Sales order settlement Problem with Internal Order

HI Dear Friends,
How are you, I am fine.
We have 1 Process here Related with SD & FI/CO
for 1 process we have treat as a small Project,
the process is we have make 1st Contract and create Internal order and assign Internal order to Contract
then Create Sales Release Order and assing Internal Order in Settlement Rule in Sales order.
then we create billing ref to Contract and then we did PGI.
1) at billing time the Internal Order is Updatting
2) at PGI time internal Order is not updating  - what is the right process - the internal; Order will be updating or not
then we have to do Sales order Settlement thtough Trasaction code VA88
what will happned at this level pleas be advicsed becos when i do this it is giving messges not is toi be settled.
Friends I did all exercise complete except Settlement trough T-Code VA88.
When I am going to do this settlement VA88 it is giving messages there is nothing to be settle.
What I have to do please be advised.
I did all these activities:
1)     Create sales Contract
2)     Create Internal Order
3)     Assign Internal Order to sales Contract
4)     Crate Release Sales Order
5)     Assign Internal Order to Release Sales Order
6)     Delivery & PGI
7)     Billing         (at billing time the internal Order should be Updates (pls advise it should be or not)
8)     Last is Settlement VA88 u2013 this time it is giving Error.
When I settle the Sales order to internal order what will happens. Which value will update.
Please reply me frds,
Thanks,
Srem.

hello Lakshmipathi,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
I tried to change the requierement class in order to put one with special stock E as you explained, but i still have my weird schedule line. When i put the item in the order it is 0 stock for today, but stock find in 12 days either if there is stock or no(unrestricted stock i mean).
If i change the RDD in more than 12 days the stock is available for the date requested.
If you have an idea of what could be wrong because on my case i want the schedule line to be at 0 while the sales order reservation has not been processed (via MB1B/412/E) and once the stock movement is done the schedule line has to be find.
I dont know if im clear enought..
To be more clear,  i want the schedule line based on the "sales order stock" and not on the "unrestricted stock".
thanks for your help!
Guillaume

Similar Messages

  • Production order settlement to statistical internal order

    If you would like to settle a production order to a statistical internal order, could you at the same time settle to COPA ?

    Hi,
    principally its possible to add a real settlement receiver and a statistical settlement receiver. If you have entered the real acount assignment (CO-PA = PSG) in the settlement rule mark the line, tick the "detail" button (F2) and enter the statistical account assignment.
    The settlement receivers (PSG and ORD) must be allowed in the settlement profile and in the allocation structure there must be a settlement cost element assigned to receiver type "PSG and ORD" (or it is settled cost element wise).
    Please try!
    Best regards, Christian

  • Problem with internal order creation using BAPI_INTERNALORDER_CREATE. Help!

    Hi Experts,
    I am facing a strange problem in SAP. I have a scenario where I am integrating a .Net application with SAP R/3 via SAP XI.
    The .Net application is calling XI web service via SOAP adapter. The XI then sends the data to the SAP R/3 system via RFC adapter.
    XI calls the BAPI u201CBAPI_INTERNALORDER_CREATEu201D to create a new internal order in the R/3 system.
    This scenario works perfectly fine when tested via XIu2019s runtime workbench or any SOAP or web service testing tool. New internal order gets created in the R/3 system without any issue. But when I test the same via the .Net application I found that the order is getting created properly but some fields like currency and cost center are disabled or grayed out in change mode. Have you encountered this problem earlier? Any clue what could be the root cause?
    Please help!
    thanks
    Gopal

    Hi Sampanth,
        I think you did not understood my scenario. In real time or production situation I have to use .Net application to send data to XI. The XI will then send the same to R/3 system to create the internal order.
    The .Net code is calling the XI's webservice using C# code and sends the data as a SOAP request.
    How can .Net code grayout some fields in SAP R/3 system? Can you elaborate on what are you trying to explain?
    Thanks
    Gopal

