RV320 - using one WAN port

What is the correct configuration for using one WAN port so that the router doesn't crash several times a day?
Should WAN2 be left as address from IP ?
Shoudl WAN2 be configured as static IP ?
Should WAN2 interface be disabled?
Should WAN2 be configured as DMZ and left as default 192.168.1.0?
Should WAN2 be configured as DMZ and then disabled?
It's definitely the router which is at fault, power cycling the fibre to copper converter dosen't fix the issue.
Nor does swapping the FTC for a brand new one.
Only a power cycle on the RV320, or a remote web interface reset if I'm unside the LAN, makes it work.
Temporarily, then it crashes next day.

I have the same settings, and the same up-to-date firmware.
I see in the logs that the router incorrectly reports WAN2 as Up, then can't sync rate with it.
Most of the time that failure is around the same time as the users report failure.
But nothing is logged for WAN1 so it doesn't seem to be a physical failure in cabling, or the FTC converter feeding the router.
2015-04-27, 10:33:35
Kernel
kernel: WAN [2] UP
2015-04-27, 10:33:35
Kernel
kernel: [eth0] lanip=192.168.1.1, mask=255.255.255.0
2015-04-27, 10:33:35
Kernel
kernel: ip[xxx.xxx.xx.xxx] mask[0.0.0.0]
2015-04-27, 10:33:35
Kernel
kernel: ip[0.0.0.0] mask[0.0.0.0]
2015-04-27, 10:33:36
Kernel
kernel: WAN [2] DOWN
2015-04-27, 10:42:10
Kernel
kernel: WARNING: cant get external phy status
2015-04-27, 10:42:11
Kernel
kernel: WARNING: no highest common denominator or auto-negotiation not complete
2015-04-27, 10:42:11
Kernel
kernel: WARNING: no highest common denominator or auto-negotiation not complete
2015-04-27, 10:58:01
Kernel
kernel: WARNING: no highest common denominator or auto-negotiation not complete
2015-04-27, 10:58:02
Kernel
last message repeated 2 times
2015-04-27, 10:58:02
Kernel
kernel: nk_bcm53115_sync_speeds_phy_to_mac(): sport[5], speed[0], duplex[0]
2015-04-27, 10:58:03
Kernel
kernel: nk_bcm53115_sync_speeds_phy_to_mac(): sport[5], speed[1], duplex[2]

Similar Messages

  • Using the WAN port as a "LAN" port on the Airport Extreme Base Station...

    Hi everyone,
    I'm re-building my home wireless network and I'm doing so in preparation for the Slingbox AV I ordered last week. Here's my current setup:
    I have a DSL modem attached to an Airport Express (802.11n) in my office broadcasting my internet signal. I have an Airport Extreme Base Station (802.11g) set up in my living room as a WDS extender. I currently use the base station in my living room to connect the DishNetwork ViP722 DVR to the internet and allow me to set recordings remotely on my iPhone when I'm away from home. I use the LAN port on the base station to do this, and now with the Slingbox on the way (should be here early next week), I'm wondering what I need to do to make an internet connection available for the Slingbox AV.
    My question: Will I be able to simply use the WAN port as a "LAN" port since the Airport Extreme Base Station is being used as a WDS? It'd be awesome if the WAN port would become, essentially, a LAN port since it isn't being used.
    Thanks in advance for your advice and insight!

    slugoo wrote:
    My question: Will I be able to simply use the WAN port as a "LAN" port since the Airport Extreme Base Station is being used as a WDS? It'd be awesome if the WAN port would become, essentially, a LAN port since it isn't being used.
    I'd be surprised if that worked. The operation of an AirPort base station depends on keeping the WAN port and the LAN port(s) separate, as those normally are on two different networks.
    You might consider buying an Ethernet hub or switch, which would allow your AirPort Extreme's LAN port to be shared. Here's an example of an inexpensive one:
    http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=7169244&st=ethernet+switch&type=pr oduct&id=1110266457435

  • RV042 - direct browsing traffic to only one WAN port?

    Hi, I have a RV042 (firmware 1.3.13.02-tm). Is it possible to configure so traffic from a specific domain (incl. its sub-domains) is directed exclusively to one WAN port? If so, how can I do this? Thanks.

