Sales Order Net Value - Round off
Hi Guru's,
I am having a requirement to round off the total value (VBAK - NETWR) in sales order.
Condition type DIFF is not fulfilling our requirement because its functioning as an item condition. It's doing round off for each line item.
Our requirement is Header level net value round off.
I have searched in SCN but I cant able to find any solution. Kindly throw some light on this subject.
Regards,
Dinesh
Hi,
After downloaded the note 1158475 implementation status show that cannot be implemented.
Check the screenshot below.
Regards,
Dinesh
Similar Messages
-
BOM not exploding in Sales order & Net Value error
Hello Dear all,
I have created a product "A" with BOM items 10, 20 & 30.
Item cat. Gr for "A" is ERLA & for 10, 20 & 30 is LUMF.
I have also created BOM with these 3 matls. (ie 10, 20 & 30).
When processing Sales Order Item cat. appeared in SO for "A" is TAP & for other 3 is TAN. "A" shows the price maintained for it, but not showing Net Value at Header level data in SO.
Also document is incomplete because of Net value for Items 10, 20 & 30.
I don?t want price of 10, 20 & 30 should display in SO at Item level
Can anyone suggest the required setting?
Thanks
Shanhi,
For BOM mainly two material groups are used.
LUMF and ERLA.
If you used ERLA in the main material which consists of different materials then the pricing would be carried out only for the main item, while the other sub items pricing would not be displayed.
while if you use LUMF then the main material would not be priced but only the sub items would be relevant for pricing the the total of all the sub items forms the basis of the sales order net value.
regarding the net value error you can just check the pricing configuration for the steps and sub total.
regards,
Siddharth.
Edited by: SD on Mar 11, 2008 7:51 AM -
Sales order net value and invoice net value differ
Hi Gurus,
i placed sale order 03/08/2009 the net value of the order is 30000 USD, the same day i have done some price modification (manually i entered the header condition with value of 50 USD) after entering the header condition sales order net values is showing 50 USD. then delivered and invoiced. in the invoice net value is showing 30000 USD. my requirement is the invoice also has to show the 50 USD only. why it is not showing the sales order net value? is there any setting need to be done regarding this problem?
Thanks in advancei changed the pricing type as D
From your comments, I presume in copy control, a different alpha value would have been maintained and with that settings, sale order, delivery and billing were generated.
What I would suggest you is that you create a sale order once again for the same customer and 5 materials, make same changes in pricing, do PGI and billing. See how it works.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi -
How and where the sales order net value will be communicate with credit management as a open order value?
Hi Gopalal.,
The subtotal field A is related with credit managemnt in Pricing,In pricing if we want to caliculate the credit limit on only PR00 you can set subtotal A immediatly after A,If you want to caliculate Credit limit after dicounts then Subtotal A should be placed after discounts,
So Subtotal A is nothing but the values of the pricing are stored in A field which compares the credit limit in sales order
IMPORTANT thing is credit limit gets updated with the help Of INfo structure SO66 in OMO1
REWARD if helpfull
Thanks & Regards
Narayana -
DP91(RRB) Restrict DMR Billing value to Sales Order Net Value
Hi Experts,
My Requirement is, while creating a DMR using transaction DP91 (Resource Related Billing), I need to restrict the DMR value to the sales order Net Value. i.e If there are already billed DMR'S we should check all the billing documents value, sum it up with present DP91 billing value (Say X). Check it against Sales order net value.
IF Sales order net value is more than already billed value or to be billed value(X), then optimize the DIP items within available billing value (Planning to use bin packing algorithm) and postpone remaining items for next billing cycle.
If Sales order net value is less than already billed value or to be billed value(X), postpone all DIP items for next billing cycle ie dont allow any billing.
I found the Enhancement AD010007 Change DI Processing Information (EXIT_SAPLAD15_015). But it triggers for each item and here sales order related data is not available neither all DIP item data. All DIP data is flowing from WBS assigned in Sales Order item into DP91.
Regards,
MaheshHi,
You can make use of data transfer routines in copy control from billing document to sales document.
Data transfer routine - 403 (FV45C403) is used for copying billing plan dates from from a reference billing document into the target document. This routine can be assigned to the FPLA copy rules for the item category from a billing document to a sales document.
You may enhance this routine to add net value field to be copied into credit memo document. In your case, net amount (100) can be pulled from invoice into credit memo document.
Regards,
Vaibhav -
IN which table stores the Value of sales orders Net Value
IN which table stores the Value of sales orders Net Value
Hi Lakshmi,
Check Following Tables:
CRMD_PRICING_I
CRMM_PR_SALESA
CNCCRMPRSAP00090
Reward Points if Helpful.
Srini. -
Freight to be calculated based on sales order net value
Hello Experts,
We have got a scenario,
The net value of the sales order is 1194, 13 Euro, the customer has to pay
6,40 Euro freight costs one time for this order. If we donu2019t deliver all items based on backorder or something else, the customer has not to pay for the additional delivery.
These are the general terms and conditions.
The system charges for the additional delivery the freight costs once again
dependent on the net value of the 2. Delivery and so on
In the example :
According to the general terms and condition the customer has to pay for the
order one time with the first invoice -> 6,40 Euro freight cost.
