Routing rules for backup switch in a VRRP configuration/topology

Hi,
I would like to figure out which is the best solution to the following:
A main switch(5412zl) has a common base static route 0.0.0.0 to the firewall.
The main switch is directly connected to the firewall through a normal rj-45 network cable.
What type of routing configuration should I have on the backup switch, so that traffic flows to the firewall if the main switch is unavailable?
Thank you in advance for your help.
This question was solved.
View Solution.

Hi:
You may also want to post your question on the HP Business Support Forum -- LAN Routing section
http://h30499.www3.hp.com/t5/LAN-Routing/bd-p/lan-routing-forum#.U5eFAP1OXGg
or ProCurve / ProVision-Based Switches section.
http://h30499.www3.hp.com/t5/ProCurve-ProVision-Based/bd-p/switching-e-series-forum#.U5eFL_1OXGg

Similar Messages

How to setup a routing rule for a specific file type for the content organizer?

Hello,
how can I set a routing rule for a specific file type, for example for "pdf" or for "docx", for my content organizer?
As standard I can only choose for the rules the content type, name and title of the file uploaded.
Thank you in advance!
JohnyG

Hi Johny,
Based on your description, my understanding is that you want to create a routing rule for a specific file type.
I recommend to create rules with the conditions as the image below shows for the Document content type(for example: .docx files):
Best regards.
Thanks
Victoria Xia
TechNet Community Support

Time Capsule just for backups, not for wifi.

I used to use my Time Capsule for both backups and wifi but constantly had issues, so I just disconnected it in favor of a simple Airport Express. No issues since switching, but now I have this Time Capsule just sitting here and don't do automatic backups any longer...I would like to use solely for back ups, I don't need these backups to be wireless, just for use with Time Machine. I can't find the answer by google, any suggestions?

I am trying to do the same thing but I am having an issue.
I, too, was having issues with using the Time Capsule (new one-2T) as a router and for backup (the Internet was dropping all the time). So I bought a separate router (ASUS RT-N56U) and have that plugged into my Motorola modem. The Time Capsule I have plugged into the router.
Airport Utility and I have become best friends as of late with all the problems I am having and my TC keeps getting lost-AU says that it was part of my network and now can't be found. Strangely, if I go to Open Network Settings from the menu bar and select Assist Me--->Diagnostics--->Select my network--->Continue and when the window pops up about Always Allow Keychain, I click on Always Allow. And that seems to correct the problem with my TC not being found/part of the network. This happens all the time lately.... Ever since I got the new router.
So if you or anyone have any insight into what is going on.... I will try it! Thanks for the help, Judy

Can we write more than one routing rule in a RS?

Can we write more than one routing rule in a RS?

You can specify multiple routing rules for a single operation of a routing service. If no filter is applied, they are all executed. For routing rules with filters, only the target operations for which the filter condition holds are invoked. Priority is based on the order in which they appear in the routing rules window.
Ronald

Report router rules and drop off library in Sharepoint

Hi,
I am running the report from the Report Setting link in Duet Enterprise. I get the message saying, 'The report has been submitted for processing and will be delivered to your Reports page".
But i am not getting any reports in the reports page. After googling, i got to know that i will have to confiure the Report Routing rules for the same. Also a Drop off library needs to be maintained.
Could anyone please explain the detailed steps for doing both these activities? Being a SAP expert, i dont know much about SharePoint sites.
~ Ramanath

Hi,
lets perform some checks to see where we are actually failing.
The error
User may not be a Duet user.
SAP system not configured or changed on add-on.
SAPID passed was not present in the master system.
means that somewhere on the server where the report is running the information that is retrieved from the SCL server is not correct. In your case these two systems (the server that is running the report and the SCL) are the same, but technically the flow is similar to the case that both would be on seperate system.
So the first thing I would check is if the RFC destination and the logical port that was configured is correct.
(all the following steps are done on the SCL in your case):
At first go to LPCONFIG and search for the Proxy Class: /OSP/CO_REP_ADAPTER_WSVI_DOCUM with Default Port checked.
Make sure that this logical port is active, then go to the Call Parameters tab. Here you should see in the HTTP Destination an entry IWCNT_REPT_ACT_HTTP_DEST.
Double click on that (don't save any changes if you get a prompt) and you will end up in SM59. Here you should see in the target host field the hostname of the SCL server. Under Service No. the HTTPS Port of your SCL system and finally in Path Prefix you should see something like this:
/sap/bc/srt/pm/iwcnt/repadapterwsvi_document/001/duet_enterprise_assertion/1/binding_t_https_a_http__-iwcnt_-repadapterwsvi_document_duet_enterprise_assertion
Before performing a connection test, go to the "Logon & Security" tab. Here you should see in the "Logon with Ticket" secion "Send Assertion Ticket for Dedicated Target System" checked and also SSL Active in the Status of Secure Protocol. The SSL Certificate is set to "ANONYM SSL Client (Anonymous)".
If that is all the case, then click on "Connection Test". The result should be a HTTP 415.
Let me know if that helps.
Regards,
Holger.

