Runtime error at maintain insp lot origins and assign inspection types

Hi all,
When i want to assign a new inspection type to lot origin 05 i get a runtime error. I don't know what's happening, but i think that it is caused because the system cannot find a record. When i look in TQ31 and TQ33 i see a line with lot origin 05. In table TQ32 there is no line.
I can still maintain all other inspection lot origins. I removed the inspection type from 05 and want to add another one, but it's not possible anymore because of the error...
Does anybody have an idea?

It sounds like you deleted the 05 insepction type that SAP delivers and had linked to origin 05
You shouldn't do that.
SAP is very picky about having the 01 variant assigned. You have deleted the 01 variant.
You can try to create it back maybe. If it fails, my guess is you'll have to have the basis team regenerate the TQ32 table from the 000 client. Then you'll have to redo any entries you need, like any custom inspection types.
FF

Similar Messages

Maintain new inspection lot origin and assign inspection types

Hi,
I want to Maintain new inspection lot origin and assign inspection types .For Ex: 90, NoRange: 90 DCr :001 ,TL Type : S and Stat : 4 because i want to maintain TL Tpe S- reference operation set.
Please provide me the solution.
Regards,
Niyas.

Hi
As per SAP std You can not create a Inpsection lot origine but you can certainly create a Inspection type.
Just a suggesion..
Try Inspection lot origin: 89 (Misc) NoRange: 90 DCr :001 ,TL Type : S and Stat : 4
and create Inspection type 90 with varient 01/02 in inspection lot origine 01.
This will solve your purpose
Regards
Sujit

Quality Management - Insp lot origin

I am using insp lot origin 89 for certain inspections. I want to split the inspection into two types.I want different number ranges for those inspection types.
Hence I think I should create new inspection lot origin by copying from '89' so that I can assign different number ranges to them.
But I don't find the way to create insp lot origin.
Pls advise.

Hi Greetings
As per standard SAP, you can not create a new Inspection type origin.
The inspection lot origins are predefined by SAP in Customizing for Inspection Lot Creation. You cannot define your own inspection lot origins.
Hence it not possible t assign different number ranges as you requested.
Help.sap link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/be/00bbd5ca5311d2961800a0c930e04c/frameset.htm
Gobinathan G
Edited by: Gobinathan Govindarajan on Nov 5, 2008 6:28 PM
Edited by: Gobinathan Govindarajan on Nov 5, 2008 6:31 PM

Assigning inspection lot origin to new movement type

Dear Gurus,
I have created a new movement type. How do i assign inspection lot origin to this new movement type?
Regards,
Abhishek

Dear Sujit,
We are using inspection lot origin 06 for customer returns. However 06 doesn't allow you to post stock. The quality team wants to post the stock to unrestricted or scrap or blocked as per the inspection result. If we use inspection lot origin 05 then we are able to post stock for the inspection lot generated while transferring the stock form returns to quality. Now the problem is for prodn GR that is for FG we r using 05 for the same material. So there is a clash as inspection characteristics for FG and customer return is different but usage is becoming same-5. That's we are trying to create a new movement type 957 by copying 457 but we are unable to create and assign inspection lot origin to it.
Regards,
Abhishek

When to use insp. lot origin 03?

Hi,
I would like to set up QM for production and I am not sure whether I should use lot origin 03 with quality planning in the work plan or 04 with quality planning in insp. plan.
Up to know the quality planners are using insp. plan for certain inspections in production. Because we use a separate routing for each material in production the workload for the quality planners will rise up dramatically if I use lot origin 03.
Besides the integrated confirmations for operations, is there any feature for which I MUST use lot origin 03 and quality planning in work plans?

