RSUPDINFO does not contain transfer rules CODEID's

I did the following:
1)  Go into table RSAABAP and got all the CODEID's for my search string.  
2)  Take those CODEID values and use them as a filter for table RSUPDROUT.  No entries came back which tells me that these CODEID's are NOT for update rules.
3) Tables RSUPDROUT and  RSUPDINFO only contain update rule code and not transfer rule and not start routine code.
Where can I get the same info as table RSUPDINFO for transfer rule and start routine CODEID?  Any input would be very much appreciated. 
I am trying to come up with a list of transfer routines, update rules and start routines that contains a certain search string. I can get the list of CODEID from RSAABAP table but based on the CODEID alone, I can't locate the name of the cube, infosource, etc. if the CODEID is not an update rule.

A.H.P.,
Thanks - almost there because of your help! I executed SE16 for table RSRSRULES and entered CONVROUT_L = 10 CODEID's and got back only 4 CODEID's back.  Why didn't it show me  records for all the 10 CODEID's I entered?
This table holds transfer rule info, do you know what table holds start routine code?  Maybe the 6 missing CODEID's are start routines and are held in a different table.
(I switched company so that why was I had to create another SDN user ID).
Thanks,
Thao

Similar Messages

  • Not getting transfer rules for 2LIS_02_HDR , 2LIS_02_ITM and 2LIS_02_SCL

    Hello Bi experts,
    Actually i am implementing standard Purchasing module in BI system.
    While implementing , i have installed cube 0PUR_C04 with data flow before options.
    After installation , i am not getting transfer rule for 2LIS_02_HDR , 2LIS_02_ITM and 2LIS_02_SCL .
    I am getting transfer rule for 2LIS_02_S011 only.
    0PUR_c04 contains these 4 dataspurces - 2LIS_02_HDR , 2LIS_02_ITM and 2LIS_02_SCL , 2LIS_02_S011 .
    So how can i get these transfer rule. and if we want to implement std Purchasing module in BI , which Cubes are required or necessary.
    In metadata repository also , for Cube 0PUR_c04 , it does not showing transfer rule HDR/ITM/SCL. there also it is now showing transfer rules.
    I will be also very thankful if anybody just give me overview of purchasing.
    Thanks,
    Sada.

    Hello Mani,
    Thanks a lot.you are the first one who has answered my que. which i expect .
    Look at following floe in infoprovider in my system. and please tell me what exactly i should do?
    Cube->Purchasing Groups                                                                                0PUR_C04
               Update Rule->0PUR_C04 2LIS_02_HDR                                                                       AY0XVMCJPXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                    Infosource->Purchasing Data (Document Header Level) as of 2.0B      2LIS_02_HDR
               Update Rule->0PUR_C04 2LIS_02_ITM                                                                         4YSO2PF9XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                     INfosource->Purchasing Data (Document Item Level) as of 2.0B          2LIS_02_ITM
               Update Rule->0PUR_C04 2LIS_02_S011                                                                      CSB3FHGQXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                     Infosurce->Purchasing groups                                                               2LIS_02_S011
                                                      Transfer Rule->from 2LIS_02_S011 for SC4 Client 600        2LIS_02_S011                  SCXCLNTXXX
                                                                             Datasource->Purchasing groups                    2LIS_02_S011
               Update Rule->0PUR_C04 2LIS_02_SCL                                                                        4ZZ0DMZXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                     Infosource->Pur.Data (Document Schedule Line Level)                         2LIS_02_SCL
    Mani i am expecting answer from you.
    Thanks,
    Sada

