Same image - different appearance between modules

I am struggling with migration of my LR2 catalogue etc to a new PC with Windows 7, using the same Eizo monitor. Setting aside annoying discrepancies between original and migrated development histories, I was examining a recent snow landscape scene whose white balance was not as I had adjusted it in 'old' computer. Development history appears to have gone yet the corrections appear to take effect when viewed in the Develop module. Good! But when I then switch to Library mode, the white balance changes slightly. What is going on?
Can an image with embedded metadata transfer to new computer with the effects of past development work without revealing it in the new history? Certainly it seems so. But why should there be a visible difference when viewed in two modules? More important, where lies the truth?

With Lr 2 the "truth" lies in the Develop module when image is zoomed so that image is being viewed at 100%. However, it's generally the case that Fit view and 1:1 view will match. The exceptions being when there is a high level of sharpening or colour noise correction.
Development history appears to have gone yet the corrections appear to take effect when viewed in the Develop module. Good! But when I then switch to Library mode, the white balance changes slightly. What is going on?
Try zooming to 1:1 in Library module. This forces the preview to refresh.

Similar Messages

Same image, different sizes

I need to export the same image in different formats, for iPhone, iPad, Web etc.
Actually, I import into one frame and then - Copy/Paste into/Fill Frame Proportionally - on the other frames.
Is there a simple way to do this in one shot? I can write a script to do this, but I was wondering if there was some sort of Command I was missing…
Thank you

Are yout talking about Alternative Layouts with the same content?
Use the Content Collector and Placer tools and use the same image or content several times. If you work with object styles (as you should ALWAYS do) you can specify a auto fitting property in that style.
With Liquid Layout you can specify the behavior of any frame how it resizes if the page gets or has different sizes.

How can I make different catalogs from the same image

How can I make different catalogs from the same image where that image has been changed in some way between the catalogs. For instance if I wanted to have a catalogs for cropped images and have 3 catalogs one for 4x6 , 5x7 and 8x10 cropping. When I tried this , if I changed a file in one catalog that same image in the other would change also.

Do not confuse the creation of the crops and the display in collections per crop ratio.
Of course one virtual copy (VC) per crop ratio is needed. If the same image should be cropped in all 3 mentioned ratios there would be 3 VCs.
The OP asked how to have/see a set of same-crop-ratios.
After having created the virtual copies for whatever crop ratio he wants, the way to display this result in the fashion asked for is via smart collections, provided they can be found. Without a plugin the naming of the VC with the crop ratio applied is a straight way to achieve that.
IF the wish is to get new crops automatically added. (See my answers 2+3)
IF the wish is to creat static collections per crop ratio for a certain set of images, I'd go as follows:
1. Select all images you want to have cropped in that way,.
2. With this selection click on the + to add another collection and fill the dialog box like this:
Then navigate into this newly created selection and perform the 4x6 crop - according to taste individually or by synchronizing the first crop.
Cornelia

How can two pictures of the same size still appear to be a different size? (Photoshop CS6 problem)

