Sales tax data in the posting term is not consistent (Real Estate Contract)

Hi Experts ,
getting the following error in while creating a "Rental Contract" through the T. Code RECN while trying to enter data in the " Conditions" tab page of the contract . Have made all the entries in in the Posting Parameters tab ( e.g. Payment Method ,House Bank ,House Bank Acct ,Bank Details ,Tax Type ,Tax Group) but still getting this error
ERROR MESSAGE
Sales tax data in the posting term is not consistent
Message no. RECD076
Diagnosis
The sales tax data in the posting term is inconsistent.
Procedure
Switch to maintenance of posting terms and correct all errors that are shown there.
Please help ....

Hi Ananda.
What did you do to resolved this problem?
Could you help?
Tks
Lucas

Similar Messages

Sales tax data in the posting term is not consistent (Error in Real Estate)

The following error is occured while creating a real estate contract.
Sales tax data in the posting term is not consistent
Message no. RECD076
Diagnosis
The sales tax data in the posting term is inconsistent.
Procedure
Switch to maintenance of posting terms and correct all errors that are shown there.

Hi Ananda.
What did you do to resolved this problem?
Could you help?
Tks
Lucas

Sales tax data in the posting term is not complete

Hi
i did the customisation for for new condition type and contract in configration
but the problem is while creating the contract in recn based on the new contract type and condition type i got the error like
Sales tax data in the posting term is not complete
can anyone give any suggestions on this.

Hi Franz.
The error continues.
Sales tax code not found for company code 7000 IC0 GRP.IMPOSTO SIA 01.01.2010
Message no. REEXFI000
Follow my customizing:
- Integration FI-GL, FI-AR, FI-AP - Taxes
- Assign Tax Codes
Country       tax type               tax group                         valid from       tax code
BR     IC0     GRP.IMPOSTO SIA     10.06.2010           B0
I have not found the parameter "Company"
Next configuration:
- Integration FI-GL, FI-AR, FI-AP - Taxes
- Assign Tax Code (for FI Document)
Country        tax code        valid from         valid to        tax type          tax group
BR     B0     01.01.2010     31.12.2010         IC0     GRP.IMPOSTO SIA
You think you have more configurations to be made?
Tks
Lucas

I want tp know how to setup tabs in a form like one below one that has never been filled out other words fill in one line a hit enter go the next line which may be to the left are down this is real estate contract

month _________ day __________ year__________
lising firm ________________________
sign ________________
printed name_________________________
buyer name ____________________
sellers name_____________________
you get the idea I am using adobe acrobat x pro

Jneklason wrote:
~snip~
I know this email is confusing and really hard to understand...perhaps now you will know how i've been feeling--lost and confused with all the mis-information, with a hit and miss phone, and out of time with all the 1 1/2 hr to 2 hrs EACH wasted on this issue.
On top of all this, I can't even find out how to file a complaint with anyone higher up than Customer Service.
I hate to tell you this, but you didn't write an email. You wrote a discussion post on the Verizon Wireless Community forum which is a public peer to peer forum. Unfortunately since you didn't mark your post as a question, the VZW reps that roam this community won't ever see your post. Before you re-post it, don't. Duplicate posts get removed from the community.
I see there were several missteps both by the reps and yourself in your post. First you should have insisted on returning the phone within the 14 day return policy period. Second which Samsung Galaxy mini model did you purchase? The S3 mini or the S4 mini? Did you do any research prior to deciding on this device. The reps at that time deflected the easiest course of action, by trying to get you to replace the phone under insurance instead of returning the phone. The Early Edge payment option requires the current phone on the line using the early Edge must be returned to Verizon Wireless. Did you once considered going to a third party site like Swappa to purchase a gently used device for your daughter?

Sales tax data do not define output tax

Dear Experts,
I am creating contract and getting following error 'Sales tax data do not define output tax' in SAP REFX contract
I have done the following
define tax types
define tax groups
define tax codes
Assign tax code to tax type and group
Assignment of tax transactions key
Assign country to calculation procedure
Have i missed something? If you see the contract the tax rate 10% is getting picked Please help
Thanks Regards
yezdevan

Hi Vasudevan,
Check the following checklist and try.
1. For tax code used, check for percentage value maintenance for the relevant condition type in transaction FV13, if maintained check for date validity and deletion indicators.
2. Tax code should be assigned to company code at: Logistics - General -> Tax on Goods Movements -> India -> Basic Settings -> Determination of Excise Duty -> Condition-Based Excise Determination -> Assign Tax Code to Company Codes.
3. The condition type used to maintain the tax code, as seen in FTXP. should have MVST or MWST as the access sequence in OBYZ settings, based on input or output tax respectively.
Hope this resolves the issue.
Best Regards,
Hardik Sharma

Whether we can able to save the data in the portal side or not?

