Sales Order value updating in the Internal Order Revenue Planning

Dear All, 
We have created an Internal Order and entered the planned value of the Revenue & Costs.When we create the Sales Order ,the Planned Revenue value of the Internal Order is updating by the Sales Order Value,but as per the client requirement ,the planned value of the Internal Order should not get updated by the sales order value.
Please note that we have activated the CO-PA.Is this CO-PA activation is affecting the Internal Order planned values by the Sales Order value?.If so how to come from this issue.
Please help me as how to resolve this issue.
Regards
Subbu

Hi,
Thanks for giving the appropriate SAP Note and I have referred the said note,but in note the SAP has said that
"The attached modification deactivates the update for the order for all order categories (CO internal order, PM order, CS order)."
In our scenario we need to update the planned vales in the CO Internal Order ,PM Order and CS Order except the Sales Order value.Is there any other alternative solution without affecting the CO Internal Order,PM order and CS Order?
Please share as we are in the process of testing.
Thanks
Subbu

Similar Messages

  • Status of the Internal Orders

    Hi
    Is there a way to find out the status of the internal orders. Ie whether the internal orders are activated, created, locked etc..
    Please let me know the transaction code
    Thanks

    Dear Trishan,
    A report with T-code KOK5 may provide you required information. on the initial screen it will ask for selection variant.
    Create a selection variant there ( Using a selection variant you can store specific criteria you want to use in selecting your objects. This saves you having to enter the same data every time you start object selection.
    For selection variants you can use, for example, fields from the order master data, but also classification attributes, status selection profiles and activity grouping codes, amongst others.
    You define the selection variants in the Implementation Guide "overhead cost orders -> order master data -> Selection and collective processing -> define selection variants".)
    then after execution of report
    Under the "System Status" column status of the orders selected in the variant are shown. if the orders are locked then "LKD" or "Lock" will be appearing. 
    hope this may help you.

  • Sales order cost objective vs OKB9  Internal order cost object.

    Hi All,
    we facing an  issue with sales order cost objective vs OKB9 cost object.
    For IC PO service material, we assigned account assignment category 4.Reasonis Service material was not showing on G\R account.
    The G\L account 7898788, we assigned to Service Item (material type DIEN)  , for G\Cost 7898788 cost element is assigned in OKB9. Combination business + order 3478787.
    Now conflict with sales order cost objective vs OKB9  internal order cost object.
    While posting intercompany IR posting system thronging below error messageu2026
    Enter only one true account assignment
    Message no. KI249
    Diagnosis
    You made assignments to several objects in CO (cost center, order, project etc.). 2 of these have been created as true objects.
    System Response
    You are allowed only one account assignment for each cost-relevant account
    How to resolve this issue.. Do I make any config changes in the system to overcome this issue?
    Or any sub account to assin in VKOA config for internal orderu2026
    Regards,
    Adi

    Hi Waman,
    Thanks for your inputs.
    Issue :  IR failed to post for wax  Sales Order -> ICPO  - Error:  Enter only one true account assignmentu2019.
    Background:
    Original setup  in  Test system   & Productionu2013 account determination for servive (DIEN) account assignment category u20184u2019 was linked to G/L Account  34444444, As part of project orange u2019, account determination was linked to account u201889710100u2019.
    Account u20188970100u2019   34444444 was replaced with 8970100 ,is not linked to any cost center & always post with reference to IC Sales Order as per config in OKB9 based on company code (US99) + cost element (89701100) + business area (9yyy). This caused a conflict while posting IR, system could not determine exact order for posting financial value.
    Conflict:  Actual Sales Order 34789343 is  linked to PO via account assignment category & IC dummy sales order (8014331) is determine via config setting. Two cost objects cannot be linked to one IR G/L account booking.
    Regards,
    Adi

  • Purchase order to Asset non imposed the Internal Order.

