S_P00_07000079 -Orders settlement statement

Hello all,
   I need to execute the report S_P00_07000079 (orders setttlement statement) for a specified period :for eg from period 1 in fiscal year 2008 to period 3 in fiscal year 2008 .However the standard report has selection criteria only for a "Fiscal Year/Period To".Is there any workaround for this ?
Or can you suggest an alternative report with similar content ?
Regards

Narendra,
This report is based on the std report from report painter (6OA1-001), library (602). You need to copy this report and change the general selection parameters to include the year and period as selection option.
Regards
Pooja

Similar Messages

  • Open Work Order settlement - KO8G or KO88

    Hi,
    I am facing an issue with open work order settlement using KO8G or KO88.
    We are on 6.0 and PSM turned and New GL activated with a document splitting on fund mandatory flag turned on.
    When open work orders undergo WIP calculation through KKAI, it shows the the calculated amount in the GL account but when we execute KO88 or KO8G to settle this open work order amount to the GL, it gives me the below error
    GLT2201 "Balancing field "Fund" in line item 001 not filled"
    On debugging the KO88, its seen that the field fund does not flow in from the work order.
    This means that both my P&L accounts and my balance sheet accounts that offset the WIP posting does not have the fund field (which is a mandatory field for posting any document in the system).
    Has anyone come across such a situation?
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Pradeep

    Ashok,
    Thanks for the reply.
    We have a user exit to populate the order during its creation. this means the fund field is already residing on the order. so during settlement process, closed orders dont have a problem but when open orders are subject to settlement i.e WIP settlement, the cost on the order is not transferred to the GL account because of the fund missing as our financial statements should be balances by fund.
    Do you think an user exit can suffice this ? have you ever tried or come across such a scenario.
    Thanks
    Pradeep

  • Incomplete Process order settlement at Month end.

    We have issue with order settlement during the month end. We have process orders that run over the week (thus will run over the month-end), with REL, PCNF, and PDLV status at the month end. Production does not want to close/ TECO those orders, as we are not yet done. But FI wants to settle them for the month end.
    1) Can FI settle those REL work orders, as mentioned before?
    This is what I found:
    2) The standard practice is TECO, is to set before closing the order.
    3) You can only perform (business) closing for a process order if (CLSD):
    The order has status Released (REL), Control recipe created (CRCR) or Control recipe discarded (CRAB), or Technically completed (TECO). To have status Technically completed, the order must have already reached status Released.
    The order balance is 0.
    There are no more open purchase requisitions, orders, or commitments for it.
    All data related to the process order is available and correct (For example, the inspection lots for the order must be completed).
    There are no future change records from the confirmation processes
    2) So, if statement 1) is correct, is this correct lifeycle:
    A.     Settlement at month end for all orders with REL status.
    B.      TECO after settlement, and also after DLV and CNF status.
    C.      Close after TECO.
    Upload in your comments, if there is any link.
    Thanks, points will be rewarded.

    Hi Abi,
    Since the Process order is in uncompleted stage and partially delivered to stock, still it has WIP to be delivered to stock.
    Calculate the WIP value & settle the order in Month end.
    Prerequisite for WIP calculation is order should has REL status.
    In month end for Uncompleted order , calculate WIP value & settle the Order.
    General steps for month end practice:
    Over head calculation
    WIP calculation
    Variance calculation -  Once the Order receives  -  DLV /TECO  status.
    Order settlement.
    Order closing
    Regards
    Pradeep

  • Product cost by order - settlement with distribution rule

    Dear All,
         While doing the settlment, the system posts only varinance cost to the object , if we have only one receiver object. but if we have two receiver objects apportioning the variance cost 50% to each of the object (one is Mat and another is ORD category)
    . in this case , the system divides the total actual cost to each of the receiver and it posts the variance cost only to the materials. below are the example
    Material -- Mat A              and  service Order :  Serv  X
    if the variance cost is 100
    1. if the setttlment rule is -- 100% to Mat A, then it posts the variance cost 100 to Mat A
    2. if the setttlment rule is -- 100% to Serv X, then it posts the variance cost 100 to Serv  X.
    3. if the setttlment rule is - 50% to Mat A and 50% to Serv X, then it transfers the total actual cost and variance cost as below
          Mat A         600          (assuming 1000 as total cost and 100 as variance  - so takes 500 + 100)
          Serv X       -500
    Expected result (only variable cost has to be apportioned and posted like below)
         Mat A    50
         Serv X  50
    Expecting your valuable suggesstions and guideline at the earliest
    Thanks

    Hi,
    I understand that the Production Order is stats DLV as you are calculating the Variances.
    In cases where no Cost Estimate updated for the Material before the Goods Receipt, Target costs are not calculated during the variance analysis.
    This reslts in updating the entire actual cost as Variance and will be transferred to the Settlement receivers based on the Settlement Rule during the settlement.
    Regards
    Umapathi G

  • Month end producton order settlement

    Dear friends,is it really necessary to settle the production orders of a particular period.What happens if we skip the settlement for a particular period .
           Please give me an answer.

