RV180W Router Issues

Hi
We've just replaced a netgear router for a Cisco RV180w but it's causing some issues, it seems to be stopping any PC based browser loading properly, it connects to the site but doesn't load the page if you hit F5 it loads immediately but this is causing real problems with any secure site we are submitting information to ie. the bank as it's submitting the information but then not responding back to say its complete. I've swapped the router back to the netgear and the issue goes away???
Any ideas please.
Thanks
Matt

Hi Matt,
I am so sorry to hear you have issue with RV180W.  Could you please let me know your internet type DSL, T1 or Cable? I like to know your router current firmware version as well.
I will check firmware version 1st
how to change it?
Login to router GUI/or web page
Select Status --> System Summary ( Firmware version X.X.X.X ) 
The latest firmware version is 1.0.3.10
http://software.cisco.com/download/release.html?mdfid=284005928&catid=268437899&softwareid=282487380&release=1.0.3.10&relind=AVAILABLE&rellifecycle=&reltype=latest
If you need to upgrade firmware, download firmware 1.0.3.10
loging to router
Select Administration --> Firmware Upgrade ( click browse button,) and then Select check box Reset all configuration/ setting to factory defaults --> click Start Frimware Upgrade
The latest firmware support new feature so you need to factory default unit.
If your internet DSL/or T1 you need to change MTU to 1492
select Netowkring --> WAN --> IPv4 --> MTU Type Customer --> MTU Size 1492
Select Save
Also I like change DNS as well 
you can change DNS in WAN port section or LAN ports configuration
I like LAN port configuration DNS
select Networking --> LAN --> IP4 LAN --> 
Primary DNS Server 8.8.8.8    ( google DNS )
Secondary DNS Server 4.2.2.2  ( verizon DNS )
Select Save
Thanks,
Moh

Similar Messages

  • Routing Issue with 2 Nics on Windows Server 2008 R2

    Good Day
    My issue is I needed to set up port forwarding for a web server to communicate with our hotels management server to check availability.
    Initially the server has a single Nic configured in the 172.26.1.0 /24 network  , Its default gateway the Switch vlan interface 172.26.1.1
    We have many vlans for all the systems in the hotel and the server also needs to communicate with 3 other servers on different subnets which it does just fine.
    I now added an additional adsl line with a managed router which has an interface of 192.168.10.1 /24 , My servers second NIC has the IP address 192.168.10.2 with its gateway being the 192.168.10.1
    This 192.168.10.0 network is in a L2 Vlan and the rest of the network does not know it exists. It was working fine then just stopped asfter i added a static route to the server , which i did with RRas... I did this as the server could not communicate with
    just one of the servers..
    If i disable the 172.26.1.0 NIC the port forwarding works but then obviously the rest of the network goes down.. I know its a routing issue but am lost
    please help

    Hello,
    using multiple default gateways is not a good idea.
    See details in http://support.microsoft.com/kb/159168/en-us
    Best regards
    Meinolf Weber
    MVP, MCP, MCTS
    Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
    My Blog: http://blogs.msmvps.com/MWeber
    Disclaimer: This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.
    Twitter:  

  • Routing issue- seeing same IPs for two hops

    Hello All,
    I'm seeing two same IPs in the traceroute output. Is that due to routing issue that nexhop is as the same device for the first time?
    Log:
    6  10.30.102.26  61.060 ms 10.30.100.142  61.266 ms 10.30.102.26  61.071 ms
    7  10.30.102.26  61.139 ms  61.211 ms 10.61.191.2  60.948 ms
    Can you  guys help me to fix the issue??
    Regards,
    Thiyagu

    Are you load balancing anywhere?
    6 10.30.102.26  61.060 ms
       10.30.100.142  61.266 ms
       10.30.102.26  61.071 ms
    7 10.30.102.26  61.139 ms  61.211 ms
       10.61.191.2  60.948 ms
    HTH,
    John
    *** Please rate all useful posts ***