But the system had invoiced for the additional delivery with the invoice ->20, 60 Euro independent of the net value of the additional delivery.
And we have to create a credit note for the customer.
If we have several shipments of one order the system charges the freight costs of each shipment concerning to the net value.
Thanks & Regards,If we donu2019t deliver all items based on backorder or something else,
the customer has not to pay for the additional delivery.
For this, you can have one header condition type and input manually the value if need be. If you want to automate, then you have to go with adding the required codings to your routine which I feel, will complicate the system.
G. Lakshmipathi -
Sales Order Net value in Simulate Mode
Hi All,
My client has done upgrade. In new envoirnment pricing procedures/conditions have been update. Requirement is to update all Open Sales Order. I am doing that with bapi_salesorder_change but before the change I need to simulate the Sales Order to compare the NET VALUE (NETWR)at line item and header level, before the update and after the sales order update .. If due to new pricing procedure net value is found different then BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE should not be executed.
Hope I explain my problem clearly,. if not I will be glad to provide further explaination. I have tried bapi_salesorder_simulate but it is not giving me expected net value.
Thanks,Hi Abdul,
SALES_ORDER_SIMULATE will return the values with the current pricing conditions for the material, which the BAPI picks from material master.
I would assume that the upgrade has already affected the config and new pricing conditions are in place.
please explain your question clearly. -
Sales order net value to be made uneditable after dispatch
HI ,
My requirement is that in teh condition tab of sales order my net value "ZPP" should be uneditable once material has been dispatched against the line, as of now it remains editable .
Kindly guidehi
this can b done throuh exit only, contact ur abaper.
regards
sk -
Static Credit Limit Check for Sales Orders - Net Value vs Credit Value
We are testing order credit check and we have run into a problem with the Static Credit Limit Check. The Static Credit Limit Check is set to use both Order and Delivery Values. SAP uses the values in S066 and S067 to determine what values it uses to check against the credit limit. Standard SAP uses the confirmed quantity times the credit price to get the order values - this is the credit value.
So the problem is, once an order is released it is set up so it does not go back on credit hold, so anything which is not confirmed (but could be) it a potential credit value which is unaccounted for in the credit exposure and the customer can go over the credit limit.
Additionally, we run AFS and have items which are rejected with a J0 rejection code (unconfirmed) which have the potential of being confirmed and shipped and we want to include these items in the value of the order which is being checked against the credit limit (along with the deliveries, invoices and receivables).
Here is a quick example.
Customer has a credit limit of $100 (no deliveries, invoices or receivables - to keep it simple)
Order 1 is placed with a credit value of $50.00 but a potential value of $100 (the other half is J0) - this passes the credit check since $50.00 is less than the limit.
Order 2 is placed for $50.00 and has a credit value of $50. This also gets approved.
At this point, the credit limit used is 100% (based on standard SAP)
Then Order1 backorder is confirmed and the new credit value is now $100. This order now puts the customer over their limit and if the order had been released would not go back on credit hold and therefore the customer is not over their credit limit by 50%.
What I want is for Order1 to be credit checked for the $100 not the $50 so the exposure is correct.
Does anyone have any suggestions as to how we could use the Net Value of the order to perform the static credit check? And any thoughts on how to determine the correct credit exposure (open order value plus items which are J0, plus deliveries, plus invoices, plus receivables)?
I am thinking about a Z table to track the adjusted values on the orders and then use one of the customer checks to do a static credit check with the adjusted value. And for the exposure, use the adjusted value to recalculate the values in F.35 to show a more accurate view of the credit exposure.
Does anyone have an easier way to do this? Any advice is appreciated.
Thanks,
SuzanneHi Suzzane,
In the scenario that you have provided, in the first order items worth 50$ are rejected. Hence standard SAP will not take this into account as this item is rejected.Two solutions can be provided here:
1) The line item can have a delivery block instead of a reason for rejection.This way the 50$ will get accounted.However, if this is against customer norms as this will appear in the order acknowledgment, this cannot be used.
2) User exit can be used where a credit check can be triggered once the document value changes, even though the document has a released status.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Vinu -
View sales order net price and relavent putchase order effective price
I;m using purchase to order sap solution. every sales order has single or multiple purchase orders. I nned to check the putchase order effective price agianst the sales order net price. Can i see both data in sales order, purchase order or any other standard report for this.
Hi,
There is no direct way to see sales order net value and purchase order value associated with sales order.
you can view it by going inside VA02 or VA03 and click on document flow,then SO and P.O net value viewed.
check t-code ME2K, put sales order number and see
kapil -
Sales Order Discount Pricing Rounding Error
When we use discount RA01 in our Sales Pricing / Orders it results in rounding issue that shows on Customer Invoice.
eg: Sales Order Conditions Tab
Product XXXX x 2 EACH
CnTy Amount (per ea)
PR00 $141.55 EA
RA01 10%
$14.16
Net Val $127.40EA
Total Condition Value (x Order qty)
PR00 $283.10
RA01 $28.31
Net Val $254.79
So what the Customer sees is the unit price of $127.40 and totol line cost of $254.79.
