Sample rate is resetted by recording program

E-MU locked.jpg
Hi,
I try to record some of my old DAT (digital audio tape) recordings to PC (Vista) using the E-MU 0404. Sample rate 48 kHZ, sync source external, locked; I can hear the sound coming from earphones connected tot the E-MU device.
Then when I try to record, the sample rate is reset automatically to 44.1 kHz. No sound is coming from the earphones anymore; the blue 'locked' signal is out and there is no signal shown in the meters of the recording program. This happens with Ableton Live (Free download) as well as Adobe Soundbooth CS4 and Audacity 2.0. What can I do to prevent the E-MU device being reset?
greetings from The Hague, Holland

Resolved.
The trick is in the Windows Sound Settings, Digital Input:
WindowsDigitalInput.jpg
Signal at the microphone input of the E-MU can be recorded.

Similar Messages

  • E-MU 0204 for Vinyl Recording: Missing Sampling Rates Using Windows 7 Drivers?

    Hi all,
    Just so you know, the primary use for the E-MU 0204 is to convert the mounds of LPs I have into digital format (either 88.2 or 96 kHz sampling at 24 bit). Having said that, I'm going through a lot of growing pains with the E-MU 0204 unit I just purchased. The specs of my setup is as follows:
    -Windows 7 Pro 64Bit 8GB ram
    -Stanton T.92 USB (with internal preamp removed)
    -Shure M97xE cartridge
    -ART DJ PreII Phono Preamp.
    As far as I can tell, the E-MU drivers are properly loaded onto the OS and in the Device Manager>Sound, and video game controllers, windows correctly identifies the unit as a "E-MU 0204 USB".
    From the specifications of the unit here:
    "Sample Rates: 44.1, 48, 88.2, 96, 176.4, 192kHz from internal crystal (no sample rate conversion)
    Bit Depth: 24-bit I/O, 32-bit processing
    USB Hi-Speed
    - Full 24-bit resolution at all sample rates
    - Stereo in, stereo out at all sample rates"
    Yet, in the "Recording Devices" of my OS, I get only the following choices:
    -2 channel, 16 bit, 88200 Hz (Studio Quality)
    -2 channel, 16 bit, 96000 Hz (Studio Quality)
    -2 channel, 16 bit, 176400 Hz (Studio Quality)
    -2 channel, 16 bit, 192000 Hz (Studio Quality)
    -2 channel, 24 bit, 44100 Hz (Studio Quality)
    -2 channel, 24 bit, 48000 Hz (Studio Quality)
    -2 channel, 24 bit, 96000 Hz (Studio Quality)
    -2 channel, 24 bit, 192000 Hz (Studio Quality).
    The 44.1 kHz/16 bit, 48 kHz/24 bit, 88.2 kHz/24 bit, and 176.4 kHz/24 bit modes seem to be missing.
    My preferred choice for recording LPs is to use 96/24 for LP music that I know will not be burned onto CD, and 88.2/24 for LP music I know may be burned onto CD in the future at some point.
    Am I missing something here? Please help!
    I'm pretty new to this whole E-MU interface stuff, so I appreciate your patience in advance.
    Thanks kindly,
    Andrew

    dgoh88 wrote:
    okay just got home, turned the PC back on and now all the sounds are distorted again. Tried completely disabling wireless ports, still the same. About to throw in the towl already
    There can be other high priority prcosses as well.
    Keep trying with DPC Latency Tool ...
    Also, you could try by
    - turning off all visual effects of O/S (incl. Aero)
    - turn off indexing service
    - launch perfmon.msc / system monitoring tool to see which processes uses CPU/etc.
    If you already uninstalled XP then why not install XP as well (dual boot system). Most audio interfaces works better on 32-bit XP compared to Vista/W7 & 64-bit systems.
    jutapa

  • OMF - Mixing Different Sample Rates

    Hello -
    So, I've got an OMF file from a FCP project that I opened in Logic and have been mixing without any issues. Interestingly, all of the audio files associated with this project are 44.1 kHz, but I am mixing in 48k. But everything is right (sounds right, looks right, syncs with video correctly).
    But... if I open the same files in an external editor or quicktime, they play back incorrectly. And if I save a file in a different program, even if it is still at 44.1, and bring it back into logic, it plays back incorrectly. This is problematic if I need to edit an audio file somewhere other than within logic (say I want to do some noise reduction in soundtrack pro).
    Anyone run into this issue or have any ideas about how this happened?