    HI,
    if you don't settle:
    1: your monthly P&L statement is wrong as the PP-order material consumption postings can be seen within P&L accounts but not the WIP that is "produced" due to this material consumption (because this is one of the postings happened during settlement).
    2: the PP-order balance will never be zero (thats the other posting that is created when settling PP-orders) which lead to wrong CO-PA results (compared to P&L statement)
    3: you are not able to do any PP-order archiving in SAP standard until order balance is not zero (the " marked for deletion" indicator cannot be set to PP-order, maybe thats no issue for the moment but after a few periods / years of pp-order creation your SAP system increases and gets slower/slower,... and then its time to archive old PP-orders...)
    So it is highly suggested to do monthly PP-order settlement,,,
    Best regards, Christian

  • Sales Order Settlement to Only WBS

    Hi,
    I have scenario like Sales Order Settlement to only WBS in make to order.
    Again from WBS settlement to COPA.
    So far I know WBS settlement to COPA and I am not sure in the 1 st scenario.
    Can you any body tell me where I need to configure, is it only settlement profile or any other settings required?
    Thanks & Regards,
    KBR

    Hi,
    What is the business rational to have a 2 step settlement to COPA?
    Thank you and Regards,
    Varshal Kachole

  • KO8G open work order settlement

    Hi,
    I am facing an issue with open work order settlement using KO8G or KO88.
    We are on 6.0 and PSM turned and New GL activated with a document splitting on fund mandatory flag turned on.
    When open work orders undergo WIP calculation through KKAI, it shows the the calculated amount in the GL account but when we execute KO88 or KO8G to settle this open work order amount to the GL, it gives me the below error
    GLT2201 "Balancing field "Fund" in line item 001 not filled"
    On debugging the KO88, its seen that the field fund does not flow in from the work order.
    This means that both my P&L accounts and my balance sheet accounts that offset the WIP posting does not have the fund field (which is a mandatory field for posting any document in the system).
    Has anyone come across such a situation?
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Pradeep
    Edited by: Pradeep Giri on May 30, 2009 4:07 AM

    Hey Vanessa,
    Sorry i have been really busy with work off late. I just got a moment and wanted to thank you for the help.
    I found a solution for it, we had FMDERIVE default the fund on the accounts used in WIP settlement as they are dedicated for those process.
    The cost is picked from the order and deposited on the P&L account which is now attached to the fund and this is further transferred to the balance sheet account with the fund information.
    Problem solved.
    Do you see any other implications on this?
    Thanks again.
    Pradeep

  • Using a different Sender GL in Internal Order Settlement

    When we settle an Internal Order from GL/Cost Element 1 to Fixed Assets, we get:
    Dr: Fixed Asset
    Cr: GL/Cost Element 1.
    For various reasons, we do not want to Credit the original GL/Cost Element but rather another one.
    Does anyone have any sugestions as to how this can be achieved?
    Thanks.

    Hi
    Can you tell me what is meant by "Internal Order from GL/Cost Element.."? 
    As per the functionality, when you settle an internal order, something is moved from the intrnal order and put to another.  Hence the place from where it is moved is credited and the receiver is debited.  The internal order has postings through the cost element you have posted.  So the movement is from what the internal order has in its account. 
    Order settlement is done through a secondary cost element created and this cost element is used for debiting and crediting the sender and receivers.  Hence your idea of using a totally different GL/Cost element (of course that do not have postings with respect fo the internal order in question) is not practical, I hope.

