RV320 Max WAN-LAN Throughput

Hi,
I have a RV320 here on a 500/500Mbit fiber line, and don't seem to get more than ~230Mbit througput.
If I connect the original modem from the provider, I get 500/500Mbit throughput.
Firewall is off while testing.
Does the RV320 not provide more throughput, or can it be a setting?

@Marty, I tried it but didn't matter in speed.
Tested serveral times with the Cisco (230Down/130Up) vs Arcadyan(480Down/480Up), but they stay the same no matter the settings.
Also tried to change the MTU, to see if that had any effect, only effect was that the WAN connection didn't work anymore

Similar Messages

  • SR520 WAN-LAN Throughput

    Can the SR520 actually sustain full WAN bandwidth to the LAN ports?
    I have a client that's just pulled a Cogent fiber service guaranteed at 100mbps. He's wanting me to spec a small biz router that will ensure he gets "what he's paying for "--full 100 mbps at the LAN.
    I had a Cisco online person say they've recommended this SR520 to others with 100mbps service, but I see no spec or even partner information or data that I can point to for W-L throughput numbers?
    Any help would be appreciated!
    BTW, if there's another small biz option that is still simple, we can suggest that, too.
    Chet_P

    Hi Chet,
    Thanks for using the Small Business Support Community.
    Although the SR520 has an Fast Ethernet WAN interface, it is unlikely to be able to forward internet traffic at 100Mbps.
    Ultimately maximum forwarding rates will depend on the type of features you wish to use.
    In terms of small business products, the SRP541 might offer the performance levels you require in this case.
    Andy

  • RV320 - Dual WAN - Load Balance Problem

    Hi all,
    I've just bought a RV320 Dual WAN router an try to get it running. My network setup looks lice the picture attached.
    I have 2 WAN Connections:
    - Router 1 (16Mbit Down / 512kbit up) - no public WAN IP
    - Router 2 (3 Mbit Down / 512kbit up) - Fixed public IP
    Router 1 ist connected to WAN1 and router 2 to WAN2 port on the RV320.
    I have enabled load balancing mode.
    Qustions:
    1.
    I want WAN1 to be the primary line to be used until capacity reached.
    Currently for some reason I don't understand the cisco always uses WAN2.
    That's not good as all browsing and downloading is limited to 3mbit.
    When I switch to "fail-over" mode and set primry live to WAN1 that works, but WAN2 is not kept alive.
    2.
    I am using VOIP and need to route all VOIP traffic to WAN2 interface.
    The best would be to tell the router IP 192.168.177.9 (voip phone) should use WAN2. So far I didn't figure out how to do that.
    Can I put VOIP into one VLAN group and allocated VLAN to one specific WAN interface?
    Brgds

    So, you can hear the phone ringing and answer it? which means that SIP pakets are coming through WAN to LAN and well redirected to the phone IP, but you cannot hear after that, which means that there could be a problem with the RTP packets. 
    If you have problem only with the incoming calls and not the outgoing, than try enable/disable SIP ALG (Firewall). If that doesn't fix the issue, try to allow (or even forward) from WAN to LAN RDP -  UDP ports 16384-32767 to the phone IP.
    Regards,
    Kremena

  • Disable auto switching WAN/LAN/WI-FI

    Hi,
    I want 2 lan card on same laptop therfore I purchased USB lan card when i connect lan cable to Gigabit ethernet the USB lan automatically get disconnected i also tried with diffrent profile but no success Please let me know the steps how to disable the the auto switching WAN/LAN/WI-FI so i can access both USB Lan and Gigabit Lan.

    If you enter device manager, right click, and select Scan for hardware changes, is the wireless adapter detected?
    You may want to start by installing the latest drivers available from HP for your device. Some notebooks will have a separate driver set for buttons and switches that may re-enable this functionality, or an updated driver for the wireless adapter may include
    updates that allow the adapter to be seen following the automatic switch.
    Brandon
    Windows Outreach Team- IT Pro
    Windows for IT Pros on TechNet

  • Cisco RV320 DUAL WAN router USB setup with Telstra 4G MF823

    I am trying to setup Cisco RV320 DUAL WAN router to work with my prepaid Telstra 4G MF823 device. Could you please assist. My settings are as follows: InterfaceUSB2Connection Type:3G/4G PIN Code:Confirm PIN Code:USB Connection Status:3G/4G modem is not available.Access Point Name:telstra.internetDial Number:Username:Password:Enable DNSDNS Server (Required): 8.8.8.8DNS Server (Optional): 8.8.4.4MTU:AutoManualB