    There are a few ways to look at this.
    1) Regions in the arrange all play back at the session sample rate. Example: 44k session, 96k audio file in arrange=slower playback
    2) Logic automatically converts output sample rate so you can record independent of CA devices. Example: You have a session recorded at 96k, your interface is not connected, Logic will load Built in Audio, Logic runs tyhe sessions at 96k and converts the SRate of the session to match the supported sample rate. So you can run sessions at unsupported sample rates, this rarely makes sense if you cannot capture your audio at session sample rate (if needed).
    3) There are a few other options for handling this, such as EXS24, which automatically handles SRC.
    4) When Importing Audio Files there is a song preference which you can en/disable to automatically convert SR upon import.
    I think your friend may have referred to point #2 and it was interpreted as point #1...perhaps. Hope this clears things up. J

  • Changing sample rate

    when I start to record a new project, sometimes it doesn't read any level coming in. Also, if it is responding, but then I try to change the sample rate before beginning to record, it also won't show any level. I'm using a MOTU 896.

    When you change your sample rate, you then have to relaunch the audio engine (go to Audio > Audio Hardware and Drivers, uncheck, and then recheck the "Enabled" box, and then choose "Try re-launch" from the following dialog).

  • Sample rate of Logic?

    I am exporting from Logic at48khz and wondered what is the highest quality I can export at...what is the sample rate at which Logic records?
    My Motu 828 wont play at 48 khz tho...should it or is 44.1 its maximum?
    I export to FCPX

    xfggfx wrote:
    I am exporting from Logic at48khz and wondered what is the highest quality I can export at...what is the sample rate at which Logic records?
    My Motu 828 wont play at 48 khz tho...should it or is 44.1 its maximum?
    I export to FCPX
    The sample rate is determined by the setting on your audio interface, not by Logic. That setting should be mirrored in your project settings. And although I don't have a MOTU, I know it can do 48 kHz. You may want to consult its' manual for that. I also know that 48 kHz is its' highest possible setting. Logic can record any sampling frequency  - but the Audio Interface has to be able to provide it.
    http://www.motu.com/techsupport/manuals

  • Sample rate and data recording rate on NI Elvis

    I am currently working on a project that requires me to record my data at 1ms intervals or less. Currently the lowest timing interval I can record is at 10ms. If I change my wait timer to anything below 10 the recorded data in excel will skip time. For example instead of it starting at 1 ms and counting 2,3,4,5,6...,etc. It is skipping from 2,5,12,19,....,etc. So my question is if it is a limitation that I have reached on the NI Elvis or if it is possibly a problem with how I've created my LabVIEW code. My program from an operational stand point is working great, but it is my data recording that is causing me to not be able to move to my testing phase. Any help on this matter would be greatly appreciated.
    Other information that might be relevant:
    Operating System: Windows 7
    Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31245 @ 3.00 GHz
    Memory: 12GB
    DirectX Version: 11
    Attachments:
    Count Digital(mod12).vi ‏76 KB

    Hi crashdx,
    So my immediate thought on this issue is that the code inside your primary while loop might be taking too long to process to achieve such a high sample rate. Especially when making calls into external applications (such as Excel) which can take a large amount of itme. 
    There is a very useful debugging tool called the Performance and Memory tool. If you aren't familiar with this tool, it will allow you to see how much memory the various chunks of your code are using and, more importantly here, how much time each subVI is taking to execute. Does the code inside your while loop take longer than 1ms to run? If so, then you will definitely see unwanted logging behavior and will need to change your approach. Would it be possible to collect more than a single sample at a time and perform calculations on a large number of samples at once before writing them to Excel in bigger chunks?
    I've included a link to the LabVIEW helpful detailing the Profile Performance and Memory tool.
    http://zone.ni.com/reference/en-XX/help/371361H-01/lvdialog/profile/
    I would first try and figure out how long it's taking your loop code to execute and go from there.
    I hope this helps!
    Andy C.
    Applications Engineer
    National Instruments

