Sales Document initial load Authorization check.

Hi Guys,
I am trying to do an initial download of all the Sales Documents from R/3 to CRM but I get the error "An authorization check could not be executed".
SU53 is not showing any authorization failure for the corresponding user.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Siva.

Hi Siva,
As SU53 is not showing you anything, means there could be problem with rights of RFC user.
Check if your RFC user have all the required rights.
Best Regards,
Pratik Patel
Reward with points if it is of any help to you!

Similar Messages

Sales Document Delta Load Error - Status procedure could not be set

Hello,
I am getting the following error message during the sales document delta loads. It errors out in SMQ2 with this message - "Error in Validation (Details: transaction SMW01)"
In SMW01, I get this message:
The status procedure CRMORD_I could not be set from item category XXX.
Message no. CRM_ORDERADM_I503
Diagnosis
Possible causes are:
1. The system administrator has not assigned the status profile CRMORD_I to the object type.
2. Initial statuses that should be set in the status profile CRMORD_I cannot be set at present.
3. The current user RFCUSER does not have the authorization to set application statuses.
Detailed error messages can be found in the following error log for status management.
System response
The status profile is not set in the document.
Procedure
Set the status profile in Customizing so that these cases do not occur.
This status profile has been assigned to the item category mentioned and the RFCUSER has full authorization (SAP_ALL)
Do any of you know what else could be the problem here?
Thanks,
MAX

Dear All,
I met similar error before, it happens when you change the item category in ECC but there is a status profile assigned to the item
category in CRM with an active status set.
In CRM, when the item category is changed, the system can only change (or delete) the status profile if there is no user status set for this item. So for example, if there is already a status set for an item (Say, E0001 'Open' is active) in CRM, so a change of the user status profile is impossible. If you need to change the item type, then you have to make sure that there is no active user status in the item.
Please see note [1113116] point 2. This is a restriction in CRM. If you try to make the same changes directly in CRM you will also get the same error.
It is not allowed to change the item category if the document has been saved and the status profile of the new item category is different from the old one.
That is the reason why the error occurs when the data reaches CRM frm ECC.
In order to prevent that there are sysfails in the inbound queue you can implement note [1438966] - after this is implemented you will not have the queues failing but you will get the error message in the sales order in CRM.
You should ensure that the configuration for alternative item categories is R/3 is the same as in CRM and in this case all the alternative item categories should have no status profile or all the same status profile configured.
I hope this could be helpful.
Best regards,
Maggie

Agentry Sales Manager Initial Load problem

Hello,
We've implemented the Agentry Sales Manager solution, everything work well in the development and test environments, but in production we have performance issues for specific users:
We have a user with:
5900 Accounts
21900 Contact Persons
Which are very large numbers, but the person responsible for our OSS question says this is feasible in the agentry environment.
The problem occurs when we perform the initial load/transmit for this user, the Accounts are processed like it should, but during the process of the contact persons something goes wrong:
I see that the function module /SYCLO/CRMMD_DOMYCONTACT_GET is being started and completely processed (Initially we had a dump with a timeout, but this has been solved).
Then the Agentry server is processing the results of that function module:
In the log I notice these lines:
getDocumentLinks::begin
getDocumentLinks::getDocumentLinks
Afterwards the server processes the results via the steplets, after which the data is being processed on the device (iPad). Then the employeeFetch should be triggered.
In our test with a user with lesser data this happens, but in this case we notice the following:
2015/04/16 15:46:48.852:           + BackEnd=Java-1
2015/04/16 15:46:48.852:             + BackEnd=Java-1
2015/04/16 15:46:48.852:               com.syclo.sap.FetchSession::endFetchRemoval::::begin
2015/04/16 15:46:48.852:             + BackEnd=Java-1
2015/04/16 15:46:48.852:               com.syclo.sap.FetchSession::endFetchRemoval::::--------------------------------
2015/04/16 15:46:48.852:           + BackEnd=Java-1
2015/04/16 15:46:48.852:             + BackEnd=Java-1
2015/04/16 15:46:48.852:               com.syclo.sap.FetchSession::beginFetchObjectRead::::begin
2015/04/16 15:46:48.852:             + BackEnd=Java-1
2015/04/16 15:46:48.852:               com.syclo.sap.FetchSession::beginFetchObjectRead::::--------------------------------
2015/04/16 15:46:48.852:           + BackEnd=Java-1
2015/04/16 15:46:48.852:             + BackEnd=Java-1
2015/04/16 15:46:48.852:               com.syclo.sap.FetchSession::endFetchObjectRead::::begin
2015/04/16 15:46:48.852:             + BackEnd=Java-1
2015/04/16 15:46:48.852:               com.syclo.sap.FetchSession::endFetchObjectRead::::--------------------------------
2015/04/16 15:49:21.108: + Thread=4172
2015/04/16 15:49:21.108:   + Server=Agentry
2015/04/16 15:49:21.108:     + BackEnd=Java-1
2015/04/16 15:49:21.108:       Java Back End: current jvm memory usage is 1682243584 bytes
2015/04/16 15:49:38.096:   + Server=Agentry
2015/04/16 15:49:38.096:     + BackEnd=Java-1
2015/04/16 15:49:38.096:       Java Back End: current jvm memory usage is 1682309120 bytes
2015/04/16 15:49:55.100:   + Server=Agentry
2015/04/16 15:49:55.100:     + BackEnd=Java-1
2015/04/16 15:49:55.100:       Java Back End: current jvm memory usage is 1682374656 bytes
After the last line nothing else happens.
In the Agentry GUI I see also that the Connection has disappeared without an error/exception what so ever...
Anybody has an idea what might cause this issue?
We've set the timeout and keepalive parameters to 36000 seconds (10 hours) in the agentry ini, so I think that it isn't a time out.
Thanks in advance!
Kind regards,
Robin

