RV320 DHCP

Hi,
I have configured LAN port 4 to VLAN 4 and disabled the DHCP for this VLAN, after setting the DNS server to "Use DNS from ISP".
I can't use DHCP relay, as I don't know the DHCP server from the service provider.
The objective is to get the device connected to LAN port 4 an IP address from the service provider (WAN1) while devices on the other LAN ports are served by router's DHCP (which works fine by the way).
Although I have excluded LAN 4 from the default VLAN (1), the device is still getting an IP address from the routers DHCP.
What am I doing wrong ?
Christophe

> basically bridging LAN4 to the WAN...
yes, but I am afraid that RV320 doesn't support such thing. simply you have to use switch ( 5-8 ports non managable switch is enough) and connect it between ISP and RV320. And put your TV to that switch so it can reach ISP network directly and receive desired address.
> I can't use DHCP relay, as I don't know the DHCP server from the service provider.
Even if you know IP of ISP DHCP server, DHCP relay function will not work like you expected and you will not receive any IP address for TV box. The reason is that DHCP relay is adding gateway IP (i.e. it's own IP address of receiving interface) into DHCP request (giaddr field of the DHCP packet) which point DHCP server to look for free IP from correct DHCP IP address pool. And because of that giaddr field, DHCP request did not match any existing IP pool (yes, because DHCP server did not recognize your internal subnet in it's own database) and no any DHCP offer will be provided...

Similar Messages

  • RV320 DHCP and WAN questions

    Hello all,
    So far I love the RV320 its super fast and works really good (with 2 WAN connections).          
    I though have a few questions hoping someone could tell me:
    1) Under DHCP Server it gives the option of to use DNS from ISP or DNS Proxy, what is the main difference between those two options?
    Right now I have this set to DNS from ISP.
    2) What are the pros and cons of enabling IPV6 DHCP and what is the best setting for that (Yes both ISPs I have suppor IPV6)?
    3) What is the best option to set as client lease time for DHCP? (its set to 1440 default).
    4) On the System Summary page I see both WAN1 and WAN2 connected (i set it to
    Load Balance (Auto Mode) but for WAN2 i always see: Connected (Inactive)
    Why does it say inactive?
    Thank you!

    Found answers to most things now except for:
    4) On the System Summary page I see both WAN1 and WAN2 connected (i set it to
    Load Balance (Auto Mode) but for WAN2 i always see: Connected (Inactive)
    Why does it say inactive?

  • RV320: DHCP Option 82 + DHCP relay at Ethernet switch

    We purchased a RV320 router and want to use the DHCP Option 82 IP Assignment in combination with a ZyXEL GS1910-24 Smart Managed Switch.
    The switch is able to insert Option 82 Circuit-IDs into DHCP requests, if they are relayed to a specific DHCP server. So there must be configured exactly one IP address of the DHCP server in the switch configuration (eg 192.168.1.1). The problem is, that the RV320 creates different IP subnets for different Circuit-IDs. So the RV320-router has multiple IPs, one unique IP per subnet (192.168.1.1, 192.168.2.1, 192.168.3.1, ...).
    How can I use the Option 82 IP assignment with this configuration?
    Is a routing/firewall rule at the RV320 a solution (to forward DHCP requests from subnet specific IP - eg 192.168.3.1 - to exactly one IP, eg 192.168.1.1)?

    mpyhala,
    seems not to work as the RV320 is restricted to 6 custom VLANs (+ 1 Management VLAN with ID 1).
    Maybe I should describe the whole scenario, which should be implemented:
    The configuration is like for a small hotel: each room should be logically seperated from each other (no inter-room traffic for security) and each rooms bandwidth should be managed.
    Bandwidth management at the RV320 relies on IP addresses. So I need to achieve somehow, that a room (= port number on switch) is always assigned a specific IP address.
    14 rooms should be covered in that way.
    The problem is currently the link IP<->Switch Port. I thought DHCP option 82 is the way to go, but VLANs (one VLAN for each room) may be also a solution. Unfortunately none of the two ways work.
    What can be a solution? Was the RV320 the wrong decision (not enough flexibility)?
    Thanks.