Business connector routing rule problem

Hi All, I am currently working with BC 4.0 and trying to change the service via developer and I see the changes are not at all reflected when I execute it.
Also, even though I do not have routing rule for executing a service from a RFC call, the old and hidden service is getting executed and do not know where the old service can be stored and how the routing rule is getting triggered even though i do not see in webconsole-->routing rule tab.
I tried to reset the cache in developer and also in the server. But all I see is old service is getting executed with out routing rule and the code for old service.
I would be greatful if someone can help me on this.

HI,
Once done modification need to active in change list window after that refresh cache it will reflect, generally it will take time to reflect due to server application burden.
Most of the routing rules are mentioned in receiver determination condition window, check it once again. It will solve

Create Rule for "Boolean" field attribute

Hi all,
I'm having a problem creating a Rule which references the value from a Checkbox in my User Form (hence, Boolean).
I know how to create Rule to reference string values. But, apparently, the syntax is not the same when referencing a *"checkbox*" value.
Here is the Rule I created :
*<Rule name='Rule for Checkbox'>*
*<switch>*
*<ref>checkboxvalue</ref>*
*<case>*
*<isTrue>*
*<ref>checkboxvalue</ref>*
*</isTrue>*
*<setvar name='MyTextField'>*
*<s>Yes</s>*
*</setvar>*
*</case>*
*<case>*
*<isFalse>*
*<ref>checkboxvalue</ref>*
*</isFalse>*
*<setvar name='MyTextField'>*
*<s>No</s>*
*</setvar>*
*</case>*
*</switch>*
*<MemberObjectGroups>*
*<ObjectRef type='ObjectGroup' id='#ID#Top' name='Top'/>*
*</MemberObjectGroups>*
*</Rule>*
In other words : if the Checkbox in my User Form is ticked (meaning, if the value is TRUE), then IDM should automatically allocate a value of "*YES"* to that text field in my user form *(MyTextField)*
If the checkbox is not ticked, then the value of *"NO"* should be displayed in the Text Field.
Is my syntax wrong?
Thanks

It depends on how you're generating the email. If you use a workflow it is relatively easy.
Change the rule to (note that I added the rule argument, it's not really necessary, it just cleans the code up):
<Rule name='Get To Address'>
    <RuleArgument name="boxvalue"/>
     <cond>
         <isTrue>
             <ref>boxvalue</ref>
         </isTrue>
         <s>[email protected]</s>
         <s>[email protected], [email protected]</s>
     </cond>
<MemberObjectGroups>
    <ObjectRef type='ObjectGroup' id='#ID#Top' name='Top'/>
</MemberObjectGroups>
</Rule>Using the workflow service directly.
<Activity>
    <Variable name="to">
        
        <rule name="Get To Address">
          <argument name="boxvalue">
              <ref>checkboxvalue</ref>
          </argument>
        </rule>
    </Variable>
<Action id='0' application='com.waveset.provision.WorkflowServices'>
    <Argument name='op' value='notify'/>
    <Argument name='template' value='yourtemplate'/>
    <Argument name='to' value='$(to)'/>
    <Argument name="from" value="[email protected]"/>
    <Argument name="some_template_argument">
        <s>some value</s>
    </Argument>
    <Argument name='catch' value='notificationException'/>
</Action>
</Activity>Using the notify workflow subprocess is nearly identical. (I recommend this because retries are taken care of for you but it's up to you.)
Finally your template is simple again. IDM should fill in the to value on based on the "to" variable you provided in the "to" argument. The "to" variable in turn was set by the rule.
<EmailTemplate
id="#ID#EmailTemplate:yourtemplate"
name='yourtemplate'
smtpHost='$(smtpHost)'
htmlEnabled='false'
authEnabled='$(authEnabled)'
userId='$(userId)'
password='$(password)'
ssl='$(ssl)'
ignoreCert='$(ignoreCert)'>

