RTMFPTurnProxy for peer to peer communication in proxy connection

Which server ip i have to mention in mms.cfg against Rtmfpturnproxy either the fms server ip or the deployment server for peer to peer communication
For peer to peer communication, it is said to add a variable RTMFPTURNProxy in mms.cfg and assign the value the ip address of the turn server. The mms.cfg file is not in the specified location in my windows 7 system. It is mentioned that Flash Player only supports IETF BEHAVE TURN draft 8, not the current TURN RFC. So i create the mms.cfg file with the UTF-8 format in textpad and add the function RTMFPTURNProxy and assign the value of the AMS server ip. Still I could not connect to the server and received NetConnection failed message in proxy internet connection.
My doubt is which ip address the RTMFPTURNProxy should refer. The AMS server or the application deployed server or something the assigned public address. Should I need to do anything regarding the mms.cfg file. What are the conditions I need to check for peer to peer communications in proxy connection? My heartfelt gratitude for any helping mind. Thanks in advance.

The provider system in soamanager must have the same name as in table BBP_BACKEND_DEST field SLD_SYS_NAME (System Landscape Directory Name).

Similar Messages

HTTP Proxy Connection for sharepoint-webservice endpoint in SMP

hi all,
I want to consume share-point services(soap based) through SMP. for that i am creating HTTP Proxy Connection for sharepoint web service endpoint in
SMP. i have done with creation of proxy connection without any error but while testing (on REST_CLIENT add-ons) it showing following error :
Status Code: 400 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <error ><message xml:lang="en">Error occurred while connecting to the Gatewaynull</message> </error>
Can anyone help me....
Thanks in advance.

hii Andrew,
Here are screenshots of proxy connection configuration,
security configuration:
Application creation:
connection white listing :
Error message in Rest Client:
Regards,
SupriyaD

How to correct socket communications error 10054: connection reset by peer

We are running Lookout 5.1 (build 8) reading data through Modbus Ethernet Drivers and we are constantly getting "socket communications error 10054: connection reset by peer" alarms on the server. When I connect to the server file with a client file the client is experiencing communications problems including locking up when editing, trends not showing up, stops updating completely (can only be corrected by restarting server file), and losing symbolic link.
Does anyone know how to stop this alarm from happening and if this could be the cause of my faulty server-client connection or is this strictly a problem between the server and the ethernet radios in the field?
Any response would be appreciated.
Thanks!
Jason
Jason Phillips

DST1,
All I had to do was increase the receive timeout in each driver's properties until the socket errors disappeared. I have them all set to 30000 msec. Communications have been great on this wireless ethernet system ever since.
Sorry for not answering sooner - needed to make time to go back and look at the file and then TS Lee came our way!
Jason Phillips

Bgp no-peer community

Could an expert help me understand bgp NO-PEER community as mentioned in
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac123/ac147/archived_issues/ipj_6-2/bgp_communities.html?

Kashish
It is basically a way to restrict who you advertise routes to. There is an RFC for it, it is quite a short document so it won't take too long to read and it explains it more clearly than i could -
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3765
Jon

How to use the LAN NetStream for peer transmission, please help, write a sample code

How to use the LAN NetStream for peer transmission, please help, write a sample code

No reply, I reply, Oh

Acknowledgement for AsynThird-party-- SOAP-- PI-- ABAP proxy-- ECC scenario

Can someone please provide me a step-by-step for Third-party>SOAP>PI>ABAP proxy>ECC scenario.
Third-part system is sending an Asynchronous HTTPS message to PI which is then routed to the ECC system to do some processing. I have read many blong and all SAP Docu available on this subject, but i am still confused.
I understand that ABAP Proxies supports acknowledgement, but what needs to be done in the third-party system to be able to receive acknowledgements. Is there any special config. that needs to be done in Sender SOAP adapter?
What diff. needs to be done in ABAP proxy to be able to send acknowledgement messages, any config. in XI receiver adapter?
I will appreciate any guidance.
Thanks,
Saurabh

HI
Third party application need to have the synchronus communication enabled. If not then you need to get a wrapper develop for this kind of communication
For proxy development
Just go through these links:
How to create proxy.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/14/555f3c482a7331e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
ABAP Server Proxies (Inbound Proxy)
/people/siva.maranani/blog/2005/04/03/abap-server-proxies
OutBound Proxy (Client Proxy)
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2006/07/28/smarter-approach-for-coding-abap-proxies
Outbound Proxy (Client Proxy)
/people/ravikumar.allampallam/blog/2005/03/14/abap-proxies-in-xiclient-proxy
How to Activate Proxy.
/people/vijaya.kumari2/blog/2006/01/26/how-do-you-activate-abap-proxies
File to R/3 via ABAP Proxy with good example
/people/prateek.shah/blog/2005/06/14/file-to-r3-via-abap-proxy
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/48/d5a1fe5f317a4e8e35801ed2c88246/frameset.htm
Synchronous Proxies:
Outbound Synchronous Proxy
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/profile/abap%2bproxy%2boutbound%2bprogram%2b-%2bpurchase%2border%2bsend
Inbound Synchronous Proxy
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/profile/abap%2bproxy%2binbound%2bprogram%2b-%2bsales%2border%2bcreation