  • Request does not contain any saved update rules; rollback not possible

    Hi,
    In BW on hana, there's a 3.x flow DSO where it loaded a request from PSA.
    It failed due to activation error SID Generation.  But unfortunately, due to PSA Deletion process chain, it's PSA Request got deleted.
    Now, we couldn't delete the red request(failed request) from the 3.x flow DSO.
    If we try to delete, it shows job has been completed successfully with the following message:
    Job started
    Step 001 started (program RSDELPART1, variant &0000000004233, user ID )
    Delete running: DataStore object ZREBATE, from 630,138 to 630,138
    Delete is scheduled; Selection conditions were substituted
    Request REQU_6412GVIEWBJ0TZZIMZE2TZIOR does not contain any saved update rules; rollback not possible
    Deletion of request REQU_6412GVIEWBJ0TZZIMZE2TZIOR from data target ZREBATE failed
    Deletion of request REQU_6412GVIEWBJ0TZZIMZE2TZIOR from data target ZREBATE failed
    Request REQU_6412GVIEWBJ0TZZIMZE2TZIOR does not contain any saved update rules; rollback not possible
    Job finished
    I went to the table RSICCONT and checked the mentioned request.  But I couldn't find delete option enabled.  Even our basis team doesn't have authorization to delete the  mentioned request from the standard table RSICCONT.
    Request you to please help me how to handle this.
    Regards,
    Antony Jerald.

    Hi Antony,
    Once you have deleted the data in PSA there is no way to reconstruct the request hence you can do below things to correct it
    1) Identify the No of Records which having error , because if you have more records it will take more time as in debug mode we have option to edit only one record at one.
    2) Display only one record in Active table and change it using the Debug option ( not recommended ), but as you are in corner we need to use this
    3) change the records with respective values and active the request again
    Regards
    Jagan

  • RECON A/C DOES NOT CONTAIN PROFIT CENTER Error

    I am posting the doc in *'R3*' Bank receipts-NORTH the entry depiting bank and crediting customer but system giving error this Reconcill G/L A/c does not contain Profit center, But if i posting in RV Billing doc.transfer system accepting I dont know wht is the exact error Plz solve my queries....

    When you are performing traction Customer Receipts against invoice, system takes profit center from invoice line item, i.e for reconciliation line item, and in other line item which is a bank a/c, system defaults it by the rule of inheritance in doc. splitting (if active in your case).
    and if you do not want to clear with any line item and still want to do a receipt then that has to be treated as ' Down Payment '. use special G/L to do such transactions, where you will not face this issue. also, check your document splitting setup and ensure G/L Account classification is correct.
    Regards,
    Sayujya

  • Load ODS - InfoObject: InfoObject does not contain alpa-conforming value

    Hello everybody,
    I get following error while uploading from ODS to InfoObject.
    InfoObject /BIC/ZHOUSENUM does not contain alpa-conforming value 0000000000000000004.
    The data flow is as follows: Transactional InfoSource -> ODS -> InfoObject.
    In the Transfer Rules before ODS I have marked the Conversion check box. The data is populated into ODS without any problems.
    I can even activate the ODS, which reporting enabled.
    When I browse the ODS table with the option check conversion exits unmarked, I can see the value '0000000000000000004'.
    But the upload into InfoObject master data failes
    Any help appreciated.
    TIA
    pawel

    sap_all onboard.
    I assume, this infosource is locked, due to the fact it was system generated.
    On the other hand, there is a s-note 559763 which says:
    If an InfoObject is filled with ALPHA exits from an R/3 System, the BW assumes that the data is to arrive in the internal ALPHA format and therefore does not convert the data.
    I know, it is about R/3 as source system, but I assume the same would be for BW.
    p.

