. Please your help.
We tried deleting the route and re-add it again, but doesn't work; also verified the TCP/IP configuration on all NICs everything it's ok.
Here's an output of the configured routes on the server:
C:\Windows\system32>route print
===========================================================================
Interface List
12...9c b6 54 88 49 a8 ......HP FlexFabric 10Gb 2-port 534FLB Adapter #54
13...9c b6 54 88 49 ac ......HP FlexFabric 10Gb 2-port 534FLB Adapter #55
15...02 78 b2 0e 8f c0 ......Microsoft Failover Cluster Virtual Adapter
1...........................Software Loopback Interface 1
14...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 Microsoft ISATAP Adapter #2
16...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 Microsoft ISATAP Adapter
17...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 Microsoft ISATAP Adapter #3
===========================================================================
IPv4 Route Table
===========================================================================
Active Routes:
Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.30.8.1 172.30.8.107 266
127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
127.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
169.254.0.0 255.255.0.0 On-link 169.254.4.217 261
169.254.4.217 255.255.255.255 On-link 169.254.4.217 261
169.254.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 169.254.4.217 261
172.15.28.0 255.255.254.0 172.30.32.1 172.30.8.107 11
172.30.8.0 255.255.254.0 On-link 172.30.8.107 266
172.30.8.107 255.255.255.255 On-link 172.30.8.107 266
172.30.9.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 172.30.8.107 266
172.30.32.0 255.255.254.0 On-link 172.30.32.20 266
172.30.32.20 255.255.255.255 On-link 172.30.32.20 266
172.30.33.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 172.30.32.20 266
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 169.254.4.217 261
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 172.30.8.107 266
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 172.30.32.20 266
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 169.254.4.217 261
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 172.30.8.107 266
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 172.30.32.20 266
===========================================================================
Persistent Routes:
Network Address Netmask Gateway Address Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.30.8.1 Default
172.15.28.0 255.255.254.0 172.30.32.1 1
===========================================================================
Below is the output of a tracert:
C:\Windows\system32>tracert 172.15.28.20
Tracing route to 172.15.28.20 over a maximum of 30 hops
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 172.30.8.1
2 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 172.16.80.1
3 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 10.11.17.193
Any idea is welcome, thanks in advance.
Regards. Cristian V.Hello Eve
Sorry for the delay, we opened a PSS case.
So far, the problems seems to be a misconfiguration on one of the devices.
This is the last output, as soon as we identify the issue and the problem, I'll let you know:
On server UIOMATRP-EXMB01 the route was added succesfully:
route add 172.30.32.0 mask 255.255.255.0 172.15.28.1
C:\Windows\system32>route add 172.30.32.0 mask 255.255.255.0 172.15.28.1
OK!
C:\Windows\system32>tracert 172.30.32.21
Tracing route to 172.30.32.21 over a maximum of 30 hops
1 5 ms 2 ms 2 ms 172.15.28.1
2 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 10.6.1.3
3 1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 10.5.1.3
4 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 10.21.17.65
5 3 ms 5 ms 9 ms 10.201.21.22
6 9 ms 9 ms 8 ms 10.201.111.97
7 9 ms 19 ms 8 ms 10.11.17.193
8 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms 172.16.80.3
9 * * * Request timed out.
10 * * * Request timed out.
11 * ^C
C:\Windows\system32>route delete 172.30.32.0
OK!
C:\Windows\system32>tracert 172.30.32.21
Tracing route to 172.30.32.21 over a maximum of 30 hops
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 172.15.4.1
2 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms ^C
route add 172.30.32.0 mask 255.255.255.0 172.15.28.1 -p
OK!
C:\Windows\system32>tracert 172.30.32.21
Tracing route to 172.30.32.21 over a maximum of 30 hops
1 4 ms 2 ms 1 ms 172.15.28.1
2 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 10.6.1.3
3 1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 10.5.1.3
4 1 ms 1 ms <1 ms 10.21.17.65
5 5 ms 4 ms 9 ms 10.201.21.22
6 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms 10.116.41.197
7 9 ms 207 ms 9 ms 10.116.41.198
8 9 ms 8 ms 9 ms 10.11.17.194
9 9 ms * 10 ms 172.16.80.3
10 * * * Request timed out.
