Samsung nx200 raw support

I can't get Lightroom3.4.1 to read samsung's raw files.  in sRGB or adobeRGB.  This is the new NX 200.  But since it is supposed to support NX100, one would think NX 200 should be the same format. Any suggestions on how what to do.  The samsung converter makes for a clumsy workflow.  thx.

I do in RAW, than import SRW to Samsung Raw Converter. I set the correct white balance, sharpen. and exports to TIFF.
After a suitable set of parameters is somewhat smaller TIF - so it will retain all of them do DNG.
It seems to me that the TIF has better quality than JPG.
Anyway I look forward to the support for SRW from NX200

Similar Messages

  • Samsung NX100 RAW Support?

    I've been trying to use Aperture with the Samsung NX100.  In most conditions there is too much red/magenta.  In some photos it is absolutely out of control.  For example, a couple of indoor portraits had the person's face bright magenta, and a pine cabinet was bright orange/pink.
    There are spikes in the RGB histogram that don't appear in the JPEG.  I shoot RAW+JPEG combos, and the JPEGs are absolutely fine as far as colour goes.
    Auto white-balance doesn't fix it, neither does careful white-balance adjustment or eye-dropper based white balance adjustment.  I've tried adjusting the colour, and I can't seem to fix it that way either, for example I can get a flat wood floor to look right but then some toys on the floor actually look like blown channels.  I've also tried applying Curves to R, G, and B channels separately.  No luck.  I've given up trying to find a preset that will even work for a single photo.
    I tried a trial version of Lightroom and everything looks great there, including showing the camera's white balance setting.
    What is the status of NX100 support? Will there be an update?

    Thank you Clem, for the response.  I hope the update will come soon.
    For the benefit of others, I would like to mention that in the meantime, as a workaround I convert the files to Adobe DNG using the latest version of Adobe's DNG Converter.  Aperture 3 is able to work with the DNG files just fine.

  • Camera raw and Samsung NX200

    When will a  Camera Raw version that supports the Samsung NX200  be expected ?
    greetings, Theo

    Camera Raw is rev'ed 3-4 time/year. That camera isn't supported that I can tell in the ACR 6.6 RC, perhaps it'll be in the final release.

  • Raw support of cameras without upgrading?

    Hopefully this is a simple question, but I can't find he info anywhere.
    I have a Samsung EX1/TL500 which can create raw files (now supported in LR3.2rc).
    I use lightroom 2.7
    Will I need to upgrade to Lightroom 3.2 to use the raw support for the Samsung Ex1 or is there a way to update raw camera support in LR2.7 without upgrading to LR3.2?
    Thanks in advance,
    Phil

    Hi Phil,
    You can download the free DNG converter, convert the files to DNG then open them in 2.7.
    You won't have the same goodies as 3.2 such as the noise reduction and sharpenng, but you can work on them.
    These two alone made the upgrade reasonable for me.
    Rich
    Charley types faster than I do.

  • Samsung EX2F Raw Datei mit Aperture

    I am using Aperture 3 to organise my pictures.
    As a second camera I am using a Samsung EX2F.
    Aperture can´t import the .srw raw files from the camera.
    Has anybody got an idea how to manage them in Aperture?

    Aperture can´t import the .srw raw files from the camera.
    Really can't import? Or do you see the "unsupported image format" warning?
    What I am doing with unsupported raw files, is to convert them using Adobe's free dng converter and then to import the dngs. You could also use the camera's own software to convert the raw images to tiff or another lossless format and use these files in Aperture.
    Your camera is relatively new, so there may be hope, that Apple will release raw support for this camera. You might consider to shoot raw&jpeg for the time being and to import the images with the jpeg as the original.  Once raw support has been released, you can losslessly switch to the raw as original image file.
    Regards
    Léonie

  • EXPRESS: Why no raw support in Photoshop express from Revel?

    We just got back from a trip to Disneyland and I shot over 800 photos in raw format on my Canon camera. I uploaded the images using my iPad to Revel each night and tonight I am home and I opened Photoshop Express so I could send some photos to Walgreens and I see thumbnails of my images from Revel in PSE but when I try to open one, I get an error that Photoshop Express cannot open this file. I dug around some before I found a message from Patti on the forums that says that PSE does not support Raw Files. Come on guys, I am a premium subscriber and I have Raw support in Revel and yet PSE which has more editing options won't support the files. I wanted to tweak some and upload to walgreens to print and it's easier to do it from PSE than to have to use the camera roll and then Walgreens app. I also wanted to upload some to to Flickr which PSE support and Revel used to support but no longer does. What is going on Adobe? Why are all the cloud products so fragmented? I'm starting to consider just storing images on my NAS and using other apps to accomplish the tasks from my iPad because your cloud services are not making this easier.