    I'm entering a purchase order of an asset tied to an internal order of investment. The order has a budget X. If I enter a purchase order with value greater than the amount budgeted in the internal order, the system allows me to create the request and not imposed the internal order. In the report S_ALR_87013019, the order has no value released.
    How can the system do not allow the purchase of assets with values greater than estimated and how to make that encumbers the purchase order and appear in the report S_ALR_87013019?
    This only happens in the purchases of assets!
    Thanks in advanced!
    GLMacedo

    My friend, see my answer to witch point.
    1. Your Asset APC account should be Category 90 (Statistical) Cost element
    The Internal Order is Statistical (I see in KO03). Should I verify in another place?
    2. your Internal Order must be of category "Investment" and not "Overhead"
    OK
    3. Assign this Internal order in your Asset Master in the field "Investment Order"and not "Internal Order"....
    OK
    if Investment Order is not visible in Asset Master, change your screen layout of the asset and plug it in (IMG > AA > Master Data > Screen layouts)
    4. Do settings in T code ACSET - Allow EAUFN for Trn Type = *, Acct Assign Type = APC Postings, and check the Acct Assgn check box
    I don´t know how can I do this. How Can I Do?
    Allow commitment management in your contr area OKKP and in your Internal order type (KOT2_OPA)
    My type Order (investment) in KOT2_OPA is OK (commitment management was allowed). But in OKKP it is not! It is a critical setting. Should I flag this field?
    6. Feield Status Group of Asset must allow CO/PP Order in OBC4
    OK
    Thank you very much!

  • Issue While Executing the Internal Order in KO8G

    Hi,
    Whle executing the internal order in KO8G,I am getting the below error.
    Complete Allocation Structure A1   and Message no. KD503
    I have reversed/cancelled all the relevent Material documents related to that PO,even after i am getting the same error.
    Error is as follows-
    Complete allocation structure A1
    Message no. KD503
    Diagnosis
    During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters).
    Cost element 414126 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure A1, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
    Procedure
    Possible solutions are as follows:
    If the posting under cost element 414126 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
    If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
    a) You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose "Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure.
    If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement rule.
    You can update allocation structure A1
    Kindly advice me how to fix this error
    Thanks
    Supriya

    Hi,
    Thanks for your reply,I have added that cost element in allocation structure.Now i am getting one more error related to this even i have maintained Receiver type FXT and settlement cost element for that.Kindly help me on this.
    Define a settlement cost element for receiver type FXA
    Message no. KD506
    Diagnosis
    In allocation structure A1 (controlling area AFCO), you did not define which cost element should be used when settling costs/revenues of the sender. Nor did you define receiver type FXA.
    Procedure
    Assign a different allocation structure to the settlement sender (-> Master data -> Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters), or maintain allocation structure A1.
    Thanks
    Supriya

  • To find the Internal Order for a given opportunity

    Hi,
    Can anyone help me in finding out the internal order number for a list of opportunities? I need to know the tables in which this is getting updated.
    TIA,
    sinthu

    Hello,
    please read table CRMD_ORDERADM_H. According your "intenal order" you have to check on the field PROCESS_TYPE too.
    Rgds

  • INFO UPDATE in the purchase order ( ME21N)

    Why the field INFO UPDATE in the purchase order ( ME21N) is not flaged when I create a purchase order?
    I create a PO, and I flag it in ME21N, but it cancel it? WHY
    I have already tried it in spro Default values for purchasing, and all seem good!!
    Anybody could tell how can I tick this field?
    Thanks a lot
    Kari

    Hi
    Info update indictor can be set by defualt if you maintain the same in the Purchase inforecord,
    If no inforecord exists then this would not be flagged and if you flag it then the Purchase inforecord gets created with the update of with or wothout plant based on the default value assigned to the buyers.
    Thanks & Regards
    Kishore