11 *
===========================================================================
Interface List
17...9c b6 54 93 fd d8 ......HP FlexFabric 10Gb 2-port 534FLB Adapter #76
16...9c b6 54 93 fd dc ......HP FlexFabric 10Gb 2-port 534FLB Adapter #77
15...02 fa 66 6d 81 b1 ......Microsoft Failover Cluster Virtual Adapter
1...........................Software Loopback Interface 1
12...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 Microsoft ISATAP Adapter
13...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 Microsoft ISATAP Adapter #2
14...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 Microsoft 6to4 Adapter
18...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 Microsoft ISATAP Adapter #3
===========================================================================
IPv4 Route Table
===========================================================================
Active Routes:
Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.15.4.1 172.15.5.38 266
127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
127.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
169.254.0.0 255.255.0.0 On-link 169.254.1.233 261
169.254.1.233 255.255.255.255 On-link 169.254.1.233 261
169.254.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 169.254.1.233 261
172.15.4.0 255.255.254.0 On-link 172.15.5.38 266
172.15.5.38 255.255.255.255 On-link 172.15.5.38 266
172.15.5.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 172.15.5.38 266
172.15.28.0 255.255.254.0 On-link 172.15.28.20 266
172.15.28.20 255.255.255.255 On-link 172.15.28.20 266
172.15.29.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 172.15.28.20 266
172.30.32.0 255.255.255.0 172.15.28.1 172.15.28.20 11
---------------------------à route successfully applied
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 169.254.1.233 261
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 172.15.28.20 266
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 172.15.5.38 266
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 169.254.1.233 261
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 172.15.28.20 266
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 172.15.5.38 266
===========================================================================
Persistent Routes:
Network Address Netmask Gateway Address Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.15.4.1 Default
172.30.32.0 255.255.255.0 172.15.28.1 1
===========================================================================
IPv6 Route Table
===========================================================================
Active Routes:
If Metric Network Destination Gateway
1 306 ::1/128 On-link
14 1010 2002::/16 On-link
14 266 2002:ac0f:526::ac0f:526/128
On-link
14 266 2002:ac0f:1c14::ac0f:1c14/128
On-link
15 261 fe80::/64 On-link
15 261 fe80::7439:c10d:c470:c569/128
On-link
1 306 ff00::/8 On-link
15 261 ff00::/8 On-link
===========================================================================
Persistent Routes:
None
--- ARP
Interface: 169.254.1.233 --- 0xf
Internet Address Physical Address Type
169.254.255.255 ff-ff-ff-ff-ff-ff static
224.0.0.22 01-00-5e-00-00-16 static
224.0.0.252 01-00-5e-00-00-fc static
Interface: 172.15.5.38 --- 0x10
Internet Address Physical Address Type
172.15.4.1 00-08-e3-ff-fd-90 dynamic ---------------à
default gateway
172.15.4.41 00-50-56-88-50-71 dynamic
172.15.4.42 ac-16-2d-78-0c-5c dynamic
172.15.4.52 00-08-02-b0-49-17 dynamic
172.15.4.55 00-50-56-bd-72-f0 dynamic
172.15.4.56 00-50-56-ab-00-16 dynamic
172.15.5.33 00-50-56-88-11-4a dynamic
172.15.5.34 00-50-56-88-6d-14 dynamic
172.15.5.35 fc-15-b4-1c-05-20 dynamic
172.15.5.36 fc-15-b4-1c-34-a4 dynamic
172.15.5.39 f0-92-1c-02-c8-5c dynamic
172.15.5.41 fc-15-b4-1c-69-64 dynamic
172.15.5.255 ff-ff-ff-ff-ff-ff static
224.0.0.22 01-00-5e-00-00-16 static
224.0.0.252 01-00-5e-00-00-fc static
225.0.0.1 01-00-5e-00-00-01 static
Interface: 172.15.28.20 --- 0x11
Internet Address Physical Address Type
172.15.28.1 00-08-e3-ff-fd-90 dynamic
172.15.28.21 f0-92-1c-02-c8-58 dynamic
224.0.0.22 01-00-5e-00-00-16 static
224.0.0.252 01-00-5e-00-00-fc static
225.0.0.1 01-00-5e-00-00-01 static
Before, there was an error on routes applied on server UIOMATRP-EXMB01:
IPv4 Route Table
===========================================================================
Active Routes:
Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.15.4.1 172.15.5.38 266
127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
127.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
169.254.0.0 255.255.0.0 On-link 169.254.1.11 261
169.254.1.11 255.255.255.255 On-link 169.254.1.11 261
169.254.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 169.254.1.11 261
172.15.4.0 255.255.254.0 On-link 172.15.5.38 266
172.15.5.38 255.255.255.255 On-link 172.15.5.38 266
172.15.5.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 172.15.5.38 266
172.15.28.0 255.255.254.0 On-link 172.15.28.20 266
172.15.28.20 255.255.255.255 On-link 172.15.28.20 266
172.15.29.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 172.15.28.20 266
172.30.32.0 255.255.254.0 172.15.28.1 172.15.5.38 11 -------------------Error
172.30.32.0 255.255.254.0 172.15.28.1 172.15.28.20 11
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 169.254.1.11 261
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 172.15.28.20 266
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 172.15.5.38 266
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 169.254.1.11 261
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 172.15.28.20 266
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 172.15.5.38 266
EOOn the second server
GYESITEA-EXMB02, the network is not reachable:
C:\Windows\system32>route add 172.15.28.20 mask 255.255.255.255 172.30.32.1 if 13 -----à the
route was forced with the nic index 13 to the IP address 172.15.28.20
OK!
C:\Windows\system32>route print
===========================================================================
interface List
13...9c b6 54 93 fd 7c ......HP FlexFabric 10Gb 2-port 534FLB Adapter #59
12...9c b6 54 93 fd 78 ......HP FlexFabric 10Gb 2-port 534FLB Adapter #58
16...02 ce fe 26 83 9f ......Microsoft Failover Cluster Virtual Adapter
1...........................Software Loopback Interface 1
14...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 Microsoft ISATAP Adapter
15...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 Microsoft ISATAP Adapter #2
17...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 Microsoft ISATAP Adapter #3
===========================================================================
IPv4 Route Table
===========================================================================
Active Routes:
Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.30.8.1 172.30.8.108 266
127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
127.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
169.254.0.0 255.255.0.0 On-link 169.254.3.180 261
169.254.3.180 255.255.255.255 On-link 169.254.3.180 261
169.254.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 169.254.3.180 261
172.15.28.20 255.255.255.255 172.30.32.1 172.30.32.21 11 --------------route forced and applied
172.30.8.0 255.255.254.0 On-link 172.30.8.108 266
172.30.8.108 255.255.255.255 On-link 172.30.8.108 266
172.30.9.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 172.30.8.108 266
172.30.32.0 255.255.254.0 On-link 172.30.32.21 266
172.30.32.21 255.255.255.255 On-link 172.30.32.21 266
172.30.33.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 172.30.32.21 266
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 127.0.0.1
306
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 169.254.3.180 261
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 172.30.8.108 266
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 172.30.32.21 266
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 169.254.3.180 261
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 172.30.8.108 266
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 172.30.32.21 266
===========================================================================
C:\Windows\system32>tracert 172.15.28.20
Tracing route to 172.15.28.20 over a maximum of 30 hops
1 General failure.
Trace complete.
C:\Windows\system32>tracert 172.15.28.20
Tracing route to 172.15.28.20 over a maximum of 30 hops
1 GYESITEA-EXMB02.xxxxxxxxxx [172.30.32.21] reports: Destination host
unreachable.
