RVO16 Protocol Binding Unexpected Behavior

Good Afternoon. I have an RV016 device I have been running with a single WAN utilizing the Forwarding service to redirect any external requests appropriately. I now need to direct those requests to multiple systems. I have enabled multi-wan and am now utilizing two WANs with separate static IP addresses. I set up protocol binding for each WAN the same as how I had the Forwarding service configured, they are simply now WAN/Public IP specific, at least that is what I am hoping for. I removed the forwarding requests that existed previously as that section does not allow to specify which WAN port the requests come in on.
When I am attempting to access my system utilizing protocol binding I am getting the RV016 authentication and not being forwarded to the appropriate internal/private system and service port. Am I missing something? Thank you.

I changed to the tr:inputText with no better results. The side effect also is that this does not render correctly in an af:panelLayout control.
<tr:inputText id="agencyId" label="Agency Id:" value="#{AgencyMaintenance.agency.id}" disabled="true"/>
The HTML markup follows: (This is for the af:inputText)
<tr id="agencyId" class="x1e p_AFDisabled">
<td class="xu x4j">
<label for="agencyId::content">Agency Id:</label>
</td>
<td class="xk7" valign="top" nowrap="">
<input id="agencyId::content" class="x1p" type="text" disabled="" name="agencyId"/>
</td>
</tr>
Message was edited by:
Scott Bishopp IBI

Similar Messages

  • RV016 Protocol Binding & Access Rules do not work on PPTP

    Hi
    I am Enabled PPTP Server and connection success, but can’t block the internet service by Protocol Binding and Access Rules for PPTP client.
    The PPTP Server:
    192.168.1.150~160
    Protocol Binding:
    HTTP [TCP/80~80] -> 192.168.1.150~160(0.0.0.0~0.0.0.0)
    Access Rules:
    1; Enable; Deny; HTTP [80]; LAN; 192.168.1.150~160; Any; Always
    Firmware Version: 3.0.0.19-tm
    I tried to test the setting by local PC connect the router directly. The rule is running.
    But by PPTP, it can go to internet. And confirmed the VPN IP is 192.168.1.150

    st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }
    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:表格內文;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-parent:"";
    mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0cm;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:"Times New Roman";
    mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
    mso-ansi-language:#0400;
    mso-fareast-language:#0400;
    mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
    HI  Mr Krastew.
    Thank you for your reply.
    But i am not looking stop internet web service on my client side only.
    May be I explain more here.
    The client PC is running on intranet, that mean client network stopped all service [1~65535: TCP/UDP] pass through WAN. At this moment, the client network allows the PPTP Port 1723 pass through it only. And the Client PC is running on manual configure No DNS.
    And the client requests that client PC NO intranet service when PPTP VPN connected. So I can't Disable Using Remote Network Default Gateway on TCP/IP Configure.
    And Server (RV016), half of pc allow connect to internet.
    The Local PC in server LAN can control by ACL.
    The client connected by PPTP and the IP still within the ACL. But it can access internet all service. (e.g. FTP, HTTP).
    So I want to know it is my configure problem? Or the router own problem? Or my design problem?
    Now, I key in wrong DNS on client PC to Cheat the user for temporary.
    Best regards,
    Joe Wong

  • Unexpected Behavior error while creating a connection in IDT

    Hi Everyone,
    I have created a connection on top of a database using ODBC.
    I could able to see the connection in IDT.
    I have mentioned the user name and pw correctly  and tried testing the connection and got the error "unexpected behavior"
    PFA error.
    what could be the reason? any idea?
    Thanks.

    I find this 32-bit vs. 64-bit ODBC somewhat confusing.  I know you aren't dealing with Crystal Reports, but this blog post does provide some clarity.  It has a link to this Microsoft knowledge base article from which I quote...
    A 64-bit version of the Microsoft Windows operating system includes the following versions of the
    Microsoft Open Database Connectivity (ODBC) Data Source Administrator tool (Odbcad32.exe):
    The 32-bit version of the Odbcad32.exe file is located in the %systemdrive%\Windows\SysWoW64 folder.
    The 64-bit version of the Odbcad32.exe file is located in the %systemdrive%\Windows\System32 folder.
    One other warning.  In my experience I have found that you cannot run both the 32-bit and 64-bit ODBC admin tools at the same time.  If you have one running and try and start the other one it will just bring up the one you already had running.
    To make sure I know which instance I am in at any give time I have created a dummy data source that corresponds to the instance; 32-bit or 64-bit.
    Let us know how it goes.
    Noel

  • Add Both as an option on protocol binding.