<subject>Your Subject</subject>
<body>
Hello. The argument was $(some_template_argument).
</body>
<MemberObjectGroups>
    <ObjectRef type='ObjectGroup' id='#ID#All' name='All'/>
</MemberObjectGroups>
</EmailTemplate>

What's "SAVE" configuration command for Cisco switch/ router?

What's "SAVE" configuration command for Cisco switch / router? I know Switch#copy running-config startup-config works well,
but so long, any other command that easy to remenber?

What's "SAVE" configuration command for Cisco switch / router? I know Switch#copy running-config startup-config works well, but so long,
any other command that easy to remenber?
yes, here: Switch#write,and want to know more about the Cisco switch, please visit:http://www.3anetwork.com/cisco-switches-price_c1

Possible to simultaneously use time capsule for backup + another router for internet?

I will soon be moving into an apartment in which my landlord provides wireless internet through her own router.
I also have my own Time Capsule, which I'd like to continue to use to back up my Mac via Time Machine.
Is it possible to connect to both my Time Capsule (for backup only) and another router (for internet only) at the same time?
If not, can anyone suggest a good workaround?

moskovit wrote:
I've done a little research, and it looks like I might be able to wirelessly daisy chain the two routers, using WDS (wireless distribution system), assuming my landlord's router supports it, but that this would drop the speed of the internet significantly: https://discussions.apple.com/thread/2623802?start=0&tstart=0
It works extremely poorly and the landlord would need to agree to it.. plus it would require use of WEP security which is hackable by children with internet hack kits in about 2min flat. Don't go there. Apple have made their products incompatible with most other routers. So any suggestion of a workaround will involve spending some money on your part.
You could buy a airport express and plug that into the main router by ethernet.. again if allowed. Your TC can do wireless bridge to another apple product very well. Messy but could work. It is not that expensive to get a second hand AEBS and use that. You don't need the latest products but wireless range would be better in the AEBS than AE.
So I'm still wondering: Is there another workaround? Is there a way to get my mac to connect to my time capsule (for backup) and another router (for internet) simultaneously, or is that just technologically impossible? If it's impossible, is there another solution?
You cannot wirelessly connect to two different wireless devices at once on one client. You need to either have a second wireless client in the laptop.. for instance a USB stick which can be fairly tiny nowadays. It is just you need to find one with Mac drivers. Or the TC must have internet connectivity. You could get that by buying a wireless bridge, and using that in your room, with the TC plugged into it. Universal wireless bridge devices are fairly cheap, but can be a pain to setup. Look for products that work with the main router and use as fast a speed as possible. It can be a tricky setup as you need the wireless bridge working on one channel and the TC working on another. What I am suggesting is the WDS solution you found but using two different boxes to do it. And not using WDS at all, unless the main router is suitable, but rather universal bridge.
The hassle of all that suggests to me,, I would go for the wireless stick, so your Mac laptop has two wireless clients.
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/iMAC-MAC-Apple-Airport-G3-G4-G5-OS-X-USB-WIRELESS-CAR D-/290538112833?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item43a56bc741
I have no idea if this works just to show you what I mean. Please do research it yourself.
An ethernet connection to the TC is far superior solution albeit would require you to plug and unplug it.

Router "snmp-server contact" command for catalyst switches??

From the router you can configure the "snmp-server contact <text>" command
to set the system contact for SNMP. Is there any equivalent command for
Catalyst switches? I know that there's a "set system contact" command for
CatOS but i'm sure if it has something to do with SNMP.
Thanks in advance.