  • Infopack Error ( does not contain alpha conforming value 10)

    When I try to run my infopack which pulla data from BW into APO, the data load fails with the error below:
    "InfoObject /BIC/XXXX does not contain alpa-conforming value 10"  when I click on the details icon, I get the following description.
    Can somebody please throw some light on this as I am new to DP/BW. Appreciate your help if someone can help me with fixing this problem.
                                                                                    Diagnosis                                                                               
    The system checked whether the loaded InfoObject value conforms to the   
         conversion exit.The check failed.                                                                               
    For example:                                                                               
    The value '1' was loaded into an InfoObject with alpha exit, even though 
         the value '0000000001' was expected.                                                                               
    System response                                                                               
    The load process has failed or the erroneous records are displayed in    
         the monitor. This does not depend on how error handling is set up.                                                                               
    Procedure                                                                               
    Find out why the data does not conform to the conversion exit, and, if  
         possible, correct the cause. Possible causes are errors in Business     
         Content or an error in a customer exit in the source system.                                                                               
    If you cannot correct the problem, you have the option of removing the  
         conversion exit on the InfoObject. However, since the system has already
         been converted, duplicates appear in the system again.                  
    Thanks
    Varun

    Hello Varun,
    BW expects your Key Figures to be stored in "alpha conforming format". This is can be roughly described as having 0s in front. For example, if your key figure value is 10, then the alpha conforming value of that is 000000000000000010 (assuming the number of chars in your KF is 18).
    To correct the error do the following:
    In your transfer rule in BW for InfoObject /BIC/XXXX, implement an ABAP routine that calls function module CONVERSION_EXIT_ALPHA_INPUT. Here an example of the ABAP code you should put in your transfer rule for /BIC/XXXX:
    CALL FUNCTION 'CONVERSION_EXIT_ALPHA_INPUT'
      EXPORTING
        input         = TRAN_STRUCTURE-/bic/xxxx
    IMPORTING
       OUTPUT        = RESULT.
    Hope this helps. Please post again if you have questions.

  • Error: InfoObject does not contain alpha-conforming value 20030729

    Hi everyone,
    I got this problem, that i tried to fix yesterday, but all i did was that i got realy frustrated...
    I created an infoobject which is copy of 0DOC_NUMBER and has alpha coversion routine.
    Mapping field in DataSource is also type character 10(VBELN) as my infoobject.
    But there are some values in this field that i am trying to load, less then 10 characters long (20030729,20051116...) and shouldn't be there, because the values are dates and not document numbers.
    But anyway on R/3 side this values are in field which is defined as character 10 (VBELN), and when I am trying to load Infopackage(17500 records) I get 52 errors: InfoObject does not contain alpha-conforming value 20030729.
    I don't get it, since both fields are type character 10 and the values are only digits, why do I get this error message and how can I fix it?
    PS:One solution is to remove alpha conversion routine from infoobject, but i don't want that.
    Regards,
    Uroš

    hi,
    sorry... correction, it's 'Exclusive attributes' that cannot be used for navigational attribute, you can set lower case to differentiate ... check the impact of lower case setting here ...
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_bw33/helpdata/en/b7/f470375fbf307ee10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
    Lowercase letters allowed / not allowed
    If this indicator is set, the system differentiates between lowercase letters and capital letters when you use a screen template to input values. If this indicator is not set, the system converts all the letters into capital letters when you use a screen template to input values.
    If you choose to allow the use of lowercase letters, you must be aware of what happens when you input variables:
    If you want to use the characteristic in variables, the system is only able to find the values for the characteristic if the lowercase letters and the capital letters are typed in accurately on the input screen for variables. If, on the other hand, you do not allow the use of lowercase letters, any characters that you type onto the input screen, are converted automatically into capital letters.
    Exclusive attributes:
    If you select Exclusively Attributes, the created characteristic can be used only as a display attribute for another characteristic, and not as a dedicated characteristic in the InfoCube. Furthermore, you then cannot transfer the characteristic into InfoCubes. However, you can use it in ODS objects or InfoSets.

  • Error (Data mining): The specified mining structure does not contain a valid model for the current task.