  • RV320 DHCP server

    Serial Number:
    Firmware Version:
    v1.1.1.06 (2013-12-06, 11:02:37)
    PID VID:
    RV320 V01
    Dear sir,
    I got a issues, I have configure 2 VLAN on RV-320, VLAN 1 i have disable the DHCP, VLAN 25 i have configure DHCP Server enabled, but it seem DHCP bind on VLAN 25 is not working, then i try to config the static IP on device testing the VLAN is working, successful separate broadcast domain. and i can pint the VLAN 25 IP address, on DHCP i have re-enable VLAN 1 DHCP Server, it also working, successful assign the ip address to dynamic host.
    any advise on my issues?
    Thanks,

    echolai@califor,
    i had vlan disabled and vlan untagged for my RV320 in the lab, which would not hand out ip address for a different vlan. At this point at your earliest convenience open a support case so an engineer can look at the configuration in your router. If you like i can take a look at your config. Just send config to PM.

  • RV320 slow DHCP

    We have a RV320 router. To our knowledge, we use it with out-of-the-box setings, all clients get the LAN ip-address via DHCP from the RV320.
    The problem is the time it takes for the RV320 to hand out an ip-adress, it takes between 1-2 minutes, both in the case when a new client is connected and in the case when a client is re-booting and initates a new request.
    We are usung the latest firmware v1.1.1.06.

    I Martin,
    We have same problem with RV320. There are only about 20 APs requiring an IP. Most of the times, the APs reboots.
    Tried also with RV180. Analysed with wireshark, the clients lauched DHCP requests 5 times before RV started to answer. If the client (APs in this case) have a timeout for getting IP, then reboot themselfs most of the times before the RV routers started to respond.
    Thanks in advance,
    Raúl.

  • RV320 Question about IPv6 DHCP

    Hello everyone,
    Been running the RV320 for quite some time but now I also want to use IPv6 support for all clients and to the net. On WAN1 I have a fiber connection to my ISP who gave me a bunch of IPv6 adresses and IPv4 (IPv4 already being configured and working!).
    Now all clients for IPv4 locally use 192.168.1.x and ofc i have set some external IPv4 adresses to internal IPv4 adresses by using One-to-One NAT.
    I want to setup IPv6 DHCP on our network aswell and went to DHCP setup > IPv6 and then clicked DHCP SERVER.
    I filled in these fields:
    IPv6 adress: fc00::1
    Prefix length: 7
    DHCP Server and for DNS the google's:
    2001:4860:4860::8888
    Should that be it? Or do i also need to configure the IPv6 Address Pool Table stuff? And if so, how?
    I basically want the same as IPv4, so just internal IPv6 adresses which should translate to the outside just like with IPv4.
    Also under WAN1 i have WAN Connection Settings:
    What shouldb e filled in under: LAN IPv6 Address: ?? i have :: right now there.
    Can anyone help me?

    Hello Michiel,
    The following link has some useful information about setting up DHCPv6 server on RV320.
    http://sbkb.cisco.com/CiscoSB/ukp.aspx?vw=1&docid=5d6de1bfe4c1488fb51b75cb76dd0ef6_DHCPv6_Configuration_and_Monitoring_on_RV320_Router.xml&pid=2&respid=0&snid=9&dispid=0&cpage=search
    Also, the admin guide (Chapter 3, Page 19) provides some good information about IPv6 support on the RV320, especially around DHCP-PD. If the Service provider supports DHCP-PD (prefix delegation), then you can just enable the feature on RV320 and the clients behind the router (including LAN interface on the router) get IP address directly through the ISP.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Nagaraja

