RVKRED77  Issue

Dear all,
when we run RVKRED77  report, we meet bellowed issue:
1) we set RVKRED77  as backjob, when someone modify sale order or delivery note or billing , the RVKRED77 will stopped and can't run again, although we set the backjob at night, so how to don't stop RVKRED77 and let RVKRED77 go on.
2) We have over 1000 customer, so it take many time to run the RVKRED77 .
thanks!

Additionally; to ensure consistent credit data, you have to run RVKRED77,        
respectively RVKRED07 with NOBLOCK = ' '. This shall avoid, that   
any user change any SD document during the re-build run and        
causes by this inconsistent credit values again.                                                                               
Normally this risk is minor, but you have to decide by yourself,   
if you want to bear this risk or not.                                                                               
I think if you have totally incorrect credit values to one         
credit account, it is better to run RVKRED07 with NOBLOCK = 'X'    
and to accept the risk of minor inconsistent values than to        
work always with totally incorrect credit values. Additionally you 
can check the correctness of the credit values after re-build      
by comparing the results of RVKRED88 and the values to see in      
FD32 transaction.                                                                               
So maybe you could do the following in your situation:             
- Determine credit accounts with incorrect credit values           
  (e.g. you can use Z_CREDIT_VALUE_COMPARE from note 666587).      
- Run RVKRED07 with NOBLOCK = 'X' for such credit accounts with    
  big inconsistencies.                                             
  Run the report for single credit accounts and not for a range    
  of credit accounts! This will lower the runtime and minimize     
  the risk of again inconsistent credit values.                    
- Afterwards you can check for the processed credit account        
  again for incorrect credit values.                                                                               
Please ensure that you use only KNKLI, KKBER and NOBLOCK as        
selection parameters (and PROTB if you want result list) !!        
By using other selection parameters you will really get            
incorrect credit values!!     
I hope this help.
Gerard

Similar Messages

  • Static credit check: credit limit exceeded for consignment issue delivery

    Hi,
    We are encountering a credit limit exceeded error in delivery creation for a consignment issue.
    In SPRO config "Credit limit check for order types", no credit limit check is assigned to the order type. However, there is one assigned for the delivery type. Also, for CCAr/Risk cat./CG combination in OVA8 (Auto Credit Block Delivery), static credit check has been activated with error message reaction. Open orders and open deliveries were also activated. Customer exceeded credit exposure but user cannot release the order in any VKMx transactions as no credit limit check is assigned to the order type.
    Given that this is the current setup, and the following conditions:
    1. Credit limit for the customer cannot be increased
    2. Oldest open item cannot be cleared just yet
    Is there any way that we can proceed with delivery creation for this customer? The other order types have credit limit check so credit management team was able to release them. However, we are unsure on how to proceed with this consignment order. Kindly advise and thank you in advance for your help.

    We are encountering a credit limit exceeded error in delivery creation for a consignment issue.
    but user cannot release the order in any VKMx transactions as no credit limit check is assigned to the order type.
    Looks contradictory and it may need to run report RVKRED77 to reorganization of open credit values. Try to run the report in test system and then run in production system. After running the report, the use must be able to release in VKM* transaction.
    Regards,

  • Credit check issue in third party order

    Dear all,
    We are facing some issues related to credit management data for one of our customer. I need your valuable inputs for below mentioned queries-
    1. As a genaral question- When we releases a SO through VKM* How the system calculated the " Released Credit Value of the document".
    2- For one of the customers, the FD33 shows a Sales value X USD. As i see the split of this sales value , this X USD amounts to OPEN DELIVERIES. Both Open So and Open billing are zero. We tried to check with no. of tcodes to find out the open values but no such Open delv document is appeared.
    In VC/2, it only shows Open SO, no open deliveries are there.
    So i tried with simulation program RVKRED88, and found 5 third party Sales documents , against which some value is coming under the Open delivery value and it sums up to the value as coming in FD33.
    I have a few questions on this-
    > All the SO in output are Third party SO, against which PO has been created, ( Third party So> PR> PO> MIRO--> billing) and all are in status OPEN, so how come they are showing value in OPEN DELIVERY ?
    --> The value appearing against these third party SO is Not equal to items value/net value, it is a complete different value than appearing in SO. But in SO changes history , the same value is coming AS RELEASED CREDIT VALUE. How is it being calculated?
    For eg- for one of the Third party SO , the value coming in RVKRED88 is 29573.53 USD,
                                                                net value in So= 24,120.00 USD, Qty = 6000 PC , Credit price= 4.02 USD
                                                                Credit value of So in VBAk= 29573.53 USD
                                                               SO created , released on 08.July.2011, confirmed schedule line =08.Oct.2011
    Credit settings- Static check + Credit active Item cat and SO ,  Open So and open delv are ticked in credit settings.
    Kindly help in the analysis.
    many thanks in advance for the inputs.

