RTL 8188CE poor speed with fluctuations on Wind box DC111

Hi everyone,
I have a problem with speed with my WIFI adapter ( RTL 8188CE in AzureWare AW-NE139H ). I think that the problems may be in the drivers.
The "Local Area Connection Status" report speed between 90 and 120 Mbps but when I start copy files from another pc connected to router via LAN the transfer speed is less than 300Kb. When I place the router to 1 meter from my Wind Box the transfer speed is less than 4Mbps and have a lot of fluctuations. My router is TP-Link WR843ND and I haven't any problems with it when I use my laptop or mobile devices. I try the drivers from MSi site, from Realtek's site and from azure ware. I use Windows 7 64bit. When I test it on Windows 8.1 64bit the problem was worst - the speed was less than 100Kb.
Does someone have any idea how to solve the problem. I Googled a lot but without luck.
My system is: Wind Box DC111( RTL 8188CE in AzureWare AW-NE139H ), Windows 7 64 bit, router TP-Link WR843ND

You can try the Realtek driver if you think it's driver related: http://www.realtek.com.tw/downloads/downloadsView.aspx?Langid=1&PNid=21&PFid=48&Level=5&Conn=4&DownTypeID=3&GetDown=false&Downloads=true
Hope it helps.

Similar Messages

Poor speed and fluctuation performance

Hi just got infinity 2 installed on 02/09/14 and experiancing poor speeds. getting on average 20Mb Dl and 12UL. I am 100meters from the exchange box, with new wiring to house and throughout. my profile is (see below) tried restarting router disconnecting everything etc but to no avail, is it possible that my profile needs to be reset. Any help would be greatly recieved. My neighbour is getting 78Mb Dl
Thanks
Gregg
Telephone Number 019468xxxxx on Exchange EGREMONT is served by Cabinet 8
Featured ProductsDownstream Line Rate(Mbps)Upstream Line Rate(Mbps)Downstream Range(Mbps)Availability Date High Low High Low
FTTC Range A (Clean)
80
80
20
20
Available
FTTC Range B (Impacted)
80
70.5
20
19
Available
WBC ADSL 2+
Up to 2
1 to 3.5
Available
ADSL Max
Up to 1.5
1 to 2.5
Available
WBC Fixed Rate
0.5
Available
Fixed Rate
0.5
Available
Other Offerings
Fibre Multicast
Available
Copper Multicast
Available

Is this normal from event log??? not .74 is my PC
22:12:09, 22 Sep.
OUT: BLOCK [9] Packet invalid in connection (TCP 192.168.1.74:57872->213.1.72.209:80 on ppp3)
22:12:04, 22 Sep.
BLOCKED 1 more packets (because of Packet invalid in connection)
22:12:02, 22 Sep.
OUT: BLOCK [9] Packet invalid in connection (TCP 192.168.1.74:57889->66.235.139.204:443 on ppp3)
22:11:40, 22 Sep.
BLOCKED 75 more packets (because of Packet invalid in connection)
22:11:38, 22 Sep.
OUT: BLOCK [9] Packet invalid in connection (TCP 192.168.1.74:57854->193.113.4.154:7778 on ppp3)
22:11:36, 22 Sep.
OUT: BLOCK [9] Packet invalid in connection (TCP 192.168.1.74:57856->17.158.10.43:443 on ppp3)
22:10:20, 22 Sep.
OUT: BLOCK [65] First packet is Invalid (TCP 192.168.1.74:57789->193.113.8.193:80 on ppp3)
22:10:18, 22 Sep.
BLOCKED 1 more packets (because of First packet is Invalid)
22:10:16, 22 Sep.
OUT: BLOCK [65] First packet is Invalid (TCP 192.168.1.74:57789->193.113.8.193:80 on ppp3)
22:09:59, 22 Sep.
BLOCKED 1 more packets (because of Packet invalid in connection)
22:09:58, 22 Sep.
OUT: BLOCK [9] Packet invalid in connection (TCP 192.168.1.74:57774->108.160.166.12:443 on ppp3)
22:09:44, 22 Sep.
BLOCKED 175 more packets (because of Packet invalid in connection)
22:09:42, 22 Sep.
OUT: BLOCK [9] Packet invalid in connection (TCP 192.168.1.74:57804->213.1.72.209:80 on ppp3)
22:09:42, 22 Sep.
BLOCKED 73 more packets (because of Packet invalid in connection)
22:09:42, 22 Sep.
OUT: BLOCK [9] Packet invalid in connection (TCP 192.168.1.74:57803->213.1.72.209:80 on ppp3)
22:09:34, 22 Sep.
OUT: BLOCK [9] Packet invalid in connection (TCP 192.168.1.74:57807->17.158.10.43:443 on ppp3)
22:09:30, 22 Sep.
OUT: BLOCK [9] Packet invalid in connection (TCP 192.168.1.74:57760->93.184.220.97:443 on ppp3)
22:09:26, 22 Sep.
BLOCKED 1 more packets (because of Packet invalid in connection)
22:09:24, 22 Sep.
OUT: BLOCK [9] Packet invalid in connection (TCP 192.168.1.74:57753->66.235.139.206:443 on ppp3)
22:08:00, 22 Sep.
BLOCKED 2 more packets (because of Packet invalid in connection)
22:07:59, 22 Sep.
OUT: BLOCK [9] Packet invalid in connection (TCP 192.168.1.74:57732->93.184.220.97:443 on ppp3)
22:07:33, 22 Sep.
OUT: BLOCK [9] Packet invalid in connection (TCP 192.168.1.74:57736->17.158.10.43:443 on ppp3)
22:06:46, 22 Sep.
BLOCKED 16 more packets (because of Packet invalid in connection)
22:06:44, 22 Sep.
OUT: BLOCK [9] Packet invalid in connection (TCP 192.168.1.74:57708->173.222.210.17:80 on ppp3)
22:05:54, 22 Sep.
IN: BLOCK [16] Remote administration (TCP 65.40.56.3:53978->86.153.86.212:80 on ppp3)