  • Time-out problems with RV320 (after upgrade from RV042)

    config:
    dual wan
    WAN1: 4G router (DHCP) - approx 25Mbit/ 8Mbit
    WAN2: PPOE (DSL) - 1 Mbit/ 0.2 Mbit
    worked with a RV042 before and upgraded to a RV320 now.
    all other things are unchanged.
    3 problems - 2 solved/ not critical - one still open:
    a) not critical:  DHCP Status does not include all devices (changing view - but all-time problem)
    I would suspect a software bug.... DHCP itself works perfectly/ IPs are assigned (just not shown in status)
    b) solved (at least for now):  internet connection featured time-outs; after many tries, disabling the SPI in the firewall helped
    btw: this only happend for the WAN1 - WAN2 worked  (or is that slow that the additonal wait time did not matter ;-)
    c) very annoying: exchange connection (from Outlook client to external exchange) still has time-outs (mostly the whole mail client hangs/ ends to be restarted).
    As soon as I disable WAN1, it works!  But it´s not the LTE WAN itself - switching back to the RV042 does not show the same symptom.
    I tried: include IP into local DNS (in general I work with google DNS servers - but changing that does not help either), opening all traffic for teh realevant IPs and disabling the firewall completely.  no positive results....
    thanks for any hints....

    I agree with you on a, probably a bug of some sort.
    b is an issue I've seen before, and even on similar bandwidth (25/5) on my rv016.  What was able to figure out is that the carrier (ISP) is sending about 4k/sec of ICMP packets to the router, which in turn makes the router think it's under attack so it drops the connection.  As you can tell, disabling the SPI helps.  For me, putting another router in front of my rv016 (on 2 of 3 wans) was my only 'permanent' solution.
    c sounds like there's a protocol binding/static route in the rv042 that you need to add to the rv320.  I'd check that first.
    Huntsville's Premiere Car and Bike e-magazine: www.huntsvillecarscene.com

  • RV320 Bug - Service Management Table (Port Forwarding)

    I'm unable to add more than 16 entries for port forwarding.
    It's a RV320 on v1.1.1.06 (newest to date) and it doesn't accept more than 16 entries in the "Service Management Table" required for port forwarding. As soon as I try to enter number 17 and hit save the window closes like it always does but you can see for a short time it says "Critical failure. Please contact support." Everything else works, except for the entry in the Service Management Table. I'm also unable to use it in the port forwarding section, it just doesn't save the entry. I'm unable to add any services to the list unless I delete others but it only works again until number 16.
    Actually the "limit" is 37 because it comes with 21 services entered out of the box.
    I couldn't find any bug reporting website that I could use without a contract. So I seek for help here.
    Anybody else having this issue or is it just my device?

    10 days ago a post was made in https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12353771/cannot-manage-service-list-all-waited-unacceptably-long-fix  indicating there is a new firmware in beta test, I've contacted support to try to get a copy.
    I'm moving off Draytek, have a 2830 with latest firmware and various weird issues that they've confirmed are bugs but cannot provide a due date for fix. DHCP randomly giving out wrong DNS server addresses, tagged VLAN support flaky and giving out DHCP details from wrong VLAN (worked around using 1 cable from switch per VLAN and using port based VLAN rather than tagged), App Enforcement for IM blocking causing SMTP and Live.com login issues. And that's just what cropped up last week with the unit at work here. Still using it for our live router as we can't put the RV320 in place until we can configure all the required ACLs which needs more than 16 service entries.