    Hi Dharmendra,
    1.  When we release a sales order using VKM* transaction S066 information structure and OEIKW field is updated which increases open order value.
    2. If there is mismatch in the values of credit related fields run RVKRED77 (Re-organisation of credit in case of update errors) this will update all the credit data for a Payer customer in real time. RVKRED88 is simulation mode.
    3. Updating of values related to credit is controlled by the update group assigned to credit control area. If system is not able to update  using the assigned update group it will automatically try updating using the next update group. Below is the text of SAP Help.
    If a document cannot be processed with the update group you specify, the system determines the next possible update it can carry out. For example, you select Update group 000012 which, at delivery, reduces the open order value and increases the open delivery value. Assume that one item in the order is not relevant for delivery. In this case, the system automatically determines Update group 000018 for this item. Update group 000018 increases the open delivery value for the order item. The system uses the confirmed quantity of delivery-relevant schedule lines to update the order value
    As you know in OVA8 transaction credit control area, Risk category, credit group and currency are assigned to update group.

  • Open Sales Order values not getting updated after run RVKRED77 & RVKRED88

    Hiiii,
    In Production Server. We run the reports RVKRED77 & RVKRED88. Credit info structure and and Open Sales Order values not getting updated. In FD32, Status - Sales value it showing '0". At the time of creating Sales Order Dynamic Credit check not happening coz of Tables S066 not updating. Please provide me Solution.
    Best Regards,
    Sridhar . P

    Dear Heagal,
    I followed your suggestions and implemented in the Development and moved the changes in to Quality Server. I tested it thoroughly by creating New Customer and maintained Credit Limit. I come to know that Problem is in all Servers. I made 3 changes.
    1. In Pricing Procedure Sub Total A it was not maintained against Net value. I placed it.
    2. Removed Credit groups for Delivery Type.
    3. In OVA8 i maintained Max. Doc Value :99,999,999.00 before it was with 1.00
    I checked the OMO1 Settings it was Asynchronous. As SAP Notes Suggesting to use Synchronous but here it's a client setting. So, It's Can't possible to change. Changes will affect other Company Codes.
    Tested both in DVP and QTY Dynamic Credit Check is working Perfectly and Status in FD33 Sales Value field getting update.
    If i move these changes in to Production, Will i need to run the reports again or not? How it will affect on Old Cusomer Billing and  Credit Limit data. For few of the Customers the Credit Limit data it was exceeded. Please provide me advice. The issue need to be Solved immediately.
    Best Regards,
    Sridhar

  • Credit Limit issue during PGI despite Credit available to customer

    Dear All,
    We have configured for Credit Management for Customer.
    Everything was working perfectly fine for a very long time. But now there suddenly seems to be an issue. The customer has available credit but still the system does not allow us to do PGI. It gives an error message that the customer credit limit has been exceeded.
    We checked in FBL5n and found that credit is available. There are no backlogs. But in FD32 we found that the credit exposure shows values in positive and the Blocked check box is ticked therefore blocking the customer. When we checked through Menu path - Environment - Sales & Distribution Docs - Open Orders and Open Deliveries , here we found that in table S067 there are open orders and open deliveries. But upon cross checking with VA05n and VL06/Vl04, we found no open deliveries or open sales orders.
    This seems to us as a strange issue that the system is not updating the LIS table although we have not configured for LIS.
    We contacted SAP for this and were given a temporary solution to execute program RVDREK77 to clear the table. But this dosent seem to be a permanent solution since we have to run this everyday as a background job. Also this program can be run only when no other transaction happens in SAP.
    If anyone has faced a similar problem, I would request to suggest us a permanent solution for this.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Rohan Gudavalli.