    Hi oz000,
    Unfortunately we don't have anyone here to assist with this particular issue. Our team here provides assistance for the device standalone, we ensure that the 4G device connects to the network and functions correctly on its own.
    -Matt W
     

  • WRVS4400N WAN-LAN-WAN Performance

    Hi
    i'm searching for a router that can handle Gbit Connections. that means, ich hab 1 gbit port from my provider and i want to use more than 1 device --> router
    at this page: 
    http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/component/option,com_chart/Itemid,189/chart,121/
    the rvs4000 where tested, but the wan->lan performance was poor.
    i saw at the release notes of an firmware update, that this problem was fixed.
    is the WRVS4400 and the RVS4000 the same device but with WLAN ?
     quackie

    All of the Linksys Business series products are now part of the Cisco Small Business product line.
    You can find everything here at Cisco.com
    Products
    http://www.cisco.com/go/smallbiz
    Cisco Small Business Support Community
    https://www.myciscocommunity.com/community/smallbizsupport?view=overview

  • Bonjour | WAN | LAN - Broadcast

    This may turn out to be an RTFM and if so, please say so.
    I have a private local network, with several macs - all previously hiding behind a Netgear WGT624v3.
    I had the G4 AGP running OS X.4.10 on my private local network - not running OD (just sharepoints), it offered Software Update Services (SUS) (I used Software Update Enabler to point the clients to server.local:8080 for the updates). All worked fine.
    I have now set up the Server X.4.10 as the DNS/DHCP/NAT for my network using the Gateway Assistant and additional ethernet PCI cards.
    So the server is bridging the WAN/LAN.
    My problem is that server.local:8080 address seems to be linked to the WAN, not the LAN - although serving from the LAN
    - I can reach the SUS via 192.168.2.1, the LAN router address, but not the Bonjour address.
    I suspected a problem with the DNS, but server.local:80 takes about 120-180 seconds to find the http service and does.
    Server.local:8080 always times out.
    I thought Gateway Assistant would be able to setup the services without needing additional steps - what else is needed?
    There doe not seem to be any documentation on this issue.
    Any help appreciated.
    Powerbook G4 1.33 15, many G4 AGP's, etc.   Mac OS X (10.4.10)  

    If you're running NAT the firewall is also running and it's probably what's blocking Bonjour multicast DNS traffic.
    Found this here http://macenterprise.org/content/view/124/77/
    #Allow Rendezvous packets (mDNS Responder)
    allow udp from any 5353 to any in via en0 keep-state
    #Multicast packet required by Rendezvous
    allow ip from any to 224.0.0.251 out via en0 keep-state
    Depending on the firewall rules in action (sudo ipfw list) you might also have problems with DNS lookups from LAN clients -> WAN DNS servers (ISP?).
    If you have a DNS running in the server and you use it for LAN clients DNS lookups should work anyway...

  • RV320 WAN & LAN limits

                       Hi,
    I would like to get some helpfull claryfication, (new to this dev). 
    1.  WAN interface:   ports support untag mode only, but is it passing tags to/from other devices, middleman?
    2.  LAN port:  is there a way to configure LAG or just clean STP redundancy over two LAN ports connected to two separate Cisco switches (them themselves setup with LAG?  The same subnet or VLAN on both rv320 eth ports? 
    I am trying to get some redundancy/failover on LAN ports b/c router wil be used with redundant switches.
    Andrew

    Hi,
    1. WAN interface supports untag mode only. This means packets from LAN to WAN will be natted as untagged. Packets coming on the WAN port needs to be untagged or will be dropped
    2. LAN ports - do not support LAG and STP
    Regards,
    Kremena

  • RV320 two wan and wifi

    Hi,
    just buy a RV320 and I have both wan configured to failover.
    Wan1 has fix ip and Wan2 has dynamic ip.
    I would like to know if i can configure one router to provide WIFI. I tried to create a VLAN in Cisco and isolate wifi but does not work. The router is in bridge mode.
    I hope someone can guide me to solve this problem.
    thank you very much
    pd: sorry for my english but is not my mother tongue....