    Please consider adding "Both" as an option on protocol binding to allow load balancing specific ports/destinations.
    It's needed to do things like Bind all IP trafic to ip XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX except traffic on port 80 where you'd put the port 80 > Both rule above the all traffic to XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX to wan2 rule. (I assume the rules are first match otherwise whats the move up/down for?)

    Hi dragon2611,
    I have read an article before with regard on the reason why having an option "BOTH"" may not be possible. According to that article, this is to avoid a condition where all WANs are assigned to specific Intranet IP or Service Ports and destination IP, resulting in no more WAN ports available for other IP addresses and Service Ports.

  • Unexpected behavior on 5.1.19 Select query

    Hello There,
    We are seeing an unexpected behavior on 11.2.5.1.19 where we are expecting our query should response “X” number of records while it response us back with less number of records in some situation. While looking to the change log we did notice that a fix has been added to 11.2.5.1.25 as follows:
    “Fixed a bug that would return DB_NOTFOUND while searching for an existing item using a cursor on a non-sorted duplicate btree database. [#19210]”
    We were wondering whether that fix could resolve this issue or not? If yes, is there a way we can get a Patch to apply and validate so that we can move to 11.2.5.1.25 or newer versions.
    Here is what we are doing, Within an application we have two threads, One is Inserting/Updating record in the table while the other one is selecting, and all DB operations are done in transaction. Select thread comes after certain time whenever a condition is satisfied. Although it work fine most of the time but there are situation where select response with fewer records that we expected, that causes our program to died as expected. However, if we query the Database (using dbsql) after the application died using the same select query/criteria we could able to select the exact same number of records that we were expecting to see. We are not sure what is going wrong here, any help is appreciated.
    Regards & Thanks

    Hi Rittick,
    I have made some modifications to the example program ex_sql_multi_thread.c,
    based on the information you sent in email. So far I can not reproduce the
    problem either. This does look like something we have seen before:
    Berkeley DB lost data sometimes when I ran the example ex_sql_multi_thread
    but it is difficult to pinpoint without an exact reproducer. One thought is
    if you can try the application with the latest Berkeley DB release which
    is: 5.3.15. Some race conditions were fixed in that release and since you can
    reproduce the behavior with 5.1 and 5.2 you should be able to verify if
    it is present or not in 5.3.15.
    Thanks,
    Sandra

  • Unexpected behavior of Foreach Loop in SSIS 2012

    I have come across the unexpected behavior of Foreach Loop in SSIS 2012. While testing package for invalid folder (path asdf:\Vishal_Work does not exists in this case) for source files. 
    I observed that the control does not enters into Foreach Loop, but also it does not fails the task. The task Foreach Loop runs successfully, though folder was invalid.
    The package did not throw any warning regarding invalid folder, but for the unmatched file pattern.
    My concern is ‘why Foreach Loop in SSIS did not failed even if folder was invalid or not exists?’

    The warning is "The For Each File enumerator is empty. The For Each File enumerator did not find any files that matched the file pattern, or the specified directory was empty."
    The warning message states the specified directory was empty, though it does not extists.
    We can handle this scenario through script task easily, but I really wonder why Foreach loop does not validate the folder. It is loophole in Foreach loop?
    I would not classify it as loophole. I actually agree with Russ, it was a design decision on the side of the development team.
    But you may freely file it as a bug or suggestion at MS Connect: https://connect.microsoft.com
    I would vote it up because I see how it can lead to undesired package behavior (logical flaw).
    Arthur My Blog

  • Protocol binding doesn't work for OVPN clients.

    As title, it seems protocol binding doesn't apply to users remote connecting via OVPN, meaning that even though I have a rule covering 172.0.0.1 - 172.0.0.254 for all traffic to wan2 the remote users outgoing traffic is still getting loadbalanced.
    This causes a problem for SSL sites as it's not hitting the rules to pin to wan2.

    I will have to verify this since the LRT OpenVPN Server shouldn't be using outgoing Load Balancing and get back to you.
    Please remember to Kudo those that help you.
    Linksys
    Communities Technical Support

  • If DW 2014.1 cc does not support database, binding, server behavior, and PHP/MySQL require it, but using Adobe Extensions Mngr IS NOT recommended, then WHAT TOOLS do we use to develop a database with DW?