Re: poor connectivity and speed with new comcast gateway

Welcome to the wonderfulo world of Comcast. I have been paying for the 50Mb service for over two years. It has never exceeded 23Mb in any speed test, but Comcast wants to charge more if I change to the 25Mb tier. Now we get a notice of up to 75Mb and find that the speed tests show no improvement whatsoever. Conversation with two Comcast installers in the past indicate that in my area we will never see anything above 25Mb. As for the gateway, in two years I have changed the hardware three times and it has made no difference. There is frequent loss of WiFi connection and poor speed whether WiFo or ethernet cable connection is used. Unfortunately, there are few options to address the situation. One is to purchase your own cable compatible modem (Comcast has a list of the ones they say will work) and fight with the company to get the service bill adjusted to reflect the nonuse of their equipment. The other option (short of waiting for Google fiber to go active) is to join the masses that are filing complaints with the FCC, forcing Comcast to address a variety of problems.

anishinabe wrote:
Welcome to the wonderfulo world of Comcast. I have been paying for the 50Mb service for over two years.....
It's not normal to get less than advetised speeds. Generally you should be seeing speeds slightly faster than advertised. Any tech that told you Comcast's sytem was not capable of more than 25MBps was not knowledgable.
Start here: http://forums.xfinity.com/t5/Basic-Internet-Connectivity-And/Connection-Troubleshooting-Tips/m-p/1253575#U1253575

Very slow download speeds with ATT U-Verse

Hello,
Experiencing very slow download speeds with Macbook Pro 2011, on Lion, and ATT UVerse Max, which should allow for an avg. 11-12 MBPS speed. Instead, I get a fluctuating 60-370 kbps speed. I am not experiencing this problem on my Windows machines (Laptop running Windows 7 and Desktop on XP), it is only affecting the Macbook pro. I wonder if this issue is a known problem with ATT U-Verse and Macs, I spent hours yesterday with their support online and they couldn't help me, stating that from their side all settings were OK; the first representative from ATT re-booted the router remotely and that seemed to work for about 10 minutes, and then it went back to a crawling speed...
Any suggestions welcome!
Thanks

Do you have QOS enabled in your router? Did you try plugging the win7 laptop directly and check the speed?

