Same doubts about the migration.

If I migrate osOSX to OS X Mountain Lion I´ll lost my programs and site configurations (apache configs)?
I have many websites configured, and programs... I´ll have install programs again?
Thanks.

No you shouldn't lose anything. No need to migrate the ML install will bring all your apps along.
But check for compatibility...
http://roaringapps.com/apps:table

Similar Messages

Doubt about the sizing in the CPH

Hi gurus!
I have the following doubt about the sizing in the CPH. I'm going to implement the CCMS BI CONTENT, i read the Note 979581 - Installing and configuring the CCMS BI Content, but in the document called "IT Performance Reporting Using SAP NetWeaver Business Intelligence" you can see images in this link:
http://www.servidor-imagenes.com/show-image.php?id=050236bd91654e16c94a559350611dff
here said how I can calculate the sizing based in Data Record Size per each Metric stored, but in specific, about the example: 20 systems, 17 CPH metrics. are included SCM, BI, ECC, SOLMAN in this 20 systems? And about the 17 CPH Metrics is talking about ratios? what's mean the CPH metrics?, How can I know what is my CPH metrics?
I hope can help me
Best Regards
Ramon Sanchez

this theme has been closed on our enterprise

You'll see the same complaints about the iPhone WiFi

You'll see the same complaints about the iPhone WiFi as we're seeing against the iPad WiFi.
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1648395&tstart=0
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2099965&tstart=0
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2393075&tstart=15
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2381929&tstart=30
There are tons of complaints about the WiFi interface on the iPhone, with errors and problems similar to what you're seeing on the iPad.
Chris Shaker

As a retired network device driver writer, I realize that the same device driver is probably running on both platforms. So more than likely, you'll see the same bugs on both platforms. Unless we're dealing with a hardware issue.
I would guess that the iPhone/iPad losing it's WiFi password issue is a software bug.
Chris Shaker

Doubt about the distribution system

I have a doubt about the distribution system.
We have made a publication and download it and have it in our iPad. The client does not want tosell or that anyone other than its 15 commercial rest her ipad. How can we host it in those 15ipads?, Do I need any of the subscription programs adobe?
Thanks!

function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}Matthew Laun wrote:
Yeah... Someone did that yesterday with 70-something users all trying to get the updated folio at once, and it caused server outages. I've got a feeling we may modify the user agreement to limit this. Not saying for sure, just a word of caution.
Matthew
I don't understand this reply at all. Many of us have been using acrobat.com in exactly this fashion, and I've posted about it many times; including a full review:
http://forums.adobe.com/message/3853106#3853106
Did Adobe not see this coming? How would you limit the download amount without gutting the functionality? Would this apply to paid acrobat.com accounts as well?
I'm about to upgrade my acrobat.com account this week to host more than 1 folio. You need to clarify what you mean by 'modify the user agreement' ASAP.

Doubts about the advantages and disadvantages of BEx Analyzer

Hi people!
Do you know in specific. What are the advantages and disadvantages of BEx Analyzer?
and Do you know the limitations and scope of the bex analyzer?
Talking about the security issue. What kind of resticciones be applied to end-users to control information. Protecting system
resources and the information that the user uses, not be manipulated.
I hope you could answer my doubts
Ramon
Thanks