Yes, set system contact on switch is the same that on the router for the above command. Once you use this this command to enter the contact info, it can be polled via the SNMP MIB Object sysContact (.1.3.6.1.2.1.1.4) from RFC1213-MIB. Example, if I use 'set system contact foo', I see the following using the 'show system' output:
System Name System Location System Contact CC
foo
Polling the above via the above MIB object on the switch:
% snmpwalk .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.4
system.sysContact.0 = foo
Similarly, if you set the 'System Name' on the switch using the command 'set system name ', can be polled via sysName (.1.3.6.1.2.1.1.5) from RFC1213-MIB
Lastly, 'set system location ', once set can be polled via sysLocation (.1.3.6.1.2.1.1.6) from RFC1213-MIB

Ever since upgrading to Yosemite on my Mac, I can only configure my time capsule via iPhone. My Mac cannot locate for backup, but CAN find as my internet router. I have followed all suggestions I can locate and have upgraded to newest version.

Time Capsule in Yosemite can be used for router/internet but Mac cannot locate for backups.

Please read this whole message before doing anything.
This procedure is a test, not a solution. Don’t be disappointed when you find that nothing has changed after you complete it.
Step 1
The purpose of this step is to determine whether the problem is localized to your user account.
Enable guest logins* and log in as Guest. Don't use the Safari-only “Guest User” login created by “Find My Mac.”
While logged in as Guest, you won’t have access to any of your documents or settings. Applications will behave as if you were running them for the first time. Don’t be alarmed by this behavior; it’s normal. If you need any passwords or other personal data in order to complete the test, memorize, print, or write them down before you begin.
Test while logged in as Guest. Same problem?
After testing, log out of the guest account and, in your own account, disable it if you wish. Any files you created in the guest account will be deleted automatically when you log out of it.
*Note: If you’ve activated “Find My Mac” or FileVault, then you can’t enable the Guest account. The “Guest User” login created by “Find My Mac” is not the same. Create a new account in which to test, and delete it, including its home folder, after testing.
Step 2
The purpose of this step is to determine whether the problem is caused by third-party system modifications that load automatically at startup or login, by a peripheral device, by a font conflict, or by corruption of the file system or of certain system caches.
Please take this step regardless of the results of Step 1.
Disconnect all wired peripherals except those needed for the test, and remove all aftermarket expansion cards, if applicable. Start up in safe mode and log in to the account with the problem. You must hold down the shift key twice: once when you turn on the computer, and again when you log in.
Note: If FileVault is enabled in OS X 10.9 or earlier, or if a firmware password is set, or if the startup volume is a software RAID, you can’t do this. Ask for further instructions.
Safe mode is much slower to start up and run than normal, with limited graphics performance, and some things won’t work at all, including sound output and Wi-Fi on certain models. The next normal startup may also be somewhat slow.
The login screen appears even if you usually log in automatically. You must know your login password in order to log in. If you’ve forgotten the password, you will need to reset it before you begin.
Test while in safe mode. Same problem?
After testing, restart as usual (not in safe mode) and verify that you still have the problem. Post the results of Steps 1 and 2.

Advance Rules for routing in Oracle BPM Human Task

Hi,
I am working on SOA 11.1.1.5.0. I have created a sample SOA application with a Human Task.
following are the Assignment details for my Human Task.
1. Created a stage1
2. Created a participant with following details
Type = Single
Build a list of participant using : ApproverGroup
Specify attribute using : Rule-Based
List Ruleset : SampleRuleset
I have created some Advance Rules for routing as specified at http://www.orastudy.com/oradoc/selfstu/fusion/integration.1111/e10224/bp_hwfmodel.htm#BABGJGBD .Routing is perfectly working in my application.
But when I login into WorklitApplication via weblogic user and accessed Administration link, under Task Configuration > Data Driven tab these Routing Rules are not appearing, however I can see this SampleRuleset there.
I want to know whether these Routing Rules will be appeared in the WorklistApplication or not?
regards,