Trace complete.
Regards. Cristian V. -
How to delete an object from a change master?
I have a situation where a PDM has copied a route (task list) that was tied to a change master and brought it over by mistake, the route was also copied to the wrong group number and counter. What I want to do is have the route deleted and recreated with it's own group number and counter 1, however because it is linked to a change master it keeps pulling in that same group number. Any idea how to correct this or remove the material from the change master, we've tried to delete the object but get the message that not all objects were deleted and it is still there.
Thanks in advance.HI sathish,
1. If the old request is release,
then we cannot do anything.
(There is no point in changing that old request)
(bcos its already released)
2. what can be done is that
u save once again the objects,
and it will once again ask for new request.
3. this time save it in new request
regards,
amit m. -
MBP Self Assigning IP Address on one router only
This seems to be a common problem and seems to have been occuring for quite some time now. I am very disappointed that Apple have not come up with a simple fix for it.
Here is my version of events: I recently upgraded to OS X Mavericks and ever since I did that my MBP will not connect to one of the routers in my office - all my other devices and all the other MBPs manage fine. I have tried the following:
- Resetting the router
- Deleting the network from Keychain Access
- Resetting the firewall
- Restarting / rebooting my MBP
- and varying combinations of the above
I fail to believe that a permanent fix has been discovered, sometimes one of the above 'fixes' will work temporarily, other times not at all. Sometimes I am able to connect to the wifi for a full day, other times for 5 minutes. Nothing should be this sporadic.
I am also disappointed that I have to trawl through forums to find answers.
Stop making me sad Apple.If your computer connects fine to other networks/routers then it would seem logical that there is a router issue with the router that can not be connected to. Why would you assume it is an Apple problem? Make sure the router has its most current firmware and that all settings are correct. Do any other devices have issues connecting to the suspect router?
-
I have a server with Intel 82576 Gigabit Dual Port Nics. I have configured them to use iSCSI boot the primary looks to 10.0.0.1/24 and the secondary looks to 10.0.1.1/24. The target is configured correctly. Everything boots as expected.
I have added the MPIO feature and configured MPIO for the iscsi initiator as per: http://blogs.technet.com/b/migreene/archive/2009/08/29/3277914.aspx.
My issue is that the iSCSI networks show up in the routing table like so:
I did not configure a default route in the Intel setup utility:
I tried to explicitly remove the 0.0.0.0 entry and leave blank, with no change. As you can see with the above routing table traffic attempts to travel over these routes:
C:\Users\Administrator>ping google.com
Pinging google.com [209.85.145.99] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 10.0.0.201: Destination host unreachable.
Reply from 10.0.1.201: Destination host unreachable.
Reply from 209.85.145.99: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.145.99: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=51
Ping statistics for 209.85.145.99:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
A ping to the outside world first attempts on 10.0.0.x/24 network, then on 10.0.1.x/24 network and then finally on the network the traffic should go over. I don't want my iSCSI traffic to ever show up with a default route. How do I get rid of it?
route delete 0.0.0.0 mask 0.0.0.0 "on-link" results in: The route deletion failed: The parameter is incorrect.
route delete 0.0.0.0 mask 0.0.0.0 on-link results in: The route deletion failed: The parameter is incorrect.
route delete 0.0.0.0 deletes all default routes, then I have to add back in the "valid default route" of 192.168.100.6.
I would like to not have to do a route delete though.So I've sort of given up on fixing the gateway assignment in the route for iSCSI boot. I configured a DHCP server to give out the information required by iSCSI boot and configured the network cards to use DHCP for their configuration. I insured
that my DHCP server gave out no default gateway entry. However, I still got the undesired routes in the routing table. This makes me assume that there isn't a "fix" for it, only the workaround.