    Hi Rohan,
    As per my understanding of the issue, There is problem in credit updation. To manage this you have to run  the program RVKRED77. On executing this program system will reorganize the credit in case of update errors. Please have this execution done once in a week during week ends for required credit control areas. This is quite common problem we encounter regarding the updation of credit and the only way is to run the mentioned program periodically.
    As you know normally in credit S066 and S067 information structures are involved in the updation. These information structures work in tandem with the update group which is assigned in OVA8 screen resulting in the updation of credit.
    When an order is created S066 information structure gets effected and OEIKW field value gets increased.
    When order is delivered S066-OEIKW gets decreased and S067-OLIKW gets increased.
    When delivery is billed S067-OLIKW gets decreased and S067-OFAKW gets increased.
    So credit is completely controlled by the information structures and the update group. Some times it happens that system will not be able to update the credit. To re-organize the credit incase of update errors please have a background job set up done prferably during week endsfor the program RVKRED77.
    As you are saying that you have problem with only one customer; please check whether oldest open items check is evaluated.
    Please use the program Check_CM to analyze the credit. On inputing the order number or the delivery number you can get the complete analysis of the credit done for the order or delivery.
    Hope this explains.
    Edited by: mokirala tilak on Jan 6, 2012 6:21 PM

  • Credit Management - Negative Sales Value issue

    Hi we have discovered an issue with our Credit Management which for a number of long term customers is showing negative values within Credit Management. The figures in Receivables is always correct, but the Sales Values are showing negatives, which then impacts on the Credit exposure. We have tried to replicate the issue with a new customer, rasiing an order, then an invoice, an invoice cancellation, and even a credit memo and this works fine. However for longer term customers we have a vast number where the sales value is negative.
    We seem unable to create a report which shows the sales value broken down into sales order number so we could identify an issue. Any ideas?

    Hi,
    check SAPNET note 396338 as analysis help for this documents. For the affected customers, run RVKRED77 to create the credit management values new.
    Best regards, Christian

  • Credit Update issue

    Hi Gurus,
    We have some performance issues for running RVKRED77 and we implemented Sap note-666587, as per that we created new program- Z_CREDIT_VALUE_COMPARE  which we will identify the customers who having the wrong credit values and we will run RVKRED77 for those customers  other than running for the whole customers.
    Now the issue is Z_CREDIT_VALUE_COMPARE is extracting the customers and iam running RVKRED77 for updating correct values and this process is successfully happening but if again i run  Z_CREDIT_VALUE_COMPARE the same customer turning in with the updated values.
    Can anyone suggest me on this..
    Thanks in Advance.

    Hi Jyothi,
    This program for updation needs to be run in isolation. If you are having order,billing, delivery or accounting documents including cash collection being posted into SAP for the customer you are running the correction report, the values will be always incorrect updation.
    thanks
    Kapil Sharma

  • New DVR Issues (First Run, Channel Switching, etc.)

