S750s - can't handle high volume :(

Hi,
I've had this problem for ages now, but have been too busy with work to do anything about it, but now that I've moved into my new house, I am aching to blow the roof off (metaphorically speaking)
The problem? Crank the volume on the s750s anywhere over 5 bars (Audigy 4 pro volume at 80%) the sound jerks and skips at the bass notes. Any higher and it cant even handle the trebble.
This is well annoying, I've disconnected everything, reconnected it all, done anything and everything sensible driver-wise. Reading some of the other posts about the s750s makes me think the issue is with the sub...
First off, anyone else out there with this kind of problem? Secondly, what can I do about it apart from getting a new set?
Cheerz

Um, maybe you have a small room? You're telling the guy he shouldn't go over that number, then why did Creative allow the volume to go that high if it can't handle it's Maybe his room is bigger OR, I go to about 5 sometimes while playing games and when it gets louder, it starts feeling more immersive. I play guitar and I like to jam with songs and I can tell you right now, I have reached the bar 7 before. My guitar amp is only on it's half setting to match volume with the speakers. If the speaker system can't handle it, they shouldn't allow it to go up that high. The S750's have been a waste of my money anyway.

Similar Messages

Junk Mail filter can't handle high volume

I use Mail.app at work/school. Unfortunately, my email address there is [email protected], and because it's so simple spammers have taken to sending spam that looks like it came from me. So every day I get dozens to hundreds of bounces from their spam, and my school's spam filter only catches about a quarter of them.
Here's my problem: 75% of the time, Mail catches all the spam bounces and puts them in my junk mail folder like it's supposed to. But if I get a whole lot at once - usually the first time I Get Mail for the day - it screws up and dumps them in the inbox. They're marked as Junk, but I still have to go through and delete them. The other day, I checked my mail and got over 200 messages in my inbox, only a handful of which were not spam!
If only a few - say, less than 20 - spams come at once, it works fine. But more than that and I have to delete them from my inbox. Anyone know how to fix this? I've played around with the JM filter settings.
(And if anyone knows how to make the spammers stop faking my address, that would be great, but I'm not hopeful.)

No, those folders could only be a problem if they existed and you had something installed there.
I’m not positive you’ll be able to find a satisfactory solution to this problem because, as I said in my first post, it’s not uncommon for Mail to choke on those bounces and the user not even being able to delete them by normal means, but you may try the following in case there is something amiss here.
Verify/repair the startup disk (not just permissions), as described here:
The Repair functions of Disk Utility: what's it all about?
After having fixed all the filesystem issues, if any, and ensuring that there’s enough space available on the startup disk (a few GB, plus the space needed to make a backup copy of the Mail folder), try this:
1. Quit Mail if it’s running.
2. In the Finder, go to ~/Library/Mail/. Make a backup copy of this folder, just in case something goes wrong, e.g. by dragging it to the Desktop while holding the Option (Alt) key down. This is where all your mail is locally stored.
3. Locate Envelope Index and move it to the Trash. If you see any other “Envelope Index”-named file there, delete it as well.
4. Move any “IMAP-”, “Mac-”, or “Exchange-” account folders to the Trash. Note that you can do this with IMAP-type accounts because they store mail on the server and Mail can easily re-create them. DON’T trash any “POP-” account folders, as that would cause all the mail stored there to be lost.
5. Open Mail. It will tell you that your mail needs to be “imported”. Click Continue and Mail will proceed to re-create Envelope Index — Mail says it’s “importing”, but it just re-creates the index if the mailboxes are already in Mail 2.x format.
6. As a side effect of having removed the IMAP account folders, those accounts may be in an “offline” state now. Do Mailbox > Go Online to bring them back online.
Note: For those not familiarized with the ~/ notation, it refers to the user’s home folder. That is, ~/Library is the Library folder within the user’s home folder, i.e. /Users/username/Library.

Can't handle high bitrates??

Hey all. I've noticed that when I play songs that are 192kbps or 320kbps or higher bitrate, that the music tends to sound distorted a little. It's not very bad but it does get irritating sometimes. Is it just me or does it seem that the nano can't handle high bit rates?
I have a Creative ZEN 8GB and I do not seem to hear the same distortion that I did with the nano. Hope someone can help. Oh btw, I did test the same type of songs using the same headphones.

I notice this problem when I listen to songs such as Chris Brown - Forever, Rihanna - Don't Stop The Music and a few more I can't remember. So pls help! Thanks!

My iPod can not play high volume and has crackling a scratchy noise in the background. hardware problem?

my iPod can not play high volume and has crackling a scratchy noise in the background. hardware problem?

