Rv320 - port forwarding from a specific WAN IP

Hi, i just received and configuring the rv320 router. I can successfully set the port forwarding from WAN to specific LAN IP address. I would like to know is it possible for this device to set the port forwarding from a specific WAN IP address? Thank you for the help.

I have the same problem, and have already tried creating a Access Rule without success. I need to forward Remote Desktop Port 3389 from a specific public IP address to a internal server. I do this with other lower-level Cisco Small Business routers all the time, but cannot get this to work with the RV320. Here's what I've tried:
1) Create new Access Rule
2) Create new Service called TS for TCP port 3389-3389
3) Set new Access Rule to Allow
4) Set Source Interface to Any (I've also tried WAN1, etc.)
5) Set Source IP to the only single public IP that will be allowed
6) Set Destination IP to the single internal IP address
7) Set Scheduling to Always
When I use any standard RDP app from the outside, the router blocks 3389 access.
What am I missing? Can anyone help resolve this, or do I need to call in to Cisco Support?

Similar Messages

How to do port forwarding from wla2-g54l Buffalo bridge to mac mini

Hi,
I am trying to get Azurus to remove the "firewall block" message and I think I have narrowed it down to port forwarding.
I have set up port forwarding from my X modem to the Airport Xpress base station. I have then set up the port forwarding from the base station to the buffalo.
The problem I have had is setting up the wla2-g54l to forward the same port to the mac mini....
any Ideas? Not much luck on the Buffalo website.. and I have RTFM. Many times!
Cheers
Mac Mini G4 1.2Gz Mac OS X (10.4.8)

It sounds like your set-up is in a horrible mess with 3 levels of NAT going on.
What you should really have is the X-Modem configured in it's default mode "Modem Mode" where there will be no need to do any port forwarding as the modem is acting as a pure modem without having any influence over ports.
Then the Airport express should be configured to "Distribute IP addresses" so that the Airport is acting as a router. I presume that you use the Buffalo unit as a repeater for the AIrport so you should set-up WDS so that both are on the same network. Then your computers will all be using IP addresses in the 10.0.1.x range as issued by the Airport. You can then configure the Airport to directly forward ports to the IP address of your computer. Therefore only one instance of NAT and only one set of port forwarding rules.

LRT224: Port Forwarding for a specific remote IP address

Hi all,
I want to create a port forwarding rule for a specific service (tcp port). But I want to ensure that only users from a specific internet IP address are able to establish a connection to this port, e.g. the remote address should be limited to 27.27.27.27.
The port forwarding configuration page does not offer a field for entering a single remote ip or ip range. Is there a way to achieve this?
Thank you for your help.
Matthias

Derfry, what you need is to configure two access rules under Firewall>Access Rules tab. One rule is to Deny all IP from accessing the service you are forwarding, and the other rule is to Allow the specific IP address.

RV180W loses port forwarding rules when switching WAN connections

We have a backup WAN connection in our office, but we switch this connection manually on our RV180W when the primary goes down. Our normal connection is ADSL with PPPoE, and the backup is Cable with DHCP.
However, we also have some port forwarding rules for our VoIP PBX (UDP port 5060) as well as SSH, and these rules seem to stop working completely when we switch our WAN connection to our cable connection. We can still surf the web from our workstations, but our incoming phone calls and SSH connections all cease to work completely. The problem does not persist after we've switched back to our normal ADSL connection.
This behaviour is completely bizarre and suggests that there's some kind of bug in the Cisco RV180W.

helm,
I'm sorry, I wasn't clear which IP address renewal I am speaking about.
I believe that the problem is caused when the router renews the WHS's local IP address (192.168...). My WAN IP address remains unchanged througout the tests I performed and the problems I experienced.
The very act of changing the local clients' lease time in the router's configuration causes the forwarding to be lost immediately. (I am gusessing that when the lease time is changed, the router immediately renews the lease and begins a new countdown.)
(In fact, I might go as far as to say it is a bug in the firmware, but I haven't done enough testing to nail it down.)