    I've spent the last 30 minutes trying to find answers through the search with no luck, so sorry if I missed something.
    I recently switched to FIOS from RCN cable in New York.  I've gone through trying to setup my DVR and am running into issues and was hoping for some answers.
    1.  I setup two programs to record at 8PM, I was watching another channel at the time and only half paying attention.  Around 8:02 I noticed a message had popped up asking if I would like to switch channels to start recording.  I was expecting it to force it to switch like my old DVR, but in this case it didn't switch and I missed the first two minutes of one of the shows.  I typically leave my DVR on all day and just turn off the TV, this dual show handling will cause issues with that if I forget to turn off the DVR.  Is there a setting I can change that will force the DVR to choose one of the recording channels?
    2.  I setup all my recordings for "First Run" because I only want to see the new episodes.  One show I setup was The Daily Show on comedy central, which is shown weeknights at 11pm and repeated 3-4 times throughout the day.  My scheduled recordings is showing all these as planned recordings even though only the 11pm show is really "new".  Most of the shows I've setup are once a week so they aren't a problem, but this seems like it will quickly fill my DVR.  Any fixes?
    Thanks for the help.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    I came from RCN about a year ago.  Fios is different in several ways, not all of them desirable.  Here are several ways to get--and fix--unwanted recordings from a series recording setup.
    Some general principles. 
    Saving changes.  When you originally create a series with options, or if you go back to edit the options for an existing series, You MUST save the Series Options changes.  Pretty much everywhere else in the user interface, when you change an option, the change takes effect immediately--but not in Series Options.  Look at the Series Options window.  Look at the far right side.  There is a vertical "Save" bar, which you must navigate to and click OK on to actually save your changes.  Exiting the Series Options window without having first saved your changes loses all your attempted changes--immediately.
    Default Series Options.  This is accessed  from [Menu]--DVR--Settings--Default Series Options.  This will bring up the series options that will automatically be applied to the creation of a NEW series. The options for every previously created series will not be affected by a subsequent modification of the Default Series Options.  You should set these options to the way you would like them to be for the majority of series recordings that you are likely to create.  Be sure to SAVE your changes.  This is what you will get when you select "Create Series Recording" from the Guide.  When creating a new series recording where you think that you may want options different from the default, select "Create Series with Options" instead.  Series Options can always be changed for any individual series set up later--but not for all series at once.
    Non-series recordings.  With Fios you have no directly available options for these.  With RCN and most other DVRs, you can change the start and end times for individual episodes, including individual episodes that are also in a series.  With Fios, your workarounds are to create a series with options for a single program, then delete the series later;  change the series options if the program is already in a series, then undo the changes you made to the series options later; or schedule recordings of the preceding and/or following shows as needed.
    And now, to the unwanted repeats. 
    First, make sure your series options for the specific series in question--and not just the series default options--include "First Run Only".  If not, fix that and SAVE.  Then check you results by viewing the current options using the Series Manager app under the DVR menu.
    Second, and most annoying, the Guide can have repeat programs on your channel tagged as "New".  It happens.  Set the series option "Air Time" to "Selected Time".  To make this work correctly, you must have set up the original series recording after selecting the program in the Guide at the exact time of a first run showing (11pm, in your case), and not on a repeat entry in the Guide.  Then, even it The Daily Show is tagged as New for repeat showings, these will be ignored. 
    Third, another channel may air reruns of the program in your series recording, and the first showing of a rerun episode on the other channel may be tagged as "New".  These can be ignored in your series if you set the series option "Channel" to "Selected Channel".  Related to this, if there is both an SD and HD channel broadcasting you series program, you will record them both if the series option "Duplicates" is set to "Yes".  However, when the Channel option is set to "Selected Channel", the Duplicates Option is always effectively "No", regardless of what shows up on the options screen.  
    As for you missing two minutes,  I have sereral instances in which two programs start recording at the same time.  To the best of my recollection, whenever the warning message has appeared, ignoring it has not caused a loss of recording time.  You might have an older software version.  Newest is v.1.8.  Look at Menu--Settings--System Info.  Or, I might not have noticed the loss of minutes.  I regularly see up to a minute of previous programming at the start of a recording, or a few missing seconds at the beginning or end of a recording.  There are a lot of possibilities for that, but the DVR clock being incorrect is not one of them.  With RCN, the DVR clocks occasionally drifted off by as much as a minute and a half.