  • Including down payment made to vendor in the internal order

    Hi all
    My requirement is like this.
    We use IM and IO(Capex orders) for procuring and capitalising assets. We are able to assign all the costs of procuring assets (both APC and incidental expenses to the internal order). We use purchase orders and assign the internal order while raising purchase order.
    Sometimes we do make Down payments(advances) without raising purchase orders. My question is how to include this down payment made in the internal order. We cannot assign any internal order while making the down payment. But, can we include this down payment made to vendor in the internal order(commitment) while making down payment or after that.
    FYI:I came to know that there is some functionality in Controlling (Project systems) where we can assign the down payment made to the internal order after making payment.But, i do not know how to do that.
    Pls somebody reply me.
    Thank you very much in advance.
    Regards,
    Vishnu
    VST-IT.
    Pls somebody answer my query.

    The functionality is available in Controlling. I dont know about PS.
    I need to know how to do it.
    Regards
    vishnu
    Pls anybody suggest me on this issue.

  • How to create a service order and check the internal order in R/3

    Required Solution:
    1. How to copy existing service order and create new one and check the internal order in R/3, whether the certain service order is correctly created in r/3, can you polease explain the steps plz.
    2. If i am creating service order by service template finally the service order is getting created but it is not showing me in the table iaom_crm_aufk, how to check this.
    can any one help me in this issues as soon as possible.

    Hello Zita,
    Try to restart your portal after creating <b>ServiceUser</b> in both UME and KM.
    One more major difference between ServiceUser and normal portal user is that a ServiceUser does not have a UserAccount (IUserAccount)
    Object serviceContext = null;
            try {
                serviceContext = AccessController.doPrivileged(new PrivilegedExceptionAction() {
                    public Object run() throws WcmException {
                        return ResourceFactory.getInstance().getServiceContext(CONTRACT_SERVICE_USER);
            } catch (PrivilegedActionException e) {
                logger.severe(e, "ResourceContext for the technical " + serviceUser +
                     " user could not be retrieved.");
    IResourceContext resCtx = (IResourceContext) serviceContext;
    So I modify all KM resources with this resCtx.
    Hope this helps ...
    Greetings,
    Praveen Gudapati
    p.s. Points are always welcome for helpful answers

  • GL account to  be changed so that the Internal Order field is mandatory

    Hello,
    We wand GL account to  be changed so that the Internal Order field is mandatory?  Nothing should be posted to this account without an Internal order and therefore, if this was a mandatory field people would be forced to put the Internal order # in up front rather than forgetting to add it in.
    The account is P&L account.
    Please let us know how to configure this?
    BR,
    Zulfikar

    Hi, other than setting the GL account as a cost element, you can assign a field status group that has internal order as a mandatory field.
    In spro, go to Financial accounting global setting > Document > Line item > Controls > Maintain Field Satus Variant.
    Select the Field status group that you want to change or you can copy any standard group and rename it as a new group. In the group, you will need to go to "Additional Account Assignment". Change CO/PP order to become "Required Entry".
    Hope this helps.
    Best Regards,
    Reverie

  • Advance payment against the Internal Orders - Capex

    Dear friends
    Can you please explain what configuration we have to do regarding the Down payment made against the Internal Orders created for Capital Expenditure.
    Please let me know what cost element category we have to take for Down Payments made against the Internal Orders.
    Please let me know in detail manner.
    Thanks in Advance
    Kiran A

    -

  • Read the Internal Order GUID of the Batch

    Hi,
      In Product view, Reciept/Req element is showing one element 0000653225/0001/CC/(01.01.1970). If we go to context option, It is showing the Pegging structure.
    I am working on one report in which User enter the number 0000653225 and Output comes in the form of the Pegging structure.
    I am not getting the Internal Order number of 0000653225 usinf the function module '/SAPAPO/DM_ORDKEY_SELECT_ORDNO'. While this Function module returns the Internal Order GUID of all other Reciept/Req elements.
      Appreciate If anyone help me on getting the above.
    Thanks in Advance
    Pradeep

