RV042 router multiple WAN IPS assigned to different LAN IPs range

I would like to have multiple WAN IPS and assigned them to different LAN IPs. If i used the option One-to-One NAT its give me only the LAN IP 192.168.1.xxx . There is an option to specify more than one LAN IPs but its not possible to forward ports to these extra LAN IPS or to setup rules.
Is there anyway to mange this with this router. IF not what is router that will meet my requirements?

Andreas,
Unfortunately what your wanting to do will not work with the rv042. It will only allow the one to one nat rules to be applied to the default lan subnet.
You will have to use the sa500 series router which will let you do ip aliases to different lan subnet addresses.

Similar Messages

SRP547W, How to use multiple WAN IPs for port forwarding?

Hi folks,
We've run into some difficulty trying to take advantage of multiple WAN IPs in conjunction with the SRP547, and I'm hoping someone here can help out or at least tell us that we're going to need to buy a different router...
What we're trying to acheive is the ability to port forward from our distinct public IPs to different internal servers. Looking at the options under Port Forwarding it looks like we can only configure forwards at the "WAN interface" level, but our problem is that we can't work out how to set up separate interfaces for each of our Public IPs...
Our ISP provides us with a fully managed NTU/router with a single "Internet" ethernet port, which we can use by statically configuring IPs on our end. For this configuration this port has been directly patched to the WAN ethernet port on the SRP547W.
We have been allocated a 255.255.255.248 (/29) subnet, giving us 5 usable IPs after the ISP's gateway address is taken into account, like so:
a.b.c.208     Network Address (/29 subnet)
a.b.c.209     ISP Gateway
a.b.c.210     IP1
a.b.c.211     IP2
a.b.c.212     IP3
a.b.c.213     IP4
a.b.c.214     IP5
a.b.c.215     Broadcast Address
On the SRP we've set up the default "Ethernet WAN2" sub-interface with the following details for IP1
VLAN ID:               4088 (Uneditable)
Connection Type:       Static IP
Internet IP Address:   a.b.c.210
Subnet Mask:           255.255.255.248
Default Gateway:       a.b.c.209
The next step (I would have thought) would be to add a second sub-interface, using similar info for IP2
VLAN ID:               4000 (Chosen arbitrarily)
Connection Type:       Static IP
Internet IP Address:   a.b.c.211
Subnet Mask:           255.255.255.248
Default Gateway:       a.b.c.209
When we try to do so however we get:
Fail!
Conflict with Ether_WAN2 interface address type
I should mention at this point that we're running on firmware version 1.02.01 (023).
Any suggestions on how we can proceed?
Is there a CLI or other method of configuration that might work if the web interface won't?
Thanks,
Tim.

OK, I've seen reference to this solution before but not much in the way of details. Perhaps you can spell out how this ought to work, as the Software DMZ doesn't behave as I'd expected it to.
As before, on the SRP we've set up the default "Ethernet WAN2" sub-interface with the details for IP1 with a /29 subnet.
VLAN ID:               4088 (Uneditable)
Connection Type:       Static IP
Internet IP Address:   a.b.c.210
Subnet Mask:           255.255.255.248
Default Gateway:       a.b.c.209
We'd now like to expose a server function on IP2, let's say LAN details for this server are:
VLAN:                  3000
VLAN IP Range:         192.168.1.1/24
Server IP:             192.168.1.10
Server Port:           80
So first we turn on Software DMZ:
Status:                Enabled
Public IP:             a.b.c.211
Private IP:            192.168.1.10
WAN Interface:         Ether_WAN2
My understanding, based on what you've said, is that this should expose the whole server to external access via IP2. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to work this way - we don't seem to have any access at all. Perhaps there's a default deny rule on the firewall?
Just to be sure, I tried creating a rule to allow HTTP traffic to the server in the Advanced Firewall page.
In Interface (WAN):    All
Out Interface (LAN):   VLAN.3000
Source IP:             0.0.0.0
Source Subnet:         0.0.0.0
Destination IP:        192.168.1.10
Destination Subnet:    255.255.255.255
Protocol:              TCP
Source Port:           Any
Destination Port:      Single:80
Action:                Permit
Schedule:              Everyday
Times:                 24 Hours
Still no dice. What am I missing?
Cheers,
Tim.