Hi!
The standard BEx BI 3.x tools, is no longer available with the SAP NetWeaver 7.0 BI tools; however, it is part of the SAP BI add-on installation that, by default, will install the BW 3.x tools along with the newer BI 7.0 tools.
We want to prevent unauthorized download of data to excel sheets from users who have installed bex analyzer but are not authorized to do that. Certain users only have to access querys from web and shouldn't have to use reports from bex analyzer.
The only accepted way to access reports for all users is by using web querys published in our intranet. But many users have bex analyzer installed and we don't want that an unauthorized user download data to a excel sheet via bex analyzer.
I'm testing with one user with this roles, but bex web template and bex analyzer have similiar object authorizations, and i don't know if is possible prevent unauthorized download of data from excel sheets.
Final users don't access to bex analyzer by rrmx transaction
Until know i'm testing with this user roles:
1. ZBW:BEX_WEB:RFC (for web templates)
S_RFC:
ACTVT: 16
RFC_NAME:
RFC1
RSBOLAP_BICS
RSBOLAP_BICS_CONSUMER
RSBOLAP_BICS_PROVIDER
RSBOLAP_BICS_PROVIDER_VAR
RSOBJS_RFC_INTERFACE
RSRCI_LOCAL_VIEW
RSWRTEMPLATE
SDIFRUNTIME
SYST
RFC_TYPE: FUGR
2. ZBW:BEX:RFC (for Bex Analyzer):
ACTVT: 16
RFC_NAME:
RSOBJS_RFC_INTERFACE
RSR_XLS_RFC
RZX0
SDIFRUNTIME
SM02
SUNI
SYST
RFC_TYPE: FUGR
please take in count this points:
1. Prevent unauthorized download of data to excel sheets from users that should have accees only querys from web not bex analyzer (very important this point)=
2. what are the disadvantages of BEx Analyzer, if only if limited by excel...from other point like performance, workprocess with long runtimes, memory issues, for said something.
I don't know if i'm going by good way.
Somebody could help me?
Ramon

Doubt about the settlement rule of the Production ORder

The only default distribution rule allowed for a PP order is PP1 or PP2. We would need to change that to allow settlement to multiple receivers as a default. If that is the case, we may want to look into a user exit to update the settlement rule during production order creation instead so that the G/L account is correct from the beginning.
Currently when we create the production order, the settlement rule will default the below, I am not sure if a user exit is able to maintain the Source as 200 (Materials)?
If yes, we can then add the second rule for Source 100 (Labor and Mfg) via the user exit as well.
In this case, SAP will not prompt us error of settlement with 200%, as they are from difference Sources.
now anybody can explain me about the User EXit we have to correct this

any help on this.. please its very urgent
thanks in advance

Slight doubt about the downloading shown on Launchpad mac.

hello folks!
I have been worried about the downloading process shown in launchpad's first page is happening instead of second page like in lion! is it happening to you people too?

It is in the first page.
# 8
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5548

I have a doubt about The Single-Thread Rule

The [url http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/uiswing/overview/threads.html#rule]Single Thread Rule states:
Rule: Once a Swing component has been realized, all code that might affect or depend on the state of that component should be executed in the event-dispatching thread.
I began to wonder about this because so much code seems to work just fine when it isn't executed in the event dispatching thread. Why are there exceptions? I went looking for some code which acted differently when executed on the event thread than when it was not. I found this
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jsp?forum=57&thread=410423&message=1803725#1803725
Now I started wondering why this was the case. What I found was that DefaultCaret adds a document listener to the document of the JTextComponent. In this listener, the insertUpdate() method specifically tests if it is running on the event dispatch thread and if it is, it updates the caret position.public void insertUpdate(DocumentEvent e) {
    if (async || SwingUtilities.isEventDispatchThread()) {
        // ... update the caret position ...
}I then copied the code from DefaultCaret and made a MyCaret. I needed to tweek the code a little bit, but it ran. I removed the event thread test. It worked outside the event thread. There was a small difference in the results though. The textarea did not scroll all the way to the bottom. Almost, but not quite. I didn't test enough to make sure this was the only problem, but there was at least one problem.
Now I started think about why this would be. The thought crossed my mind that the order of the events which were posted to the event queue were probably important. Sun found bugs when components were updated out of the event thread, so they essentially ignored events which weren't on the event thread and created the The Single-Thread Rule.
A few days pass. I'm starting to wonder if Sun could have done a better job making Swing components thread safe. I also don't know that this specific case I found was the rule or the exception to the rule. But without insight into the design philosopy of Swing, I would have to examine all their components and see how they have written them and see if I can come up with a better design. That sound like a lot of work. Especially without getting paid for it.
But wait a second, all you have to do is call the append() method of JTextArea on the event thread. If that is the case, why didn't they write the freakin component that way? Well, I'll try itclass MyTextArea extends JTextArea {
public MyTextArea(int rows, int columns) { super(rows,columns); }
public void append(final String text) {
    if (SwingUtilities.isEventDispatchThread()) super.append(text);
    else {
      SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
        public void run() { myAppend(text); }
private void myAppend(String text) { super.append(text); }
}I change [url http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jsp?forum=57&thread=410423&message=1803725#1803725]camickr's code to use a MyTextArea and it works fine without calling from the event thread. I've essentially moved The Single-Thread Rule to the component itself rather than relying on each and every one of the [url http://www.aboutlegacycoding.com/default.htm?AURL=%2FSurveys%2FSurvey6intro%2Easp]2.5 million Java programmers worldwide to use SwingUtilities.invaokeLater().
Now for my question...
Why didn't Sun do this?

