Same image displaying differently in FF and IE6

This has me beaten
http://wrfinn.com/map_leros.html
(login/password fred) - the first image (I know it's out of
alignment...
later, later).
What is displaying in FF is the original image before the
circle/text was
added.
I have deleted it from the server and replaced it
(desperation as it's fine
in IE6) checked the scripts are there although I've tested it
without the
javascript with no better results. The DOM inspector is
showing an error on
the page in FF if this helps -
[Exception... "'Permission denied to get property
XULElement.accessKey' when
calling method: [nsIDOMXULLabelElement::accessKey]" nsresult:
"0x8057001e
(NS_ERROR_XPC_JS_THREW_STRING)" location: "JS frame ::
http://wrfinn.com/map_leros.html
:: jspw3 :: line 43" data: no]
<li><a href="#" class="p7PMtrg">About
Us</a>
Could somebody possibly throw some light on this?
Jo

josie1one wrote:
> This has me beaten
>
>
http://wrfinn.com/map_leros.html
> (login/password fred) - the first image (I know it's out
of alignment...
> later, later).
>
> What is displaying in FF is the original image before
the circle/text was
> added.
>
> I have deleted it from the server and replaced it
(desperation as it's fine
> in IE6) checked the scripts are there although I've
tested it without the
> javascript with no better results. The DOM inspector is
showing an error on
> the page in FF if this helps -
>
> [Exception... "'Permission denied to get property
XULElement.accessKey' when
> calling method: [nsIDOMXULLabelElement::accessKey]"
nsresult: "0x8057001e
> (NS_ERROR_XPC_JS_THREW_STRING)" location: "JS frame ::
>
http://wrfinn.com/map_leros.html
:: jspw3 :: line 43" data: no]
> <li><a href="#" class="p7PMtrg">About
Us</a>
>
> Could somebody possibly throw some light on this?
>
Hey Jo,
did you get this resolved? - I don't see the problems that
you are
describing nor do I get a dom inspector error.
The only thing I see is that the image which should reside
under the
side nav - you haven't set a path/source for this.
chin chin
Sinclair

Similar Messages

Same colors display differently between Illustrator and Photoshop

Hi there,
I would love to know why the same colors display differently between my Photoshop and Illustrator apps (CS3). For example, a logo will display much darker or more vividly in Illustrator than in Photoshop, same file, same colour values. My color settings are synchronized from Adobe Bridge to North American Pre Press 2. I've opened the logo file in RGB color mode, in both apps. It would be so helpful if both apps displayed the colours consistently.
Any suggestions on how to do this would be wonderful!
Thanks!
Bobbie

Hello Bobbie,
I am using CS3 too and let me tell you that this Illustrator version is the worst ever. You best bet is to take the "Eye Drop" tool and select the Photoshop element to match the color.
CS4 also have problems when handle placed items. Sadly I can tell you that CS2 is more reliable than CS3 and CS4.
Not even if you use Pantone colors will match, Illustrator will change the colors making it impossible to match. "Adobe Quality"

Image Displays Differently in PS and Br CS4

I have a gs tif file that I converted to cmyk. In PS the cmyk version looks virtually identical on screen to the gs version although when you hold the eyedropper over the image, cyan displays as a higher percentage than m or y, with k lowest in both the cmyk conversion and the grayscale original...what do I have set wrong! In Bridge the cmyk version clearly shows a cyan cast.
Color settings are synchronized in CS4.
Can anyone tell me why: 1, the images are displaying differently, and, 2. using Convert To Profile, cymk, Working CMYK US Sheetfed Coated v2, image appears to have a distince cyan cast? And why, for that matter, is the GS image showing uneven cmyk percentages?
Thanks in advance
J

the images are displaying differently
Have you proofing enabled in both of them? Even if the profiles match otehrwise, that option still has to be toggled.
image appears to have a distince cyan cast?
Well, if you print CMYK, you want "rich black", which means that it needs to be underprinted with another color to not look like a dull gray. Only spot black/ text black does not require that. That's not the point here, though. It's really due to the conversion being done wrong. If you really want to retain the blacks as a pure channel, use the method described. Also, if you can, in the future simply start out in CMYK to avoid these issues.
Mylenium