Hi All,
Could anyone please tell me, whether we can able to save the data in the portal side or not, if possible can you please explain the procedure.
Thanks in advance,
Siva.

If you are familiar with java then you can use the usual jdbc / odbc driver to connect. Do search the forums, this has already been discussed many times before, if you encounter a road block do post back.....
You can also refer to this blog, though it talks about CE 7.1 the concepts remain the same, the configuration screens might differ - Connecting an Application to an External Database in SAP NW CE 7.1
Did some searhing for you refer these also
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/70929198-0d36-2b10-04b8-84d90fa3df9c&overridelayout=true
How can I set the data binding between Web Dynpro & Database table
Connect to External Oracle Database
Urgent : Hoe to connect to a ORACLE database throught WEBDYNPRO JAVA <-- good one
Thanks,
GLM
Edited by: GLM on Aug 18, 2009 11:38 AM
Edited by: GLM on Aug 18, 2009 11:41 AM

The payment terms are not getting reflected in PO

Hi,
We are in SRM5.0 Extended Classic scenario.
We have created new payment term in ECC and transferred to SRM using BBP_UPLOAD_PAYMENT_TERMS and after tranferring it to SRM I am able to see the new payment term in table BBP_PAYTERM and BBP_PAYTERM_TEXT in SRM system.
But non of the payment terms are not reflecting into PO. We are not getting any errors while processing the PO.
Could you please suggest what may be the issue here.
Best Regards,
Siddappa

Hello Siddappa,
I am a little confused here with the scenario.
I understand that the payment terms are recenly created and replicated. So naturally they would have been updated in the relevant vendor master as well. Now has the vendor master been replicated to SRM from ECC once the payment terms were updated.
So from what you have mentioned "When we check the BBP_PD, the payment term is reflecting for the POs created after shopping cart approval."
So does this mean once the SC is approved then the PO is created and then the Terms of Payment are seen in the PO.
However "If the PO created through describe requirement, the Vendor will not assigned the PO created will go to Held status and buyer will process the order."
So does this mean since the Vendor is not mentioned the Terms of Payment is not being reflected and will happen only once the same is specified in the PO.
I have a question on whether after replicating the Payment Terms, has it been seen in any of the PO's created so far or it is always blank.
Regards
Pramod

The data from the infoprovider involved could not be checked'

Hi all,
In the the selection screen of the virtual provider through the option display data, am getting message text " the data from the infoprovider involved could not be checked" , and then it brings all the data from the r/3 function module irrespective of the selection by date in the virtual info provider. I am retrieving the data from r/3 function module(RFC) to bw function module assign to virtual infoprovider.
with regards,
Ram

Hi
A Virtual Provider does not store data. to view the data in it you will have to use it in a query and check its data.
Thanks,
Rajesh.
Please provide points to answers if you find them helpful

Good evening. I rebuilt my aypad. writes enter apple id. password to the post office is not selling what to do

good evening. I rebuilt my aypad. writes enter apple id. password to the post office is not selling what to do

If you are trying to activate an iPad or iPhone and it is asking for the original owners Apple ID and password, you have encountered the Activation Lock. This is a security feature that prevents thieves from setting up and using a stolen or lost iPad or iPhone. You have no alternative. No must contact the original owner to get permission to use the device. If you cannot contact the original owner return the device to where you bought it and get a refund. You will never be able to activate the device and no one can help you do it.

Error while uploading the Real Estate Contract using IDOC & BAPI

Hi All ,
I am trying to uploading the real estate contract data by using LSMW IDOC & BAPI methods .
In IDOC method I have used the Basic type as BUS1505_CREATE01 and Message type as BUS1505_CREATE. I have passed all mandatory fields then also i am unable to create the CONTRACT but and i am able to create CONTRACT using the bapi BAPI_RE_CN_CREATE by passing the values in SE37 and i am able create CONTRACT manually in transaction code RECN . Can any body know the reason .
In BAPI method I have used the Business Object BUS1505 ,Method CREATE ,Message type BUS1505_CREATE and Basic type BUS1505_CREATE03 . I have passed all the mandatory fields then also i am unable create the CONTRACT But with the same fields i am able create CONTRACT manually in transaction code RECN and i am able to create CONTRACT using the bapi BAPI_RE_CN_CREATE by passing the values in SE37 .
Regards
Srihari

Hi All,
I was passing blank entries so the above errors were coming. I removed those blank entries and now Im getting error like .
"Individual renewal rule does not contain any extension periods"
"No instance of object type ContractREFX has been created. External reference: REC <NEW>'.