ABAP Proxy connection Between PI and SRM for XMLs

Hello Experts,
We are trying to set up ABAP proxy connection between PI 7.1 and SRM so we can send XML from SRM into PI.
Our SRM developer is getting an SLD error (below) and seems like something is not set up right in the SLD. Could you help me out with any kind of blog/documention on setting up an ABAP proxy connection between PI and an ABAP system. Something that talks about what steps we need to take in PI and SRM.
error ...
*We saw the error during debugging. This error is preventing XML output
to be sent to PI.
BBP_BD 002 An SLD system has not been assigned to logical system
Thanks,
Mayur

Thanks all for a quick reply. I also had to take following step to achieve the task.
adding the XI system to the SRM config - SRM Server -->
Technical basic Settings --> Define System Landscape? (also please
associated documentation in that link for XI)
Thanks,
Mayur

RFC Look Up APIs for a IDOC Receiver Communication Channel

Hi,
Can we use RFC Look Up APIs in UDF for a IDOC Receiver Communication Channel. (File to IDOC Scenario). Requirement is to send a notificaiton when IDOC got posted with IDOC number.
Best Regards,
Madan Agrawal

As the name suggests, RFC lookup uses RFC receiver channel only. In mapping of your File to Idoc scenario, you may perform this lookup.
Requirement is to send a notificaiton when IDOC got posted with IDOC number.
Configure ALEAudit for this requirement. How were you planning to use RFC lookup for such a requirement?
Regards,
Prateek

How to configure XI and BI for proxy connection?

Hi BI guruz!
I am trying to set up a proxy connection between SAP BI (Vr7.0 SPS 09) and SAP XI (3.0 SPS 19). for this i am planning to follow the How to document (How to Integrate XI and BI in SAP NetWeaver 2004s.pdf) as given by SAP.
I am new to the aspect of proxy connections... hence i am stuck at the very first step.
In the pre-requisite section of the doc says
1. The BW is integrated to the XI landscape
2. Create a software component in the Software Landscape Directory.
Can any one please tell me the steps for doing this, the tcodes and all , and how to check for the connections?
Looking forward to hearing from you, as I read a lot of matter from SDN forums and help.sap.com sites, but cudnt figure out what all i have to for this...
Thanks,
Sush

Hi Sush,
there is a how-to guide on this topic, did you check it out?
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/40574601-ec97-2910-3cba-a0fdc10f4dce
Hope it is helpful for you!
Regards,
Sally

9 inch iPad for the iPad artists community

News about the iPad mini sounds good. But as an iPad artist, the mini might spell the end of a rich pool of iPad artists who favoured the bigger iPad screen for sketches.
I hope apple will continue to make and improve the 9 inch iPad for the iPad artist community.

Hey Budbudbud-
The iPad Mini came out on October 23, 2012 and yes, it has reduced the 9-inch screen size. The new size is 7.9 inches. But don't worry, the iPad 4 also came out that day, and they continue the 9.7 inch screen size. And if you want screen size for a smaller price, try iPad 2.
-FutureiPad

Sizing for SAP BCM (Business Communication Management)

Hi All
We have to provide a server sizing to be used for SAP BCM (Business Communication Management) module which will be intergrated with SAP CRM and is to be used for call support. As far as we have reached, we require a Windows server and will host MS SQL database with an approx consumer data of 63 lacs consumers.
Please specify the sizing for this server
Thanks in advance
Lokesh

Sorry, forgot to ask how much physical memory you have on each host.
Let's split it to 2 topics.
1. For ECC, since OracleDB and non-unicode page which are the 2 major factors won't be changed, so I would think here we could just do a math, as long as host A has enough memory which is allocated for Oracle and ECC (extended memory) on host B to be added up.
2. For EP, memory tuning size is basically the same for HP JDK and SUN JDK, that each server node is allocated approximately 2.5GB RAM. Besides, 0.8-1GB RAM needs to be left for OS kernel. But in your case, host B is currently holding 200 users which is a big jump for host A(note: only active user quantity matters here).
That's fine if main physical memory is a little short for host A, utilizing multiple less powerful servers as 2nd tier application server to do the load balancing is also a solution with lower TCO.
Regards,
Effan

ACE - TCP Options for Proxy-Connections

Hi all,
I have the issue that my ACE does not seem to allow tcp options with L7 proxied connections to the servers. For the client side connection I see the TCP option timestamp for example, but unfortunately the ACE itself does not put the timestamp option into its own TCP connection to the rserver. A 'parameter-map type connection' does only seem to have an effect on L4 connections, not proxied ones. Does anybody know a way how to tell the ACE to have e.g. a timestamp option in the TCP connection to the server as part of a L7 loadbalancing?
Any help is highly appreciated!
Thanks,
Daniel

Daniel,
we do not support timestamp at L7.
I think we only support window scaling.
Gilles.

