Rule loses condition

Hi,
I have a rule to move mails, which fulfill a certain condition, to a postbox named destinybox. This destinybox is already present and functionable.
This rule works for a couple of days flawlessly. But then it loses the destination box and nothing happens instead.
Has anybody seen this?
Ronald
iMac Core Duo/1,5 GB Mac OS X (10.4.4)

Hi Ronald.
What does “it loses the destination box” mean? Have you tried deleting the rule and setting it up again?
In the Finder, go to ~/Library/Mail/Mailboxes/. Do you see a folder with an .mbox suffix that corresponds to the destination mailbox there?
Note: For those not familiarized with the ~/ notation, it refers to the user’s home folder, i.e. ~/Library is the Library folder within the user’s home folder.

Similar Messages

Regarding rounding rule in condition

hi all,
i am facing an issue related pricing condition,
i have created one condition type- ZROU(round off rule).
this means supoose, i have net price in the PO is 23.60. if i put this condition and i put .40, then total price should be 24. and its comming while creating the Po.
but when iam creating Migo, in accounting document, the price should be taken as 24 but it is taking 23.60. why this condition type effect is not reflecting to MIGO & MIRO.
i need the solution urgently, pls help.
regards,
susanta

Hi,
Create Condition Type "ZROU" as a Positive discount condition. In M/06 keep
Cond. class - A (Discount or surcharge)
Calculat.type - B (Fixed amount)
Use it with Base Price in Pricing
For e.g. In MM Pricing (M/08)
Step 10 - PB00 (Base Price) = 23.60 INR
Step 20 - ZROU (Rounding Value) = 0.40 INR
Step 30 - Net Value = 24.00 INR (From 10 To 30)
If you donot want it as Discount condition then use it as delivery cost condition and mark "Accrual" and do posting to a separate GL. by creating and assigning a new A/c key under Accrual column of Pricing (M/08)
Ans in OBYC > Assign GL as "Rounding Off Difference" for that new A/c Key

Coprying rule-Pricing Condition records

Hi,
When copying the condition records, it gave the message "*Copying is incomplete because no rules have been defined."Can anybody pls. guide as to how to define copying rule for pricing condition.
Regards

Prerequisites for Copying
The following general prerequisites apply to copying condition records:
If the condition tables differ between the source and target condition records, then:
Only one field may differ between the two condition tables
The condition tables must contain the same number of fields
If the condition types differ between the source and target condition records, then each condition type must have the same calculation rule, scale type, condition class, and plus/minus indicator.
Copying Rules
Copying rules determine which condition types and condition tables you can use for copying between source and target condition records. The rules are defined in Customizing for Sales and must meet the prerequisites listed above. The standard R/3 System contains standard copying rules. If required, your system administrator can modify the standard copying rules or add new ones to meet your requirements. During processing, you can select from alternative copying rules, depending on what you are trying to copy.
Examples of Different Copying Scenarios
The following three scenarios describe how you can copy condition records.
Scenario 1: Same condition types/same condition tables
You offer a special discount to a particular price group (a group of customers defined in the customer master record). You want to make this discount available to other price groups by copying pricing details from the existing record. In this type of copying, the condition types (K020) and the condition tables (table 20) are identical for both source and target condition records. The only thing that varies in this case is the value of one of the key fields (the Price group field).
Scenario 2: Same condition types/different condition tables
The access sequences for a particular condition type can be defined in Customizing for Sales so that it accesses more than one condition table. This means condition records with the same condition type can have different keys. You can also copy condition records where the condition type is the same but the condition tables are different. Say you offer a material-specific discount to a particular price group (condition type K032, condition table 32). You can copy this material discount and create a new condition record for a specific customer (condition type K032, condition table 5).
Scenario 3: Different condition types/different condition tables
You can also copy condition records even when both condition types and condition tables are different. Say you offer a special discount to a particular price group (condition type K020, condition table 20) as you did in the first scenario. Here, however, you want to copy this condition record not to another price group but to a new customer-specific discount (condition type K007, condition table 7). In this case, both condition types and condition tables are different.
Copying Process
You can call up the copy function from the Edit menu in any of the following condition record screens:
Creating
Creating with reference
Changing
Overview
There are several typical scenarios for using the copying function. You may want to copy an existing condition record into a number of new condition records. In this case, you use the change condition record function. Alternatively, you may want to create a new condition record and copy it to other records all in one step. In this case, you use the create condition record function. In both cases, you can change the copied data before you save the new condition records.
Note:
If the existing rules not suited to ur requirment , u have to contact Abapers to write the routines for ur requirement.
Hope it is useful
REWARD POINTS IF USEFUL...