  • Routing Issue with Telia

    I think verizon has a routing issue with Telia.

    thought I would share this,   Telia has admited an issue on their network
    Twitter / Telia_service: @Ungvall routing problem? This ...
    https://twitter.com/Telia_service/status/179661595276881921
    Cached
    Similar
    Share
    View shared post
    BTW Apparently @Telia_service had routing problems on both the latest iOS and ... DNS problem and we are working with Akamai for a sollution to this problem

  • Routing Issue with 3550

    I am having a routing issue with a 3550 switch. I have 5 vlans and I need one of the vlans to access a different router based on destination IP rather than our edge router. I have entered a static route on the 3550 that points to the secondary router whenever a certain network is tried to be accessed. My problem is I can't seem to get the traffic to flow correctly. When I trace route an address on the Internet the path shows as expected, the 3550 then my firewall then my edge router. When I trace an address that is on the other side of the secondary router I get the 3550 as the first hop, then nothing. I can ping the address so I know the path is up. What could be the issue? Thanks in advance.

    Hello,
    in addition to Mahmood´s post, what do you have defined as the next hop for the default route to the secondary router ? If you use an interface on the 3550 as the next hop, make sure that whatever is connected is in the same subnet, otherwise use the IP address of the next hop. So, let´s say your remote network is 192.168.1.0, and the secondary router is connected to FastEthernet0/1, your default route should look like this if the secondary router is in the same subnet (in this example, the IP address of the secondary router would be 172.16.1.2):
    interface FastEthernet0/1
    no switchport
    ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.252
    ip route 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 FastEthernet0/0
    Otherwise, try:
    ip route 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.1.2
    where 172.16.1.2 would be the address of the secondary router.
    Does that make sense ?
    Regards,
    GNT

  • No airtunes with pppoE due to routing issues?

    I just switched to an optical fiber to the home internet connection (which is getting pretty popular here in Japan). Needless to say, the network is very fast, however, I can no longer use airtunes via my airport express network. The airport express stations (both of them) no longer show up in iTunes. My guess is that this is due to a routing issue and the same problem must have been encountered by others before and hopefully solved. The new internet connection uses pppoE to make a connection to the internet service provider. This gives me an internet address of the form 125.197.xx.yy. I still have my airport express set to get an address via dhcp (which the new optical fiber hub provides) and is of the typical private network form 192.168.1.4. When I am connected by pppoE to the internet, my iTunes cannot see my airport express due to routing issues I assume. Is there an elegant solution to this -- can I use my airtunes and the internet at the same time? Would modifying the internet routing help here (I have used this before when I have had multiple interfaces going (e.g. one in a secure local lan and the other supporting an internet connection via ssh to the outside world). Any advise would be much appreciated. I haven't tried asking my airport express to log in via pppoE -- is this the only solution?

    Well as I have for my last several posts -- I solved the problem myself. I am pretty sure that the root cause was a routing problem (pretty obvious in fact). By have the airport express base station connect via pppoE itself (I have a remote relay airport express as well) and switching to NAT and DHCP distribution of addresses via the airport express, I can both see my airtunes as well as my ethernet connection. It is a non-ideal solution as I have a fixed IP which would have been convenient to log in from outside to, but I guess I can live with that.

  • Audio tracks playing different audio tracks - routing issue?

    I'm having trouble with some routing issues I believe. Here's the deal:
    Some audio tracks are playing different audio tracks, when that region is not even in it. For instance:
    Track #2 is Soloed. Output is Output 1-2. I hear the audio file that is in Track #1, which is NOT Soloed and I shouldn't even hear. I don't hear anything from Track #2. The only way I can hear Track #2 is by playing it from the audio bin, which obviously isn't going to work out right.
    If I drag the audio region of Track #2 to a brand new audio track, I still don't hear anything. Is it possible this audio file(s) got corrupted somehow?
    Please help!

