RSPPFPROCESS - mail not triggering for incorrectly processed PO

Hi All,
I tried executing the RSPPFPROCESS by giving a variant but I am not able to get the details of any incorrectly processed purchase orders in the output.
The RSPPFPROCESS program functions in such a way that if a PO is unsuccessfully processed, then on executing the RSPPFPROCESS program with status "Unsuccessfully Processed" a mail will be triggered to the creators whose POs were incorrectly processed.
But this is not happening in my case, the mail is not getting triggered at all.
The variant details are:
Application : BBP_PD
Action Profile : BBP_PD_PO
Action Definition : STANDARD_PO
Promotion status : 2 (ie)incorrectly processed
Processing type : MET
Time of Processing : Processing when saving document
The radio buttons: Ignore "Repeat" flag and Ignore "Generated Manually" flag are checked.
The check box "Number of Actions Outputted" is checked.
Please help.
Thanx in advance.
Regards,
Mary Catherine

Hello Prasath,
Please check your configuration on ERP/ECC
side in transaction SWETYPV. Here you can enable or disable the
event type linkage for BUS2012 and for CL_SE_PUR_PO_WF_OUT or any
customer-specific business object related to Purchase Orders which might
be in use. If you disable the event linkage for CREATE and/or change
event, no message will be triggered upon PO creation.
If this is not sufficient for your business process the usual logic is
that all Purchase Order message are being sent out when the event
linkage is active (e.g. you want to send out only some of the message
types possible). In this case you might want to make use of BAdI
PUR_SE_PO_INTERFACE_OUT_SELECT (enhancement spot / BAdI)."
Enhancement Spot: PUR_SPOT_SE_PURCHASE_ORDER
BAdI Definition: PUR_SE_PO_INTERFACE_OUT_SELECT
Interface:        IF_PUR_SE_PO_IF_OUT_SELECT
BADI definition   PUR_APPL_SE_POCONF_IN_ASYN
Also in the standard, for the following messages
   PurchaseOrderChangedInformation_Out
   PurchaseOrderERPRequest_Out_V1
   PurchaseOrderERPConfirmation_Out
we are sending out these information as soon as a purchase Order is
created. We do not distinguish between the services all of them will be
triggered.
Hope this hepls
Ray

Similar Messages

Workflow mail not triggering for PO's to the Manager

Dear Seniors,
I am creating a PO and keeping in hold and later on saving the PO. But for those kind of PO's, the manager is not getting the mail for approval. But if i create a PO without keeping in hold with same data, system is triggering the mail to the manager. Why is it so? how can i make the settings to trigger the mail for hold-saved PO's. Please guide me.
Regards,
Prasath J

Hello Prasath,
Please check your configuration on ERP/ECC
side in transaction SWETYPV. Here you can enable or disable the
event type linkage for BUS2012 and for CL_SE_PUR_PO_WF_OUT or any
customer-specific business object related to Purchase Orders which might
be in use. If you disable the event linkage for CREATE and/or change
event, no message will be triggered upon PO creation.
If this is not sufficient for your business process the usual logic is
that all Purchase Order message are being sent out when the event
linkage is active (e.g. you want to send out only some of the message
types possible). In this case you might want to make use of BAdI
PUR_SE_PO_INTERFACE_OUT_SELECT (enhancement spot / BAdI)."
Enhancement Spot: PUR_SPOT_SE_PURCHASE_ORDER
BAdI Definition: PUR_SE_PO_INTERFACE_OUT_SELECT
Interface:        IF_PUR_SE_PO_IF_OUT_SELECT
BADI definition   PUR_APPL_SE_POCONF_IN_ASYN
Also in the standard, for the following messages
   PurchaseOrderChangedInformation_Out
   PurchaseOrderERPRequest_Out_V1
   PurchaseOrderERPConfirmation_Out
we are sending out these information as soon as a purchase Order is
created. We do not distinguish between the services all of them will be
triggered.
Hope this hepls
Ray

E-mail not triggering for published RFx ( Bid Invitaion) in SRM7.0

Hi Friends,
We implementing SRM7.0 with ECC6 ( Ehp4) and deploying Classic scenarion.Just configuring and testing RFx functionality.
In Vendor Master (Ext BP) I entered my Officale-mail id for testing and published one RFx. I'm expecting Bidder (means me) should get the e-mail RFx with URL of SRM to enter RFx Response with User ID and Password along with softcopy of RFx..but its not happening...
Can anyone please confirm me exactly what settings need to be done /ensured to get the Bidder, the e-mail RFx with URL of SRM to enter RFx Response with User ID and Password...any further services need to be activated.. ?
Response much appriciated.
Thanks
NAP

In front of RFx ststus is waiting (Yellow colour) with ststus Text " Wait for communications service" and in detail it mentioned
" Definition
A message was sent by the application. The status of the message is 'Waiting'.
Use
The message is in the queue. The SAPconnect send process will send the message during the next run."