RV320 Port Forwarding BROKEN

Greetings,
I recently purchased an RV320 to use in my network, but even on the latest firmware (1.1.0.09) am having an issue that ALL (internal and external) traffic is being forwarded when I enable port forwarding to my web server. I have managed to work around the problem using PAT, but I run Windows Server 2012 Essentials, and every time it rebooots for updates it checks and configures Port Forwarding. WSE also reports my router is mis-configured if I change it back - an annoyance I can live with for now if there is a fix on the horizon. This is a MAJOR headache and I would like to ask if there is an ETA for a fix so I can put this issue to bed and not worry that my netowrk will lose connectivity to the outside world randomly.
Please advise,
Bob Hessenauer
Additionally, my ISP has blocked all Port 25 traffic, so I have an email forwarder sending on port 8001. If I were to set up port triggering on outside port 8001 to internal port 25, would the forwarding rule for SMTP then kick in and forward the traffic the rest of the way to my email server?
Just wondering if that configuration would work instead of PAT.
Thanks,
Bob

All,
After an online chat with Cisco I finally called the support number. Enrique (a very patient and compotent engineer) re-flashed the device with the latest firmware and we set about to setting the configuration step-by-step. As of this writing I am pleased to announce that the problem is resolved and traffic is flowing beautifully WITH the Port forwarding rules in place. For those whose ISP is currently blocking port 25, there are services (dnsExit) that will forward your external email to your server on an alternate port, which can be translated to port 25 through Port Address Translation and then forwarded to the appropriate server.
My thanks to Enrique for his help and patience in finally getting this issue resolved.
Bob Hessenauer

Port Forwarding from TimeCapsule to QNAP NAS

Hi there,
I just read the posing under
https://discussions.apple.com/message/12003510?messageID=12003510
but it does not solve my problem. I have opened all the ports on my time capsule that are required fro my QNAP NAS, but everytime I enter the WAN IP of my internet router (ATT DSL modem) I only get to the modem admin page. I have entered the IP address of my NAS as the PRIVATE IP ADDRESS in the time capsule settings and also have followed all other steps. not sure what I am doing wrong. would be great if someone could point e in the right direction.
thanks

Hi Arvind,
We can do redirection oURL from HTTP to HTTPS by adding some parameter in instance profile.
But, in earlier reply you said you are going to block port 80, in such case you can't do redirection from HTTP to HTTPS from port 80 to 443
for e.g
user is giving URL :- http://www.test.com and you want to redirect it to https as :- https://www.test.com
Above example can only work when port 80 is open.
if you are using http port as 8080 in this case redirection can work as below
user is giving URL as :- http://www.test.com:8080 , it will get redirect to http://www.test.com
so redirection of HTTP without port in URL will redirect to https in scenario where port 80 is open.
any query pls reply.
Thanks
Anil

RV320; dedicate LAN PC to specific WAN

Is there a way to assign a specific PC on the LAN to use WAN1? We have two WANs and one has a much faster upload than the other and I want a certain user to always connect to the internet that way.
Thanks

Hello joemajestee,
Here is something you can try by going under System > Dual WAN, select the WAN you want to edit and in the new window that populates you will see a field called Protocol Binding.
In this field click on 'add' and select all services, the Source start and end IP will be the IP of the PC you want and the destination will be 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 and the WAN will be the WAN you want the PC to use.
I haven't tested this but it may do what you want.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Michael D.

SRP547W, How to use multiple WAN IPs for port forwarding?

Hi folks,
We've run into some difficulty trying to take advantage of multiple WAN IPs in conjunction with the SRP547, and I'm hoping someone here can help out or at least tell us that we're going to need to buy a different router...
What we're trying to acheive is the ability to port forward from our distinct public IPs to different internal servers. Looking at the options under Port Forwarding it looks like we can only configure forwards at the "WAN interface" level, but our problem is that we can't work out how to set up separate interfaces for each of our Public IPs...
Our ISP provides us with a fully managed NTU/router with a single "Internet" ethernet port, which we can use by statically configuring IPs on our end. For this configuration this port has been directly patched to the WAN ethernet port on the SRP547W.
We have been allocated a 255.255.255.248 (/29) subnet, giving us 5 usable IPs after the ISP's gateway address is taken into account, like so:
a.b.c.208     Network Address (/29 subnet)
a.b.c.209     ISP Gateway
a.b.c.210     IP1
a.b.c.211     IP2
a.b.c.212     IP3
a.b.c.213     IP4
a.b.c.214     IP5
a.b.c.215     Broadcast Address
On the SRP we've set up the default "Ethernet WAN2" sub-interface with the following details for IP1
VLAN ID:               4088 (Uneditable)
Connection Type:       Static IP
Internet IP Address:   a.b.c.210
Subnet Mask:           255.255.255.248
Default Gateway:       a.b.c.209
The next step (I would have thought) would be to add a second sub-interface, using similar info for IP2
VLAN ID:               4000 (Chosen arbitrarily)
Connection Type:       Static IP
Internet IP Address:   a.b.c.211
Subnet Mask:           255.255.255.248
Default Gateway:       a.b.c.209
When we try to do so however we get:
Fail!
Conflict with Ether_WAN2 interface address type
I should mention at this point that we're running on firmware version 1.02.01 (023).
Any suggestions on how we can proceed?
Is there a CLI or other method of configuration that might work if the web interface won't?
Thanks,
Tim.