Here is the script I run on each iSCSI Boot initiator (you would obviously change the ip number to suit your environment):
@Echo off
Rem fixes iscsi route problem as shown below:
Rem IPv4 Route Table
REM ===========================================================================
REM Active Routes:
REM Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric
REM 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 On-link 10.0.0.200 10255
REM 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 On-link 10.0.1.200 266
REM 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.100.6 192.168.100.98 266
REM The top 2 lines are on the iscsi interface and traffic tries to go out it
REM We need to delete the routes, so we'll just delete all gateway routes and
REM add back in the one we care about.
route delete 0.0.0.0 >c:\iscsibootroutefix.log
route -p add 0.0.0.0 mask 0.0.0.0 192.168.100.6 >>c:\iscsibootroutefix.log
After running it I get:
IPv4 Route Table
===========================================================================
Active Routes:
Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.100.6 192.168.100.98 11
10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 On-link 10.0.0.200 10255
10.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.0.0.200 10255
10.0.0.200 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.0.0.200 10255
Then I added a task in “task scheduler” of "administrative tools" that ran as the user “system” “when the computer starts” that runs this script. -
I am using the Advanced Routing section.
When I initially enter the IP addresses and click Save Settings the assignments work properly.
When I power down my router and repower it, the assignments no longer work. I must SAVE SETTINGS each time after repowering the router for the assignments to take effect.
Is there a solution?
ThanksRouter: Wrt54G V7 WRT54GV7
I'm loosing my static routing once a day. That is, the route shows in the Entry list, but not when I click the "Show Routing table" button, and the particular route is not working.
- I then have to register the route again manually.
- Every time I register a route, it occupies a position in Entry List (1-20), which soon will be full.
- I can not delete entries from the list, once that route is lost.
- Also, when I click "Save Settings" with one of the lost routes selected in "Select set number:" then I'm getting the message "Failed to delete entries"
Apart from this the box is working, but why could they not stick to Linux ???!?!?
I think this is a BUG, and should be fixed with a firmware update. I'm using: Firmware Version: v7.00.4.
I'm having the same problem on 2 equal boxes.
Anyone else with this problem?
Any solution?
Keywords: "Advanced Routing", "Static Routing", "Delete this Entry", "Show Routing table", "Failed to delete entries" -
How to save routing entries permanently after route add
Hi guys,
I have added routing entries through route add command. I know i can add routing entries permanently thru -p option in route add command but didin't use that option. How to save those routing entries now?
Thanks...The filename you are looking for is /etc/inet/static_routes which is available only on Solaris 10 update 3 or later:
root_sol10u3# route -p add -net 192.168.138.0/24 192.168.136.1
root_sol10u3# cat /etc/inet/static_routes
# File generated by route(1M) - do not edit.
-net 192.168.128.0/22 192.168.136.1
-net 192.168.138.0/24 192.168.136.1
-net 172.31.68.0/24 192.168.149.253
-net 172.31.69.0/24 192.168.149.253
root_sol10u3#For Solaris 10 update 2 or earlier, persistent static routes are not implemented. Additionally, the old RC script method suggested above also will not work for Solaris 10 given the host isn't always guaranteed to reach the "multiuser" milestone and subsequently run the legacy /etc/rc*/S* scripts (say if a filesystem fails to mount). For those releases, you should create a new manifest file as follows:
root_sol10u2# cat /var/svc/manifest/network/RKstatic-routes.xml
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE service_bundle SYSTEM "/usr/share/lib/xml/dtd/service_bundle.dtd.1">
<!--
Static Route SMF Manefest
To be replaced by official Sun mechanism in next solaris release
-->
<service_bundle type='manifest' name='RKstatic-routes'>
<service
name='network/RKstatic-routes'
type='service'
version='1'>
<create_default_instance enabled='true' />
<single_instance/>
<dependency name='network'
grouping='require_any'
restart_on='error'
type='service'>
<service_fmri value='svc:/network/service' />
</dependency>
<exec_method
type='method'
name='start'
exec='/lib/svc/method/RKstatic-routes start'
timeout_seconds='60' />
<exec_method
type='method'
name='stop'
exec='/lib/svc/method/RKstatic-routes stop'
timeout_seconds='60' />
<property_group name='startd' type='framework'>
<propval name='duration' type='astring' value='transient' />
</property_group>
<stability value='Unstable' />
</service>
</service_bundle>
root_sol10u2#Then create the method script:
root_sol10u2# cat /lib/svc/method/RKstatic-routes
#!/bin/sh
# RKstatic-routes
# To be called by the network/RKstatic-route SMF service
ACTION=${ACTION:-add}
setup_routes () {
#Route to networks.
