Same sync interface, multiple receivers

I have to make the same syncronous call into two R3 systems out of BPM. So the sender service and interface are the same, how the receiver service is different. I get the error that you cannot make multiple sync calls at once. So I have to use two send steps. However, there is no data that I can use to differentiate between which receiver to call each time. Can I send a value out of the BPM to make the difference?

Chris,
You have to split the message using the fork step and make a sync call for each receiver using the switch step.
Make sure yo configure the receivers correctly in the Configuration.
Thanks
Prasad

Similar Messages

Sending the same data to multiple receivers.

Hi,
In 7.1, I did a simple file-to-file scenario with mulitple receivers.I used only 1 Rcvr Det.(included multiple business components) and 1 Interface Det. without BPM and it works.I would like to know if there's any other way to send same data to multiple receivers without BPM and/or the approach used by me.
Thanks,
Vishal

Thanks all for your replies. I did multimapping as suggested by couple of you and it works. Since it is required to send to 7 or more systems and the no. of fields to be mapped is huge, multimapping is time-consuming. So I would like to know if there's any other approach.
@Ravi: can you please explain with more details regarding the approach suggested by you?
Can someone explain why and/or how a mapping executes multiple times if we have multiple receivers getting the same data?
And if there's any way to check(For Ex: Moni) if the mapping executed multiple times?
Thanks in adavnce,
Vishal

Send a message to multiple receivers from the same service

Hi all,
I registered on SAP community several months ago, I found many good hints and solutions to some of the problems encountered in XI and for which I thank you, but this is the first time I address a question to a common issue, written already about.
I have a scenario with 1 File FTP sender adapter and 2 Receiver adapters:1 FTP adapter and 1 MAIL adapter. The input message is sent to one of these receiver adapters based on the value taken by a specific field from the input message.The receiver adapters are using the same party and service.
The requirement is to solve this without using BPM.
I have read "multiple receiver" issue related blogs and tried to use the standard receiver determination. Thus, I have 1 Sender Agreement, 2 Receiver agreements (one for FTP and one for MAIL), 1 Interface Determinations (with the 2 inbound interfaces and interface mappings corresponding to FTP and MAIL output) and 1 standard Receiver Determination where I added the party and service twice and specified for both the condition. The condition is based on XPath, is correct.
In sxmb_moni, I get the error: "No receiver could be determined". If I remove one of the conditions, then the output is sent on both receiver adapters, instead of only the one that fulfills the condition.
Can you please give me some feedback on how to solve this problem? It is rather urgent.
I have also tried to create 2 Interface Determinations and have 2 Receiver Determinations, each one with the right condition. But I get the same error message.
Is the problem due to the fact that I don't use 2 different services ?
If you know how this can be solved without using BPM, please reply.
Thanks a lot,
Alina hudea

> In sxmb_moni, I get the error: "No receiver could be determined". If I remove one of the conditions, then the output is sent on both receiver adapters, instead of only the one that fulfills the condition.
Hi,
I think the problem in Receive Determination. As you mentioned when you remove one of the condition then it works..
What I concluded is, I think while creating your Receiver Determination for multiple receivers you added the receivers by pressing the plus sign and that means you are using mulitiple receivers with "AND" condition, so in this condition when both the condition will be true then only you will get success.
What you can do is, Just remove one of the receivers and then add it by pressing the "OR" symbol i.e. by pressing this ( [ ] ) symbol and put your conditions as you like.
I hope what I have concluded is correct..
Regards,
Sarvesh

Same send step for multiple receivers:   BPM scenario

Hi forum,
I have a file -BPM -file scenario,
from the BPM i need to send the same message to multiple Business systems,
so, i need to make receiver determinations in the IB_directory, but it allows me to have only 1 receiver determination for a set of Sender service and message interface,   so how can i have multiple receivers in the receiver determination...
i have gone through a blog which asks me to make use of "SEND CONTEXT" in the send step in the BPM and query it in the receiver determination in the IB-directory, but how to quey it?   pls help
thanks

hi,
For a set of one business system and receiver u can create only one Receiver determination step.
If Want to send messages to different receivers.
Go to -> Integration Directory-> Open the receiver determination step in change mode.
Go to "Configured Receiver" step -> Click on "+" symbol to add other receivers
"Conditions" is an optional tab.
Then configure receiver interface determination and receiver agreement for the new receiver
Regards,
Shabari