  • Excise problem with internal order

    Dear All
    W have internal order budgeting for consumables.whenever we make purchase order , the account assignment category is f and we purcahse against the particular internal order.
    when G/R is done the consumable material gets cosnumed against the particular interla order. ie goods receipt and the issue against the internal order with same movement type.
    here is the problem
    Whenevere G/R is made the part 1 register(country india version) gets updated .
    But because of goods issue against internal order , the part 1 register shows both the receipt and the issue . so whenever the excise invoice is made through j1iex thesystem shows that part 1 entry is not vailable.
    In the part 1 register printout shows the receipt and the removal of goods.
    as per the excise regulations the part 1 entry sholud be there for the particular material. please suggest how to avoid the removal entry in part 1 register. only receipt has to be updated in the part 1 not the removal ie goods issue.
    please suggest how to overcome this issue.
    With Regards
    balaji

    Hi Balaji,
    Standard SAP CIN config provides agisnt which all movement type the excise invoice are gererated. Kindly check your movement for Goods Issue and remove config.
    Node: SPRO>Logistics - General>Tax on Goods Movements>India>Incoming Excise Invoices-->Specify Which Movement Types Involve Excise Invoices
    Regards,
    Narasimha Rao

  • Internal order settle to another internal order

    dear all,
    for internal order group have 2 order,and i want to settle by hierachy:
    A order settle to B order,then B order settle to GL account, how to config the settlement rule for
    this 2 orders?
    this purpose is to simulate PS WBS/activity if internal order can be collect cost then settle to a final GL acct..

    maybe i have make more detail for my question:
    a  order group contain internal order A/B,and order B under A like follow structure:
    order group
      - order A
         -- order B
    order A have plan/actual revenue/cost
    order B only have plan cost
    the settlement is try to settle order group: as my RA key is set as POC way to calculate revenue/cost,
    the formula of POC = actual cost / plan cost * plan revenue
    so i want the settle result of this group = actual cost of A / plan cost of A+B * plan revenue of A
    now the settle result = actual cost of A / plan cost of A * plan revenue of A,not include plan cost of B
    how to make it possible?

  • Problems and Issues with Internal Order Transactions

    Hello I have a couple of problems with Internal Order Transactons.
    Its strange really, when I simulate in the development server. I do the following process:
    Assign Asset with IO -> Create PR with account assignment to an Asset -> Create PO with Reference to PR -> Create GR.
    Once this occurs, the transaction seems to reflect in particular reports such as List: Order by Cost Element, List: Budget/Actual/Commitments, etc.
    But when another user does a similar process in PRD, it doesnt seem to reflect in these reports.
    Also while, I cant seem to pass the GR if the Internal Order has not been released. The user was able to create a GR whose IO has not been released yet.
    These problems are quite striking to me. Does anyone know the possible causes of the situations at hand? Any feedback will be most helpful.
    Thank you all and good day.

    Ok never mind, seems I found the culprit (though the reason gives more questions than answers)! Thanks anyways

  • AuC settlement with internal order

    friends,
    while settling AUC with interanal order in settlement rule i have given 100%, but after executing the settlement it is splitting the amount in three gl accounts, i created this internal order with type 0600 and object class - investment.
    regards,

    Hi,
    In the Allocation Structure you might have maintained these cost elements against the receiver.
    Thanks,
    Giridhar

  • Freegoods issue with internal order CO

    Dear Experts,
    I am facing a Problem with free goods issue,
    When I am doing sales order VA01 I am entering internal order number, once I complete the process flow it is crediting stock account (24240000) and debiting the COGS FG (50014000) account.
    When I am doing sales order VA01 without internal order once I complete the process flow it is crediting Stock account (24240000)  and Debiting the Free goods expenses account(60014010) (as per business process it is correct)
    With internal order also it should post to free goods expenses account.
    Kindly help me on this I am not able to trace.

    Hi
    Please check item category TANN settings.Also check in VTLA copy control  there is a feild "Update Cost", tick the feild.
    Please go through the links which may help you
    PGI accounting
    Regards
    Srinath

  • Settlement Rule for Internal Order

    Hi All
    I have Maintained Settlement rule for Internal order as under
    CAT - FXA
    Settlement Receiver - Asset
    % - 100
    Settlement type - Full
    Now after settlement of above Order in KO88 . I want again use above internal order. Hence i have trying to put Settlement rule 50% for some anther asset but system gave me following error. Please guide on this issue.
    Total = 50.00%, ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ), period 010/2011
    Message no. KD042
    Diagnosis
    You have entered distribution rules which settle 50.00% in total. This applies for settlement view ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ) in period 010/2011.
    When checking the percentage total, the system found one of the following errors:
    The total percentage for the distribution rules is more than 100%
    The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and this is a rule for full settlement.
    The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and the 100% check is switched on in the settlement profile.

