Rules Based ATP with Stock Transport Order

Hi All,
Can we use Rules Based ATP with Stock Transport Order..
Where to assign the business transaction to the STO order type ?
Regards,
Biswajit

Hi,
Please follow the link
Re: Rules based product substitution in STO
Thanks,
Pavan Verma

Similar Messages

Rule Based GATP with Stock transfer order

Hi Experts,
I have activated the rule based with stock transfer GATP, but I have the following two issues
1. when I change sales order in EEC and make a ATP check , the system will not conisder the previous created stock transfer requisition and create a seperate stock transfer requisition, that is, if I trigger 10 times ATP check, the system will create another 10 stock transfer requisition. does anyone know how to let the system delete the previous stock transfer requisition , then create a new one, or using the existing stock transfer requisition?
2. the generated stock transfer requisition is always firmed, it causes if the sales order is deleted, the system can not delete the requisition via heuristic. how to let the system generate unfirmed stock transfer requisition?
thanks

Rick,
I have never researched this, so I don't know.
The reason I have never looked at this is because I would never want any other process to change supply elements generated by the GATP process. Once these elements are disturbed, then the confirmations of the Sales orders are also open to be disturbed. Regular runs of BackOrder Processing, which accompany most ATP solutions, can then change the sales docs with unpredictable results. Even without BOP, the next Sales person who re-ATPs the order might be in for an unpleasant surprise.
Best regards,
DB49

Sales order ATP check - stock transport order

Hi,
When the sales orders is created it performs availability check on stock transport order as per the settings and confirms quantity. However, when the stock transport order carries a batch which has a restricted status, the sales order still confirms the quantity based on the stock transport order delivery date. I have applied OSS notes 350864 and 154682, but still the system confirms quantity, which has restricted status at batch level in stock transport order.
Can any one help with a solution for this scenario?
Thanks,
Shiva

Hi
Try the following exits.
EXIT_SAPLATPC_001
EXIT_SAPLATPC_002.
Reward points if this helps.
Regards
Karan

Sales order stock with stock transport orders

Dear all,
We are on ECC 6.0.
We are using intracompnay stock transport orders from one plant to other. Sales orders are created in one plant with a purchase requisition and then converted to a purchase order with order type UB on the supplying plant. The supplying plant is also defined as a customer using the different account group for the plant as customer.
When this purchase orders are delivered from the supplying plant using replenishment delivery NL we get an error performing the goods issue for the delivery.The error message is M7 184 -Sales order stock & & does not exist. System is checking for the sales order number in the supplying plant while performing the goods issue. However the sales order is in the receiving plant.
Does some body have an idea how to resolve this?
We are also using material ledger and the transfer pricing mechanism between intracompany sotck transfers.
Thank you in advance.
Regards,
Kartik Shah

Hello ,
i have the same issue.I checked in MD04 transaction and for this delivery i get this message
Diagnosis
The finish date of the order proposal lies in the past.
System Response
This exception is displayed in the MRP list and in the stock/requirements list.
This situation may occur if in Customizing for the plant in question, the automatic forward scheduling was switched off for MRP.
Procedure
Check whether the order proposal should be rescheduled.
anyone can help me ?
Regards

Packaging material items with stock transport orders

Hello!
I am writing regarding SAP note 848529 - we want to add packaging material (VERP) to the delivery document and move cross-company with sock transport order.
I made copy of movement type 601 and succesfully wrote off materials to consumption account.
Now I have problem - how to receive those materials in other end? Movements 101 and 501 doesn't work, because there is no reference document (for 101) and incorrect accounts are used for 501.

Movement type 501 is working.

Problem with stock transport order account assignment

hi gurus,
I've a situation in ECC 6.0 environment in regard to STO that I hope you can shed some lights.
We're doing an upgrade from 4.6 to ECC6 and I'm doing some preliminary tests in the new box and I'm getting KI235 error message "Account xxx requires an assignment to a CO object", when I try to posts goods issue from the delivery document. When I assign a dummy cost center to the cost element, I can post the document and I get a CO and SPL accounting documents. In 4.6 there is no accounting document generated as the result of goods issue and this is what client wants. I've checked the release notes and OSS as well checked the setting for automatic account assignment in MM but I couldn't find any difference. I need to add that the material that I use is non-valuated but there is an accounting view for the material with valuation class. I'm just baffled that the goods issue for the same materials in 4.6 works without producing accounting documents but it doesn't work in ECC.
Any suggestion is greatly appreciated.