  • ORDER BY Statement in CALENDAR doesn't work! SOLVED

    Hello!
    I think I've searched nearly all threads containing the words 'calendar' and 'order'... I've found some threads dealing with the same problem as I do but I couldn't solve my problem yet...
    I've got a calender and the data in the day columns are displayed like this:
    time: what, e.g. 13:30: Test (13:30 would be 1:30 pm...)
    In one day column can be more then one deadline and I want them to be ordered by the time they take place - like in any other, 'normal' calender.
    But my ORDER BY Statement has no effect!
    My day column does look like this: http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/8413/calendar01vy8.jpg - very unordered!
    And this is my Code:
    (please ignore the _ in <_span>, <_b> and <_br /> - I don't want the HTML code to have an effect of the display of this post!)
    SELECT
    CASE WHEN C.EnvName = 'Production' THEN
    '<_span style = "font size: 11; color: black; background-color: coral">' || '<_b>' || TO_CHAR(B.AffectedFrom, 'HH24:MI') || ': ' ||'<_/b>'|| A.ChName || '<_br />' ||'<_/span>'
    WHEN C.EnvName = 'Development' THEN
    '<_span style = "font size: 11; color: black; background-color: cyan">' || '<_b>' || TO_CHAR(B.AffectedFrom, 'HH24:MI') || ': ' ||'<_/b>'|| A.ChName || '<_br />' || '<_/span>'
    ELSE
    '<_span style = "font size: 11; color: black; background-color: gold">' || '<_b>' || TO_CHAR(B.AffectedFrom, 'HH24:MI') || ': ' ||'<_/b>'|| A.ChName || '<_br />' || '<_/span>'
    END AS ChName, B.ActID, B.ActDate, TO_CHAR(B.AffectedFrom, 'HH24:MI') AS AffectedFrom, C.EnvName
    FROM RB_Change A, RB_Action B, RB_Environment C
    WHERE A.CHID = B.CHID AND B.EnvID = C.EnvID
    ORDER BY AffectedFrom
    My Display Type is Custom and my Display Format is #CHNAME#
    In this thread (Re: CALENDAR - SQL ORDER BY CLAUSE NOT WORKING I read I would have to insert '<INPUT TYPE="HIDDEN" VALUE="' || p_value || '" />' (in my code it would be into my code '<INPUT TYPE="HIDDEN" VALUE="' || ChName || '" />', wouldn't it?) - but where should I insert it?
    Sorry, but I'm very new to APEX, HTML and PLSQL...
    Can anyone help me please? I would be very grateful!

    Hi Dik!
    Thanks a lot for your quick answer.
    I just tried out what you said and created a view. I needed to do it with all the joined tables because the date, the time shown and the text shown are in two different tables and later I need them for daylink...
    The view is created and looks fine (with all the color I want) and the calendar works - but it hat no effect... The calendar looks just the same like before - unordered... So I undid the change with the view and now I've got the same state as before.
    I just used the 'debug'-function of APEX and realised that APEX fetches my SELECT statement and embeds it in an own SELECT statement...
    That looks like this:
    SELECT * FROM ( - here comes my SELECT statement I described in my first post - ) where ACTDATE >= to_date('20080201:00:00:00','RRRRMMDD:HH24:MI:SS') and ACTDATE <= to_date('20080229:23:59:59','RRRRMMDD:HH24:MI:SS') order by ACTDATE asc
    Has got anyone an idea how I can order my data in the way I want???

  • For internal order settlement rule amount column is requied instead %

    Hi Gurus,
    For internal order settlement rule percentage is there but business wants  to settle from AUC to final asset by amount wise how can we do this.
    I tried to change the investment profile but it is coming amount field while saving it is not displaying.
    Please help in this regard
    Thank you.
    Ranganadh

    Hi
    Check the path
    IMG>Controlling>Internal Orders>Actual Posting>Settlement>Maintain Settlement Profile>Maintain Settlement Profile.
    Here there is a tick for amount settlement under Indicators. You need to maintain this check box for your requirements.
    Regards
    Sanil Bhandari

  • Error while doing production order settlement

    Hi frds,
    When I am doing the production order settlement, I am getting the following error
    " There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible".
    The status of the order is TECO CNF DLV PRC BASC BCRQ GMPS MANC.
    Rajnish

    Rajnish,
    Please check if there is cost balance for the order, to me it looks like the order is already settled. In the order display mode (CO03) menu bar Goto->Costs->Balance.
    If balance exists then the problem may be related to the settlement period used in the Intial screen of transaction KO88. Please check the cost incured period and use the same period as settlement period.
    Regards,
    Prasobh

  • Production order settlement in case of non valuated material

    Hello guys,
        Our client wants some of the materials have to be non valuated. These materials are raw materials and SFG also. We can assign UNBW material types to those materials.
       I have created one material for test purpose. It doesn't contain the accounting view so as no valuation class. BOM of it , doesn't contain any component as client doesn't want to show any consumption on production order.While creating the order for that material system asks for the settlement rule. I skip that step and create the order. I do GR for the same.
      My question is, is production order settlement essential for these orders? What if we don't settle the order. No activity type has been assign to the work center.
      Kindly give ur valuable inputs.