User not authorized for message processing

Hi,
I have a SM59 connection from SAP PI --> SAP R3.
Targethost sapr3T.mydomain.
Path prefix: /sap/xi/engine?type=entry
Process: From PI send a message to R3 (scenarie is a Server Proxy...)
User: PIPROXY has Role SAP_XI_APPL_SERV_USER
This is not enought I get error "User not authorized for message processing" when trying the connection from my PI server. (I tried with SAP_ALL and then it works)
What would be the right user role for this operation ?
Br,
Martin

Hi all,
I have the same problem in a XI -> BW scenario (Abap proxy).
I get error "User not authorized for message processing" when try to send message from PI to BW.
(I tried with SAP_ALL and then it works)
User: PI1REMOTE has Role SAP_XI_APPL_SERV_USER and SAP_XI_IS_SERV_USER
What would be the right user role for this operation ?
Thanks
Daniele

Release strategy not triggering for Specif plant

Hi Friends
I configured a release strategy with three charecteristics. P.org, Plant, Net value.
this stretegy is triggering for specific plants which are under a particular company code, and if I change to my plant and P.org. its not triggering.
I have deleted all the classifications and release strategies from, no other data in VV_T16FS_2 , AUSP,T16FV,and T16FS tables except this release strategies data.
do we have any settings at cocode level??????
please respond if answer known
Points would be awarded for for your valuable answer.

Thank you deepak for your quick respond
Actually There were already release strategies with same charecteristics, and with the values of other plants and other P.orgs which are under certain companycode.
these were triggering perfectly for PO
Now created new strategy for plant and P.org under different plant code of different cocde. this strategy not triggering for PO.
but if the release strtegy values replaced by the erlier plants and P.org again its triggering.
Now I created new chars, class, and stategies still same problem persists.
Release stategy working for the values of a prticular company code plants, Porgs.
and already tried your suggestion Cocode as char. but same its working for only that company code not for my companycode

Preference status not changed for the processed products

Hello All,
While Aggregating the vendor declaration, I am getting the message as below
Preference status not changed for the processed products
Could you please help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks & Regards
Rahul

Hello Rahul,
aggregation is not changing status on LTVD. (Possibly LTVD has been already agregated). Newly maintained LTVD is not changing status of the product, its remaining negative whatsoever.
Kr,
Gabriel.

ChaRM: Mail not triggered when current user = mail receiver?

Dearl all:
     Ive noticed that mails are not triggered when the user who is processing a document is the same who will receive it. Is there any way to deactivate this functionality?
Thank you very much,
Federico.

Hi Miguel, how are you?
      I think it is a nice feature not sending a mail when the user who is changing the status in the one who would receive the mail in that next status. But Im in the testing pahse of implementing SOLMAN and I would like to know if this is a real feature or a flaw, and besides I would like to turn off this possible feature, just for the testing phase. This is not a big deal anyway.
    By the way, I also notice that if there is a partner assigned multiple times to a document, it doesnt trigger the mails as expected.
Best regards,
Federico.

Mails not triggering in CHARM

Hi Experts,
I have configured Solution Manager 4.0 for CHARM. It is working fine. My requirement is that, it should trigger mail whenever support team changes.
Initally, I defined a action to trigger mail once whenever a support team is assigned. It worked fine. But the problem with this setting is that, whenever I change support team, it is not triggering a mail and this is understood because I configured to trigger once only. So, I changed the setting of action to "unprocessed", it starts triggering mails whenever I change the support team.
Now Issue is that, it is also triggering the mail to support team whenever the transaction is saved (Ex: When I create change document for a support message, transaction saves automatically) even though support message is not changed. This leads to unnecessary mails.
In order to avoid unnecessary mails, I deleted the existing action and created a new one wherein start condition was not maintained but maintained setting under scheduled condition as per SAP note 865619 and implemented BADI also.
Now I am not getting a single mail whenever a support team is assigned or changed.
Any suggestion please provide.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Kumar

