Sales employee related data not flowing in standard report MCTI and VF05

Dear All
I have created a partner function sales employee by coping VE.All assignments in partner determination done.After maintaining sales employee in customer master it is flowing to sales order.After processing invoice when i check the standard report MCTI and in VF05 under partner function tab,.the data is not flowing.I checked in the OVRP setting are there.
Please guide.
Regards,
Deepti

Hi,
Are you updated it as daily in OMO1
double click on infostructure S006 and select daily and see
Kapil

Similar Messages

Baseline date not flowing in MIRO transaction

Hi
Baseline date not flowing in MIRO while doing transaction.
We have maintained Payment terms in vendor master record
and payment terms maintained in PO also.
We have done the GR posting.
please help
Thanks and regards
Aakash

Are you use an MIRO with amount split? and does your payment term is configured with "No Default Date'? Then refer to OSS 495303.

Tax and pricing info are not flowing into Idoc orders02-eledp04 and 05

Hi,
We are carrying out SRM5.5 -SUS and ECC6.0 Integration using PI 7.
We are configuring for the MM-SUS Scenario.
Now,to accomodate the Tax / Pricing we have installed the add on
component LOCINSUS and we are having doubts on how to use it:
1) Tax and pricing information are not flowing into IDOC- orders02
(e1edp04 and e1edp05 segments are not present in the created IDOC). The
condition print indicator in checked on ECC System and we have also
implemented SAP note 995986.
2)In create ASN transaction , we are not able to see the Excise Invoice
Number and Date field in Basic data tab as expected from SAP Library
document although we have installed the Localization Add on component.
Please help us to reso1ve these issues,
Regards,
Mani
099890-22217.

Mani,
Did you resolve this issue, because we are having the same issue in ECC6 with IDoc ORDERS02.
If you did resolve this issue could you please let us know how, much appreciated.
Bill.

Sales Employee Description is not following into COPA

Dear Experts
I have set sales employee as a characteristic in my operating concern that was triggered from PAPARTNER. From there I developed then run COPA report painter (KE30) for sales employee with ALV display options. In fact the report can only display sales employee code, without the description. I desperately need sales employee description in my report, based on user requirement.
Here we didn't activate HR module. In the same time SD has defined Sales Employee as Partner Function (SE) in customer master data. The Partner Function is looked up the sales employee name from HR table, PA0001 so that they can display sales employee code and name in the customer master data.
From the story above I've tried to do some ways, such as:
Changed display options from ALV to Drilldown -> with this way, sales employee description can appear from the report, but actually I just need the ALV report because of my client didn't accept the report layout except ALV. This is my big problem.
2. I found other threads with similar problem with me, then I tried to follow that instructions that will be described below:
I tried to create new char WW100 with PARVW table for sales employee then follow these steps:
Create 2 derivation rules in KEDR using table look up (table VBPA) for the same partner function
1. In one Der Rule, make the sale order item KDPOS as constant value 0000
2. In the other one, dont make it a constant....Leave it as it is
DERIVATION RULE 1
SOURCE FIELDS
VBPA-VBELN = COPA-KAUFN
VBPA-POSNR = COPA-KDPOS
VBPA-PARVW = GLOBAL-USERTEMP1 (Click on Magnifying lens.. Specify Constant = Your SD Part Function)
TARGET FIELDS
VBPA-KUNNR = COPA-WW100
DERIVATION RULE 2
SOURCE FIELDS
VBPA-VBELN = COPA-KAUFN
VBPA-POSNR = COPA-KDPOS (Click on Magnifying lens.. Specify Constant = 0000)
VBPA-PARVW = GLOBAL-USERTEMP1 (Click on Magnifying lens.. Specify Constant = Your SD Part Function)
TARGET FIELDS
VBPA-KUNNR = COPA-WW100
Unfortunately the ways above still can't solve my problem, the report still only show the sales employee code without description. At the last whether possible if i want sales employee characteristic with origin table coming from PA0001, so that data will derive from HR table? or perhaps any other solution to solve my case?
Please suggest me in detail..
Thanks a lot
Regards,
Maradona

