S_ALR_87013620 Diff in Total & Line Item Level

Hi All ,
I'm  running report S_ALR_87013620 for a particular cost center. Now the problem is that when i see Actual value is 30059.19 but if i  double click and select "Cost Centers: Actual Line Items"  system display value      43.283,65     
I also check value through t-code KSB1 iam getting value 43283.65. means actual vale is 43283.65  then why system displaying 30059.19 in total actual column
And when i exectute same Report using diffrent user id  then it showing correct value in total as well as in line item 
can any one help me to find out the root cause of this problem
Regards
Prakash Sharma

Hi Mishi,
check object authorization , in my case few object are missing .. i just take the screen shot of su53 and send to S&A team and issue is resolved
Regards
Prakash Sharma

Similar Messages

  • Report at line item level but also for document total for once only

    Dear all,
    seek for your help for the following issue
    There is a A/R invoice with 3 items
    There is a report for retrieving the line item level data from inv1, user would also like to add a column to display the Document total , but the problem is, each line item will also display the Document total, any method to only display the corresponding Document total for once only?
    Example, for AR invoice number 1234567:
    Currently:
    No.                ItemCode        Price      Qty    LineItemTotal      DocumentTotal
    1234567       Item-A            10           1       10                       100
    1234567       Item-B             50          1       50                       100
    1234567       Item-B             20          2       40                       100
    Requested to be presented as:
    No.                ItemCode        Price      Qty    LineItemTotal      DocumentTotal
    1234567       Item-A            10           1       10                       100
    1234567       Item-B             50          1       50                      
    1234567       Item-B             20          2       40                      
    Thank you very much!!!

    Hi,
    Try This.....
    select T0.DocNum ,T1.ItemCode ,T1.Price ,T1.Quantity ,T1.LineNum ,case  when T1.LineNum ='0' then T0.DocTotal else 0 end    from oinv T0 inner join INV1 T1 on T0.DocEntry =T1.DocEntry where T0.DocNum=[%0]
    Thanks
    Shafi
    Edited by: shafi_sunshine on Oct 19, 2011 12:50 PM

  • Switch to Open Item Management at a Line Item Level

    Hi Guru's,
    I want to change a non Open Item G/L account to an Open Item  at Line Item level, we are on version 6.4
    We have activated New G/L and I checked OSS note 175960, it says its not applicable if New G/L activated.
    I tried program FAGL_SWITCH_TO_OPEN_ITEM , it switched the account to Open Item but the problem here is it did't switch at line item level it is just showing total balance. My requirement is to switch at Line Item level.
    Is there any solution other than creating a new A/c with Open Item checked and transfering balances from old A/c to new A/c.
    Please suggest
    Thank You

    Hi,
    There are 3 ways to realize it.
    1. create a new account with XOPVW, then transfer the balance from old account to the new one. this is recommended by SAP.
    2. if you want to change  flag of XOPVW in this account, then make the balance to zero, then change this flag in FS00, at last trasnfer the balance back to this account-> Not recommended by SAP, because it is easy to cause data inconsistency.
    3. method in note:175960-> but report :RFSEPA02 and RFSEPA03 are not support since release 4.5A.
    So if possible, suggest you to use 1.
    Best Regards,
    Gladys

  • MIRO: Is displaying VAT amount at line item level possible?

    Hello,
    Total Tax Amount is available in the header of a MIRO document, but is it possible to show the VAT Amount at line item level? i.e. as another column in the grid?
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    You can not see VAT amount at Item level in MIRO.It will be allways at header level.
    Regards,
    Manish

  • TAX values in the line item level of PO

    Hi
    I am printing the PO form. I need to dispaly the tax values that is coming in the line item level.
    Can any one tell me where i will get these values.
    For every line item in the PO under the tab INVOICE we have the tax code and tax jurisdiction. Near to that there is a push button TAXES.. I need to fetch the values maintained under this.. Based on the condtion type,,
    Regards
    Ansari
    Edited by: Muhammed Ansari Abubekkar on Aug 27, 2009 3:46 PM

    Hi ,
    I have tried this option. But it does not give me the values on the basis of condition types. it gives only the totals.
    I am using ECC 6.0.. That button may be configuration dependent.
    Regards
    Ansari

  • In report painter report, line item level drilldown report requirment

    Dear All,
    I created one report in GRR1, when I execute the report i am not getting line item wise drilldown option. For example one cost center no of line itemwise posting ( g/ls wise)posting is there. By double clicking on that specific line item we will go that ledger and see the data available in that ledger.In standard reports that option available but my own reports I unable to go drilldown at ledger level cost reports.
    Please sugget anyone, where I am doing mistake in report creation level.
    Thanks
    M Srinivasa reddy
    Ph : 9637399076