/usr/sbin/route $ACTION net 172.1.0.0 -netmask 255.255.0.0 10.1.0.0
/usr/sbin/route $ACTION net 172.2.0.0 -netmask 255.255.0.0 10.2.0.0
case "$1" in
start)
echo "${ACTION}ing static routes"
setup_routes
stop)
ACTION=delete
echo "${ACTION}ing static routes"
setup_routes
echo "Usage: $0 {start|stop}"
exit 1
esac
root_sol10u2#Then, import and enable/start the service:
root_sol10u2# svccfg -v import /var/svc/manifest/network/RKstatic-routes.xml
root_sol10u2# svcadm enable network/RKstatic-routes
root_sol10u2# To stop:
root_sol10u2# svcadm disable network/RKstatic-routes
root_sol10u2# For posterity, here is a pre-Solaris 10 version:
root_sol9# cat /etc/init.d/staticRoutes.sh
#!/bin/sh
case "$1" in
start)
test -f /etc/routes.conf || exit 0
while read type route gateway
do
/usr/sbin/route add $type $route $gateway
done < /etc/routes.conf
stop)
test -f /etc/routes.conf || exit 0
while read type route gateway
do
/usr/sbin/route delete $type $route $gateway
done < /etc/routes.conf
echo "Usage: /etc/init.d/routes { start | stop }"
esac
root_sol9# cat /etc/routes.conf
172.1.2.0/24 172.1.2.4
172.1.3.0/24 172.1.3.4
root_sol9# ln -s /etc/rc2.d/S70staticRoutes /etc/init.d/staticRoutes.sh
root_sol9#Best Regards,
Bryan Wood -
Routes, gateways, and networks -- Help Please
Hi Linux gurus:
I have a problem that I know you will help me resolve...
I have two network cards in my Linux box.
1. public network:
10/100
192.168.1.102
default gw: 192.168.1.1
netmask: 255.255.255.0
I want this one routed to my router for internet/public use
2. private network 1000mpbs
192.168.2.181
default gw: none
netmask: 255.255.255.0
I don't want this one routed at all. It is used for backups, moving files, etc and is called by individual servers using /etc/hosts.
Now problem is that I can't get out and/or in to the box. It appears as though the default gateway on this system is 192.168.2.254. I set up the network via the gui and it appeared to be working, but alas it is not. It looks like things are only talking via the 192.168.2.X network, and that is not what I want...and from the outside world, nothing at all is talking to it.
Below is my ifconfig -a and my netstat -rn
Please help!
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:18:F3:E8:29:2A
BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
Interrupt:193 Base address:0x8000
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:90:27:AC:7C:4D
inet addr:192.168.1.102 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:5339 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:1891 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:588251 (574.4 KiB) TX bytes:530473 (518.0 KiB)
eth2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0F:B5:43:16:D0
inet addr:192.168.2.181 Bcast:192.168.2.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:300106 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:617831 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:28009736 (26.7 MiB) TX bytes:585354764 (558.2 MiB)
Interrupt:217 Base address:0xc000
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:816528 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:816528 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:102034952 (97.3 MiB) TX bytes:102034952 (97.3 MiB)
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth2
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth2
0.0.0.0 192.168.2.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth2Ok...I did the following:
route add default gw 192.168.1.1 eth1
route delete default gw 192.168.2.254 eth2
I am able to get out to the outside world and it seems to work fine, but just curious:
1. How do I keep this from reverting again? (I could put this in my own script, but would rather not hack it, but do it right)
2. Are my routing tables below correct now (it works I understand, but want to ensure it is done correctly).
3. What is this route for (in the below table) and is it needed?
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth2
4. Since i'm relying on /etc/hosts files for the systems on the 192.168.2.X interface should there even be a route for this subnet?
updated routing table:
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth2
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth2
0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1 -
Dear All,
I've created a work center and didn't put in the Activity Types in the costing tab. Then I created a routing and used this work center in (Activity Types field was empty). Afterwards, I linked the activity types in the work centers once I had them created from the Finance and went to CR02 to update the missing activity types in the operation.
