RV042 Dual WAN NSD Failback

Running a RV042 in Smart Link with NSD Mode
WAN1: Cable Internet to ISP
WAN2: DSL Internet to backup ISP
WAN1 is set as the primary WAN.
With both links up, when I pull the plug on WAN1, it failsover to WAN2 in the expected amount of time and resumes internet traffic.
When I plug WAN1 back in though, the service doesn't automatically fail back to the Preferred WAN1 Connection, no matter how long I wait.
Advice?
Thanks!

I've used it for two different ASNs all the time.  Yes, you will have problems with SSL logins or any logins that check the source IP, but that can be easily fixed with some entries under the protocol binding.
There's no real protocol being used for the load balance.  Just a weighted round-robin based on the bandwidth information you enter for each of the WANs.
Huntsville's Premiere Car and Bike e-magazine: www.huntsvillecarscene.com

Similar Messages

  • Cisco RV042 - Dual Wan Load Balancing - Secure Site (HTTPS) Trouble

    PID VID :
    RV042 V03
    Firmware Version :
    v4.0.0.07-tm (Aug 19 2010 19:19:50)
    Ever since I setup my RV042 with load balancing using the Dual Wan system I have had trouble staying connected to some secure sites. After doing some searching I found that the potential issue is the IP change mid session.
    "http://www.broadbandreports.com/forum/r25537589-Cisco-RV042-can-not-use-load-balancing-for-some-web-sites"
    Although my interface is significantly different I was able to find the same area in my RV042 admin area however, it doesn't seem to work.
    System Management
    > Dual Wan
    In Wan 1 & Wan 2 I have HTTPS and HTTPS Secondary all forwarded to use Wan 2 under Protocol Binding
    This however has not managed to do anything at all for my network and every computer conneceted experiences the same HTTPS irregularities at some websites.
    I'm sure I must be doing something wrong, but I don't know what it is.
    Both incoming connections are from the same service provider although the plans are different.
    Any help with this would greatly help me stop losing my mind trying to fight with my website control panel for 10 minutes to just login and get something done.
    Thanks

    Any ideas or advice from anyone?

  • Rv042 dual-wan threshold based load balance?

    I have an RV042 (it's old, silver/dark grey plastic front one) w/ firmware 1.3.13.02-tm.
    The reason we bought this (long ago) was to balance two WAN connections, one with unlimited data and one capped monthly.  It did that once, but for a couple years both connections have been unmetered so it's just been balancing them 50/50.  As of today one WAN connection (the new much faster one) is back to being metered but I can't figure out how to configure the RV042 as it once was to prefer sending traffic over the slow, unmetered connection first, and only use the faster metered connection when necessary.
    It's been a long time and honestly I only vaguely remember the ability to prioritize a connection based on % of bandwidth used so that all traffic would go over the unlimited connection 1st until it was flooded, and only then fall over to the metered connection.  This is totally different than the weighted round robin, or smart link backup.
    I found this 3rdparty pforum post that supports that vauge memory and suggests this was eliminated netweem firmware 1.23 and 1.3:
    http://www.linksysinfo.org/index.php?threads/rv042-load-balancing-options-from-the-manual-where-to-find.15512/#post-69948
    So I humlbly ask...  Is it possible to replicate this functionality with the current firmware? if so how?  If not, how to do roll back to firmware 1.23?
    It sounded like perhaps I could assigned WAN1 a bandwidth of 100000 (even though it's really 1500) and then assign WAN2 a bandwidth of 1 (even though it's really 20000) and the result might be the prioritization I'm looking to achieve...  but I feel like I'm stumbling in the dark at the point.
    Just FYI, I'm not at all opposed to buying new hardware to acheive this if it's not terribly expensive (ie. <$200).  I'd rather not, but I've got to solve this quick.

    Hi Jon,
    I Also have one of these routers.
    On the bottom mine says (v02) which means its hardware version is 2.
    I just got this one brand new for home as I have been using them for a very long time now. However I have been using them for VPN and now I am needing the same functionality as you.
    I am currently running Firmware Version: 1.3.12.19-tm
    If you login to the web management (eg 192.168.1.1) and go to System Management > Dual-WAN
    Down the bottom you will see "Protocol Binding".
    This is all I know of to send specific ports or applications via a specific WAN.
    I'll give you an example of how I am using it currently.. (BTW it seems to be working OK, But you are on a higher firmware)
    eg: WAN1 is more reliable than WAN2 which is a cheap unlimited service.
    So I bind port 5060 (sip), port 80 (http) and port 443 (https) to WAN1 so that my VOIP phone is on the good service and so is all web traffic.
    so all the other stuff can use the unlimited connection.
    Also, My current bandwidth settings are
    WAN          UPSTREAM          DOWNSTREAM
    1                384                       8000
    2                384                       10000
    And Under: System Management > Bandwidth Management you can also prioritize those ports.
    This may help you in some way, So maybe you can help me..
    Your post has made me not want to upgrade the firmware.. Can you please confirm that this functionality exists still?
    Thanks