    Hi:
            Please refer to the contents of OSS Note 45612 - IM: pre-settlement does not work, or KD042... which states
    "Symptom
        1. If a preliminary settlement rule (for example, to cost center) is entered for individual items of capital investment measures with line item management, this rule is not considered during periodic settlement. There is no settlement to cost centers.
        2. If you enter a final settlement rule for individual line items of investment measures with line item management for a partial capitalization (that is, the percentage rate is less than 100%), then you receive the unjustified error message KD042 "Total percent = xx%".
    Additional key words
    KOB5, CJ70, CJ88, CJ8G, KO88, KO8G, preliminary settlement, partial settlement, partial capitalization
    Cause and prerequisites
        1. You did not enter the settlement type ACT in the preliminary settlement rule.
        You can check this in the Line Item Apportionment transaction by choosing the menu option "Goto" -> "Overview dist. rules" to display the distribution rule groups entered so far.
        The system displays rules which have no entry in the "SetTyp" field (settlement type, field name PERBZ).
        2. The check of the percentages is incorrect.
    Solution
        1. Install the following correction. Afterwards reverse the incorrect settlement, re-enter the preliminary settlement rule and settle again.
        2. Install the following correction. Afterwards, you can maintain the settlement rule for the partial settlement.
        Note: If you want to use a default settlement rule (maintaining the settlement rule from the master data maintenance transaction), then you are required to distribute the line items at 100%. In order to carry out a partial capitalization (settlement of less than 100%), you have to use menu path "Actual postings -> Period-end closing -> Settlement -> Line item "
    Regards

  • TX CNS41 - settled cost from internal order to WBS element not displayed

    Hi PS Expets,
    I have a question regarding transaction CNS41 "Structure Overview" where cost settled from an internal order is not displayed in in the report for a selected project. This is in a ECC version 5.0
    Settled costs from internal orders are posted with transaction type KOAO on WBS elements and when you check report RCNSTFCO you can see that the following transaction types are deselected when executing transaction CNS41:
    delete t_rpsco_m where vorga = 'KOAO' "<   insert
                          or vorga = 'KOAL' "<   insert
                          or vorga = 'KOAP' "<   insert
                          or vorga = 'KOAQ' "<   insert
                          or vorga = 'KOAR'."<   insert
      CALL FUNCTION 'HFPM_RPSCO_TO_RPSCO_LIS_CONV'
    This is implemented according to OSS note 51971 in order to eliminate internal business volume in the project structure when executing a PS hierarchy report.
    But this also eliminate the display of the cost  from the internal order.
    Any ideas or a work around in order to display settled cost from an internal order on a WBS element in transaction CNS41
    Kind regards,
    Anne

    Hello Tison.
    I guess you have the Project created with a BAPI in your system in background. As far as I have seen I'd try the following in ABAP to create Partners in the Project Definition: BAPI_BUS2001_PARTNER_CREATE_M or the corresponding method ProjectDefinitionPI.PartnerCreateMultiple. This should happen in background when the Project is created also.
    Best regards.
    Jens Schmid

  • Purchase Order with Internal Order

    Dear all,
    Are there any reports in SAP that will show the value of the Internal order with respect to Purchase Orders?
    Thank you.

    HI,
    These are the tcodes which gives the standard functionality of internal orders
    FCOM_RULE_OCL     Rule for Internal Order Line Items
    FCOM_RULE_OCV     Rule for Internal Order Variances
    FCOM_RULE_OL     Rule for Internal Order Line Items
    FCOM_RULE_OV     Rule for Internal Order Variances
    GJRG_5JCB     Internal orders: overview actuals
    JKB1     Create internal order
    JKB1X     Create Internal Order
    JKB2     Change internal order
    JKB2X     Change Internal Order
    JKB3     Display internal order
    JKB3X     Display Internal Order
    JKB4     Display internal order
    KAMN     Menu for Internal Orders
    KKBC_ORD_INT     Analyze Internal Order
    KO01     Create Internal Order
    KO03     Display Internal Order
    KO14     Copy Planing for Internal Orders
    KO1ECP     Internal Orders: Easy Cost Planning
    KO9E     Plan Settlement: Internal Order
    KO9G     Plan Settlement: Internal Orders
    KOA1     Send Internal Order
    KOK2     Collective Proc. Internal Orders
    KOK3     Collective Disp. Internal Orders
    KOK4     Aut. Collect. Proc. Internal Orders
    KOK5     Master Data List Internal Orders
    KOK6     Collect. Printing of Internal Orders
    KOSRLIST_OR     Internal Orders: Coll. Displ. SettRu
    KOT2_OPA     Order types for internal orders
    KOT2_OPA_STSMA     Order Types for Internal Orders
    KOT3_OPA     Order types for internal orders
    KSR1_ORC     Strategies for Internal Orders
    KSR2_ORC     Strategy Sequences: Internal Orders
    In case if it does not contain the information then you have to go in for a development of the report.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Kiran