It is a hardware issue e.g. bad contact between the earphone jack the earphone plug
Consider setting up a mail-in repair for your iPod http://depot.info.apple.com/ipod/
Or visit your local Apple Retail Store http://www.apple.com/retail/
In case your iPod is no longer covered by the warranty and you want to find a second repairing company, you can try iPodResQ or ifixit at your own risk
http://www.ipodresq.com/index.php
http://www.ifixit.com/

Mail program can't handle my volume of mail, need other program

Hi,
have many diff accounts that i view individually
have many subfolders which I move mail to regularly
in box avg; total - 75, per account - 20
Mail still glitches and I can't actually see most e's once moved unless i do a spotlight serch
Seeking sugestions for other program out there that might be able to handle my volume

Hi Katskratch,
I agree with Allan that Mail should be able to handle this. Your problems could probably be fixed by re-creating the index, as he has pointed out.
If you want to switch to another mail client regardless, it seems to me that you’re asking in the wrong forum. Not sure what kind of advice do you expect to find here. If we preferred another mail client, we probably wouldn’t be reading this in the first place.
Until you find a mail client that better suits your needs, I suggest you to proceed as follows to fix the problems you appear to have in Mail.
Verify/repair the startup disk (not just permissions), as described here:
The Repair functions of Disk Utility: what's it all about?
After having fixed all the filesystem issues, if any, and making sure that there’s enough space available on the startup disk (a few GB, plus the space needed to make a backup copy of the Mail folder), try this:
1. Quit Mail if it’s running.
2. In the Finder, go to ~/Library/Mail/. Make a backup copy of this folder, just in case something goes wrong, e.g. by dragging it to the Desktop while holding the Option (Alt) key down. This is where all your mail is locally stored.
3. Locate Envelope Index and move it to the Trash. If you see an Envelope Index-journal file there, delete it as well.
4. Move any “IMAP-”, “Mac-”, or “Exchange-” account folders to the Trash. Note that you can do this with IMAP-type accounts because they store mail on the server and Mail can easily re-create them. DON’T trash any “POP-” account folders, as that would cause all mail stored there to be lost.
5. Open Mail. It will tell you that your mail needs to be “imported”. Click Continue and Mail will proceed to re-create Envelope Index — Mail says it’s “importing”, but it just re-creates the index if the mailboxes are already in Mail 2.x format.
6. As a side effect of having removed the IMAP account folders, those accounts may be in an “offline” state now. Do Mailbox > Go Online to bring them back online.
Note: For those not familiarized with the ~/ notation, it refers to the user’s home folder, i.e. ~/Library is the Library folder within the user’s home folder.

Enterprise Data Quality - stuck/crash when processing high volume

I am using Enterprise Data Quality, trying to run a data profiling process of 1 million rows. However, the process (which contains group and merge processors) appears to be always stuck half way through or crashes. I have tried other data sources and the result is the same.
It seems that Enterprise Data Quality does not handle high volume very well. Please assist and let me know what other details you require.

Hi,
It is certainly not the case that EDQ does not handle large volumes of data well. We have a large number of customers running huge data volumes in the product and have benchmarked the product running services on massive volumes, including matching of 250m records.
However, if you want to run large jobs, you need to make sure the system is installed and tuned correctly. How did you install the product? Are you running 32-bit or 64-bit? How much memory is allocated to EDQ?
With regard to best practice, did you throw all profiling processors at all of your data? The better approach is to 'open profile' a sample of records and pick more carefully which processors to run on larger volumes... otherwise you are telling the server to do a huge amount of work and some of it may not be necessary. Data profiling is an iterative exercise to help you find data issues that you can check for an fix using audit and transformation processors. Profilers are used mostly for simple reporting when it comes to production jobs on larger volumes.
Note that there are some profiling processors that will cause progress reporting to appear to 'pause' at 50% of the way through a process. These are 2-phase processors such as the Record Duplication Profiler which needs to spool all data to a table and then analyze it rather than work record by record. Such processors are typically slower than the simpler profilers that add flags to the data with a counting phase at the end (Frequency Profiler, Patterns Profiler etc.)
Regards,
Mike

HT6154 HI , I am still under cotract with my iphone 5 and i can't hear anything even though i have my phone set to high volume

i am using iphone 5 and still under contract with ATT services. the phone has suddenly some technical issue. when i call some one or some one calls me, if i i turn on th emusic anything that hass to do with listening to the device, it doesnot work
i hear very very low voice eventhough it is set to high volume. will ATT will provide me free support for the phone?

Only ATT can answer that.

How to handle very high volume msgs in XI

I have a scenario where 6 million msgs/ hour(xml) have to be picked form source and to be sent to target ,
How do we handle this high volume of data is there any good practice
Pls suggest .