Rule activation condition

Hi All,
i need a lil help in this,
what i am trying to do is trigger a global rule that show ACL fields based on this type of condition
#active.dSecurityGroup like "%_Restricted"
where my security group that has ACL are having naming convention <Department Name>_Restricted.
thanks
-somesh

This is not a task for rules at all.
See http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23943_01/doc.1111/e10792/c05_security.htm#CSMSP2433
You may setup the variable SpecialAuthGroups to contain all your security groups (you'll need to do it anyway to have the fields active).

Rule Modeler condition of marketing attribute

Hi experts,
I need to create a Rule Modeler to trigger an Alert.
Does it possible to add the condition to check on BP's marketing attribute?
For ex:
If confirmed BP has marketing attribute to accept newsletter, I would like to trigger an alert to remind the agent.
Currently I did not see the rule modeler has such condition, is it not feasible?
cheers,
ginnie

Hello Ginnie,
You are correct that there is no out of the box attribute (condition) for BP Marketing Attributes. However, this is something that several customers have done on a project basis. You need to create an ABAP class that retrieves the values of the desired marketing attributes for the confirmed account or contact person. Then you need to map the ABAP class to a new Rule Modeler service. And of course you need to create the attribute itself as well in the Rule Modeler configuration.
Best regards,
John

Business rules data condition

Hi,
I want to write a rules like this: If price in USD is null and (price in RUS is not null and exchange rate is not null) then calculate price in USD from RUS and exchange rate.
How can I test null or not null in Hyperion Planning? Thank you

If(usd==#missing)
Do something;
Else
Do something else;
Endif
Cheers,
Alp

Text Inset in Container File Loses Conditional Tag

Hi,
(Framemaker 8.0p277,unstructured)
I have a number of books that make use of text inset and conditional text. Some text insets contain conditional text in their source. Then, after the inset is put into the container file, the inset may be further conditionalized. This illustrates the situation:
--- Text Inset ---
This inset was created for end users.
When using function X, blah blah blah
-----End Inset----
The red text indicates an InternalDocComment condition. This inset is then placed into the container file where it has another condition applied, PrintOnly for example. PrintOnly is in blue.
The writer is able to set all this up fine. After placing the inset into the container, she selects the inset and applies PrintOnly. The text inset appears in blue and the InternalDocComment as visible shows the maroon of two mixed colors. The writer saves the file, continues working on the files, then later in the week, the writer opens the container file. The blue color indicator is gone from the inset. When the writer selects the inset and chooses Apply Conditional Text, the Conditional Text dialog shows the current selection is Conditional (radio button) but no tags appear in the In portion of the dialog.
I've tried using spacer paragraphs in and around the text inset to see if we can get the conditional tag to "stick" but nothing is working.
Has anyone run into this before?
TIA,
Mary

I use a lot of conditional text and insets but within a structured document. I have noticed that FrameMaker does not always do what one thinks it does. For example, copy a piece of unconditional text and paste it in the middle of conditional text and the pasted text remains unconditional. Each time you open the document, FrameMaker updates the text insets. In your case, it is updating a text inset that is on the whole unconditional. So, my guess is that it bringing it in as unconditional, much like the copy and paste example above. You might test this by creating a small document with the inset and over conditioning, saving it in the mif format, opening the mif file, and looking at how the conditioning is applied. Then save the Frame file, open it, save as mif, and repeat the above. If the containing file conditions DO hold up, then try removing the conditioning within the containing file and reapplying it; this may help to clear out some bad conditioning.
I vaguely recall trying to conditionalize a text inset within the containing document and had problems. I cannot remember what exactly the problems were. My solution was to do the conditioning within the inset file itself. So, if the text inset is always to be conditionalized in the containing document, then do the conditioning within the document itself.