Multiple Receivers one is sync, others async

Hi,
I have a scenario where sender is a third party system.
Sender system sends XML Payload using HTTP to XI.
This payload needs to be received by 3 receivers. 1. File, 2. Email and 3. RFC.
(i.e. Once XML Payload is received into XI, XML File needs to be created, Email needs to be sent with attached XML payload and RFC needs to be called.)
File and Email receivers are asynchronous but RFC needs to be called in synchronous mode and response from RFC is sent back to sender third party system.
Third Party (XML Payload, using HTTP) --> XI --> File, Email, RFC
RFC Response ---> XI --> Third party.
How to achieve this complete scenario? Do I need to use BPM for this? If yes, how do I configure it? Its a case of parallel multiple receivers out of which only one receiver sends response back to the calling system.
Thanks,
Smita

You need to use bpm.
1. Http Sender sends request to XI.
2. XI converts it into XI Message.
3. BPM receives the request through synchronous interface.(Opens S/A Bridge)
4. BPM sends request to RFC through Synchronous interface and gets the response.
5. Response is sent back to Http Client.(Closes S/A Bridge)
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1134http [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]://www.riyaz.net/blog/index.php/2008/04/16/a-step-by-step-guide-to-bpm-asynch-sync-bridge/

Can you use sync on multiple computers at the same time? ie have someone else logged into your firefox account for you whilst you are also logged in

I am trying to sign up to something but there is only a short window so was going to ask a friend to sign in at the same time using my account to try to sign up (with my password being saved into my firefox account)

Hi. Yes, you can use Sync on multiple devices at the same time. I use it to keep my bookmarks in sync across my desktop and Android versions of Firefox.

Multiple DMVPN Instances on Same WAN Interface

Hi Folks,
Is it possible to run Multiple DMVPN Instances on a single WAN Interface ? Can we for example configure 3 Tunnels on a Router using one same WAN Interface but running separate EIGRP Instances for each Tunnel ? Kindly let me know , Alioune

Hi Alioune,
Yes you can create DMVPN as you said with one WAN interface that is possible..... you can have multiple tunnel interfaces pointed to a WAN interface as the source interface which resides in public zone..... with different public ip's as the destination tunnel...
interface Tunnel1
description ** A-VPN Tunnel **
bandwidth 100000
ip vrf forwarding red
ip address 10.0.252.2 255.255.255.252
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip mtu 1500
load-interval 60
tunnel source GigabitEthernet0/0 (WAN Interface)
tunnel destination 1.1.1.1
tunnel protection ipsec profile dmvpn
interface Tunnel1
description ** B-VPN Tunnel **
bandwidth 100000
ip vrf forwarding red
ip address 10.0.252.5 255.255.255.252
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip mtu 1500
load-interval 60
tunnel source GigabitEthernet0/0 (WAN Interface)
tunnel destination 2.1.1.1
tunnel protection ipsec profile dmvpn
like the above..... shown sample...
Please rate if the given information helps!!!

Synchronous Interface to Multiple Receivers

Hi all,
I have the following scenario working great SAP Proxy call out to a Soap Adapter receive the response and update SAP.
So a single synchronous call to one receiver is working great.
However I'd like the ability to also publish this information to another system (aynchronously).
Question can a synchronous interface send to more than one receiver?
I've read a number of blogs on the the issue the closest two are below but are a little old.
I'm on PI 7.1 and wondering whether there's something new I could potentially use message mappings, operation mappings or multiple service interfaces to serve the problem.
Please note: I can do this in a BPM but I would prefer not to use a BPM.
Regards,
John
Related Blogs
Enhanced Receiver Determination in Synchronous Senarios - Posted on Dec. 11, 2007
/people/jin.shin/blog/2007/12/11/sap-netweaver-process-integration-enhanced-receiver-determination-for-synchronous-scenarios
Multimapping without BPM - Posted on Feb. 07, 2006
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible

Hi,
I support stefan synchronous interface cannot be sent to multiple receivers...
there are lot of questions if at all if need to be supported like how to trace back the hopId for response to the request made..
lot of other things too..
Rajesh

Multiple Servers with same Remote Interface?

