RV042G and RIP traffic

Folks,
I have one RV042G with a static IP running on gateway mode, with a cable modem in bridge mode on the WAN side and three SG500X-24 on the LAN side.   The port connecting to my Layer 3 switches is configured on VLAN 2 in the RV042G.
The SG500X's have multiple VLANs and IP subnets configured. I'm using one trunk port on the Master switch, configured as untagged member of VLAN 2. The trunk port is also a tagged member of all other VLANs configured in the stack.   Every VLAN has its IP address and the VLAN 2 IP address is their default gateway.   InterVLAN routing seems to be working on this setup, thus my RV042G should never see IP routing traffic that belongs inside the Layer 3 stack.
Now, I'm passing on to the wider picture.   Have configured my RV042G with static IP routes that belong inside my SG500X stack.   But, the question is, if I configure both the RV042G and the SG500X's to use RIP v2, can't I use RIP to dynamically communicate all the route information from the RV042G to the SG500X stack and get rid of all the static IP routes?   Does RIP traffic ride on the LAN side of the RV042G or only on the WAN side?
Regards
kpiq

Hello Mr. Stian Bjerk
Thank you for joining the Cisco small business Community, In order to provide the best support possible you will find assistance for all Cisco Small business products. In this case DynDNS is not a tool provided by Cisco. To point you in the right direction please contact the software developer of this product.
Thank you and I hope you find this answer useful.

Similar Messages

RV042g and QuickVPN Issues

Hello,
We purchased a RV042g for simple VPN purposes. We have been experimenting with QuickVPN and have had a very difficult time. The clients will occasionally become unable to finalize the connection. The logs on the router show that authentication was successful and that the client disconnected immediately after. The client logs show that they were unable to ping the gateway. These issues disappear once the router is restarted (which has become a daily ritual).
We have also had difficulties with QuickVPN under certain conditions. For example, we have noticed issues to the router via QuickVPN immediately after one client goes to sleep while connected. This may not be the exact cause of that issue, but it happens so consistently that it appears to be the case. In addition, one client cannot connect via WiFi while others can.
The QuickVPN clients are latest, as is the firmware on the router. The router has had the 'Enable WAN Request' option toggled on and off. In addition, all clients have different ISPs, and have had successful connections at least once. The clients are a mixture of Windows 7 and Windows 8 (under Compatibility Mode).
Any help would be appreciated. We are not sure if this is something we can actively prevent or not.
Thanks

Hello Sean,
I have worked with VPNs some, and many times, the installed firewall software on my hosts causes problems by blocking certain Internet traffic.To see if your firewall is causing problems, start your computer in Safe Mode with Networking. If your connection works, it means that your firewall is the problem.
Here is an article that might help with the firewall test:
Test Quick Virtual Private Network (QVPN) on Windows 7 with Safe Mode
Also, here is an article that might help with double checking your router and QuickVPN settings:
Manage VPN Users and Configure Quick VPN on RV016, RV042, RV042G and RV082 VPN Routers
I hope this helps!
Alex

Can you connect a usb-cd/dvd rom to the new ipad and rip cds to the library?

can you connect a powered usb cd/dvd rom to the newest ipad via the connector and rip cds directly?? can the pad process this w/o a special app or add on/ or at all?

No. It won't work.
Rip your CD/DVD on computer and sync/copy to iPad

Can an Ironport work in both WCCPv2 and L4 Traffic monitoring modes at the same time?

Hello Ciscoers,
We have an ironport installed and we use WCCPv2 to redirect the traffic. And as it occurs, I have a need to forward the traffic for another network, that uses another path to the Internet.
So I was thinking using the L4 Traffic Monitoring.
To the best of your knowledge, is there a way to have the appliance use both WCCPv2 and L4 Traffic monitoring at the same time? From the configuration, it's one or the other.
Thanks,
J.

Ok. I'll try.
As a matter of fact, I plan to use policy-based routing to forward all the "interesting" traffic to the appliance.
For your TCP-Resets not seen, do you allow ingress on the span session?
J.