Hi
If the material is non valuated then the accounting view should not be present, by mistakenly may be you have maintained the accounting view for the material type & maintined the accounting view in Material master.
If you dont want the accounting document generated, then you need to first de-select the accounting view for the material type & make the material as non valuted by removing the flag on Value update for the Plant.
now create anew material & test the transaction, if you want to use the sam eold material then make the Moving average price of the material to zero first & then change the Price control to S. & Test the transaction.
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

Questions on Rules-Based ATP and Purchase Requisitions for STOs

Hello experts,
We are working on rules-based ATP configuration and have several questions about the functionality. Iu2019m hoping that some of you are using this functionality and can help give us direction.
In our environment we have multiple distribution centers and multiple manufacturing plants. We want to confirm sales orders against stock and production orders in any of those plants, depending on the locations that have stock or planned production. For example, we will place a sales order against plant A. If there is not enough stock in plant A then rules-based ATP will use location determination to check in plant B, then C. The scope of check on the ATP check will include stock and released production orders. We will configure plant A as the u201Cconsolidation locationu201D so if stock is found in plants B or C then stock transport orders will automatically be created to move the stock to plant A before shipping to the customer.
We have configured rules-based ATP and this functionality is working well in our Development system. The ATP check is executed and uses the rules-based ATP to find eligible stock in other plants. The system is also creating purchase requisitions to move the stock to the consolidation plant.
Our first concern is that there doesnu2019t appear to be any firm linkage between the sales order and the resulting purchase requisition. For example, if we create sales order 123 for plant A and the rules-based ATP finds stock in plant B it automatically creates a purchase requisition 987 to move the stock from plant B to plant A. However, there doesnu2019t appear to be a linkage between sales order 123 and purchase requisition 987. For instance, if we delete sales order 123 the purchase requisition doesnu2019t get deleted.
Our second concern is that the quantity on the purchase requisition can still be confirmed against later sales orders. For example, say the above scenario resulted in a purchase requisition 987 that consumed all the stock available in plant B. We then create a second sales order 456 for the same product. Plant A is out of stock so the rules-based ATP looks in plant B. We would expect that plant B would also not have any stock because itu2019s all been consumed by the purchase requisition. Instead, the system creates a second purchase requisition to move quantity from plant B to plant A. Itu2019s as if the system doesnu2019t realize that the purchase requisition 987 is already planning to move stock out of plant B.
Does anyone have any thoughts or suggestions on these two scenarios? Is there a way to configure the system so there is a hard linkage between the sales order and the purchase requisition so that if the sales order is deleted then the purchase requisition is also deleted? Should ATP realize that purchase orders are consuming inventory and not allow later sales orders to confirm against that same inventory? Any advice or experience would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
David Eady
Application Delivery Team Lead
Propex, Inc.

Hi,
The scheduling is done in SCM, and from there, whenever the RBA is triggered, the calculation is done always with the old route in SCM. Until you get back to R/3 this is when your route is determined. But the ATP check is always with the original route. So the idea would be that you change the values of the route while still in APO, this is possible via the user exit. Should be done in scheduling in APO.
Hope this information is helpful.
Regards,
Tibor

Rule based ATP check

Hello,
We are implementening rule based ATP check for Sales order scnerio. Our Business process is
1.Customer will cretate order for product P1 & Location L1.
If stock is available, system will confirm the order else it should search for alternate product & location in following swquence
2. Product P2, Location L1
3. Product P1, Location L2
4. Product P2, Location L2
We have maintained all the configuration as per SAP bulding block for Rule based ATP check in SAP & APO server.
Problem : If stock for requested Product location is not available, syetem does not propose the stock of alternate product & location as maintained in rule sequence. It gives error as :
"No product found" "Internal error: Item /000000"
Would appreciate if anyone can share information on fixing ths issue?
With Regards
Mangesh A. Kulkarni

hello
We have resolved the issue at our end..
It was due to activation of unwanted exit in APO..
Regards
Mangesh A. Kulkarni

Plant as Vendor Defination and Assignment, for Stock Transport Order.

