S.M.A.R.T Status is Failing?

My macbook pro15 2012 mid is having SMART status falling but my macbook is working well, how can I fix it ?

The only way you can 'fix' this, is by replacing the hard disk. Even if your MacBook isn't showing any obvious problems now, it might well start doing so in the near feature. Make sure that your backup of that disk is up-to-date!

Similar Messages

Add-on Status is Failed, but Add-on is connected

Good Day!
Hi Experts,
I had created an installer for my Add-on for the client. This is a project from SAP B1 Studio.
SAP B1 version is 9.0 PL11.
1. The add-on is running ok in Debug Mode.
2. I've successfully created an ARD File.
3. Successfully installed ARD File.
4. On Add-on Manager, when I tried to click Start, the add-on says Incorrect Connection String for Add-on. Even if the Status is Failed, the Add-on still executes. It still displays the custom form, the events, CFL etc.
I've used the SAPBouicom.Dll in my debug folder, and I ensured the latest SAP B1 Studio and DI API is installed (PL11). I even removed the old files and reinstalled but the same result appears.
Your help is greatly appreciated in this matter.

i had already a Debug Code in my Environment.
Dim sConnectionString As String
SboGuiApi = New SAPbouiCOM.SboGuiApi
sConnectionString = Environment.GetCommandLineArgs.GetValue(1).ToString
                Try
                    SboGuiApi.Connect(sConnectionString)
                    ' Causes an Error Here but if I don't terminate the Add-on here, the Add-on will still run
                Catch ex As Exception
                         'System.Windows.Forms.MessageBox.Show("No SAP Business One Application was found")
                         'End
                    Try
SBO_Application = SboGuiApi.GetApplication()

Last status is failed but the bios is install successfully

hi,
I have win 7 prof 64 bit - clients and active directory on windows 8. on one client i have problem with bios, the bios is in te advertised programs - its install on clients but last status is failed, but installation of bios is successfully, and the
bios instal again, and again......
regards

By default, SCCM considers an error code of 0 successful and anything else a failure (with a couple of exceptions but generally speaking).
However, remember that the creator of any application you are running doesn't necessarily abide by that.
For all you know, error code 1073807364
might mean:
- Update successful
- Update successful but restart required
- Nothing to update (because the computer already has the same BIOS version as what you are trying to install
- etc..
You need to figure out exactly what that error code means on the software you are running and if it is the case that that's actually a successful error code, depending on how you are calling it, you either configure SCCM to accept that error code as a success
or you wrap your main program around a script that transforms that particular code into a 0, which will then be interpreted by SCCM as a success.
Fausto

Request status in Fail over

          Process to Find request status if fail over happen in middle of some request at
          application level, because I need this to do control at application level. Some
          will help me in this issue.


failover is automatic. you only failover for idempotent method invocations.
          there is no control that you can use in the application. except when the
          failover also fails and returns an exception to the application for the
          application to handle.
          sree
          "srouthu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
          news:40bec785$1@mktnews1...
          >
          > Process to Find request status if fail over happen in middle of some
          request at
          > application level, because I need this to do control at application level.
          Some
          > will help me in this issue.

EMD_MAINTENANCE.EXECUTE_EM_DBMS_JOB_PROCS(); job status is failed

Hi all,
after I import dump fully database , the EMD_MAINTENANCE.EXECUTE_EM_DBMS_JOB_PROCS(); job status is failed,
what is the reason and how could I start it successfully.
appreciate your help.

user2075318 wrote:
Osama , thx for the updates,
but unfortunatly I don't have access to oracle support site,
it's grate if you can give me the 444033.1 document please.you need to have valid license to get oracle.support.com , otherwise i can't post anything here it will be illegal to do that

(UCCE) CUIC - Dataset status is Failed (Database error)

I copied the RD Skill Summary Weekly Historical report definition, added several formula fields. I copied the report because this isn't my forte and didn't want to chance mucking up the existing one.
It didn't take long to figure out that if I change the datatype or check the export as hh:mm:ss checkbox -- I get the "Dataset status is Failed (Database error)" error when running any reports against that definition. I then have to delete the reports, delete the definition, recreate the definition, and recreate the reports.
For some reason though, that error has been popping up intermittently without any changes to the definition. I tried doing an export of both the definition and reports (prior to getting the error when running the reports), and then deleting and importing after getting the error, but end up getting the same error. Full error details attached.
Basically, I'm recreating the report definition and reports every day throughout the day. I'm getting pretty quick at it, but it's still a pita. Any ideas are greatly appreciated.
thanks,
will

Nevermind - the stock report definition from cco is 15128 characters long. it's getting truncated down to 15000. Awesome.

Making Import status as failed

Hi All,
Is there any way to make the import process as failed by using the event script.
Before file import or by using after file import.
Thanks Ravi.

Hi,
you can set the status to fail in the sub-event "EndProcess" of event script ImportAction.
HTH

Express bios update last status i failed

i have sccm 2007 and clients win 7 64 bit, on two clients win 7 64 bit, in advertised programs last status of express bios update (HP) is failed, but the bios install succesfully, when the bios upgrade from advertised programs computer reboot and bios
install with status successfully, when komputer system win 7 run in advertised program last status is failed, help me

Yes, I know this is an old post, but I’m trying to clean them up.
When you applied the BIOS update, Did it reboot the computer without telling CM07?
Garth Jones | My blogs: Enhansoft and
Old Blog site | Twitter:
@GarthMJ

Service Pack Update Upgrade Status showing failed

I have SharePoint 2010 Server. I upgraded the same to SP2. In upgrade status it shows failed but once I run command
(get-spserver $env:computername).NeedsUpgrade.
It shows false. How to check if patch is successful?
Please remember to mark the replies as answers or vote as helpful if they help.