Swing is slow enough as it is. Lets not make it slower
just
because dense "programmers" don't know what they are
doing.I agree with you in defending the current model, but aren't you a bit harsh there?!? ;-)
Well, there are a number of not-so-dense programmers that expect such high-level components to be thread-safe. The question is worth asking whether Sun intentionally favor the explicit thread management for performance reasons, or whether this was an oversight.
I'd go for the former (intentional) : indeed any GUI toolkit is inherently thread-based; there is always a distinction between the graphical thread(s) and the application threads - and the programmer always has to manage explicit thread creation to handle long-running event handlers without blocking the event dispatching thread. Extending thread concerns to the updating of components is therefore not a big move.
So it seems fair that a core GUI toolkit does not hide thread issues (though to the best of my knowledge there is no such limitation in updating AWT components), or at least that's what Sun deemed.
An ease-of-use-focused toolkit wrapping the core toolkit for thread-safety can be provided as a third-party product. Though I agree that wrapping the dozens of existing widgets and hundreds of methods is cumbersome - and the lack of such products probably shows it would have a low added value to trained developpers.
Because your way is an extra method call and if
statement, neither of which is necessary if you already know you
are in the correct thread. Now count the number of methods
which will need to be changed (and add up the extra cost).Indeed it's quite common to update several properties of several widgets in one bulk (when user clicks "OK", add a row to the table, change the title of the window, update status bar, re-enable all buttons, change some color,...).
In this case explicit thread management doesn't spare one if but a dozen of redundant ifs!
Note that there could have been if-less ways to cope for thread safety, such as creating a copy of the component's model when a change is made to a component, and switching the model only before paint() is called in the event-dispatching - of course coalescing all changes into the same "updated" model until paint() is called.
But this would trade ease of use for redundant memory consumption, especially for some components with potentially huge models (JTree, JTable, JTextArea,...). And Swing appears to be already quite memory-greedy!

Doubt about the concept of HashSet and LinkedHashSet

I read one of the SCJP 6 exam book, when talking about Set, it gives one definition:
When using HashSet or LinkedHashSet, the objects you add to them must override hashCode(). If they don't override hashCode(), the default Object. hashCode() method will allow multiple objects that you might consider "meaningfully equal" to be added to your "no duplicates allowed" set.
What I am getting confused is that IF the objects we add to them must override hashCode(), we must override equals() method also! Isn't it?
Edited by: roamer on 2009?10?23? ??10:29