  • RV320 and RV325 Feature Request

    Hello Cisco Small Business Community.  
    We are a Cisco Select Partner and have started using RV320's and RV325's with our customers.  As we are implementing these deployments, I have noticed there are a few features I would like to see added to the product.  I've listed them below.
    Urgently Needed Feature Requests:
    1.  Allow a subnet mask in the 255.255.0.0 range for LAN VLAN's.  Many of our customers use a 10.x.x.x range for subnets and many use a 16 bit subnet mask to give them plenty of room to create both static and dynamic assignments.  For example, subnet 10:  10.10.0.0/16 with a range of 10.10.10.1-254 for dhcp dynamic leases, and 10.10.0.1-254 for servers, and 10.10.1.1-254 for printers, and 10.10.2.1-254 for networking gear, etc.  None of these networks have more than 254 devices on them, but the extra IP range availability is nice because it allows us to help keep their networks organized.
    2. The ability to create service groups for firewall and NAT rule creation.  There are often times when we need to group several services together and create firewall and NAT rules for them.  This would simplify setup and implementation.  An example of this feature on Cisco Small Business Products was on the ISA550.
    3.  The ability to have the RV320/325 to serve as the NTP server for the network.  Most small business customers need NTP server functionality, and the logical place to stick this service for many of these networks is on the firewall.
    4.  The ability to specify any RFC DHCP option.  We have some need to be able to specify several additional DHCP options than the ones hard coded into the firewall dhcp server pages.  In addition to the options the DHCP servers on the RV320/325 already includes, the common ones that we often use are "Time Server," "Log Server," and "Time Offset."
    6.  The ability to specify a domain search list and for DHCP clients.
    7.  The option to register DHCP clients with the specified DNS server (including the on-box DNS Forwarder).
    8.  The ability to tweak Firewall Session Settings (like in the RV220w and ISA550) and TCP/UDP Timeouts.  If full control is not an option, then may four choices such as:  "Conservative" -- keeps TCP/UDP connections alive for the longest period of time, "Normal" -- normal TCP/UDP Timeouts, High Latency -- Keep TCP/UDP connections alive for a longer period of time.
    9.  Additional Diagnostic/status screen information:  -- CPU usage for 1 minute, 5 minutes, and 15 minutes, -- number of Firewall Sessions/States, --Firewall Temperature, -- Real Time and RRD based traffic graphs for 15 minutes, 4 hours, 8 hours, 1 day, and 1 week, 
    10.  The ability to pull Firmware Updates directly from the Cisco support site onto the firewall.
    Nice to Have Features:
    1.  VRRP on both WAN and LAN interfaces.
    2.  The ability to answer DNS helper requests.  What I mean is to be able to set the on-box DHCP server up to serve as the DHCP server for non-connected subnets
    3.  SSH and Telnet command line access for basic troubleshooting (top, pftop, nbtstat, reboot, etc.)
    4.  The ability to backup and restore parts of the Config file, e.g. just the VPN setup or just the firewall rules
    5.  OSPF Dynamic Routing Support
    With some of the advanced features, I wouldn't mind needing to buy a perpetual "advanced" license for an extra $50 to $100 (e.g. for VRRP, OSPF, SSH access, etc.).
    I hope to hear some responses back from Cisco Product Support on these items. 

    Hello vreid47362,
    I'm quite a bit surprised to see that we have both the same idea: provide our feedbacks to cisco to increase our product usage.
    Here's mine list:
    Custom services
    - I was a bit surprised when I have seen for the first time the embedded services list : there is some that I'm sure that nobody use (HTTP and HTTPS secondary), and some usefull network protocols which are missing : NTP, NNTP, NFS, SAMBA, BONJOUR, SSDP, etc.
    It could be interesting to start router with those embedded services.
    - An option to select both the TCP and UDP services could be very usefull : for now, when we add a service, we have to specify protocol in the following list : TCP, UDP, IPV6.
    If I wants to add a rule for NFS without take care of TCP and UDP, I have to set up :
    - two custom services, one for UDP, one for TCP
    - two custom rules, one for NFS TCP, one for NFS UDP.
    If we have two networks or VLAN, we have to define 4 rules...
    - Increase the custom service description length could be helpfull : for now it's a problem if we wants to add more than 11 characters.
    - If we add a custom service by error, we are unable to remove the generated field : field say that it expect something. if we do not wants to loose previous fields set, we have to save it with false values, and delete after it. Just boring. 
    Setting up firewall rules for the first time
    - The "View logs" button is located on the bottom of the log tab; if we wants to view logs, we have to scroll : it's very boring when we're setting up our rules : we have to go to the firewall tab, and if there is something wrong, we need to go to log tab and scroll.
    If you add a shortcut to the log from the firewall rules tab could be very usefull.
    Managing firewall rules on the time
    - Be able to add a description of the rules defined could be helpfull : I've set all my rules now, but in few months when I'll come back to the interface, I'm not sure to understand all meaning. A description to explain the rule's object could be usefull.
    - If we log something in the firewall logs and if we want to remove the a logging trace type, we have to pass on each rules we think it can log something. It could be interesting to view logging option from the grid: it'll help us to earn time.
    - Be able to filter rules by VLAN, protocol, ports or the rule's logging state from the rules grid could be helpfull.
    Double Wan management
    - Add an autodetect feature for the available bandwith could be very helpfull : accoding with values detected, you can help to configure more easily the router
    Double wan protocol binding and multiples VLAN
    - When I set up the protocols binding configuration I'm was very boring to have to set up rules for all outgoing protocol rules a interface : for example,  wants to set up all outgoing SMTP protocol on the WAN1 interface, we have to select SMTP and add 1.1.1.1 au 223.255.255.254. If we have multiples VLAN, we have to repeat this rule for each VLAN subnet mask…
    Set up an option for all outgoing traffic could be very helpfull.
    DHCP Subnet masks more than 255.255.255.x
    Like vreid47362 said, I'm also interested in this feature: For now, subnet masks defined for the DHCP Vlan are provided from a preconfigured select box. If we wants to choose something other than those provided, we can't. It could be interesting to add own own subnet mask (like for example 255.255.0.0).
    Kind regards
    David