Hi Maradona,
I want a clarification - Does the value flow properly to the value field and only the description is not coming?
1. If the value flow is proper and only description is a problem, then check whether compunding has been used in KEA5 for the characteristc WW100? If yes, check the text table for WW100 and compare it with the origin table in terms of the fields in both the tables.
(My guess is that not all the compunding characteristics are available in text table)
2. If value flow is a problem, then compare SE16 and SE16N for any sales order for the denotion of partner function field PARVW. Sometimes the denotion of partner function (two character code) may vary in SE16 and SE16n.
Get back for any more query
BR
Abhi

Credit memo related Data not reflected in BCT Query

Hi Experts ,
If anyone can help me .
Problem : I have loaded data in 0SD_C03 for sales analysis. Everything is alright and all data except Credit Memo related data are showing . During the selection in query the C/D posting + Doc Categ + Net Value forms the output value for Credit memo but it is not showing . The SD doc categ has credit memo records in VBFA table . Now i don't understand why data related to Credit memo is not retrieved in the query . I am using the standard queries and std BCT objects only .If anyone have come across please share your experience .
Theba

Check in your Cube fact table whether you have entries with document category O - for credit memo
If not, ensure cube has the data and your query do not have any exclusion filter dor document category O. Check in PSA also, if not there your extractor is excluding the credit memo records

Item line data not flowing into SAP Adobe form layout

Hello Gurus,
I am currently working on adobe form layout for a sales document in SAP, i have created a master page
as well as a couple of pages in the design view. Data at the header level are working properly, but the item data
are not flowing into the layout, as nothing appears in the print preview for the item level of the sales document.
I have done all the necessary binding with all the right field names, my subform to the best of my knowledge seems to be well
defined, but yet to no avail.
I would like to know what yet could be the reason for this issue and how i can go about fixing it.
Thank you.
Ahm.

Hi Vijai,
In our project, we have the same requirement but I am one step behind than you. I am able to generate the PDF form but not able to generate the data. Means all the fields are coming as disabled fields.
Can you please send your code as a sample code so that I can have a look at that and check where I am doing wrong/missing. My id is sandeep.kamdar in gmail
Thanks & Regards,
Sandip Kamdar

Showing Monthly Sales Analysis for Sales Employees (including credit notes)

Hi Experts,
I want to show a report for my director so we can accurately decide upon sales targets for each sales employee for 2012.
The Monthly Report > Invoices by posting date in the Sales Analysis module is not ideal because it does not appear to include credit notes so the totals are incorrect.
How could I create a query which gave me a total for each month of 2011 for every sales employee which includes invoice minus credit notes.
Unfortunately my SQL is not great but I started something which might help - this is only for first 2 months of the year. I presume I would need a select statement for each month if I wanted to have the sales employee name followed by a total for each month. Maybe this is too intensive a query to run anyway.
SELECT T1.[SlpName],
(select(sum(t2.doctotal)-(t3.doctotal)) where (Month(t2.docdate)=1 and t3.docdate=1) FROM OCRD T0 INNER JOIN OSLP T1 ON T0.SlpCode = T1.SlpCode INNER JOIN OINV T2 ON T0.CardCode = T2.CardCode INNER JOIN ORIN T3 ON T0.CardCode = T3.CardCode)
(select(sum(t2.doctotal)-(t3.doctotal)) where (Month(t2.docdate)=2 and t3.docdate=1) FROM OCRD T0 INNER JOIN OSLP T1 ON T0.SlpCode = T1.SlpCode INNER JOIN OINV T2 ON T0.CardCode = T2.CardCode INNER JOIN ORIN T3 ON T0.CardCode = T3.CardCode)

Hi,
I have moved your posting here because it belongs here.
You may check this first: Re: Top Customers report
Thanks,
Gordon

Depot Sales-Excise values are not flowing from J1iJ to VF01

Hi Gurus,
In Depot Sales: while doing excise invoive from T-code J1iJ Go to delivery -RG23D selection select the delivery number XXXXX Excise Group 51 and series Group: 50 ENTER - select the line item and click on F6 and here we have to click on excise invoice Button for capturing the Input excise duties for taking the reference. And the excise values are shown here correctly.
Issue: In VF01- when we are raising the commercial invoice , the duty values are not flowing from the J1IJ transaction. Instead the values are showing Zero for all the three condition types namely JEXP, JECS and JHCS. We have used the Pricing Procedure ZINDEP and 356 routine.
Inputs on this how to solve will be highly appreciated.. as we are in critical stage.
What are the checks to be ensured to Get the values flow from J1IJ to VF01.
Scenario: STO from Mfrg Plant to Depot and Depot sales to customer.
Me21N-Me29N-VL10B-VL02N-VF01-J1IIn-MIGO-(STO process completes)-VA01-VL01N-J1IJ-VF01(duty values should flow from the J1IJ referenced Excise Invoice) Correct me if I am wrong.
Any user exits, Notes please let me know. I could not find any. I have gone through the forum threads, which speaks about 356 routine, J1ID- checks etc.
Thanks&Regards
Sreekanth:

Hi!
Am sure you would have captured the Excise at Depot with J1IG.
Also, have you saved the billing document to check the duties?
Thirdly, after save, again open the billing doc and go to Header-Conditions then Save. This part does not seems logical, but i am sharing my practical experience.
Please check condition records if any.
Regards
Arun

Data source Infocubes for standard reports

Hello Everybody,
Can you please assist - how to understand which data source will feed - which info-cube - which standard reports?
I am planning to activate standard reports in various module. How do I decide corresponding data source and info-cube relevant to these reports?
Thanks for your help.
TS

Hi ,
If you know the standard query name , then you can get the data provider name in the " information " tab ( bex Analyser). Using the infoprovider go to Business content > give , in data flow before and then install the infoprovider and all the relavant objects.Then go to RSA1 and check the infoprovider, right click on the infoprovider >display data flow
Hope this helps.
Thanks and regards

Difference in GL Balances between two Standard Report fbl3n and fagll03

Hi ,
Mismatch of balances between two standard report ie.fbl3n and fagll03 . We are giving the complete example of what we are facing right now ... please go through the examples .
ENTRY NO. 1
We have posted one MIRO , Accounting Posting is as below : -
PK         Description    Amount
86         GR/IR             1000.00
31         Vendor           -800.00
50          TDS               -200.00
ENTRY NO. 2
We have Reversed the MIRO through MR8M , Accounting Posting was as below : -
PK         Description     Amount
21         Vendor             800.00
40          TDS                 200.00
96          GR/IR            -1000.00
But in Standard report FAGLL03 , .The line items of above twoi entries under GL " TDS " are showing in this way : -
Doc No.      PK      Ammount
Entry 1       50          -200.00
Entry 2       40          -200.00 -
> ?????
*OPEN ITEMS          - 400.00----
> ?????
Although in other Standard report FBL3N , the same are showing correctly as shown below
Doc No.      PK      Ammount
Entry 1       50          -200.00
Entry 2       40          +200.00
*OPEN ITEMS                0.00
PLEASE HELP
Regards
Soumitra Bhattacharya

Hi
FAGLL03 - Display/Change Items (New) - this report is related to ledger reporting purpose. this reports is available after ECC 5.0.
FBL3N - is line item display - this is only GL reports (not in ledger reporting)
if you find any difference is values please check the report variant you are using and ledger you are activated.
hope this will help you.
Regards
Ram

Difference between standard report S_ALR_87011963 and the custom report

Hi Friends,
My client requires a report which displays the acquisition and depreciation values of assets. Actually the requirement is to display all the values except planned depreciation.
Therefore we are taking the values only from the table ANLP. However the values in this report is not matching with that of the standard. In the standard report the Current Book Value should be selected to avoid planned depreciation. Am i right??
So once the CBV is checked the standard report will display only the posted values for a period.
But we are getting a huge difference in the depreciation value between the two reports.
Please help me out on this.
Regards,
Prasad

I think your client requires to see Gross asset value and Deon posted in the report for all the years (not for current year only). If that is the case, current book value = APC - Depn posted earlier, so it gives wrong result.
Ex : Asset acquired in 2006 ; APC = 1000$ ; Depn posted in 2006 : 100$, so current book value is 900$.
So, I would suggest to have a look at the logical data base ADA or use ANLC, ANLV, ANLQ, etc or ANL* and search for the relavant tables required for your purpose.
regards
S

MM standard reports MB51 and MB52 very slow processing

We are using standard reports of MM MB51 and MB52, they are taking too much time to execute and display the results. can any please let us know what precautionary measures we can take to make these reports to execute fast.
Thanks in advance.