Poor Performance with Fairpoint DSL

I started using Verizon DSL for my internet connection and had no problems. When Fairpoint Communications purchased Verizon (this is in Vermont), they took over the DSL (about May 2009). Since then, I have had very poor performance with all applications as soon as I start a browser. The performance problems occur regardless of the browser - I've tried Firefox (3.5.4), Safari (4.0.3) and Opera (10.0). I've been around and around with Fairpoint for 6 months with no resolution. I have not changed any software or hardware on my Mac during that time, except for updating the browsers and Apple updates to the OS, iTunes, etc. The performance problems continued right through these updates. I've run tests to check my internet speed and get times of 2.76Mbps (download) and 0.58Mbps (upload) which are within the specified limits for the DSL service. My Mac is a 2GHz PowerPC G5 runnning OSX 10.4.11. It has 512MB DDR SDRAM. I use a Westell Model 6100 modem for the DSL provided by Verizon.
Some of the specific problems I see are:
1. very long waits of more than a minute after a click on an item in the menu bar
2. very long waits of more than two minutes after a click on an item on a browser page
3. frequent pinwheels in response to a click on a menu item/browser page item
4. frequent pinwheels if I just move the mouse without a click
5. frequent messages for stopped/unresponsive scripts
6. videos (like YouTube) stop frequently for no reason; after several minutes, I'll get a little audio but no new video; eventually after several more minutes it will get going again (both video and audio)
7. response in non-browser applications is also very slow
8. sometimes will get no response at all to a mouse click
9. trying to run more than one browser at a time will bring the Mac to its knees
10. browser pages frequently take several minutes to load
These are just some of the problems I have.
These problems all go away and everything runs fine as soon as I stop the browser. If I start the browser, they immediately surface again. I've trying clearing the cache, etc with no improvements.
What I would like to do is find a way to determine if the problem is in my Mac or with the Fairpoint service. Since I had no problems with Verizon and have made no changes to my Mac, I really suspect the problem lies with Fairpoint. Can anyone help me out? Thanks.

1) Another thing that you could try it is deleting the preference files for networking. Mac OS will regenerate these files. You would then need to reconfigure your network settings.
The list of files comes from Mac OS X 10.4.
http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=8185915#8185915
http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=10718694#10718694
2) I think it is time to do a clean install of your system.
3) It's either the software or an intermittent hardware problem.
If money isn't an issue, I suggest an external harddrive for re-installing Mac OS.
You need an external Firewire drive to boot a PowerPC Mac computer.
I recommend you do a google search on any external harddrive you are looking at.
I bought a low cost external drive enclosure. When I started having trouble with it, I did a google search and found a lot of complaints about the drive enclosure. I ended up buying a new drive enclosure. On my second go around, I decided to buy a drive enclosure with a good history of working with Macs. The chip set seems to be the key ingredient. The Oxford line of chips seems to be good. I got the Oxford 911.
The latest the hard drive enclosures support the newer serial ata drives. The drive and closure that I list supports only older parallel ata.
Has everything interface:
FireWire 800/400 + USB2, + eSATA 'Quad Interface'
save a little money interface:
FireWire 400 + USB 2.0
This web page lists both external harddrive types. You may need to scroll to the right to see both.
http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/firewire/1394/USB/EliteAL/eSATAFW800_FW400USB
Here is an external hd enclosure.
http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Other%20World%20Computing/MEFW91UAL1K/
Here is what one contributor recommended:
http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=10452917#10452917
Folks in these Mac forums recommend LaCie, OWC or G-Tech.
Here is a list of recommended drives:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=5564509#5564509
FireWire compared to USB. You will find that FireWire 400 is faster than USB 2.0 when used for a external harddrive connection.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UniversalSerial_Bus#USB_compared_toFireWire
http://www23.tomshardware.com/storageexternal.html