    Hi,
    No need to create material as UNBW type.
    Normal ROH, HALB, FERT material type we can achieve this.
    In the BOM of FG or SFG goto  item detail screen there is a tick mark in costing.
    Remove the tick by OS23 - BOM status.
    Now you can do your production as regular. But cost will not get update.You can do regular settlement also.
    Regards,
    Dharma

  • Re: Issue while doing Order Settlement

    Hi Experts,
    I have completed the goods reciept step for a process order.
    Now I am trying to do the following steps for the order settlement.
    1.Calculate Overheads using Tcode : KGI2 - Individual Processing
    CO43 - Collective Processing
    2.Calculate WIP using Tcode : KKAX - Individual Processing
    KKAO - Collective Processing
    3.Calculate Variance by using Tcode : KKS2 - Individual Processing
    KKS1 - Collective Processing
    4.Finally do the settlement of Order in Tcode : KO88 - Individual Processing
    CO88 - Collective Processing
    I am not able to do these steps.
    KGI2: the screen is appearing  without any details,but there is no error message.
    KKS2: Here all the cost are coming zero.
    KO88: I am getting this message: There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible.
    Please advice.
    Regards,
    Vivek

    Dear,
    Message no KD256??
    You will just check for customization settings for accrual calculation ie cheak for settelement to fiin the result analysis version and check posting rules
    Maintain the config in OKG8 for RA category "RUCR".
    Check this OSS note 179533
    Also check order previously settled?
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • CCS Details are not getting updated to COPA in Sales Order Settlement(VA88)

    Dear Experts,
    Our scenario is MTO with valuated material.
    1. Production order is tagged to Sales Order.
    2. Production order is settled to Material and variance is getting posted to COPA.
    3. At the time of Delivery, COGS Debit (Cost Object- Sales Order), Credit - Inventory.
    4. At the time of Billing, Accounting Document is getting generated, COPA document is not getting generated.
    5. We  are not executing WIP. (as per Business process)
    6. Settlement is done thru transaction code VA88. COPA Document is getting generated.
    I am facing the following issues in the above MTO process.
    1. At time of sales order settlement thru VA88, In COPA, only COGS is getting as updated with one value field i.e. Material Cost.  Cost Component data (Material Depreciation, Labor etc..) is not getting updated to COPA.
    2. When I settle the Sales Order thru VA88, Billing Quantity is not getting updated to COPA though Quantity field mapping is done properly.
    Please help me how to resolve the above issues.
    Note: Same Cost Component Structure, we are using for Make to Stock scenario. Cost Component Data is getting updated Properly to COPA  (at the time of Billing)
    Regards,
    vgl
    Edited by: vglokam on Aug 31, 2010 10:52 AM
    Edited by: vglokam on Aug 31, 2010 10:54 AM

    Hi
    1. CCS (Cost Comp Split) wont be updated to COPA if you settle via sale order.. In sale order, COGS cost element is posted.. the same will get settled to COPA as one single value...
    In MTS, the CCS gets updated to COPA upon billing because of the "valuation" strategy customization... Billing posts to COPA in that case, COPA gets Sales Qty and it is valuated with CCS to give you the break up.. But, in your case, Billing is not posting to COPA, but to sales order.. hence, there is no qty flow into COPA upon billing.. thats why you dont get CCS for MTO
    2. The sales qty should be updated to COPA upon VA88.. For this, make the following settings in your PA transfer structure which is used during VA88
    1. Go to KEI1, Select your PA transfer structure...
    2. Add an assignment line in it... Check on "Qty Billed/Delivered" in the assignment line
    3. In the Tab "Value Field" below "source", assign Qty Field
    Now when you settle, it should update qty as well
    regards
    Ajay M

  • PM Order settlements - Difference between the amounts settled

    Hi All,
    This is regarding the PM Order settlements.
    Every month end finance team run KO8G and settle the PM Order costs for that period (month). In the process the Orders are settled using a variant, which captures all the orders that has changed/created during the focused period.
    But in the report S_ALR_87013015 - List: Actual Debit/Credit there are balances for previous settlements and thereu2019s a difference between the amount settled and the debit/credit amounts.
    When drilling gown we found that this is due to following reasons,
    1.     Some orders are not settled fully.
    2.     Equipments issued against a Order are returned after the settlement process
    Ex: one Order has settled in Oct 2008 initially and fully in Jan 2009. However one material has been returned to stores in February 2009. Therefore a difference (cost of the material) between total actual cost (Dr Amount) and settled amount has been arisen.
    The Orders of nature 1 will be captured and settled in the subsequent run of KO8G.
    But my question is how can we address the orders of nature 2? Changing the settlement variant is one option.
    Also appreciate if someone can explain the SAP-best practice of PM-Order settlements.
    Thanks,
    Thushantha.

    Hi Thushantha,
    After returning the material to store check the actual cost of maintenance order. Once you fully settle the order means it becomes zero.
    When you will return material to warehouse against maintenance order once again carry out settlement of maintenanc order then check for your nature 2.
    Sundar

Maybe you are looking for