  • RV042 Dual WAN access rules

    New RV042 router with latest Firmware update installed.
    Two restaurants on the same LAN subnet, one POS terminal PC at each restaurant for on-line resrvation system.
    LAN connection allows each restaurant to view reservations for the other.
    Comcast  ISP with Static IPs and Comcast/SMC gateway in bridge mode (Comcast Gateway WAN IP = 50.###.###.134, LAN IP = 192.168.10.1).
    LAN port 1 on Comcast Gateway connected to WAN1 on RV042 (WAN1 IP = 50.###.###.133).
    LAN port 2 on Comcast Gateway connected to WAN2 on RV042 (WAN2 IP = 50.###.###.132).
    RV042 LAN IP = 10.1.10.1.
    Restaurant A POS PC IP - 10.1.10.201 (static).
    Restaurant B POS PC IP - 10.1.10.202 (static).
    OpenTable online reservation system needs 5 inbound port ranges forwarded to each terminal PC for the OpenTable interface.
    For Restaurant A OpenTable sends to 50.###.###.133.
    For Restaurant B OpenTable sends to 50.###.###.132.
    We setup RV042 Firewall "Access Rules" specifying the appropriate source interface (WAN1/WAN2) with source set to ANY and the appropriate destination (10.1.10.201/10.1.10.202) for the 5 port ranges (so 10 rules in all, 5 per restaurant)
    However this is not working for either restaurant.
    OpenTable cannot interface with the termianl PCs on the specified ports.
    If we add the port range forwarding under the "Forwarding" section of the RV042 setup (which limits us to seting it up for only one of the restaurants) the OpenTable interface works for the one restaurant.
    What are we missing????

    David,
    I pretty sure on this model router we can't specify the inbound port address to be forwarded from specified WAN port (it's catch all). It doesn't give us the ability to choose this in port forwarding or Upnp forward. Now if you can separate the ranges that needs to be forward to each server say SERVER 1 1000-1005 and ports 1006-1010 to SERVER 2.
    if you are needed to specify which wan port on your fowarding then you'll need to move up to a different router.
    SA520,SA520W or SA540
    Jasbryan

  • Linksys RV042 Dual Wan with Load Balancing Help?

    Good day,
    I'm a newbie to routers.  I have purchased a Linksys RV042 hoping I could connect my two modem and provide internet to my collegues in the camp.  My internet connection is running under EAP-TLS using a Motorola modem from Go Telecom here in Saudi Arabia.  Need help to configure the router to accept the two modem.
    Thanks for the reply.....

    Hello David,
    Glad you could spend some time with my problem.  Tried the solution you sent but still unsuccesful to connect to internet.  Is there something wrong with the WAN credentials I'm using?  Do I have to switch the mode from Gateway to Router?  Please take a look at my WAN1 values that I wrote in the RV042
    I am using a Motorola CPE outdoor Wimax modem from GO Telacom here in Saudi Arabia...

  • RV042 dual VPN connections between locations with load balance

    We currently have three remote offices connected to the main office with gateway to gateway VPN's over DSL lines and everything is working fine. All offices have an RV042 with current firmware. We have added a second DSL line at every location and want to add a second VPN tunnel on WAN2 from the remote offices to the main office and load balance those. Load balance to the internet with the new lines works OK but the issue is that I can't create a second tunnel on WAN2 with the same network addresses as the existing tunnel on WAN1. It seems like this would be a pretty common thing with a dual WAN router but I'm not having much luck figuring it out. Does anybody know of a way to do what we're trying to do?

    Hi,
    WHile all the RV series Routers provide Dual WAN capability:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps9923/products_qanda_item09186a0080a33b64.shtml
    Only thr RV082 allows the backup tunnel.  The implementation on the RV082 is not to  create a new, separate tunnel using the backup WAN. Instead, the VPN GUI exposes an  Advanced tab for the primary tunnel, and you complete the fields in the GUI using the backup WAN IP addresses.   I am pretty sure this is not offered on the RV042.  It wasnt last I check, but check your GUI for the above.  If its not there, then you cant do it.
    Steve DiStefano
    Systems Engineer
    US Field Channel Sales

  • Simplest dual-WAN setup for LRT224 ?