Hi Jason,
Thanks for your answer, it is a standalone Agentry server (without SMP). It looks to me also that the amount of data being fetched is too big. But the customer wants to get it on the device as the person on OSS said it should be possible.
When I look in the AgentryGUI on the server during the fetch I notice the following (see screenshot below):
The fetch is still busy but the connection is gone. At the point of the screenshot we see the Fetch is taking more then 3 hours (9:27 AM to 12:51 PM), but the connection for that user has been gone in the AgentryGUI from around 11:00 AM.
Even stranger is that nowhere an exception is thrown. The process on the server continues until the complete data set is processed in the steplets (seen in the log). Then the server is trying to allocate more jvm heap space. But at some point process just stops. In stead of continuing with the process.
The data is also not sent to the device at that point, so the problem is somewhere on the agentry server it seems.
The server's memory is 8GB and i'v set the maxheapspace variable in the agentry.ini as following:
maxHeapSize=2048
In the log I see that the server that cap doesn't reach.
We run on an iPad, only iOS devices were in scope.
Any idea's on where we might change something else?
Kind regards,
Robin

Sales document types during initial load

Hi Gurus,
Landscape - SAP R/3 4.6 c, CRM - 4.0
We are starting the initial load for the Sales documents, item categories etc.
For the same, for the document types in R/3, we have the same document type in CRM.
Question 1- Do I need to configure the partner determination, incompletion log etc for the document type before the initial load or I can do it later once the data is in CRM.
Question 2- Is it mandatory that for all the doc types in R/3, we have the respective document type in CRM? Logically yes, if yes, where can I find the mapping? For example for OR in R/3, there is a TA in CRM.
Request someone to answer this ASAP.
thanks
Yash

Hi Yash,
I think the behavior is just use the same code
of Transaction Type in CRM and Order Type in R/3.
Since partner determiniation using different partner
function codes in CRM and R/3, maintained or not in R/3,
you may still need to maintain it again in CRM.
For document, what you can do just create same document
type (Transaction type) for R/3 and CRM. And depends upon
you sceneario (in CRM there are several scenarios such as
document created in CRM and transfered to R/3 Or download
R/3 document into CRM - no transaction in CRM).
Especially for partner, you may need to setup data
transfer CRM to R/3 or R/3 to CRM in CRM configuration.
And in R/3 you need to define it in tcode PIDE.
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
Gun.

No initial load of Customers, Material and delta load of Sales Orders.