OK, I've seen reference to this solution before but not much in the way of details. Perhaps you can spell out how this ought to work, as the Software DMZ doesn't behave as I'd expected it to.
As before, on the SRP we've set up the default "Ethernet WAN2" sub-interface with the details for IP1 with a /29 subnet.
VLAN ID:               4088 (Uneditable)
Connection Type:       Static IP
Internet IP Address:   a.b.c.210
Subnet Mask:           255.255.255.248
Default Gateway:       a.b.c.209
We'd now like to expose a server function on IP2, let's say LAN details for this server are:
VLAN:                  3000
VLAN IP Range:         192.168.1.1/24
Server IP:             192.168.1.10
Server Port:           80
So first we turn on Software DMZ:
Status:                Enabled
Public IP:             a.b.c.211
Private IP:            192.168.1.10
WAN Interface:         Ether_WAN2
My understanding, based on what you've said, is that this should expose the whole server to external access via IP2. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to work this way - we don't seem to have any access at all. Perhaps there's a default deny rule on the firewall?
Just to be sure, I tried creating a rule to allow HTTP traffic to the server in the Advanced Firewall page.
In Interface (WAN):    All
Out Interface (LAN):   VLAN.3000
Source IP:             0.0.0.0
Source Subnet:         0.0.0.0
Destination IP:        192.168.1.10
Destination Subnet:    255.255.255.255
Protocol:              TCP
Source Port:           Any
Destination Port:      Single:80
Action:                Permit
Schedule:              Everyday
Times:                 24 Hours
Still no dice. What am I missing?
Cheers,
Tim.

WAG320N port forwarding to wireless client/bridge client

Hi,
My network looks like the above diagram:
1. Wireless bridge connections.
ADSL Line ==> WAG320N (192.168.1.1) == bridge client mode ==> TP-Link WR941ND (192.168.1.4) ==> Client (192.168.1.11)
2. Lan connections.
ADSL Line ==> WAG320N (192.168.1.1) == cable connection ==> Client (192.168.1.100)
3. Wireless AP conenctions.
ADSL Line ==> WAG320N (192.168.1.1) == wireless connection ==> Client (192.168.1.106)
Port forwarding from WAN to LAN (scenario 2) clients works great, but I have problem with wireless clients (scenario 1 and 3). Accessing the wireless destination from LAN is possible. Also pings from WAG320N to the wireless destination looks OK.
PING 192.168.1.11 (192.168.1.11) 60 bytes of data.
60 bytes from 192.168.1.11: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=1.69 ms
60 bytes from 192.168.1.11: icmp_seq=2 ttl=63 time=1.62 ms
60 bytes from 192.168.1.11: icmp_seq=3 ttl=63 time=2.23 ms
60 bytes from 192.168.1.11: icmp_seq=4 ttl=63 time=1.60 ms
60 bytes from 192.168.1.11: icmp_seq=5 ttl=63 time=2.12 ms
60 bytes from 192.168.1.11: icmp_seq=6 ttl=63 time=3.78 ms
60 bytes from 192.168.1.11: icmp_seq=7 ttl=63 time=1.61 ms
60 bytes from 192.168.1.11: icmp_seq=8 ttl=63 time=1.56 ms
60 bytes from 192.168.1.11: icmp_seq=9 ttl=63 time=2.08 ms
60 bytes from 192.168.1.11: icmp_seq=10 ttl=63 time=3.37 ms
--- 192.168.1.11 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9002ms
rount-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 1.569/2.172/3.788/0.748
Forwarding external port 9090 to wireless client (192.168.1.11:80) is not working. I am thinking of resetting to default settings. What do you think?