PS CS5 Image Display Differs From Used ICC Profile In Win 7

Hi,
on my Windows 7 Ultimate x64 machine, I just calibrated my Dell SP2309W monitor using an i1DisplayPro and basICColor 5, creating a ICC v2 profile (I am aware of the problems under Windows with ICC v4 profiles).
It created the ICC profile and applied it to be used by Windows. I double checked under COLOR MANAGEMENT that the new ICC profile is being used. Although I can see that the new ICC is being used (desktop appearance changes), there are a few issues I am experiencing:
(1.) Windows Photo Viewer
The thumbnails in Windpows Explorer look fine (they DO use the new ICC profile), when I double click a jpeg and open the image it DOES NOT use the new ICC profile. When I click the PLAY SLIDESHOW button (starting the slideshow) in the opened image in Windows Photo Viewer, the images DO use the new ICC profile.
(2.) Internet Browsers
All current internet browser (Firefox, IE, Safari and Chrome) DO use the new ICC profile and display the image correctly.
(3.) Photoshop CS 5
When I open the same image - that Windows Photo Viewer does not correctly displays (according to the new ICC profile) - in Photoshop CS5, I get the same image display that Windows Photo Viewer gives me (when not thumbnail or not in slideshow mode) - it appears to be the sRGB display.
My color settings in PS CS5 are: North America General Purpose 2 > sRGB IEC 61966-2.1.
When I go to View > Proof Setup > Monitor RGB I get the image display using the new ICC profile.
Why does the image look different in PS than my calibrated monitor should output ?
I was under the impression (please correct me if I am wrong), that the sole purpose for calibrating my monitor was to get a uniform display across (ICC aware) applications. Even when one applies different color spaces to a document in PS, I thought the output on my calibrated screen done by the graphic card should always be according to my calibration and the settings in the ICC profile being used.
What Am I doing wrong or what am I misunderstanding ?
Any help or input is appreciated !
Thanks.
- M

Hello,
A note on monitor calibration: calibrating your monitor will not guarentee that every application will display color correctly, it's more of a step along the pipeline, and for the preview part of a color workflow it's the last step. Here's how color translation follows for an ICC workflow when previewing to a monitor:
Image Color Numbers > Document Tag or Workspace Profile > Monitor Profile
For non-color managed applications, if the original document is or isn't tagged with a color profile it will be translated directly to the monitor profile anyway. This is the equivalent in Photoshop of selecting "Monitor" in soft proofing. Selecting monitor in softproofing will bypass the tagged or workspace profile to translate colors directly through the monitor profile.
For most automatic color managed applications (like Firefox), the image will be translated through the tagged profile and then sent through the monitor profile. If the image is untagged or the profile is unrecognized, the colors get sent directly to the monitor profile.
For Photoshop, a tagged document will have its profile respected and then sent to the monitor. An untagged document will be assigned the workspace profile, which acts like a temporary document profile, and then gets sent to the monitor. This is often why users will notice Photoshop behaves differently from other applications. It's usually a case of the workspace coming into play. By default the workspace profile is set to sRGB. You can change this in Edit > Color Settings.
The purpose of the workspace is originally for printing workflows, as a way of keeping consistant color translations when dealing with both tagged and untagged documents. For web output workflows it can be useful for viewing everything through sRGB, which is typical of the average monitor output (not so with newer wide-gamut monitors, another source of confusion...) combined with the fact that originally most web browsers were not color managed. Hence viewing everything through sRGB is pretty close to what most monitors see and what untagged/unmanaged docs will look like.
Monitor calibration is useful only because it brings your monitor output to a "known state". In traditional workflows the monitor was always a middle-man, a preview device which was useful for getting an idea of what the printed output would look like before you print it. Since print colorspaces are often smaller than display spaces, it's feasible and useful to narrow down the monitor/display space and calibrate it to a known state, so that even if it doesn't totally match the print, you'll get used to its differences/limitations and they'll be consistent so long as the calibration is maintained.
For web output, your final output is often another user's computer monitor, which can have any form of behavior (most standard monitors are pretty close to sRGB, or use sRGB as an operating system workspace (default monitor profile). Wide gamuts behave differently, but I'm not sure if there's a particular ICC space that they closely match, or if different wide-gamuts are even that close to each other in their display color spaces.
Hope this helps!

