Rtorrent: issue with DL large files ( 4GB) to NTFS

Using latest rtorrent/rutorrent: every time I DL a large >4GB file with rtorrent to the NTFS drive it shows it downloading the whole file MB by MB, but when I go to hash check (via rutorrent), there's only a partial percentage DLded. Say if I DL a 4.36 GB .mkv file, I hash check and only 10% is done ~400MB or about 6 minutes of the video.
Oddly:
If I do ls -l --block-size=MB, the file shows normal 4GB+ size.
If I do ls -s, file appears to be only a few hundred MB.
If I DL to my root ext4 drive, there's no issue unless I change the save path of the torrent in rutorrent and elect for the files to be moved to the NTFS drive.
I've transferred large files with 'cp' from another NTFS to this NTFS with no issue.
I thought the problem was rutorrent plugin autotools, but I removed it from my plugins folder and the problem persists.
Permissions:
I have all the relevant directories in /etc/php.ini open_basedir: the user/session, the mounted drive, and /srv/http/rutorrent
I did #chown -R http:http /srv/http/rutorrent
http is a member of the group with NTFS drive access
the rutorrent/tmp directory is changed to be within /srv/http/rutorrent
This is a pesky issue that I didn't have with my last arch install using the same general set up.
I DL to an NTFS formatted drive and mount it the same way I did before: ntfs-3g defaults,auto,uid=XXXX,gid=XXXX,dmask=027,fmask=037
My rtorrent user is the uid (owner) and is in the group that has access to the drive (along with my audio server user and http)
I run rtorrent in screen as the rtorrent user
I imagine this is an issue with rutorrent?
Any tips before I reformat the whole 4TB to ext4?
EDIT: the issue is definitely isolated to rtorrent. I manually added large size torrent using rtorrent, it completed. I then hash checked (in rtorrent) and again only ~10% was shown as complete.
EDIT2: It is most definitely not a permissions issue. Tried this again without mount permissions options and the same thing happens.
Last edited by beerhoof (2015-01-30 22:05:57)

I'm afraid I don't understand the question.
7.2 now correctly parses the Canon XF .CIF sidecar files to determine whether the media is supposed to be spanned or not. This has been a feature request that has been finally addressed to work correctly.
(It also was there in 7.1 & previous, but had limitations: the performance wasn't as good, there had been issues in the past with audio pops at cut points, and it required that the Canon XF folder structure remain intact, ie if you copied the media to a flattened folder structure, it would fail to do the spanning correctly.)
If you are looking for a means to disable the automatic spanning, simply removing the .CIF files will achieve that. Although i'm not sure I understand why you're looking to do that. Most people *want* spanning to happen automatically, otherwise you're forced to manually sync spanned media segments by hand.

Similar Messages

Hello, I am having issues open very large files I created, one being 1,241,776 KB. I have PS 12.1 with 64 bit version. I am not sure if they issues I am having is because of the PS version I have, and whether or not I have to upgrade?

Hello, I am having issues open very large files I created, one being 1,241,776 KB. I have PS 12.1 with 64 bit version. I am not sure if they issues I am having is because of the PS version I have, and whether or not I have to upgrade?

I think more likely, it's a memory / scratch disk issue. 1.25 gigabytes is a very big image file!!
Nancy O.

Issue with length of file paths - Windows & C++ plugin

Hello,
I've got an issue that just popped up on my OCR plugin I've been working on that I suspect is related to the length of the filepath.
I'm getting the following error that is being caught and logged when trying to open a file (filename changed for security purposes):
Error Opening File: D:\aVeryLongFilePath.pdf
Exception info: This file cannot be found.
The entire string, including the D:\ part, is 266 characters long. I cut down the length of part of the path one by one and it was able to open and OCR the document when the length was 259 characters.
I know there's a MAX_PATH variable in Windows and/or there's some kind of limitation for file length. Note that I can open the file in Acrobat using File->Open and run OCR on it individually using the built-in Recognize Text function, but if I try to Recognize Text for Multiple files and choose "Add Folders", the file in question doesn't show up in the list of files to be batch OCR'd (even though it is there). Interestingly, choosing "Add Files" from the Recognize Text->In Multiple Files does work. So Acrobat itself has at least some issues opening the file using some of it's features.
Here's how I'm opening the document:
     string pn;               // assume this is initialized, I'm just putting this here to demonstrate what type it is
     pathName = pn;
     ASAtom pathType = ASAtomFromString("Cstring");
     asPathName = ASFileSysCreatePathName(ASGetDefaultFileSys(), pathType, pn.c_str(), NULL);
     pdDoc = PDDocOpen(asPathName, ASGetDefaultFileSys(), NULL, true);
Is there a way around this problem?
Thanks.