  • Recording LP records as source material- Sample Rate

    Using recorded tracks from LP records to make DVDs, Blu-Ray DVDs or simple CD's. Am not sure what maximum sample rate to use. I understand the end product limits of the various digital media, but LPs are analog. Do I gain any sound quality by recording the original LP at a sample rate higher than 48000/32bit, say 96000 sample rate) and then resampling (downsizing) the audio file if the end product cannot produce the higher sample rate?

    Conversion de LP -Archivos Digitales
    Se recomienda Grabalos  con estas velocidad de Muestreo
    Blue-Ray 96000Hrz. / 32 bits
    DVD & 48000 Hrz. /32 Bits
    CD DE AUDIO A 44100Hrz /32 Bits ó 24Bits
    Te recomendaria Cambiarte a Adobe Audition
    Saludos
    http://soundcloud.com/creativoxpro/restaurando-audio-de-un-vinil
    Para audio
    8000 muestras/s
    Teléfonos, adecuado para la voz humana pero no para la reproducción musical. En la práctica permite reproducir señales con componentes de hasta 3,5 kHz.
    22050 muestras/s
    Radio En la práctica permite reproducir señales con componentes de hasta 10 kHz.
    32000 muestras/s
    Vídeo digital en formato miniDV.
    44100 muestras/s
    CD, En la práctica permite reproducir señales con componentes de hasta 20 kHz. También común en audio en formatos MPEG-1 (VCD,SVCD, MP3).
    47250 muestras/s
    Formato PCM de Nippon Columbia (Denon). En la práctica permite reproducir señales con componentes de hasta 22 kHz.
    48000 muestras/s
    Sonido digital utilizado en la televisión digital, DVD, formato de películas, audio profesional y sistemas DAT.
    50000 muestras/s
    Primeros sistemas de grabación de audio digital de finales de los 70de las empresas 3M y Soundstream.
    96000 ó 192400 muestras/s
    HD DVD, audio de alta definición para DVD y BD-ROM (Blu-ray Disc).
    2 822 400 muestras/s
    SACD, Direct Stream Digital, desarrollado por Sony y Philips.
    Para vídeo
    50 Hz
    Vídeo PAL.
    60 Hz
    Vídeo NTSC.
    *informacion extraida para apoyo de la pregunta en el foro // http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frecuencia_de_muestreo
    > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sampling_rate

  • Record data at one sample rate and calculate velocity

    I need to record position data at a sample rate of 10 hz but I would like to calculate velocity every half a second.  What is the best way to do this so the velocity display does not jump?  I want to capture quick responses but I would also like to calculate the velocity over a longer period of time like 1 minute. 

    I am trying to calculate vertical speed based on pressure altitude data.  I am using serial communication to measure pressure at 10 Hz.  I am using Labview 8.2 for all of the calculations and measurements. 
    I am looking for some way to average the data over some time interval that I have yet to determine.  I want to be able to see any major pressure changes whithin about .5 seconds but I also need to see trends over a longer time period say 2 to 10 seconds. 
    I have thought about using an array and then averaging the array or implimenting a rolling digital filter. 

  • Transferring music recorded at 32kHz sampling rate

    In my project transferring music from DAT tapes to HD, I've run into a problem. A few tapes were recorded at 32kHz sampling rate for longer recording time.
    STP can record at 32kHz so in theory I can transfer music digitally. But there is no sound when I monitor the tape and the Audio MIDI setup doesn't have a 32kHz option to choose for recording.
    Can someone steer me in the right direction to get this music off the tapes? Is recording to the line analogue input the only way?