LR won't synch same images in different folder

I need to keep multiple copies of the same images in different folders (to track submissions to different agencies) but LR seems very erratic at synching pictures it thinks already exist in the catalogue - some of the duplicates show up, others not, but it seems impossible to get all folders to synch properly. Is there any way around this?

Yes, I remember, David. Glad it's still working.
Assuming the current workflow, I reckon the answer is going to lie in establishing which files are omitted. If filenames don't match any files already in the catalogue, I'd expect all to arrive safely. But if a jpg's name matches an existing file (ignoring the extensions) then there might be a clash. One area is Edit > Preferences > Import where you may want to try ticking Treat JPEG files next to raw files as separate. But see if you can establish the pattern of what gets imported and what's not.
A pure Lightroom solution would be not to keep all these files. So you would have the master image (a raw or a worked tif), and then create virtual copies for each of the uses that you want to track - right click a thumbnail and Create Virtual Copy. Each VC has a copy name, which I'd suggest setting (Metadata panel) to the usage, Getty, Alamy etc. When you need to send it to the agency, get the VC and export at the size and format required, send the exported file, but don't keep a real file copy - the VC could suffice. I put this more for you to think over.
John

How do I copy purchases between 2 itunes libraries on the same computer with different log ins and separate apple user ids?

How do I copy purchases between 2 itunes libraries on the same computer with different log ins and separate apple user ids?

Load the library which doesn't contain the songs and drag them into the open iTunes application window. If you need to move them between different computer user accounts, put them into /Users/Shared/.
(74502)

Same sqlID with different execution plan and Elapsed Time (s), Executions time

Hello All,
The AWR reports for two days with same sqlID with different execution plan and Elapsed Time (s), Executions time please help me to find out what is reason for this change.
Please find the below detail 17th day my process are very slow as compare to 18th
17th Oct 18th Oct
221,808,602
21
2tc2d3u52rppt
213,170,100
72,495,618
9c8wqzz7kyf37
209,239,059
71,477,888
9c8wqzz7kyf37
139,331,777
1
7b0kzmf0pfpzn
144,813,295
1
0cqc3bxxd1yqy
102,045,818
1
8vp1ap3af0ma5
128,892,787
16,673,829
84cqfur5na6fg
89,485,065
1
5kk8nd3uzkw13
127,467,250
16,642,939
1uz87xssm312g
67,520,695
8,058,820
a9n705a9gfb71
104,490,582
12,443,376
a9n705a9gfb71
62,627,205
1
ctwjy8cs6vng2
101,677,382
15,147,771
3p8q3q0scmr2k
57,965,892
268,353
akp7vwtyfmuas
98,000,414
1
0ybdwg85v9v6m
57,519,802
53
1kn9bv63xvjtc
87,293,909
1
5kk8nd3uzkw13
52,690,398
0
9btkg0axsk114
77,786,274
74
1kn9bv63xvjtc
34,767,882
1,003
bdgma0tn8ajz9
Not only queries are different but also the number of blocks read by top 10 queries are much higher on 17th than 18th.
The other big difference is the average read time on two days
Tablespace IO Stats
17th Oct
Tablespace
Reads
Av Reads/s
Av Rd(ms)
Av Blks/Rd
Writes
Av Writes/s
Buffer Waits
Av Buf Wt(ms)
INDUS_TRN_DATA01
947,766
59
4.24
4.86
185,084
11
2,887
6.42
UNDOTBS2
517,609
32
4.27
1.00
112,070
7
108
11.85
INDUS_MST_DATA01
288,994
18
8.63
8.38
52,541
3
23,490
7.45
INDUS_TRN_INDX01
223,581
14
11.50
2.03
59,882
4
533
4.26
TEMP
198,936
12
2.77
17.88
11,179
1
732
2.13
INDUS_LOG_DATA01
45,838
3
4.81
14.36
348
0
1
0.00
INDUS_TMP_DATA01
44,020
3
4.41
16.55
244
0
1,587
4.79
SYSAUX
19,373
1
19.81
1.05
14,489
1
0
0.00
INDUS_LOG_INDX01
17,559
1
4.75
1.96
2,837
0
2
0.00
SYSTEM
7,881
0
12.15
1.04
1,361
0
109
7.71
INDUS_TMP_INDX01
1,873
0
11.48
13.62
231
0
0
0.00
INDUS_MST_INDX01
256
0
13.09
1.04
194
0
2
10.00
UNDOTBS1
70
0
1.86
1.00
60
0
0
0.00
STG_DATA01
63
0
1.27
1.00
60
0
0
0.00
USERS
63
0
0.32
1.00
60
0
0
0.00
INDUS_LOB_DATA01
62
0
0.32
1.00
60
0
0
0.00
TS_AUDIT
62
0
0.48
1.00
60
0
0
0.00
18th Oct
Tablespace
Reads
Av Reads/s
Av Rd(ms)
Av Blks/Rd
Writes
Av Writes/s
Buffer Waits
Av Buf Wt(ms)
INDUS_TRN_DATA01
980,283
91
1.40
4.74