    I'm trying to run the Cross validation report on a mining structure that contains just Microsoft Association Rules mining model. In Target Attribute, I've tried:
    Actual(Service Description).SE value
    Actual([Service Description]).[SE value]
    Actual(Service Description)
    Actual([Service Description])
    just because i don't know what is the exact correct format, but none of them worked, and I always get the following error:
    Error (Data mining): The specified mining structure does not contain a valid model for the current task.
    the following is my mining model structure

    Association rules does not allow for cross-validation
    Mark Tabladillo PhD (MVP, SAS Expert; MCT, MCITP, MCAD .NET) http://www.marktab.net

  • Error msg, "Maximum selection does not contain value 9999999999.

    Hi, I am getting this error wile doing Reclassification of HFM Movement.
    Error msg, "Maximum selection does not contain value 9999999999 of subassignment HFM CD2 & Asset Type "                                         
    in the Data Monitor, ( in Reclass Net Reserve). While running BCF task for a company for period 16/2009     
    Actually, We have converted the consolidation area from XX(2009) to YY(2010).
    Before this task, user has performed the balance carry forward.
    My Analysis is as follows:-
    Method Used in this Reclassification                                         
    RECYX (Reclassify HFM Movement at YE lvl 10)                                        
         TRIGGER                                   
         Items : 100-299, 9900-9999                                   
         HFM Movement Type : O200 to O300                                   
         Posting Level : 10                                   
         TARGET                                   
         Items : 100-299, 9900-9999                                   
         Move : O100C                                   
         Posting Level : 10                                   
         HFM CD2 and Asset type : Ticked                                    
    After TEST run in UCMON, the error message comes :-                                        
    The "HFM CD2 & Asset Type value 9999999999" is not maintained in Breakdown Categories Y500, Y700  etc.                                        
    Breakdown categories in Workbench                                        
    Maintained as "OPTIONAL, Initialized value allowed".                                        
    Single Selection                                         
    1A                                        
    1B                                        
    AR                                        
    GA                                        
    Default Selection                                        
    99999999999                                        
    BCS CUBE                                         
    HFM CD2 & Asset Type - coming blank               
    LOTR                                        
    HFM CD2 & Asset Type - Coming blank     
    Please help to go forward.
    In Anticipation,
    Deepankar Jain

    Thanks a lot Dan for the reply.
    Yes, the single selection is 1A, 1B etc, I agree that including this default value 9999999999 in single selection will resolve this issue, but the BREAK DOWN TYPE is OPTIONAL, that means It will also consider a blank value, right?
    Also, In the method defined for RECLASSIFICATION in workbench, in the TARGET parameters, the" HFM CD2 and Asset Type"  is blank but the "DEFAULT is TICKED" which makes it a mandatory derivation rule.
    Please correct me if I am wrong.
    Your replies on it are highly appreciated.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Deepankar

  • MIGO error 'Purchase Order does not contain a confirmation control key'

    Hi,
    while posting GR to a PO i am getting an error ' Purchase order XXXXXXXXX does not contain a confirmation control key'
    it is true that i have not defined any confirmation control key in PO, Aknowled rerd checkbox is also not ticked
    Still why this message coming, what setting would be bringing this message
    Please clarity

    Hi,
    Until the installation of Note 589422 (with SP SAPKH46C43) you could  due to a program error - create a delivery even though the purchase order did not contain any confirmation control key.                                                                               
    This is now prevented through error message M7394. The transfer of this check (Confirmation control key existing in the purchase order, see Note 589422) was necessary as otherwise you could post a purchase order as desired. (Refer to also Note 616944 -> SAPKH46C44)
    589422 Several inbound deliveries can be created with MIGO :                                                                               
    "Implement the program correction.                                       
    With Transaction SE91 create message M7394 with the message text:        
    Purchase order & & does not contain a confirmation control key".         
    After you implemented this correction, when you want to create an        
    inbound delivery with Transaction MB01 or MIGO or with                   
    BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE and if the purchase order does not contain a        
    confirmation control key the system displays error message M7394         
    "Purchase order & & does not contain a confirmation control key".                                                                               
    Hope this can explain the error you met.
    Regards,
    Mauro

  • Reader &Acrobat CAB for SCUP does not contain update info

    The Adobe Reader and Acrobat CAB files for use with SCUP, Patch Manager and WSUS does not contain any pre-requisite information.  It also removes pre-requisite information from Adobe updates that have already been published to a WSUS server - thus halting all Adobe Reader and Acrobat updates.  When is the CAB file going to be updated ?