Marcus,
03 inspection is the in-process inspection. As the name suggests this is used if you production process requires in-process inspection. The specifications of the material getting processed may have some inspection characteristics which you want to record/ monitor and control the further production flow based on these results. If this is not the case and you want to record the inspection results of the final product only then 04 is sufficeint.
S decide upon based on the above and choose if 03 is required.
Ram

Runtime error when inserting rows in hrp1018 and hrt1018 tables

Hi All,
I have a requirement to insert row in hrp1018 and hrt1018 tables.These tables are interlinked.So, I have used FM 'RH_INSERT_INFTY'. The exact code which I have used is as follows.
*****************************************code***************************************************************
<< Please post only the relevant portion of the code >>
The runtime error which is coming is as follows:
Error analysis
    An internal error in the database interface occurred during access to
    the data of table "HRT1018 ".
    The situation points to an internal error in the SAP software
    or to an incorrect status of the respective work process.
    For further analysis the SAP system log should be examined
    (transaction SM21).
    For a precise analysis of the error, you should supply
    documents with as many details as possible.
Please let me know why this error is coming.I am not able to find out mistake in the FM and form used in the code.
Thanks in advance,
BBKrishna.
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Jun 9, 2009 1:31 PM

I am adding the code once again.Please let me know why the error is coming up.
lv_mproj = 'BLDNG'.
wa_p1018-mandt = sy-mandt.
wa_p1018-otype = '9M'.
wa_p1018-objid = '50009650'.
wa_p1018-begda = '20090608'.
wa_p1018-endda = '99991231'.
wa_p1018-infty = '1018'.
wa_p1018-plvar = '01'.
wa_p1018-otype = '9M'.
wa_p1018-istat = '1'.
append wa_p1018 to it_p1018.
repid = sy-repid.
*Updating hrp1018 and hrt1018 tables
CALL FUNCTION 'RH_INSERT_INFTY'
    EXPORTING
    FCODE                     = 'INSE'
    VTASK                     = 'D'
     AUTHY                    = ' '
      REPID                   = repid
      FORM                    = 'FILL_TABS'
    TABLES
      INNNN                   = it_p1018
EXCEPTIONS
   NO_AUTHORIZATION          = 1
   ERROR_DURING_INSERT       = 2
   REPID_FORM_INITIAL        = 3
   CORR_EXIT                 = 4
   BEGDA_GREATER_ENDDA       = 5
   OTHERS                    = 6
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
    CALL FUNCTION 'BALW_BAPIRETURN_GET'
      EXPORTING
        TYPE                             = SY-MSGTY
        CL                               = sy-msgid
        NUMBER                           = SY-MSGNO
PAR1                             = ' '
PAR2                             = ' '
PAR3                             = ' '
PAR4                             = ' '
LOG_NO                           = ' '
LOG_MSG_NO                       = ' '
     IMPORTING
       BAPIRETURN                        = return_rec
EXCEPTIONS
ONLY_2_CHAR_FOR_MESSAGE_ID       = 1
OTHERS                           = 2
    IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
        lv_mproj = text-011
                  ELSE.
                  ii_return = return_rec.
                  CONCATENATE                  ii_return-type '-' ii_return-message
                  INTO lv_err_msg SEPARATED BY SPACE.
    ENDIF.
ENDIF.
*RHCD_TAB-PROZT
   FORM fill_tabs TABLES ins_tab
               USING ins_set ins_index.
DATA : BEGIN OF set.
          INCLUDE STRUCTURE wplog.
DATA : END   OF set.
DATA: BEGIN OF h_pt1018.             "to initialize INS_TAB
          INCLUDE STRUCTURE pt1018.
DATA: END OF h_pt1018.
REFRESH ins_tab.
set = ins_set.
CASE set-infty.
    WHEN '1018'.
      h_pt1018-posnr = lv_mproj.
      h_pt1018-prozt = '100.00'.
      IF NOT ( h_pt1018 IS INITIAL ).
        CLEAR ins_tab.
        ins_tab+36(8) = lv_mproj. "h_pt1018.
        ins_tab+134(5) = '100.00'.
        APPEND ins_tab.
      ENDIF.
ENDCASE.
ENDFORM.

