RV042 - What's a practical difference between gateway and router mode

That´s my scenario, I have a RV042 as gateway  on subnet 192.168.254.0,subnet 192.168.0.0 on the same LAN and  3 vpn tunnels connected GATEWAY TO GATEWAY on subnet 192.168.1.0,192.168.2.0 and 192.168.4.0. I setup 192.168.0.0 as Multiple Subnet on RV042 so now i can ping 192.168.0.0 from RV042 but i can´t do this from clients. What i want to know is What will happen if i change RV042 mode from gateway to router and What do i do to make clients (workstations) on subnet 192.168.254.0 reach clients in subnet 192.168.0.0 .
Thx
Everyone

Gateway mode = RV042 does NAPT (network address & port translation);
Router mode = RV042 does not do NAPT

Similar Messages

  • What are the practical differences betweens infopackages and process chains

    Hi,
    what are the practical differences betweens infopackages and process chains.
    Thanks,
    cheta.

    Hello BW,
    Hope the following links will give u a clear idea about process chains
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/events/sap-teched-03/using%20process%20chains%20in%20sap%20business%20information%20warehouse
    Business Intelligence Old Forum (Read Only Archive)
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/8f/c08b3baaa59649e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/8da0cd90-0201-0010-2d9a-abab69f10045
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/19683495-0501-0010-4381-b31db6ece1e9
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/36693695-0501-0010-698a-a015c6aac9e1
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/9936e790-0201-0010-f185-89d0377639db
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/3507aa90-0201-0010-6891-d7df8c4722f7
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/263de690-0201-0010-bc9f-b65b3e7ba11c
    /people/siegfried.szameitat/blog/2006/02/26/restarting-processchains
    regards,
    Muralidhar Prasad.C

  • What are the major differences between BODS and Talend ?

    Hi Friends,
    We had a client meeting 2 days back regarding BODS project, But our client is showing more interest on Talend. We have explained/demo him on BODS.  Could any one please tell me, What are the major differences between BODS and Talend ? What are the features of BODS which are not there in TELEND ?
    Thanks,
    Bheem.

    Hi,
    If you talk difference than Talend is an open source. SAP DS as huge advantage when it comes to loading data into SAP and it is more flexible with lots of inbuilt features and easy to load data into SAP using DS directly and extracting data from various legacy systems.

  • What is the main difference between ws_upload and gui_upload?

    Hi All,
    What is the main difference between ws_upload and gui_upload?
    In what contexts should we use these two function modules??
    Thanks,
    Creasy

    search the forum before posting.
    You can find lot of posts related.

  • What is the main difference between eewb and aet tool ?

    Dear all,
    What is the main difference between eewb and aet? Both ways we can create fields and coming to aet is in crm 7.0 and eewb is in 6.0.when we are creating fields through eewb we should have technical knowledge but aet tool is a simple tool as a function people also can easily add the fields. I want to know is there any main difference between both these tools.
    Regards,
    Jemmi.

    EEWB works from SAP GUI whereas AET works from WEB UI. AET is developed on top of the EEWB. Most the Objects are supported barring a few through AET. It's a very usefull tool for SAP CRM.
    Since in CRM SAP GUI will be phased out soon, AET will be prominent. One will see lot more features in upcoming relase in AET tool.
    Regards,
    Harshit

  • What is the main difference between Enhancements and BADI.?

    What is the main difference between Enhancements and BADI.?plzz tell
    Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Feb 13, 2008 3:48 PM

    CMOD is the Project Management of SAP Enhancements (i.e., SMOD Enhancements). SMOD contains the actual enhancements and CMOD is the grouping of those SMOD enhancements.
    Difference Between BADI and User Exits
    BADI's can be used any number of times, where as USER-EXITS can be used only one time.
    Ex:- if your assigning a USER-EXIT to a project in (CMOD), then you can not assign the same to other project.
    BADI's are oops based.
    Business Add-Ins are a new SAP enhancement technique based on ABAP Objects. They can be inserted into the SAP System to accommodate user requirements too specific to be included in the standard delivery. Since specific industries often require special functions, SAP allows you to predefine these points in your software. 
    As with customer exits two different views are available:
    In the definition view, an application programmer predefines exit points in a source that allow specific industry sectors, partners, and customers to attach additional software to standard SAP source code without having to modify the original object. 
    In the implementation view, the users of Business Add-Ins can customize the logic they need or use a standard logic if one is available.
    In contrast to customer exits, Business Add-Ins no longer assume a two-level infrastructure (SAP and customer solutions), but instead allow for a multi-level system landscape (SAP, partner, and customer solutions, as well as country versions, industry solutions, and the like). Definitions and implementations of Business Add-Ins can be created at each level within such a system infrastructure.
    SAP guarantees the upward compatibility of all Business Add-In interfaces. Release upgrades do not affect enhancement calls from within the standard software nor do they affect the validity of call interfaces. You do not have to register Business Add-Ins in SSCR.
    The Business Add-In enhancement technique differentiates between enhancements that can only be implemented once and enhancements that can be used actively by any number of customers at the same time. In addition, Business Add-Ins can be defined according to filter values. This allows you to control add-in implementation and make it dependent on specific criteria (on a specific Country value, for example).
    All ABAP sources, screens, GUIs, and table interfaces created using this enhancement technique are defined in a manner that allows customers to include their own enhancements in the standard. A single Business Add-In contains all of the interfaces necessary to implement a specific task.
    The actual program code is enhanced using ABAP Objects. In order to better understand the programming techniques behind the Business Add-In enhancement concept, SAP recommends reading the section on ABAP Objects.