  • Pension issue Mid Month Leaving

    Dear All,
    As per rule sustem should deduct mid month joining/leaving/absences or transfer scenarios, the Pension/PF Basis will be correspondingly prorated. But our system is not doing this. In RT table i have found 3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00.
    Employee leaving date is 14.04.2010. system is picking pension amout as 541. Last year it was coming right.
    Please suggest.
    Ashwani

    Dear Jayanti,
    We required prorata basis pension in case of left employees and system is not doing this. This is the issue. As per our PF experts Pension amount should come on prorata basis for left employees in case they left mid of month.System is doing prorata basis last year but from this year it is deducting 541. I am giving two RT cases of different years.
    RT table for year 2010. DOL 26.04.2010
    /111 EPF Basis              01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /139 VPF Basis              01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /3F1 Ee PF contribution     01/2010                    0.00           1,050.00 
    /3F3 Er PF contribution     01/2010                    0.00             509.00 
    /3F5 Ee Mon PF contribution 01/2010                    0.00           1,050.00 
    /3F6 Ee Ann PF contribution 01/2010                    0.00          12,600.00 
    /3F9 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,00 01/2010                    0.00              96.25 
    /3FA PF basis for Ee contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00 
    /3F4 Er Pension contributio 01/2010                    0.00             541.00
    /3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
    /3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
    /3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
    /3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
    /3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
    /3R3 Metro HRA Basis Amount 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
    1BAS Basic Salary           01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
    RT table for year 2009. DOL 27.10.2009
                                                                                    /111 EPF Basis              07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13
    /139 VPF Basis              07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13
    /3F1 Ee PF contribution     07/2009                    0.00           1,082.00
    /3F3 Er PF contribution     07/2009                    0.00             628.00
    /3F5 Ee Mon PF contribution 07/2009                    0.00           1,082.00
    /3F6 Ee Ann PF contribution 07/2009                    0.00           8,822.00
    /3F9 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,00 07/2009                    0.00              99.18
    /3FA PF basis for Ee contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
    /3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
    /3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
    /3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00
    /3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00 
    /3FC Pension Basis for Er c 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00 
    /3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00 
    /3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00 
    /3R4 Non-metro HRA Basis Am 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13 
    1BAS Basic Salary           07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13 
    Now please suggest what to do. where is the problem  ? If have also checked EXIT_HINCALC0_002 but nothing written in it.
    With Regards
    Ashwani

  • Open PO Analysis - BW report issue

    Hello Friends
    I constructed a query in BW in order to show Open Purchase Orders. We have custom DSO populated with standard
    datasource 2lis_02_itm (Purcahse Order Item). In this DSO we mapped the field ELIKZ to the infoobject 0COMP_DEL
    (Delivery completed).
    We loaded the data from ECC system for all POs and found the following issue for Stock Transport Purchase orders (DocType = UB).
    We have a PO with 4 line items. For line items 10 and 20, Goods issued, Goods received and both the flags "Delivery
    complete" and "Final delivery" checked. For line items 30 and 40, only delivery indicator note is issued for zero
    quantity and Delivery complete flag is checked (Final delivery flag is not checked) in ECC system. For this PO, the
    delivery completion indicator is not properly updated in the DSO for line items 30 and 40. The data looks like the
    following:
    DOC_NUM     DOC_ITEM       DOCTYPE     COMP_DEL
    650000001       10     UB        X
    650000001       20     UB        X
    650000001       30     UB
    650000001       40     UB      
    When we run the Open PO analysis report on BW side this PO is appearing in the report but the same is closed in ECC
    system.
    Any help is appreciated in this regard.
    Thanks and Regards
    sampath

    Hi Priya and Reddy
       Thanks for your response.
                         Yes the indicator is checked in EKPO table for items 30 and 40 and delta is running regularly for more than 1 year and no issues with other POs. This is happening only for few POs of type Stock Transport (UB).
                        I already checked the changes in ME23N and the Delivery completed indicator was changed and it reflected in EKPO table. Further, i checked the PSA records for this PO and i am getting the records with the Delivery completed flag but when i update from PSA to DSO the delivery completed indicator is not updating properly.
                       In PSA, for item 30 i have the following entries. Record number 42 is capturing the value X for ELIKZ but after that i am getting two more records 43 and 44 with process key 10 and without X for ELIKZ. I think this is causing the problem.
    Record No.    Doc.No.                    Item              Processkey         Rocancel     Elikz
        41               6500000001            30                    11                            X           ---    
        42               6500000001            30                    11                            ---           X
        43               6500000001            30                    10                            X           ---
        44               6500000001            30                    10                            ---         ---
    (Here --- means blank)        
    Thanks and Regards
    sampath