  • Profit center substitution with internal order when generating GL doc from

    Profit center substitution with internal order when generating GL doc from MM
    Dear expert,
    Please advise how to substitute successfully the profit center by which user-exit via FI substitution function.
    Substitutions have been set for profit centers in FI via t-code OBBH, but  the profit center will always be determined from the internal order when posting from MM subcon goods receipt
    Thanks
    James
    Edited by: Yun-Chung Yung on Jun 3, 2010 10:46 PM

    Hi,
    SAP give note 539421 - Dummy profit center with cost center
    account assignment. Looks applicable for your case.
    Solution:
    With the attached modification, you can restore the function from Release
    3.1: The directly assigned profit center remains and is not overwritten
    with the dummy profit center of the cost center.
    The problem is not caused by a program error in this case. The profit
    center is always derived from the existing CO account assignment even if
    this is the dummy profit center (see also Note 62417).
    This note applicable from release 40 until 605
    I hope this can help you. FYI, in my case, i do not create dummy profit centre, then profit centre working as sap priority.
    Regards,
    Dewi

  • AUC settings with Internal Order

    Hi,
    Can you please give me the steps of AUC setting with Internal Order.
    Regards
    Abhi

    1) KO01
    The Process of AUC settlement in SAP  is create a capital order ( KO01), within the order on the top  go to extras and then asset under construction, create AUC using Asset class for AUC.
    2) KO21
    Then you can budget that asset in KO21.
    3) KO02 :- Release the order
    4) Make posting to the order
    5) KO88 Settle the order  to AUC
    6) KO02 add a fixed asset  to the settlement to rule to which you want to settle AUC
    7) KO88 again and do a settlemet to the fixed asset.
    Hope this helps.
    Tanya

  • Can not post FI document with internal Order

    Hi all,
    I work with SAP version ECC 6.0. When I post a FI document with internal order, I have a problem":
    "FI: Postings" is not allowed (ORD 400000)
    Message no. BS007
    Diagnosis
    The current status of object 'ORD 400000' prohibits business transaction 'FI: Postings'.
    Procedure
    To process business transaction 'FI: Postings', you first have to change the status of object 'ORD 400000' to allow the transaction 'FI: Postings'.
    This gives you an overview of the system and user statuses that affect the transaction. A transaction can only be executed if there is at least one status that allows it and there is no status that forbids it.
    Pls help me a.s.a.p. Thanks

    Hi,
    Go to t.code: KO02 and enter the internal order no and click on control data screen, here u required to change the status from CRTD to Release(by click on release button) and save the data, then u can able to post the transaction.
    Some times internal orders has been created but not released , if it is not released, system won't allow you to post any transaction by using this internal order.  If this internal order has been released, then u r able to post the document by using this internal order.
    all the best
    Prasad

  • Exit / badi for individual service line item detail with internal orders.

    Hello guys,
    <b>Issue 1.</b>as per our scenario we want to get the individual service line item details with Internal Orders.
    Please provide me any exit/badi with each item level with individual service line item Internal Orders.
    <b>Issue 2:</b> Remain same for issue 3 for blocking status. We want to delete item level for particular line what about the service rows which assigned in particular item.
    point will be rewarded for the suitabel answers.
    please give me response  ASAP.
    With Regards
    yogesh

    Hey Yogesh,
    I have the same scenario... Could you please drop a mail to [email protected] with the details of BADI and other details that you implemted for the same.
    Thanks a lot in advance.

Maybe you are looking for