  • RV042G vs RV320

    Hello all,
    Can someone pls explain to me the difference between these 2 models? cause i definitely cannot find it anywhere apart from 900mbps vs 800mbps in NAT.
    Basically I need the best of them for Dual Gigabit WAN + DHCP to LAN, no need for VPN.
    Any idea?
    Thank you all!

    Hi Michiel,
    The difference between RV042G and RV320 are as follows:
    1. IPSec VPN thrpoughput for RV042 is  75Mbps where for RV320 it is 100 Mbps.
    2. PPTP VPN connectio  for RV042G is 5 where for RV320 it is 10.
    And please refer to the data sheet to know more detail.
    RV320 Data sheet -
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps10907/ps9923/ps11997/data_sheet_c78-726132_ps9923_Products_Data_Sheet.html
    RV042G Data sheet -
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps10907/ps9923/ps12262/data_sheet_c78-706724.html
    Thank you.

  • RV320: Need to use as gateway for multiple subnets

    We just purchased an RV320 as a replacement/upgrade to an RV042. Our Internet connection was upgraded to 200Mbps and the RV042 wouldn't handle that throughput.
    Our internal network has 4 subnets, all connected via a layer 3 switch. The RV320 is connected to one of those subnets and is the default gateway for the entire network.
    The RV042 had a "multiple subnets" setting that allowed it to perform NAT for the directly connected subnet and the other 3 subnets in our network. We would just add the other networks to the list in the RV042 and everything was fine.
    The RV320 doesn't seem to have the same functionality (or am I missing something?). It looks like there is some sort of multiple subnet support, but when we try to add another subnet the interface seems to be asking us to define a single IP address in that subnet (an IP address for the router?) as if all subnets will be directly attached to the router using VLANs (which is not the case in our network).
    We can set up the "advanced routing" option to define the other 3 internal subnets and how to route to them, etc. but will the RV320 perform NAT for the other subnets without any adidtional configuration?
    Can anyone shed any light on this?
    Many thanks!

    Precept,
    My name is Ismael, iam with Small Business Support Center. I like to start by asking is there a  particular reason that the switch is handling Layer 3/or DHCP? Normally when an RV042 is implemented you would need a Layer 3 switch as the RV042 only supports one DHCP scope.In addition all The RV0XX series does not support 802.1q VLAN.
    With RV320 you can setup multiple subnets under advance routing and still allow for it to pass DHCP for all of your 4 subnets and create 801.2q Vlan subinterfaces . Setting RV320 in this manner can create an ease in managing the network.
    If you are considering the RV320 to do Layer 3 / DHCP simply create your 4 Vlans or subnets. Add them to the DHCP scope and enable DHCP server for all subnets. Switch would have to be configured to Layer 2 for this to work.  The link below is a knowledge portal that could assist in creating DHCP and Vlans. Hope this helps you.
    http://sbkb.cisco.com/

  • RV320 new firmware?