jverd wrote:
endasil wrote:
When using HashSet or LinkedHashSet, the objects you add to them must override hashCode(). If they don't override hashCode(), the default Object. hashCode() method will allow multiple objects that you might consider "meaningfully equal" to be added to your "no duplicates allowed" set.This really is completely wrong. Duplicates being added to your set has nothing to do with not overriding hashCode, and everything to do with not overriding equals. No, if you override equals but not hashCode, you can get dupes. That is, two items that your equals method says are equal can make it into the Set.Sorry, to clarify, what I meant by that was that to avoid duplicates of meaningfully equal objects, you must override equals, and overriding hashCode is just a consequent of overriding equals (to maintain the equal objects have equal hashcodes invariant). Overriding hashCode alone will not, and cannot, prevent meaningfully equal duplicates if you don't first define meaningfully equal by overriding equals.
In summary, it's wrong because
1) You don't have to override hashCode() if you don't override equals (or rather, don't deviate from the default "two objects are equal if and only if they are the same object").
2) If you have any other definition of meaningfully equal that you want enforced in a Set, you must override equals to correspond to that definition.
3) If you override equals, you must override hashCode by the contract of hashCode and equals.
That's why I was saying that the statement was completely wrong. It's taking a backwards approach.
By not overriding equals, you're saying that no two separate instances can be meaningfully equal, so the default hashCode is fine. Yeah, I kind of figured for the statement to be meaningful, it is assumed that you have already overridden equals. Otherwise what's the point of even mentioning something two objects "meaningfully equal"?All this talk of "meaningfully equal" makes me think the opposite: that they haven't overridden equals, or haven't discussed it yet. Otherwise you could just say that the objects are equal, or are equal according to equals().
I would question the authority of the source that said that.I would quesiton the source's ability to express himself clearly. :-)Yeah, maybe that's all it is. In that case, I suggest (to the OP) reading [Effective Java, Chapter 3|http://java.sun.com/developer/Books/effectivejava/Chapter3.pdf]. Best source I've seen for beginners to make sense of all this.
Edited by: endasil on 26-Oct-2009 1:11 PM

Doubt About the .TPZ File Importing

Hi Experts,
Here We have Completed PI 7.0 Installation.
We Imported XI3_0_SAP_BASIS_6.40_12_00.tpz in to IR Instead of XI7_0_SAP_BASIS_7.00_06_00.tpz.
Q1) How to Remove the Old BASIS .TPZ File ??????????
Q2) From Where we Can Remove it ?????
Q3) With Out Remove that Old File, Can we Import the New BASIS .TPZ File, Is It Corret ????
Q4) Existing these Two BASIS .TPZ Files in IR Is there Any Problem ???
Please Help Me
Regards
Khanna

Hi,
>><i> Q1) How to Remove the Old BASIS .TPZ File ??????????</i>
GO TO -> usr\sap\<SID>\SYS\global\xi\repository_server\import\importedfiles\ to remove
>><i>From Where we Can Remove it ?????</i>
from the same above path you can remove it
Regards,
Ramesh P

One last doubt about the Verification Required message when trying to download anything.

Hello guys, so this is the thing.
Like a lot of people here I'm getting the annoying message "Verification Required: Before you can make purchases, you must tap Continue to sign in, then verify your payment info". OK right now my son is using my iPad and I setted my credit card payment info to None, so he can't purchase anything. He's just trying to install free apps like messengers, alarms, free games and other free stuff, but so far he only installed Yahoo Messenger, which is a free app like everybody knows. However we haven't be able to download anything else because that message which prevents to download anything. Also I'm in a new address and can't update my personal data because I have selected the None option in credit cards.
So this is my doubt: If I checked None, it's suppossed I can't pay for anything, which is good to me right now because my son is ussing my iPad so, why I can't even download the free ones? I mean that's not logical to me.
Why I can't navigate through the App Store getting free apps without this annoying message which prevents me to install even free apps?
I just don't understand it.
I hope anyone can help me.
Best regards.

Try 3 things -
1. Double tap on the Home button, scroll through the appas until you get to the Apps Store one, press on it until the minus sign appears on it and then press of the minus sign. Go back to your Home page, selec the Apps store nd try again.
2. Do a Reset [Hold the Home and Sleep/Wake buttons down together for 10 seconds or so (until the Apple logo appears) and then release. When the screen goes blank power On again in the normal way.] It is absolutely/appsolutely safe!
3. Delete your card details in your Account details and try again.

Need detail about the migration of folder_g to frameworkfolders

Hi
How to migrate the data from folder_g to frameworkfolders in UCM 11g ? Is there any tool exist ?