Disabling Firefox 9 Proxy Connection settings using GPO (in Server 2008)

I am planning to disable Proxy Server settings in the connection settings in the Firefox options. I downloaded "firefoxdefaults & firefoxlock". Made these changes in the GPO (mentioned below)
Computer Settings
1. Delete Private Data cookies
2. Phishing Protection - Enabled.
3. Proxy Settings - Disabled
4. HomePage - Enabled.
5. Extension and Theme Installation - Preference State (Locked) & Allow Addin Installation _ Disallowed.
User Settings
6. Proxy Settings - Disabled.
GPO didnt apply properly. Can you please let me know if there is any other options there to disable proxy settings. Hoping to see your message.

Hi,
We can add the sites to trusted site and clear temp files for test. Detail steps are in the following KB.
even though the steps in this KB is related to XP, we can refer to update the steps to apply to windows 7.
How to troubleshoot problems accessing secure Web pages with Internet Explorer 6 Service Pack 2
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/870700/en-us
If it is not the case, this may be an issue with your proxy setup, if you use a proxy server, try turning it off in your windows network settings.
For more information, please see:
Change proxy server settings in Internet Explorer 9
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-in/windows/change-ie9-proxy-server-settings#1TC=windows-7
For more reasons that can cause webpage load slowly or don’t slow at all, please see:
Webpages load slowly or don't load at all
https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/113910?hl=en
Please note: Since the web site is not hosted by Microsoft, the link may change without notice. Microsoft does not guarantee the accuracy of this information.
Hope this helps,
Ada Liu
TechNet Community Support

Proxy connect test failed

Hello all,
Proxy connect test failed because proxy server answers with 403 - Forbidden for tested domain: www.internic.net.
The check itself was correct as the proxy answers with used user login crendentials but the testing routines itself does not respect that.
Regards
Alex

Hi vshiller,
Could you share us more detailed information about this issue? For example, which kind of test type you were running? How did you run it in your side, local or remote?
>>Failed to initialize client proxy: could not connect to test process vstest.discoveryengine.x86.exe.
If you run your VS as the admin, how about the result?
Like this connect report here:
https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/807771/visual-studio-2013-test-explorer-only-works-if-run-as-administrator
You'd better check that whether it is related to the third party software.
Best Regards,
Jack
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Concurrent Proxy Connections

Does anyone have experience of large numbers of Client connections to a Proxy (say 1000 per machine). None of these connections would be doing very much (they come from a Data Grid) but they would need to stay connected.
I guess the issues are
* Version ( I seem to remember there was some work done on this in 3.6)
* # connections (we have 4000 grid clients + 4 Coherence machines, so 1000 per machine, tho we can run multiple Proxies per machine).
* I know the issue about deserialization being done on the Service thread, hence we might run multiple Proxies per machine.
Any thoughts welcome.
A.

Hi Andrew,
If the client application that will connect to the Coherence cluster is written in Java then you have the option of connect as storage-disabled node. This is what you would likely do for a long-running, web-based application that is collocated with the data grid.
If the application will probably be getting connected and disconnected from the Coherence cluster several times (i.e. many times a day) then even if it's storage disabled it may result in some overhead, as cluster membership information needs to be maintained. This could be aggravated if the client access the cluster across an unreliable, high-latency WAN link. For this kinds of clients, Coherence*Extend allows you to keep cluster membership as stable as possible, and the amount of network traffic caused by repartitioning to a minimum.
If you are using proxy servers, I think the most recommendable approach is to configure Coherence*Extend proxy servers on a dedicated set of machines that serve no other purpose. This will allow you to scale your proxy servers independently from the storage-enabled members of the cluster. It is important to remember, however, that Coherence*Extend proxy servers are full-blown TCMP members, so they should have fast and reliable communication with the rest of the cluster. Ideally, they should be part of the same network switch as the cache servers. I suggest you to take a look at http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E15357_01/coh.360/e15726/gs_best.htm#CIHJIDIA
Regarding serialization, note that if some data travels across the proxy connection, it has to travel in the serialization format configured for the proxy service. If you put data into a cache, it has to travel on the network in the serialization format configured for the cache service of the cache. Period. If this rule is not followed, Coherence wouldn’t know what serialization format any piece of data has.
Hope these thoughts are helpful for you.
Thanks,
Cris

RTMFPTurnProxy for peer to peer communication in proxy connection

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for