    Hi PAC, in a load balance environment it affects only outbound traffic which would use protocol bind to force traffic through a particular WAN port, meaning it won't affect inbound traffic.
    The access rules page only supports source interface but you may try to create an access rule that looks something like this;
    Action Allow
    Service - (Whatever service you're using)
    Source interface WAN 1
    Source IP address - Range of public IP address from the domain/sub domains
    Destination Ip address - The IP address of your subnet or specific nodes
    Now, if you're using a load balance environment, you may want to bind traffic to WAN 1 that originate from the specific hosts that make the request to the domain/sub domains to ensure the source IP address leaving the router otherwise it would be possible to have a different source IP going over the 2nd WAN.
    I'm not sure if it would work this way but to the best of my knowledge this would about be the only way to make it work since the router doesn't support telling inbound services to use a specific WAN.
    -Tom
    Please mark answered for helpful posts

  • Use one IPS port to create tunnel to two remote MDS switches?

    is it possible to use one gigabit port on MDS IPS 14+2 linecard to create FCIP tunnels between two other remote MDS switches?
    each tunnel will  allow a different VSAN. this is kindda crude but gotta do it, if it can be done

    yes it can be done, make 1 FCIP profile defining the Ip address of the GE interface.  Then create 2 different FCIP interfaces ( tunnels )  each one will use the same profile, but have different peers.

  • RV320 - vlan on Wan Port

    Here in Brazil VIVO (from the spanish Telefonica group) is recently providing fiber links.
    Their fiber link is being splitted into 2 vlans: one for their IPTV (vlan id 20) and another for internet (vlan id 10).
    So, when they install on your house or company, they install 2 boxes: 1 ONT (Optical Network Terminal) and 1 router (which connects to the ONT and does the PPPoE auth on VLAN 10 and creates the internal VLAN for the IPTV - id20). 
    So, is it possible to replace their router with the RV320 and create tagged / untagged VLAns on Wan Ports and assigning ip address on each vlan (PPPoE for internet, DHCP for iptv)?
    The topology is basically like this:
    [Fiber Cable]
    ONT
    [Ethernet Gigabit]
    Router
    [Ethernet / Coaxial]
    Network Devices
    TVs (coaxial connection provided by 2. Router)
    PCs (wireless /ethernet connection provided by 2.Router)

    Hello, 
    Thank you for sharing the information about the DD-WRT firmware on other devices.Unfortunately the RV320 is not capable of such a feature, it is just not designed to do that.
    On the other hand we do have one unit that is capable of such configuration, it is the RV315W router. 
    Here is a link to the emulator for the unit so that you have an idea of its capabilities.
    http://www.cisco.com/assets/sol/sb/RV315W_Emulators/RV315W_Emulator_v1.01.03/index.asp.htm
    The feature you are looking for can be configured by going to Port settings, WAN, Wan interface settings, then you can configure the desired VLANs. 
    I'm not sure that this device is available in Brazil. If it is not available then you may have to consider using enterprise units or other devices.
    Please let us know if this is helpful.

  • Using specific wan port for a particular domain/IP

    I have RV042 router which is connected to the internet by both the wan ports and I want to use it as a load balancer so that both of my internet connections can be utilized evenly. But now I have an issue in this scenario as my remote application gets logout whenever the communicating IP address changes.
    Now here is my question.
    Is there any way out so that I can specify the wan port used for a particular public IP address/domain name?

    Hi Kinshuk, thank you for using our forum, my name is Luis I am part of the Small business Support community. I read your post and I have an article from our knowledge base and called Guide me, you could use to configure a protocol binding in order to specify the WAN port that you want redirect and select the specific traffic.
    http://www6.nohold.net/CiscoSB/Loginr.aspx?login=1&pid=2&app=search&vw=1&articleid=622
    If you scroll down you will see a section called "Manage Protocol Binding" here you will see instructions to configure that.
    If you have any question please let me know.
    I hope you find this answer useful
    Greetings,
    Luis Arias.
    Cisco Network Support Engineer.

  • RV320 - Using Specific WAN Setting

    Hi All,
    I am new to RV320 and I would like to know that how can I set an IP address using specific WAN (say Wan 1) connection when load balance is enable.
    Thanks,
    Eric

    Hi Eric,
    You should be able to achieve it by using protocol binding settings:
    Dual WAN--> click on WAN (1 or 2) icon --> scroll down to protocol binding --> add specific rule for all services where source IP address would be your particular LAN host IP (repeated twice if it is only 1 host) and destination 0.0.0.0 (repeated twice) choose desire WAN1 or WAN2.
    I hope this helps,
    Aleksandra

  • Using the WAN port as a LAN port?

