Rule to be determined from Responsibility

Hi,
I know the responsibility number, I need to know in which rule it falls. How do I get this?

Hi Tiyasha De
If you know responsible number go to the table HRP1240. In this table OTYPE = Ry and OBJID = responsible number you will get the rule number in EXT_OBJID field.
Regards
vijay

Similar Messages

Is there a way to create a rule that sends and Auto Response for a shared mailbox?

I have a shared mailbox set up that receives emails that are sent to 3 different addresses:
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
I would like to create a rule that would send an auto response when someone emails one of these addresses. However, I don't want an auto response sent to [email protected] so I can't just set up an "out of office" reply for the mailbox.
Is there a way that I can create a rule to send an automated response to 2 of the 3 addresses?
Nate

Hi
we can enable the shared mailbox in ADUC and create Outlook rules for it in Outlook to achieve it. please follow these steps:
1. In Active Directory Users and Computers, right-click the shared mailbox and click Enable Account.
2. Configure the Outlook account for the shared mailbox in Outlook.
3. Click Rules > Manage Rules & Alerts.
4. Create a rule like the following format:
Apply this rule after the message arrives
Have server reply using a specific message
Except if the subject contains specific words
Select exception(s) (if necessary) of the Outlook Rule - (“except if from people or public group“)
5. Apply the auto reply rules for this shared mailbox.
Then users can receive auto reply of the shared mailbox except the exceptions we have set when they send messages to this shared mailbox.
Remember to mark as helpful if you find my contribution useful or as an answer if it does answer your question.That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you

I want to create org data profile in service scenario, with price determination from sales org, distribution centre , can any one help me with these

i want to create org data profile in service scenario, with price determination from sales org, distribution centre , can any one help me with these
IF I CREATE SERVICE ORG WITH SERVICE SCENARIO ORG DATA PROFILE,
MY PRICING IS NOT GETTING DETERMINED AS IT IS LINKED TO SALES ORG AND DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL THROUGH PRICING DETERMINATION SO HOW TO DO THE CUSTOMIZATION FOR THIS SITUATION
WITH REGARDS,
SATHISH

Hi Satish,
Please assign the org det. rules to org det. profile with Sales and Service scenarios and then assign the org. det. profile to transaction type. The below screenshot is just for your reference.
Hope it would fix your issue.
Regards,

Org determination from Sales area

Guys,
Here's the scenario..we have downloaded all Org structure from R/3. I need the sales org, sales office & group to be determined from the sales area maintained in the BP master data. Currently all BP's have only one Sales Area assigned.
The structure looks like this ..
XY10 - Sales Org Unit
   XA01 - Sales Office
        XG01 - Sales Group
        XG02 - Sales Group
I have checked all of them as Object Permitted in determination. (well if I don't ..then they are not available for selection while maintaining sales area data for BP). I am using the standard Rule '10000144' (Sales area Inc Master Data'). the problem is automatic Determination is failing because its proposing all the Sales offices & sales group as well for Sales Org.
How do I make it to select the one Sales Org only? the same determination should also work when I create and replicate a Sales order from R/3.
Another issue. When I did a consistency check(For Obj permitted in determination) for the Sales office(XA01), I get a error "Attribute IS_SA_ORG can only be assigned once within the assignment hierarchy".
Any suggestions on how to overcome the above issues?
(Note: I am already aware of the buffer update report 'HRBCI_ATTRIBUTES_BUFFER_UPDATE' and I run it every time I make any change.)
Thanks,
Reddy

Guys,
I have created my own rule and it works sucsessully. i still have the consistency check for one of the Sales Office.
Here's my new problem. When I download the sales order from R/3, it determines the Sales Org but is unable to determine Org unit. (If you look in Org tab of sales order, the Sales Org & Org Unit are two different fields). I looked at the log and found that for some reason its finding more than one Org unit!
I tried to create a new Order in CRM with the same BP and the rule works perfectly and only one org unit is found. So for some reason the rule evaluation fails for downloaded orders
Is there any note or setting that I am missing?
Would appreciate any help in this regard.

Lead Org determination from Employee responsible

Hi,
We are creating leads by executing campaigns. Now when leads are created, Sales org is determined from user who has logged into the system, however I want to change this. Sales org in lead should be determined by employee responsible.
I am not sure which org determination rule should be used and if there is any other customization that has to be done along with this to resolve this issue.
Please help.
Thanks,
Bhushan

Is there a standard rule for this...with some of my research i feel like this can be achieved with Org determination rule 10000194 and Partner Function ORG = Person Responsible.
I would like to know other impacts if I change my current Partner Function ORG from Activity Partner to Person Responsible. Will it affect Partner Determination Procedure??
Regards,
BJ