Is it possible to declare the same remote interface on multiple RMI servers? Secondly, is it possible to pick which RMI server will manage a particular request?
In other words, imagine if multiple servers could service a particular request that has the same signature, but the client wants to specify which server to send the invocation. An example would be the following:
public String getPhoneNumber(String pLastName) ;But the client should decide that server A should manage requests of last names starting with A-G, server B should handle H-P, and server C should handle Q-Z. The remote method invocation is the same, but the server upon which is should be invoked needs to be determined at runtime.
I realize this can be done multiple ways, with an interim proxy server that designates the server. However, I'm most interested in the ability within the RMI and/or JNDI standard to select and invoke methods on a particular server.
Thanks for any help.

"Server" is a little bit vague in this context.
My assumption is that you want separate RMI servers running on separate hosts. (Otherwise, why bother with multiple "servers"?)
That being said, it's not clear to me how you would expect RMI to sort out something as application-specific as you suggest. It sounds to me like you need your own registry/redirector. This is going to either be an rmiregistry rewrite by you, or - as was suggested by another poster - a proxy.

Multiple receivers asynchronous interface

HI,
I have a scenario wherein a third party sends file to ECC and some validations are being done at the ECC and a count of the records that have errors, count of records that are processed and a count of the success records are being spit out of SAP as email. Also, a file with those error records are being sent out.
Now, my question is....I will not be sending the file back if there are no error records but email notification will be sent no matter what so that it includes the total records processed, failed (0 in this case), and success.
When I use the same outbound proxy, is that possible to accomplish ?
I mean the situation wherein I will not be sending file but I will be sending email. I have the same outbound interface in both the cases i.e to send emails as well as to send the file back.
That will be great if someone could shed some light on this. Also, is there anyway I can include the file name that is being sent to SAP in the mapping so that I can mention that in the email saying "Following is the file that was sent..and it has so and so error records...."
Many thanks.

Nothing much to think about. Create 180+ communication channels and same number of receiver agreements and interface determinations!
If you feel that all the 50 FTP servers are part of the same business system, create 1 receiver determination and 180 interface determintions. It might look a bit less messy.
I have worked in other middleware products. Frankly, this is not how others work!!!! They provide provisions for changing any parameter of a communication channel at runtime.
All the best,
kk

Multiple WLANs pointing to same WLC interface

I would like to have a guest Web auth based WLAN that points to an Interface that I also have configured for a separate 802.1X authentication that allows access to my private network. I should note that I already have web auth configured for Guest access that only allows Internet access via separate WALN/VLAN. This would allow me to setup access for a vendor that is on-site using the Lobby Ambassador .
Is this possible and what do I need to do? I have created the seperate WLAN with Web auth and pointed it to the same WLC interface that I use for the 802.1X and this does not seem to work.

This has been resolved. I found I had AP groups setup and had not added the WALN to the correct group.

Multiple Business Systems for Multiple Receivers?

hi,
idoc > xi -> multiple receivers with xml payload
I have a scenario where i have to configure multiple receivers for each Supplier from an IDOC. All the receivers will be either HTTP or SOAP.
When the mapping would be the same for all the Suppliers but during configuration we have to determine the receiver based on an IDOC value to route the xml via HTTP or SOAP
For this to achieve do we have to create multiple business systems for each receiver?
If i create a receiver in the business service how can we determine the interface mapping in this scenario?
Thanks,
Tirumal

Hi Tirumal,
<i>For this to achieve do we have to create multiple business systems for each receiver?</i>
As you know,Business system is a logical name for the Techincal Systems, Theoretcially it is not required to create different Business systems for the each receivers.
Generally Business Systems are grouped/created based on the Business Process/Functionality/Type of Receivers etc.
So if you think, your each receiver is of type different type/process then create different Business systems.
It depends~
If you create Business Service, then you need to add your Message Interfaces explicitly into the Business Service( By open the Business Service->You can see the Sender/Receiver Interface tabs).
Hope this helps,
regards,
moorthy

BPM problem with sync interface.

