Routing messages

Hi,
I have :
- a domain A as test1.com
- a domain B as test2 .com
- a domain C as test3 .com
Only the A domain is local, and i must route messages to domain B or C on a relay machine.
I tried this :
imtra.cnf
! intra
.test2.com $U%$D@chan_intra-daemon
.test3.com $U%$D@chan_intra-daemon
And added the following channel (imta.cnf)
! chan_intra-daemon
chan_intra smtp mx daemon 10.0.0.1 single_sys subdirs 20 dequeue_removeroute maxjobs 7 pool SMTP_POOL maytlsserver allowswitchchannel saslswitchchannel tcp_auth missingrecipientpolicy 4 disablesourcespamfilter
chan_intra-daemon
where 10.0.0.1 is the relay.
It doesn't work.
How can i do this so ?
Thanks a lot.

Create domain B and C within Messaging Server. Add a "domainsmarthost" for those domains, pointing to your relay box. done.
Remove what you already did. It's neither needed nor a good idea.

Similar Messages

Dual-routing messages in gateway/ext-domain

Here's another question related to our impending rollout of Groupwise to
our stores...
Currently, our stores' POS systems receive text messages via the
mainframe. To allow corporate users with Groupwise to send mail to the
stores, we set up many years ago an external domain and set up each
store as an external user in this external domain. Then, using the 4.2
API gateway, all mail sent to any of these external users is dumped in
the ATT_OUT and API_OUT folders which is then picked up on a timed
basis by the mainframe and delivered to the store's POS system.
Now, using SLES10 and a Linux portal, we are going to give each of the
stores a REAL groupwise address with a REAL mailbox.
What I'd like to know is... is it possible to route messages sent to
the external user back to the new real mailbox while the conversion
process is taking place. In other words, we've got to convert 1300
stores and this process will take several months. Thus, we won't be
able to turn off the api gateway all at once and it will take some time
for systems and users to start using the new mailboxes.
So... if an internal groupwise person sent a groupwise message to
external user 10337.POS (where 10337 is the external user and POS is
the external domain), could the message still be placed in the
API_OUT/ATT_OUT folder of the gateway so the mainframe could pick it up
while simultaneously the message is routed to store10337.PRI_DOMAIN or
[email protected]?
Jim
jgosney

jgosney,
It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
- Do a search of our knowledgebase at http://support.novell.com/search/kb_index.jsp
- Check all of the other support tools and options available at http://support.novell.com in both the "free product support" and "paid product support" drop down boxes.
- You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the correct newsgroup. (http://support.novell.com/forums)
If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
Good luck!
Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
http://support.novell.com/forums/

Workflow Process Manager - Could not route message to WfProcMgr with regist

Hi,
We recently started getting a strange error in our DEV environment:
Could not route message to WfProcMgr with registered key (null)
This is happening with the Server Component, Workflow Process Manager, and all services associated with this.
We are using Siebel v7.8.2.8. If anybody can provide any pointers, it would be of great help!
Thanks

Hi Trym,
Thanks for your time!
The target workflow that I am triggering from the WfProcMgr is a custom workflow and it does not have a BO defined. So, the Object Id should not be a mandatory field (I am in any case, not passing any Object Id). Nevertheless, whether I have an Object Id or I do not, I would assume that the Workflow would at least get triggered. I donot see as to why the Workflow would not trigger at all.
Though Siebel does act weird at times, I think the error I am getting is still somehow related to the actual cause! I would really like to understand as to where is this Registered Key stored in Siebel that it is continually searching for.
*When you say "Workflow Process Manager server component directly" do you mean like in a eScript
call in e.g. a Business Service?*
Please refer the second part of my previous post for this. I am trying through Server Requests BS and through Workflow Policies.
Thanks.

Sockets and ports - routing messages between machines? helpppp!

Hi,
I'm new to java and am hoping someone out there can help me, hoping this is an ok place to post this:
If all you need to create a connection is an IP address and a port number, using streams...
Can you route messages from A to B then from B to C, where A looks up C through B having a hash table which contains C's IP address and port number?
And how in the first instance does B know about A's IP address? All the examples I've seen the IP address is hard coded?
Thanks in advance!

I'm not sure what you are really trying to do... Can you explain in more concrete terms? Are you writing a chat client + server or something like that?