    Hi Marty,
    thank you for your answer.
    This my configuration:
    default Vlan: 172.16.0.1
    Vlan2: 192.168.2.1
    WAN1: 217.172.x.x
    WAN2: dinamic ip PPPoE
    The switch is connected to port Lan 1 and an old router to port Lan 2 to provide wifi on an isolated network.
    The router has not a special configuration, ip: 192.168.2.2, wifi, dhcp with default gateway 192.168.2.1
    i can connect to wifi but i can not ping to 192.168.2.1
    any help would be appreciated

  • RV320 EasyVPN - No LAN access

    Recently changed equipment from an ASA5505 to the RV320 (not happy with the move) due to a necessity for the dual WAN option. All has been well until I went to configure the VPN. I'm using the EasyVPN option, all settings match our previous VPN setup (tunnel name, password, interface) and the connection to the VPN works, however there is no way of accessing the LAN, no SSH, no RDP, no intranet, etc. The only thing that does work is the access to the internet.
    Summary page shows a Virtual range of 40.10-40.50 and a local group of 10.0/24.
    Any help? What am I missing?

    Hi Jlink,
    What is the ipconfig on the workstation when connected? you can also try tracert [ip address of the remote host] to see if the traffic actually goes via VPN.
    Regards,
    Aleksandra

  • RV320 loosing WAN and inter VLAN connectivity

    I just received a new RV320 V01 router and I am having trouble with the router loosing WAN and inter VLAN connectivity. Anywhere from 2 to 24+ hours the router will stop routing traffic to/from the WAN and other VLANs on the network. I have a ping trace running on one system and all packets are lost when the routing fails to all WAN connections and systems on other VLANs. I am still able to ping all of the router address for the VLANs i.e. 192.168.1.1, 192.168.2.1, 192.168.3.1 etc. Unfortunately I only have one system on this VLAN so I do not know if I can ping other systems on the same VLAN. I also do not have any DNS resolution when the issue occurs.
    The router is set up using a single ISP connection on WAN1 using DHCP assignment. WAN2 is disabled in the router settings. The router has version v1.1.1.06 firmware. I have also tried disabling VPN pass-through as noted from other posts. When the issue occurs the WAN1 connection is showing as “Connected (Inactive)” with no assigned IP address, gateway or DNS servers. The router is in gateway mode and everything works fine until the problem.
    Any Ideas?

    You noted that the WAN 1 connection has no IP address when this occurs.
    When it occurred last, I noted the "Connected (Inactive)" on WAN1 and that there were no IP addresses assigned.  I have a screen shot of the page attached.  I had noticed the "Connected (Inactive)" previously when the problem was occurring but cannot definitely say there were no IP addresses at that time.  I do not recall if I noticed this before or after I had disconnected the WAN1 to test a direct PC to modem connection.  I did check with the cable company and there are no issues being noted or logged on my connection.  The direct PC to modem connection worked fine.
    What type of Internet connection is it? (Cable, DSL, T1, etc)
    The connection is Cable
    Is the WAN port configured for DHCP?
    The WAN port is configured for DHCP
    Who is the ISP?
    The ISP is the local cable company
    When the issue occurs, can devices within a subnet ping each other?
    As I noted in the original post, at the time I was on a VLAN that only had one system running to monitor ping traces.  I will try again next time the problem occurs to have multiple devices on the same network.
    Are there any switches in the network?
    Yes, there is a switch in the system.  I am using a cisco SG200-26.  However, the problem persists even when I directly connected a PC to the active LAN port on the router.  No issue when the PC was dirrectly connected to the modem.
    Can you draw a simple topology showing the network with IP addresses, VLANs, etc?
           See attached

  • Problem with Jabber and file transfers WAN - LAN-Users - a solution!