Hi,
From your description, my understanding is that upgrade status shows failed when you upgrade SharePoint, but when you run PowerShell Command, it shows “false”.
Have you run the SharePoint Configuration wizard again after the status shows failed, then check if it will show successful status?
As upgrade status is failed, you should check if there are some error message in your USL log.
In addition, you could check the version of SharePoint if it is upgraded to the correct version number.
Best Regards
Vincent Han
TechNet Community Support

[6:01:13 PM] Status: Error UVSC Internal Error Detail: [UVSC_DBG_ENUMERATE_BP, MSG: 0x2000, STATUS: 0x1] (1) Status: Run failed.

sir,
we are working in arm 7 mcb2300. we get an error "[UVSC_DBG_ENUMERATE_BP, MSG: 0x2000, STATUS: 0x1] (1)
Status: Run failed." during downloading. we dont know whether it is a software or hardware error. please guide us to rectify it.
thank you

Figured it out. Somehow the projects that I was working on got corrupted somehow. After another reinstall I opened an example project, not one of the many that are my own, and it worked. I had to copy and past the code out of the one project and into a new one, but it is working. Don't know how my projects got messed up in the middle of working on them.
Now back to actually getting work done.

'systemctl --user status' returns 'Failed to get D-Bus connection'

Basically I am trying to run a user session of systemd. Up to now, this worked without doing the additional parts from the systemd/User wiki-page. Now it returns 'Failed to get D-Bus connection: No such file or directory' or 'Failed to read server status: Input/output error' (the first one when I try it from the TTY, the second one from within xfce / urxvtc). Even after doing the wiki-page, it still returns the two error messages.
My current 'systemctl status':
● SHODAN
State: running
Jobs: 0 queued
Failed: 0 units
Since: Fr 2014-04-25 18:33:55 CEST; 6min ago
CGroup: /
├─1 /sbin/init
├─system.slice
│ ├─rtkit-daemon.service
│ │ └─466 /usr/lib/rtkit/rtkit-daemon
│ ├─polkit.service
│ │ └─376 /usr/lib/polkit-1/polkitd --no-debug
│ ├─lightdm.service
│ │ ├─279 /usr/bin/lightdm
│ │ └─283 /usr/sbin/X :0 -seat seat0 -auth /run/lightdm/root/:0 -nolisten tcp vt1 -novtswitch
│ ├─systemd-logind.service
│ │ └─276 /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-logind
│ ├─dbus.service
│ │ └─274 /usr/bin/dbus-daemon --system --address=systemd: --nofork --nopidfile --systemd-activation
│ ├─wicd.service
│ │ ├─273 /usr/bin/python2 -O /usr/share/wicd/daemon/wicd-daemon.py --no-daemon
│ │ ├─289 /usr/bin/python2 -O /usr/share/wicd/daemon/monitor.py
│ │ └─365 wpa_supplicant -B -i wlp4s0 -c /var/lib/wicd/configurations/00184db47218 -Dwext
│ ├─systemd-udevd.service
│ │ └─143 /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
│ └─systemd-journald.service
│ └─119 /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-journald
└─user.slice
└─user-1000.slice
└─session-c2.scope
├─ 314 lightdm --session-child 13 20
├─ 352 /bin/sh /etc/xdg/xfce4/xinitrc -- /etc/X11/xinit/xserverrc
├─ 359 dbus-launch --sh-syntax --exit-with-session
├─ 362 /usr/bin/dbus-daemon --fork --print-pid 4 --print-address 6 --session
├─ 374 xfce4-session
├─ 384 /usr/lib/xfce4/xfconf/xfconfd
├─ 395 /usr/bin/gpg-agent --sh --daemon --enable-ssh-support --write-env-file /home/dustball/.cache/gpg-agent-info
├─ 411 xfwm4
├─ 419 xfce4-panel
├─ 421 Thunar --daemon
├─ 423 xfdesktop
├─ 425 urxvtd
├─ 448 python2 /usr/bin/quicktile -d
├─ 465 /usr/bin/pulseaudio --start --log-target=syslog
├─ 480 /usr/bin/python2 -O /usr/share/wicd/gtk/wicd-client.py --tray
├─ 481 grep -v Unhandled action type _OB_WM
├─ 482 xfsettingsd
├─ 483 xfce4-volumed
├─ 488 mpd
├─ 504 /usr/lib/pulse/gconf-helper
├─ 506 /usr/lib/GConf/gconfd-2
├─ 525 /usr/lib/xfce4/notifyd/xfce4-notifyd
├─ 529 /usr/lib/xfce4/panel/wrapper /usr/lib/xfce4/panel/plugins/libsystray.so 6 12583017 systray Benachrichtigungsfl che Fl che, in der Symbole f r Benachrichtigungen erscheinen
├─ 531 /usr/lib/xfce4/panel/wrapper /usr/lib/xfce4/panel/plugins/libactions.so 2 12583018 actions Aktionskn pfe Abmelden, sperren oder andere Systemaktionen
├─ 532 /usr/lib/xfce4/panel/wrapper /usr/lib/xfce4/panel/plugins/libmixer.so 16 12583019 mixer Lautst rkeregler Lautst rke einstellen
├─ 548 xfce4-appfinder --collapsed
├─ 555 /usr/bin/python2 /usr/bin/sonata
├─1131 /usr/lib/chromium/chromium --ppapi-flash-path=/usr/lib/PepperFlash/libpepflashplayer.so --ppapi-flash-version=13.0.0.206 --enable-print-preview
├─1132 liferea
├─1133 claws-mail
├─1134 kvirc -m
├─1135 /usr/lib32/skype/skype
├─1176 /usr/lib/chromium/chromium --ppapi-flash-path=/usr/lib/PepperFlash/libpepflashplayer.so --ppapi-flash-version=13.0.0.206 --enable-print-preview
├─1177 /usr/lib/chromium/chrome-sandbox /usr/lib/chromium/chromium --type=zygote --ppapi-flash-path=/usr/lib/PepperFlash/libpepflashplayer.so --ppapi-flash-version=13.0.0.206
├─1178 /usr/lib/chromium/chromium --type=zygote --ppapi-flash-path=/usr/lib/PepperFlash/libpepflashplayer.so --ppapi-flash-version=13.0.0.206
├─1181 tmux new-session
├─1184 tmux new-session
├─1185 -zsh
├─1268 /usr/lib/at-spi2-core/at-spi-bus-launcher
├─1567 /usr/bin/dbus-daemon --config-file=/etc/at-spi2/accessibility.conf --nofork --print-address 3
├─1588 /usr/lib/at-spi2-core/at-spi2-registryd --use-gnome-session
├─1600 /usr/lib/chromium/nacl_helper
├─1755 /usr/lib/chromium/chromium --type=zygote --ppapi-flash-path=/usr/lib/PepperFlash/libpepflashplayer.so --ppapi-flash-version=13.0.0.206