    But InDesign has it as well and I think this is like the craziest omission I can think of and they have made some serious ones in the past.
    Hopefully the next version all the apps will have it and that in case there are any problems it will be done in the way so that it will not cause any unforeseen difficulties.
    thanks for the answer David. Good you can find a little time to visit here as with this thread we all guess and you know better.

  • RAW Support for Canon G9

    Looked at the RAW Support page this morning after the website was updated and it appears there were no updates to support the Canon G9. Is this correct? Or have some of you received software updates this morning.
    Thanks

    I've downloaded the Lightroom demo (my 3rd time) and imported 266 D300 RAW photos from a Sunday morning shoot. I prefer Aperture, but I'm giving LR another chance. It's not that bad. My problem is that all our Macs are on Tiger and I really don't want Leopard (I also run many programs simply not compatible with Leopard), so in all likelihood will have to switch to LR/PS, which is rapidly becoming the standard anyways. I have to say performance is much faster but the 5 workflow separations in the user experience is inefficient, an artificial "silo" approach. Apertures UI model is much more flexible and transparent.
    I'll wait this week out and see if anything happens...

  • Continued lack of RAW support

    I am really perplexed with Apple RAW support. I thought finally with the release of Aperture 3 they would finally get it right. I haven't been able to use Aperture before because they haven't support most of the cameras I've owned. Finally today they added the G1 - 16 months after the camera launched and on the eve of a new model release. I sort of understood that they needed to incorporate lens corrections BUT.....
    There is still no support of the GF1 - released in September 2009. Gheeez the files are the same as the G1. Lightroom has had support since day 1.
    I am really afraid to make Aperture my primary DAM and image editor until I can get comfortable that Apple is actually serious about supporting cameras as they are released. Not sure how to get Apple to understand that their audience for this product is an audience that tends to buy new camera gear. Waiting months or years for camera support makes Aperture unusable as a product.
    How do we get Apple to listen?

    teb, me too. I have owned the GF1 since September and have been waiting and waiting.
    Supporting only the G1 and GH1 makes no sense - it is the same raw format. I'm wondering if there is a way to get Aperture to ignore it. See this post on how a script can make EP1+EP2 files be read as an E30:
    http://www.apertureexpert.com/tips/2010/2/1/a-script-to-open-olympus-e-p1-e-p2-r aw-orf-files-in-aperture.html
    The only way to get Apple to listen is to go to the Aperture menu, then click Provide Aperture Feedback. Here's the direct link: http://www.apple.com/feedback/aperture.html
    This is the only channel that works and I think a lot of people either don't know it is there, or cannot be bothered.

  • Lost camera raw support for canon 1ds markI in mountain lion

    I seem to have lost system support for camera raw files for the original Canon 1ds (what you might call the markI). There's been two recent raw support updates, and I'm not sure if it occured with the first for those two updates or with update to Mountain Lion itself (which I recently clean-installed). I noticed it after the first raw support update (Digital Camera RAW Compatibility Update 4.01) but it could have happend with Mountain Lion install and I just didn't notice. In any case, I definitely don't have support for the camera raw files, finder shows only the generic TIFF icon thumnail (the raw files from the markI 1ds were of the extension .TIF, before canon moved on to .cr2 format..). Preview and Aperture can preview the file but without any custom white balance or other info stored with the raw file from camera.
    Anybody else experience this or know fix?
    Thanks!
    For anyone wanting and willing to test on their machine, I'll post a link to a test raw file.... hmm, apparently this support forum does not allow for the linclusion of a link to an image file, but I'll see if it allows for a link to a zipped folder with image inside... I suppose I wouldn't download a .zip file myself but for anyone braver than I:
    http://laglj.com/2012hirez/1dsTestFile.zip
    Thanks,
    Lane
    laglj.com

    Lane,
    That latest raw update also shows supported devices. The EOS-1Ds is still shown as supported by Mountain Lion in the knowledge base article that accompanies it. Bump!
    I wonder if using Disk Utility and verify/fix permissions may restore your RAW capability.
    Don't have Aperture or Lightroom.
    I installed the recent raw updates into 10.8.2. The DB5W2360.TIF file has a generic Preview icon. Graphic Converter 8.3.1 opens .cr2 files, and it opened this TIF file nicely as well. GC is willing to modify white balance with a condition that it cannot be done in place, and must be exported to a different format.
    Not much help, I know.