Yes, you are hitting the MAX_PATH on certain versions of Windows.   The only workaround would be to see that the file is "a very long path" and then break up the pathname construction into multiple pieces (perhaps the containing directory and then the file itself). The other option is don't use Cstring to construct, use the Unicode variant.
From: Adobe Forums <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 15:43:33 -0800
To: Leonard Rosenthol <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Issue with length of file paths - Windows & C++ plugin
Issue with length of file paths - Windows & C++ plugin
created by zephed56<http://forums.adobe.com/people/zephed56> in Acrobat SDK - View the full discussion<http://forums.adobe.com/message/4012710#4012710

Recently upgraded to a Canon Mark 3 and now having issues with my RAW files in Bridge and Photoshop. I am operating with CS4. Photoshop produces an error " Could not complete your request because photoshop does not recognize this type of file"

Recently upgraded to a Canon Mark 3 and now having issues with my RAW files in Bridge and Photoshop. I have operating with CS4. Photoshop produces and error " Could not complete your request because photoshop does not recognize this type of file"

Assuming you mean 5D Mark III, Photoshop CS4 cannot directly open raw files from your camera.
Generally speaking, Adobe stopped updating older versions to be able to read raw files from newer cameras when they released a new major version of Photoshop. Photoshop CS4 is no longer receiving Camera Raw updates.
You can double check this yourself:
First you need to determine whether Adobe has released support for your new camera in your version of Photoshop. To do that, look at these two pages. You'll want to find out the earliest version of Camera Raw that can support your camera, then what version of Photoshop can run that version of Camera Raw.
Camera Raw plug-in | Supported cameras
Camera Raw-compatible Adobe applications
If you find your camera is supported by your version of Photoshop, you need to download the latest update for Camera Raw. There's more information on how to do that here:
Keeping Photoshop Up-To-Date
If your version of Photoshop cannot support your camera, you can download and install the latest version of the free Adobe DNG Converter, which can take your raw files as input and put out DNG format files, which your version of Photoshop can open.
Photoshop Help | Digital Negative (DNG)
The DNG converter DOES work, but if you want maximal quality from your raw files (not to mention the convenience and ease of use of directly opening your raw files) you'll want the latest version of Photoshop. Adobe has made substantial improvements in raw conversion quality in recent years.
-Noel

Issue with opening .PDF files after recalling from Symantec Enterprise Vault

Good Morning,
I am having issues with opening PDF files that have been recalled from Symantec Enterprise Vault and some of the files are anywhere from 3-4 years old. Some files open, while others return the error: Adobe Reader could not open filename.pdf because it is not a supported file type or might have been damaged. It is inconsistent as to which files it occurs with. I am not ready to believe that I have that many corrupt files out there. I am opening them on a Windows 7 Enterprise SP1 x64 desktop. Adobe 10.1.7. I have already configured the registry setting for bValidateBytesBeforeHeader that I found in another article to no avail.
The files are on a network share, but I also tried copying them to my local desktop and still received the error.
I have seen other posts regarding this error, but do not see a definitive solution and am hoping that in recent days someone has come up with a solution.
Thank You
Brian Dougherty

Not supported file type can (but not always) mean the PDF was created with an old enough version of Acrobat, that it isn't comaptible with reader X or XI.
Might have been damaged is pretty cut and dried in its meaning and interpretation.
There's a known issue with Mac OS and Safari Browser "breaking" PDFs as they download, but it's not so common for Windows. Since these are files you already had, it would be even less applicable.
You can try downloading an older version of Reader to check if it's a compatibility issue, but you'd have to uninstall the latest to do it and it'd be a lot of bother if they still don't open. It would also mean they are "broken" and cannot be repaired, that I know of.