├─1824 /usr/lib/chromium/chromium --type=renderer --lang=de --force-fieldtrials=Prerender/PrerenderControl/UMA-New-Install-Uniformity-Trial/Experiment/UMA-Session-Randomized-Uniformity-Trial-5-Percent/group_09/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-1-Percent/group_21/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-10-Percent/group_03/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-100-Percent/group_01/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-20-Percent/group_01/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-5-Percent/group_11/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-50-Percent/default/ --extension-process --renderer-print-preview --ppapi-flash-path=/usr/lib/PepperFlash/libpepflashplayer.so --ppapi-flash-version=13.0.0.206 --enable-deadline-scheduling --disable-accelerated-video-decode --channel=1131.1.59959206
├─1847 /usr/lib/chromium/chromium --type=renderer --lang=de --force-fieldtrials=Prerender/PrerenderControl/UMA-New-Install-Uniformity-Trial/Experiment/UMA-Session-Randomized-Uniformity-Trial-5-Percent/group_09/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-1-Percent/group_21/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-10-Percent/group_03/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-100-Percent/group_01/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-20-Percent/group_01/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-5-Percent/group_11/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-50-Percent/default/ --extension-process --renderer-print-preview --ppapi-flash-path=/usr/lib/PepperFlash/libpepflashplayer.so --ppapi-flash-version=13.0.0.206 --enable-deadline-scheduling --disable-accelerated-video-decode --channel=1131.2.164356213
├─1857 /usr/lib/chromium/chromium --type=renderer --lang=de --force-fieldtrials=Prerender/PrerenderControl/UMA-New-Install-Uniformity-Trial/Experiment/UMA-Session-Randomized-Uniformity-Trial-5-Percent/group_09/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-1-Percent/group_21/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-10-Percent/group_03/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-100-Percent/group_01/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-20-Percent/group_01/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-5-Percent/group_11/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-50-Percent/default/ --extension-process --renderer-print-preview --ppapi-flash-path=/usr/lib/PepperFlash/libpepflashplayer.so --ppapi-flash-version=13.0.0.206 --enable-deadline-scheduling --disable-accelerated-video-decode --channel=1131.3.96609819
├─1871 /usr/lib/chromium/chromium --type=renderer --lang=de --force-fieldtrials=Prerender/PrerenderControl/UMA-New-Install-Uniformity-Trial/Experiment/UMA-Session-Randomized-Uniformity-Trial-5-Percent/group_09/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-1-Percent/group_21/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-10-Percent/group_03/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-100-Percent/group_01/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-20-Percent/group_01/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-5-Percent/group_11/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-50-Percent/default/ --extension-process --renderer-print-preview --ppapi-flash-path=/usr/lib/PepperFlash/libpepflashplayer.so --ppapi-flash-version=13.0.0.206 --enable-deadline-scheduling --disable-accelerated-video-decode --channel=1131.4.134029888
├─1880 /usr/lib/chromium/chromium --type=renderer --lang=de --force-fieldtrials=Prerender/PrerenderControl/UMA-New-Install-Uniformity-Trial/Experiment/UMA-Session-Randomized-Uniformity-Trial-5-Percent/group_09/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-1-Percent/group_21/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-10-Percent/group_03/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-100-Percent/group_01/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-20-Percent/group_01/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-5-Percent/group_11/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-50-Percent/default/ --extension-process --renderer-print-preview --ppapi-flash-path=/usr/lib/PepperFlash/libpepflashplayer.so --ppapi-flash-version=13.0.0.206 --enable-deadline-scheduling --disable-accelerated-video-decode --channel=1131.6.5115895
├─1886 /usr/lib/chromium/chromium --type=renderer --lang=de --force-fieldtrials=Prerender/PrerenderControl/UMA-New-Install-Uniformity-Trial/Experiment/UMA-Session-Randomized-Uniformity-Trial-5-Percent/group_09/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-1-Percent/group_21/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-10-Percent/group_03/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-100-Percent/group_01/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-20-Percent/group_01/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-5-Percent/group_11/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-50-Percent/default/ --extension-process --renderer-print-preview --ppapi-flash-path=/usr/lib/PepperFlash/libpepflashplayer.so --ppapi-flash-version=13.0.0.206 --enable-deadline-scheduling --disable-accelerated-video-decode --channel=1131.7.176936345
├─1891 /usr/lib/chromium/chromium --type=renderer --lang=de --force-fieldtrials=Prerender/PrerenderControl/UMA-New-Install-Uniformity-Trial/Experiment/UMA-Session-Randomized-Uniformity-Trial-5-Percent/group_09/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-1-Percent/group_21/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-10-Percent/group_03/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-100-Percent/group_01/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-20-Percent/group_01/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-5-Percent/group_11/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-50-Percent/default/ --extension-process --renderer-print-preview --ppapi-flash-path=/usr/lib/PepperFlash/libpepflashplayer.so --ppapi-flash-version=13.0.0.206 --enable-deadline-scheduling --disable-accelerated-video-decode --channel=1131.8.160718626