Hi Anubhav,
if you just have to send source file to target system without doing any mapping, then it dont use XI for it.......because you have a very high volume of msgs and for this such load, XI will start putting your msgs in wait status and may be the JAVA engine may go down because of insufficient memory.......
So better have an FTP utility in target system.....connect to source system by this...and move the files from source to target by this FTP utility......
But if you have to do a mapping from source msg to target msg, then use XI....but try doing the mapping by graphical mapping and dont go for ABAP mapping to reduce memory usage for your scenario.......
Thanks,
Rajeev Gupta

I have just purchased my Iphone 4s, and the volume of the sound is very low, I can hardly hear the other person. I have tried the button for higher volume, but there is no change

I have just purcahsed my Iphone 4s, and the volume is very low, I can hardly hear the other person talk. I have tried the botton for higher volume, but it doesn`t work. Can anybody give me an answer to what is wrong?

Did u take out the screen protection?

Tool to export and import high volume data from/to Oracle and MS Excel

We are using certain reports (developed in XLS and CSV) to extract more than 500K to 1M records in single report. There around 1000 reports generated daily. The business users review those reports and apply certain rules to identify exceptions then they apply those corrections back to the system through XL upload.
The XL reports are developed in TIBCO BW and deployed in AMX platform. The user interface is running on TIBCO GI.
Database Version: Oracle 11.2.0.3.0 (RAC - 2 node)
The inputs around following points will be of great help:
1) Recommendation to handle such higher volumes reports and mechanism to apply bulk correction back to system?
2) Suggestions for any Oracle tool or third party tool

If you were to install Oracle client software on the PC where EXCEL is installed,
then you can utilize ODBC such that Excel can connect directly to the DB & issue SQL.

Sender RFC adapter High volume messaging

Hi,
This question is related to this thread:RFC connection problem
ERP system is sending through 1 RFC dest. (program ID) 20 requests in a minute. And PI starts to hang. ERP is not able tp sent the messages and after a while the request sent from ERP starts to get cancelled. This is a synchonous scenario. How can I handle such a high volume through 1 sender RFC adapter?

Hello
You can monitor the load on RFC adapter queues/threadsin the RWB
-> Component Monitoring
-> Adatper Engine XIP
-> Engine Status
-> Additional Data
See note #791655 Documentation of the XI Messaging System Service Properties, for an explaination of the queues.
To increase the number of threads/queues, see the blog:
1) /people/kenny.scott/blog/2007/08/20/messaging-system-queue-properties-after-xi-30-sp19-xi-70sp11
2) /people/kenny.scott/blog/2008/12/05/xipi-file-and-jdbc-receiver-adapter-performance-and-availability-improvements - this shows how to prevent a problem on one RFC channel blocking other RFC channels that you may be using.
Also, ensure note #937159 XI Adapter Engine is stuck, has been applied to help overall system performance.
Regards
Mark

High volumes on receiver JDBC adapter

Hi,
We have a RFC ->JDBC scenario where the RFC pulls huge amounts of data from R/3 and sends to XI.
XI needs to upload this data into 5 different Db tables.Each table contains 3000-8000 records with each record containing 10-15 fields.
When we try to run this scenario, due to high volumes of data the JBDC adapter hangs and msgs were in 'holding/delivering' status for long time.
Please advice on possibilities of handling this within XI.

Hi,
We changed the design and now we have only 'INSERT' and we don't have concerns with table refresh now.
I am splitting the records in XI mapping as bunches on 1000 each. But I found one of the tables have more that 1lakh records.
The data volume that we received in RFC is 150000 records(45MB). It took 7.5 mins to process this msg in Integration Engine.
But the messages delivery into Db tables (receiver JDBC adapter processing) is very slow.At maximum it can process 250 records in minute.
Please provide your inputs on this design. Is it Ok to accept 45MB message into XI at one shot? Even though the message got processed(splitted) in IE, they are processing in AE for long time. I believe this will have impact on other interfaces that use JDBC adapter.
Please provide your suggestions on how to improve the design/performance of this interface.
Thanks!

AE hooked to stereo - very high volume! adjustable?