  • Why no raw support for Fuji XF-1?

    The XF-1 has the same sensor as the X10 so it should be easy enough to add to RAW support I think.

    Send Apple feedback. They won't answer, but at least will know there is a problem. If enough people send feedback, it may get the problem solved sooner.
    Feedback

  • Why no RAW support for the Fuji FinePix HS10?

    This camera is well over a year old.  Why is there no support for the RAW file?

    It is definitely not only Fuji. I used a Panasonic Lumix FX-150 before that has been supported by Adobe Camera Raw for quite some time now. I replaced that camera by a Lumix LX5, but I see that the FX-150 is still not supported by Apple Camera Raw and probably never will.
    If you want wide range RAW support, use Lightroom. (Not to say that Aperture doesn't have its strengths, e.g. support for geocoding.)

  • Why no RAW support for Fuji X10?

    The Fuji X10 has been on the market for almost a year now and there still is no RAW support for it in Aperture. Why?

    Only Apple can asnwer the "Why?" questions, I'm afriad.
    Aperture menu -> Provide Aperture Feedback and let them know you want it.

  • Olympus E-P3 Raw Support Question

    I recently purchased an Olympus E-P3. I thought that Aperture supported Raw format with this camera (at least according to Apple's own statements, it is supposed to be supported). But I loaded photos from my Olympus into Aperture and it just gave me a message that there were unsupported files and it did not import any of the raw files.
    So, does Aperture 3 support Olympus Raw or not? I read in other places that people were having to manually tell Aperture to reprocess files and somehow that worked. But I thought Raw support meant that raw files would upload directly into Aperture.
    What exactly does "raw support" mean if Aperture doesn't recognize Olympus ORF files?
    Thanks.
    Aperture 3.2.2
    Yes I just updated all my software including Aperture Raw support

    Looking at this page OS X Lion: Supported digital camera RAW formats the Olympus PEN E-P3 is show as supported by 10.7.2 so a few last things I can think to try:
    One is to do the steps listed in Aperture 3: Troubleshooting Basics. Doesn;t seem like this would be a library problem but you never know and the procedures don;t take much time.
    Would be to create a new library and try to import a RAW file into that just to try and narrow down where the problem is.
    Would be to create a new user on your system, log in as that user, run Aperture and try to import a RAW file for the same reason.
    Would be to post  RAW file on the net somewhere like dropbox so one of us could test it out on our systems to see if it behaves any differently.
    Finally a call to Apple to find out whats going on.
    good luck
    regards
    Message was edited by: Frank Caggiano - One other thing I just thought of. Try to import using iPhoto (if you have it) or with Image Capture to try and narrow down the problem to Aperture or the Raw CAmera bundle