nicebilal_007 wrote:
Hope ! You are fine.I am using LINKSYS WAG320N since 10 days.I am facing no. of issues.If wifi is on & i connect "LAN PORT OF MY PC" to LINKSYS WAG320N or with ADSL Modem.My LAN doesn't work.
When i am using wifi,it frequently disconnects or doesn't work.
There is no fault from my ISP Provider.
Anyone can address my issues...Thanks a lot....
From:Bilal Ali-Pakistan
[email protected]
0092-344-7127679
Reset the WAG320N then check if you are getting a valid ip address to know if it is still assigning an ip address to the network. To reset, press and hold the reset button for 30 seconds while the power on. After that, release the button and power off the WAG. Leave it off for 30 seconds then power it back on. Wait for the power light to stop blinking then check if you have a valid ip address with the computer. You may click the link below on how to check the ip address of the computer:
Title: Checking your computer’s IP address
Article ID: 3996
http://kb.linksys.com/Linksys/ukp.aspx?vw=1&docid=d02ed3aa3e704caea42f5c007b8c6472_3996.xml&pid=80&r...

Actiontec Rev. F port forwarding - is filtering by IP possible?

I would like to know if Actiontect Rev. F router allows filtering by IP address for port forwarding (similar to Windows 7 firewall, Advanced Settings, "Scope" tab). That is I want only requests from specific external IP address to be allowed through.

Points to your other thread at
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r26265890-Windows-7-firewall-and-port-forwarding-from-FIOS-router
If you are the original poster (OP) and your issue is solved, please remember to click the "Solution?" button so that others can more easily find it. If anyone has been helpful to you, please show your appreciation by clicking the "Kudos" button.

Port Forwarding, MI424WR

I'm not even sure I'll give enough information here, because I don't really know what I'm talking about. However, I've been working with a couple of "technical" people from my office.
Essentially, I'm trying to connect two devices (Yamaha Disklavier Pianos) over my FIOS connection (for a process called Remote Lesson) and need to utilize port forwarding. I've tried the instructions on the www.actiontec.com website (Basic Port Forwarding on the MI424WR Verion Fios Router), but have been unable to connect successfully.
Basically, here's the two things I need to do (cut and pasted from a technical document draft). Can someone please advise what might be going wrong?   I could also forward the entire "connection" document to someone who might want to take a look at it and get a clearer picture.
At any rate, here are steps 2 and 3 of the process we're trying to do:
2. Port Forwarding for Remote Lesson (WAN to LAN)
- Port 58092 is used in both TCP and UDP by default.
        - Note: You can choose any port unless it has already used.
- Please configure a system to forward the access of this port to Disklavier.
3. Release of the port to the Internet (LAN to WAN)
- If the access of port 58092 is filtered, please release this port in both TCP and UDP.
         Note: If your partner has configured another port number, please release that port in both TCP and UDP.
Port setting table
PORT FORWARDING (WAN TO LAN): IP Address (original LAN Address)
Port Number (origin)
Protocol: Both TCP and UDP
RELEASE OF THE PORT (LAN TO WAN): Port Number: Destination or all
   Protocol: Both TCP and UDP
Thanks for being patient with a "newbie" - I hope someone can help.

levesq56 wrote:
Essentially, I'm trying to connect two devices (Yamaha Disklavier Pianos) over my FIOS connection (for a process called Remote Lesson) and need to utilize port forwarding. I've tried the instructions on the www.actiontec.com website (Basic Port Forwarding on the MI424WR Verion Fios Router), but have been unable to connect successfully.
Thanks for being patient with a "newbie" - I hope someone can help.
If you're only trying to connect the 2 devices within your local lan you do not need to do anything with port forwarding. You would only need to add port forwarding rules if you are going to access the devices from remote sites.
The below addresses step 2 of your question.
Step 3 of your question is not needed as the actiontec does not block any port access from the LAN to the WAN
Step 2 allowing wan to lan access
If you are doing the latter then you would want to give the device fixed ip addresses, make sure they are out of the dhcp range of the actiontec router.
Then go to firewall setting
Select Port Forwarding tab
Select New Entry
add the IP address of the device in the Local Host field
Make sure Forward to Port is set as Same as incoming Port
Make sure Schedule is set as Always
Under protocols Select User defined
Make the service name whatever you want - e.g Piano
Select new server ports
Under protocols Select TCP
Under source port select single
enter 58092
Make sure destination port saya Any
Hit OK
Select New server ports again and repeat the last five steps for protocol UDP
then say OK
Say OK to the Edit port Forwarding rule
Now you should be able to access the device from the outside WAN

Port forwarding in Solaris 8

Hi,
I am new to Solaris and am trying to set up a simple port forwarding from port 80 to 8080.
I know how to do this in Linux:
iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -p tcp dport 80 -j REDIRECT to-port 8080
but cannot find a way to do this in Solaris. I have installed SunScreen, but am not sure whether this is the right thing to use.
This is a simple server in a hosting centre.
Can anyone help?