    The applicability rule is seen in the XML format as below,
    <sdp:InstallableItem ID="de22ec71-8315-42b7-b4e5-f87270f80216"> 
    - <sdp:ApplicabilityRules>
    - <sdp:IsInstalled>
    <msiar:MsiPatchInstalled />
    </sdp:IsInstalled>
    - <sdp:IsSuperseded>
    <msiar:MsiPatchSuperseded />
    </sdp:IsSuperseded>
    - <sdp:IsInstallable>
    <msiar:MsiPatchInstallable />
    </sdp:IsInstallable>
    - <sdp:Metadata>
    - <msiar:MsiPatchMetadata>
    - <MsiPatch xmlns="http://www.microsoft.com/msi/patch_applicability.xsd" SchemaVersion="1.0.0.0" PatchGUID="{AC76BA86-A440-FFFF-A440-7A8C40011003}" MinMsiVersion="4" TargetsRTM="true">
    - <TargetProduct MinMsiVersion="300">
    <TargetProductCode Validate="true">{AC76BA86-1033-FFFF-BA7E-000000000006}</TargetProductCode>
    <TargetVersion Validate="true" ComparisonType="Equal" ComparisonFilter="MajorMinorUpdate">11.0.00</TargetVersion>
    <UpdatedVersion>11.0.03</UpdatedVersion>
    <TargetLanguage Validate="false">0</TargetLanguage>
    <UpdatedLanguages>1058</UpdatedLanguages>
    <UpgradeCode Validate="true">{AC76BA86-0000-0000-BA7E-7E8A45000000}</UpgradeCode>
    </TargetProduct>
    - <TargetProduct MinMsiVersion="300">
    <TargetProductCode Validate="true">{AC76BA86-1033-FFFF-7760-000000000006}</TargetProductCode>
    <TargetVersion Validate="true" ComparisonType="Equal" ComparisonFilter="MajorMinorUpdate">11.0.00</TargetVersion>
    <UpdatedVersion>11.0.03</UpdatedVersion>
    <TargetLanguage Validate="false">0</TargetLanguage>
    <UpdatedLanguages>1058</UpdatedLanguages>
    <UpgradeCode Validate="true">{AC76BA86-0000-0000-7760-7E8A45000000}</UpgradeCode>
    </TargetProduct>
    <TargetProductCode>{AC76BA86-1033-FFFF-BA7E-000000000006}</TargetProductCode>
    <TargetProductCode>{AC76BA86-1033-FFFF-7760-000000000006}</TargetProductCode>
    <ObsoletedPatch>{AC76BA86-A440-FFFF-A440-7A8C40011001}</ObsoletedPatch>
    <ObsoletedPatch>{AC76BA86-A440-FFFF-A440-7A8C40011002}</ObsoletedPatch>
    - <SequenceData>
    <PatchFamily>AC76BA861033FFFFBA7E000000000006</PatchFamily>
    <Sequence>11.00000.03000.10000</Sequence>
    <Attributes>1</Attributes>
    </SequenceData>
    - <SequenceData>
    <PatchFamily>AC76BA861033FFFF7760000000000006</PatchFamily>
    <Sequence>11.00000.03000.10000</Sequence>
    <Attributes>1</Attributes>
    </SequenceData>
    </MsiPatch>
    </msiar:MsiPatchMetadata>
    </sdp:Metadata>
    </sdp:ApplicabilityRules>
    <sdp:InstallProperties CanRequestUserInput="false" RequiresNetworkConnectivity="false" Impact="Normal" RebootBehavior="CanRequestReboot" />
    - <msp:MspInstallerData FullFilePatchCode="{ac76ba86-a440-ffff-a440-7a8c40011003}">
    <msp:MspFileName>AcrobatUpd11003.msp</msp:MspFileName>
    </msp:MspInstallerData>
    <sdp:OriginFile FileName="AcrobatUpd11003.msp" OriginUri="http://armdl.adobe.com/pub/adobe/acrobat/win/11.x/11.0.03/misc/AcrobatUpd11003.msp" Digest="NW3lgIGvJ90NX6tUWYP0em8G2wk=" Size="121290752" Modified="2013-05-11T12:23:59Z" />
    </sdp:InstallableItem>