Anyone having issues with importing CR2 files into lightroom 5 as error message comes up saying "Some import operations were not performed". please advise what is a solution please

Urgent please
anyone having issues with importing CR2 files into lightroom 5 as error message comes up saying "Some import operations were not performed". please advise what is a solution please

Sounds like the folder Write permissions issue described here with a solution:
"Some import operations were not performed" from camera import

Hi people, have on the phone till Apple, the reason i cant download OS X Lion is because BT are having issues with the large download & are working on a fix. Was told to phone back in 24 hours if problem continues

Hi people, have on the phone till Apple, the reason i cant download OS X Lion is because BT are having issues with the large download & are working on a fix. Was told to phone back in 24 hours if problem continues

Hi, just got off the phone from BT Business. It is the Business 2wire hub that has the issue. The girl from technical talked through a direct modem to Mac connection and my download took 20 minutes. If you are on Fibre broadband this is the only current fix or a new router if non fibre customer. Hope that helps.

Numbers 09 is slow dealing with relatively large files

As some of you might know, Excel 2008 is painfully slow when opening relatively large files (about 12000 rows and 28 columns) that have simple 2D x-y charts. FYI, Excel 2004 doesn't have the same problem (and Excel 2003 in the XP world is even better). I purchased iWork09 hoping that Numbers 09 will help, but unfortunately I have the same problem. iWok09 takes more than 5 minutes to open the file - something the older versions of Excel could do in seconds. When the file opens up, it is impossible to manipulate it. I have a MacBook with 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo and 4GB of RAM running OS x (version 10.5.6).
Has anybody else experienced the same problem? If so, is there a bug in iWork09, or is it because it isn't meant to deal with large files.
I appreciate your response.

Numbers '08 was very slow.
Numbers '09 is not so slow but it's not running like old fashioned spreadsheets.
I continue to think that it's a side effect of the use of xml to describe thr document.
We may hope that developers will discover programming tips able to fasten the beast.
Once again, I really don't understand why users may buy an application before testing it with the FREE 30 days demo available from Apple's Web page.
Yvan KOENIG (from FRANCE dimanche 8 mars 2009 13:13:18)

Help with download large file (~50mb) from http protocol

I'm just using the default HttpURLConnection to download a large file from a server, I can never finish downloading before I get this exception:
java.net.SocketException: Connection reset
     at java.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:168)
     at java.io.BufferedInputStream.fill(BufferedInputStream.java:218)
     at java.io.BufferedInputStream.read1(BufferedInputStream.java:258)
     at java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:317)
     at sun.net.www.MeteredStream.read(MeteredStream.java:116)
     at java.io.FilterInputStream.read(FilterInputStream.java:116)
     at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection$HttpInputStream.read(HttpURLConnection.java:2446)
     at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection$HttpInputStream.read(HttpURLConnection.java:2441)
        ...The file is on IIS web server, its a static file, not a server script, web service, or anything special. I usually can download 10-30 mb before this exception occurs. I'm using java 1.6.0_11 on windows xp, anyone have suggestions or experience downloading large files with java?

Thank you everyone for their suggestions. I tried wget, and it worked fine, but I tried a couple of different clients and they were failing too. I assume wget has resume capabilities, so I debugged the server and found the issue. It was a connection problem on the server end.

Multiple issues with Creative Cloud File Syncing

I'm have issues with syncing files on my mac to Adobe Creative Cloud. I don't seem to have issues syncing via drag and drop to my web browser. I keep getting this error while syncing via finder:
I also have a fairly complex PSD with folders that i'm toggling on and off using Layer Comps. I don't see any difference when switching Layer Comps within Extract in the browser. I do see the changes when turning on and off the folders though.. What's the deal with that?
Why does it take so long to render the PSD after I turn on a folder or switch layer comps? It takes about 30 seconds to re-render, which is crippling for our workflow.
This would be an amazing tool for our developers if these 3 issues were resolved.

Thanks for the information.
Could you now send me some log files please..
The log files can be found here:
Mac: /Users/<yourusername>/Library/Application Support/Adobe/CoreSync/
Windows: C:\Users\<yourusername>\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\CoreSync\
The logs have the date in the filename, like "CoreSync-2014-03-25.log". Please compress (zip) all the CoreSync-2014-MM-DD.log files and email them to me directly at [email protected]
Thanks
Warner

User log in issue with Xcelsius SWF file

HI,
I am using the BI as source to BO. Xcelsius dashboard is using webi data by live office.
I have exported the xcelsius in swf file & ppt format.
i am using the credentials user name, password and authentication as SAP.
I have the roles which are created in BI and imported to BO and the roles have users in BI , which came by default to BO.
Now I have created the new users in BI with initial password. I cant login to infoview or swf until i change the initial password in BI and thn with new password i can log in to BO. I understood this concept.
But confusing part is after changing to new password in BI, i can be able to log in to swf or PPT but not fetching latest data from data base.
if i log on first into infoview , thn i can be able to log onto swf file or PPT correctly and access the latest data.
If i directly access the ppt file , i get 'failed to get the document information. lo 26315". But if i login to infoview first then to swf or ppt i wont get any problem.
The problem is, users are access the dashboard file from ppt and pdf. So , is there any work around that, the new user can directly access the data from swf or ppt, without entering the infoview???