Set Rule conditions for Determine Tax Applicability rules

Hi
We are doing Tax setups In Release 12. We need to setup the Rule condition for Determine tax Applicability as Applicable. can you please tell me the Naivgation Path.
Regards
Venkateswaran R

rules contain a number of rule conditions each of which has its own parameters, like:
tell application "Mail"
set new_rule to make new rule at end of rules with properties {name:"New Rule", all conditions must be met:true, move message:mailbox "Some Mailbox"}
tell new_rule
make new rule condition at end of rule conditions with properties {rule type:from header, qualifier:equal to value, expression:"[email protected]"}
make new rule condition at end of rule conditions with properties {rule type:subject header, qualifier:does contain value, expression:"Trigger Phrase"}
end tell
end tell

PR00 120 G/L account 0000785101 determined from Account determination type

Hi all,
I am getting the following error while saving sales order.
PR00 120 G/L account 0000785101 determined from Account determination type
I dont know why this error is occuring while creating sales order. Because of this issue, i am not able to save the sales order.
How to solve this issue? Can anyone give me solution for this issue?
Thanks in advance,
Babu

Hiii
I hope you people are using COPA or Controlling in your process.
This error is basically comes if you are not maintained the KOFK setting, same where u have done your KOFI setting, you have to do same with KOFK in Transaction VKOA.
see what setting you have done for KOFI, copy that line and change KOFI to KOFK and save it.
Hope it will solve your problem
Regards
Shambhu Sarkar

How to change Price determination from blank to 2

Hi expert,
     I had a difficult problem:
     Material ledger is active in our company Normally, in material master data accounting view 1, we always set price determination 2 and price control S. Price determination 2 is set default if creating a material master by entering no price determination.
     Today, my Key user came accross a prblem: In our company, for batch processing of material master, we use a IDOC to process inputting material master fields including the price determination field. But, because absence of the key user, price determination were set blank (neither 2 or 3, In MBEW table, field MLAST is blank) when inputting material master. all data were imported without error warnings. But ,acturally, all materials' price determination in accounting view 1 was set Blank! This is a big problem that we can not release standard price or do any other price changing~~~.
     I have used CKMM to try to change price determination. But it failed: it can not identify this situation because old price determination must be set a word rather than blank in CKMM.
      I don't know any other solutions to change price determination from Blank into 2. Specially, some materials that had already lots of movements and prices changing.
     Hope you can help me out. Very thankful!

Hi,
Currently the materials are inconsistent and there is no way to repair them with the standard
programs. The problem should be corrected by Sap Support. Please create a oss message
providing a detailed description of the incidence and the remote connection to check the problem
in the system.
Sorry for not giving you a better alternative.
Regards,
MLM

BPEL invoke Webserivce Transport can not be determined from uri REPLACE_WI

Hi,
I am in the process of migrating BPEL 10.1.3.4 to SOA 11.1.1.5.0. I am seeing problems with bpel invoking the webservice. Webservice is available and I could test with the test option in EM successfully. But when I tried to bring up the BPEL process which invokes the webservice, i get the following error.
<Jan 29, 2012 5:12:41 PM EST> <Error> <oracle.soa.bpel.engine.ws> <BEA-000000> <got FabricInvocationException
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Transport can not be determined from uri REPLACE_WITH_ACTUAL_URL
at oracle.j2ee.ws.common.transport.TransportFactory.getTransport(TransportFactory.java:48)
at oracle.j2ee.ws.common.async.MessageSender.call(MessageSender.java:63)
at oracle.j2ee.ws.common.async.Transmitter.transmitSync(Transmitter.java:134)
at oracle.j2ee.ws.common.async.Transmitter.transmit(Transmitter.java:90)
at oracle.j2ee.ws.common.async.RequestorImpl.transmit(RequestorImpl.java:273)
at oracle.j2ee.ws.common.async.RequestorImpl.invoke(RequestorImpl.java:95)
at oracle.j2ee.ws.client.jaxws.DispatchImpl.invoke(DispatchImpl.java:793)
at oracle.j2ee.ws.client.jaxws.OracleDispatchImpl.synchronousInvocationWithRetry(OracleDispatchImpl.jav
a:235)
I don't have this problem with different webservice and bpel processes. All the webservices were upgraded to 11g using Jdeveloper's Upgrade 10.1.3.4 JAX-RPC to 11g option.
Would appreicate if any help on this.
thanks
Kanchana

Hi
Please refer the below blog,this may resolve your problem.
http://albinoraclesoa.blogspot.com/2011/11/oracle-soa-suite-10g-to-11g-migration_9478.html
Regards
Albin I

How ERP Movement Type is being determined from EWM

Hello,
Could you explain me, how ERP Movement is being determined from EWM goods movement posting?
For example, when I upload the stock, ERP movement is determined at 561. When we do, Goods Receipt, ERP movement is determined as 101. How this movements are controlled or being determined.
Regards,
Sathish

Hi,
there are some systemtables, starting with "/SCWM/TIMBWA*", which are being used for the determination.
Brgds
Juergen
Want to learn EWM?
Check for EWM courses @ https://training.sap.com/curriculum/scm_ewm
Get a SAP Learning Hub Subscription: https://training.sap.com/shop/learninghub