    Hi folks
    Hope someone can help with some insight / advice here.
    First, some background :
    For a while I’ve been using a conventional ADSL modem-router device to connect to my primary ISP, and thereby provide internet connectivity to a number of desktop PCs, laptops and other mobile devices in a small office environment. I plug the “output” (LAN port) of the ADSL modem-router into a switch, and I also plug a dual-band wireless access point (WAP) into the switch to provide wireless access for the mobile devices. Generally this all works fine.
    One problem of course is that if/when my ISP goes down - which does happen occasionally - I have no internet. Also, I am starting to need extra bandwidth, and ADSL connectivity has pretty much reached its speed ceiling in my area. So I’ve been looking at ways of providing redundancy and higher speed by having multiple connections, possibly with different technologies and different ISPs. One option is to go with multiple ADSL connections; another (perhaps better) option is to go with a high-speed fixed-wireless (LTE) connection. With LTE, I can easily get over 30Mbps, so I’ve gone with that option for now. FTTH may be an option on the future. Obviously I needed a 2- or 3-WAN router device to do the connection management.
    I had a preference for a dual-WAN router that isn’t tied to any particular communication technology (like ADSL, or VDSL) to give a degree of future-proofing for new technologies like FTTH. I prefer modem devices that have a conventional ethernet port as an output, and hence router devices that have ethernet ports for WAN inputs. This eliminates “combined” devices like Draytek’s “Vigor” ADSL+WAN modem-routers, or routers that have provision to connect a USB 3G stick modem for failover. 
    While shopping around, I looked at options like the Cisco RV042/043, the Peplink Balance 20/30, and the Belkin/Linksys LRT224. The LRT224 seemed to offer a reasonable compromise between price, features and performance, so I went with it.
    Both my CPE devices are combined modem-routers that completely manage the connection to their respective ISPs, presenting me simply with an ethernet port (or ports) for connection to my local LAN. Specifically, I’m using a D-Link DSL-2500U ADSL modem (1 LAN port) and a Huawei B593s-601 LTE modem (4 LAN ports). Both include the usual functions such as DHCP server, NAT, firewall etc. Previously I’d always give the ADSL modem a fixed IP, and then it let it handle DHCP for the whole of the downstream network. So far, so good.
    My requirements for now are pretty straightforward :
    - Simple failover operation, ie if one ISP (WAN) goes down, the router should transparently and quickly re-route traffic to the other ISP.
    - Load-balancing, ie the ability to apportion traffic between the two ISPs according to a number of different algorithms. Ideally I would want to see options like : equal traffic (bytes) per ISP, % traffic split (eg 60:40), pro-rata split based on connection speed or latency, etc etc ..
    - Ability to log into the ‘Web control panel for any of the three devices (LTE modem, ADSL mode, or dual-WAN router) directly from the office LAN without unplugging or re-cabling anything.
    - I've no need to use the VPN functionality on the LRT224 at the moment, though that might come later.
    Here’s where I need some input and help :
    So far, the only way I’ve been able to get this all to work together is as follows :
    1) Set up the ADSL modem with a fixed IP of 192.168.1.1 and let it do DHCP on a range like 192.168.1.50/149.
    2) Set up the LTE modem with a fixed IP of 192.168.2.1 and let it do DHCP on a range like 192.168.2.50/149.
    3) Set up the LRT224 to get WAN-side IP’s from the upstream devices on both WAN1 and WAN2.
    4) Set the LRT224 in “Gateway” mode.
    5) Set up the LRT224 with a fixed IP of 192.168.0.1, and to issue downstream DHCP IP addresses in the range 192.168.0.50/149.
     What I've noticed in trying to get this all to work is the following:
    6) This only works (and gives visibility of all 3 devices) when the two modem devices are on different subnets (like 192.168.1.x and 192.168.2.x). Trying to put them both on the same subnet as the downstream side (all on 192.168.0.x) just doesn't work, or one device is not visible.
    7) This only works with the LRT224 in "Gateway" mode, even though "Router" mode seems more fitting.
    The setup given above (1 through 5) does work, and gives a situation like the following :
    Failover works OK, and I can see any of the three edvices from the office LAN by connecting to any of the assigned IPs.
    However, the problem is that the throughput really sucks.
    If I connect the LTE modem (only) direct into the office LAN, I get in excess of 20Mbps downlink speed. However, when connecting via the LRT224, I don't even get half that speed, even if the LRT224 is in simple failover mode and the ADSL modem is turned off or out of the picture.
    Given that the LRT224 isn't "processing" the packets at all, and there's no VPN overhead, I find it hard to understand why it sucks up over 50% of the throughput. Also, the reviews I read on the LRT224 listed throughputs in the hundreds of Mbps, so this really shouldn't even be a factor. Also, having the LRT224 eat half the throughput partly defeats the one object (higher speed).
    So my question is : Is the above setup really the way to do what I want ? Or is there a better way ? The upstream arrangements with dual DHCP on different subnets seems overly complex. Is there a simpler way with PPoE, or PPTP, etc ?
    What might I be doing wrong ?
    Any input or advice would be much appreciated.
    Thanks