RV220W - port redirection/access rules with multiple WAN IPs

I've just installed a Cisco RV220W - which works fine for outbound traffic, however for inbound it seems unable to work with multiple WAN IPs.
We have a block of 6 WAN IPs assigned to us by our ISP, and I want to make use of all of them to expose certain ports on our servers to the outside world.
I've tried to do this with Access Rules (using HTTP as an example) with the following settings:
Connection Type: Inbound (WAN (Internet) > LAN (Local Network))
Action: Always Allow
Service: HTTP
Source IP: Single Address
Start: <one of the WAN IPs>
Send to Local Server (DNAT IP): <IP of the internal server>
Use Other WAN (Internet) IP Address: disabled
Rule Status: Enabled
Yet the server/port remains inaccessible.
I've tried:
rebooting the server with a power off/on again
implementing the same settings in port forwarding
triple-checking all IP addresses being used
The only way I've got it working is by changing the access rule so that it applies to any source address rather than one specific one... however that's not a solution for us as we need to use specific IP addresses for specific internal servers/ports.
The router's admin interface certainly suggests this should be possible, however making use of it seems to break all incoming access!
Any suggestions welcome.

You should be using "ANY" as the source IP, as you are publishing your internal server to the internet and internet means the request comes from any source IP (you don't know what it is, so it will be any.
Basically, you want any source IP to hit one of your WAN IPs on port 80, and then your firewall will redirect that request to the internal server's private IP address on same port 80. And when the response comes back from the internal server, the firewall will already have this translate entry in it so the reverse NAT will happen (you don't need configure this, it is default firewall feature).
I hope I have answered your question well.
Please mark as correct if you like the response.
Thanks

Assign multiple internal parts (materials of different plants) to one MPN

HI
I have a requirement to assign multiple internal parts (materials of different plants) to one manufacture part number.
but in HERS material type it allows to assign to only one .
can any body suggest how can I do this.
Sreeram

You can do that.
1:Assign the new plant to the sales org / distribution channel - Enterprise structure
2:DO the shipping point determination for the new plant.
3:Extend the materials to the new plant.
4:If there is intercompnay process, please check "Assignmnet of organizational units to plants" in navigation SD - Billing - Intercompany billing.
5: Check if there are any pricing records, output records....et cwhich has Plant as parameters. if yes maintain the entries for the new plant.
These are the things I could think of.
Before deleting the existing plants, make sure there are no open documents existing for these plants, else system will not allow to delete.
Regards
Sai
Edited by: Sai on Jun 1, 2010 4:19 PM

Assigning a different inspection plan to an inspection lot

Hi,
I have a situation where the incorrect inspection plan is assigned to an inspection lot. Is there any mechanism to assign a different inspection plan to an inspection lot i.e. without having to reverse a goods receipt.
Regards,

>
Shyamal Joshi wrote:
> Hi Kaushal,
>
> There are more than one reason for this error. Check the followings.
>
> - The key date for inspection lot should be later than the key date for the inspection plan, later then the date when you assigned the material to the plan.
> - The usage of lot and inspection plan should be same.
> - The status of inspection plan must be released.
>
> Regards,
> Shyamal
Why are you not checking these things I am sure the reason would be there only. If dont wana check it is your wish. Any ways best of luck

Having issues with IP Phones and the RV042 Router

Hello,
We have recently purchased Ring Central IP Phones and are having audio issues. We have a RV042 router with two WAN connections. We called Ring Central Tech support and were told that IP Phones will not work with the RV042 while loading balancing is enabled. Has anyone ever successfully setup IP Phones with a RV042 router while having loading balancing enabled? I configured the port range that the IP Phone use to be bound to WAN 1 but still having problems. Thanks in advance.
Loren

I Have the 5s but my screen keeps freezing up and I have to force restart on my apps!

One router, multiple separate dial-in VPN configs... can it be done?

I have one WAN edge (Internet) router shared by two, closely related, companies; one WAN port, two LAN ports. The companies have a different WAN public IP address then NAT into different LAN internal addresses.
Is there any way to configure dialin PPTP VPN with different parameters depending on the IP address the request comes in on?
(eg: If I want to VPN to company1, I go to a certain IP address, and If I want to VPN to company2, I go to a certain different IP address.)
Basically, both companies want people to VPN in (using the standard Microsoft VPN client), but authentication will be done with different RADIUS (IAS) servers and the VPN clients will need to their IP addresses from different pools.
Is this possible?
Is it possible if I use a different VPN client (eg: Cisco VPN client?)