    Hi,
    I read a lot of messages about problems with file transfers between iChat-Users, if one (or both) are behind a NAT.
    I had this problem to and found an easy solution:
    My situation
    iChat-Server behind a Netgear ProSafe FireWall. I opened the needed Ports including Port 7777 (the Port for the iChat-proxy (proxy65).
    The iChat-Server is configured to host the domain "server.ourdomain.com" (as an example).
    This address can be reached from the LAN and also from the WAN-side.
    From the LAN-side the DNS redirects to 192.168.1.1, from the WAN this domain redirects to our official IP-address (the WAN-IP of the FireWall).
    I tried nearly all kinds of mentioned solutions, but nothing helped.
    The really easy solution is: I just added our official IP to the "Hosted Domains" in the iChat-section of Server-Admin.
    After that change, the transfers are made via the proxy65 of iChat-Server. The transfers are shown in the log /private/var/jabberd/log/proxy65.log.
    I think, that the other posters who also have this kind of problem are working in a similar setup (domain name of server is used from the LAN AND the WAN-side with different IP-addresses (LAN-IP & WAN-IP).
    This solution will only work, if the WAN-IP is a fixed address.
    svenc

    Until the introduction of file promises in AIR Athena, it  has never been possible to drag remote files out of an AIR application.
    You could refer to the http://www.adobe.com/devnet/air/flex/articles/using_file_promises.html
    Hope this is helpful. Please let me know if I could help more.

  • Home Calendar Server. Need Access via Wan & Lan

    Hi,
    I have just setup my new Mac Mini server 10.8.2. I have configured DNS, DDNS (via no-ip), Open Directory and the Calendar Server. I want to be able to access calender info on my iPhone and MBP at home and on the road. I can access the Calender server from home using myserver.domain.com but this does not work when i´m off my LAN. I can access the calender server on the WAN using domain.com. Is there a way to configure DNS, so that i can use one server address for both LAN & WAN access?
    This has been driving me nuts for a fair few hours now, so thought i´d just ask someone that might know...
    Thanks in advance.

    I am struggling with the same issue. I think I found the answer, but I have not yet tested it.
    My setup is a mini server connected to a Time Capsule to connect to the internet. Time Capsule is set up to let Contacts and Calendar information.
    My domain name is updated through a DNS service.
    If your domain name is registered for DNS as domain.com (A Record), you may need to add a new hostname to your DNS service, creating a new A record, server.domain.com.
    From what I read, this is the most likely issue with the problem you have described. I have been struggling with this for the past few days. I just need to get outside my wifi coverage to see if adding the new A record has fixed it.
    Hope this helps.

  • WAN/LAN IP DHCP Airport Extreme problems

    Hi! I just moved and changed internet provider. Set up my computers and the Airport Extreme (AEBS) and things are a bit different. I used to put an ethernet cable from the wall (ethernet broadband socket) into the WAN port on the AEBS and an ethernet cable from the LAN port on the AEBS into my Ethernet port on the G5. This way I had my Ibooks wireless connected and my G5 with a cable. Worked fine. Now it seems I can't get on the internet with a cable from the wall into the AEBS WAN port. So I have used the LAN port connecting with DHCP instead. Works fine for the wireless Ibooks, but when I hook up the G5 from the AEBS WAN port to the G5 Ethernet port, it says the Ethernet connection has a fixed IP-address an may not be able to connect to the internet. And the printer I had in the network is not responding at all. Does anyone know I can solve this? Best regards Børge

    Hi Børge,
    Were you ever able to resolve your problem? I am having the same issue. For some reason the wireless works fine if I connect an ethernet cable from the DSL router to the LAN port, NOT the WAN part, which is completely backwards. And of course, trying to connect another computer to the AEB via ethernet using the only port left open (the WAN port) does nothing. If you managed to fix it, I'd love to know how.
    -Jp

  • RV320 Additional WAN IP NAT'ing

    Hello, I have an RV 320, my initial IP allocation from my ISP was 38.122.x.x a /30 allocation. Recently I needed to NAT a device so I requested a /29 block from my ISP the new block is 38.79.x.x. The router is fully managed by ISP, they told me that the new /29 block will be configured to route to the original WAN IP of my RV320. I configured a 1to1 NAT and no luck I am unable to remotely connect to the device via the external IP.  Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.

    Jennifer,
    Thanks for the quick reply.
    You were pretty much correct, all I needed to do was create the appropriate NAT map between the Public IP & a DMZ server and also add a new RULE to allow the new public facing services to be available for internet users. This is just the same as setting up NAT'ing on the IP range configured on the Public ASA interface.
    I didn't need to set-up any static arp's or create any routes (default route is already set out via the Public interface). Also no ISP speific set-up was required, so as
    I haven't tried to set-up outbound NAT/PAT yet from the Private interface so I cannot say if that is just as easy.

Maybe you are looking for