    Chris Joye wrote:
    I'm having trouble with some routing issues I believe. Here's the deal:
    Some audio tracks are playing different audio tracks, when that region is not even in it. For instance:
    Track #2 is Soloed. Output is Output 1-2. I hear the audio file that is in Track #1, which is NOT Soloed and I shouldn't even hear. I don't hear anything from Track #2. The only way I can hear Track #2 is by playing it from the audio bin, which obviously isn't going to work out right.
    If I drag the audio region of Track #2 to a brand new audio track, I still don't hear anything. Is it possible this audio file(s) got corrupted somehow?
    Please help!
    Check the parameters, in the left side of the arrange page window.
    To me, it sounds as if you have a bunch of arrange tracks, which are all playing back through audio track #1.
    Cheers

  • IB Routing issue. Unable to find routing to the corresponding incoming msg

    Hi All,
    We are facing a Routing issue. The flow of message across the DB is given below.
    1) Message will be triggered from 3rd party application to PeopleSoft portal with Service Operation A
    2) From portal one more service operation B will be invoked to communicate with CRM
    Both the service operations are synchronous. I have tested the Service operation in CRM and I am able to get the results. But in Portal if I test, I am getting the error like
    +"Unable to find routing corresponding to the incoming request message"+
    I have checked the routing alias name between Portal and CRM data bases and Its same.
    could you please give us a clue to debug this further?
    Thanks,
    Hari.A

    You should check which permission list the service operation is attached to, and check if the user has been granted to, Something like the following from the backend :
    SELECT   distinct c.roleuser
    FROM     psclassdefn a, psroleclass b, psroleuser c
    WHERE    a.classid = b.classid
    AND      b.rolename = c.rolename
    AND      a.classid = '<permission_list>' If nothing is returned for your user, then you could created a new role and give it to the user.
    Also, since you are on Peopletools 8.52, all this configuration settings can be done through Integration Network WorkCenter. I wrote articles about that (and you can find something about permission list for a given service operation as well) :
    http://gasparotto.blogspot.nl/2012/11/peopletools-852-integration-network.html
    Nicolas.

  • NO HELP WITH ROUTING ISSUES FROM VERIZON

    Spend 2 hours with technical support to no avail. Have routing issues where I can’t get from my FIOS residential account to remote web site abroad. Trace route fails at so-0-0-0.XT1.AMS2.ALTER.NET [146.188.14.209]. FIOS technical support is incapable of doing any troubleshooting beyond basic customer premises equipment, refusing to escalate the case to network engineering team. I was basically told by FIOS tech support supervisor {edited for privacy} that this is not Verizon’s problem and no help will be provided. What is even more frustrating that Verizon agents are not capable of receiving emails from customers with details such as trace route.
    Is there anyone at Verizon monitoring this and able to help? Just in case, ticket number that I have with Verizon is {edited for privacy}
    Here is trace route details.
    tracert 212.44.136.226
    Tracing route to brserv.bridgetour.ru [212.44.136.226]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:
      1     1 ms    <1 ms     1 ms  Wireless_Broadband_Router.home [192.168.1.1]
      2    12 ms     9 ms     9 ms  L100.BSTNMA-VFTTP-71.verizon-gni.net [98.118.28
    1]
      3    16 ms    19 ms    19 ms  G0-6-4-1.BSTNMA-LCR-21.verizon-gni.net [130.81.
    75.132]
      4    45 ms    15 ms     8 ms  ae3-0.BOS-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net [130.81.151.6
      5    19 ms    19 ms    19 ms  0.xe-3-2-0.IL1.NYC9.ALTER.NET [152.63.26.81]
      6    21 ms    19 ms    19 ms  0.ge-1-2-0.IL1.NYC12.ALTER.NET [152.63.26.86]
      7   107 ms   108 ms   107 ms  so-0-0-0.XT1.AMS2.ALTER.NET [146.188.14.209]
      8     *        *        *     Request timed out.
      9     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     10     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     11     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     12     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     13     *        *        *     Request timed out.