    Thank you,
    I attached reports to Library based on that I am able to drilldown line item level of the report.Is it corret or any other way for line item level drilldown option for report painter reports
    Thanks
    M Srinivasa reddy

  • Shopping cart header status differs to status at line item level

    Hello
    I am using SRM 5.5 EC, got a situation where there is a single line shopping cart which has been approved. The status on the header is still showing "awaiting approval" but at line item level it shows as being "approved" and no follow on document has been created.
    Can anyone help and let me know why this has happened and how to change the header status now?
    Many Thanks in Advance
    Prakash

    OK found a solution

  • Customized drill-down report cannot go to line item level (FGI4 and FGI1)

    Hi Expert,
    I created a customized drill-down report using New GL features, as follows:
    FGI4 create form, with reference to form: 0SAPBLNCE-01
    FGI1 create report for the form created.
    After that I set some things like characteristic, variables, and output type.
    When I execute the report, the data shown cannot be drill-down to line item level:
    Goto > Line Item (this function is disabled).
    Kindly advise why I cannot goto line item level, where I copy from standard form: 0SAPBLNCE-01, which ha sthe features of drill-down to line item level.
    Thanks
    sbmel

    Hi sbmel,
    For calling up a line item report in a drill down report you need to make the below settins:-
    - You first have to generate the line item report with program RGRGENSI for your summary table.
    - Then assign the generated line item report to the summary report.
               Assiging the report is part of the 'Change drilldown report' function, which you reach by activating the characteristic selection field and then Extras -> Report assignment.
                In the dialog box that appears, choose the 'Other report type' function and insert the line item report generated earlier, as an ABAP report
    Regards,
    Gaurav
    Edited by: gka2707 on Jul 19, 2010 8:07 AM

  • Asset field blank in FS10N (Drilldown to line item level) report layout

    Hi all,
    i ahve posted a Retirement transaction to an asset and when i went to see the line item on the GL using/executing report FS10N for asset transactions GL and drill down to the line item level by double clicking on the period balances and I choose field "Asset" to be displayed in the layout, it is blank. How can I get report FS10N to display the asset number from the transaction?
    the field is available in the layout but when i pull it into the report it is Blank in the report.
    Any help would be appreciated. Thanks
    Jay

    Hello,
    FS10N shows only balance, FBL3N shows the line details.
    Add the asset as a special field via OBVU  (Table:  BSEG, Field: ANLN1).
    Regards
    Waza

  • Custom filed at line item level in order.jsp

    Hi,
    I want to add a custom material number field at the line item level that will search for the item related to the customer material number and populate the order.jsp.
    similar to the below mentioned Standard functionality:-
    In order.jsp when we enter a valid item no in the item text box
    and press enter then the related data of the item is populated in order.jsp.
    Is this possible ??
    If yes please let me know how can we achiese this.

    Satish,
    the problem with product search is that ....
    custommaterial number will be mapped with the item number for different customers in a separate table. so if i place the searc in proucts search tab it will fetch form product master.
    so I was think of extending the process flow and from jsp capture the value entered and trigger action from there make a item search following the standard process.
    but my problem is that I am not able to capture the value entered in the custom field when refresh is clicked?
    can you tell me how is the item search done when we enter the item number and press enter?
    please suggest

  • Substitution and activated the same at the line item level in order to subs

    I have created a substitution and activated the same at the line item level in order to substitute the ZRSPL (Payment Block) field by a constant value and a vendor invoice is posted using Transaction FB60. But the same is not working. When I post a vendor invoice using FB60, Payment Block field is being shown as blank instead of the constant value which I want to substitute.
    >
    > My prerequsite is mentioned below :
    > BKPF-TCODE = 'FB60' AND BKPF-BUKRS = 'ABC' AND ( BKPF-BLART = 'KR' OR
    > BKPF-BLART = 'KY' ) AND BSEG-DMBTR > '10000'

    Hi,
    I am not understanding the logic behind the prerequisites mentioned in your query.
    Payment block field exists only for vendor related line item.  However, you have not mentioned vendor reconciliation account in the prerequisites.  It means, this substitution will trigger for all the line items which is wrong.
    Or try following  options.....
    1) Substitution->Simulation
    2) Extras->Expert Trace
    Best Regards,
    Madhu