  • What is badi?difference between bapi and badi?

    what is badi?difference between bapi and badi?

    Hi..
    BADI is just an object-oriented version of user-exit. Instead of entering program code into some function module (as in customer-exit), you define some class which has to implement predefined methods and those methods are fired at predefined points just like an old user-exit. Some BADI can have multiple independent implementations which is much better for software deployment as several developers can implement the same BADI independently.
    To understand BAPIs, you must know that there are 2 things. One is the SAP Object Repository of the Business Object Repository (BOR) and the Function Builder.
    Now the business objects with their business processes and business data, reside in the BOR, with the corresponding BAPI. the implementation of this BAPI resides in the function builder. Any external world (non SAP) programs or legacy systems can access the business processes or data of any business object in the BOR, thru the process of invoking the BAPI implementation of the BAPI for this business object.
    Thus we can access a business object.
    So we can say that a BAPI is a process that allows third party s/w or non SAP programs to access SAP Business object data and processes.
    <REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
    Regards
    - Rishika
    Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Jun 12, 2008 5:33 PM

  • What is the main difference between menu_exits and user_exits

    what is the main difference between menu_exits and user_exits

    Hi,
    User Exits:
    A user exit is a three character code that instructs the system to access a program during system processing.
    SXX: S is for standard exits that are delivered by SAP. XX represents the 2-digit exit number.
    UXX: U is for user exits that are defined by the user. XX represents the 2-digit exit number
    Menu Exits:
    Menu exits add items to the pulldown menus in standard SAP applications. You can use these menu items to call up your own screens or to trigger entire add-on applications.
    SAP creates menu exits by defining special menu items in the Menu Painter. These special entries have function codes that begin with "+" (a plus sign). You specify the menu item’s text when activating the item in an add-on project.
    Regards,
    Priyanka.

  • What is the main difference between view and materialize view and advantage of Mview   ??

    What is the main difference between view and materialize view and advantage of Mview   ??

    1.A view uses a query to pull data from its associated tables.
    2.Views do not have data's physically stored in the Database.
    3.Views Get the Data from 2 or more tables and displays as a single block.
    4.But a materialized view is a table on disk is a result set of a query done.
    5.A Materialized view can have data's in the database.
    6.Materialized view are used for Boosting the Performance.
    7.And the important one is Materialized views are updated based on the parameters defined when they are created.
    8.By using triggers we can update the data in a materialized view.
    9.When you call a materialized view it will show the data when it was last updated.
    Hope it helps.

  • Difference between 3G and Dual Mode?

    When I go through cellular network options, I get 3 options as GSM, 3G and Dual Mode. What is the difference between the Dual Mode and 3G, and what exactly is this Dual Mode? When should I choose that over 3G?
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Dual mode means that the phone will connect to either 2G (GSM) or 3G connections. It will try for a 3G connection if it's strong enough, otherwise, it will go to a 2G connection.
    The difference between 3G and dual mode, is in 3G mode, the phone will only try to connect to a 3G connection.
    In most cases, dual would be better. If you are in an area will really strong and constitent 3G, then it's probably better to be on 3G.

  • What is the fundamental difference between classful and classless routing?

    Hello to all,
    After reading several RFCs, guides and HOWTOs I am confused by an apparently trivial question - what is the basic, fundamental difference between classful and classless routing?
    I am well aware that - said in a very primitive way - the classful routing does not make use of netmasks and instead uses the address classes while the classless routing utilizes the netmasks and does not evaluate the address classes.
    However, already in 1985 the RFC 950 (Internet Standard Subnetting Procedure) stated that the networks can be further subnetted using the network mask. Since then the routers are expected to use network masks in the routing decision process in the precise way they use it nowadays. However, if the routers use network masks they are doing the classless routing, aren't they? Where is then the difference if we used to describe the 80's way of routing as a classful routing? Or was it already the classless routing? The RFCs about CIDR came gradually only in 1992 and 1993.
    If somebody could give me an insight into the key difference between classful and classless routing (and perhaps into the Internet history, how was the real routing done then) I would be most grateful.
    Thank you a lot!
    Regards,
    Peter