Copp and management traffic

Good afternoon fellow Ciscorians.
I have configured a Copp to rate limit ICMP traffic and fragmented traffic from saturating the RP via the control-plane and also ignore the same traffic class from our trusted IP addresses. But i am wondering about management traffic such as telnet and SSH, we have an access list on the VTY lines dropping traffic from un-trusted sources on 22+23, i am wondering what the benefits are to employing a Copp policy as well as the access-list on the VTY lines?
Could an attack still saturate the RP with an access-list dropping the un-trusted traffic on the VTY lines? (6509-Sup720)
Matthew.

Hi Matthew,
access-list applied on interface is applicable for all traffic, data traffic (transit traffic) and control-plane traffic (destined to router or punted to RP), while CoPP is only applicable to traffic punted to RP.
Access list will either permit or drop but CoPP is service-policy and you can rate-limit the traffic. So if we take example of ICMP traffic, and requirement is we want to allow ICMP traffic to router (ICMP is useful tool to check reachability and latency) but not more than 500kbps (to avoid any DDOS attack), in this case blocking ICMP with ACL on interface will not solve the purpose but CoPP will do the job.
If you are blocking some traffic via ACL, it should not saturate the RP.
--Pls dont forget to rate helpful posts--
Regards,
Akash

SRP521W - Local and Remote Traffic Cannot be the Same Subnet Address

I support an existing VPN infrastructure with PIX, Juniper NS5GT, and Netopia devices used as VPN endpoints. In all cases, I can create a VPN where the location's internal subnet, 10.x.y.0/24 sends traffic to 10.0.0.0/8 out the VPN tunnel. In the case of this 521W that we are evaluating, it appears that I cannot do this. Insteadm when creating the IPSEC policy I get this error "Local and Remote Traffic Cannot be the Same Subnet Address." Which, while strictly true, has never been an issue with all the above devices. Is there a workaround or other methodology to support this?
Thanks.

We have extactly the same problem with the SRP527W. Other Cisco small business products work like.
Cisco RV 120W
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10852/index.html
Cisco WRV210
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps9929/index.html
We need a device with that supports one IPSec VPN and one ADSL interface and is easy to use like these devices.

Best way to pass IPv4 and IPv6 traffic over a GRE Tunnel

Hello,
We have two 3825 routers with Advanced Enterprise IOS 12.4.9(T). Each of them serves many IPv4 (private and public) and IPv6 networks on their respective site.
We have created a wireless link between the two, using 4 wireless devices, with IP Addresses 10.10.2.2, 3, 4, 5 respectively (1 and 6 are the two end Ethernet interfaces on the routers).
Then we created a GRE tunnel over this link using addresses 172.16.1.1 and 2 (for the two ends) to route traffic over this link.
Now we want to route IPv6 traffic over the same link. However, we found that simply routing the IPv6 traffic over the above GRE / IP tunnel did not work.
Questions:
Is there a way we can use the same (GRE / IP) tunnel to transport both IPv4 and IPv6 traffic?
If not, can we setup two GRE tunnels over the same wireless link, that is, one GRE / IP for IPv4 traffic and a second one GRE / IPv6 for IPv6 traffic?
In brief, what is the suggested way to transport IPv4 and IPv6 traffic over the aforementioned (wireless) link?
I have read http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/12_4/interface/configuration/guide/inb_tun.html#wp1061361 and other Internet material, however I am still confused.
Please help.
Thanks in advance,
Nick

We have set up two tunnels over the same link, one GRE / IP for the IPv4 traffic and one IPv6 / IP ("manual") for the IPv6 traffic. This setup seems to be working OK.
If there are other suggestions, please advise.
Thanks,
Nick

HT4557 Shared libraries from other people's libraries showing up permanently on MacBook Pro. And a lot of purchased and ripped songs vanished... Anyone...please help...?!?!

Shared libraries from other people's libraries showing up permanently on MacBook Pro. And a lot of purchased and ripped songs vanished... Anyone...please help...?!?!
The home sharing is now off and still has all the songs one there. Even rebooted the wifi modem, supporting hard drives and all computer involved in this catastrophe!! :( all computer are all updated and updated to the new iTunes.
Please any help would be greatly appreciated and any more questions welcome. Thanks

Basically anything not purchased from iTunes that is on my iPhone 6 will not sync over to my MacBook. I have tried to just manually back it up but only the purchased music will sync over to iTunes.