    Thanks for the suggestions, guys; although I've pretty much covered all of those things.
    For info :
    1) The router came with firmware v1.0.0.9 (Nov 25, 2013 - the initial release), but I have updated it to the latest v1.0.2.06 (Mar 28, 2014). (This is the third release in 4 months, so it seems Linksys is working fairly actively on LRT2x4 firmware).
    2) I have the "Maximum Bandwidth" figures (reached at Configuration / System Management / Bandwidth Management) set to the appropriate values, including a maximum downstream value of 61 440kbps (60Mbps) for the WAN port to which the LTE modem is connected. My understanding, though, is that the LRT224 doesn't DO anything with this information unless there are one or more bandwidth management policies set. (My understanding may be wrong, and the manual isn't much help). I have no bandwidth management policies set.
    3) I did try disabling all of the firewall rules as suggested by Flybyknight - no improvement.
    One interesting (and unintended / undesired) consequence of my setup is that I can only "see" the configuration pages (web interfaces) for both upstream modems (ADSL and LTE) when the router is in "Load Balance" mode. If it is in "Failover" mode and the primary WAN is up, then I can't see the modem on the secondary (failover) WAN. I assume this is because traffic is only being routed to the active WAN port.
    I guess my uncertainty is more about the upstream setup, ie the way in which the upsream-facing WAN ports on the LRT are configured to talk to the downstream-facing LAN ports on the respective modems.
    The user guide for the LRT224 is really poor, unfortunately. It doesn't explain the actual workings of the various features at all. For instance, it does not explain what the ACTUAL working of "load balance" is. Does the device route the same amount of traffic (bytes) to both WAN ports, or does it do so in proportion to their configured speeds ? Proper explanations for these features are really indispensable! Belkin/Linksys, are you listening ??

  • ASA 5505 Dual WAN - Ping inactive wan from outside?

    I currently have some small branch offices using ASA 5505 with Security Plus license and dual wan connections. They are configured wil an sla monitor so if the primary WAN goes down the secondary connection becomes active. This works as expected, however...
    I can't ping the non-active interface from an outside source. I beleive this is by design or due to some limitation on the 5505. The problem is that I don't know if the backup WAN connection is functioning normally without forcing the ASA to make it active. We use a flaky wireless connection for the backups. The problem recently bit me because both WAN connections were offline.
    I'm looking for an easy way to monitor the inactive wan interface, preferably by pinging from an outside location. Is this possible?

    Hello,
    This wont work because the ASA receives the ping on the backup link but has the default route pointing to the outside.
    You would have to add a more spefic route for your IP.
    Example:
    If you want to ping coming from IP 1.1.1.1
    route outside 0 0 x.x.1.1 1 track 1
    route backup 0 0 x.x.2.2 250
    route backup 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 x.x.2.2
    Regards,
    Felipe.
    Remember to rate useful posts.