The AWR reports for two days with same sqlID with different execution plan and Elapsed Time (s), Executions time please help me to find out what is reason for this change.
Please find the below detail 17th day my process are very slow as compare to 18th
You wrote with different execution plan, I think, you saw plans. It is very difficult, you get old plan.
I think Execution plans is not changed in different days, if you not added index or ...
What say ADDM report about this script?
As you know, It is normally, different Elapsed Time for same statement in different day.
It is depend your database workload.
It think you must use SQL Access and SQl Tuning advisor for this script.
You can get solution for slow running problem.
Regards
Mahir M. Quluzade

Why are some jpg images scrambled when they appear in my screen saver? The same images look fine in Preview and Finder. Some images appear scrambled in the screen saver 'preview' window and the actual screen saver. Other jpg images look fine.

Why are some jpg images scrambled when they appear in my screen saver? The same images look fine in Preview and Finder. Some images appear scrambled in the screen saver 'preview' window and the actual screen saver. Other jpg images look fine.

The desktop image is fine, taken from the exact same pool of jpg photos. However, as soon as the slide show screen saver comes on, the images are scrambled. What is it about the apple screen saver algorithm that scrambles the pics?

Indesign image display is very slow and jerky

good morning
I contacted Adobe Customer Service in Italy because I have big problems with the Creative Suite CS 5.5, in particular with Indesign and in general with the display of images of AI and Acrobat.
As I work with Indesign image display is very slow and jerky. Even with AI and Acrobat work experience is not good, the images are jerky and there are hesitations in the fluidity of view.
The software is installed on windows 7 64bit Utlimate, the workstation is very powerful: Supermicro motherboard, dual Xeon E5620 2.4ghz, 16gb ram, SSD OCZ vertex4, PNY Nvidia Quadro 4000.
The customer service has sent me several tips for email, I have followed all the instructions but I did not get results. In conclusion, when I pointed out that reading on the forums I was not the only one who showed this problem and after discussing about my hardware configuration, they told me that the problem is probably due to the fact that I have two Xeon processors!
In efects had observed that CS 5.5 on my notebook works better, but I never thought about having problems because the PC is powerful. I checked the CPU and GPU when using Indesign and I could see that uses a single CPU, and most "only 1 core"! But of CPUs in the system there are two for a total of 8 cores. Indesign seems to use only 1/8 of the available computing power ... In addition, practically does not use the GPU (only 10-15%).
From the customer service was suggested to disable or remove a processor from the system. All this seems to me incredible. I use the workstation for applications that can take advantage of the power of the machine, should I remove the processor whenever I have to use CS 5.5? If things are this way I'm thinking of asking if Adobe buy me a PC with a single processor only for use with CS 5.5 ...
Thank you.

Interesting idea, I'll investigate in this direction, I should try to make a mirror of the ssd on a traditional hard drive, exchange them and see if the situation changes. It must, however, be a further factor in the eventual bad combination hardware ... on my laptop I have: windows 7 x64, intel core i7 processor, 16gb of ram, nvidia quadro 3000m, and .... a ssd ocz agility 3, but indesign is more responsive.
But why indesign should be influenced by the hard-drive? With 16gb of ram and working files on NAS because in design interacts with the hard drive?

Why are images displayed in Photoshop different than the same images displayed in Indesign?