├─1896 /usr/lib/chromium/chromium --type=renderer --lang=de --force-fieldtrials=Prerender/PrerenderControl/UMA-New-Install-Uniformity-Trial/Experiment/UMA-Session-Randomized-Uniformity-Trial-5-Percent/group_09/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-1-Percent/group_21/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-10-Percent/group_03/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-100-Percent/group_01/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-20-Percent/group_01/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-5-Percent/group_11/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-50-Percent/default/ --extension-process --renderer-print-preview --ppapi-flash-path=/usr/lib/PepperFlash/libpepflashplayer.so --ppapi-flash-version=13.0.0.206 --enable-deadline-scheduling --disable-accelerated-video-decode --channel=1131.9.165553601
├─1940 /usr/lib/dconf/dconf-service
├─2013 /usr/lib/chromium/chromium --type=gpu-process --channel=1131.12.1289180957 --supports-dual-gpus=false --gpu-driver-bug-workarounds=0,1,17,28,34 --disable-accelerated-video-decode --gpu-vendor-id=0x10de --gpu-device-id=0x0425 --gpu-driver-vendor=NVIDIA --gpu-driver-version=337.1
├─2025 /usr/lib/chromium/chromium --type=gpu-process --channel=1131.12.1289180957 --supports-dual-gpus=false --gpu-driver-bug-workarounds=0,1,17,28,34 --disable-accelerated-video-decode --gpu-vendor-id=0x10de --gpu-device-id=0x0425 --gpu-driver-vendor=NVIDIA --gpu-driver-version=337.1
├─2105 /usr/lib/chromium/chromium --type=renderer --lang=de --force-fieldtrials=Prerender/PrerenderControl/UMA-New-Install-Uniformity-Trial/Experiment/UMA-Session-Randomized-Uniformity-Trial-5-Percent/group_09/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-1-Percent/group_21/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-10-Percent/group_03/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-100-Percent/group_01/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-20-Percent/group_01/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-5-Percent/group_11/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-50-Percent/default/ --extension-process --renderer-print-preview --ppapi-flash-path=/usr/lib/PepperFlash/libpepflashplayer.so --ppapi-flash-version=13.0.0.206 --enable-deadline-scheduling --disable-accelerated-video-decode --channel=1131.16.111786888
├─2121 bash /usr/bin/steam
├─2131 bash /home/dustball/.local/share/Steam/steam.sh
├─2132 tee /tmp/dumps/dustball_stdout.txt
├─2226 /home/dustball/.local/share/Steam/ubuntu12_32/steam
├─2415 /usr/lib/chromium/chromium --type=renderer --lang=de --force-fieldtrials=Prerender/PrerenderControl/UMA-New-Install-Uniformity-Trial/Experiment/UMA-Session-Randomized-Uniformity-Trial-5-Percent/group_09/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-1-Percent/group_21/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-10-Percent/group_03/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-100-Percent/group_01/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-20-Percent/group_01/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-5-Percent/group_11/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-50-Percent/default/ --renderer-print-preview --ppapi-flash-path=/usr/lib/PepperFlash/libpepflashplayer.so --ppapi-flash-version=13.0.0.206 --enable-deadline-scheduling --disable-accelerated-video-decode --channel=1131.18.32337900
├─2423 /usr/lib/chromium/chromium --type=renderer --lang=de --force-fieldtrials=Prerender/PrerenderControl/UMA-New-Install-Uniformity-Trial/Experiment/UMA-Session-Randomized-Uniformity-Trial-5-Percent/group_09/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-1-Percent/group_21/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-10-Percent/group_03/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-100-Percent/group_01/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-20-Percent/group_01/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-5-Percent/group_11/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-50-Percent/default/ --renderer-print-preview --ppapi-flash-path=/usr/lib/PepperFlash/libpepflashplayer.so --ppapi-flash-version=13.0.0.206 --enable-deadline-scheduling --disable-accelerated-video-decode --channel=1131.19.132593708
├─2432 /usr/lib/chromium/chromium --type=renderer --lang=de --force-fieldtrials=Prerender/PrerenderControl/UMA-New-Install-Uniformity-Trial/Experiment/UMA-Session-Randomized-Uniformity-Trial-5-Percent/group_09/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-1-Percent/group_21/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-10-Percent/group_03/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-100-Percent/group_01/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-20-Percent/group_01/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-5-Percent/group_11/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-50-Percent/default/ --renderer-print-preview --ppapi-flash-path=/usr/lib/PepperFlash/libpepflashplayer.so --ppapi-flash-version=13.0.0.206 --enable-deadline-scheduling --disable-accelerated-video-decode --channel=1131.20.6353944
├─2452 /usr/lib/chromium/chromium --type=renderer --lang=de --force-fieldtrials=Prerender/PrerenderControl/UMA-New-Install-Uniformity-Trial/Experiment/UMA-Session-Randomized-Uniformity-Trial-5-Percent/group_09/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-1-Percent/group_21/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-10-Percent/group_03/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-100-Percent/group_01/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-20-Percent/group_01/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-5-Percent/group_11/UMA-Uniformity-Trial-50-Percent/default/ --renderer-print-preview --ppapi-flash-path=/usr/lib/PepperFlash/libpepflashplayer.so --ppapi-flash-version=13.0.0.206 --enable-deadline-scheduling --disable-accelerated-video-decode --channel=1131.22.126548679
├─2465 /usr/lib/chromium/chromium --type=ppapi --channel=1131.23.955061051 --ppapi-flash-args --lang=de
└─2685 systemctl status