But $127.40 x 2 is obviously $254.80
It looks as though the discount is being calculated as 14.155, then the Net Value rounding from $127.395 to $127.40
Where as the TOTAL Net Value for the line is showing the $127.395 x 2 = $254.79.
How do we get this scenario to result in the Net Value Amount, and Net Value Condition Value multiplying correctly by Qty on the Order??
Thanks
Hayley McDougalHi Thenmozhi
Sorry for confusion, I am responding to your question above using a new Public logon, as the logon i used to raise this question has been locked, and SAP advise may take a few days to rectify. But I am hoping I can sort this issue ASAP.
The Requirements indicator for PR00 and RA01 is 2
The Calculation Type is PR00 = C (qty) and RA01 = A (%)
The Net Price, PR00 and RA01 are all set to Rounding = Commercial.
Thanks -
Sales order minimum value issue
Hello,
Could you please provide some inforamtion regarding the sales order minimum value infoarmtion like where we can maintain that value?
Regards|ksrhi
You can specify a minimum order value for sales order processing. The following example illustrates how this function is used:
You specify a minimum order value of USD 200.
During sales order processing, the net value (after discounts and freight, before taxes) of an incoming order is USD 190.08.
During pricing, the system determines that the net value falls below the minimum order value and calculates a minimum-order-value surcharge. In this example, the surcharge equals USD 9.92.
The minimum order value and the surcharge appear as separate lines in the pricing screen. The minimum value is for information purposes only, and does not affect pricing. The system automatically adjusts the net value of the order (before taxes) to the minimum value allowed.
If you use minimum-order-value requirements, you must create condition records for condition type AMIW. In these condition records, you specify customers and the corresponding minimum order values. During pricing, the system automatically uses these condition records as a reference for determining the relevant minimum order surcharges (condition type AMIZ). In the standard version, condition type AMIZ refers to AMIW. This means that the system automatically calculates values for AMIZ conditions; you do not need to create separate condition records.
You may want to specify minimum order values by sales organization or division instead of by customer. In order to do this, your system administrator must define a new condition table with the appropriate fields in the table key. The condition table can then be included in the access sequence for condition type AMIW. -
Open Sales Order quantity & value
Hi,
We have a requirement here of report to show open sales order quantity & value for any month (monthend). There is a datasource 2LIS_11_V_ITM which gives Open order quantity. I have created an ODS with 2LIS_11_VAITM & 2LIS_11_V_ITM which can give me desired qty & value, but only for date of last data upload and not for date in the past.(and to get that, I have to sumup all open orders quantity without using any date filter)
I am thinking of creating a Infocube over this ODS to update the Open Order qty & value at the monthend (Snapshot scenario). But to update this, I am not able to get the logic for date to be used in time dimension.
If anyone can think of the solution or any alternate way to develop this kind of report, your help/suggestions are most welcome.
Thanks,
Vikram.Hi Vikram,
Find the link, which solves u r requirement
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/bi/arobustdesignofopensalesorderdataflow
Thanks & Regards
Ramakrishna Kamurthy -
Open sales order credit value (S066-OEIKW)
Hello experts,
I need to update the table S066 with the Open sales order credit value when an item has no confirmed quantity (VBEP-BMENG). So I have created the new rountine under
VOFM -> Requirements -> Credit checks -> new include RVKMP901. But I don't know how to update this table.
From the note 377165, the same is explained. But I am niot able to achieve my requirement.
So please help me in this regard.
Waiting for your reply.
Any Suggestion...
With regards,
Vasanth M
Edited by: Vasanth M on Feb 15, 2010 8:21 PMHello Jack,
Thanks fo your answer. But I have to update the credit amount to the table S066.
This credit limit could be viewed in the TC FD33. So please suggest me what to do.
Thanks in Advance
Best Regards,
Vasanth M
Maybe you are looking for
-
How to force all characters in prompt text field will be in uppercase???
Hi everybody How to get that all characters in a prompt field of a Webi report will be compared in uppercase with the database field ?? Even if the user input text in lower case. this is due to the database all filelds are in uppercase, and avoid to
-
How do I find dynamically related files where Wordpress is not involved
There are lots of posts about "Dynamically-related files could not be resolved because the site definition is not correct for this server" but they all seem to relate to Wordpress or other blogging software. I have recently had to upgrade from DW8 to
-
Hi to all, I have a problem, when i build a XML document in my PL/SQL, using xmldom class, i want to set xmlns only in root node. This is my code: doc xmldom.DOMDocument; main_node xmldom.DOMNode; root_node xmldom.DOMNode; root_elmt xmldom.DOMElement
-
Playback of a whole album didn´t work on my itunes 11.03.42 64bit
I tried to double click on the album but nothing happens. I re-installed itunes, but still the same. I tried the same with my notebook (itunes 11.03.42 32bit, network) and the playback of the album works. Any Ideas ? Thanx Frank
-
Upgrade Path for migrating Essbase 7.1 to Essbase 11.1.2.1??
Can any one tell me the upgrade path (and related documents) for migrating Essbase 7.1 to Essbase 11.1.2.1??