    I'm using windows DW 2014.1 cc. I'm following lynda.com tutorials to build a website database with PHP and MySQL. I learned I have to download Adobe Extension Mngr to active DATABASE, BINDING, SERVER BEHAVIOR panels, which I've done. BUT NOW I'VE BEEN ADVISED NOT TO USE THESE TOOLS for new development. If this is the truly the case, then WHAT TOOLS DO I USE to develop a website that has a database?

    then WHAT TOOLS DO I USE to develop a website that has a database?
    Besides the tools you would already need for a system using server behaviors (web server, PHP, MySQL, phpMyAdmin) the only extra tool you need is your own brain.
    A lot of people are disappointed by the lack of database tools in DW now, but really it's much better this way. You can never achieve better than a rinky-dink dynamic website using server behaviors. The code Dreamweaver dynamic behaviors create is really terrible. (I'm not insulting the fine folks who wrote the feature. It's just a consequence of automated code.) You can write better, simpler, more maintainable code yourself, and over time you will improve. With server behaviors you cannot improve. you get stuck in database kindergarten.

  • RV042G difference between bandwidth - protocol binding for WAN ports

    Can somebody explain a little bit better then the manual what the differences are between bandwidth management on WAN ports and protocol bindings?
    If you can specify in each section which protocol should go where why having two places to configure this?
    Or are there some things to remind when using one of them?                  

    Even if I tell the router to use bandwidth priority for SMTP to WAN2 (and i do not have protocol binding active for smtp to wan2) it still goes to wan1, how does the router choose this kind of behaviour?

  • 'The process for the mtp protocol died unexpectedly'

    As you can read from the title, I have problem to mount Android device in KDE. I have installed kio-mtp, and maybe it is working out of the box for other android phones out there except for mine (HTC One X).
    The device mounted, but when I try to transfer files (copy, paste, cut), it throwing up an error which is 'The process for the mtp protocol died unexpectedly'.
    Can somebody tell me if I'm missing something? Did I have to install any other tools to get the job done?

    I'm having a similar (maybe the same) problem. I have an International Samsung Galaxy S3 (i9300). Same symptons on both stock ROM and Cyanogenmod 10.1
    Try debugging the kio-slave:
    Run
    kdebugdialog --fullmode
    and verify that kio (ID 7000) has all its outputs set to Shell. (should be the default)
    Then run
    kdeinit4
    in a terminal and leave that terminal open. The debug messages will be displayed in that terminal.
    Open dolphin and try to create a folder/copy a file/etc. on your phone and watch the debug output.
    Mine is:
    Device 0 (VID=04e8 and PID=685c) is a Samsung Galaxy models (MTP+ADB).
    libusb_detach_kernel_driver() failed, continuing anyway...: Permission denied
    ignoring libusb_claim_interface() = -6PTP_ERROR_IO: failed to open session, trying again after resetting USB interface
    LIBMTP libusb: Attempt to reset device
    [3635:3658:0227/171452:ERROR:object_proxy.cc(624)] Failed to get name owner. Got org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NameHasNoOwner: Could not get owner of name 'org.chromium.Mtpd': no such name
    [3635:3658:0227/171452:ERROR:object_proxy.cc(624)] Failed to get name owner. Got org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NameHasNoOwner: Could not get owner of name 'org.chromium.Mtpd': no such name
    [3635:3635:0227/171452:ERROR:object_proxy.cc(529)] Failed to call method: org.chromium.Mtpd.EnumerateStorages: object_path= /org/chromium/Mtpd: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name org.chromium.Mtpd was not provided by any .service files
    QDBusConnection: session D-Bus connection created before QCoreApplication. Application may misbehave.
    [3635:3635:0227/171455:ERROR:omnibox_view_gtk.cc(431)] Not implemented reached in virtual void OmniboxViewGtk::ApplyCaretVisibility()
    unnamed app(3742) KMimeTypePrivate::ensureXmlDataLoaded: Missing <comment> field in "application/x-msdownload.xml"
    unnamed app(3742) KMimeTypePrivate::ensureXmlDataLoaded: Missing <comment> field in "application/x-note.xml"
    unnamed app(3742) KMimeTypePrivate::ensureXmlDataLoaded: Missing <comment> field in "application/x-wine-extension-art.xml"
    unnamed app(3742) KMimeTypePrivate::ensureXmlDataLoaded: Missing <comment> field in "application/x-wine-extension-asa.xml"
    unnamed app(3742) KMimeTypePrivate::ensureXmlDataLoaded: Missing <comment> field in "application/x-wine-extension-ascx.xml"
    unnamed app(3742) KMimeTypePrivate::ensureXmlDataLoaded: Missing <comment> field in "application/x-wine-extension-aspx.xml"
    unnamed app(3742) KMimeTypePrivate::ensureXmlDataLoaded: Missing <comment> field in "application/x-wine-extension-bsp.xml"
    unnamed app(3742) KMimeTypePrivate::ensureXmlDataLoaded: Missing <comment> field in "application/x-wine-extension-cdx.xml"
    unnamed app(3742) KMimeTypePrivate::ensureXmlDataLoaded: Missing <comment> field in "application/x-wine-extension-dem.xml"
    unnamed app(3742) KMimeTypePrivate::ensureXmlDataLoaded: Missing <comment> field in "application/x-wine-extension-xif.xml"
    unnamed app(3742) KMimeTypePrivate::ensureXmlDataLoaded: Missing <comment> field in "text/x-component.xml"
    LIBMTP PANIC: failed to open session on second attempt
    kioslave: ####### CRASH ###### protocol = mtp pid = 3521 signal = 11
    Last edited by dieteric (2013-02-27 16:26:04)