I did the dbus-setup according to the systemd/User part in the wiki.
$ cd $XDG_RUNTIME_DIR/systemd/ && ls -lah |grep private && pwd
srwxr-xr-x 1 dustball dustball 0 25. Apr 22:13 private
/run/user/1000/systemd
Do I need to enable the dbus somehow else than via
sudo systemctl --global enable dbus.socket

Application install starts but status is failed

Hi guys,
I'm running into an issue where I'm deploying Microsoft Office 2010 Pro and although the install starts the status in Software Center is "Failed". Once application finishes installing and I click on "Reply" button status changes to "Installed".
This seems to happen only with this software.
The fail error code is: 0x87D00324(-2016410844).
Doing a search on the forums I see that people are suggesting to try a different detection methods for my deployment and I have tried different ones but to no luck. I also tried starting the install by launching .exe and .msi but that didn't make a difference.
Do you guys have any suggestions?
Steve

+++ Starting Install enforcement for App DT "Microsoft Office 2010 Pro" ApplicationDeliveryType - ScopeId_352419C3-121B-4F48-A71E-DAC7E1D9A151/DeploymentType_390a03d8-32b9-4622-88ce-d3e201274977, Revision - 2, ContentPath - C:\Windows\ccmcache\1, Execution Context - System AppEnforce 9/4/2014 10:33:53 AM 1576 (0x0628)
A user is logged on to the system. AppEnforce 9/4/2014 10:33:53 AM 1576 (0x0628)
Performing detection of app deployment type Microsoft Office 2010 Pro(ScopeId_352419C3-121B-4F48-A71E-DAC7E1D9A151/DeploymentType_390a03d8-32b9-4622-88ce-d3e201274977, revision 2) for system. AppEnforce 9/4/2014 10:33:53 AM 1576 (0x0628)
+++ Application not discovered. [AppDT Id: ScopeId_352419C3-121B-4F48-A71E-DAC7E1D9A151/DeploymentType_390a03d8-32b9-4622-88ce-d3e201274977, Revision: 2] AppEnforce 9/4/2014 10:33:53 AM 1576 (0x0628)
App enforcement environment:
Context: Machine
Command line: setup.exe
Allow user interaction: Yes
UI mode: 1
User token: null
Session Id: 2
Content path: C:\Windows\ccmcache\1
Working directory: AppEnforce 9/4/2014 10:33:53 AM 1576 (0x0628)
Prepared working directory: C:\Windows\ccmcache\1 AppEnforce 9/4/2014 10:33:53 AM 1576 (0x0628)
Prepared command line: "C:\Windows\ccmcache\1\setup.exe" AppEnforce 9/4/2014 10:33:53 AM 1576 (0x0628)
Executing Command line: "C:\Windows\ccmcache\1\setup.exe" with user context AppEnforce 9/4/2014 10:33:53 AM 1576 (0x0628)
Working directory C:\Windows\ccmcache\1 AppEnforce 9/4/2014 10:33:53 AM 1576 (0x0628)
Post install behavior is BasedOnExitCode AppEnforce 9/4/2014 10:33:53 AM 1576 (0x0628)
Waiting for process 4340 to finish. Timeout = 120 minutes. AppEnforce 9/4/2014 10:33:53 AM 1576 (0x0628)
Process 4340 terminated with exitcode: 0 AppEnforce 9/4/2014 10:33:53 AM 1576 (0x0628)
Looking for exit code 0 in exit codes table... AppEnforce 9/4/2014 10:33:53 AM 1576 (0x0628)
Matched exit code 0 to a Success entry in exit codes table. AppEnforce 9/4/2014 10:33:53 AM 1576 (0x0628)
Performing detection of app deployment type Microsoft Office 2010 Pro(ScopeId_352419C3-121B-4F48-A71E-DAC7E1D9A151/DeploymentType_390a03d8-32b9-4622-88ce-d3e201274977, revision 2) for system. AppEnforce 9/4/2014 10:33:53 AM 1576 (0x0628)
+++ Application not discovered. [AppDT Id: ScopeId_352419C3-121B-4F48-A71E-DAC7E1D9A151/DeploymentType_390a03d8-32b9-4622-88ce-d3e201274977, Revision: 2] AppEnforce 9/4/2014 10:33:53 AM 1576 (0x0628)
++++++ App enforcement completed (0 seconds) for App DT "Microsoft Office 2010 Pro" [ScopeId_352419C3-121B-4F48-A71E-DAC7E1D9A151/DeploymentType_390a03d8-32b9-4622-88ce-d3e201274977], Revision: 2, User SID: ] ++++++ AppEnforce 9/4/2014 10:33:53 AM 1576 (0x0628)
+++ Starting Uninstall enforcement for App DT "Microsoft Office 2010 Pro" ApplicationDeliveryType - ScopeId_352419C3-121B-4F48-A71E-DAC7E1D9A151/DeploymentType_390a03d8-32b9-4622-88ce-d3e201274977, Revision - 2, ContentPath - C:\Windows\ccmcache\1, Execution Context - System AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:11:30 AM 4496 (0x1190)
A user is logged on to the system. AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:11:30 AM 4496 (0x1190)
Performing detection of app deployment type Microsoft Office 2010 Pro(ScopeId_352419C3-121B-4F48-A71E-DAC7E1D9A151/DeploymentType_390a03d8-32b9-4622-88ce-d3e201274977, revision 2) for system. AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:11:30 AM 4496 (0x1190)
+++ Discovered application [AppDT Id: ScopeId_352419C3-121B-4F48-A71E-DAC7E1D9A151/DeploymentType_390a03d8-32b9-4622-88ce-d3e201274977, Revision: 2] AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:11:30 AM 4496 (0x1190)
App enforcement environment:
Context: Machine
Command line: msiexec /x "x86\ProPlus.WW\ProPlusWW.msi"
Allow user interaction: Yes
UI mode: 1
User token: null
Session Id: 2
Content path: C:\Windows\ccmcache\1
Working directory: AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:11:30 AM 4496 (0x1190)
Prepared working directory: C:\Windows\ccmcache\1 AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:11:30 AM 4496 (0x1190)
Found executable file msiexec with complete path C:\Windows\system32\msiexec.exe AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:11:30 AM 4496 (0x1190)
Prepared command line: "C:\Windows\system32\msiexec.exe" /x "x86\ProPlus.WW\ProPlusWW.msi" AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:11:30 AM 4496 (0x1190)
Executing Command line: "C:\Windows\system32\msiexec.exe" /x "x86\ProPlus.WW\ProPlusWW.msi" with user context AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:11:30 AM 4496 (0x1190)
Working directory C:\Windows\ccmcache\1 AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:11:30 AM 4496 (0x1190)
Post install behavior is BasedOnExitCode AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:11:30 AM 4496 (0x1190)
Waiting for process 2688 to finish. Timeout = 120 minutes. AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:11:30 AM 4496 (0x1190)
Process 2688 terminated with exitcode: 1603 AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:11:47 AM 4496 (0x1190)
Looking for exit code 1603 in exit codes table... AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:11:47 AM 4496 (0x1190)
Unmatched exit code (1603) is considered an execution failure. AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:11:47 AM 4496 (0x1190)