I called the big webdesign file "(X)" and the image I wanted to paste in it "(Y)",
so that you won't be confused when you read it.
What Happened
For the design of a webpage, I made a photoshop-file(X) with a lot of squares(X). These squares(X) had the size 9,42×9,42 centimeters.
I measured the squares(X) carefully and also made sure the size was in centimeters, so I am sure that the size was 9,42×9,42 cm.
My plan was to fill the squares(X) with pictures(Y). I had a map on my computer with a lot of square-sized JPG-images(Y) in it. All I had
to do was open the pictures(Y) in photoshop, change the size into 9,42×9,42 centimeters and copy+paste them into the squares(X)
of the webdesign. I did this before and it worked perfectly.
But then, I opened one of the images(Y) and when I wanted to resize it, the resize-tool said it was only 3,25×3,25 centimeters big.
I thought it was strange, so I copied+pasted it into the design-file(X) with all the squares(X) that needed to be filled. Allthough photoshop
had told me that the squares(X) in the file were 9,42×9,42 centimeters big and the image(Y) I resized was 3,25×3,25, the "small" image(Y)
turned out to be bigger then the squares(X). And when I resized the "small" image(Y) into 9,42×9,42 centimeters, it was even bigger
than it was before. How can this be, and how can I still make the images(X&Y) the same size?
What I already tried
- I made the file of the webdesign(X) with all the squares(X) into one layer, copied the file(X) and opened a new file(X) with the same
measurements of the old file(X). I also changed the resolution of the file(X) into pixels/centimeters instead of pixels/inches.
Then I pasted the image(X) of the old file into the new file. I didn't work; the image(X) that I pasted in the new file was bigger and
when I pasted the other picture(Y) in this image, the same problem was still there.
- I also opened the picture(Y) in photoshop, made a screenshot of it and then pasted the screenshot into paint. With paint I cropped
it again and saved it as a JPEG-file. After that, I opened the image (Y) in photoshop again. It now had the size of 11,27×11,27 centimeters.
Then I resized the image(Y) into 9,42×9,42 cm, but it still wasn't as big as the squares(X).
Could you help me please?
I really don't understand why this problem is happening and I can't think of a solution because I am still quite unexperienced with photoshop
and I also couldn't find the answer on the internet. I assume the solution is very simple, but I haven't found it yet allthough I have to finish this
project soon and I also have to use the image(Y). So any help would be very appreciated.
Thanks,
Simone

You need to understand the basic of a digital image.
Image is recorded as pixels and image is a rectangle so many pixels wide and so many pixel high. Pixels do not have a fixed size. The images resolution setting defines the image current pixel size.
So for example if you have and image that is 300 pixel wide and 200 pixels high and set its dip resolution to 100DPI the image size is 3" wide and 2" high. Set its dip setting tp 300DPI the image size becomes 1" wide by 2/3" high. Both the 3" x 2" and the 1"x2/3" images have the same 60000 RGB Colored Pixels.
Web pages are sized to to be so many pixel wide and so many pixel high. Often the height is not enforced scrolling is used when viewing.
However image for web pages often must not exceed so many pixel wide and high for displays have a fixed resolution and a fixed number of Pixels. You want images to fit on users displays. Users use different displays some have high resolution displays and other have low resolution displays with far fewer pixels then high resolution displays.
Web Image are normally image that have been interpolated down in number of pixels a resampled large image so that web image will fit on a low resolution display with limited number of pixels. The image size the user see depend on the display they are currently using. A low resolution display's image will be much larger then the same image displayed on a nexus 10 with a 300dip display. Cheep low cost Desktop LCD have a 84DIP resolution, large high cost desktop displays are not be much higher in resolution somewhere near 108DPI. Tablets, Laptop and Phones can have much higher resolution like the nexus 10 300DPI IPS display

How do I make a 20 X 30 print with layers of 16 X 20, 12 X 18, 11 X 14, 8 X 12, 8 X 10, 5 X 7 and 4 X 6 of the same image to display the different sizes available to someone? Using Elements 13 with Windows 8.1

How do I make a 20 X 30 print with layers of 16 X 20, 12 X 18, 11 X 14, 8 X 12, 8 X 10, 5 X 7 and 4 X 6 of the same image to display the different sizes available to someone? Using Elements 13 with Windows 8.1
A senior citizen needs some help.
Thanks

Saving each image as different size - is it an option for you? I would save images with their name as: 20x30.png, 16x20.png etc etc.
Or explain whether you want these in a webpage in which case only one image is necessary and different sizes are displayed with good CSS code. this is question for Dreamweaver forum if this is what you want.