Hi Experts,
I am facing a very troublesome issue. I am not able to setup the Middleware portion for initial and delta loads. I read a lot of documents and corrected a lot of things. finally, the connectivity is done with R/3 and CRM. Initial load of all objects is successful (as per Best PRactices guide). Customizing load is successful.
But after now I have these open issues for which I am unable to find any answers (am really exhausted!!):
- Customer_main load, it was succesful, but no BP's of R/3 are available.
- Material, it failed in SMW01, SMQ2, the errors are:
Mat. for Initial Download: Function table not supported
EAN xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx does not correspond to the GTIN format and cannot be transferred
EAN yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy does not correspond to the GTIN format and cannot be transferred
Plant xx is not assigned to a business partner
- Sales order, it shows green bdoc, but error segments says "No upload to R/3" and the order does not flow to R/3.
We had our system setup 3 years back for data transfer and Middleware. But few things changed and connectivity stopped. I did all that again now, but am not yet successful. Any inputs will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
-Pat

Hi Ashvin,
The error messages in SMW01 for MAterial initial load is :
     Mat. for Initial Download: Function table not supported
     EAN 123456789000562 does not correspond to the GTIN format and cannot be transferred
     EAN 900033056531434 does not correspond to the GTIN format and cannot be transferred
     Plant 21 is not assigned to a business partner
I have done the DNL_PLANT load successfully. Why then the plant error?
Some of the messages for BP:
Messages for business partner 1331:
No classification is assigned to business partner 1331
For another,
     Partner 00001872(469206A60E5F61C6E10000009F70045E): the following errors occurred
     City Atlanta does not exist in country US
     Time zone EST_NA does not exist
     You are not allowed to enter a tax jurisdiction code for country US
     Validation error occurred: Module CRM_BUPA_MAIN_VAL, BDoc type BUPA_MAIN.
Now, the time zone EST is assigned by default in R/3. Where do I change that? I do not want to change time zones as this may have other impacts. Maybe CRM I cna change this, not for sure in R/3. City check has been deactivated in R/3 and CRM, still the error.
Till these 2 are not solved, I cannot go into the Sales order loads.
Any ideas will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
-Pat

Checking the first radio box in a dataTable on initial load

Hi,
I have a datatable bound to a UIData object in a backing bean. The data table has a radio check box widget which I use to select a data row. I would like to have the first checkbox checked on an initial load, I tried using EL to no avail.....
Any suggestions or syntax advice is appreciated. Here is my JSF tag inside the data table.... note, friends is a reference to a session variable containing the UIData elements.
<h-bud:column id="budSelected">
 <f-bud:facet name="header">
 <f-bud:verbatim>�</f-bud:verbatim>
 </f-bud:facet>
 <h-bud:selectOneRadio id="budSelectedValue" value="#{ (friends.data.rowIndex eq 0) ? 1 : 0 }" valueChangeListener="#{friends.doOnSelectRadio}" onclick="selectOne(this.document, this);" immediate="true"><f-bud:selectItem itemValue="#{friendsList.friend.id}" /></h-bud:selectOneRadio>
 <f-bud:facet name="footer">
 <h-bud:column id="budEmpty">
 <f-bud:verbatim>�</f-bud:verbatim>
 </h-bud:column>
 </f-bud:facet>
 </h-bud:column>Cheers
Colm

Hi Meghasyam
Thanks for the reply, I am setting the value of <f-bud:selectItem itemValue="#{friendsList.friend.id}" /> to the value of my "Friends" primary key ID, so I know which user was selected when the form is submitted?
If im correct in understanding you, you are saying that this value must alway be 1. If this is the case, where can I tag a value to the radio box associating it with an ID?
I need to use a radio button UI widget as a checkbox is associated with multiple selections which is not allowed on my form, I need to only allow one selection of the table row per display.
Cheers
COlm

Insufficient authorization for sales document

Insufficient authorization for sales document
We are getting an error message as insufficient authorization in spite Sales Order fully approved. We are using Credit Card Processing without clearing house as payment process on sales order processing. Sales Order is process correctly with credit card pre-authorization.
Creating delivery and billing document is giving an error as Insufficient authorization.
We have completed configuration related to payment card. Also Maintain Clearing House...
Chart of Accounts              ***
Payment card receivables       ####        CASH CLR-CREDIT CARD
Clearing account               ####        CASH - PNC
Authorization                            CCARD_AUTH_SIMULATION
Initialization Authorization SET
Result Authorization (SET)               SD_CCARD_AUTH_CALL_RFC
RFC destinations of functions
Settlement                               CCARD_SETTLEMENT_SIMULATION
RFC destination of functions
Settlement answer                        CCARD_SETTLEMENT_RSP_EXECUTE
Thanks
PP