++++++ App enforcement completed (16 seconds) for App DT "Microsoft Office 2010 Pro" [ScopeId_352419C3-121B-4F48-A71E-DAC7E1D9A151/DeploymentType_390a03d8-32b9-4622-88ce-d3e201274977], Revision: 2, User SID: ] ++++++ AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:11:47 AM 4496 (0x1190)
+++ Starting Uninstall enforcement for App DT "Microsoft Office 2010 Pro" ApplicationDeliveryType - ScopeId_352419C3-121B-4F48-A71E-DAC7E1D9A151/DeploymentType_390a03d8-32b9-4622-88ce-d3e201274977, Revision - 2, ContentPath - C:\Windows\ccmcache\1, Execution Context - System AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:11:55 AM 4496 (0x1190)
A user is logged on to the system. AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:11:55 AM 4496 (0x1190)
Performing detection of app deployment type Microsoft Office 2010 Pro(ScopeId_352419C3-121B-4F48-A71E-DAC7E1D9A151/DeploymentType_390a03d8-32b9-4622-88ce-d3e201274977, revision 2) for system. AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:11:55 AM 4496 (0x1190)
+++ Discovered application [AppDT Id: ScopeId_352419C3-121B-4F48-A71E-DAC7E1D9A151/DeploymentType_390a03d8-32b9-4622-88ce-d3e201274977, Revision: 2] AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:11:55 AM 4496 (0x1190)
App enforcement environment:
Context: Machine
Command line: msiexec /x "x86\ProPlus.WW\ProPlusWW.msi"
Allow user interaction: Yes
UI mode: 1
User token: null
Session Id: 2
Content path: C:\Windows\ccmcache\1
Working directory: AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:11:55 AM 4496 (0x1190)
Prepared working directory: C:\Windows\ccmcache\1 AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:11:55 AM 4496 (0x1190)
Found executable file msiexec with complete path C:\Windows\system32\msiexec.exe AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:11:55 AM 4496 (0x1190)
Prepared command line: "C:\Windows\system32\msiexec.exe" /x "x86\ProPlus.WW\ProPlusWW.msi" AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:11:55 AM 4496 (0x1190)
Executing Command line: "C:\Windows\system32\msiexec.exe" /x "x86\ProPlus.WW\ProPlusWW.msi" with user context AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:11:55 AM 4496 (0x1190)
Working directory C:\Windows\ccmcache\1 AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:11:55 AM 4496 (0x1190)
Post install behavior is BasedOnExitCode AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:11:55 AM 4496 (0x1190)
Waiting for process 1544 to finish. Timeout = 120 minutes. AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:11:55 AM 4496 (0x1190)
Process 1544 terminated with exitcode: 1618 AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:12:06 AM 4496 (0x1190)
Looking for exit code 1618 in exit codes table... AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:12:06 AM 4496 (0x1190)
++++++ App enforcement completed (11 seconds) for App DT "Microsoft Office 2010 Pro" [ScopeId_352419C3-121B-4F48-A71E-DAC7E1D9A151/DeploymentType_390a03d8-32b9-4622-88ce-d3e201274977], Revision: 2, User SID: ] ++++++ AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:12:07 AM 4496 (0x1190)
+++ Starting Install enforcement for App DT "CMTrace" ApplicationDeliveryType - ScopeId_352419C3-121B-4F48-A71E-DAC7E1D9A151/DeploymentType_355e20a1-4f9d-443a-8a6d-7e0c9df56fc6, Revision - 1, ContentPath - C:\Windows\ccmcache\2, Execution Context - User AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:14:12 AM 4596 (0x11F4)
A user is logged on to the system. AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:14:12 AM 4596 (0x11F4)
Performing detection of app deployment type CMTrace(ScopeId_352419C3-121B-4F48-A71E-DAC7E1D9A151/DeploymentType_355e20a1-4f9d-443a-8a6d-7e0c9df56fc6, revision 1) for user. AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:14:12 AM 4596 (0x11F4)
+++ Application not discovered. [AppDT Id: ScopeId_352419C3-121B-4F48-A71E-DAC7E1D9A151/DeploymentType_355e20a1-4f9d-443a-8a6d-7e0c9df56fc6, Revision: 1] AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:14:12 AM 4596 (0x11F4)
App enforcement environment:
Context: User
Command line: "install.bat"
Allow user interaction: Yes
UI mode: 1
User token: not null
Session Id: 2
Content path: C:\Windows\ccmcache\2
Working directory: AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:14:12 AM 4596 (0x11F4)
Prepared working directory: C:\Windows\ccmcache\2 AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:14:12 AM 4596 (0x11F4)
Prepared command line: "C:\Windows\ccmcache\2\install.bat" AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:14:12 AM 4596 (0x11F4)
Executing Command line: "C:\Windows\ccmcache\2\install.bat" with user context AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:14:12 AM 4596 (0x11F4)
Working directory C:\Windows\ccmcache\2 AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:14:12 AM 4596 (0x11F4)
Post install behavior is BasedOnExitCode AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:14:12 AM 4596 (0x11F4)
Waiting for process 5028 to finish. Timeout = 120 minutes. AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:14:12 AM 4596 (0x11F4)
Process 5028 terminated with exitcode: 0 AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:14:12 AM 4596 (0x11F4)
Looking for exit code 0 in exit codes table... AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:14:12 AM 4596 (0x11F4)
Matched exit code 0 to a Success entry in exit codes table. AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:14:12 AM 4596 (0x11F4)
Performing detection of app deployment type CMTrace(ScopeId_352419C3-121B-4F48-A71E-DAC7E1D9A151/DeploymentType_355e20a1-4f9d-443a-8a6d-7e0c9df56fc6, revision 1) for user. AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:14:12 AM 4596 (0x11F4)
+++ Discovered application [AppDT Id: ScopeId_352419C3-121B-4F48-A71E-DAC7E1D9A151/DeploymentType_355e20a1-4f9d-443a-8a6d-7e0c9df56fc6, Revision: 1] AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:14:12 AM 4596 (0x11F4)
++++++ App enforcement completed (0 seconds) for App DT "CMTrace" [ScopeId_352419C3-121B-4F48-A71E-DAC7E1D9A151/DeploymentType_355e20a1-4f9d-443a-8a6d-7e0c9df56fc6], Revision: 1, User SID: S-1-5-21-1792559092-1865782889-1767051203-1000] ++++++ AppEnforce 9/4/2014 11:14:12 AM 4596 (0x11F4)
The weird thing is that the Failed status is as soon as the application starts installing. I just run setup.exe in the command line.