LR won't synch same images in different folder

I need to keep multiple copies of the same images in different folders (to track submissions to different agencies) but LR seems very erratic at synching pictures it thinks already exist in the catalogue - some of the duplicates show up, others not, but it seems impossible to get all folders to synch properly. Is there any way around this?

Yes, I remember, David. Glad it's still working.
Assuming the current workflow, I reckon the answer is going to lie in establishing which files are omitted. If filenames don't match any files already in the catalogue, I'd expect all to arrive safely. But if a jpg's name matches an existing file (ignoring the extensions) then there might be a clash. One area is Edit > Preferences > Import where you may want to try ticking Treat JPEG files next to raw files as separate. But see if you can establish the pattern of what gets imported and what's not.
A pure Lightroom solution would be not to keep all these files. So you would have the master image (a raw or a worked tif), and then create virtual copies for each of the uses that you want to track - right click a thumbnail and Create Virtual Copy. Each VC has a copy name, which I'd suggest setting (Metadata panel) to the usage, Getty, Alamy etc. When you need to send it to the agency, get the VC and export at the size and format required, send the exported file, but don't keep a real file copy - the VC could suffice. I put this more for you to think over.
John

Why are some jpg images scrambled when they appear in my screen saver? The same images look fine in Preview and Finder. Some images appear scrambled in the screen saver 'preview' window and the actual screen saver. Other jpg images look fine.

Why are some jpg images scrambled when they appear in my screen saver? The same images look fine in Preview and Finder. Some images appear scrambled in the screen saver 'preview' window and the actual screen saver. Other jpg images look fine.

The desktop image is fine, taken from the exact same pool of jpg photos. However, as soon as the slide show screen saver comes on, the images are scrambled. What is it about the apple screen saver algorithm that scrambles the pics?

Same image appears in all rows in jsp read only table :(

ok this is the the problem: let say i have a table IMAGES (ID NUMBER, PIC ORDSYS.ORDIMAGE) and i want to show the table in web with all images... and let say that every row have a different image loaded in db...
if i want to create an UIX page to show the content all i need to do is just to drag and drop the view as readonly table from data control pallet and when i run the app all images are listed...
but in JSP instead of different images listed i got one image in all of the rows... and when i change the row currency (click on next or preview) all images in all rows change to the image of current row.... and i dont want that...
i want to be able to show apropriate image in every row...
image is shown using adf renderer just like here: http://www.oracle.com/technology/sample_code/products/jdev/10g/StreamingMedia.zip
but that sample code have the same problem, atleast on my system... instead of differnet images in differnet rows i see the same image in all rows (image from the current row)
any help?
thank you in advance :)

ok guys i found the solution thanks to steve muench and his "upload text file and image example" on his weblog..
thanks steve :)
insted of:
<adf:render model="bindings.Pic"/>
it should be
<adf:render model="Row.Pic"/>

To turn on my ipod, I get an image of connection to iTunes, but when you update iTunes, nothing happens. I restarted the iPod manually several times peero still appears the same image. how I can make it work?

to turn on my ipod, I get an image of connection to iTunes, but when you update iTunes, nothing happens. I restarted the iPod manually several times peero still appears the same image. how I can make it work?

Restore the ipod

Differance between module pool & report programming

hi can any 1 tell me what is a big difference between module pool & report programs why is the need of module pool if we can do all the things with report program, please tell me technically how it behave
Please search for available information before posting
Edited by: kishan P on Sep 6, 2010 11:22 AM

Hi, Ashwinv
Welcome to SCN
Please Search Before Posting any More
Please read "The Forum Rules of Engagement" before posting! HOT NEWS!!
Thanks and Regards,
Faisal

Labview vision - while loop + image + shiftregister = 2 times same image.