    The problem is not with STP, the problem is with the hardware. if you want to record at 32Khz, you'll need an audio interface that is 32Khz compatible and I don't think the Mac's built-in audio is. Otherwise, we could select that in the AudioMidi Setup.

  • How to set accurate sampling rate in FPGA programming.

    Hi all,
           I'm using cRIO 9004 and NI 9233 for acquiring high speed analog inputs. Module 9233 specify some data rate values which can be programmed. I want to acquire data without missing a single sample. please comment on this.

    Couple things to add to what Mike said:
    For C Series modules like the NI 9233 when used on the CompactRIO platform, all configuration and programming is done from within LabVIEW.
    To configure the data rate at which the 9233 will acquire data, you need to either get into the module's properties page (in LabVIEW) and set it there, or you programmatically do it by using a LV FPGA property node on the module. I suggest you look at the examples that ship with CompactRIO for the 9233.
    JMota

  • On the fence for which sample rate to record at (44.1 vs 96)

    Been reading tons of posts on the sampe rate debate.  My friends (across the country) and I are about to start to collaborate on the great American rock album that we didn't quite get right back in the day in college.  I'll be running the show sending them scratch tracks with clicks so they can lay down individual tracks and I'll import them.
    I'm torn on which sample rate(s) to use -- and want the best quality possible, of course.  I've boiled it down to the following pros per sample rate.  Any advice/comments much appreciated.  thanks
    44.1 Pros
    - Friends across the country can use GarageBand (44.1kHz is max) to lay down a single track and send to me to import into Logic Pro and mix (and will match up)
    - GarageBand is free, Logic Pro is $199; Apogee JAM is $99, Jam96kHz is $129
    - GarageBand requires fewer resources (1GB RAM vs 4GB for Logic Pro) so they don’t have to have beefy Macs
    - Smaller file size to post/share (Dropbox cost per/storage size)
    - Picture mixing a bunch of 44.1 tracks vs a bunch of 96 tracks even if on my beefy Mac running Logic Pro; fan running, gasping for air etc?
    96 Pros
    - 96 sounds noticeably better than 44.1?
    - While 44.1 standard for CDs, that’s no longer how music is largely distributed
    - Should always record to max resolution you can be “future proofed”?
    - Current lossy formats support up to 48kHz so 96kHz good as will cut cleanly in half when bouncing
    88.2 Pros
    - Maybe choose this so friends using GarageBand can record at 44.1 so upscales more cleanly?  But then bouncing down to 48kHz not as clean? (I don’t recall Logic Pro allowing me to choose 44.1 for bounce rate.. always says 48 for MP3/M4A)
    thanks!

    rcook349 wrote:
    44.1 Pros
    - Friends across the country can use GarageBand (44.1kHz is max) to lay down a single track and send to me to import into Logic Pro and mix (and will match up)
    - GarageBand is free, Logic Pro is $199; Apogee JAM is $99, Jam96kHz is $129
    - GarageBand requires fewer resources (1GB RAM vs 4GB for Logic Pro) so they don’t have to have beefy Macs
    - Smaller file size to post/share (Dropbox cost per/storage size)
    - Picture mixing a bunch of 44.1 tracks vs a bunch of 96 tracks even if on my beefy Mac running Logic Pro; fan running, gasping for air etc?
    96 Pros
    - 96 sounds noticeably better than 44.1?
    - While 44.1 standard for CDs, that’s no longer how music is largely distributed
    - Should always record to max resolution you can be “future proofed”?
    - Current lossy formats support up to 48kHz so 96kHz good as will cut cleanly in half when bouncing
    88.2 Pros
    - Maybe choose this so friends using GarageBand can record at 44.1 so upscales more cleanly?  But then bouncing down to 48kHz not as clean? (I don’t recall Logic Pro allowing me to choose 44.1 for bounce rate.. always says 48 for MP3/M4A)
    thanks!
    44.1 kHz still is pretty much standard for MP3's.
    Your friends/collaborators can pretty much use any application that can record PCM (or even MP3) audio; even if they're not playing to a steady tempo, you can line everything up in Logic, with flex.
    Using Garageband and one set tempo should also work. Just remember that you cannot open Logic files in Garageband, only Garageband files in Logic. The Audio Files recorded by either, can be used (imported) by either.
    Higher sampling rates will not "future proof" anything. In fact, that whole concept is flawed. Your best bet for now is simply 44.1 kHz 24 bit uncompressed PCM files in their most widely used form: AIFF or WAV.
    96 does not noticeably sound better than 44.1, unless you have a top end interface and a very delicate and very complicated mix, and admirably acute hearing. In some interfaces 96 or 88.2 have been found to sound worse than 44.1, because of clocking inaccuracies getting progressively worse at higher sampling frequencies. I would stick to 44.1, it has lots of practical advantages (as you pointed out), and the sonic difference with 96 kHz is marginal at best, and certainly not worth the price: "double" rates need double the CPU power for any plugin processing. That's the biggest loss. Half a Mac.
    Bitdepth on the other hand does make a significant difference. There is no reason not to record everything at 24 bits. Shorter: always record at 24 bits.
    O, also just spotted your remark about Logic not "letting you" bounce MP3/M4a to 44.1 kHz. You must remember incorrectly, because I never bounce MP3 or AAC to any other frequency than 44.1 kHz. However, it may be that this rate is tied to the projects' sampling frequency as set in the project settings, and the last time I used 48 kHz was in LP 8. I'll check that now.