Data Load Rules file - Conditional load

Hi,
I need to create a data load rules file to load sales data. The data comes at product, entity, month, year, version, scenario, account level. I need to load data only towards two of the entities, NCC and NCCCBU, i.e if the product is coming under a particular hierarchy called UK then it needs to get loaded against NCC entity member and if the product is under the CBU hierarchy it needs to be loaded against the NCCCBU entity.
All of the data comes in the same file so I need to load it in one go without splitting the file into two.
Thanks
Vikash

You can achieve this.
In the data load rule when you are mapping the entity column.
set the propperties like this:
Field properties -> Global Prpoperties
Replace with
UK NCC
CBU NCCCBU
Field properties -> Data Load Prpoperties
Map the column with entity dimension.

Copying rules for conditions do not contain V 1 090 2 entry

I am getting the above error while i copy price from pricing agreement in to service contract line item..
Am i doing something wrong?There are two pricing procedures mentioned in VOV8 in the contracts section for Service contracts PABR01 & PABR02. What is the actual purpose of the condition types underlying these procedures.How can we effectively using these procedures and what role do they play when i copy pricing to the release orders ?

Can you indicate the error message number ??
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Rule firing conditional on task completion

I'm looking to prevent changes to a set of fields once a task is completed.
I can creat a rule to force it to be read-only when it's not empty, or when the service delivery moment is complete, but both solution have negative consequences. The former prevents the service provider from working on the case, saving the form, then going back to it and correcting a typo. The latter solution allows a service provider to go back into that task and change a field later on in the server delivery.
Suggestions are welcome. Thanks.

Can you use the Access Control on the AFC to make all those fields viewable only once complete?

Update Collection by Query rule and condition

Hi,
I have one collection called Windows 7 Machines.
I've added a Query that I made like this:
select SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceID,SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceType,SMS_R_SYSTEM.Name,SMS_R_SYSTEM.SMSUniqueIdentifier,SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceDomainORWorkgroup,SMS_R_SYSTEM.Client from SMS_R_System inner join SMS_G_System_OPERATING_SYSTEM on SMS_G_System_OPERATING_SYSTEM.ResourceID
= SMS_R_System.ResourceID where SMS_G_System_OPERATING_SYSTEM.Caption like "% Windows 7 %"
And it's working.
What I want the collection to do, is to update membership so Members Count is based on clients that is actively communicating with the SCCM server, and exclude those who haven't communicated with the server for 40 days.

GREAT NEWS :D I've managed to configure the Clients Status by following the previous guide that i posted from technet.
Now is the only challenge to complete the Query. As i wrote above :
I don't understand is where to put the "client = active" statement, i've tried like this but it gives me This query has a syntax error, Are you sure you want to save it? Yes / No
select SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceID,SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceType,SMS_R_SYSTEM.Name,SMS_R_SYSTEM.SMSUniqueIdentifier,SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceDomainORWorkgroup,SMS_R_SYSTEM.Client from SMS_R_System inner join SMS_G_System_OPERATING_SYSTEM on SMS_G_System_OPERATING_SYSTEM.ResourceID
= SMS_R_System.ResourceID where SMS_G_System_OPERATING_SYSTEM.Caption like "% Windows 7 %" client = active
Thank you very much for your time.