Eliminating excessive dhcpcd add/remove default route messages

I've been on an IPv6 network for the past several months. I use no network manager (aside from netctl and wifi-menu) and I'm generally wired in. I manually start dhcpcd on my eth0 when I start my computer.
The issue I've been having and have been unable to resolve is the fact that the following two messages have been repeating in my log every 2-10 seconds for the past several months and I now have several thousand of them. It's just getting annoying at this point because it interferes with actually reading relevant log messages via journalctl:
Mar 22 10:45:56 kcuzner-desktop dhcpcd[1109]: eth0: adding default route via fe80::fa8f:caff:fe2d:b464
Mar 22 10:45:56 kcuzner-desktop dhcpcd[1109]: eth0: removing default route via fe80::fa8f:caff:fe2d:b464
No matter what I search, I can't seem to find a way to get rid of these. I keep a terminal open with journalctl -f running almost always and it's just filled with these, quickly pushing away relevant messages such as "codeblocks dumped core". Does anyone have any tips for preventing these sorts of log entries?
Last edited by Los Frijoles (2015-03-22 18:27:41)

I don't think there is a way for journalctl to exclude logging from only dhcpcd. Of course, you can filter the real time logging to the group of units that you do want to watch but I think you want to watch everything else, right?
How about trying systemd-networkd rather than dhcpcd? Or, if you are only concerned about certain priority level messages, set the priority level. If everything you want to monitor is priority 4 and below for example, and if this message priority is 6, then you're all set.
Last edited by nullified (2015-03-22 19:43:59)

Routing message content

Hi,
Look at the following xml message:
<message>
           <a> 1 <\a>
           <a> 2 <\a>
           <a> 1 <\a>
           <a> 2 <\a>
<\message>
I want to rout all lines where "a = 1" to output file "1.txt" and all lines where "a = 2" to "2.txt.".
I know it can be done by a "hard-coded" MM. yet, I want to enable max abstraction level and shift as mush as possible logic to the configuration phase.
Plz offer possible solutions?
Regards
Edited by: uri karagila on Aug 17, 2008 1:18 PM
Edited by: uri karagila on Aug 17, 2008 1:18 PM

the best way to do this is to maintain the logic in the MM. So you have split message mapping one set of values goes to message 1 and the other goes to message 2,
then you maintain the conditions in the interface determination.

Routing messages in BPM

Hi,
I have the following scenario:
I send an IDOC from SAP R/3 to PI. In PI this IDOC is sent to a BPM.
In the BPM an select-statement is performed to get additional data from an external database
Then a mapping is performed and I have to update the same database with the new data.
Now it is getting more complicated because I have 2 sending R/3 systems and 2 receiving external databases, but I have only 1 PI system
So,
System A ---> PI system Z --> select-statement in database X --> PI system Z --> mapping --> update database X
System B ---> PI system Z --> select-statement in database Y --> PI system Z --> mapping --> update database Y
It is possible to route the select-statement to the correct database using Context-objects in the receiver determination, because SNDPOR is still filled with the R/3 Port. After the database select this context is not available anymore. So I can not route the update statement anymore.
How can I fill context objects with the correct data?
Thanks
Ron

Hi Jaishankar,
The BPM looks like this
Receive step --> receiving the IDOC in the BPM
Synchronous Send Step --> select statement to database
Transformation Step --> to determine the database updates
Synchronous Send Step --> update statement to database
In the receiver determination (configuration) of the first synchronous send step I can use the Context Object SNDPOR, because this contains the port of the sending system (eg SAPA or SAPB). With this information I can find the correct receiver (eg when SNDPOR = SAPA go to database X)
But in when I arrive at the second send step SNDPOR is nog filled anymore. So I don't have the possibility to find the correct database.
Is there a way to store this info somewhere in context objects?
ROn

Routing Message based on FileName

Hi all,
          I hav a scenario where I need to route the file based on the file name.
         for eg: if the 10th char of the filename is 'A' then it has to be placed in Location 1
                      if the 10th char of the filename is 'B' then it has to be placed in location 2.
     Both sender and receiver are file adapters.
     I thought of using condition in Intrface Determination (Context object) , but got stuck since I have to comapare only the 10th char not all the characters since other characters are dynamic.
Note: This is a pass through Interface and no mapping is involved.
Thanks,
Siva

Hi,
      I am using Context Object functionality for routing purpose.
     In XPath we can use SubString Function but we can not use the same Function in Context Object.
     Is there any workaround for this.
Thanks,
Siva

Routing messages in ESB

Hi..
I am trying to achieve something like this in an ESB project in JDev:
I have a routing service which accepts user credentials and then calls
a webservice to get the session id. I want to further route the return value of this call to another routing service which accepts a session id and then contacts another webservice to get some information.
How do I achieve this ?

Hi,
I suggest to try this forum:
SOA Suite
Its the SOA Suite.
Frank

Routing messages from a specific sender to a folder in Mail

Can I have Mail messages from a specific sender sent or copied to a dedicated folder automatically?
Thanks.