When I run costing or when I create a production order, it !!!!doesn't!!!! see the activity costs. The only way that it sees it is when I go to the routing, delete the entire line! and create it again (it will automatically read the activity type from the work center now).
How can I fix this bug? is there anything I can do about this?Dear All,
You have misunderstood me. I know that the routing won't read the new Activity Type in the Work Center after I update the Work Center. This is not my problem!
My problem is that when I created the routing the Work Center had no Activity Types therefore the routing operation had no activity types, later on I've added the activity types from the routing operation details. The system doesn't feel the change I've made in the routing! UNLESS I delete the entire operation and create it again (it will read direct from the WC).
HOWEVER!!!! if I had initially created the routing operation and it reads from the WC and then I change the routing operation's Activity Type, it works and the system reads the change!
Why is it when the operation is initially created with no AT, they system will no feel any changes.
This IS a bug, I traced it inside the tables. -
Network problem (default route?)
Hello, I just installed Solaris 10. After installation my NIC died so I replaced it by a new one. At that point everything went wrong.
The configuration of my internal network is:
router: 192.168.2.1
nameserver: 192.168.2.1
my pc (hurricane): 192.168.2.34
I followed this guid: http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/806-0916/6ja853995?a=view
But for some reason it doesn't work.
I have the following configuration:
ifconfig -aelxl1: <---------->
inet 192.168.2.34 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.2.255
cat defaultrouter192.168.2.1
cat hosts127.0.0.1 localhost hurricane hurricane.intern
192.168.2.34 localhost hurricane hurricane.intern
192.168.2.1 router
cat nodename.elxl1hurricane
cat hostname.elxl1hurricane
cat defaultdomainintern
netstat -rv192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 hurricane device elxl1
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 localhost lo0
default 0.0.0.0 router
localhost 255.255.255.255 localhost lo0
telnet router 80Trying 192.168.2.1...
traceroute router1 * *I think the default gateway is not set up properly. But I have no idea why and how to fix it. Doe anyone have a clue or suggestion what might goes wrong here?
Sorry for my bad english, it's not my native language.initiate a commnad using "route"
route change default x.x.x.x
if that don't work try
route delete default 0.0.0.0
then...
route add default x.x.x.x
also, "route" command is one time thing. unless you add/create a startup script in /etc/rc2.d/S69inet, you have to run this command all the time you boot the system.
route add default x.x.x.x
man the route command. -
I noticed my VPN connections overrides the default route set by my WiFi connection. With an active VPN I can browse my office network but not the WWW.
When I type in terminal …
sudo route delete default
sudo route add -net default 192.168.2.1
sudo route add -net 192.168.178.0 192.168.178.201
… I can access (via VPN) my office network and can still browse in the WWW.
Is there any way I can prevent to override the default route when establishing a VPN connection (IPSec Cisco via Network > Add VPN)?
Maybe I can create an AppleScript or something like that?
192.168.2.1 = local network (home)
192.168.178.1 = remote network (office)
192.168.178.201 = remote virtual client IPWhy would you even come here asking for help with a Friztbox anyway? You should have contact the maker of the router or your network admins for info on how to enable split tunneling.
I wasn't asking for help about my Fritzbox. I didn't know where to start and thought Apple's forums maybe a good starting point. You told me "Nothing you can do about it.". I found a solution I can do it without touching the Fritzbox config. I tought a forum is to help others not to tell them "there's no way" or go and ask the maker.