Update rules:Conditional update

Hi
Can we use update rules to conditionally update fields in a record.
By condtionally i mean to say that, from a delta record ,can we have some conditions so that based on that, we will update the fields.
Like based on conditions , we will update only selected fields .Is it possible using
update rules or by any other ways at the BW side.
Regards
Leon

Hi Dash
Please have a look at the req. below.
We have a scenario in which we have values for few fields when a record is created. But once the record is updated ,we will lose those by overwriting that with initial.But we need to maintain those values for those fields to be retained in the BW system in the delta update.
Eg. We have 50 fields in the extract structure , and for fields X,Y we have values 'S1','S2' respectively(char values ) when a record is created,but when the record is updated in CRM system,it will be overwritten by initial.So in the available delta record ,we dont have the values 'S1','S2'.But in the BW system, we need to have the same original values instead of initial value in the delta record.
Can you suggest a solution to maintain the original values ?
Does BW support conditional update,like based on condition check,update the some selected fields of the record instead of updating with all the fields in the delta record?
Regards
Leon

Set Rule conditions for Determine Tax Applicability rules

Hi
We are doing Tax setups In Release 12. We need to setup the Rule condition for Determine tax Applicability as Applicable. can you please tell me the Naivgation Path.
Regards
Venkateswaran R

rules contain a number of rule conditions each of which has its own parameters, like:
tell application "Mail"
set new_rule to make new rule at end of rules with properties {name:"New Rule", all conditions must be met:true, move message:mailbox "Some Mailbox"}
tell new_rule
make new rule condition at end of rule conditions with properties {rule type:from header, qualifier:equal to value, expression:"[email protected]"}
make new rule condition at end of rule conditions with properties {rule type:subject header, qualifier:does contain value, expression:"Trigger Phrase"}
end tell
end tell

An Outlook rule that triggers a script gets deactivated every few weeks

Hi all,
I wrote a simple set of Outlook rules. One of them triggers a VB script that copies attachments of incoming mails (with a specific title and destination) to a share on a server. I added a certificate so that the user doesnt have to allow the script to run.
Every few weeks, the rule stops being executed. When i check it, the rule is shown in red, and it's marked with the word "error".
However, none of the parameters is shown in red.
I had our IT dept. increase the mail server's storage limit to the max, but that didn't fix it.
My current work-around:
in the Rule Description, i click on the link that specifies which script has to be run if the rule's conditions are met. Next, i pick the same script, and all is fine again.
Sadly, this is not acceptable to my co-workers, and i'm afraid i'll have to find another solution if i don't get this fixed soon-ish...
Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Hi,
Press Win + R and type “outlook.exe /cleanrules” in the blank box, then press Enter.
Opening Outlook with the /cleanrules switch will get rid of any corrupt rules, after this please recreate the rules and test the result.
Note,you will lose current rules so it might be a good idea to export them first.
(Import or export a set of rules:
http://office.microsoft.com/en-in/outlook-help/import-or-export-a-set-of-rules-HP010355072.aspx)
Let me know the result.
Regards.
Melon Chen
TechNet Community Support
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

How to configure ACS 5.2 for policy condition on TACACS+ Service

In https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3953175#3953175 thread, I was able to get the ACS 5.2 work with SRX for both SSH CLI and J-Web TACACS+ accounts. However, I found the behavior is different on our production environment. I found our ACS 5.2 was configured authorization rule with condition "TACACS+ Service" = "junos-exec". I don't know how to configure this on my ACS 5.2 Please guide me how to configure this.
I found there was NO TACACS+ "Authorization Request" when access via J-Web in our production SRX and ACS. However, there were TACACS+ "Authorzation Request" when access via J-Web in our production SRX and ACS. The difference between my lab ACS and production ACS is the authorization rule condition. In my condition, I configure with all "SRX" Device Type. but in our production ACS 5.2, it was configure to TACACS+ Service=junos-exec. so I like to test it in our lab to find out the difference. Thanks.

I would suggest you to go through the below two link.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/net_mgmt/cisco_secure_access_control_system/5.2/migration/guide/Migration_Configure.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/net_mgmt/cisco_secure_access_control_system/5.2/user/guide/common_scenarios.html

Rule loses condition

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for