Hallow All,
Can anybody explain the procedure of Plant as Vendor defination and their assignment for the Stock transfer with Stock Transport Order.
Thanks in advance !!!!!!

hi
Following are the steps:
1.Create a vendor for the company code of receiving plant, using account group :0007 using T-Code XK01.
2 Assign this vendor to Delivering plant
Go to XK02 >Purchasing view>Extras>Add. Purchasing data>Plant
3. Create internal customer with the sales area of the vendor. Go To XD01
4.In Pricing procedure determination relevant to STO, assign document Pricing Procedure and customer pricing procedure appropriate for STO to get the pricing in the invoice.
5.Maintain condition records for the relevant pricing condition.
6. Some more setting for STO: Go to MM> Purchasing > Purchase Order > Set up STO> define shipping data for plants > Go to Receiving plant >assign customer here & Supplying SA (for billing) to Receiving plant here
7. Go to MM> Purchasing > Purchase Order > Set up STO> define shipping data for plants > Go to Supplying plant and assign the sales area of receiving plant.
8. Go to MM> Purchasing > Purchase Order > Set up STO> assign delivery Type & Checking rule
Assign the delivery type to document type. In this case, Delivery type NLCC is assigned to Document type NB
9. Go to MM> Purchasing > Purchase Order > Set up STO>Assign document Type, One step Procedure, Under delivery tolerance
Assign the document type NB to supplying plant and receiving plant
10. After all settings , Create the STO using T-Code:ME21n and Save.
11. Create Delivery :VL10G
Click on the Background Button after selecting line item
A message is flashed : See log for information> next Click on Log for delivery creation Button >click on line item>click on document button to get Delivery document No
12. Picking, PGI:[VL02n
13. Billing:VF01n
Save the document and its done
try this
reward points if heilpful

APO Rule based ATP for RA Repair

Hey,
Could you please help me to turn on rule based ATP for document type RA outbound?
The senario is as follows:
Customer returns to my company the product.
My company has multiple locations (plants) for replacement products. I would like to determine the replacement product location with rule-based ATP. We use rule-based ATP for the sales site w/o issues.
I set up in configuration:
ZRA (copy of RA) with business transaction RMA(to trigger the rule based ATP)
Assigned ZRA / Item usage = R104/ PSTYV= ZXNN (item category allows rule based ATP).
ZRA     ZNO1     R104     IRRA     ZXNN
I also did the below rules based ATP item catgegory determination:
AUART        MTPOS         VWPOS        UEPST         PSTYV
ZRA     ZNO1     APO0     ZTP1     ZXNN
ZRA     ZNO1     APO1          ZTP1
ZRA     ZNO1     APO1     ZXNN     ZTP1
ZRA     ZNO1     APO2     ZTP1     ZXNN
When I create with VA01 a ZRA order and add a replacement plant then I get this message:
The ATP rules are not called up for item 000030 - Message no. /SAPAPO/ATP147
But when I go from the "APO Availability Check" view to the Rule then I see my rules determined.
The detail message also says that the system "things" the line was already delivered, which is not the case.
Could you please tell me if it is possible to combine rule-based ATP with the RA replacement process and if yes how to do it?
Thanks,
Sabine

Check OSS Note 571044 - RBA: Use of calculation profiles and rules
Regards,

Intercompany billing: can price date be taken from stock transport order UB

Hi,
I have an issue and I think that I'm not the first person who has this problem.
We are working with stock transport orders (UB) to relocate goods from one plant to the other (different company codes). We have some troubles with different prices in the purchase order and in the intercompany invoice because of different pricing dates.
Example:
1. the stock transport order is created on 15.02.2012 --> here the price date is 15.02.2012
2. the delivery is created on 25.02.2012 (PGI date 25.02.2012)
3. the intercompany invoice is created. On item level is placed the pricing date 25.02.2012
This situation may lead to a price difference, as already happened several times.
Do I have any chance to take out the pricing date from the stock transport order into the IC invoice?
thanks for help.
Chris

In the copy control settings (t.code VTFL), go to item level and check what value assigned in the field price source. Assign value A and test by creating new documents. If this solution does not resolve your issue, then check the routine assingned in the field Data VBRK/VBRP. In t.code VOFM, copy this routine and create a new routine with additional code for VBRP-PRSDT to have STO pricing date and then add this route in field VBRK/VBRP.
Regards,

Rule Based ATP- Error in calling up function 'BAPI_APOATP_CHECK' in APO ser

Hi Experts
I hae configured Rule Based ATP with Multi-Level ATP check. I have completed all configuration required for Rule Based ATP but still facing an error
" Error in calling up function 'BAPI_APOATP_CHECK' in APO server 'SC5CLNT001': Check instructions 30 / A does not exist for locat"
Have any of you ever encountered this error?
Regards,
Sushovan Datta