Anyway, next time I will not consider to ask here. Sorry for bothering you. -
Using Applescript to connect to VPN and add routes
I posted this in the wrong place last night, but actually managed to get an answer to it. Here is the original post:
I need to be able to set some routes upon opening a particular VPN connection so I did some searching and found a really simple Applescript that does the job. Problem is it tries to set the routes before the VPN actually connects so the routes don't go in.
I added in a 10 second delay which does the trick, but I'm thinking there has to be a way to do this that waits until the VPN actually connects before continuing - so if it takes 5 seconds or 10 or whatever, it waits.
The other thing I'm doing that I think is bad is I'm sending a route delete command before sending the add command. Why? Because if I don't and for some reason the route is partially in the table, it doesn't give an error and ends up not routing. Again, probably a better way to do this.
Here is my current script:
-- Connect Work VPN
tell application "System Events"
tell current location of network preferences
set VPNservice to service "Work" -- name of the VPN service
if exists VPNservice then connect VPNservice
end tell
end tell
delay 10
set gateway to "x.x.x.x" -- omitted here for security
do shell script "route delete 192.168.25.0/24 " & gateway with administrator privileges
do shell script "route delete 192.168.20.0/24 " & gateway with administrator privileges
do shell script "route add 192.168.25.0/24 " & gateway with administrator privileges
do shell script "route add 192.168.20.0/24 " & gateway with administrator privileges
From the response I received, I modified the script to this:
tell application "System Events"
tell current location of network preferences
set VPNservice to service "Work" -- name of the VPN service
if exists VPNservice then connect VPNservice
repeat until (connected of current configuration of VPNservice)
delay 1
end repeat
end tell
end tell
set gateway to "x.x.x.x" -- omitted here for security
do shell script "route delete 192.168.25.0/24 " & gateway with administrator privileges
do shell script "route delete 192.168.20.0/24 " & gateway with administrator privileges
do shell script "route add 192.168.25.0/24 " & gateway with administrator privileges
do shell script "route add 192.168.20.0/24 " & gateway with administrator privileges
That seems to work perfectly, but I'm still wondering if there is a better way of handling the routes. Suggestions?
Thanks.I realize the VPN gateway should add the routes, but it's not and they don't seem to want it to. No idea why.
As for deleting/adding the routes, yes it does seem wrong to do this or pointless. The reason I'm doing this is for what I found in my testing of the script which was if the script hung for some reason and the route did not fully go into the table, I would be unable to add it with the script when I ran it again.
I'm probably not explaining it that well, but when I couldn't route after trying to run my script initially, I tried manually running the add route command and I'd get an error. Thus, I deleted/added the route and than it worked again.
As pointless as it seems it works every time. I'm sure there's a better/cleaner/smarter way of doing this, but I don't know enough about Applescript to do any more. At this point I can probably remove the delete command, though, since it should run properly each time.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Share iCal among all the users on one iMac
I guess this is impossible, but I'll ask anyway. My family shares one iMac in the family room. We all have our own login profiles and we want to have a shared calender so we can see when and when we all have plans... Is this too much to ask for from
-
Service entry sheet - GR quantity is more than confirmed quantity
We have a service based PO with Acct assignment F and Item category D. We have ticked Goods receipt in delievery tab. We have ticked 1) invoivce receipt and 2) GR-based IV. ( S-based IV is not ticked) There is no purchase order history. While making
-
Sustitution of System.out.println in Graphical mode
Dear Sirs: I am changing my applications to graphical mode. I would like to know what is the command that substitutes System.out.println in graphical mode. Thanks in advance
-
Topology builder encountered an issue and cannot publish the topology.
Hi all, Initially I have created a topology and with central management store in the domain controller. DC\rtc Then i deleted the existing topology and created a new one in the server where i'm running Lync deployment wizard. memberserver\rtc. But, n
-
I have a pile of miniDV tapes that I want to use as source material for various video projects. To do this I plug in the camcorder, find the right tape, capture the entire tape and then edit in iMovie. Now I have discovered OneStep iDVD so I'm thinki