Hi Kumar,
This can be done very well.
For this you can implement the BADI ORDER_SAVE, method CHECK_BEFORE_SAVE.
In this method you write a code as mentioned below,
1. Use FM
WA_HEADER = IV_GUID.
Insert wa_header into table lt_header.
CALL FUNCTION 'CRM_ORDER_READ'
 EXPORTING
 IT_HEADER_GUID = lt_HEADER
 IT_ITEM_GUID =
 IMPORTING
 ET_CUSTOMER_H = lt_customer_h
 ET_ORDERADM_H = lt_orderadm_h
 ET_OPPORT_H =
 ET_PARTNER = lt_partner
 ET_STATUS = It_status
 ET_REFOBJ = lt_CRMT_refobj_WRKT
 ET_SUBJECT = lt_CRMT_SUBJECT_WRKT
 EXCEPTIONS
 DOCUMENT_NOT_FOUND = 1
 ERROR_OCCURRED = 2
 DOCUMENT_LOCKED = 3
 NO_CHANGE_AUTHORITY = 4
 NO_DISPLAY_AUTHORITY = 5
 NO_CHANGE_ALLOWED = 6
 OTHERS = 7
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
 MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
 WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
ENDIF.
2. You will get the Business Partners entered on the screen in the internal table lt_partner, read the address number1 for the partner function of the support team.
3. Get the contents from view CRMV_LINKPARTNER using the LV_GUID. And get the address number2 for partner function of the support team.
4. Compare the address number2 & address number1. If they are not equal then trigger a mail else don't.
Let me know if you need some more help.
Reward if it helps.
regards,
mahantesh

PO Response mail not triggering in SRM SUS

Hi,
We are on SRM7 wtih ECC 6, When user click on Process, Confirm all and Send for a PO from SUS corresponding XML "PurchaseOrderConfirmation_Out" not triggered in SRM.
with the same settings in Dev and Quality xml triggered successfully but not in PRD
If any one come accross the same issue, please share the solution.
Regards,

I think the shopping cart must be waiting for some approvals...
Please check the workflow log of the shopping cart...
PO will be created..once the shopping cart is released....

Mail not working for local users

I have sunOS 5.9 running on sun sparc
mail is not working on this system even for local users.
I have tried from the command prompt
mail username
Test email
^D
nothing happens after control D, I don't get command prompt.
I also tried
mail username
Test email
nothing happens
sendmail daemon is not running on this system but my understanding is that sendmail is not required. I need mail to work only for local users to receive emails for failed cron jobs etc, it is not required for this system to send or receive emails to/from outside world.
Can someone guide or point in right direction to fix mail functionlality for local users?

Actually, with recent versions of sendmail, you do need sendmail running to be able to send mail.
You never used to, but since they made sendmail no longer setuid root, you do.
Sendmail has essentially been split into 2 daemons a local queue runner with handles sending sent by local users.
And a listener daemon with listens for remote connections.
If you want to be able to send mails but not have sendmail listening, you have a couple of options.
You can either run only the local queue runner and not run the listener. In this case you have to configure the local queue runner to send mails onto a external mail host for processing. This requires editing /etc/mail/submit.cf
Alternately, you need to configure the local listener to only bind to the localhost port so it can't be contacted from external sources.
This requires editing sendmail.mc and regenerating a new sendmail.cf
I tend to favour the latter option as the former limits your ability to do things like local aliases of root: [email protected] to send all your root mail to a central account.
This is the sendmail.mc you will need
divert(0)dnl
VERSIONID(`@(#)main.mc 1.5 (Sun) 08/10/00')
OSTYPE(`solaris8')dnl
DOMAIN(`solaris-generic')dnl
DAEMON_OPTIONS(``Port=smtp, Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA'')dnl
FEATURE(`no_default_msa')dnl
MAILER(`local')dnl
MAILER(`smtp')dnl

Mail not checking for new messages in IMAP subfolders

Hello everyone,
I am disappointed to see that Mail version 3.0 (912.1/912) displays the same wrong behavior as pre-Leopard versions in the way that it fails to check for new messages in subfolders on an IMAP account (it only checks the INBOX).
One has to manually open each and every subfolder and wait a few seconds to force a resync and display any new message placed there by server-side rules processing.
So far I had been using the excellent IMAPCheck (http://macapps.perniciouspenguins.com/imapcheck/) but this is no longer supported by 10.5.
Does anybody have a workaround for this? Or the power to bug Apple engineering enough to get this solved once and for all ;o)
Thanks much,
teedeepee

This problem is not solved for all cases.
This solution only applies to server-side filtering/redirecting of messages into imap folders.
I'm having trouble with client-side mail.app rules moving new messages into imap folders and not having the new message counts displayed.
This wasn't a problem in the previous version of mail.app.
Here's to hoping that Apple posts a patch to fix this problem soon...