You can use the IOS feature reliable static route using object tracking to detect the Metro trunk failure and force the ISDN backup to takeover the routing using a floating static route.
Check out this link for more information and configuration steps.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3/12_3x/12_3xe/feature/guide/dbackupx.html
HTH
Sundar

Issue in Configuring Linksys RV042 router

Hi,
I am facing some issues in configuring the Linksys RV042 router with dual WAN configuration. We are having two internet connection and I want to perform the "Load balancing" between the two internet connections. I have followed the RV042 manual and configured the router.
But while using the Linksys RV042 for load balancing the "Outlook 2007" and "MSN" are frequently disconnecting in the client machines. We could not use the Linksys RV042 router because of this issue.
We are using the "Static IP" for the two internet connection and configured with manual. We are facing issue only in "Outlook" and "MSN" but I can browse the sites without any issues.
Is there any configurtaions needed? Please help us to get the solution in this issue.
If you need any more details please mail me @ [email protected]
Thanks in Advance,
R. Manikandan.

R. Manikandan,
Without knowing more about your configuration, and the reason for "Outlook" and "MSN" disconnecting. I would suggest that you look at the following documentation for setting up "Dual WAN" on the RV042.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps9923/products_qanda_item09186a0080a36632.shtml
It sounds like you may need to setup "Protocol Bindings" for your SMTP traffic to be directed out a specific WAN port.
If you continue to have issues, please let us know.
Darren

Request/task is assigned to different client in Charm

Hi All,
We did a change in the transport route, just adding a new transport group in the existing transport route. The Project consistency and everything looks fine.
But, we are facing an issue while creating a Transport of copies for an normal change. when i check the application Log it says "request/task XXXXXXXX is assigned to different client Charm".
When i check that particular TOC in a satellite system, there is no proper owner name available and it took SMTMCSP system user. Also, the Target system is empty. Please help us to fix this issue.
Regards,
Prabhushankar B

Hi Pavan,
This is the standard behavior for the 'Normal Corrections'. They work under the philosophy of 'Release Mgt' where all normal corrections move to production together as part of the release.
If you want changes to move independently, you should work with Urgnt Corrections. They have their own tasklist. But please note the urgnts are re-imported with the maintenance cycle when it is moved to go-live phase and imported.
Thanks & Regards,
Kriti Bhalla

OXK3 Assign a different package to the object

Dear all,
I trired to create a field in OXK3, but the system returns:
"Assign a different package to the object
Message no. TK810"
I have already tested with different package but it still not correct.
Regards,
Kit

Hi Kit,
Take a look at [Note 761040|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/761040] to see if the solution offered by SAP for this situation will work in your case. Here is an excerpt from the Note's solution section:
First, check whether you have selected the correct development class for the table append structure and whether the transport routes are configured correctly in the Transport Management System.
The table append structure must belong to a development class which is at least transported to all target systems to which the relevant table is transported.
Best Regards,
Jamie

RV042 v3 - Block WAN Request - bad implemented!

Hello,
I would like to ask You if You have same problem as me. I would like to allow PING on RV042 from WAN side only from specific IP address, but when I set the rule, RV042 does not respond on WAN side, because Block WAN Request is Enabled.
BUT! When I disable "Block WAN Requests", now any IP can ping my router from WAN side. Although I set access rule to Deny Ping from WAN side to anyone, it still responds.
Do you know sollution?

Good morning
Thanks for using our forum
Hi Tomas Zavodny my name is Johnnatan and I am part of the Small business Support community
I'm not sure if you disable the option “Block Wan Request” your device creates a rule in the firewall, can you check this? if your device creates the rule, follow this procedure
In this priority order, create 2 rules in your firewall device.
1. A rule that allow ping your device from your specific source(s) address(es)
2A rule that deny ping from any other source.
3 With the lowest priority, the rule that your device creates.
I hope you find this answer useful, if it was satisfactory for you, please mark the question as Answered.
Please rate post you consider useful.
Greetings,
Johnnatan Rodriguez Miranda.
Cisco network support engineer.
Cisco has a very useful tool called GuideMe, is made for small business products, and your device is in this category, you can use this address for accesing the tool: http://sbkb.cisco.com/CiscoSB/Loginr.aspx?alt1 = & pid = 4 & eroute = Super, is very easy to use, just complete the 3 spaces on this way:
Select a category: (Select the device type on request), eg Routers
Enter model: (Type the model on request), eg RV042
Question: (Type what you want to know about the device), eg VPN
And it'll be showing all the information you need about what you wrote.

How can we assign a different scope of planning in MTO scenario?