Hi Edward,
Thanks for visiting Apple Support Communities.
You can use rules in Mail to do exactly that. See this article for more information:
Mail (Mountain Lion): Manage messages using rules
http://support.apple.com/kb/PH11738
Regards,
Jeremy

Error deabbreviating and creating the routed message weblogic.rmi.ConnectException

Hello,
Did anyone encounter the following exception which follows by a
disconnection of the server from another application.
Would appreciate any comment.
thank you,
Rami

weblogic.rmi.ConnectException can happen for number of reasons, can you give
more detail on what version of WLS you are using and also a complete
stacktrace might give you a clue to point out the reason why the connection
failed in the first place.
"Rami A." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
Hello,
Did anyone encounter the following exception which follows by a
disconnection of the server from another application.
Would appreciate any comment.
thank you,
Rami

Re-Routing Messages

Hey,
If anyone has a minute, I'd appreciate some help..
We are going to conduct a trial of some anti-spam products. In order to facilitate this, I need to set up an MTA that will accept connections from the internet, perform recipient checking for one domain (abc.com.au, and subdomains that are configured as associateddomains in the directory) and then forward any accepted emails on to our normal MTA's for virusscanning and delivery.
It will also need to be configured to accept mail for another domain that isn't in LDAP (def.com.au) and forward it to our normal MTA's without recipient checking.
I've attempted to add a daemon keyword to the tcp_intranet channel without success. I've also attempted to add a rewrite rule that would direct everything to our normal MTA's, however that broke recipient checking.
If anyone is able to suggest something, I'd really appreciate it.

Hi,
Could you please provide a bit more information.
1. What version you are running (imsimta version)
2. Your current tcp_intranet channel definition lines (from imta.cnf)
3. The output of imsimta test -rewrite <LDAP defined address>
4. Log lines from your attempts.
Adding:
daemon <virus scanning server>
to the end of the tcp_intranet channel should be enough assuming:
- The emails in question are actually going via the tcp_intranet channel (hence the need for (3))
- You have rebuilt the configuration. Make sure you run "imsimta refresh" after making the change.
With regards to relaying external emails, this should be as simple as the following (once tcp_intranet is successfully relaying emails to the virus scanning server):
def.com.au $U%$D@tcp_intranet-daemon
Cheers,
Shane.

Maps is not working resolution is terrible not getting the correct location also unable to calculate the route message appear directions not available

Please resolve the maps issue on iO6 as it is not working properly resolution is very bad not getting correct locations direction are not available appears while calculating route

Please resolve the maps issue on iO6 as it is not working properly resolution is very bad not getting correct locations direction are not available appears while calculating route

I can't add a DN to a CTI route point on Call manager due to...

Hello,
I'm trying to add a DN to a CTI route point which routes to Unity directly. This allows me to have a voicemail box be reachable that is not tied to a phone. So I can dial XXXX and leave a message for this person directly. The reason we have this setup is because 2 people share a phone and we have a call handler on the phone extension to route messages to person 1 or person 2 by pushing 1 or 2 if know one picks up the phone. The caller then obviously can leave the private message for person 1 or person 2 depending on who they wanted to talk to. I have the CTI route point up and running, and it works for 2 DNs that are set up on it. I'm adding a 3rd and 4th DN to this route point.
The error message I receive says:
"Add failed. Sum of device's line appearance values for maxNumCalls exceed device limitation". On the Multiple Call/Call Waiting Settings on Device ROUTE_TO_VM section(the name I gave the CTI ROUTE POINT) I keep changing the Max number of calls to 1 and busy trigger to 1 to see if this resolves it but it does not. I had to do this on the other DNs tied to this route point and that fixed the issue. This time it will not let me.
Any ideas?

Do you mean I should be adding a new separate CTI Route Point for each DN? I didn't think I had to because we have a separate one called FORWARDtoUnity and there 4 DNs tied to this one and underneath association information, it says "Line {5} - Add a new DN"...so it seems I can keep adding more. (Unless there is a limit of DNs per route point). So since this one has 4 DNs, I thought I could have 4 DNs on this new route point I created. I was wondering if I'm missing a step somewhere.

Terminate messages without using BPM?

Hi,
Does anybody know if you can terminate messages with content based routing without ending up with messages in error state.
example
I receive IDOCs from R/3 where some should be handled and sent to a receiving system and some should not be handled at all and thus terminated. If you define a content based routing for just the ones which are supposed to be handled the rest of the messages end up in error state since no receiver is found. Ideally it would be possible to route messages to a "null" receiver without getting errors, anybody know of such a possibility? I know this can be achieved with a BPM but in this case that creates a lot of unnecessary workload for limited functionality...
Kind regards Johan Göthberg

Hi Johan,
you can try creating a dummy receiver - like ftp/file receiver and send those wrong message to this receiver?
this way wou'd have everything correct and all "wrong" message in one place (ftp or something)?
Regards,
michal

Routing messages

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for