  • RV042 - protocol binding not working as advertised

    Hello everyone.  I seem to have an issue that I cannot find a solution to and was hoping the support community would be able to help.  The platform I am trying this on is the RV042.  I have updated the firmware to 4.2.3.03.
    The scenario for this configuration involves two RV042 routers.
    The office router will only have one ISP.
    The remote router will have two ISP where WAN1 will have a high-speed Internet link and WAN2 will have a satellite high-latency Internet link.
    I can establish WAN1 on the remote router to create a VPN tunnel back to the office router.  This works great.  However, I was hoping to use "Protocol Binding" to direct a Service (TCP/5000) to only transmit over WAN2.  I was hoping to dedicate WAN2 (satellite connection) specifically for this Service and no other traffic can transmit over WAN2 (even if WAN1 was offline).  In the case that WAN2 is offline, this Service will fail on transmit as well.
    I am having issues getting this to work.  I have created a custom Service for TCP/5000.  I have created the "Protocol Binding" for this Service where I have used the computer performing the transmission (192.168.1.100 to 192.168.1.100) to destination (0.0.0.0 to 0.0.0.0) on WAN2.
    The problem I have now is if WAN1 goes down (or disconnected), all traffic goes over WAN2.  This includes HTTP, HTTPS, etc.  On a satellite connection, this can get very costly.  Also, if I disconnect WAN2 and leave WAN1 online, I noticed this TCP/5000 traffic is transmitted successfully as well.
    This leads me to believe that my Protocol Binding is not configured properly.  I have found a few discussions and Internet articles regarding protocol binding with similar issues, but no solution has been given.
    I hope someone out there can help!!

    Hello l0p3zz187,
    Unfortunately at the Small Business level of devices we do not have a device that will do as you need.  I would recommend contacting our Enterprise Presales team to see if they can suggest a device that will meet your needs.
    That number is 1-800-553-6387.
    Regards,
    Michael D.
    If this post is helpful please rate or mark as correct.

  • RV042 protocol binding for SIP and RTP (VoIP)

    Hello everybody,
    I have a RV042 with a DSL (WAN1) and cable (WAN2) internet connection in Load Balance Mode. The DSL provider also provides internet telephony when registered via his line. When I disable the WAN2 port, my IP phone successully registers with the registration server of the DSL provider. I also defined protocol bindings for SIP (port 5060) and RTP (ports 5004 to 5020) to be bound to WAN1. My IP phone is set up to listen on only these ports.
    The rules are in detail:
    SIP(UDP/5060~5060) -> "myPhoneIP"~"myPhoneIP" ("RegistrationServerP"~"RegistrationServerIP") WAN1 [Enabled]
    SIP(UDP/5060~5060) -> "RegistrationServerIP"~"RegistrationServerIP" ("myPhoneIP"~"myPhoneIP") WAN1 [Enabled]
    RTP(UDP/5004~5020) -> "myPhoneIP"~"myPhoneIP" ("RegistrationServerP"~"RegistrationServerIP") WAN1 [Enabled]
    RTP(UDP/5004~5020) -> "RegistrationServerIP"~"RegistrationServerIP" ("myPhoneIP"~"myPhoneIP") WAN1 [Enabled]
    With these protocol bindings in place when I re-enable WAN2, then after some time the phone reports "registration failed".
    Do I need to set something else apart from protocol binding to force the VoIP traffic to go via WAN1?
    Thanks for your help
    Felix