  • HP LaserJet Enterprise 600 M602 driver issue

    Hello,
    I've got issue with 600-series printers. We use the latest UPD drivrer ver. 61.175.1.18849 and print from XenApp 6.5. The error occurs every time when users try to print jpg files from XenApp session. It only happens with 600 series printers and UPD.
    Also I've tried to assign native 600-series driver ver. 6.3.9600.16384 and it works good. But with that driver system says that it's color printer and it brokes our printing reports. These reports are very important for us. So we can't use printer and that driver as well.
    Printer installed on Windows Server 2012 R2. All clients are Windows 7 x64. XenApp Servers are Server 2008R2.
    Is it possible to get fixed UPD driver or correct native driver for Server 2012 R2?
    Regards,
    Anatoly

    I am sorry, but to get your issue more exposure I would suggest posting it in the commercial forums since this is a commercial printer. You can do this at Printers - LaserJet.
    Click on New Post.
    I hope this helps.
    Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
    Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!
    Gemini02
    I work on behalf of HP

  • Windows 7 displays error message when exiting +cursor issue

    Two issues here. CS5 Phoshop on Wind 7 64 bit.
    Physical processor count: 8
    Processor speed: 3073 MHz
    Built-in memory: 12279 MB
    Free memory: 9577 MB
    Memory available to Photoshop: 10934 MB
    Memory used by Photoshop: 80 %
    Image tile size: 128K
    First issue is since the latest automatic Adobe update (why fix what isn't broken?) Every time I now exit Photoshop I get the message "Adobe QT Server has stoped working" and occasionally it happens when I exit bridge. Indesign is also behaving badly. I can no longer start a previous document from file manager without ID crashing out.
    The other is the cursors in Clone and erase lose their edge (become invisable) for no reason - well not quite. Noise Ninja crashed Photoshop when I tried to use it. I reinstalled it and all is well. The cursor issue seems to be intermittant but came back (for no reason) after I reinstalled NN. I can't seem to change the cursor, no matter what I do. The problem is now seriously affecting how I work. Almost enough to go back to Win XP which ran CS5 Photoshop flawlessly.
    Any help will be gratefully accepted.
    Doug

    function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
    doug87510 wrote:
    The recent problem is the entire outline of the cursor (including the crosshair in the middle) was missing at any size of cursor. All I had was exactly what I'd get if I used a real spraygun.
    Well, that issue is simply a matter of hitting the Caps Lock key.  When Caps Lock is on, you'll see the cursor outline, and when it is off you'll see a crosshair.  That's a feature, not a bug.
    Glad to hear the 11.1 drivers are out.  I will download them and try them now myself.
    Regarding "Adobe QT" crashing...  QT brings to mind QuickTime, though that is Apple, not Adobe.  Do you have Apple QuickTime installed?
    Regarding memory usage, with 12 GB of installed RAM, you should be able to set Photoshop to use 90% or more in Edit - Preferences - Performance.
    -Noel

  • Issue in Creation of Periodicals for Contracts in CRM7.0

    Hello,
    I have a requirement to create Contracts in CRM7.0 system.
    And I am doing this using the BAPI *BAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTI*
    Good part is Contract Order gets created, but onlywith Header Details.
    The issues i am facing --
    1. I need to know what kind/type of data must be passed to the interface parameters, the F1 Help/Documentation is vague.
    2. I am passing data in the INPUT FIELDS structure with the Object ID, Handle Number, Reference GUID and Fieldname,
        here what does 'Logical Key' field indicate? What should be passed here.
        What does 'REFERENCE KIND' field indicate, i have been passng 'A' for everything (to be frank i dont know whats its significance is!!).
    3. With so much, My Order gets created but with less than half details, i.e. the Objects not getting created are -  Partner, Product, terms/appointments, Status, LongTexts......
    Any help/inputs would be appreciated.
    Hope my problem is stated clearly ...
    --Regards
    Dedeepya