Hi sapbi83 ,
May i Know which connection you are using for fetching data into xcelsius, is it LO(Live Office) or Qaaws
if it is Live Office then what is the refresh property set for live office object? and how many live office objects or how many qaaws connection u are using.?
provide the answe of all the above question, i'll be able to help you and Infoview has nothing to do it with the real time data connectivity. the dashboard is completely dependent on the connections used to get data into the xcelsius, if the error is coming in PPT or PDF standalone then there is some issue with the connection used in xcelsius, just let me know the answer of all the above questions.

Hard drive performance issue with DPX & MXF files

Hi everyone,
I spent hours on this forum reading articles about hardware to use for editing large files. I also have to admit, that I made some cut backs due to budge limitations.
I spent most of the money on CPU, motherboard, & ram (6 core 32 gigs , hell of nice MB) ( Video card= gtx 760 2 gig )So ok, I cheaped out on the hard drives. (I think)
I put (2) 7200 rpm drives (raid 0) as my Operating system
(1) External 8TB RAID G drive (USB 3.0 ) as my Media drive. (footage)
(2) 7200 drives (Raid 0) as my Cache Drive
I then opened up an OLD project using canon 5D footage (h264 mov) and some DPX sequence files.
The 5D fooatge played in real time BUT as soon as it ran into the DPX sequence, the frames dropped.
I wanted to cry. I just spent 1,600.00 on parts (&3000.00 pc retail if I bought it instead of building it)
And I got the same performance as my old quad core 6600/ 6 ram system. WHAT GIVES????
So, can someone recommend the cheapest workaround that can get me editing in realtime?
Do you think it's the 3.0 usb connection?
The footage I will be editing will be from the canon c300 (MXF files)
My fear is, if I am dropping frames with DPX file, what's going to happen when I get the MXF files?
Fun Facts:
I tested my OS drives, cache & media,and I was getting 290-301mb/sec READ SPEEDS
Thanks in advance !

Loucann,
I do not have the data on a three drive RAID 0 but here is a two drive RAID 0 with good Seagate ST2000DM001 drives. I have to say "good" because there have been two varieties available, some with two platters and some with three platters. The preferable are with two platters and my experience shows these drive to have an "E" in the third character of the Serial Number like Z1E1ME4V They are slightly faster than the three platter versions. Here is the HD Tune Read of the two better ST2000DM001 drives in RAID 0 on my system.
The best connection is to have all three on a RAIDable Intel SATA III connection but I am doubtfull if this can be accomplished on many motherboards, maybe Eric can comment and enlighten us.
Message was edited by: Bill Gehrke
What motherboard do you have? I guess from the info above it is a socket 2011.

Issue with opening pdf file from web browser

I have Acrobat Pro ver 6 and Adobe Reader 9.1 on a computer. when my user tries to open up a pdf from the web he is getting the following error message:
"The Adobe Acrobat/Reader that is running can not be used to view PDF files in a WEb Browser. Adbe Acrobat/Reader version 8 or 9 is required. Please exit and try again."
What also happens is that Acrobat Pro ver 6 opens up and nothing is there.
I am not sure why he is getting that message since Reader 9.1 is installed.
Can any one shed some light on this for me.
This user needs to have Acrobat and Reader on his system. I understand that there are issues with having both.
Also he has it set up so that any PDF is opening using the Reader 9.1.
Thanks,