CSS11503 - Inbound and outbound traffic on same virtual interface

Setup two CSS11503's running 8.10. Running and active/passive config.
Two groups of servers each with a VIP. Both groups of servers on the same VLAN.
The VIP's reside on VLAN1 and the servers are on VLAN2
Problem:
Servers from one group cannot access the other via it's VIP. Servers cannot access themselves via their VIP as well.
Can ping the vip's with out a problem.
I assume that this is because that traffic generated by a client is going in and out of the same interface.
I have come across similar problems on various firewalls.
Is there anyway of getting around this.
Thanks
Julian

Julian,
this is not the same issue as firewall preventing traffic to go in and out the same interface.
The problem here is that the CSS will receive traffic from Server1, it will nat the vip into Server2 and forward traffic keeping the src ip unchanged.
So, when Server2 replies, it sends the response to Server1. Since they are on the same subnet, the response bypass the CSS and Server1 receives a response from Server2 which is unknown to Server1 since it expects a response from the Vip.
The solution is to implement source nat on the CSS for traffic originating from the servers.
This can be done with a group and an ACL.
This was discussed many times, so I think you should be able to find a sample config somewhere.
If you can't let me know.
Gilles.

How does QoS work with WAAS WCCP? What's the interaction between QoS Traffic Classification and WAE Traffic Application Policy?

How does QoS work with WAAS WCCP? What's the interaction between Router QoS Traffic Classification and WAE Traffic Application Policy?

By default, WAAS preserves the DSCP marking on intercepted packets. There is a configuration option to set/override the DSCP value at the global (device), application, and classifier levels. Currently WAAS provides marking only. There is no action taken by WAAS based on the DSCP value.
Regards,
Zach

I have Imovie 08 and ripped home movies in the Apple TV mode. IMovie won't import them?

I have Imovie 08 and ripped home movies in the Apple TV mode. IMovie won't import them?

Try this.
Open your home movie in QuickTime Player X. (Or right click on your home movie in the Finder and select Open With... QuickTime Player.
Then click the Commenad Key and the letter I at the same time to open the Inspector.
Tell us what you see next to the word Format: in the Inspector.

Police and prioritize traffic

i have an mpls service from provider that provides a guaranteed bandwidth of 200 mbps (total) to traffic marked af11 or af12 and best effort for unmarked traffic.
i want to create a marking / policing policy that allows customer to prioritize af11 over af12 in ce facing provider.
ce device should transmit af11 traffic up to 200 mbps and if it exceeds 200 mbps mark down before sending to provider.
if no af11 traffic is present ce device should transmit af12 traffic up to 200 mbps and if it exceeds 200 mbps mark down
before sending to provider.
If both af11 and af12 traffic are present however, af11 should be prioritised over af12 traffic.
i.e. if af11 traffic is at 150 mbps and af12 at 50 mbps and af11 traffic increases to 160 mbps this should now cause af12
traffic in excess of 40 mbps to be marked down before sending to provider.
Not sure if this is possible but would really appreciate your input.

Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
I think you'll find the matching rate-limit will "win", i.e. it's not recursive.
I believe I understand what you want to accomplish, but still don't see a way to accomplish it, even across multiple devices.
Also, I cannot see how it can be done with "stock" QoS features, because to do this, a process really needs to analyze a packet stream before it's transmitted. Basically given a set of packets with the AF11 and AF12 markings, you need to "look" ahead at the packets that will "fit" in the Tc for the physical egress rate. Once that's determined, you can allow up to Bc of AF11 packets. If Bc isn't fully consumed by AF11 packets, you allow what's left over to AF12 packets.
Policers/rate-limiters don't look ahead.