  • Nikon D300 and D70 RAW support broken

    I am an Aperture 1.5 user that recently upgraded to 2.x due to my purchase of a D300. I was shooting a D70 before.
    I am just sort of getting my Aperture library back in shape (sold my G5 and moved completely to MBP until there is a Sub 2k machine that takes two external monitors and/or apple offers matte displays). I started importing some pictures from my D300 which were made with firmware 1.1. The first thing I noticed is that the autostack on import wasn't working. Moving the time domain slider over does nothing until I reach the far right hand side when it stacks the whole flash card full of files together.
    The other odd thing I noticed right off is that it does not auto-rotate shots done in portrait. After noticing that, I changed the import view to the "spreadsheet" format and all of the metadata was blank. Another side effect was that I imported some photos and had aperture place them on a network drive using the year/month of the pictures as the directory structure. This resulted in all of the shots going into a folder structure of 2000/1/ which is completely incorrect as the shots were taken last month and have a correct date/time stamp in the exif header in the files as well as on the actual files themselves.
    I though, perhaps I need to have the 1.10 firmware upgrade on my D300, so I applied that and shot some test pictures with the same result, autostack broken, autorotate broken, no metadata at import. I checked the picture post-import and the metadata seemed to all be there (F-stop, picture orientation, lens data, etc...). I though this might be a bug with the D300 format or using 12bit RAW+Jpeg Fine so I took a few shots with my trusty D70 in RAW and had the exact same issues.
    I finally gave up and took a series of shots with the D300 in Jpeg Fine. All of the above features worked perfectly this time. I repeated the test with the D70 Jpeg files which also worked perfectly.
    The issue only seems to present itself on import. RAW files that are already in my library seem to be fine.
    There is some horrible bug in the handling of Nikon raw files from at least two camera bodies. I looked around and there are some other threads on the discussion groups here citing inability to import and some other camera makes and models and I wanted to get a thread started about the core of these issues as I was able to cross-check with two bodies. I have access to a D80 and a D90 body as well to test with but didn't bother as the D70 support should be well baked at this point.
    Here are the numbers:
    Hardware: MBP 17" 2.4 "Santa Rosa" 4 gig ram
    OS: 10.5.5
    Aperture: 2.1.2
    RAW Support: 2.3 update
    Flash Media: Sandisk Ultra II and Extreme III 30mb/sec
    Flash Reader: Sandisk "14 in 1" OSX compatible (supposedly)
    D300 Firmware: 1.01 and 1.10 tested
    D300 image format: 12 bit RAW (.NEf) + Jpeg large/fine
    D70 Firmware: 2.0
    D70 image format: RAW (.NEF)
    So when can we expect a fix for this issue and will this require an export and re-import of all of the shots I have already imported?
    This is pretty serious as RAW file handling is the #1 feature of Aperture and Nikon is one of the top two brands of camera. This bug has broken multiple features in the software which should have set off red flags. This also broke support for an extremely old body. This is telling me that Apple has a QA problem in their test rig for Aperture.
    This is serious for me personally as this is a heavy use time of year for me and I'm not feeling good about this software. I'm a 1.0 user that upgraded so I have $400 into aperture at this point and I'm not certain it's worth it.
    Thanks

    mindedc wrote:
    Was your aperture a clean install or an upgrade like mine?
    Yes upgraded from 1.5.6 to 2.0 and now 2.1.2
    If an upgrade, did you move an old aperture library or did you export all of your pictures as projects and re-import them to a clean aperture library as I did?
    Library was upgraded when the Aperture opened it in V2.0 - no did not bother to do what you did.
    Did you purchase your Aperture 2.0 some time ago (when it first came out?) or in the last month as I did?
    When it first came out. If you purchased it last month, it should have most, if not all of the updates.
    Are you on PPC or Intel as I am?
    On Intel - in fact on MBP like you, just 15" instead of 17"
    Are you on a platform with a GPU or integrated graphics like I am (Shouldn't make a difference for this but...)?
    To be clear, MBP has a dedicated GPU and not integrated graphics like MB.
    Do you have the D300/D200 write something into the exif headers using the copyright or image comment as I do?
    No image comment but Copyright, new feature since firmware 1.1, on D300.
    Do you keep your machine meticulously clean or do you have lots of software installed like I do (xcode, office 2008, vmware, macports)?
    I try to keep it clean as much as possible. Meaning that I clean out temp and cache out and try to keep the system up to date. As for apps, yes, yes, Parallels instead, and no, respectively. Have lots of other sw installed.
    Do you have other pro apps like I do (final cut)?
    No final cut.
    Do you have iLife 08 installed like I do?
    Yes. Also iWork.
    Would you be willing to swap a raw image from your D300 with a raw image I have and try to cross-import into each others libraries to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that this is related to unique aperture installations (mine being a "bad" one) or that it is a setting/configuration issue on a per camera basis?
    Actually, this test does not do anything. I don't recall the exact thread but it is here in the Aperture Forum, that stated that if you use a card reader (which is what I do), then there are no issues importing D300 nef files. But if you hook up the camera direct, then the issues you have articulated exists.
    That might explain why some people are troubled by this and others are not.
    Btw, I have D70 as well and have no issue with the nef files from that camera as well.
    It seems to me that there is an issue. But there is also work around if you import via card reader. I realize one should be able to do whichever and not encounter any problems but I do believe it is not a major issue or deal breaker so to speak.
    Cheers

  • No new raw support in 3.4?

    As far as I can tell, the update to 3.4 and to iPhoto 9.4 offer no new support for recent cameras.  I still don't have Aperture support for the SONY RX 100 (I do in Lightroom, but not in any products that depend on Apple's raw support - iPhoto, Aperture, Pixelmator, etc..  I understand the no support for the Nikon D600; the camera just started shipping two days ago, but I can't understand why Apple hasn't upgraded the support for dozens of cameras released over the summer.
    Just a gripe.

    Aperture menu -> Provide Aperture Feedback
    Gripe to them, they can do something about it.

Maybe you are looking for