    Hi everyone,
    sorry for not doing a search, but search isn't available at the moment.
    I have an AirPort Extreme Base Station (n) and need to extend my network with an AirPort Express (g) so that the APX connects wirelessly to the AEBS and allows wired clients on its Ethernet port. I've read that this port can be set to WAN mode (default), but also can be used as a LAN port to provide access for AirPort-less clients.
    I'm wondering now
    1) if this is correct and possible at all?
    2) if this will work with my older (g) APX or only with the current (n) model?
    Thanks a lot!
    Björn
    PS: Here's some cheap +ASCII art+ showing what I want to accomplish.
    Internet <–––> AEBS ))))) ((((( APX <–––> *Mac without AirPort*

    Yes that will work. Configure the 802.11g AirPort Express (AX) and AirPort Extreme base station (AEBS) to connect wirelessly using WDS. Then the AX's Ethernet port will be enabled for use by your Mac without a wireless card.

  • Can I use the WAN port on my AirPortExpress to extend my WiFi from my Time Capsule?

    OK folks, here's what I want to do.  I have a Time Capsule not only supplying WiFi, but also connected to the ethernet in my home.  What I want to do is use the ethernet to connect my AirPort Express and extend the WiFi signal.  I've tried various settings configurations and the closest I get is a duplicate network.  This causes problems for Home Sharing of iTunes accounts to my 2 Apple TV's, one that is connected to ethernet and the other WiFi.  Plus, it seems to confuse our iPhones and another WiFi computer from time to time.
    So can this even be done, is there another option I'm missing? We are trying to use this in a room for the AirPlay feature and the original WiFi signal drops pretty regularly, so moving it closer to the TC is a last resort.
    Thanks in advance for the help!

    Hi - if what you want to do is have the Express produce a wireless network with a new name then you need to configure it in the following way - it should be set to connect via ethernet in bridge mode and set to "create a wireless network" with a new name and password of your choice - if you need specific steps let me know.

  • Can i use one thunderbolt port as a video input?

    so i just bought a Late 2013 21,5" iMac, and i know that thunderbolt techonlogy accept output and input, so, can i use it to connect another device and use mi imac as a reciever? if not, WHY? APPLE, PLEASE put this feature on an update now!

    Welcome to Apple Support Communities
    You can. It is called Target Display mode, but on a Thunderbolt iMac like your Mac, it only works with other Thunderbolt Macs (Late 2009 and Mid 2010 27-inch iMacs could be used as an external display for some PCs and even for a Xbox 360 or PlayStation 3). See > http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3924?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US
    You are not talking to Apple here. Instead, you can send feedback to them > http://www.apple.com/feedback

  • Can't configure both WAN ports on 1811 with SDM

    Hi,
    We recently procured an 1811 router to replace a SOHO linksys at a store we service. We needed redundant WAN interfaces to use the DSL as a backup to the main cable connection, and a Linksys RV082, while doing the job when it actually worked, died repeatedly. We decided after looking at the 1811's feature set to just get the Cisco and be done with it and not monkey with SOHO gear anymore.
    Where I'm having difficulty is SDM won't let me configure both WAN interfaces from the GUI, it only allows me to configure one. I have it configured, and the router is working nicely in the test lab but I need to get that other interface configured and failover enabled before I can put this thing into production.
    What am I doing wrong? Do I need to suck it up and learn IOS?
    Thanks,
    Todd Phipps
    Certco, Inc.

    I ended up figuring out the IOS commands to enable one fastethernet port as a primary and the other one as a backup (running both cable and DSL for redundancy; it's a grocery store that runs electronic transactions over IP so 100% availability is a must).
    The trouble I was running into in SDM is that while it would allow me to configure one WAN port through the GUI, the config options for the second one were grayed out. Now that both are configured through IOS the edit buttons for both WAN interfaces appear normally in SDM. It's almost as if Cisco didn't want users to be able to configure both interfaces graphically for initial setup.
    Now just to test it at the site before the store opens to see if the failover works...
    Todd