  • Database schema SCM does not contain the associated database objects

    I am getting the following error when i am trying to migrate the form to apex using application migration.
    "*Database schema SCM does not contain the associated database objects for the project, aafs.*
    *Ensure the database schema associated with the project contains the database objects associated with the uploaded Forms Module .XML file(s).* ".
    Actully i am having one schema which i named as SCM, and i have defined one table TT.
    I created one form test.fmb in which i used TT table.its compiled successfully.
    Then i generated the xml file using frmf2xml from fmb file. After that, I created the project in appication migration wizard in SCM schema.
    Project creattion is working fine.but when i m trying to create application,it is showing me above error.
    can any one help in solving this problem.

    Hi Hilary,
    Thanks for your response/feedback.
    1. The schema associated with the project does not contain the necessary objects Can you please verify that the schema associated with your Forms conversion project does in fact contain the objects associated with the uploaded files. Could you also verify that the object names referenced in the error message do not exist within the schema associated with your workspace. Ensure that the schema associated with the project contains the necessary database objects before proceeding to the generation phase of the conversion process.
    Ans:
    Yes it does contain the objects (See results from SQL query Commands below):
    SELECT MWRA_CONTRACT_NO, OLD_CONTRACT_NO FROM PROJECTS@CONTRACT_LX19.MWRA.NET
    ORDER BY MWRA_CONTRACT_NO
    000000569 551TA
    000000570 553TA
    000000575 560TA
    000000576 561TA
    000107888 502TA
    000108498 500TA
    000108502 503TA
    2. The block being converted contains buttons, which may have been incorrectly identified as database columns, and included in the original or enhanced query associated with your block This is a known issue ,bug 9827853, and a fix will be available in our upcoming 4.0.1 patch release. Some possible solutions to this issue are:
    -> delete the buttons before generating the XML
    -> delete the button tags from the XML
    -> add "DatabaseItem=No" for the button in the XML file before importing it in Apex.The button is excluded when creating the Application.
    Ans
    yes it does contain push buttons to transfer to another forms and these are defined as Non data base items. Parial XML code provided below:
    - <Item Name="REPORTS" FontSize="900" DirtyInfo="true" Height="188" XPosition="4409" FontName="Fixedsys" ForegroundColor="black" DatabaseItem="false" Width="948" CompressionQuality="None" YPosition="3709" FontSpacing="Normal" Label="REPORTS" BackColor="canvas" FillPattern="transparent" ShowHorizontalScrollbar="false" FontWeight="Medium" ShowVerticalScrollbar="false" FontStyle="Plain" ItemType="Push Button">
    <Trigger Name="WHEN-BUTTON-PRESSED" TriggerText="GO_BLOCK('REPORT_1');" />
    </Item>
    - <Item Name="TRACKHDR" FontSize="900" DirtyInfo="true" Height="188" XPosition="3409" FontName="Fixedsys" ForegroundColor="black" DatabaseItem="false" Width="948" CompressionQuality="None" YPosition="3709" FontSpacing="Normal" Label="TRACK" BackColor="canvas" FillPattern="transparent" ShowHorizontalScrollbar="false" FontWeight="Medium" ShowVerticalScrollbar="false" FontStyle="Plain" ItemType="Push Button">
    <Trigger Name="WHEN-BUTTON-PRESSED" TriggerText="GO_BLOCK('TRACKHDRS');" />
    </Item>
    - <Item Name="SUBAWRD" FontSize="900" DirtyInfo="true" Height="188" XPosition="2429" FontName="Fixedsys" ForegroundColor="black" DatabaseItem="false" Width="948" CompressionQuality="None" YPosition="3719" FontSpacing="Normal" Label="SUBAWARDS" BackColor="canvas" FillPattern="transparent" ShowHorizontalScrollbar="false" FontWeight="Medium" ShowVerticalScrollbar="false" FontStyle="Plain" ItemType="Push Button">
    3. If you are still experiencing issues, then please create a testcase on apex.oracle.com and update this thread with the workspace details so I can take a look.
    Test case details are given below. It was created per ORACLE for open Service Request Number 3-1938902931 on ORACLE Metalink.
    Workspace: contract4
    username: [email protected] (my email)
    Password: contract4
    Comments:
    For my migration/testing purpose a dabatase link and synonyms have been setup by our ORACLE DBA. Could this be causing this problem?
    Do we know when the fix 4.0.1 patch release will be available?
    Thanks for your help.
    Indra