Hi,
We are using MTO scenario. In this case, during sales order creation checking control AE is getting triggered. We want to use a different scenario during rescheduling transaction. But as per my analysis, V_V2 is also calling the same AE checking control eventhough we assigned a different checking control for Back order processing.
In this case, can we assign a different checking control (scope of check) for back order processing?
Regards.

Let me explain my requirement here....
This is a kind of trading or sub-contracting. Initially we will give the forecast to vendor...but Vendor will start the finished product production only after getting the confirmed order from us. Hence we thought to use strategy 50. So we will create a PO to Vendor only after getting a confirmed sales order from customer.
But in strategy 50 ATP confirmation is based on PIR. Hence we created a new requirement class (copy of 45 with ATP active). So in this new strategy ATP is against actual receipts instead of PIRs.
But sometimes Vendor may not be able to supply as per lead-time...and he may postpone the delivery date. In this case we are getting exception message 10 for the PO...even though PO is specific to a sales order. Still rescheduling job (V_V2) is not populating the new confirmation date as it is referring to the TRLT.
Hence we want to use ATP based on TRLT during sales order creation. And during rescheduling we want to use a different scope of check ('without TRLT' and with 'No storage location check'). Hence we created a new checking rule for rescheduling and this we assigned for that specific plant.
As per my observation, rescheduling job is not picking the scope of check that is assigned for rescheduling....it is calling the same checking rule AE during rescheduling also.
So my question here is... can we call a different scope of check during rescheduling run while using make to order strategy?
Regards.

HT4314 I have two ipods in my house that were set up under the same email. I have since assigned two different emails. How can I change the game center account so that is not shared by both ipods because it is for two different users and they are not ha

I have two ipods in my house that were set up under the same email. I have since assigned two different emails. How can I change the game center account so that is not shared by both ipods because it is for two different users and they are not happy?

By "game center account", do you mean Apple ID?
If so, you can change it.
1. Tap settings and navigate to iTunes and App Stores
2. Tap "Apple ID" and then tap "Sign Out"
3. Log in with a different ID.

New task assigned to user from CurrentItem:UserField using Assign task action is assigned to different user.

Hello !
I have run into "funny" problem.
I have following workflow:
User is creating item in ListA. In new form he needs to put Manager which is User Field column type. From people picker he is choosing login name Domain\jo (Two letters seems to be important here). User is resolved correctly to John Doe. Item is saved and
added to list correctly. In list view John Doe is displayed in Manager column. In view item John Doe is in Manager field. In powershell Id;#John Doe is as a Manager field value.
Now the "funny" part:
After item is added to ListA workflow is started automatically. Workflow is assigning new task to user from Manager (CurrentItem:Manager) field using Assign task action. Now the new task is assigned to different person i.e. John Dimagio with login name DOMAIN\jod
! When I am logging value to wf history of the CurrentItem:Manager field I am getting sth like i;123#DOMAIN\jod . So value is completely different and wrong.
Can someone explain why is this happening?
My guess is that using two letters login name can cause such case but why ?
Regards,

Hello !
I have run into "funny" problem.
I have following workflow:
User is creating item in ListA. In new form he needs to put Manager which is User Field column type. From people picker he is choosing login name Domain\jo (Two letters seems to be important here). User is resolved correctly to John Doe. Item is saved and
added to list correctly. In list view John Doe is displayed in Manager column. In view item John Doe is in Manager field. In powershell Id;#John Doe is as a Manager field value.
Now the "funny" part:
After item is added to ListA workflow is started automatically. Workflow is assigning new task to user from Manager (CurrentItem:Manager) field using Assign task action. Now the new task is assigned to different person i.e. John Dimagio with login name DOMAIN\jod
! When I am logging value to wf history of the CurrentItem:Manager field I am getting sth like i;123#DOMAIN\jod . So value is completely different and wrong.
Can someone explain why is this happening?
My guess is that using two letters login name can cause such case but why ?
Regards,

I've set up email on my iPad (talk mails when connected to my home router and ISP. When connected to a router at another location with a different ISP I can receive mail but not send it. Is there any way round this

I've set up email on my iPad (talktalk.net) and can send and receive mails when connected to my home router and ISP. When connected to a router at another location with a different ISP I can receive mail but not send it. Is there any way round this?

I've set up email on my iPad (talktalk.net) and can send and receive mails when connected to my home router and ISP. When connected to a router at another location with a different ISP I can receive mail but not send it. Is there any way round this?

RV042 router multiple WAN IPS assigned to different LAN IPs range

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for