Very slow transfer speeds with external hard drives through Firewire and US

Hi All,
My external drives transfer very slowly on my MacPro. I've been searching for answers and have turned up very little. Apple support suggested I post my issue here. Just to make a note, I measured my disk speeds with both AJA System Test and copying files between drives and reading the Disk Activity in Activity Monitor.
I have 3 external drives, all MyBook Premium or Professional, 1x 500GB, 1x 1TB and 2x 1TB in RAID 0. I had them on Firewire 400 and the RAID 0 2TB one on Firewire 800. My transfers on FW were all around 24MB/sec on all drives (much less than what I should be getting with FW400). I then read somewhere that the FW bus on the MacPro uses the slowest speed connected for all FW connections. So I unplugged everything but the FW800 Raid 0 drive and my transfer rate jumped to 40-60MB/sec. This is much better, but still about half or so of what I expect it should be producing from an external RAID 0 setup.
To keep my FW800 backup drive faster, I've plugged the other two into USB2.0. The transfer speeds on both drives are now hideous, around 10-15MB/sec. This is so slow, but I'm not sure what to try to fix my speeds.
The HD's in the external drives are all 7200rpm, and all should be transferring at a higher rate. Do you have any suggestions or ideas? Ideally I'd like to get everything transferring at rates they should be transferring at, but I'll settle with my current FW800 speed of 40-60MB/sec if I can get my other two drives transferring at a non-snail pace.
Is this a common issue? I can't believe I'm the only one plugging multiple external hard drives into their Mac Pro. I hope someone has a fix or solution for this. I'm all ears!
Thanks in advance.

Hi Kappy, thanks for the information.
So I rejigged my setup a tad. My RAID 0 is still FW800, the second drive is back on FW400 on the back port, and the third is USB 2.0 on the back as well.
It's interesting to note that I saw the FW800 taking a bandwidth hit if the FW400 drives was being read/written to. For example, if I was averaging 50-60MB/sec on the FW800 drives and copy something large to the FW400 drive, each drive averages out to about 30/MB second, roughly half the FW800 speed I was getting. The USB while the slowest didn't cause any slowness on the FW drives.
Here are my Xbench results. These results are from each drive being benchmarked individually with no other drives being tested at the same time.
*MyBook 2TB in a RAID 0 configuration: Firewire 800*
Results 75.42
System Info
Xbench Version 1.3
System Version 10.5.5 (9F33)
Physical RAM 16384 MB
Model MacPro3,1
Drive Type WD My Book
Disk Test 75.42
Sequential 80.92
Uncached Write 69.16 42.46 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Write 110.79 62.68 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Uncached Read 53.66 15.70 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Read 136.76 68.73 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Random 70.62
Uncached Write 36.38 3.85 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Write 140.55 45.00 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Uncached Read 93.26 0.66 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Read 88.38 16.40 MB/sec [256K blocks]
*MyBook 1TB on Firewire 400*
Results 47.73
System Info
Xbench Version 1.3
System Version 10.5.5 (9F33)
Physical RAM 16384 MB
Model MacPro3,1
Drive Type WD My Book
Disk Test 47.73
Sequential 52.47
Uncached Write 48.45 29.74 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Write 53.76 30.42 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Uncached Read 43.69 12.79 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Read 70.91 35.64 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Random 43.78
Uncached Write 17.29 1.83 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Write 98.83 31.64 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Uncached Read 76.33 0.54 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Read 97.01 18.00 MB/sec [256K blocks]
*MyBook 500GB on USB 2.0*
Results 40.60
System Info
Xbench Version 1.3
System Version 10.5.5 (9F33)
Physical RAM 16384 MB
Model MacPro3,1
Drive Type WD 5000AA External
Disk Test 40.60
Sequential 35.99
Uncached Write 37.31 22.91 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Write 37.22 21.06 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Uncached Read 26.62 7.79 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Read 50.27 25.27 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Random 46.55
Uncached Write 20.37 2.16 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Write 68.44 21.91 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Uncached Read 93.55 0.66 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Read 86.71 16.09 MB/sec [256K blocks]
So Kappy are you saying that those speeds look normal?
Thanks

Possible to set burn speed with DVD Studio Pro?

Is it possible to set or adjust the burn speed with DVD Studio Pro ver 3..?

Build in DVD Studio Pro, then burn in Toast. Toast will let you adjust the burn speed.