My images imported to Indesign do NOT display as the images in Photoshop.
They seem to display under different color profiles.
The images in Indesign are more desaturated than the images in Photoshop.
This is a problem because now I don't know which image appearance to trust!
How can you get the Indesign images to look like the images in Photoshop?
I use Photoshop CS4 and Indesign CS3.
I import the images from Photoshop to Indesign for exporting to a PDF as the base for Blurb printing (www.blurb.com).
I use the CMYK profile Blurb_ICC_profile.icc:
The images in PS4 are converted to Blurb_ICC_Profile (CMYK).
Both in PS4 and ID3 the color settings are
                           Working spaces:
                              CMYK: Blurb_ICC_profile
                           Color management Policies:
                               CMYK: Preserve Embedded Profiles.
The images are imported into Indesign by drag and drop from Bridge CS4. In Bridge it says that the images have color profile CMYK, Blurb_ICC_profile.
I also do get "Unsynchronized: Your Creative Suite Applications are not synchronized for consistent color." And I don't seem to be able synchronize between CS3 and CS4, or whatever. I do NOT depend on any synchronization.
The settings above should be enough to show the images consistently in Photoshop and Indesign.
SO WHY DOES IT NOT?
Should not Adobes own applications be able to keep color consistency?

Hi WA Veghe,
>First: DO synchronize, makes sure you have the same profile settings and color mange settings.
I don't seem to be able to synchronize between CS4 (Photoshop) and CS3 (Indesign).
It seems I have to do without synchronizing..
>I do not seem to find HOW you are diplaying images on you screen: with Soft proofing?
What happens if you soft proof in Photoshop and InDesign on screen: View > Proof colors. Do you proof with the same profiles, both simulate paper and black on?
I can simulate Proof Colors (working CMYK), but not simulate Paper, both in Indesign and Photoshop.
Problem is: SAME settings in Photoshop and Indesign BUT the image displayed in Photoshop is brighter and more saturated.
So which image should I correct after?
thanks for all help
/L

Image size different in debug and publish

My project is purely actionscript based movie. I am trying to
display an image file (jpg) that is received from the movie server.
The image file displays with corect zoom dimensions when in
development environment but after the movie is published...the
image displays full size (612x494). It gets more
wierd...occassionally it works correctly (displays image with
correct zoom) after several tries of publishing the movie.
Any ideas what might be the cause of this? Please help!!!
regards,
staylor
>>>>>>>>>More
Info:>>>>>>>>>
the following code is executed to size up the image after
image load is complete.
viewPort_width_ = 450;
viewPort_height_= 350;
var zoom : Number = 1;
var scale : Number = 100 * zoom;
image_.scrollRect = new Rectangle(0 / zoom,0 /
zoom,viewPort_width_ / zoom,viewPort_height_ / zoom);
image_._xscale = image_._yscale = scale;

The image on the left in PS looks the same in Picasa Image
Viewer (I selected it to be color managed based on the monitor profile), looks the same in Windows Image Viewer, and looks the same in the thumbnail. The image on the right in LR is how the picture looks when I look at my image in Firefox but in Internet Explorer and in Chrome, the image looks like the image on the left in PS. The image below shows how the thumbnail looks different from the actual picture when it's double clicked and viewed in Picasa. The thumbnail (which shows the subjects having green skin) would be how I saw it online while the double clicked version is how I saw it in PS, even though it was sRGB (I checked the image properties to make sure of the color space).
I have a ATI 5470 GPU on my ASUS 17.3 inch laptop. Not sure about the drivers.

Image size different in debug and in publish

My project is purely actionscript based movie. I am trying to
display an image file (jpg) that is received from the movie server.
The image file displays with corect zoom dimensions when in
development environment but after the movie is published...the
image displays full size (612x494). It gets more
wierd...occassionally it works correctly (displays image with
correct zoom) after several tries of publishing the movie.
Any ideas what might be the cause of this? Please help!!!
regards,
staylor
>>>>>>>>>More
Info:>>>>>>>>>
the following code is executed to size up the image after
image load is complete.
viewPort_width_ = 450;
viewPort_height_= 350;
var zoom : Number = 1;
var scale : Number = 100 * zoom;
image_.scrollRect = new Rectangle(0 / zoom,0 /
zoom,viewPort_width_ / zoom,viewPort_height_ / zoom);
image_._xscale = image_._yscale = scale;

The image on the left in PS looks the same in Picasa Image
Viewer (I selected it to be color managed based on the monitor profile), looks the same in Windows Image Viewer, and looks the same in the thumbnail. The image on the right in LR is how the picture looks when I look at my image in Firefox but in Internet Explorer and in Chrome, the image looks like the image on the left in PS. The image below shows how the thumbnail looks different from the actual picture when it's double clicked and viewed in Picasa. The thumbnail (which shows the subjects having green skin) would be how I saw it online while the double clicked version is how I saw it in PS, even though it was sRGB (I checked the image properties to make sure of the color space).
I have a ATI 5470 GPU on my ASUS 17.3 inch laptop. Not sure about the drivers.