  • Changing audio recording depth and sample rate in QuickTime Pro?

    Last week, I set up QuickTime Pro 7.4.5 to record audio in 24-bit, 48 KHz format -- only now, I can't remember how I did that. I think that I may have used some other software to change the settings of my Mac Pro's built-in sound card. Does anyone know how to do this?
    I made several such recordings, just last week, as a test, simply using a microphone plugged directly into my Mac Pro, and using QuickTime Pro as the recording application. During playback of such QuickTime audio files, I can hit <command-i> to see that the recordings are indeed 24-bit, 48 KHz. But now, when I repeat the same process, my QuickTime audio recordings are made with 16-bit resolution, at 44.1 KHz. I remember putting the settings back to those values after my recording session of last week. But I can't remember how I adjusted those settings. Does anyone know how to do that?
    Thanks.

    Thanks for your response.
    I will use Apple MIDI Setup, as you suggest.
    I want to change the sample rate to 48 KHz, as the final destination is DVD and I don't want to convert from 44.1 to 48 and thus suffer a possible loss in quality.
    As for bit depth, I want to sample at 24-bit, since I'll be processing the sound afterwards and don't want audible rounding errors during the number "crunching". Afterwards, I'll just drop the eight least significant bits, or perhaps round them up or down (to zero or 256).

  • Audigy 2 NX recording sample rate question

    Hi, I have two questions about the sample rate used when recording in the Audigy 2 NX -
    When recording an analog signal (Line In), is the actual?sampling rate at which the analog signal is being sampled different from the requested sample rate ? For example, when recording at XX Khz, does the actual sampling of the analog signal really?happen at XX Khz or does it get sampled at a different fixed rate(48khz?) and then gets re-sampled to XX Khz ?
    When recording a digital signal (spdif in), if the recording sampling rate specified is the same as the sampling rate of the input signal then does the card record this digital input signal in a bit-perfect fashion ? For example, if the digital input signal is 6bit and 44.Khz, and the recording is also being done at 6bit and 44.Khz then does the card actually record the signal at exactly that rate without modifying the data in any way ? or does it record it at a different rate and then re-sample internally to arri've at the requested recording rate ?
    Now I know this card works a little different in terms of re-sampling when the 'Digital Input only' checkbox is checked. So I am looking for the answers to these questions keeping in my mind this option as well.
    Thanks!
    Message Edited by whatcreative on 02-8-2009 08: PMMessage Edited by whatcreative on 02-8-2009 08: PM