    Hello Mohammed,
    I am afraid we still have not understood each other ;) I am not looking for the algorithms used to select the best path. I am well aware of them, both Ford-Bellman and Dijkstra, and about their internals. By the way, these algorithms do not have any influence whether the routing is classful or classless because they deal with metrics, not with masks. For example, a classless EIGRP internally uses a distance-vector algorithm, not a SPF algorithm.
    I will try to explain once more what is my problem... There are two terms commonly used but badly defined: the classless routing and classful routing. Originally, I have thought that the classful routing works as follows:
    - The routing table consists only of classful destination networks (major nets), metrics and respective gateways. No network masks are stored in the table because we are classful, that is, we use exclusively the route classes and all entries in the routing table are already classful.
    - When routing a packet, the router looks at its destination IP address and determines the major net of this IP address (that is, the classful network that this IP address belongs to). Then it looks up the corresponding entry in the routing table and sends the packet to the respective gateway.
    I thought that the classful routing works in this way. I won't describe the classless routing - both of us know how do the today's routers select the next hop.
    However, in the RFCs 917 and 950 which were published in 1985, long ago before the term 'classless routing' was coined, the network mask was already defined and it was stated how the routers should work with it.
    Now I am confused. The terms classless addresses and classless routing were defined sometime in 1990's, therefore I assume that the routing before the invention of classless IP assignment can be in fact described as classful. In other words, I thought that the routing that was commonly used in 1980's did not use netmasks and can be described as classful because the notion of classlessness came first in 1990's. But now I see that netmasks were defined in 1985.
    Now where am I wrong? Do I understand the classful routing properly as I described it? Is it correct to talk about routing in that era as classful although the netmasks were already in use? Or was it already the classless routing?
    Basically I am trying to understand what was called the classful routing if the classless routing is said to be something different.
    Mohammed, I am most grateful to you for your patience and suggestions! Thank you indeed.
    Regards,
    Peter

  • What's the security difference between WPA and WPA2 Personal?

    In order to get my G4 iMac (OS 10.4.11) onto my new AEBS(b/g/n) wi-fi network, I had to drop the network security down from WPA2 Personal to WPA/WPA2 Personal.
    What are the potential security risks in this mode? I know that WEP is no longer secure, so I'm concerned about WPA also being vulnerable.
    If there's a good online explanation of these security differences (not necessarily Apple-only), you just give me that link.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Summary:
    1.WPA2 is the improved version of WPA
    2.WPA only supports TKIP encryption while WPA2 supports AES
    3.Theoretically, WPA2 is not hackable while WPA is
    4.WPA2 requires more processing power than WPA
    http://www.differencebetween.net/technology/difference-between-wpa-and-wpa2/

  • How to join three tables and practical difference between 10g and 11g

    I want to know with example how to outer join three different tables in Oracle.
    Also if you have any website or reference for understand syntax or performance difference between 10g and 11g then please paste a link in.thanks!!

    Hi,
    897293 wrote:
    I want to know with example how to outer join three different tables in Oracle.The 3rd table comes into the result set the same way the 2nd one did:
    FROM           table_1  t1
    LEFT OUTER JOIN      table_2  t2  ON   ...
    LEFT OUTER JOIN      table_3  t3  ON   ...The join condition(s) for t3 can reference t1, or t2, or both.
    Also if you have any website or reference for understand syntax or performance difference between 10g and 11g then please paste a link in.thanks!!The main manuals all have "What's New" sections near the beginning. For example:
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28286/wnsql.htm#sthref5
    Hoek,
    We've missed you. Welcome back!

  • What is the main difference between BPEL and ESB

    Hi all,
    I am making use ESB in my application .Where the my client application calls ESB and inturn the ESB calls the BPEL process .
    I want to know the differences between BPEL and ESB,I came to know that ESB can do messaging and routing ,where my BPEL process can also do the same thing .
    I came to know form a vendor that ESB is used for connecting to multiple end points ,where as my BPEL process can also do this.
    SO what is main purpose of using ESB ?
    Cheers,
    Kalyan.
    Message was edited by:
    patti

    Hi,
    Look for the blog entry dated 1st october 2007.
    URL:
    http://abhishek-soablog.blogspot.com
    Cheers,
    Abhi...

  • What are the Basic Differences between Oracle and  MS-SQL server Database?

    Hello,
            anybody pls Guide me about the Differences between Oracle and MS-SQL server Database.and also IBM Databases also
    Regards,
    Balaram

    SQL Server only works on Windows-based platforms, including Windows 9x, Windows NT, Windows 2000 and Windows CE.
    In comparison with SQL Server , OracleDatabase supports all known platforms, including Windows-based platforms, AIX-Based Systems, Compaq Tru64 UNIX, HP 9000 Series HP-UX, Linux Intel, Sun Solaris and so on.
    The SQL Server  advantages:
    SQL Server  holds the top TPC-C performance and price/performance results.
    SQL Server  is generally accepted as easier to install, use and manage.
    The Oracle  Database advantages:
    Oracle  Database supports all known platforms, not only the Windows-based platforms.
    PL/SQL is more powerful language than T-SQL.
    More fine-tuning to the configuration can be done via start-up parameters.
    Samrat

Maybe you are looking for