Hi Sankar ,
First and foremost the contents and folders that are created in Folders_g in PS4 has to be migrated as is to a PS5 instance (where folders_g is installed) . After that under Folder (Framework folder) administration there is a migration utility which willl move the set of contents from Folders_g to Folders .
Details are available as KM article on MoS portal and as documentation link :http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23943_01/doc.1111/e10792/c08_migration.htm#CJHBCDGJ
Hope this helps .
Thanks
Srinath

Doubt about the PB's fans

I recently instaled this widget called iStat pro which shows the laptop's temperature in different locations such as CPU, Battery and power supply, right now the temperature for some of these locations is 54, 57 the battery is the lowest at 35degrees this widget also shows me if the fans are on or not, right now with the temperatures i just wrote they are off.
At what temperature do the fans start to work?
-Thanks

Hi JGAmac,
I recently posted concerning the same issue, see "fans not working", for now I totally agree with the answer from Ned Snowing, we should consider us one of the lucky once.
I installed temperature monitor, the iStat pro widget and a temperature widget by Marcel Bresink. For now I dont trust the iStat pro widget to much, it never shows my fans are on, but after doing a complete re-install, reset PRAM and PMU, there is little else we can do, to my knowledge. My temperature never goes above 64°C recently I did a NVRAM reset and now it seems to stay under 58°C. I am currently in Asia where daily averages reach 35° and without airco. So I also have problems to keep my keyboard dry.

E-Recruiting 604 Doubt about the planning of the background job.

Hi,
We are on E-Rec 604 with seperated standlone e-rec system.
I did the initial transfer of the Org Management data through PFAL from ECC to E-Recruit and all were ok.
Now I have to planed the job for the future changes.
This is my doubt, I just have to plan the program RBDMIDOC in the HR system, or should I add something more?.
Please somebody could guide me?.
Thanks a lot,
Esther

Hello Esther,
there are some more configuration steps for the regular update after the initial load.
Probably already done by you is the activation of the change pointers for the message type otherwise RBDMIDOC won't create any IDoc.
Additional settings to the ALE you should apply to the system:
- In the e-recruiting system, go to the partner profile settings for the ALE. Open the inbound parameters for the message type and switch radio button in the "process by function module" section from trigger immediatly to trigger by background program.
- Create a variant for report RBDAPP01 on the e-rec system setting the package size to 1
- Plan the report RBDAPP01 as job on the e-recruiting system to process the incomming IDocs
Ensure in the job scheduling of RBDMIDOC and RBDAPP01 that both are running before midnight and the RBDMIDOC is running before RBDAPP01 of course.
Additional E-Recruiting settings you have to do:
- schedule HRALXSYNC on the e-rec system as daily job
- Ensure that the e-rec periodical service PROCESS_CAND_STATUS_CHANGE (class CL_HRRCF_UPDATE_P_STAT) is activated in the e-rec customizing under E-Recruiting -> Technical Settings -> Periodical Services
Best Regards
Roman

Doubt about the javadoc

I guess I've found an error in the javadoc for oracle jdbc driver...
http://www.oracle.com/technology/docs/tech/java/sqlj_jdbc/doc_library/javadoc/oracle.jdbc.driver.oracleconnection.html
the comment for the method close says:
"public synchronized void close() throws SQLException
Rollbacks the current transaction. See commit for discussion of how the PreparedStatements, CallableStatement and ResultSets are closed. "
but in the oracle jdbc developer guide it is stated that the method close issues a commit and then close the connection.

I would say that according to my experience closing a connection commits the current transaction. I use the jdbc driver specified below.
Has something changed with the latest release? Am I missing something?
Michele
anifest-Version: 1.0
Specification-Title: Oracle JDBC driver classes for use with JDK12
Sealed: true
Created-By: 1.4.2_08 (Sun Microsystems Inc.)
Implementation-Title: classes12.jar
Specification-Vendor: Oracle Corporation
Specification-Version: Oracle JDBC Driver version - "10.2.0.1.0"
Implementation-Version: Oracle JDBC Driver version - "10.2.0.1.0"
Implementation-Vendor: Oracle Corporation
Implementation-Time: Wed Jun 22 11:17:12 2005

Same doubts about the migration.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for