Program installed but SCCM advertisement status of failed

Ok, i have scoured this forum and I have not found a direct answer to what i'm about to ask, so if there is a thread on this, please kindly point me to it.
now then, here's a higher level description of the issue i am having. using SCCM 2007 SP2. I have a package i am pushing out to some workstations in our domain. I have created an advertisement to push out the package. Here's where it gets weird. When
i look at the status of my advertisement, it's showing as failed ( exit code of 2 has returned), however when i check the clients, the application installed successfully. I have checked every log i can think of and i can't find any reason why SCCM is showing
"failed" when in fact the installation succeeded.
anyone have any ideas? I'll provide logs as requested. just let me know which logs.
Thanks for any help you can give!

also check this : http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/82e8d585-3d7e-4f56-bc74-0c04d912d87e/crm-installed-ok-but-sccm-advertisement-fail?forum=configmgrswdist
Arnav Sharma | Facebook |
Twitter Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members
reading the thread.

Distribution Point Configuration Status - Warning - Failed to retrieve the package list on the DP.

Hi,
Some of our DP's have a warning (Shown with a yellow exclamation mark) that never goes away. I have run a script on the DP's that could check for inconsistency in WMI, but it found nothing. Everything seems to work fine, but it is annoying that everything
is not green when it should be!
The warning is:
Failed to retrieve package list on the distribution point. Or the package list in content library doesn't match the one in WMI. Review smsdpmon.log for more information about this failure.