    BT help aren't always that helpful, but BT engineers claim that it is a BT sales issue and nothing to do with them seems a bit extreme.
    Are you sure your daily speed is 8Mbits, not 8Mbytes?  How are you measuring this?  Is it the number coming from the BT speedtest?
    If it really is 8Mb, then I think it's worth checking with the mods;  at: http://bt.custhelp.com/app/contact_email/c/4951 .  But be aware they take 3 working days to reply: sometimes more if busy. 

  • Verizon/Time Warner Routing Issue

    I've been having trouble logging on to my email through Outlook, IPad, or IPhone.  The service provider is Time Warner.  Apparently the problem is a routing issue between Time Warner and Verizon and they've had the routing issues for over 2 months and have still not resolved the problem.  Since no one at Verizon seems to know anything about this, does anyone have any information as to when the issue will be resolved?

    I can sign in using webmail and see my email.  But I can't use Outlook, my IPad or IPhone utilities to see my email using TW as a provider.  If I'm anywhere else, using any other provider, I can use Outlook, my IPad and IPhone without any problems.
    When I called TW, they told me the problem was a routing issue that both TW and Verizon were working on and had been working on for at least 2 months, but no solution yet.  They were surprised that no one at Verizon knew this.
    Since everything worked fine until a week ago and nothing changed in my settings and Verizon verified that everything was set up correctly, I'm satisfied that this is the issue.  My concern is that not one Verizon representative has acknowledged that there is a routing problem between TW and Verizon; especially if the problem has existed well over 2 months.  You would think that an issue like this should be shared among all their troubleshooting team.

  • Possible internet routing issues driving me crazy!