    Hi,
      I can see the Order in the Product view...it meant it exist in the system. But in the tables /sapapo/ordkey & /sapapo/ordmap, No order is pouplated wiith the Order type '00'.
    I guess we have to read this order in another way. But I don't know.
    Thanks
    Pradeep

  • Plan/budget profile to the Internal order.

    where do we assign Plan/budget profile to the Internal order.
    Thnks
    jabeen

    Hi
           Please ensure whether your order type is assigned to the budgeted profile. Follow the following path:
    Controlling-Internal Order-Budget and Availaibility Control-Maintain Budget Profile(T Code KOAB)
    -->Maintain Budget Profile 
    Regards

  • GET THE INTERNAL ORDER NUMBER BY INTERNAL ORDER GROUP

    Hi everyone! I want to know if there's existing functional module whereas I can get a list of internal order number (AUFNR) based from the internal order group name (AUFGR)? Thanks a lot! Your response will be greatly appreciated!

    Hi,
       First take a look at K_ORDER_SET_CREATE fm..
       The following code may help you in getting the orders based on order group..
      DATA: t_setvalues LIKE SETVALUES
            OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE,
            t_hierarchy LIKE SETHIER OCCURS 0
            WITH HEADER LINE,
            l_date_from LIKE sy-datum,
            l_date_to LIKE sy-datum,
            l_subrc LIKE sy-subrc,
            l_setid LIKE SETHIER-SETID,
            BEGIN OF t_aufnr OCCURS 0,
              aufnr TYPE aufnr,
            END OF t_aufnr.
      CALL FUNCTION 'G_SET_ENCRYPT_SETID'
           EXPORTING
                SETCLASS        =  '0103'
                SHORTNAME       =  l_aufgr   <Your Aufgr here>
           IMPORTING
                SETID           =  l_setid.
      CALL FUNCTION 'G_SET_AVAILABLE'
           EXPORTING
                SETNAME = l_setid
                TABLE   = 'CCSS'
           IMPORTING
                SUBRC   = l_subrc.
      CALL FUNCTION 'G_SET_TREE_IMPORT'
           EXPORTING
                CLIENT                  = sy-mandt
                SETID                   = l_setid
                TABNAME                 = 'CCSS'
                fieldname               = 'AUFNR'      
                NO_DESCRIPTIONS         = space
                NO_RW_INFO              = space
                date_from               = l_date_from 
                date_to                 = l_date_to    
           TABLES
                SET_HIERARCHY           = t_hierarchy
                SET_VALUES              = t_setvalues
           EXCEPTIONS
                SET_NOT_FOUND           = 1
                OTHERS                  = 3.
       LOOP AT t_setvalues.
         t_aufnr-aufnr = t_setvalues-from.
         COLLECT t_aufnr.
         t_aufnr-aufnr = t_setvalues-to.
         COLLECT t_aufnr.
       ENDLOOP.
    Sri
    Message was edited by: Srikanth Pinnamaneni

  • How to change the internal order type when it has been created?

    There is an internal order, when it being created, the user chose the incorrect order type and save it. but the internal order number is useful. so we just want to change the order type or delete the order to release the number.  so can you give me some solutions to solve it. I can not find the way neither change the order type nor delete it.  thanks very much.

    You are unable to change the internal order type once an internal order has been created, however you can delete the IO if there haven't been any postings made.
    In change mode (tcode KO02), go into the internal order.  Go into the following menu:  Edit > Deletion Flag > Set.    Before you exit the IO, save the master record.
    Depending upon your archiving settings, you should then be able to select the menu path:  Edit > Set Deletion Indicator.
    If the IO isn't deleted, you can "clobber" it by going into the IMG and deleting the IO using the function "Delete Test Data".  This should only be done by a technical person to ensure that a mass-delete doesn't occur.
    Please note that if the IO was an internally assigned number, you might just want to block it and re-use it later.
    Hope this helps.
    Kylie

Maybe you are looking for