Hi Peter,
Yes I have tried to validate all content to no avail. ;(
No help to find in smsdpmon.log, I really think it is a bug...
Here is a small part of it:
]LOG]!><time="03:50:29.934-60" date="11-29-2014" component="SMS_Distribution_Point_Monitoring" context="" type="1" thread="28024" file="libsmsmessaging.cpp:10858">
<![LOG[Report status message 0x40000950 to MP]LOG]!><time="03:50:29.943-60" date="11-29-2014" component="SMS_Distribution_Point_Monitoring" context="" type="1" thread="28024" file="smsdpmon.cpp:983">
<![LOG[Status message has been successfully sent to MP from remote DP]LOG]!><time="03:50:29.969-60" date="11-29-2014" component="SMS_Distribution_Point_Monitoring" context="" type="1" thread="28024"
file="smsdpmon.cpp:1051">
<![LOG[Start to evaluate package 'C010003E' version 0 ...]LOG]!><time="03:50:29.969-60" date="11-29-2014" component="SMS_Distribution_Point_Monitoring" context="" type="1" thread="28024" file="smsdpmon.cpp:586">
<![LOG[Report status message 0x4000094C to MP]LOG]!><time="03:50:29.969-60" date="11-29-2014" component="SMS_Distribution_Point_Monitoring" context="" type="1" thread="28024" file="smsdpmon.cpp:983">
<![LOG[Status message has been successfully sent to MP from remote DP]LOG]!><time="03:50:29.996-60" date="11-29-2014" component="SMS_Distribution_Point_Monitoring" context="" type="1" thread="28024"
file="smsdpmon.cpp:1051">
<![LOG[Start to evaluate package share for package 'C010003E' version 0 ...]LOG]!><time="03:50:32.510-60" date="11-29-2014" component="SMS_Distribution_Point_Monitoring" context="" type="1" thread="28024"
file="smsdpmon.cpp:629">
<![LOG[Package C010003E is verified successfully]LOG]!><time="03:50:32.512-60" date="11-29-2014" component="SMS_Distribution_Point_Monitoring" context="" type="1" thread="28024" file="smsdpmon.cpp:649">
<![LOG[Report state message 0x40000950 to MP]LOG]!><time="03:50:32.512-60" date="11-29-2014" component="SMS_Distribution_Point_Monitoring" context="" type="1" thread="28024" file="smsdpmon.cpp:889">
<![LOG[Report Body: <ReportBody><StateMessage MessageTime="20141129025032.000000+000" SerialNumber="0"><Topic ID="C010003E" Type="901" IDType="0"/><State ID="2384" Criticality="0"/><UserParameters
Flags="0" Count="2"><Param>C010003E</Param><Param>["Display=\\dk01dc1sscm01.local.avk.dk\"]MSWNET:["SMS_SITE=C01"]\\dk01dc1sscm01.local.avk.dk\</Param></UserParameters></StateMessage></ReportBody>
]LOG]!><time="03:50:32.520-60" date="11-29-2014" component="SMS_Distribution_Point_Monitoring" context="" type="1" thread="28024" file="libsmsmessaging.cpp:10858">
<![LOG[Report status message 0x40000950 to MP]LOG]!><time="03:50:32.528-60" date="11-29-2014" component="SMS_Distribution_Point_Monitoring" context="" type="1" thread="28024" file="smsdpmon.cpp:983">
<![LOG[Status message has been successfully sent to MP from remote DP]LOG]!><time="03:50:32.557-60" date="11-29-2014" component="SMS_Distribution_Point_Monitoring" context="" type="1" thread="28024"
file="smsdpmon.cpp:1051">
<![LOG[Report status message 0x40000959 to MP]LOG]!><time="03:50:32.557-60" date="11-29-2014" component="SMS_Distribution_Point_Monitoring" context="" type="1" thread="28024" file="smsdpmon.cpp:983">
<![LOG[Status message has been successfully sent to MP from remote DP]LOG]!><time="03:50:32.582-60" date="11-29-2014" component="SMS_Distribution_Point_Monitoring" context="" type="1" thread="28024"
file="smsdpmon.cpp:1051">
<![LOG[Report status message 0x40000952 to MP]LOG]!><time="03:50:32.582-60" date="11-29-2014" component="SMS_Distribution_Point_Monitoring" context="" type="1" thread="28024" file="smsdpmon.cpp:983">
<![LOG[Status message has been successfully sent to MP from remote DP]LOG]!><time="03:50:32.607-60" date="11-29-2014" component="SMS_Distribution_Point_Monitoring" context="" type="1" thread="28024"
file="smsdpmon.cpp:1051">
<![LOG[DP monitoring finishes evaluation.]LOG]!><time="03:50:32.607-60" date="11-29-2014" component="SMS_Distribution_Point_Monitoring" context="" type="1" thread="28024" file="smsdpmon.cpp:500">

Lms reporting success status=pass/fail, where it should give unknown while running on saba 5.3

I am trying to run my content on SABA 5.3 , After exiting the content the lms displays success status as Pass or Fail where it should show Unknown. My content does not contain any quiz, so on which basis lms is calculating the success status.

Yes I know you said your content had no quiz, but please try to remember that we answer hundreds of these enquiries and it's not uncommon for people to tell us one thing when their settings say another. So I have the habit of asking to see the actual screenshot.
Each LMS interprets the SCORM standard a little differently. In SCORM 2004 a course module can have both a status for Complete or Incomplete, as well as a separate status for Pass or Fail. (Under SCORM 1.2 the overall status was tracked by a single element - cmi.core.lesson_status - allowing for only a single status value that would boil down to Complete vs Incomplete or Pass vs Fail values.
Under SCORM 2004 there are two separate elements tracking completion and success.
The SCORM 2004 element cmi.completion_status is designed to indicate whether the learner has completed the SCO and can take the following status values:
completed,
incomplete,
not attempted,
unknown
Your Pass/Fail status in SCORM 2004 falls under the element called cmi.success_status. This one indicates whether the learner has mastered the objective and can take the following values:
passed,
failed,
unknown
So while it is possible for a value of "unknown" to be set for either cmi.completion_status or cmi.success_status, I don't think this would be very commonly done for a Captivate module that actually has interaction data being sent to the LMS. If the user is interacting with the content at all it would seem more likely that you'd be getting a 'completed' or 'incomplete' status value in the completion element and a 'pass' or 'fail' value in the success_status element.
The bit I don't understand is why are you particularly keen to see a value of 'unknown' showing up here?
Check this page for information about getting SABA to work with Captivate: http://www.infosemantics.com.au/adobe-captivate-learning-managment-system-lms-guide/saba
Perhaps one of the threads it links to will provide more help for you.

Fulfillment status check failed

When I run the fulfillment status check page (or the admin/packaging pages), the HTTP server checks out OK, but I fail the check for the app server.
In the logs I get the following error message:
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationContext log
INFO: Marking servlet Status as unavailable
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve invoke
SEVERE: Allocate exception for servlet Status
Any ideas on how I can fix this issue? I thought that it might somehow be getting hung up on the "Adobe Signing Server" step, since that step gets stuck on "Connecting..." and I have been unable to get the certificate, but I opened a separate discussion for that

Not sure exactly what is causing it but I doubt that this is an SAP problem.
The error message you are getting has only the word TEST in it and the message number starts with a Z. SAP doesn't start their message numbers with Z. It is used for customer objects. This tells me that the message you are seeing is a custom one someone in your company has created and is causing to display. Chances are it is being used in a user exit as part of development. If this is in your production system, I would say you have a problem as a TEST message like that shouldn't show up. It should either be a real message with additional information or it should have been removed before moving to production.
I would have a developer run this in debug. Chances are you'll find a user exit in use that is causing this.
FF

S.M.A.R.T Status is Failing?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for