Lync 2013 Crashes When Transferring From Response Group

Hello,
Seeing a very strange issue on a couple of our clients running Lync 2013. Whenever they transfer a call from their response group Lync will crash. Calls into their direct line will transfer just fine. Here are two of the event logs we have
seen from this.
Faulting application name: lync.exe, version: 15.0.4569.1503, time stamp: 0x52b0bd5c
Faulting module name: mso.dll, version: 15.0.4569.1506, time stamp: 0x52e0dcca
Exception code: 0xc0000005
Fault offset: 0x0000000001828520
Faulting process id: 0x1550
Faulting application start time: 0x01cf4766655f5ead
Faulting application path: C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office15\lync.exe
Faulting module path: C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Office15\mso.dll
Report Id: cbd75420-b38c-11e3-ae5c-0026b9dd72ee
Faulting application name: lync.exe, version: 15.0.4569.1503, time stamp: 0x52b0bd5c
Faulting module name: LyncDesktopViewModel.dll, version: 15.0.4569.1503, time stamp: 0x52b0c3a2
Exception code: 0xc0000005
Fault offset: 0x0000000000119795
Faulting process id: 0xee0
Faulting application start time: 0x01cf4757f9b12418
Faulting application path: C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office15\lync.exe
Faulting module path: C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office15\LyncDesktopViewModel.dll
Report Id: 9db0d18d-b359-11e3-ae5c-0026b9dd72ee
We have tried a number of things this to get this working, but nothing has worked.
Installed Office 2013 SP1
Completely re imaged the client's computers
Deployed new Polycom Lync phones
Completely removed clients from their response group and the Lync server and added them back
I'm not sure where to go from here or what might be causing this. I would appreciate any thoughts you might have. Thank you!

By default, calls from Response Groups ignore call forwarding or simultaneous ring settings.
Lisa Zheng
TechNet Community Support

Syntax of a query rule to exclude results from site collection

Hi,
I'm trying to edit a query rule to exclude results from a site collection.
I'm coping the "Local SharePoint Results" and want to add something like -path=http://server/sites/demo/*
but somehow it doesn't work. can someone help with the exact syntax (should to write http, "", to write with {} etc.)
keren tsur

-SiteId:<guid>
should work. Or:
-path:http://server/sites/sitecollection
Thanks,
Mikael Svenson
Search Enthusiast - SharePoint MVP/MCT/MCPD - If you find an answer useful, please up-vote it.
http://techmikael.blogspot.com/
Author of Working with FAST Search Server 2010 for SharePoint

Drop the Rules of one table from existing bi directional replication setup

Hi All,
I have one small question on bi directional replication setup, Its regarding table add in existing replication setup.
What happened ,When we add a new table to existing replication setup if any reason table is not replicating between two database even we are not getting
any error in dba_apply_error ,then we have to remove the rules for that particular table and setup again. Some time what happened we got error "queue has
errors" i dont know the ORA number. But in that case what happened Apply process ABORETED and when we try to start the process it gives same error
("Queue has errors" ) and ABORTED again.
then on metalink for doc id 203225.1 .we have remove the whole replication Manually and setup again. It's horriable....
Could you please help that before drop the rules for particular table from exisitng bi directional replication setup then wht should we do ?
Do we need to unscheduled the propagation process and then drop the rules becuase i read on metalink that reason behind the error ,queue has errors
"negative rules drops while propagation process using the same rule set" .
Please Suggest!!!!!!!!!!
Many Thanks

How huge those tables?. If those are small tables use Oracle MINUS function to get the defference records.

Error Message: Real estate object cannot be determined from entries

Hi
We are using the BBPIV01 IDoc Type to pass Invoice data to backend system. We have implemented BBP_ACC_CHECK_ICC BADI to update the RL_EST_KEY (Internal Key for Real Estate Object) field. But when the IDoc is processed in the backend system it end up with the following error message.
<b>Real estate object cannot be determined from entries (ID: RECAAP, No: 012 ).</b>
Note: We are treating Real Estate Contract as an Account Assignment Category in SRM.
Any help would be highly appreciated.
Regards
Kathirvel

Hi Ramki
I have check the same i.e. in ECC. All the necessary changes explained in the notes have already been done in the release we are using. And I meant that the notes are not relevant for the problem I am facing now.
Thanks a lot for your concern.
Regards
Kathirvel

Real estate object cannot be determined from entries

Hi All,
When i am posting GLs (T.codes FB50L & FB50), i got error like Real estate object cannot be determined from entries,
For this i am using the one expence account and one bank account,
As we know for the bank acccounts Value date is mandatory, If i give the value date the system is showing the above error,
If i dont give the value date system is allowing to post,
Give me the solution and what is the cause of the error,
Thanks ,
Kalyan.

Hi
You are posting outgoing payment for GL through FB50/L.
Use F-07 - Outgoing payment other then customer/vendor.
Regards
Sampath

Rule to be determined from Responsibility

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for