  • The RFUMSV50 program does not generate transfer lines of deferred VAT

    Hello;
    The RFUMSV50 program does not generate transfer lines of deferred VAT ,
    The context is the following one:
    Code VAT Created with code target VAT, general account of VAT also created,
    Rule of deferred VAT created and activated for the company code in question, with marks to compensate for check.
    The data of tests are the following ones:
    Creation of an invoice via the FB60,
    Integral payment of the invoice via F-53,
    Creation of the confirmation of the operation in bank via the manual statement FF67,
    Clearing of the intermediate banking account  with the bank account  via F-03.
    After all these elements, by executing the RFUMSV50 program, I have nothing in result.
    There somebody who had the same problem, could help us?
    Thank you.

    Hi
    Service Tax credit cannot be utilized unless the Vendor Invoice is Paid. This is the reason till the payment is done the service tax Amount will be accumulated in deferred tax account and once the invoice is paid the balance in deferred tax is need to be transferred  to respective Service Tax , Educational Cess and higher Education Cess account. There can be various business scenarios for full and Partial Payment to facilitates the transfer of such deferred balance to respective account SAP has come up with some new standard program RFUMSV50 instead of RFUMSV25. To overcome the limitation of this program i.e. not able to take care of more than one tax line item, below the solution is provided with scenarios “Full Payment is made to Vendor Invoice”. 
    hope this is help ful
    thanks
    Trinath

  • Document does not contain selectable items.

    Hello Gurus,
    My purchase team wanted to transfer plant from one plant to other.. and so they are creating STO , without any confirmation , while doing GRN 101 movement type Store person is facing error Document does not contain selectable items.
    Please help to resolve the same.

    Hi,
    1) this should be posted in MM forum, not here
    2) let the person go to MIGO , to menu Settings, click Default Values and check checkbox "Propose All Items"
    3) I guess if it is STO it would need goods issue first happening in source plant so that GR can happen in receiving plant (so first create Outbound Delivery in source plant, post goods issue against it and then do the GR with 101 against this delivery or PO itself)
    Regards,
    Tomek

  • Playlist that does not contain artist of another playlist

    Hello,
    How could you create a playlist that does not contain artist/album present in another playlist?
    I do not even know if it is possible : in that case, do you have any alternatives?
    Thank you very much for your answers.
    Regards,

    Match all rules...
    Playlist is Music
    Playlist is not Playlist 1.
    Playlist is Playlist 2
    or just...
    Match all rules;
    Playlist is Music
    Playlist is not Playlist1 (iPhone playlist)
    I want that playlist to not contain artist/album from playlist (2).
    Do you really want to match Artist/Album or do you simply want to show everything that is not in Playlist 2?

Maybe you are looking for