Enter event not triggering for read-only checkbox

I have some objects in a form that get "locked" when the user signs the form. I'm not using the digital signatures. Instead, when the user types their name into the signature text field, a script runs on the change event that makes all of the fields in the form read only. It also unlocks the fields if the signature is deleted.
I was worried that we would get a lot of phone calls with users that didn't understand that the form had locked ("Why doesn't this form work?!"), so I added some code to the enter event for all of the fields that would pop up a messagebox to explain to people trying to edit a signed form that the form was locked and that they would need to delete the signature to edit the form.
This plan works perfect for my text fields and decimal fields. It does NOT work at all for my checkboxes. For some reason, the enter event is never triggered for read-only checkboxes. I don't see any other events that would obviously work for me though. Any ideas?
Thanks

Thanks, those are reasonable suggestions.
In the first suggestion, I'm unclear about one aspect of how I would accomplish this. I assume I would allow people to modify fields in the form, but that when they did, a msgbox would pop up that would inform them that, if they continued with this modification to a signed form, the signature would be removed. I'm all good to that point. But if they answered that they do not want to continue modifying that field and removing the signature, how can I code it to set the value back to what it was before the change? Is there some method that will give me access to the value of the field BEFORE the attempted modification? I went looking for something like $.previousvalue, but found nothing.
I'd suggest that I could use a two-stage solution, in which I store the previous value on the enter event, and save it just in case they do not want to change the field when prompted by the msgbox, but since the enter event does not exist for checkboxes (my original problem), that seems like it won't work.
As far as radio button suggestion, I like radio buttons very much except for one fatal flaw: they aren't (as far as I can tell) clearable. That is a shame. Clearly some people (like me) want both exclusivity AND clearability. And we'd like the controls to have an enter event. But I know I'm demanding Anyway, as it is, I just end up having to use checkboxes and create a boatload of silly code to make them exclusive.
Emily

PO Release Strategy not triggerred for particular Total Net Order Value

Dear,
I am currently facing the issue where release strategy for purchase orders is not getting triggered for a particular value or lower.
For order value 1 INR or less, no release strategy is triggered for new created PO. And for value > 1 INR release strategy is getting triggered.
All otehr PO characterstics are the same, I mean to say the values for other characterstics such as plant material group are identical.
But the characterstics for release for Total net order value are <= 30000 INR. There are two system copies, where in one system the same release strategy is working as expected. But in other system the above mentioned issue occurs. There is no differnce which I can see in the release strategy setup.
Please suggest for solution.
Thank you.
Warm Regards.

Dear All,
While looking further into the issue by going into debugging mode, we have found that in include LCLSCF2I, Internal table p_selection_criteria_tab , the value for ATFLV (Internal Floating point from) gets different values in the two systems. For example, in the affected system, for PO with 1INR tottal value, for one of the Total value chaaracterstics before INR characterstic, ATFLV value is 0,0000000000000000E+00, hence it gets out of loop and doesn't trigger release strategy.
But in another system for same PO values and release setup, ATFLV value is 1,0000000000000000E+00 for that characterstic.
May I know how the value for this field gets calculated.
Thank you.
Warm Regards.

Alerts not triggered for a RFC Adapter

Hi All,
I have done the alert configuration for triggering alerts whenever there is a problem in any communication channels of any adapter.i.e. I have given * for 'where did the error occur'.Alerts are being triggered for JDBC and File adapetrs.but when an error occurs in a RFC adapter no alerts are triggered.What can I do about it?
Thanks and Regards,
Jishi

Jishi Abraham,
Could u please try No Restrictions in the 'where did the error occur'
All of the File, JDBC and RFC adapters, reside on the Java Stack. Whenever there is a message being processed, by any of the adapters except for IDoc and HTTP, the config should be similar as far as the alerts are concerned.
Please try No Restrictions and let us know.
Reg,
-Naveen.