Runtime error with Adobe Reader 9.x and IE

I'm getting a runtime error with any adobe reader 9.x and Internet Explorer whenever a .pdf is being viewed online. It will pull the .pdf up and then pop up a runtime error window and close it down completely. It is only happening with individuals that have redirected app data folders and profiles. I have all machines running Windows XP sp3 and IE8. I know, I know, I can always go to Firefox or Chrome, but IE is easily managed with group policy lockdowns. I can unintall reader 9.x and then reinstall 8.x and it works perfectly. The only problem with that is that I have to go do every machine and physically uninstall since I buildt the windows xp installer package with it. Does anyone know a workaround or if adobe is going to get it fixed pretty soon?

I am experiencing exactly the same problems on one of two identical machines after something happened in the registry.
The first problem that appered was an error 1325 "Favorites is not a valid short name".
I did find the registry key involved (%userprofile%\Favorites) and fixed it.
So now the the next one: yours.
I think the solution can be found in the list of registry keys that Adobe Reader is accessing.
btw Eusing registry cleaner did not find this key to be in error.
Problem is that the Reader does not ask for an alternative location after stumbling on the key.
Who can gnerate a list of keys accessed?

HT201210 I keep getting a error message when I try to open itunes on my computer. It says runtime error R6034. I have unistalled and re-installed and keep getting the same message.

the error message reads Runtime error programC:\program.file\itunes\itunes.exe R6034 Application has made an error has made attempt to load the C runtime Library incorrectly. Please contact the applications support team for info. Can anyone help with this?

Follow the instructions of tt2 in: https://discussions.apple.com/thread/5822086

No inspection lot created for new inspection type created

Hi all,
We create a new inspection type which is based on a copy-version of an existing inspection type. These inspection type has a inspection type origin of standard SAP 04 (i.e. Goods Receipt from Production).
Question 1 - we bumped into problem when come to testing in which when perform goods receipt, there is no inspection lot created, may I know why?
The following fields of this new inspection type are all checked; those not specified, are not flagged.
1 - Insp with task list (flagged); Automatic Assginment (flagged); Check Chars (flagged); Skip Allow(flagged); Automatic UD(flagged); Serial Number Poss (flagged).
Question 2 - for this kind of inspection type with origin 04, do i need to perform a goods receipt against a production order or purchasing order? How do I perform a GR against a production order?
Thanks.

Hi Tuffy,
Possibly you might not have ticked on preferred inspection type in material master. This could be one of the reasons. Try to do GR after ticking this.
The setting you have mentioned (flagged parameters)are seems to be correct. But lot generation is governed by preferred inspection type.
If you have assigned this newly customized inspection type to lot origin 04, then it would be used against production order and not the purchase order.
There are several ways to carry out GR against production order. It depends on the scenarios which you follow
1.     MB31 101 movement
2.     You may use backflush so while confirming order through CO11N auto GR is posted
3.     In case of repetitive manufacturing scenario generally GR is done by MFBF transaction
Regards,
Anand Rao

Stock transport order between storage locations and assignment category type E not in MRP

Hello Gurus,
I have a stock transport order between 2 storage location which belongs to the same plant. Besides the stock transport order is allocated to a sales order (account assigment category E). When I run the MD03, the system take into account the quantity of the stock transport order as a future entry and this is wrong. I need that the MRP has not into account the stock transport order as an entry.
As an important information, If I modify the stock transport order removing the account asignment category E (sales order), then the MRP doesn't take into account it, so this is correct.
Could anybody tell me how to get it?
Thanks in advanced.

Laura,
It is normal that MRP will consider an STO as a receipt element; this is basic planning. It is unclear to me why you think you do not want it to do so, but I will assume you have some logical reason.
Contrary to what some others may have suggested, changing the scope of check for availability checking has no effect on which elements are considered for MRP. MRP is a completely separate functionality from Availability Check.
For Location > Location STOs (within a plant), then, you normally have the receipt element of the STO in the destination storage location, and the requirements element of an equal amount in the source storage location. Net of these two elements is zero, unless you have already issued the STO at the source location.
Changing the Account assignment from "E" means that the STO will not be relevant for your Sales order (in other words, when you receive this STO into the destination storage location, it cannot be used for your sales order). In a general MTO scenario, it also means that the proceeds of this STO (the stock you received) cannot be used for ANY sales orders.
One way that some people make an STO 'not relevant' for MRP is to alter the destination storage location such that it is not relevant for MRP. You can change the MRP relevancy of the storage location in MM02 > MRP4 tab
Best Regards,
DB49