    I've somehow hit a problem accessing a particular favourite website and it seems I may have a routing issue.
    I've spoken with a friend who is fairly network savvy and he's suggested I raise a case \ complaint with BT. I thought I'd use this forum to test if I'm missing something I could be doing to fix it before logging a problem with BT Helpdesk!
    I've a BT Homehub 2 (Current firmware    4.7.5.1.83.3.5 (Type B) and I can access pretty much all websites I care to look at without any issue at all, however the site I read most days is now no longer viewable on any of my 2 PC's nor my iPhone. When I try to access it I  get no error messages at all just a blank white page.
    Doesn't matter if I try using IE or Firefox or Chrome browers it's the same result - I just see a blank white page.
    The site in question www.celticquicknews.co.uk (or www.celticquicknews.com) and is definitely available, as I can access it when using a site such as http://www.free-internet-organization.tk/ on both my PC's and iphone so I know the web site is up and running and available for browsing but since Thursday lunchtime I've had no joy in being to access that particular site directly wihout resorting to using another middleman site to let me view it.
    I have tweeted the guy who hosts the www.celticquicknews.co.uk site and he's said his site is fine but has numerous similar queries around BTINTERNET folks having the same issue as I'm reporting.
    I run McAfee Internet Security and having disabled the various firewall \secure browsing functions no improvement still no joy.
    I did successfully somehow connect directy to the illusive web site this morning (Sunday 1st May) on my iphone at around 10am, but by the time I boiled the kettle to have a coffeee and sit and read the site it became inaccessable again on my iphone and both my PC's! So what's going on?
    www.celticquicknews.co.uk [217.174.253.143]
    www.celticquicknews.com [217.174.253.143]
    Homehub TCP\IP info is as below which I suspect is of value to the more techincal on the forum:
    Broadband network IP address    109.152.154.29
    Default gateway    217.32.142.102
    Primary DNS    194.72.0.114
    Secondary DNS    62.6.40.162
    ADSL line status
    Connection Information
    Line state    Connected
    Connection time    0 days, 01:11:16
    Downstream    15,978 Kbps
    Upstream    1,144 Kbps
    ADSL Settings
    VPI/VCI    0/38
    Type    PPPoA
    Modulation    G.992.5 Annex A
    Latency type    Interleaved
    Noise margin (Down/Up)    5.2 dB / 6.0 dB
    Line attenuation (Down/Up)    31.0 dB / 13.8 dB
    Output power (Down/Up)    23.6 dBm / 1.7 dBm
    C:\>tracert -d 217.174.253.143
    Tracing route to 217.174.253.143 over a maximum of 30 hops
      1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.1.254
      2    15 ms    15 ms    15 ms  217.32.142.102
      3    18 ms    17 ms    16 ms  217.32.142.142
      4    22 ms    22 ms    21 ms  213.120.163.26
      5    22 ms    20 ms    21 ms  217.32.27.30
      6    21 ms    21 ms    21 ms  217.32.27.178
      7    22 ms    21 ms    21 ms  109.159.250.78
      8    33 ms    35 ms    35 ms  109.159.250.13
      9    28 ms    28 ms    29 ms  62.172.102.1
     10    29 ms    28 ms    28 ms  195.66.224.98
     11    33 ms    34 ms    33 ms  88.208.255.61
     12    38 ms    32 ms    33 ms  88.208.255.102
     13     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     14     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     15     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     16     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     17     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     18     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     19     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     20     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     21     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     22     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     23     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     24     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     25     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     26     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     27     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     28     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     29     *        *        *     Request timed out.
     30     *        *        *     Request timed out.
    Trace complete.
    C:\>
    I've reset my HH several times over the weekend and am baffled as to how I can somehow have 1 site excluded from my browsing options for no obvious reason other than a suspected internet routing issue.
    My iPhone is on ORANGE and when disabling the wireless connection it too is unable to view the site in question so it's a real pain!
    Not sure where to go to progress this so any help \ guidance is very much appreciated.......
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Appreciate the help....been out for most of the day and checked in to see if any additional posts.
    I tried pinging the site and it does seem to resolve OK and also tried accessing site via IP but same issue - blank white page.
    >ping www.celticquicknews.co.uk
    Pinging www.celticquicknews.co.uk [217.174.253.143] with 32 bytes of data:
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.
    Then tried the telnet command "telnet 217.174.253.143 80" and I do not get any errors and as suggested the command prompt goes blank but no matter what I type I get no errors or response from server 217.174.253.143.
    My IP address has changed from this morning and sadly still same issue for me.
    Internet connection configuration
    Connection Information
    Connection time
    0 days, 10:05:37
    Data Transmitted/Received (MB)
    10.8 / 29.4
    Broadband username
    [email protected]
    Password
    Not configured
    TCP/IP settings
    Broadband network IP address
    86.147.168.198
    Default gateway
    217.32.142.102
    Primary DNS
    194.72.0.114
    Secondary DNS
    62.6.40.162
    The tracert comments make sense so that's helped me understand, thanks for checking that out.
    So what's the best option for me? Am I wasting BT and my own time logging a case?
    I'd not usually bother pursuing this for the sake of a single web site but I'm bemused how this has happened since last week?
    Thanks again for all help and guidance.
    PJ

  • Will a 2 port LAG setup between 2 cisco 200-50s create routing issues?

    I followed this guide. http://sbkb.cisco.com/CiscoSB/GetArticle.aspx?docid=caae365b755f46f5989177cb68216304_Link_Aggregation_on_Cisco_Series_Managed_Switches.xml&pid=2&converted=0 and linked ports 2 and 26 on both switches. Outside IT staff seems to think this will cause routing issues if multiple vlans are not involved.