After Update Trigger not triggering for first update

Hi All,
I have written a Trigger on AP_SUPPLIERS table to update AP_SUPPLIER_SITES_ALL when payment priority gets updated on AP_SUPPLIERS table. Trigger calls a pragma autonomous procedure after update happens, and updates sites table. We are on R12 (12.1.3) with DB 11.2.0.3.0
Somehow this is not working for the first update, after that for every update it is working. Any idea why this might be happening?
Trigger Code:
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER XX_AP_SUPPLIER_SIT_UPD_SYNC
AFTER UPDATE
ON AP.AP_SUPPLIERS
REFERENCING NEW AS NEW OLD AS OLD
FOR EACH ROW
DECLARE
l_vendor_id     NUMBER;
l_paym_priority NUMBER;
BEGIN
   XX_AP_SUPSITE_UPDATE(:NEW.PAYMENT_PRIORITY, :NEW.VENDOR_ID);
   EXCEPTION
     WHEN OTHERS THEN
       RAISE;
END XX_AP_SUPPLIER_SIT_UPD_SYNC;
Procedure Code:
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE APPS.XX_AP_SUPSITE_UPDATE (p_payment_priority IN NUMBER,p_vendor_id IN NUMBER) AS
PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION;
ex_custom EXCEPTION;
PRAGMA EXCEPTION_INIT( ex_custom, -20001 );
BEGIN
UPDATE AP_SUPPLIER_SITES_ALL
SET PAYMENT_PRIORITY =p_payment_priority
WHERE VENDOR_ID = p_vendor_id;
COMMIT;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
    raise_application_error( -20001, 'Error while updating payment priority on Site '||SQLERRM );
END XX_AP_SUPSITE_UPDATE;

Thanks for your replies Saubhik/VT,
now my trigger is compiled. but is not triggering. pl help me to resolve .....
create or replace
TRIGGER AUDIT_DEV.trg2
AFTER DELETE OR UPDATE OF EMP_STATUS ON AUDIT_DEV.AUDIT_PERSONS
FOR EACH ROW
declare
OSUSER varchar2(30);
     MACHINE varchar2(30);
     logon_time date;
db_user varchar2(30);
USERNAME VARCHAR2(30);
EMP_USER_MODIFIED AUDIT_PERSONS.EMP_USER_MODIFIED%TYPE;
     EMP_DATE_MODIFIED AUDIT_PERSONS.EMP_DATE_MODIFIED%TYPE;
     EMP_SK AUDIT_PERSONS.EMP_SK%TYPE;
     EMP_ID AUDIT_PERSONS.EMP_ID%TYPE;
     EMP_NAME AUDIT_PERSONS.EMP_NAME%TYPE;
EMP_RESIGNATION_DATE AUDIT_PERSONS.EMP_RESIGNATION_DATE%TYPE;
BEGIN
select     username,osuser,machine,logon_time into db_user,osuser,machine,logon_time from v$session where sid=(select sid from v$mystat where rownum=1);
INSERT INTO AUDIT_DEV.AUDIT_PERSONS_LOG (EMP_USER_MODIFIED,EMP_DATE_MODIFIED,EMP_SK,EMP_ID,EMP_NAME,EMP_RESIGNATION_DATE,EMP_STATUS_OLD,EMP_STATUS_NEW,osuser,db_user,machine)
VALUES(EMP_USER_MODIFIED,EMP_DATE_MODIFIED,EMP_SK,EMP_ID,EMP_NAME,EMP_RESIGNATION_DATE,:old.EMP_status,:new.EMP_status,osuser,db_user,machine );
COMMIT;
END;
09:59:06 AUDIT_DEV@dev>UPDATE AUDIT_DEV.AUDIT_PERSONS SET EMP_STATUS='TEST' WHERE EMP_ID='4234';
EMP_STATUS
TEST
1 row selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.01
10:00:03 AUDIT_DEV@dev>commit;
Commit complete.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.01
10:00:17 AUDIT_DEV@dev>select * from AUDIT_persons_log;
no rows selected
Elapsed: 00:00:00.00
10:00:17 AUDIT_DEV@dev>
Edited by: Abk on Nov 4, 2010 10:42 AM

RSPPFPROCESS - mail not triggering for incorrectly processed PO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for