    Hi
    My RV320, which works ok in general (1.1.1.06), but I also experience the one or other bug mentioned in this support forum.
    I do not know if the device is still safe, because last December 2013 the latest software release for the device went out and since then nothing happened about new features and bug fixes. Nearly one year without any code changes. 
    Is the device still safe? And when the next firmware will be released (ssh cli, sha-256, mtu fix, etc.)?
    Greets, Oliver

    Sure.  Didn't want a repeat of my experience with the RV320... so did quite a bit of research.  Ended up going with TP-Link's TL-ER5120.  Although it's pegged as a "load-balancing" router, I don't have that feature enabled.  I bought it for the processor and extra memory.  Performance has been rock-solid.  Install was pretty quick... only exception was their procedure to reserve IPs via DHCP is split into two parts.  Took a bit to figure out.  First you bind the MACs, then you import the list into DHCP Reservation.  Let me know if you have ques... good luck!

  • CISCO RV320

    How can I configure a CISCO RV320 to make of use of 5 IPs assigned from my ISP. I want to be able to use Network Port Address Translation to host services and translate these to my private IP Address space. For example, public IP addresss to private IP Address on port 443.                  

    Hola, 
    Siento mucho que este teniendo problemas con su dispositivo.
    Si le entiendo correctamente, usted menciona que esta usando el router para proveer direcciones IP en un parque. Me imagino que hay mucha gente usando dispositivos connectandose a su señal y es posible que testen usando muchas direcciones IP.
    Ha usted revisado la tabla de DHCP para ver cuantas direcciones estan en uso? Es posible que el router haya llegado a la maxima capacidad de direciones que puede proveer y cuando usted lo reinicia, la tabla de DHCP se vacia y comienza el proceso de nuevo.
    Quiza pueda cambiar el tiempo por el que cada direccion IP es asignada. El asignado por defecto es 440 minutos (24 Horas), a lo mejor lo puede cambiar a 60 minutes asi si alguien ya no esta usando la direcccion entonces esta queda disponible par ser reusada.
    Para cambiar el tiempo del lease vaya a DHCP, DHCP setup y luego cambie el DHCP lease time a 60.
    Por favor, dejenos saber si esto ayuda.

  • RV320 vs 1921/1941

    Hello all,
    I was wondering, what is the biggest difference between the RV320 and 1921/1941 cisco series routers?
    Is throughput higher on 1921 series or same as rv320? Im basically looking for best GUI/Best performance router for upto 100 clients.
    I dont need VPN perse, i dont need VOIP or any other things it basically just needs to do DHCP, DNS and NAT plus gigabit ofc.
    Im noticing with the RV320, performance goes down a lot when you enable QoS services.
    Greetings!

    Im basically looking for best GUI/Best performance router for upto 100 clients.
    If you like GUI, then 1921/1941 isn't going to be your "cup of tea".  These routers are mostly CLI.  Sure there are limited GUI functionality but a lot of us prefer CLI because there are more functions/features available with CLI than GUI.

  • RV320 Dual WLAN Setup

    Hello I bought an RV320 Router and a WAP371 AP. I am trying to setup my Network with a private LAN, and a private WLAN for the business as well as a Guest WLAN for customers.
    I am trying to setup 2 VLAN.
    VLAN1 (192.168.1.1 /24) : for managing the router
    VLAN20 (192.168.2.1 /24) : for my private network
    VLAN30 (192.168.3.1 .24) : for my guest network
    I do not want the router to broadcast DHCP to VLAN20 because I have a DHCP server already.
    The problem I am having is that I am not able to receive IP addresses on my Wireless clients.

    Hello edgard409,
    Thank you for using the Cisco Small Business Support Community!
    Would you be able to provide any additional information about your topology, including how you have your VLAN memberships configured on your RV320?
    In the meantime, I've also found a few articles in our Knowledge Base that will hopefully help guide you through the process of setting up the DHCP server on VLANs 1 and 30, and disabling it on 20 (located here), and on setting up your VLAN memberships (located here).
    I hope this helps you out, and if you experience further issues, please reply back and we'll do our best to find a solution to solve your problem! If this post resolves your issue, please remember to mark your question as resolved and rate to help other community members with similar issues. Thanks!
    Best,
    Gunner

Maybe you are looking for