    Pardon my memory if I am mistaken, when configuring the protocol bind for the WAN port, there are 4 or 5 options. Service, which of course is 1~65535, source IP, in this scenario it should be the phone or PBX, whatever you're using. The destination IP should be 0.0.0.0 and interface is your desired WAN, WAN 1 or 2.
    Example:
    Wan 1- Cable       Wan 2 - Dsl
           |                              | 
           | ________________ |
                          |
                      RV042-----------
                  ____|                |
                  |                     Computer  192.168.10.100
              Tele/PBX 192.168.10.250
    On this example to route the Telephone / PBX to WAN 1
    All services 1~65535
    Source IP 192.168.10.250
    Destination IP 0.0.0.0
    Interface WAN 1
    Please correct me if I am mistaken, I'm currently not at work due to the US holiday

  • Will Protocol Binding with an Internal Email server work?

    The aim is to use Modem 2 in sending out emails. Modem 1 and Modem 2 are connected to WAN 1 and 2 respectively of the RV042 (set to load balancing). Protocol Binding was set for the mail server to use port 25 through WAN 2. When tested, traceroute and telnet indicates that it goes to WAN1. Access Rule was added, but still has the same results.
    Switching of ports was tried (Modem 2 in WAN 1 port and Modem 1 in WAN 2 port). Protocol Binding was set for the mail server to use port 25 through WAN 1. When tested, traceroute and telnet indicates that it goes to WAN2. Access Rule was added, but still has the same results.
    What can I do to make this work? Will this really work?

    Yes - you need to configure the IP address of the DNS servers in the SSL group policy you have created. If not - it is inherited from the default profile.
    HTH>

  • DNS SRV Proxy Lookup and Failover Mechanism / Unexpected Behavior

    Group,
    I came across some unexpected behavior yesterday I was wondering if someone could help shed some light on the problem. In my DNS I created this record: _sip._upd.platautofinance.com which when I do a query using MX Toolbox it is correctly reporting the following:
    On the SPA504 I have programmed the SRV records into the system using the following:
    So here is the issue, the phones will register correctly to the primary server but after a length of time ALL the phones will abandon ship and jump to the secondary server and stay there. I have to manually shut the secondary down, reboot the endpoints at which point they will re-register with the primary. So I think I need to understand the mechanism a bit better. Here is what I can think of:
    The phones are not using the primary DNS service record providers DNS servers, we are using OpenDNS instead of Network Solutions <-- Unlikely because the SPA would not be able to resolve the SIP SRV records / servers at all with a broken DNS resolution. I can tell by dropping from the primary to the secondary that resolution is taking place on the phone because they are jumping between the right ones.
    My understanding is the proxy fallback interval should have the phone register (and they should be checking periodically if the primary is available again and if so, re-register the to the lowest-weighted server) but that's not happening without a manual reboot. Once on the secondary they want to stay there.
    My firewall for both the primary and secondary servers do not answer ICMP. 
    So the question is: why do the SPA phones think the primary is offline? What is the mechanism or criteria the SPA uses to determine a server is offline and then rolling to the secondary? Why do they want to stick around the secondary which is using only a best effort connection when we have a bonded T on the primary?
    Thanks as always for your help and input group! Appreciate your time.

    Hello Adam,
    I believe it will be easier if you call SBSC and ask the questions directly. The questions are very good and exact. I will try to answer shortly. Assuming you use only CCA to configure the system.
    1. If you have set dns for your internet connection it should work, you may try with different dns servers. Please delete the SIP trunk and recreate it.
    2. Please delete the SIP trunk and recreate it.
    3. If you need to configure more codecs through CCA you may send feature request using envelope button of the CCA.
    I hope the above answers will be helpful although very short. If they are not helpful please contact SBSC and open a case.
    Best regards,
    Alex

  • Unexpected behavior error

    Header 1
    When running a self-built report using the IOM Tactical Reporting Universe.  This error is received intermittently, as at times the report runs without any issues (indicating no logic issues in the actual query).if we run rest of the reports on same universe reports working fine.we are using sap BO 3.1 sp 3. please help anyone on this.
    Error....Unexpected behavior (wis10901)
    Thanks,
    subbu.

    Hi sathish
    when we run that report sometimes it running successfully and sometime getting this error..
    why it happen cant understand..if i run 10 times 6 times it success and 4 times getting error like
    unexpected behaviour error.
    i have look into the functions all working fine..plz give me ur suggestions
    Thanks.

Maybe you are looking for