  • Line Item Level Coupons

    Hello Everyone,
    Are line item level coupons available where you tie a promotion to a particular item?  I know you can set it up where if you buy A01 you get A02 free, but is there a way to set that up as a 1-to-1 ratio?  Let me explain a little further...  Our client has end users placing orders through distributors, so the distributor is actually placing the order.  The end users apply and receive a promotion code when they sign up and place their first order (which must be done through a distributor).  The distributor may combine these orders from end users into one large order, therefore for each A01 that is on order, they give away a bag of items free (let's say A02), to that customer but they want to capture a note with that promotion that it is for a particular end user.  So, the question is, is it possible to track that only one promotion is given per one item (for each A01 on the order only allow the same number of free A02).  Also, is it possible for each promotion to add a note that will designate which end user it goes to?  Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
    Thank you in advance for your time!
    Kristen

    Hi Kristen,
    Do you still need help on this one?
    I am no completely clear on what you are after.
    When you set up a discount(coupon) you can limit the number of times it can be redeemed per user.  Is that what you are after?  Or is there more to it?
    There is no "note" associated with this.  Not sure what you mean by that.

  • Line Item Level Partner Determination

    Is it possible to determine line item level payee partner based on product.
    Please advise

    Hi Mike,
    I have a similar requirement at my current client. Where you ever able to figure out a solution for this requirement, if you did could you please share the information how you guys did it.
    Thanks
    Shajeel

  • Fixed Value Date at line item level is not in changable mode when copied

    Dear SDN Team,
    Hi i have a problem in the Fixed Value date at the line item level in the Return sales order.
    The Problem is When creating the return order with reference to the scheduling agreement (10.03.2010).  In the Return sales Order at the line item level the fixed value date is coping from scheduling agreement item (fixed value date eg: 31.12.2009)
    But i would like to have the fixed value date in the return order as 10.03.2010  but the field is greyed out.
    But normally when the sales document is created with reference to the preceding document the same will be copied.  But field is greyed out and it is not in changable mode.
    Can any one help how to solve this.
    I have checked also SAP Note where i did not find any messages.
    In normal scenario - when the order is created without any reference the fixed value date is in changable mode until the document is in open.
    Pleas help me to resolve this.
    With Regards,
    Jai

    Hi Lakshmipathi,
    I am sharing the resolution which was done to this requirement.
    We have a specific condition type with statisticaly used and with routine to have KWERT with zero value,
    Based on the different key combination. We have a specific key combination for the SA and SDoc and for this we need to maintain a condition record for the condition type with fixed value date and which will be linked to only the specific document.  Once this is done.
    We need to do update pricing in the sales order for the particular line item. by doing this the Fixed value date will be changed in the particular line item.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Jana

  • FI Validation rule error message problem at line item level

    Hello all.
    I have created a step within an FI Validation rule (OB28) at the document line item level.  I have set the  message to "E" for an error.  I have generated the validations.  When I test my step, the error is triggered, but triggered as an Information popup - warning and does not give me a hard stop.   Does anyone have an idea why this may happen?   I need this to be a hard stop but not a cancellation of the document entry.  I am using FV60 to enter my document.
    Thanks for help.
    mvp0821

    OSS note # 863267 explains answer.  Cannot create "error" message on ENJOY transactions - FV60 is included in this list.  "E" works on classic transactions.  
    Thanks for thinking about this.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Download internal table in debugger

    All, I have an internal table with 700,000 records. In debugging mode, I want to download that as a text file. How to achieve this. Thanks, Salil

  • Every day in calender is marked as if there is an event?

    Hello from Germany, since I created recuring events for all birthdays of friends and family in Outlook 2003, in calender every day is marked with this dot, even when there is no event? Thanks

  • Problem with auto start-stop script

    Hi to All, Logged as root. I have create in /etc/rc.d/init.d this file and saved as dbora (Oracle Linux 5.4): +#!/bin/sh+ +# chkconfig: 345 99 10+ +# description: Oracle auto start-stop script.+ +#+ +# Set ORA_HOME to be equivalent to the $ORACLE_HOM

  • Comment connecter une timecapsule et une livebox par ethernet pour profiter le la puissance de la timecapsule?

    Bonjour, Je possede une timecapsule qui me servait de borne wi-fi pour du wimax(internet par antenne). Maintenant je suis chez orange avec une livebox, mais je n'arrive pas à connecter la TC avec la livebox pour recréer mon réseau. Connaissez vous la

  • Apple's and nuts

    Could someone please explain to me why this awful update was even made? What were the great features they had to add to mess everything up. I think they should have waited until the bugs were gone to release it, and even if they didnt give us the opt