Yadav,
The new documents are working fine. The documents already created when try to release billing to accounting getting
message..Insufficient authorization for sales document 90000055
Message no. V/032
Procedure
Check the authorization amounts in the payment card plan and repeat authorization. Or reauthorize at a later time.
Thanks
PP

Authorization for My Own Sales Document

Hi Gurus,
we intend to restrict reporting so that it is limited to my own sales document.
business wise, we need this functionality to keep whole organization pipeline info confidential to the sales staff as it's related to account management.
whenever a sales document has a partner function person responsible maintained with my employee number, i will be authorized to generate the BIW report. on the other hand, if the person responsible in the sales document is other sales person, i will not be authorized to generate the report.
is there any authorization object to control this kind of restriction?
as we have lots of sales staff, we also avoid creating one job role for each sales staff.
any lead is really appreciated.
Regards,
JD

Hi JD,
Yes you need to create and authorization object in RSSM and select for which all the info providers you want to use the Auth obj.
Ex: i want to restrict my reporting users to the sales doc, and comp code.
1.Check the auth relevent for these info objects in Bex tab
2.Create auth objects for sales doc and comp code
3. check the info providers you want to restrict.
4. Create a role for Sales doc, in the change profile select the value for sales doc which i want to restrict to the user. ex :1001
5 Create a role for comp code,in the change profile select the value for comp code which i want to restrict to the user. ex :ABC.
6. Generate the auth object.
7. Check in RSSM for auth obj, for a given user.
8. check the values according to the roles assigned by you.
9.Generate the Auth obj.
10.go to rssmq -- > give the user -> select the query & run-> check for the desired results -- > come back F3 ---> check the log for the Auth objects hitting.
Cheer's
HVR.

REMOVED " V/032 Insufficient authorization for sales document"

We are having serious issues with the multiple credit card authorization at the time of releasing the billing document to accounting. Everything is with fine with a single payment card. But as soon we split the order value into two payment card and try to release it to accounting, It gives me this error " Insufficient authorization for sales document XXXX". It was working fine sometime back in July and i had tested it many times, i have no clue what happened in the system or what triggered it. I have checked all the config and settings, everything is fine, and i am unable to understand what is causing this issue. Any help from anywhere would be greatly appreciated....
thanks all in advance for their input..
Message was edited by:
Yathish K

Hi,
Please read rules of engagement before posting.
Step 1: Finding An Answer
Rule number one: Try to find the answer first. There are tons of resources out there, show that you have tried to find the answer. A question that shows that the person is willing to try and help themselves is more likely to be answered than one which simply demands information. Tell us what you have done to try and solve the problem yourself - often we can learn from that too!
Search the forums, the articles, the blog posts and the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) in the Wiki for your topic.
Step 2: Asking Your Question
Once you have verified that no resources are available for solving your problem, ask your question. Do the following:
- Use a Good Subject Line
The subject header is your golden opportunity to attract qualified experts' attention in around 50 characters or less. Don't waste it on babble like "Workflow question". We all have busy jobs, often we just skim through the list headings and read those that interest us. Also, DO NOT reply to an unrelated post to ask a different question. This confuses those reading the thread and may lose people that would be interested in your question. Always start a new topic with a new mail.
Bad subject: Urgent problem with workflow
Good subject: Error after transport: "Inconsistent workflow definition"
Do not use words in capital letters and any of the words: urgent, quickly, burning, etc in your message. Especially not in the title! This just irritates and does not help you get to your goal. From our side, we definitely do not answer faster when we see these words.
The same goes for such things as ??? or !!! in appends. In the English language one ? or ! is sufficient to terminate a sentence.

Insufficent authorization for sales document 2321.....

hi gurus,
i have got a issue in credit card sales scenario .in this case while i am releasing the invoice to accounting i m getting this error
insufficent authorization for sales document 2321.....
message: no:-V/032
procedure:check the authorization amount in the payment card plan and repeat autorization or reauthorize at a later time
i have checked the sales order there payment card amount is authorized n the sales order showing green signal and card authororization is sucessful and before that preauthorization was also there but final authorization is done.after that delivery also done. but while doing invoice releasing to accounting i am getting above issue.anybody plz help me no guess please need solution
regards,
Debesh

This link is applicable to you
[Read This Before Closing your Threads|Read This Before Closing your Threads;
As indicated therein, please dont add any such unwanted letters or characters just to close the thread. You can just click the Answered button. If you really want to show that you respect forum members time, better try to develop the habit of updating the forum properly if your issue is resolved.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Set "Sales Office" as an authorization for all sales document