Dear Sushovan,
Most likely cause of the above error is a missing requirement class in R/3 and missing Check mode in APO for material and plant combination.
Please read the F1-Help for field check mode in APO:
"Together with the business event, the check mode derived from the product master defines the type and scope of the checks carried out. It also controls forecast consumption.
SD (R/3) uses the requirement class of the requirement as check mode. As of R/3 Plugin 2000.1, the requirement class is transferred (via the strategy group in the material master) to the location-specific APO product master (ATP tab page). In the process, no plausibility check is carried out. For this reason, you should not enter any other check mode in the product master. (The check mode in the product master must agree with the requirement class from the R/3 system.)"
So please create for your material in corresponding plant the requirement class ' 030' assigned to the strategy group in MRP3 in R/3 and the same in the check mode field in //mat1 in APO.
Afterwards the gatp check will find the check mode and business event (check instructions) and the error will be not appear again.
Regards,
Tibor

Link between batch stock and stock transport order no.

hello all,
my client want the report for stock in hand against batch and sto no..in standard tcode mb52(stock in hand) we can see the stock against batches.but i want the report for which sto no. stock is recieved corresponding to batch.
pls tell me from which table and field i should pick data for stock against sto no.
thanks in advance for ur valuable input
regards
simran
caution-- we are using two step procedure with stock transport order for transferring the material between plants

S

Rule based ATP check with SOA

Hello,
We wish to implement ATP check using Ent Services.
Details:
Environment : SAP ECC 6.o with Enhancement Package 3/ SCM 5.0
Ent service used: /SAPAPO/SDM_PARCRTRC : ProductAvailabilityRequirementCreateRequestConfirmation
We were able to carry out Product check using the service. However we are unable to carry out rule based ATP check using the same service.
We have carried out the entire configuration as per SAP's building block configuration guide for Global ATP & SAP Note 1127895.
For RBA <Rule based ATP check>, we are getting the results as expected when we create Sales order from SAP R/3 (Transaction VA01), however ATP simulation in APO & Ent service does not give the results as expected. When we carry out ATP simulation in APO / Ent service, results are same as Product check & not as RBA i.e. they respect only requested Product location stock & does not propose alternate Product or Location in case of shortages
Plz share the experience to fix the issue
Mangesh A. Kulkarni

Hi mangesh
Check this links , not very sure , but may help you...
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/erplo/availability%252bchecking%252bin%252bsap
Re: ATP confirmation in CRM
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/scm/rba
Regards
Abhishek

HELP for all 5 TYPES of STO Stock Transport Orders with detailed scenario

PLEASE help me understanding the detailed scenarios for all 5 TYPES of STO s
as in my day to day job activities , i frequently handles issues related to STO s
PLEASE HELP WITH DETAILED STEP BY STEP SCENARIOS

Hi Jagatram,
Standard SAP has the following methods For Stock transport order:
1) One Step Transfer stock without using purchasing documents; Use movement type 301.
2) Two Step Transfer stock without using purchasing documents; Use movement type 303 in Supplying plant and movement type 305 in receiving plant.
3) Using Standard Transport Order (STO) without delivery in two steps. STO created in T-Code ME27, receiving plant posts goods issue (for returns), movement type 351 and supplying plant post goods receipt from using movement type 101.
4) Using Standard Transport Order (STO) with delivery in one step. STO created in T-Code ME27, Receiving plant creates shipment and Goods issue document (for materials to be returned) with movement type 647 and goods receipt document with movement type 101 both created in one step.
5) Using Standard Transport Order (STO) with delivery in two steps. STO created in T-Code ME27, Receiving plant creates shipment and Goods issue posted (for materials to be returned) with movement type 641.Goods receipt is posted in the supplying plant, movement type 101.
6) Using Transportation scheduling agreement (TSA) with delivery in two steps. TSA created in T-Code ME37. Receiving plant creates shipment and Goods issue document (for materials to be returned) with movement type 641. Goods receipt is posted in the supplying plant, movement type 101.
To achieve it, necessary configurations has to be done in Tcode- OMGN.
SPRO>> Materials management>> Purchasing>> Purchase Order>> Set up Stock transport Order:
1. Plant: For the receiving plant, maintain customer No-Plant (If using STO with delivery), for the Sales Org, Dist channel and Division.
2. Checking Rule: Create checking rule.
3. Define checking rule : Usually no change required here.
4. Assign delivery type/checking rule: Assign the document type(UB) - Supplying plant- Delivery type(NL).
5. Purchasing document type: Maintain the supplying plant- Receiving plant relationships for the doc type-UB, either 1-step or 2-step, as per business.
Hope this helps!
Regards,
Shilpa

Rules Based ATP with Stock Transport Order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for