Your PC's default reader configuration for embedded PDFs has become confused, due to multiple Adobe PDF document solutions installed on one PC.
Solution 1:
Go to Start > Run
Type regedit and click OK.
Browse to the following key: HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Software\Adobe\Acrobat\Exe
Make sure that the correct Default data value is set for the path where Adobe Reader or Acrobat are installed.
The default installation values are:
"C:\Program Files\Adobe\Reader 9.0\Reader\AcroRd32.exe"
or
"C:\Program Files\adobe\acrobat 6.0\acrobat\Acrobat.exe" (not sure about this path. Check on your PC to be sure)
depending on whether Adobe Reader or Adobe Acrobat is installed.
Solution 2:
Configure the browser to use Acrobat or Adobe Reader as a helper application.
If you are using Firefox to browse the web, you can change this setting in Firefox by going to:
Tools > Options
Click on the "Applications" Tab.
The first item in the list should be "Adobe Acrobat Document". Under the Action list, click the drop down arrow and select the application you want to read PDFs within the web browser. Click OK, and you should be done.
If you're using Internet Explorer to view PDFs, try the below steps.
After you configure Acrobat or Adobe Reader as a helper application, the browser starts the helper application in a separate window and displays PDF files within that window. Acrobat and Adobe Reader both include a preference that lets you specify Acrobat or Adobe Reader as the helper application.
To configure Acrobat or Adobe Reader as a helper application:
Start Acrobat or Adobe Reader.
Choose Edit > Preferences.
Select Internet on the left.
Deselect Display PDF In Browser Using [Acrobat application], and then click OK.
Quit Acrobat or Adobe Reader.
The next time you select a link to a PDF file in the browser, a dialog box asks what you would like to do with the file. If you select Open It, the browser opens the PDF file in Acrobat or Adobe Reader (the helper application); if you select Save It To Disk, the browser saves the PDF file to your hard drive.

Adobe Bridge issue with index.html files

Hi, I have a perplexing problem.... Three weeks ago, I created a web photo gallery in Bridge. I transferred it to my website via FTP and it worked like a charm. Three days later I created another web gallery transferred it to my website using my ftp and the address of what I uploaded takes me to a blank page. I contacted my web hosting support and was told it looks like an issue with my index.html file. Here is a link to the gallery that is working: www.janieblanchard/com/galleries/prettylights/index.html
Here is the link to the site that is not working:
www.janieblanchard.com/galleries/macrogallery/index.html
Any advice would be so helpful, I've spend too many hours trying different galleries and uploading multiple times.
Thanks!

What exact camera make and model?
What specific, exact version of Adobe Camera Raw (ACR) plug-in?
What specific, exact versions of Bridge and of Yosemite?
BOILERPLATE TEXT:
Note that this is boilerplate text.
If you give complete and detailed information about your setup and the issue at hand,
such as your platform (Mac or Win),
exact versions of your OS, of Photoshop (not just "CS6", but something like CS6v.13.0.6) and of Bridge,
your settings in Photoshop > Preference > Performance
the type of file you were working on,
machine specs, such as total installed RAM, scratch file HDs, total available HD space, video card specs, including total VRAM installed,
what troubleshooting steps you have taken so far,
what error message(s) you receive,
if having issues opening raw files also the exact camera make and model that generated them,
if you're having printing issues, indicate the exact make and model of your printer, paper size, image dimensions in pixels (so many pixels wide by so many pixels high). if going through a RIP, specify that too.
etc.,
someone may be able to help you (not necessarily this poster).
a screen shot of your settings or of the image could be very helpful too.
Please read this FAQ for advice on how to ask your questions correctly for quicker and better answers:
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/419981?tstart=0
Thanks!

Issue with opening PDF files from the web Acrobat 8.1.4

Hello everyone
I just found out about this problem today, and it manifests in such a manner that when you try to open a PDF document on the web, it hangs for a while, and then the standard message about Adobe Acrobat not being able to open the document comes up, and after you OK away that you get the message that the program shuts down.
If I download the PDF itself and open it locally it works. Is there any known issue with updates recently that creates this problem?
The system is running on Windows 7 32-bits, and Adobe Acrobat is a part of the CS3 Master Collection.
Greetings from Alexander

Not supported file type can (but not always) mean the PDF was created with an old enough version of Acrobat, that it isn't comaptible with reader X or XI.
Might have been damaged is pretty cut and dried in its meaning and interpretation.
There's a known issue with Mac OS and Safari Browser "breaking" PDFs as they download, but it's not so common for Windows. Since these are files you already had, it would be even less applicable.
You can try downloading an older version of Reader to check if it's a compatibility issue, but you'd have to uninstall the latest to do it and it'd be a lot of bother if they still don't open. It would also mean they are "broken" and cannot be repaired, that I know of.

Rtorrent: issue with DL large files ( 4GB) to NTFS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for