Encoder Speed with NI 9215 module and cDAQ-9172

I've a NI cDAQ-9172 with the NI9215 analog input module, and I want to estimate the speed with an optical encoder (OMRON E6A2-CW3C). My approach was, making a comparison with a point in the midle of the high of the signal, ie 4V, making this way a perfect square signal with 1of high. After that I use the Tone Measurements and the Timing and Transition Measurements modules to calculate the frequency of the wave form, and this way I'm able to calculate the RPM speed.
The problem with this solution, is that even with the engine at a constant speed of 746RPM, measured with a stroboscope, Labview give me a high variable values between 730RPM to 760RPM, and I can't solve this problem because I really need an accurate measurement.
Should I buy for example the NI 9401 module to make this measurement? If so, does any one knows how to build a VI to get the encoder speed?
In attach I send the VI that I'm using to calculate the speed.
Thank you for help.
Attachments:
Encoder Speed.vi ‏112 KB

Hi,
The best way to measure a speed through a quadrature encoder is to use the counters that are inside the cDAQ chassis.
With the 9172 chassis, you need a digital I/O module (9401) in order to access the counters.
With the new generation of chassis (9178), you don't need the 9401 because you can connect your encoder signals to the BNC.
Best regards,
Thomas B. | CLAD
National Instruments France
#adMrkt{text-align: center;font-size:11px; font-weight: bold;} #adMrkt a {text-decoration: none;} #adMrkt a:hover{font-size: 9px;} #adMrkt a span{display: none;} #adMrkt a:hover span{display: block;}
>> Inscrivez-vous gratuitement aux Journées Techniques : de l'acquisition de données au contrôle/com...

Measuring speed with incremental single counter

Hi,
I need to measure the rotational speed and acceleration of a wheel that has 3 hall sensors on it. I will use only 1 of them en it gives 24 pulses 0-5V for a 360° rotation. How can I measure the speed with only a pulse train. I dont have the Quadric encoder...
Now I'd like to measure the rotational speed using a counter of some sort, but the software I tried writing for it isnt working.
Thank you for your help

Hey Nitch,
Concerning the measurements errors:
As you get error when speeding up, it looks like the pulses coming from the hall sensors are to short to get measured by the counter.
Following the USB-6008 specifications, the pulse needs to have a minimum lenght of 100ns (both in high and low state).
As a counter is using edges to count the pulses (for USB-6008 only the falling edge) the edges need to comply with the TTL specifications which means that the rise and fall time of the pulse needs to be within the 50ns range.
So please have a look at the pulse lenght at higher speeds (are they at least 100ns?) and make sure the pulse comply with the TTL specifications.
If not you will have to add some additional electronics to reshape the pulses.
Looking at your program.
It's not nescesarry to have two loops. It's very well possible to have two DAQ tasks within the same look.
Have a look at the Examples which come with LabVIEW --> Exampled Finder --> Hardware Input/Output --> DAQmx --> Synchronization --> Multi-Function.
There are some examples which so the combination of analog and digital input.
Anyhow you will have to remove the right while loop as the DAQ Express VI which apparently gives you the "spanning, stroom, gashendel" values will only start once you have done the counter measurements. I assume that you would like to have the "spanning", "stroom", "gashendel" and"speed" synchronized measured.
Then you have the choice to log to file during acquisition or after the acquisition.
If you would like to log on the fly don't use the express VI's, but use the lower lever "File I/O" functions. These are faster (less processor time usage).
As you VI is written now, the left while loop will only output the lastest counter value measured to the next loop when you click the stop button for example.
You have to "Enable Indexing" of the m/s output tunnel. Right click on the tunnel and you will be able to select "Enable Indexing".
This way the application will automatically create an array and each loop iteration the measured value will be added. One the measurements have been done you can do analysis and save the data using the full array instead of point by point.
Again, also bring your "spanning, stroom and gashendel" inputs to the left loop.
In your right loop you also have a loop counter.
You can simply use the loop iteraction counter (the square box in the left bottom corner with the i). This is also counting from 0 and incrementing by 1 each loop iteration.
Again, you can do this in the left loop and forget the second loop completely.
Hopes this will bring you a step further.
Don't hesitate to post the VI itself. This is always easier to look at than an image.
This way we can also make some modications and post it back.
Best regards,
Joeri
National Instruments
Applications Engineering
http://www.ni.com/ask
Make our forums great:
If you like the answer, don't forget to "Kudos!".
"Accept the Solution" if your question is answered!

HT1689 My podcast app started playing all unplayed episodes at slightly slower speed with everything doubled. How do I return it to normal play?

My podcast app started playing all unplayed episodes at slightly slower speed with everything doubled. How do I return it to normal play?