Hi,
Concerning your first question the answer is yes, you can share the same UI with various Human Tasks. Assuming that your discriminator flag is the human task type, then you can create for example a taskflow parameter, pass this value and based on this value hide and show fields. You will have to bundle your UI project as an ADF shared library and attach it to each Human Task project that you would like to use it, drag and dropping the taskflow as a region (please have in mind that your taskflow pages definition should be set to fragments).
For you second question, again the answer is yes. This is an out-of-the-box functionality provided by the auto-generated human task. There is a section called history that holds and displays all this information.
For the third point, again the answer is yes. What you can do is that you can enable the OnTaskCompleted event so that whenever a participant complete their task to generate an event. Then you can have a mediator or a BPEL process that can subscribe to this event and process the notification.
For question 4 i don't think that is possible (out of the box). You will have to write like a proxy service that will fetch this additional information from your LDAP server and map it to your participants list.
Question 5, the organizational chart allows you to define the structure and hierarchy of your organization (users, groups, application roles) which can be used in your business processes to define your various approval types.
For you last question, the shared flag is used for to define whether your logical roles (also called application roles) should be specific to a process or can be shared across processes.
Regards
Antonis

How to switch iphone 5 to new pc for backup and sync. lost drive on old pc.

How to switch iphone 5 to new pc for backup and sync without losing anythinng. Lost drive on old pc.

Copy the ENTIRE iTunes folder from the old computer or the backup of the old computer to the new computer.
Connect iPhone.
Sync.

[SOLVED] how to use diffrent iptables rules for different ppp account?

x86 plantform run arch linux system , have two network interface etn1 eth0 .eth1 connect to internet. eth0 connect to other terminals through switch. want use different iptables rules for different pppoe account .also want to know how to forbidden more than one terminals established pppoe link use same account at the same time .
Last edited by linuxsir (2013-09-26 06:48:01)

(You establish PPPoE sessions over the local network to the Arch machine? Which then routes the traffic?)
first question ,yes that is exactly what i am done. second question i also have a small scripts on windows pc to solve routes traffic problem
route -p delete 0.0.0.0
route -p add 192.168.9.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.9.1
route -p add 0.0.0.0 mask 0.0.0.0 192.168.22.0
but after a while i found scripts is not necessary because windows always attempt to use PPPoE sessions as default internet connection local connection is also ok
and use -i pppX in my iptables rules dose not solve my problem , because same account start PPPoE session could be marked as ppp0 or ppp1. it is hard to identified which account start session.

Advice needed for backup strategy for office

My office is switching from PC to Mac (yay!) and I'm in charge of setting up the system. We'll be using 4 iMacs and a Mac Mini Server with ethernet connections. I'd like to ask what is recommended for backing up these computers.
My thought would be to back up the iMacs separately from the server - is this definitely the way to go?
I'm thinking to get a 3TB Time Capsule for the 4 iMacs so that Time Capsule will do automatic backups.
- Is it OK to have 4 iMacs backup to one Time Capsule like this?
As for the Mac Mini server, I'm not sure how to best back it up.
Since it has two 1TB drives, I'm thinking of using one drive for data and having it automatically backup to the other internal drive. Any thoughts on this idea?
Or, it is possible to connect an external USB drive to the Time Capsule's USB port, and have Time Machine backup the server to the external drive?
Any advice is greatly appreciated!

The TC is really a home solution.
For business I think you should consider something extra.
Although 4 computers and a server is not a big setup, it is worthwhile doing a more professional backup and use something more professional than Time Machine.
For instance..
http://www.retrospect.com/au/products/mac
I have not used it.. but I see it recommended in business / larger installs. It is not cheap but well worth considering.
I would not use the internal disk of the server for backup.
As for the Mac Mini server, I'm not sure how to best back it up.
Since it has two 1TB drives, I'm thinking of using one drive for data and having it automatically backup to the other internal drive. Any thoughts on this idea?
You can raid the two disks if you don't need the capacity.
But backup to a USB drive plugged in.. USB3 drives are cheap and speedy. Much more reliable than using network drives.
Raid for integrity of working data.. backup to separate change over disks.
So weekly you change over the USB drive for backup and store the other one at home.
I'm thinking to get a 3TB Time Capsule for the 4 iMacs so that Time Capsule will do automatic backups.
- Is it OK to have 4 iMacs backup to one Time Capsule like this?
You can do this.. It is fine to have 4 Macs backup to it. But if you are not using the wireless router it is a waste.. you can just backup over network to the server.. TM works fine on network.
You can buy another 3TB USB drive for backup of the clients.. normally though you want all the working data on the server and back that up. You are thinking a more peer to peer model.. once you introduce the server you can work on a more server client model where the current files are held on the server.

Routing rules for backup switch in a VRRP configuration/topology

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for