    Hi Anu,
    i found my solution by debugging with existing data or while creating it in CRMD_ORDER.
    Ensure that you are passing a correct entry in INPUT_FIELDS structure.
    As i haven't worked on rebates i woudlnt be able to help you, I suggest you debug to arrive at a solution.
    You can preset your break-points at :-
    1. FM - CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN
    2. CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN_MULTI_OW -- Debug through the complete FM.
    3. CRM_ORDER_PREPARE_MULTI_OW -- The data is set in this function module.
    Regards
    Dedeepya C

  • Issue in creation of plant related data at receiving server using BD10

    Hi all,
    This is regarding Material master creation using B10.I am using MATMAS05 message type for sending data from one system to another.Data is sent and received successfully.When i go in mm03 i can see all the views created successfully accept views related to PLANT.Please guide to resolve the issue.
    When i entered into Log-
    1)"The field MBEW-BKLAS is defined as a required field; it does not contain an entry".
    2)"No material master data exists for material AB_08.04.09(30) in plant 4001".
    My segemnt is as follows-
    ZMATMAS05                      matmas05
           E1MARAM                        Master material general data (MARA)
               Z1KLART                        KLART----
    My extention
               E1MARA1                        Additional Fields for E1MARAM
               E1MAKTM                        Master material short texts (MAKT)
               E1MARCM                        Master material C segment (MARC)
                   Z1AUSPM                        E1AUSPMDistribution of Classification:----
    My extention
                   E1MARC1                        Additional Fields for E1MARCM
                   E1MARDM                        Master material warehouse/batch segment (MARD)
                   E1MFHMM                        Master material production resource/tool (MFHM)
                   E1MPGDM                        Master material product group
                   E1MPOPM                        Master material forecast parameter
                   E1MPRWM                        Master material forecast value
                   E1MVEGM                        Master material total consumption
                   E1MVEUM                        Master material unplanned consumption
                   E1MKALM                        Master material production version
               E1MARMM                        Master material units of measure (MARM)
               E1MBEWM                        Master material material valuation (MBEW)
               E1MLGNM                        Master material material data per warehouse number (MLGN)
               E1MVKEM                        Master material sales data (MVKE)
               E1MLANM                        Master material tax classification (MLAN)
               E1MTXHM                        Master material long text header
               E1CUCFG                        CU: Configuration data
           E1UPSLINK                      Reference from Object to Superior UPS
    Thanks.
    Edited by: sanu debu on Apr 27, 2009 7:10 PM

    CREATE CONTROLFILE SET DATABASE "NEWDB" NORESETLOGS ARCHIVELOGAlso when you are setting a new database, the option should be RESETLOGS and not NORESETLOGS.
    'D:\APP\ADMINISTRATOR\ORADATA\NEWDB\ONLINELOG\O1_MF_2_7FK0XKB8_.LOG
    D:\APP\ADMINISTRATOR\ORADATA\NEWDB\DATAFILE\O1_MF_SYSTEM_7FK0SKN0_.DBFWhy underscore(_) at the end of the datafile name. Any specific reason ?

  • Issue in Creation of new Value Field in CO-PA

    Hi,
    I have a query in CO-PA Value Field Linking.
    In my Development Client,
    1. Created a New Value Field (No Transport Request Generated)
    2. Linked to the above to new Conditon type created in SD. (Tranport request was generated) i.e. in Flow of Actual Values->Transfer of Billing Documents->Assign Value Fields
    However then i try creating a new Value Field in my Production Client it throws a message 'You have no authorization to change Fields".
    Is this an issue with authorization or i need to transport the Value field too from Development to Production client.
    Please Advise.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Safi

    Thanks Phaneendra for the response.
    The creation of Value field did not create any tranportation request. Will this too be transported if i transport the Operating Concern.
    Please Advise.
    Thanks,
    Safi

Maybe you are looking for