  • Dual Wan and port routing

    Hi,
    I am setting up a configuration with SA520W and 2 Wan, in load balancing. But I face a problem that I could not understand.
    Traffic is HTTP, SIP and 2 servers.
    Servers are for a VPN tunnel and a mail server with ActiveSync
    Both services absolutely need port 443 on the external IP, and that's one of the dual wan reason.
    The 2 wan are running, load balancing mode is enable and NAt routing in firewall tab as follow :
    443  Enabled     WAN     LAN     ALU_OpenVPN     ALLOW always     Any         192.168.0.150     WAN1     Always    
    443   Enabled     WAN     LAN     ActiveSync     ALLOW always     Any         192.168.0.254     WAN2     Always 
    If load balanced
    Port 443 is NOT routed from wan1 to 192.168.0.150
    Port 443 is routed from wan2 to 192.168.0.254
    If only WAN 1
    Port 443 is routed  from wan1 to 192.168.0.150
    If only WAN 2
    Port 443 is routed  from wan2 to 192.168.0.254
    In fact I did other testing and no port routing with WAN1 when load balancing is enable, even on port that is not used at all on Wan2.
    With a FTP filezilla server, it's OK if on wan2, and it stop before logging if on a wan1 (on laod balancing, ok on both case if only one wan)
    Firmware : latest 2.1.18
    Any Clue ??

    Hello,
    I confirm, there is a strange behaviour.
    Simple test :
    Dual Wan configured.
    A FTP server on the LAN (192.168.0.254) port 21
    Firewall , ipv4 config :
    WAN   to   LAN     FTP     ALLOW always     Any         192.168.0.254     WAN1
    WAN   to   LAN     FTP     ALLOW always     Any         192.168.0.254     WAN2
    Then some testing using a FTP client outside the LAN, connection from Internet.
    Then, changing ONLY the Wan Mode :
    1/ Use only single WAN port : Dedicated WAN
    ==> FTP connect through WAN1
    2/ Use only single WAN port : Optional WAN
    ==>FTP connect through WAN2
    3/ Load Balancing
    ==>FTP connect through WAN1
    ==>FTP DO NOT connect through WAN1
    Is that a bug or do I have some strange stuff somewhere ?
    I will pick up another SA520W from stock, brand new, update the firmware, configure the 2 WAN (invering the 2 provider just in case) and do the same test.

  • VPN and a Dual Wan router confusion

    I am running a Border Manager 3.9 server with a Dual Wan router supplying the 2 ISPs load balancing to a single NIC on the Border Manager Server. I want to try setting up a VPN.
    Whats the easiest most pain free way of doing this?
    Just wondering,
    [email protected]

    In article <[email protected]>, Rlmillies wrote:
    > Whats the easiest most pain free way of doing this?
    >
    Hah! Well, inbound traffic in general can be problematical on a
    dual-wan system.
    Here you have two issues, if the router is like ones I've worked on.
    First, load balancing. You can't (probably - this is based on my
    experience) set up a static NAT of one of the public IP addresses to
    the BM 'public' address and still load balance. My experience is that
    as soon as you do that, it forces both inbound and outbound traffic
    onto that particular WAN link, so it kills load balancing/failover.
    Which means you need to do port forwarding on the router for all the
    VPN ports. You will need TCP and UPD 353, and UPD 500 and 4500 inbound
    (and replies outbound). If using a site-site VPN, you also need TCP
    213 inbound.
    You will have to configure the VPN address in BMgr to use one of the
    WAN public IP's. The VPN will only work on that one WAN link.
    Craig Johnson
    Novell Support Connection SysOp
    *** For a current patch list, tips, handy files and books on
    BorderManager, go to http://www.craigjconsulting.com ***

  • Trend Micro Dual WAN Issue

    Question from a partner:
    Has Trend fixed the hosted issue with two WAN connections?  It used to be that even though your device had dual WANs, Trend would only forward the emails to one of the connections.  If it went down, you had to submit an email request to move it to the other connection and it could be 12-24 hours before it went into effect and 99 times out of 100, the original WAN port would be back online.  It does slightly defeat the purpose of having Dual WANs if you cannot receive email in this day and age.
    Any help out there?
    Art