Well I got this problem here at home.
I've this .vi
I've labview 8.6 + labview vision module + labview vision module for usb webcams.
Well this .vi is pretty simple but it gives me some strange results...
When I run this I get the same image on "image1" and "image2"... while in fact "image2" should be the "image1" of the last loop. This should be visible when you set the sleep time of the loop higher. Now the problem is is that on my frontpanel "image1" and "image2" are ALWAYS equal... But then when I click on the two wires of "image2" and "image1" then the difference is visible. But on the frontpanel "image1" equals "image2"...
A couple of weeks ago when I first was testing with labview + vision on my university there was a visible difference between the two images. This was with the same webcam and software.
Anyone got an idea how this is possible?

Wetzer wrote:
You can think of the purple "Image" Wire as a Pointer to the Buffer containing the actual Image data.
That's what I thought too, but why would it behave differently during execution highlighting? (sorry, I don't have IMAQ, just curious )
LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

Different CUOBJ between sales order item and production order

Hi gurus,
Our SAP solution is IS Mill & Variant configuration based, we're using ECC6 as OLTP system mapped to APO PP/DS from which module we trigger the planned order into production order conversion. We're exclusively using the 2 different production type : MTO & MTS. When Sales order based (MTO), it was not possible so far to change the configuration of the production order since following Message no. CO661 was advising the data for the configuration was taken from the allocated SO:
Here is an old thread we'd posted where we were requesting further details about above message: Message CO 661 - Characteristics values were copied - you can only display
We recently upgraded SP level (SAP_BASIS) from 15 to 30 on ECC6 side, SAP Basis Component on SCM side has been remaining unchanged with release 700 level 016.
We now observe the message is unexpectively NOT raising anymore so-that the configuration can be freely adjusted; reason seem to be a different CUOBJ between the SO and its production order; please not the issue do not take place when creating the production order directly from ECC6 through CO08.
Would you please help to clarify the reason of such a behaviour? Thanks in advance.
Remark: snote 1326891 has been patched but w/o any added value as it do not really apply (= CTP not used)
BR,
Pascal.

UP
Below as an illustration CUOBJ from VBAP versus CUOBJ from AFPO
Both WO have been created from APO, difference is the first one was created prior our SP level upgrade. I have to admitt CUOBJ mechanism between ECC & APO is quite unclear, below CUOBJ found when reading planned order data with FM /SAPAPO/RRP_LC_ORDER_GET_DATA (reading executed prior conversion, same outcome when reading prior its creation)
BR,
Pascal.

Lack of detail in Preview vs. GIMP using same image file.

Originally posted at usenet group: comp.graphics.apps.gimp
I am in the process of working on an image using GIMP's propietary
format, XCF. The image in question is approx. 6200x3200 px in size, at
a resolution of 72x72 dpi, RGB, True Color, 24-bit. The problem is
that when I export it to a more portable format, the image loses
clarity. I've uploaded an image to Photobucket demonstrating this.
This image consists of three windows, each displaying the same portion
of the piece I'm trying to export. The window top-left indicates the
original XCF format image at 100%, displaying in GIMP; the top-right
image is the same image at 100% exported to TIFF format (with no
compression), displaying in GIMP; the centre image is the latter TIFF
image, displayed in Preview.app, zoomed as close as possible to the
same degree as the GIMP images above - though in reality just a touch
larger, more like 110%. As is clear, the centre image is far less
detailed. <edit: I made this image forgetting that you can use "Use Actual Size" to view it. Nevertheless, when viewed at actual size the image is substantially smaller and less detailed.>
Could this be partly/altogether because i configured/calibrated
GIMP's display preferences to more accurately reflect my LCD screen's
resolution? in GIMP->Display Preferences, I manually set my monitor
resolution to 106x106dpi. However, the monitor resolution reported by
the windowing system, according to GIMP Display Prefs, is 75x75dpi.
I have tried saving as PNG without the resolution data, but the result is identical.
Can someone please explain this to me? Or, at the very least, suggest
a work-around? Is this, in actual fact, a problem with Preview.app or
my Quartz Extreme rendering?
I hope someone can help with this.
Thanks,
SiR G.