    thanks for your replies.
    katman,
    I checked that thread. Although I wonder if the same thing applies to recording at rates higher than 48khz as well ?as I am more interested in finding out if when recording 96khz does the signal really get sampled at true 96khz or something else ? But, Upsampling a recording (not playback)?to a higher frequency doesn't make sense?because you can't create what you lost by recording at a?lower sampling rate. A test for checking this would be to try and record a signal that has frequency content well above 24khz but less than 48khz. If that content gets captured that means it is indeed recording at 96khz, if it gets lost then its recording at 48khz.
    flipflop,
    I have opened up the soundcard and messed around with a lot. Here's a list of the chips alongwith their descriptions based on whatever I could find?about them -
    Sigmatel STAC9460S - Codec
    JRC 4556A - Headphone output opamp
    ST MC33078 - Line level output/input dual opamp. (Total 4).
    Philips UDA334 - Low Power DAC
    Philips ISP58BD - USB device controller
    Creative CA086 - DSP
    Cirrus Logic EP7309 - High-Performance, Low-Power System-on-Chip Enhanced Digital Audio Interface
    ST M29W400BB - 4Mbit Flash Memory
    ST LD33 - 3.3v regulator (?)
    ST LD8 - .8v regulator (?)
    Although the datasheet of the codec suggests that it supports all sampling rates, I'd have to dig deeper to really find out if it is handicapped to only one standard rate for recording - http://www.alsa-project.org/~james/d...tac9460-ds.pdf
    Message Edited by whatcreative on 02-2-2009 :35 AM

  • I'm trying to record in Adobe Audition and it keeps saying my the sample rates for my input and output devices do not match.  How do I correct this?

    I'm trying to record in Audition and it keeps saying my sample rates for the input and output devices don't match.  How do I fix this?

    I finally have communication between the ISA One and Audition. I moved the optic cable to another SPDIF on the computer and from the SPDIF to ADAT on the ISA One and it finally agreed that the communication was at the same clock speed. The audio was not intelligible so I moved the optic cable back to the original configuration and I can record voice that is clean.          

  • Changing sample rates for recorded audio?

    I've been trying to record VO through premiere. I'm using an m-audio mobile pre which has never given me trouble in any other application. When i turn on Meter Input(s) Only from the panel menu of the track mixer i can clearly see the input move in time and responsively. When I record however the resulting clip is much shorter than the ammount of time recorded and the audio is all garbled and chopped. It clearly jumps out to me as a sample rate problem. I looked at the clips and they are 44.1 but the sequence i'm recording to is 48. I made a 44.1 sequence and recorded to that which worked fine but there must be a way to change the recording sample rate right? I can't find a solution anywhere. Anybody know?

    i'm just following up here. Thanks for the replies. I understood i would lose data as one answer suggests, but i wanted to convert it so i could work in a new song environment in which all the NEW tracks were recorded at 192. So the second answer was very helpful. incidentally, with further research we are recording at 96.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Best Practice Agregate Tables for agregate awarness ..

    Hello, the question i m facing now is how to improve performance trough agregate awarness. How to plan the agregate tables in order to get the best covering for reporting requirments ? How to realize maximum use of agregate tables and minimum use of

  • Can someone suggest an affordable external hard drive for use with FCPX and video editing on my Macbook Pro Retina

    I have a Macbook Pro Retina from 2012 and I only got the 250GB hard drive.  I'm getting ready to purchase a Panosonic HC-X920 to use with Final Cut Pro X already installed on my laptop.  Since I know the file sizes are going to be so big, can anyone

  • Reader XI: after opening a pdf I get black areas in the doc when scrolling down

    Hello, I have a problem with acrobat reader XI after a new installation of my hdd. After opening a pdf, I get black areas in the pdf when I scroll down. The black area disspear when scrolling up. What can I do? Win7 Prof 64bit Many thanks in advance

  • Interactive reports

    1)How to move from any list to any list ? 2)when v r calling a transaction from report in interactive report, will it be counted as a secondary list?

  • Date to Period

    Hi My requirement is date to period for that i wrritten the customer exit variable. Now my requirment is suppose user input date is belongs to 3rd period (11.06.2010) that  i need to show all the three period in my report.  pls correct my code WHEN '