Dear SD Expert,
        Base on ECC 6.0, I have to set authorization which check u201CSales Officeu201D in create/ change / display all sales document.
         I found that authorization object u201CV_VBKA_VKOu201D contain authorization filed ; that are, sales org, distribution, division, sales office and sales group. Also u201CV_VBKA_VKOu201D have assign to (Transaction code: VA03, VF03) as standard SAP (see in T-Code : SU24) . However, when I assign; for example, T-Code u201CVA03u201D, u201CVF03u201D in PFCG. After generated profile, only u201CSale org, distribution chan., and divisionu201D is pop-up. I wonder that
1)     Why u201CSales officeu201D dose not show in u201Corganization levelu201D ?
2)     How can I set u201CSales Officeu201D as an organization level? for checking an authorization
Please give me step-by-step.
Regards,
Prach

Refer SAP Help url it may help you , I did not work on this,[Maintain authorizations|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_45b/helpdata/en/91/6cec6eb435d1118b3f0060b03ca329/content.htm]

Initial load of sales orders from R3 to CRM without statuses

1) Some sales orders were uploaded into CRM without statuses in the headers or line items.
2) Some sales orders were uploaded without status, ship-to, sold-to, payer.....If I deleted them and use R3AR2, R3AR4 to upload each individual then no problem.
Any ideas or suggestions?
Thanks.

Hi,
   Request load of adapter objects uses different extractor modules for extracting the data from external system to CRM. While your initial load of sales docs. will use a different extraction logic bases on the filter conditions specfied on trx.
R3AC1
   There may be a problem in the extraction of data from the source system (don't know if you are using a R/3). Can you please de-register the R/3 (i suppose) outbound queue using trx.
SMQS
, and then debug the extraction (R/3 outbound) before the data is sent to CRM using FM
CRS_SEND_TO_SERVER
   If this goes well, you may try debugging the mapper in CRM inbound and the validation module in CRM as a last resort. Also, please refer to trx.
SMW01
to see if the Bdocs are fully processed.
Hope this helps...Reward if helpful.
Regards,
Sudipta.

No authorization for a sales document

Hello,
We are facing a strange issue. We have some sales orders. When user is trying to Access VA02 and modify a contract, We are getting an error as "No authorization to change this sales document". We could change some sales orders. We have observed two things here,
A) if a sales order has items in it,--> "No authorization to changes this sales document"
B) if a sales orders has no items in it --> "No problem with the authorization, we can modify the order".
Document type used for this sales order is ZC02. We have given ZC02 in role and 01,02,03,43,C1 and C2 activities in the roles along with proper Org values. still we are not able to open the sales order with change mode.
Could you please help me resolve this issue??

That is a custom authorization object and not a standard SAP one, right? My guess, in that case, is that the code that implements that auth object, presumably in a user exit or BAdI in VA02, is incorrect. That must be your code - time to speak to the person that wrote it?
Steve.

Document search error in webshop(Error in authorization check: user unknow)

Hi All
actually we have implemented the document search functionality in webshop to access all the documents in webshop who have created order in the webshop.
actually when i am logging into the portal with userid "skumar" after that there was role called "Document Search" when i click that document search role then the document search will be opened, based on the selections in the selection criteria then the documents will be displayed generally.
actually come to my error when i select in the selection criteria "order acknowledgement" and i select the one more column called "period" after that i click the search button then i am getting the error as follows.
Error in authorization check: user unknown.
Can you please help me where to check the authorizations in the system for accessing the documents.
Regards
Sunil

Hi Sunil generally this kind of error will occur when you choose acknoledgement
for Future Periods,eventhough input is past date if the same problem occurs you should check for Su05 Internet USer authoriasations
Reward if helpful
Venkat

Authorization at sales document header text type

Hi All,
Is it possible to have authority check at the sales document header text type ?
My basic requirement is to gray few text types at sales document header level in t-codes VA01 and VA02.
Appreciate your response.
Thanks,
Nagaraju

Hi raj,
U can configure Text Determination in T.code: VOTXN
it follows the condition technique
1. Define Condition Table
2. Define Access Sequence
3. Define Text Types
4. Define Text procedure
5. Activate to sales document types
there u can achieve ur purpose.
Reward if it helps.
Regards,
Anbu

Sales Document initial load Authorization check.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for