In solaris you can do port forwarding with ssh . You have to install SSH from soalris 2 of 2 CD .
see man pages of ssh
Regards

Help: Port forward in Cisco SOHO 97

Hi there!
I have a Cisco SOHO 97.
The IP is: 10.0.0.1/24
Gw: 0.0.0.0
*Default route via DIALER1
I also have a RV042 configured as VPN Server (PPTP and IPSec).
The IP is: 10.0.0.2/24
I need help to configure the router to I be able to connect to VPN server from OUTSIDE-WORLD.
I imagine I need Port forwarding from Cisco SOHO to RV042.
I hope for possibles answers!
Thanks!

Sorry i found the issue.
The problem was that, i wanted to redirect port 443 (https) to an private address.
But by default port 443 is reserved to access ASA via https for management.
I just reserved another port 888 for https management access and now i can redirect port 443 normaly as i wanted.
Using this command: http server enable 888
Germain

RV220W port forwarding an 99% CPU usage

Hi,
I made a custom port forward using tcp ports 2121-2130 to a private IP address on my network (192.168.1.8). Whenever I do this, RV220W CPU usage spikes to 98-99% and my Internet connection starts lagging a lot. Just disabling the port forward from the administation console fixes this. I'm running the latest firmware.

Taneli,
There is a problem with port forwarding in RV220W please read the release notes for 1.0.3.5 for work arounds
Jasbryan

How to Port Forward on Cisco 1900 Router?

We have a cisco 1900 router. I m new to cisco routers commands, recently started learning. I need to forward all requests coming from port 1723 from outside to inside server ip. I check "show running-config" and I see already forwarded ports and ip like below,
ip nat pool onlyone xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx netmask 255.255.255.252
ip nat inside source list 1 pool onlyone overload
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.0.xx 22 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 22 extendable
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.0.xx 80 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 80 extendable
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.0.xx 80 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 96 extendable
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.0.xx 443 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 443 extendable
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
where xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is public facing IP.
so what is the command to add "ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.xx 1723 <public-ip> 1723 extendable" to currnetly working settings?
I am currently reading below but no luck so far...
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/access/1900/software/configuration/guide/software_configuration.pdf
I have found this
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094e77.shtml#topic7
interface ethernet 0
ip address 172.16.10.1 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
!--- Defines Ethernet 0 with an IP address and as a NAT inside interface.
interface serial 0
ip address 200.200.200.5 255.255.255.252
ip nat outside
!--- Defines serial 0 with an IP address and as a NAT outside interface.
ip nat inside source static tcp 172.16.10.8 8080 172.16.10.8 80
!--- Static NAT command that states any packet received in the inside
!--- interface with a source IP address of 172.16.10.8:8080 is
!--- translated to 172.16.10.8:80.
How do I know if "interface ethernet 0" and "interface serial 0" will work for me?

the router is already setup and working for 2 years. all i need to do add a simple port forward from public ip to internal server. Following make sense to accomplish what i m trying to do. Lets assume 1.2.3.4 is my office public static ip and 192.168.0.10 is my internal server. All requests will come from some Ip lets say 25.24.23.22:1723 to 1.2.3.4:1723 and router will forward this request to 192.168.0.10:1723. This is all i m trying to accomplish. I m not setting up a new router. Some rules are already there. Therefore below seem to be what i need. All I need is how to identify "interface ethernet 0" & "interface serial 0". I understand the inside and outside details. All i have to find is how to replace ethernet 0 and serial 0 with what i have in my router setup.
interface ethernet 0
ip address 172.16.10.1 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
!--- Defines Ethernet 0 with an IP address and as a NAT inside interface.
interface serial 0
ip address 200.200.200.5 255.255.255.252
ip nat outside
!--- Defines serial 0 with an IP address and as a NAT outside interface.
ip nat inside source static tcp 172.16.10.8 8080 172.16.10.8 80
!--- Static NAT command that states any packet received in the inside
!--- interface with a source IP address of 172.16.10.8:8080 is
!--- translated to 172.16.10.8:80.

Rv320 - port forwarding from a specific WAN IP

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for