When you're listening to a podcast, slide the current artwork up from the bottom, and you will reveal the control panel. Adjust the little switch in the middle so that it is pointing North, instead of Northwest. That will fix your problem.

Getting poor results with Refine Edge tool

Not sure if anyone else has run into this issue. But after following numerous tutorials on lynda.com as well as tv.adobe.com and youtube, I just can't get good selection results using the Refine Edge tool in Photoshop CC and I'm convinced it's something I'm doing wrong, but I have no idea what.
After downloading this Wikipedia image of Bismarck for a history documentary, I tried isolating the figure from the background using Refine Edge and keep getting poor results. Maybe it's my settings, I'm just not sure. But after painting over my edges, I end up with terrible results. Unfortunately, I'm getting poor results with other images as well. Can anyone venture to guess what I might be doing wrong? Thanks very much in advance.

Hi ninose11,
For this type of project and idea, I would recommend trying some of the magnetic lasso tool. The tool is located as the third tool in the toolbar (you should see a lasso or rope looking icon), hold down the icon and it should expand - then select the magnetic lasso tool. The magnetic lasso tool will allow you to scroll over the edge of his profile and it will automatically detect the outline edges. The slower you roll-over the shape the higher the accuracy will be. If the magnet is not detecting a particular edge or sharp corner (for example, the ear) you can manually drop points by simply right-clicking at any point during the selection. If the edge is too sharp, you can also create a light feather which will blend the edge softly (this should be located at the top).
If this is unsuccessful still, you can try selecting by color, using the Magnetic Wand Tool (forth icon in the toolbar, again hold down for all options). Once you are using the magnetic wand tool, you should be able to select all the black areas of the background to delete. You can increase or decrease the tolerance to change the sensitivity of the selection.
Hope this helps!

Dear Sir/Madam, Adobe acrobat claims that there is an update. However the update process is very flaky and unreliable. Very poor service, with useless update prompts. System report is attached. Please fix the update, before advertising useless prompts

Dear Sir/Madam,
Adobe acrobat claims that there is an update.
However the update process is very flaky and unreliable.
Very poor service, with useless update prompts.
System report is attached.
Please fix the update, before advertising useless prompts for updates, for paid versions.
Thanks

Nothing is attached.
You should also be aware that there are a number of scams and malwares claiming fake updates.
Please post your report and tell us exactly what product and exact version you have.
And be aware you aren't talking to Adobe.

Trying to burn CD but keep getting error message "The attempt to burn a disc failed. The burn failed because of a medium write error. Tried different speeds with no luck

trying to burn CD but keep getting error message "The attempt to burn a disc failed. The burn failed because of a medium write error. Tried different speeds with no luck

The burn failed because of a medium write error. Tried different speeds with no luck
Then try to use a different brand of DVD or at least a different batch of DVD. The disk may be defective.

Best books to get up to speed with LabView 7?

I am presently looking for advice as to the best book(s) to get up to
speed with LabView 7 (Best beginner's book, best intermediate book,
best advanced book). Any books to advoid? While I prefer hardcopy, I
would be open to the best online resources as well.
Art

I would suggest if you have the opportunity to take the basics 1 and 2 classes offered by NI and select integrators. Otherwise there are books by Bishop and Johnson that will give you a great start with LV. If you need any info on classes please let me know. hope this helps.
BJD1613
Lead Test Tools Development Engineer
Philips Respironics
Certified LV Architect / Instructor

Improve Download Speed with Mobile Wireless Card

I just purchased a GT MAX 3.6 Express LaptopConnect Card from AT&T to allow mobile internet access. While I can connect to the internet, the speed is very slow (I'm getting 3 of 7 bars). I understand there might be a Mac "booster" I can purchase. Has anyone heard of such a thing? Or, do you know how I can improve my download speeds with a wireless card? Thanks kindly for your help on this...

I received M Q today. To my surprise, there is no way to connect M Q to PB or any computer. I called Verizon and talked with their data connect department. They confirmed that M Q cannot be used as a modem The only device that will is Treo 700p. I am returning the unit by FedEx today. Treo is xpensive. So I will downgrade from MBP to PB G4 15" and use Verizon's Broadband Wireless PCMCIA card

RTL 8188CE poor speed with fluctuations on Wind box DC111

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for