Hi
I got one Abstract/Async and one sync interface in my BPM and I'm getting MESSAGE_NOT_USED error between them, my scenario is RFC to JDBC to RFC(response with different FM) so BPM receives data from RFC sender through Abstract/Async interface but after that interface, I'm getting the that error (MESSAGE_NOT_USED), the weird thing is I got another scenario almost same and its working, I did a new project with exactly the same interfaces, Mappings, interface det., Receiver det., senders and receivers but I'm still getting the same error, even I tried "RFC scenario using BPM--Starter Kit" Blog but same thing, btw everthing is 0 in SXI_CACHE, I'm going to go mad or something, please help..
Thanks

CALL FUNCTION 'Z_TSSI_INTERFACE_DUMMY'
     IN BACKGROUND TASK
      as separate unit
     DESTINATION 'TSSI_OUTBOUND1'
EXPORTING
    jobno              = jno
    PERSNO             = pers
    BEGDA              = '20051231'
    ENDDA              = '20051231'
    ABSTYPE            = 'xx'
    ABSHOURS           = '7'
    ABSDAYS            = '1'
    FULLORHALF         = 'false'
    uname              = sy-uname
    date               = '20060201'
    time               = '110000'
TABLES
    RETURN             = ret
    Commit Work.
The thing is this abap is working in another scenario, but when I copy the exacly the same scenario, it doesnt work, its weird, btw I noticed that evertime I run any scenario, short dump occurs, its about RFC authorization for XIRWBUSER user but I got the OSS note for that, I applied it but it didnt solve the problem, btw this short dump happens when I run my workign scenario as well.. this is driving me crazy..

Same idoc to multiple EDI receiver system using rule

Dear Friends!
Good day! I am using desadv.delvry03 idoc and I want to send same idoc from same communication component to multiple receiver parties without mapping.
I have created first scenario successfully using idoc, when I create another scenario it gives me message like "Object already exist" . for that I have to use Service interface. I dont want to use service interface for this purpose. In my scenarios mapping is not even required. one idoc to and multiple receivers thats it.
Can you please guide me how to do the above requirement ?
your any help will be appreciated greatly
Thanking you
Regards
Dipen

Hi,
For this... U can create 1 sender agreent for that idoc if necesseary....otherwise we dont required IDOC sender Agreement.
Then Create 1 reciver determination in that u can mention the 2 recivers details...
same thing for interface determination also.
and finally create 2 reciver agreement and 2 reciver communication channels for 2 systems.
Let me know if you require any further information.
Thanks,
Sreenivas

Nokia E71 sync cause multiple calender entries

I've got a Nokia E71 and every time I sync between my PV (Windows XP) , Nokia E71 and my iMac i seem to get multiple calender instances of mainly repeating calender notes as birthdays and national holidays. I've tried to remove all the contacts with birthdays from my PC. When re-syncing the multiple calendar items will show up again. Seems that the PC and Mac read the calendar notes differently and hence after every synchronization add the same calendar series of i.e birtdays. Any solution to this annoying problem ?

if you are only having a few of the units with the challenges, check to see if there has been any other apps installed that may have affected the MfE that you installed on them to interface wtih your exchange server.
if there are no challenges there, then i would suggest uninstalling the MfE on the devices and then rebooting the device and then reinstalling it back on the device and setting it up again.
i had the problem only one time in the past and changing the settings seemed not to fix it at all. but restarting the process did.
also, there could have been an issue with the coveraget those employees were in with thier handsets which could have prevented the unit from syncing, causing internal confusion, then trying again and backlogging the transfer....just a theory...as sometimes the network locks the data connection and while it shows that it is connected, it is frozen.
may be a good idea to see where those affected units are "travleing" in relationship to each other to see if the coverage as stated above is an issue.

Same sync interface, multiple receivers

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for