Images displayed differently in Firefox

I have a Dreamweaver page that displays normally in IE. But when I open it in firefox, one of the elements is displayed differently. Specifically, I have some social media icons that are supposed to be displayed horizontally, and they are in IE. But when I open the same page in Firefox, it displays those same icons vertically. How can I correct that? Thanks.
http://www.blackexpotourweb.com/hampton.html

This is what I see
<style type="text/css">
html {
    background-color: #000;
    height: 100%
body {
    width: 1000px;
    margin: auto;
    background: url(http://www.keystonemkg.com/Hampton.gif) no-repeat;
    height: 800px;
    position:relative;
    background-image: url(Hampton.gif);
.maintext {
    font-family: "Courier New", Courier, monospace;
#apDiv1 {
    position:absolute;
    width:174px;
    height:305px;
    z-index:1;
    left: 289px;
    top: 329px;
#apDiv2 {
    position:absolute;
    width:328px;
    height:449px;
    z-index:2;
    left: 138px;
    top: -49px;
#apDiv3 {
    position:absolute;
    width:137px;
    height:126px;
    z-index:2;
    left: 448px;
    top: 417px;
.infotext {
    font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif;
    color: #FFF;
siteinfo {
    font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif;
    font-weight: bold;
    color: #000;
.siteinfo {
    font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif;
    color: #000;
#apDiv4 {
    position:absolute;
    width:715px;
    height:22px;
    z-index:3;
    left: 253px;
    top: 804px;
#apDiv5 {
    position:absolute;
    width:170px;
    height:242px;
    z-index:4;
    left: 46px;
    top: 408px;
    text-align: center;
dropsha {
    border-top-style: solid;
    border-right-style: solid;
    border-bottom-style: solid;
    border-left-style: solid;
#apDiv6 {
    position:absolute;
    width:883px;
    height:62px;
    z-index:5;
    left: 71px;
    top: 141px;
    vertical-align: middle;
    text-align: center;
#apDiv7 {
    position:absolute;
    width:170px;
    height:69px;
    z-index:4;
    left: 51px;
    top: 710px;
    text-align: center;
#apDiv4 .infotext .siteinfo {
eventtext {
    font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif;
#apDiv8 {
    position:absolute;
    width:181px;
    height:27px;
    z-index:6;
    left: 281px;
    top: 327px;
    font-weight: bold;
a:link {
    color: #FFF;
a:hover {
    color: #F00;
#apDiv9 {
    position:absolute;
    width:200px;
    height:115px;
    z-index:6;
    left: 16px;
    top: 764px;
.maintext1 {    color: #FFF;
    font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif;
#apDiv10 {
    position:absolute;
    width:115px;
    height:36px;
    z-index:6;
    left: 831px;
    top: 716px;
    float: left;
#rightjust {
    text-align: right;
#apDiv11 {
    position:absolute;
    width:868px;
    height:53px;
    z-index:7;
    left: 77px;
    top: 214px;
    text-align: center;
</style>
What you need to do is add the bold part into this as per
<style type="text/css">
html {
    background-color: #000;
    height: 100%
body {
    width: 1000px;
    margin: auto;
    background: url(http://www.keystonemkg.com/Hampton.gif) no-repeat;
    height: 800px;
    position:relative;
    background-image: url(Hampton.gif);
.maintext {
    font-family: "Courier New", Courier, monospace;
#apDiv1 {
    position:absolute;
    width:174px;
    height:305px;
    z-index:1;
    left: 289px;
    top: 329px;
#apDiv2 {
    position:absolute;
    width:328px;
    height:449px;
    z-index:2;
    left: 138px;
    top: -49px;
#apDiv3 {
    position:absolute;
    width:137px;
    height:126px;
    z-index:2;
    left: 448px;
    top: 417px;
.infotext {
    font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif;
    color: #FFF;
siteinfo {
    font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif;
    font-weight: bold;
    color: #000;
.siteinfo {
    font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif;
    color: #000;
#apDiv4 {
    position:absolute;
    width:715px;
    height:22px;
    z-index:3;
    left: 253px;
    top: 804px;
#apDiv5 {
    position:absolute;
    width:170px;
    height:242px;
    z-index:4;
    left: 46px;
    top: 408px;
    text-align: center;
dropsha {
    border-top-style: solid;
    border-right-style: solid;
    border-bottom-style: solid;
    border-left-style: solid;
#apDiv6 {
    position:absolute;
    width:883px;
    height:62px;
    z-index:5;
    left: 71px;
    top: 141px;
    vertical-align: middle;
    text-align: center;
#apDiv7 {
    position:absolute;
    width:170px;
    height:69px;
    z-index:4;
    left: 51px;
    top: 710px;
    text-align: center;
#apDiv4 .infotext .siteinfo {
eventtext {
    font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif;
#apDiv8 {
    position:absolute;
    width:181px;
    height:27px;
    z-index:6;
    left: 281px;
    top: 327px;
    font-weight: bold;
a:link {
    color: #FFF;
a:hover {
    color: #F00;
#apDiv9 {
    position:absolute;
    width:200px;
    height:115px;
    z-index:6;
    left: 16px;
    top: 764px;
.maintext1 {    color: #FFF;
    font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif;
#apDiv10 {
    position:absolute;
    width:115px;
    height:36px;
    z-index:6;
    left: 831px;
    top: 716px;
    float: left;
#apDiv10 img {
    float: left;
#rightjust {
    text-align: right;
#apDiv11 {
    position:absolute;
    width:868px;
    height:53px;
    z-index:7;
    left: 77px;
    top: 214px;
    text-align: center;
</style>
and remove the float: left that you placed in the meantime under #apDiv10
Gramps