Yes Agreed ,this might be SAP note issue , please find latest sap note ,you can refer above said repots also
921164 -     MB51: Improving the runtime using database hints
902675-     MB51: Database hints to improve runtime / 4.70
1283280-     MB51: Enhancements to multiple account assignment display
1233616-     MB51: Bad performance by selection material numbers
555893-     MB51: Preventing runtime error DBIF_RSQL_INVALID_RSQL
1159120-     MB51: Selection of material numbers not quite correctly
531604-     MB52: Performance improvement
540257-     MB52: Performance improvement (only for Release 4.5B)
129599-     MB52: Performance, incorrect display
Regards,
Sandesh Sawant

Help needed-Survey template data not flowing from CRM to Mobile & V V

Hi experts,
We have a requirement to create a custom survey template and pass it to mobile. The data flow should be to and fro. as in; from CRM to Mobile Application and vice versa.
Currently we are facing an issue in this that the data if not being passed properly from the CRM TO Moblie.
As i am new to the middleware concepts, i am not sure how to go about analysing if my data in the BDocs for the survey template if correct or not.Some data is present for the survey in the Bdoc(xml), but i am not sure if this xml value is correct or not as the Bdoc table entry (xml value)seems to have been truncated(i cannot view the entire xml there wen i try to open the BDoc fields in SMW01).
any pointers to this is highly appreciated.
Thanks
Swapna.

May be this thread will help
v('APP_USER') not returning HTMLDB user
regards,
Shijesh

Disabled subscription sends notifications, relative date not working properly

Hi
I have two problems regarding subscriptions:
1.When I disable a subscription, should I receive any further notifications? I am receiving notifications despite disabling the subscription.
(I have cloned the template and deleted the original template, then sending email notification will be stopped, but as soon as assigning new template to subscription, sending emails starts, whether subscription is enabled or not)
2. The criteria for subscription is as follows:
Status = Active or Status = Pending and Source = Portal and Created date [relative] = [now-7d]
Regarding the criteria, it must check whether it has past 7 days from incident creation, but it starts sending notifications without considering the [now -7d] condition.
I use SCSM 2012 SP1 - Rollup 6.
Am I doing something wrong?
YSobhdel

The actual criteria was Created Date greater than or equal to [now-7d]
What I am trying to accomplish is that whenever an open incident (i.e., not resolved or closed incident) is active more than 7 days, assigned to user will be notified.
My Question is , why is it happening in the first place, this criteria is nearly impossible to catch (equal to [now-7d]), yet it is sending notifications from the first day. I have testes the notification with
Created Date greater than or equal to [now-7d] as well but to no avail, still the same problem.
About delay, I am 100% sure that this is not performance problem, since this workflow is set to periodically check criteria and is run once a day. I have waited for the setting to apply for about two days and this is far beyond any delay! (for two consecutive
days, I have received this notification).
YSobhdel

Sales order delivery date not update on PO delivery confirmation

Hi all,
I have the following issue. When a sales order is created for a material that is to be purchased a purch req is automatically created. Next I create a Po from this Purch req. When I confirm the delivery date to a later date in this po and do this without entering a storage loc in the po, the delivery date in the sales order remains unchanged, which should be adjusted according to the confirmed delivery date in the PO.
When I do this with a storage location, the date is changed in the sales order.
Anybody any ideas on what could be the reason for this?
Thanks,
Kevin.

Hi there,
I thumb rule that you have to follow when posting the thread is, to be clear in what you are asking. Looking at the thread posted, can you make out anything? No spaces, no full stops. How will people understand what your query is? Just read back your question & help us understand what does the query mean.
From what you have given, you are saying that in material master MRP views, GR processing time is mentioned as 15 days. What after that? Are you asking of the materials are available before that 15 days & you run an availability check is the delivery date going to change? Is that what you are asking?
If the material is already available on that date, system will confirm the reqested delivery date. If item is not available then system will propose a new confirmed delivery date basing on the availability check. It will not propose a date which is earlier to the requested delivery date. It either confirms the requested delivery date or proposes a confirmed delivery date at a later time.
For eg when the customer requests delivery on the 25th in the sales order, then if material is available, system will confirm 25th as the delivery date. If material is not available,, then it will check item availability & proposes 28th as confimed delivery date. It will never propose 22nd as delivery date.
Regards,
Sivanand

Sales employee related data not flowing in standard report MCTI and VF05

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for