I have been using an Airport Express plugged with analog headphone plug into a fairly high-end Yamaha RX-V2500 receiver. Works great.
I just bought a 2nd Airport Express and plugged it into a much smaller, far lower end Tivoli Radio Works system. I had my iPod's dock plugged into the aux input and was using that fine. I replaced the iPod with the AE and notice that the AE-output sound is extremely high volume. I set the Tivoli's volume to maybe 3-4% and it's as loud as I'd ever listen to it normally.
Not sure why I didn't notice this on the Yamaha - perhaps it scales down the input? Is there a way to get the AE to "quiet down" on the Tivoli? Some AE setting? Thanks.
Is it damaging to plug the AE to analog line in on a stereo, given the volume?
blakespot

For the AX, the analog audio is handled by a Texas Instruments PCM2705 digital-to-analog converter which it outputs on a 3.5mm stereo minijack. It has a maximum output level of 1.53V, which is 2.3dB lower than a CD standard's 2V. The output impedance is around 15 ohms across the audioband.
It appears that the audio input port's impedance, between your Yamaha and Tivoli, are different and why you are hearing a significant difference in volumes. The signal from the AX is not amplified, and thus, why it would require either powered speakers or a LINE in for play back.
The AX gets is audio source, by default, from iTunes. You can adjust the output level from there.

Oracle database integration with SAP PI for high volume & Complex Structure

Hi
We have requirement for integrating oracle database to SAP PI 7.0 for sending data which is eventually transferred to multiple receivers. The involved data structure is hugely complex (around 18 child tables) with high volume processing requirement (100K+ objects need to be processed in 6-7 hours). We need to implement logic for prioritizing the object i.e. high priority objects must be processed first and then objects with normal priority.
We could think of implementing this kind of logic in database procedures (at least it provides flexibility for implementing data selection logic as well as processed data can be marked as success in the same SP) but since PI sender adapter doesn't support calling Oracle stored procedures currently so this option is rules out. we can try implementing complex data selection using oracle table function but table function doesn't allow any SQL query which changes data (UPDATE, INSERT, DELETE etc) so it is impossible to mark selected objects in table function from PI communication channel "Update Query" option.
Also, we need to make sure that we are not processing all the objects at once as message size for 20 objects can vary from 100 KB to 15 MB which could really lead to serious performance issues for bigger messages.
Please share any implementation experience for handling issues:
1 - Database Integration involving Oracle at sender side
2 - Complex Data structures
3 - High Volume Processing
4 - Controlled data selection from database to contro the message size in PI
Thanks,
Panchdev

Hi,
We can call the stored procedure using receiver adapter using ccBPM, we can follow different approaches for reading the data in this case.
a) In this a ccBPM instance needs to be triggered using some dummy message, after receiving this message the ccBPM can make a sync call to the Oracle database the store procedure(this can be done using the specific receiver data type strucure), on getting the response message the ccBPM can then proceed with the further steps.The stored procedure needs to be optimized for improving the performance as the mapping complexity will largely get affected by the structure in which the stored procedure returns the message.Prioritization of the objects can be handled in the stored procedure.
b) In this a ccBPM instance can first read data from the header level table, then it can make subsequent sync calls to Oracle tables for reading data from the child tables.This approach is less suitable for this interface as the number child tables is big.
Pravesh.

High volume Printing for GLM?

I understand from various sources GLM can support high volume label output provided the correct enhancements and support packs are installed and configured. This may include updates to WWI. We are currently running ECC6 EHP5, SAP_BASIS 10, EHSM 3, WWI 2.7
I would like to get this communities inputs. Our requirement is to generate >2000 identical labels via GLM. WWI processing today is long (5+min) and the output is large. Ideally system would generate 1 label with indication to print 2000 times. Our labels include barcodes and symbols and can be complex.

Dear Richard,
The functions of GLM is well explained as Christopher said and using GLM, you can print labels more than 10000 witha sequential data output. To support such large quanitity of data to be printed on labels, you may need a special printers like the Zebra High volume printer. The WWI server is equipped to print large volume of labels using specific printer plugins.
High volume printers can be used to print print requests with print files that are too large or that contain more than 32,768 labels to be printed. The HVP is designed as a printer driver for Microsoft Windows and is connected to the label printer via a plug-in.
With the HVP, only one page with all static data is sent to the printer. The HVP then receives all of the sequential data via an interface and automatically supplements the sequential data in the printout. The HVP also integrates changing bar codes or texts in the printout.
The Zebra 170Xi4 is one of most popular, industrial-strength printers on the market. This rugged metal unit prints 1-color labels up to 6.6" wide, with 300 dpi print resolution in thermal or thermal transfer mode. Its extra processing power equates to speeds up to 12 inches-per-second. This one is perfect for tough applications including compliance labels, product labels, and shipping labels.
For further information, please check the links below
EHS - Continuous Improvement for Global Label Management - Logistics - SAP Library
OSS notes in Global Label management
New changes for GLM in EHP7.0 and ERP 6.0
Dhinesh

S750s - can't handle high volume :(

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for