Creating new inspection lot origin via SPRO

Hi guys.
I would like to know how to create new inspection lot origin via SPRO.
I tried going via SPRO->Quality Management->Quality Inspection->Inspection Lot Creation->Maintain Inspection Lot Origins and Assign Inspection types , but could not find the way.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
You should 1st create/define the inspection types in OQL1 for your needs then you should assign them to locations.
Have you defined your inspection types?
Check n revert
Shiva

Inspection lot with inspection type 03 - Using Inspection plan

Dear friends,
I want to create an inspection lot at the time of production order release (ideally - insp type 03). But I want to use inspection plan as a task list instead of routing for that lot.
Is it possible?
Best Regards,
Avinash

Hi Swapnali,
Was expecting this re-question.
We are at a stage where system is already ready. The routing master data contains large number of alternatives and huge number of parallel sequences. We were looking for a solution in which we would make an inspection plan without touching routing master data. Second I want to create the lot at the time of order release (basically one lot per production order) so don't want to use insp type 04.
In config, I assigned task list type Q in front of lot origin 03 (Maintain Inspection Lot Origins and Assign Inspection Types).
But still system is picking the routing and not inspection plan. Is there a way out?
Regards,
Avinash

Inspection lot origin don't work in COA

Hello All,
I have created a COA Profile (QC01), Where in I have assign inspection type 89 in the field "Insp.lot origin" and "Inspection Type". Now as per the F1 help suggest I am expecting that system will not allow me to print COA for those lots don't belongs to inspection type 89, but surprisingly it allows to take print out for inspection lot origins for 01, 08 types also.
I am using the STD COA form "QM_QCERT_01"
Taking print from QC21
Pls let me know what and/or where I am missing something!!!!!!!
Regards,
SAPier

Dear,
SPRO > QM > Quality Certificates > Certificate Profile > Define Certificate Types
SPRO > QM > Quality Certificates > Output Determination > Define Condition Types for Output Determination
Standard is Form QM_QCERT_01 you will get it in SE71.
Logistics > Quality Management > Quality Certificate > Outgoing > Certificate Profile (QC01
COA is printed in QC20.
Also refer this nice article by Expert Gajesh,
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/9002247f-4b7f-2c10-10ac-c6fe29807331?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
Hope it will help you.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Runtime error and I/O device error

Im having problems with my toshiba laptop. When it starts up a message appears saying runtime error you can only click OK and it goes away, does anyone have any idea about this?
I also cant put software off a cd-rom onto my laptop as a message saying not accessible, I/O device error comes up when you click the cd drive.
I am useless with computers and dont know what to do!

Hi Kat
Can you please tell us which notebook model you have and since when this problem occur?
Is the DVD drive exchanged or is there some other important info that can help us?
By the way: check please this article http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=891894
Good luck!

Runtime Error during export ALV Grid to Local File and Print Priview

Hi all,
         While Exporting ALV grid to local file using menu List->export->local file , I m getting following runtime error,
         Field Symbol has not yet been assigned.
Details of Errors:
Program : SAPLKKBL
Include :   LKKBLF99
Module Type : (FORM)
module name : GEN_FIELD_OUT2
So. pls Suggest any good solution.
Thanks & Regards,
Sandip Sonar.

hi
this is happening just because you might have declared that your ALV list should have a checkbox, but defined no field as "checkbox" into your internal table.
and one more thing to check up is that before you call the REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY, you need to fill a few parameters for instance is_layout. This one has a field box_fieldname, in which you have to enter the name of the field of the internal table that will store the 'X' as and when the checkbox is checked.
hope this helps
regards
Aakash Banga

Runtime error at maintain insp lot origins and assign inspection types

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for