After REFRESH the cached object is not consistent with the database table

After REFRESH, the cached object is not consistent with the database table. Why?
I created a JDBC connection with the Oracle database (HR schema) using JDeveloper(10.1.3) and then I created an offline database (HR schema)
in JDeveloper from the existing database tables (HR schema). Then I made some updates to the JOBS database table using SQL*Plus.
Then I returned to the JDeveloper tool and refreshed the HR connection. But I found no any changes made to the offline database table JOBS in
JDeveloper.
How to make the JDeveloper's offline tables to be synchronized with the underling database tables?

qkc,
Once you create an offline table, it's just a copy of a table definition as of the point in time you brought it in from the database. Refreshing the connection, as you describe it, just refreshes the database browser, and not any offline objects. If you want to syncrhnonize the offline table, right-click the offline table and choose "Generate or Reconcile Objects" to reconcile the object to the database. I just tried this in 10.1.3.3 (not the latest 10.1.3, I know), and it works properly.
John

RE-FX user/offerer at the real estate contract

Hi!
Does anybody know is there possibility in RE-FX to define in one real estate contract (wich is set as, for example, a RE-FX User`s contract - in other words, Customer`s contract) two partner roles to treat them in follow-on processes as a Vendor and as a Customer as well? That`s needed for the purpose to attach two different contractors for one real estate contract.
Seeking for your advice,
Victoria

Hi,
SPRO -> Flexible Real estate Management (RF-FX) ->Correspondence->
PDF based forms->Forms -> define forms.
Use the Tcode SFP to build the Forms. not from SE71 like what we use for other SD and MM forms.
I think there is no need of assignment with the program, as I don't find any assignment in SPRO settings.
So modify the form and keep the standard form there in the SPRO settings.
Close the thread if your question is answered.
Thanks
Nayan

How to get the tax data for the material in the Sales:sales org.1 view 1?

as the title,many thanks!

Hi,
the TAX details are stored in table TSKM ---> Material Taxes
You can find field TAKLV ---> Tax classification of the material in MARA table .
You need to link MARA-TAKLV and TSKM-TAXKM field .
Best regards,
raam

Debit memo(DR doc type) baseline date exceding the payment term days

Hi All
For debit memo I am facing a issue where my baseline date for a customer is showing more then the days specified in his(customer's) payment terms.
sales document category is DR and order is created for some customer xyz and payment terms of that customer is showing 0% UP TO 15 DAYS. But when I check it in FBL5n the Net due dt for that order is showing 180 + 15 = 195days.
What can be the reason, is it due to some enhancement or some routine or what , I am not able to figure out from where these days are coming for. I have checked MV45AFZZ , RV60AFZA and other exit s, I couldnt find any code which shows these added 180 days..
Guide me in finding out the source ot this, <removed by moderator>.
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Amit
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Sep 30, 2011 3:46 PM

HI,
You may need to check the copy control settings between the debit memo request and sales document in transaction code VTAA.
Select the target document type and source document type, and click on the details (header level). Check the routine that is assigned for the field copying requirements for transfering business data.
The routine assigned may be copying the base line date from the source document. You may need to assign other routine or you may need to develop your own routine to resolve your issue.
Regards,

Invoice: Baseline date on the payment terms.

Dear Experts,
I am having a problem where trying to change the term of payment of an invoice before a posting, the account doesnt set the baseline date correctly.
This issue occurs for baseline date type 'Entry Date' .
After whichever interaction in MIR4 , 'Enter' or 'Save', the baseline date will:
1. set to the date as in the existing entry if there is no change .
2. set to the system date if there is a change in the payment terms,
where the '2nd' is not correct because the payment term changed stated that the baseline date should be 'Entry Date'.
The above mentioned logic is inside the function module
'FI_CHANGE_PAYMENT_CONDITIONS'
Codes bellow shows the scenario mentioned in '1.' no changes
Wenn keine Änderung, dann Export versorgen und Tschüss-----
e_zterm = i_newzterm.
zterm = i_newzterm.
e_zfbdt = i_newzfbdt. <----
set to the existing entry
zfbdt = i_newzfbdt.
e_sklin = i_newsklin.
sklin = i_newsklin.
check not status is initial.
Codes bellow shows the scenario mentioned in '2.'terms change, and baseline date type 'C'
T052 contains first entry for payment term key entered "P00K005354
case t052-zdart. "P00K005354
when 'C'. "P00K005354
zfbdt = sy-datum. "P00K005354
if i_cpudt is initial. "Note 199967
zfbdt = sy-datum. "P00K005354 <------ set to current date
else. "Note 199967
zfbdt = i_cpudt. "Note 199967
endif. "Note 199967
Is this a program logic error or is it the way it should be ?
Any one encounter the similar problem ? or should there be OSS notes to apply ?
Thank you .....

.

Sales tax data in the posting term is not consistent (Real Estate Contract)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for