Saved image displays differently outside Photoshop

When I save an image I've been working on in Photoshop, then open the saved file outside Photoshop, the image looks quite different than it does inside Photoshop, much drabber and less saturated. I have both Photoshop and the display program set to sRGB. I figure that I should have consistency within the monitor, whether it's calibrated or not. I'm sure I'm missing something basic here. I'd appreciate any help here, because my prints wind up drab, too. Many thanks!

LBJack wrote:
I overlooked one switch in the Save dialog. Now the images display correctly.
Can you be more specific, please?
Were you saving images without a color profile before, and some application(s) in your system were displaying them improperly?
Problem is, in that case one wouldn't really expect to see the kind of difference you describe unless your document profile really wasn't sRGB IEC61966-2.1.
Is it possible you're editing your images in the Adobe RGB 1998 color space? That could happen if you're opening images through Camera Raw, as the color space it's set to deliver is configured separately (via the link at the bottom-center of the Camera Raw dialog) from the Photoshop defaults.
By the way, if you don't already know, you can easily set the status block in the lower-left of the Photoshop window to show you the color space of your current document:
-Noel

Images displaying differently in Library view to Develop - also affecting Exports

I've run in to a strange problem since the 4.1 upgrade.
When displayed in the Library view, images are not appearing correctly. In my case, there is a huge amount more noise in the Library view compared to the Develop view. This is also affecting Exports.
I have been unable to find any answers online, and only found one other case of this reported via a You Tube video.
Any ideas?!
Many thanks
Rick

I am assuming you have a correctly calibrated monitor calibrated using a hardware calibrator. Lightroom sometimes shows the aforementioned problems with canned monitor profiles on windows machines. Now that out of the way:
I am also having this problem - the library view is closer to the printer output - very frustrating! In dev mode the image is lighter - sometimes appears to be too hot, but in library and during print it is just right. This was not a problem in 3 - what's the fix?
Have you tried seeing what happens when you soft proof for the paper profile in the Develop module?
It seem the fit views do not match up...the confusion comes in that it seems the fill views sometimes do, and sometimes do not match. when the images appear different, I've the sense in dev the images are brighter and hotter.
This can happen if your image is very noisy or has a lot of high frequency detail. The sharpening preview in fit view that is applied in Develop tends to brighten images with lots of noise or detail. It also happens when you are applying a lot of color noise reduction and have a lot of colored detail. SInce Lightroom cannot really show you the result of this correctly but for when looking at 1:1, this results in the Fit preview showing more color saturation than there really is.

Same image displaying differently in FF and IE6

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for