>I wish the developers could give us a switch to defeat this. PS displays, or at least hints at, sharpening when zoomed out.
They are quite set against it so I doubt it. Photoshop is really lying to you in many different ways when you judge sharpness at zoomed out levels. Of course, the only reason you see it in Photoshop is that it is a pixel editor. If you have rendered 1:1 previews, in Lightroom, you always see the effect of sharpening in the Library module when zoomed out as it is rendered from the preview image. In fact what you see there is the same when in Photoshop at power of two zoom levels (25%, 50%, etc.). So it is there, they just don't show it in Develop when you are zoomed out, where it would not tell you anything anyway.

UPRIGHT: why does ACR and Lightroom process images differently using Upright

Current version of ACR and LR
MBP 2011
OSX Mavericks
Hello - I process hundreds of architectural images daily in ACR. I started using LR but found that the Upright function in ACR is much more accurate. Am I missing something here? Are these not the same functions between software?
Cheers

I am seeing identical Upright corrections in both ACR 8.6 and LR 5.6 if I start with the same raw file. It might work differently if you're doing Upright in ACR of a smaller file or a JPG vs raw or something else that makes the image different for the detection algorithms.
Can you provide a sample image you’re seeing processed differently? Upload to somewhere like http://www.dropbox.com/ and post a public download link, here.
Also what precise versions of LR and ACR are you using?

Different appearance of Nikon D600 RAW in Aperture 3.4.5 vs Nikon View NX2

Hi all, here's a question/statement of an issue with Aperture 3.4.5 processing of Nikon D600 RAW images, appears the same with both Raw Camera 4.08 and 4.07 support versions.
I'm stating that something is incorrect in Aperture's Calibration of Nikon D600 Raw images, it's not a preview or color profile issue. Exporting the original unprocessed Raw image from Aperture and ViewNX2 clearly look different. Pictures to be provided below.
The issue is present in Saturated, or close to washed out, regions of the original image. The JPEG preview looks the same as the image in Nikon ViewNX2 but as soon as Aperture has generated its own preview the image looks quite different, and, in my humble opinion, outright incorrect. My closest guess is some sort of issue in the curves handling pixel values in the extended range. The pictures below was original taken in 14-bits per component, I shall try out how 12-bits work out.
At this point I'm not able to figure out any adjustment or fine tuning of the image to make it look like the original as seen in JPEG preview and Nikon ViewNX2.
The image below is a JPEG exported from Nikon ViewNX2, no adjustments were made. The image looks just like the JPEG preview within the original RAW image. Note the graceful transition from red-ish to yellow and fully saturaded (white) sun.
Now compare the image above with the one below, which is the same image but first imported to Aperture, then exported as JPEG without any modifications. There is clearly some weird banding occurring and there is no longer a graceful blend into the fully saturated sun.
I'm not really able to explain this in any other way than really high values, possibly in the extended sRGB range, is not handled correctly, which should be the way Nikon ViewNX2 deals with it. To the best of my knowledge, no automatic adjustments have been made in Aperture.
Hope someone has a tip to repair this or that there's a fix for it somewhere.
I can provide original Raw and/or higher resolution versions upon request.
Thanks / Patric

Thanks :-)
I've seen some posts and discussions about Raw Processing and that all software naturally do some things different. Nikon and Canon will have the Ace on their hands as they know what the cameras really do. Although the NEF (Nikon Raw) format is proprietary I expect Apple, and Adobe, do have agreements to give them some SDK or specs so they can read it.
That said, the artefact shown seems more incorrect than a different flavor. The banding cannot be resolved with any traditional adjustments. So, I'd be happy if anyone could
a) Provide some tips on how to work with Curves or some other Adjustment to resolve this.
b) Confirm they also have similar problems and if they managed to resolve it.
c) Some Apple support tech could pick this up and follow-up internally.
best regards

Same image - different appearance between modules

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for