  • SA520W Optional WAN port problem

    Hello,
    I have a problem to configure the optional wan on my SA520W.
    We have 2 connexions (Cable and ADSL), when I set the primary wan with the Cable there are no problems. When I set the primary wan with the ADSL there are no problems. But when I set the Cable on the primary wan, and the ADSL on the optional wan, primary wan works, but optional wan doesn't. Leds are green, link state is UP, but wan state is DOWN.
    Connection Time
    : Not Yet Available
    Connection Type
    : PPPOE
    Connection State
    : Not Yet Connected
    Link State
    : LINK UP
    WAN State
    : DOWN
    IP Address
    : 0.0.0.0
    Subnet Mask
    : 0.0.0.0
    Gateway
    : 0.0.0.0
    DNS Server
    : 0.0.0.0
    Secondary DNS
    : 0.0.0.0
    MAC Address
    The SA520 runs firmware 2.2.07.
    Can anyone point me to a solution ?
    Thanks,
    Graham.

    Graham,
    To use both WAN ports at the same time, browse to Networking-> Optional Port-> WAN Mode. Select Load Balancing so that all traffic will be balanced between the two WAN ports. The other modes only allow a single WAN port to be connected at one time.
    - Marty

  • SA520 optional wan port problems

    Hi,
    I've got some problems activating my optional wan port...
    The error is :
    [SA520]pppoeMgmtTblHandler: pppoe enable failed
    [SA520]pppoeMgmtDBUpdateHandler: error in executing database update handler
    Thanks for your help,

    Hello weillia,
    Thanks for your response,
    but....
    I don't understand your question ? i tried protocol bindings to force DNS protocol using first wan port...
    Problem is the same...
    And I'm using public Google dns for my domain.
    But I've got another big problem !!!
    I bought a small DLink DSL320B to replace my old Thomson 510 (wich is not ADSL2+ compatible)....
    It doesn't works with SA520... I've got kernel errors :
    Fri Sep 30 14:45:00 2011(GMT +0200)
    ERROR
    Kernel
    ip_conntrack_in: Frag of proto 17 (hook=0)
    Component: KERNEL
    Fri Sep 30 15:24:01 2011(GMT +0200)
    ERROR
    Kernel
    *******The above log repeated 41 times *******
    Component: KERNEL
    Fri Sep 30 15:24:01 2011(GMT +0200)
    ERROR
    Kernel
    ip_conntrack_in: Frag of proto 47 (hook=0)
    Component: KERNEL
    Configuration is good (bridge mode) and It works well directly on a PC...
    Thanks for all.

  • Buying External Drive that Only Needs One USB Port?

    The optical drive on my 2007 MacBook Pro has been dead for about 6 months. I need to get an external one so I can install some software, but I am having trouble finding one that only uses one USB port, as there is only one on each side of my notebook. I went to Best Buy today, and the only one they had that is compatible with a Mac needs two side-by-side USB ports.
    Does anyone know of any good Mac compatible external drives that only require one USB port? I am interested in purchasing one by LaCie, but their site does not specify how many USBs it requires.
    Any advice you can give me will be greatly appreciated!

    Welcome to Apple Discussions!
    You might want to consider a FireWire powered optical drive:
    http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/firewire/optical-drives/
    A FireWire port will deliver more power, so you would only need to use one FW port. The people at OWC are very Mac knowledgeable and could help you to pick one out. Your 2007 MBP should have both FW400 and FW800, so you could use either port.
    Good luck!

  • RV320, specific traffic through specific wan port

    Hello all,
    I love the RV320, one of the best routers i've bought in years and it works like a charm with our Fiber connection on WAN1 and Coax Cable on WAN2.
    The only question I have right now, i know it is possible to sent specific traffic (DNS,HTTP etc) through specific WAN ports.
    But would it also be possible in some way to say *.website.com traffic will go through WAN port x only?
    Specific apps we use are only available through an IP coming from the provider we use on WAN2 (cable coax), so it would be handy if we could say that if app this or that and/or website is being called, auto serve it through WAN port x.
    Is this possible and if not, something cisco could  add?      

    Dear Michiel,
    Thank you for reaching Small Business Support Community.
    Besides the service management options available I do not see a particular feature to accomplish your needs. I work on this community forum as an analyst and I am going to mark this post as a business opportunity for improvement of the device.
    Thank you for your comment and please do not hesitate to reach me back if there is anything I may assist you with in the meantime.
    Kind regards,
    Jeffrey Rodriguez S. .:|:.:|:.
    Cisco Customer Support Engineer
    *Please rate the Post so other will know when an answer has been found.

Maybe you are looking for