    Hello,
    VLANs are not required for LAGs to function properly.  Once you configure the LAG members you can configure the LAG as a trunk port with multiple VLANs, and access port with just one, or even a routed port with an IP address on it.
    As long as both sides of the LAG are configured the same way there won't be an issue.  Since these switches are Layer 2 only, they don't even do any kind of routing, so your outside IT may have meant a layer 2 loop, which will happen with multiple connections between the same switches.  But when you configure them as a LAG is treats those links as the same connection, so there is no layer 2 loop either.
    Hope that helps,
    Christopher Ebert - Advanced Network Support Engineer
    Cisco Small Business Support Center
    *please rate helpful posts*

  • Setup a RV180W router for Voip

    How to setup Voip in the RV180W router.
    I need to enable  ports 5060, 5061 (SIP) and Ports 10000 - 20000.
    how do we set the bandwith to high priority for those ports?
    See the attach file, old WRVS4400N configuration
    Tanks

    Wrong forum, post in "small business routers". You can move your post using the actions panel on the right.

  • RV180W Routing Web traffic to Router Interface

    Initially we had a rv110w in place and had problems with the port forwarding stopping a few times a day so we replaced with with a RV180W. Now port forwarding appears to be staying up, however I have a new problem. We host a web page, for some reason when an internal user points the url to the web page it resolves to the web interface of the Router and not the expected web page. If you are outside of the network it resolves to the correct web page. I am not sure why this is happening as it didn't happen with the RV110W or the PIX before that.
    Thanks
    Jeremy

    Hi Jeremy, thank you for using our forum, my name is Johnnatan I am part of the Small business Support community. I just want to say thank you for your contribution that will be really helpful for all forum users.
    I think there is another way to resolve this issue, creating a second forward rule from the LAN to the destiny, I will share with you a document of forwarding steps, you can see it bellow:
    http://www6.nohold.net/CiscoSB/Loginr.aspx?login=1&pid=2&app=search&vw=1&articleid=2865
    I hope you find this answer useful
    “Please rate useful posts so other users can benefit from it”
    Greetings, 
    Johnnatan Rodriguez Miranda.
    Cisco Network Support Engineer.

  • RV180W WIFI Issues

    I have an RV180W that performs perfect for wired hosts and even remote IPSEC clients.
    When clients are using Wi-Fi everything falls apart.
    Clients as close as 10 feet away have trouble getting out to the internet.  The problem is not consistent. Hosts will work for hours or days and then start failing.
    I have the Wi-Fi set with AES channel 1. I have tested the area for other Wi-Fi signals that may interfere. I live in a remote area so there are no neighbors Wi-Fi to interfere. In fact the only wireless devices is the router.
    When sitting next to the router the signal strength is -40 when 10 feet or more the signal drops to -70. At some times it disappears off the wifi analyzer screen.
    This problem seems to have worsened after upgrading to the latest firmware 1.0.3.10

    Hello Lawrence, 
    May want to try and give further detail information on this issue. How do you have the wireless set up. What channel do you have it set to, what type of security are you using, what type of cards those your devices have (G or N for example).
    I was using a RV180w for a while for my wireless but moved on to a WAP371 for the 5ghz AC speeds sense I have a NAS that constantly records network cameras. I have to say the wireless on the RV180w isn't the greatest (the range seems to be not that best) but never experienced a moment were the wireless was unusable. I would have to say I do live in an apartment complex so at times I would run into wireless issues but that was because of so many people around me that was on the same 2.4ghz channels, the big reason why I got a 5.0 ghz band access point to avoid that issue. I also have RV180w installed at my aunts place with 0 problems with the wifi and I also have about 4 cameras that connects to the wifi with no problem. 
    There are times I felt something was weird about the unit I had though but was never enough to look for a RMA/replacement. If you still in warranty with your router you may want to try call Cisco Small business support and have a ticket open with them for them to check on the settings and to see if they can further assist and maybe go down the route of an replacement if you feel like the wireless is unusable. There could be something hardware wise wrong with your wireless because I remember the first RV180w I ever bought the antenna was broke and I had to get it swapped out (which was through newegg and not cisco).
    I hope this helps you out and gets you in the right direction. 

Maybe you are looking for