    I got with Trend on this because I thought it was something very interesting....
    here is what they said...
    I think  you’re talking about the same setup as a customer having 2 mail servers, right?  If so we have had a solution for this for a while.
    They  want us to send email to 1.1.1.1, but if that is down, send it to  2.2.2.2.
    They  would use the MX record method.
    A  customer would need to create a hostname that points to two MX  records.
    Give the  primary site IN MX 10 and the backup IN MX 20.
    Then we  change the IMHS configuration to use the hostname they  created.
    >cat  imhs.multiple.customer.mailservers
    Hello,
    Our  postfix servers will only allow us to configure 1 IP address or 1 hostname in  our transport file to deliver email back to the customer.  If the customer has 2  or more mail servers they want us to use, they will need to create a new  hostname DNS entry and point it to their multiple servers.
    If they  want our servers to try to deliver the email to their mail servers in a specific  order, say mailserver1 and if that server is not available then try to deliver  the email to the mailserver2, then they would need to setup the following DNS  entries as an example:
    mailserver1.customerdomain.com.    IN  A  1.2.3.4
    mailserver2.customerdomain.com.    IN  A  2.3.4.5
    imhs.customerdomain.com.   IN MX 10 mailserver1.customerdomain.com.
    imhs.customerdomain.com.   IN MX 20 mailserver2.customerdomain.com.
    Then we  setup our server to deliver to  imhs.customerdomain.com.
    customerdomain.com     smtp:imhs.customerdomain.com:25
    If a  specific order is not important then they can just make imhs.customerdomain.com  point to multiple IP addresses:
    imhs.customerdomain.com.   IN A 1.2.3.4
    imhs.customerdomain.com.   IN A 1.2.3.5
    This  will make our server send an email to 1.2.3.4 and the next email to 1.2.3.5,  then to 1.2.3.4, etc.
    Then we  setup our server to deliver to  imhs.customerdomain.com.
    customerdomain.com     smtp:[imhs.customerdomain.com]:25
    Our  servers will only deliver the email to the first server that will accept the  email.  They will not deliver the same email to both mail  servers.
    I hope  that is detail enough,
    Regards,
    Nosa

  • Dual WAN and Log mail SMTP on RV082 ?

    I use a RV082 with dual Wan and I cannot configure two SMTP.
    Without authentication; a SMTP is specific of the provider.
    When WAN1 comes down, SMTP to be used is the SMTP corresponding to WAN2 and vice versa.
    Implementation of authentication with the mail server wil be useful.
    Possibility of two mail servers with indication of the corresponding WAN is also useful.

    I don't know how or if it's possible to set up two SMTP servers, but I know that may ISPs block SMTP traffic that is not directed to one of their SMTP servers.  You could try picking just one SMTP server, and find out if it can be conacted on a non-standard port.  A lot of SMTP providers allow for this.
    If you can configure a single SMTP server on a non-standard port, you should be able to conatct that SMTP server from anywhere on the internet because the traffic won't be blocked (at least not port-based blocking, which is what most ISPs use).
    So in a scenario where WAN1 is the ISP who owns the SMTP server and WAN2 is a diferent ISP that blocks standard SMTP traffic...
    1) If both WANs are working, SMTP traffic goes out WAN1.  No problem.
    2) If only WAN1 is working, SMTP traffic goes out WAN1.  No problem.
    3) If only WAN2 is working, SMTP traffic goes out WAN2, but is not blocked because it is on a non-standard port.  No problem.
    I hope that helps.

  • Lrt224 dual wan router

    Hi im new in dual wan setup. Please help.
    Heres my problem
    Wan 1 dynamic globe telecom primary
    Wan 2 static pldt telecom
    Link failover mode
    1 router is plug in to lrt224 to serve wifi and my switch also plugin to the wireless wifi
    1 cctv dvr connected to lrt224 port 9000 webport 9100 with auto detect settings setup
    Now:
    Sometime cctv camera broadcast to public ip when switch to wan2 but sometimes cant show also
    Same way around with dynamic wan 1 as primary
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Thanks Guys, its a big help.......

  • RV325 Dual WAN Router - Use only one IP

    I have a rv325 dual wan router. I have setup load balancing on the router, but I don't want one of the servers here being load balanced. How do i set it to only use a specific WAN while everything else is load balanced?

    Michael,
    I like to share link that will has a step by step screenshots on how to configure protocol binding. Your source ip will be server and Destination is whichever WAN you are shaping that traffic. Hope this helps
    Article ID: 4242
    http://sbkb.cisco.com 

  • Cisco RV320 DUAL WAN router USB setup with Telstra 4G MF823

    I am trying to setup Cisco RV320 DUAL WAN router to work with my prepaid Telstra 4G MF823 device. Could you please assist. My settings are as follows: InterfaceUSB2Connection Type:3G/4G PIN Code:Confirm PIN Code:USB Connection Status:3G/4G modem is not available.Access Point Name:telstra.internetDial Number:Username:Password:Enable DNSDNS Server (Required): 8.8.8.8DNS Server (Optional): 8.8.4.4MTU:AutoManualB

    Hi oz000,
    Unfortunately we don't have anyone here to assist with this particular issue. Our team here provides assistance for the device standalone, we ensure that the 4G device connects to the network and functions correctly on its own.
    -Matt W
     

Maybe you are looking for