Library organisation and ripping advice

Hi
I have recently purchased an ipod Nano(8gb)and have had a 2nd gen shuffle for about 6 month.
Prior to getting an iPod and using iTunes, I had a Creative Zen Xtra. I have ripped the majority of my cd's to my hd (10000+ @128kbs and all in mp3 format) via Musicmatch.
All my music is kept in My Documents/Jukebox/[Artist]/Artist-Trackname.mp3 and this has served me well and managed to successfully import all into iTunes.
I still have 40% of my cd's to import which I would normally rip via Musicmatch but its not recognising as many of my cd's via online lookup and having to manually type in.
iTunes is far superior in recognising the cd and aslo getting the album art (which I want now as have nano).
There are also some cd's that I want to complete,i.e I burned the cd but just the album tracks,not the single releases as they were ripped for the single cd. Obviously according to iPod when you choose that album, it has 'gaps' in the track number and does not associate the single with the album.
I was thinking of biting the bullet and ripping all my cd's again via iTunes to make everything consistent Artist/Album/Trackname - then renaming files Artist-Trackname.mp3
Is there a more refined and quicker solution than this?
Thanks in advance
Graeme

Hi
Thanks for the info. Maybe I didn't explain myself very well
When I ripped my cd's over a period of many months (I ripped them all via Musicmatch and made sure that the ID tags for trackname , artist and album were filled correctly. I then used the feature inside musicmatch to use the artist and trackname tags to create the filename.
I then used to put all the files into their own artist subdirectory. So far so good.
However since using iTunes I have now run into 3 problems:-
1) I would now like to fill in the Year , Album art and genre tag fields for each track with as automated an approach as possible. I know iTunes would do this if I reimported all cd's but this would take ages (Library is around 12000 tracks).
2) Each artist folder is not subdivided, there is no heirarchy, so all Oasis tracks for example are in folder called Oasis. I would like to be able to take this directory and have a folder for each album, like itunes does. All the tags are there for it to be done, just looking again for software to automate this process.
3) To try and reduce duplicates, I used to omit tracks from albums that I had the singles for, and just rip the single. This was fine but now on my iPod if i choose an album there may be 3 or 4 tracks missing. I know want to go back and import those tracks I omitted so the album is complete, irrespective of how many times that track now appears, so i can play album in it's entirety. So I am looking for a quick way to do this.
I can't really notice a difference between 128 and 192, however i may have selective hearing so i don't have to rip all my cd's again :0)
Cheers
Graeme

Hi, My mp3s and ripped CDs sound like some weird, ring modulated alien metallic 'thing'

Hi, My mp3s and ripped CDs sound like some weird, ring modulated alien metallic 'thing' since installing 10.5, purchases sound fine, and the original files are not corrupted, but CDs are burned with the same distortion, please help! Thank you.

Okay it seems i'm not alone, just the read the previous ongoing thread about this and will be rolling back to 10.4 to cure it. .

WAAS- Optimization for OCS and Wireless traffic

Hi,
I have been trying to find some information regarding optimization of Microsoft Office Communicator and Wireless traffic across a WAN environment via WAAS and its acceleration/optimization capabilities.
So far, I have seen the case studies section for WAAS but no case offers what I am looking for...
Do you have any information/documentation that can be shared with customers regarding OCS and Wireless as key business application that were benefited after a WAAS deployment?
Thanks
Regards,
M.

Hi Manuel,
Answers for you:
So we can say that wireless traffic across a WAN link could not obtain any benefits from any WAN optimization solution, in this case WAAS?
Ans: Nope. I do nto mean that. What I am trying to say is - it's a different thing. Wireless or no Wireless, optimization can be done when the traffic passes thru edge and core side WAEs. If it passes thru only one WAE, it will go in pass thru.
If a wireless controller at a remote site needs to send traffic to another wireless controller in a centralized or HUB site, can we optimize this traffic or it will just benefit from the overall reduction in bandwidth as a result of any TCP based application getting optimized?
Ans: It really does not matter. The traffic really needs to pass thru WAEs on both sides in order to optimize. Whether it is from wireless controller or from any other devices, it really does not matter. Further the type of traffic and policies on WAEs will determine how much optimization can be done, if any.
OCS uses SIP which is TCP based or ports 506x so I am assuming that SIP could be benfited by WAAS unless OCS uses a secured session were SIP is encrypted.: Yes, WAAS can help you but SIP is a voice traffic and there are default policies like VoIP on WAAS which will pass thru this traffic for port 5060. It's not a good idea to optimize voice traffic due to various reasons.

RV042G and RIP traffic

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for