SAP B1 8.8 client taking long time to connect

Dear all,
We have recently upgraded from SAP B1 2007B to SAP B1 8.8 PL8. SP B1 Client connects very well on server but when trying to connect from client machine it takes more than 10 minutes to connect. We have disabled firewall on server as well as all client machines. We have 3 clients each having OS Windows XP, Windows Vista and Windows 7.
Kindly assist with the same asap.
Thanks and Regards,
Pritesh Shah

1. Try without running custom addons/ validation scripts/ approval procedures/ Formatted Search Queries that are active on this specific document
2. Check the following notes that may give you some ideas on what might cause performance related problems:
{do remember to check your current version and patch level and validate the release,patch mentioned on notes}
Note 548772 - The system performance in SAP Business One is very slow
Note 783183 - Slow performance in SQL or Business One
Note 542032 - performance of work flow
Note 1071165 - Low performance while using FMS in long documents
Note 826789 - Analyse Formatted Searches (Performance)
Note 950111 - Workaround for Formatted Search Performance Issue
Note 1002715 - Performance for Document with Freights Enabled
Note 974574 - Low performance for Items that manages serials
Note 1180342 - Update doc takes long time when rounding method is By Document
Note 1114099 - Long time to open sales documents forms for non-superusers
Good Luck,

Similar Messages

  • Connecting to the database taking long time to connect database server

    Hi
    When I execute procedure i am getting the below message at bottom of the Oracle SQL Developer
    "Connecting to the database"
    it is taking more than 10 min plz guide

    Hi
    have you installed a normal Oracle Client also on your Host? normal Oracle Client
    Did you connect with host:port:sid or with a Oracle Naming Service? through TNS Service
    Can you test tnsping <alias> yes, It is working fine
    Did other user have the same problem? yes
    Did you connect through WAN or LAN connection? LAN (Intranet)
    Can you tell more about you client/database setup?
    Database setup:
    OS: Window 2008 server
    version: 11.1.0
    Client: 11.1.0
    OS: Window 2008 server
    Now I am not able to execute single select query which table contains 6 records and 15 columns it is taking long time I have waited 30 min still no resutls
    only one table is behaving like this remaining is working fine
    Edited by: user9235224 on Oct 6, 2012 7:06 PM

  • Sap bi--query taking long time to exexute

    Hi
    When i try  run the bex query ,its taking long time,please suggest
    Thanks
    sreedhar

    Hi
    When i try  run the bex query ,its taking long time,please suggest
    Thanks
    sreedhar

  • ESS page taking long time to load

    Dear Experts,
    While logging to the sap portal, the ess page is taking long time to load. please advice.

    Dear Dishant,
    Error as follows:
    500 Internal Server Error is returned for HTTP request [http://sapprtlclus:50100/webdynpro/resources/sap.com/pb/PageBuilder]:
      component [dispatcher],
      web module [webdynpro/resources/sap.com/pcui_gp~xssutils],
      application [sap.com/pcui_gp~xssutils],
      DC name [sap.com/pcui_gp~xssutils],
      CSN component[CA-GTF-TS-XSS],
      problem categorization [],
      internal categorization [1657115376].
    [EXCEPTION]
    com.sap.tc.webdynpro.services.exceptions.WDRuntimeException: Exception was thrown in preprocessing phase of application session lVF7nzKWRpXYazTzysiRjA--A*GK0SXT8TnfXfHX91En3w--/pcd:portal_content/com.sap.pct/every_user/com.sap.pct.erp.ess.bp_folder/com.sap.pct.erp.ess.roles/com.sap.pct.erp.ess.employee_self_service/com.sap.pct.erp.ess.employee_self_service/com.sap.pct.erp.ess.areagroup_overview/com.sap.pct.erp.ess.overview/sap.com/pcui_gp~xssutils/XssMenu/base/. The causing exception is nested. RID=579178403e4911e4c0f70000010f2eda
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.ApplicationSession.doPreprocessing(ApplicationSession.java:663)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.ApplicationSession.doProcessing(ApplicationSession.java:349)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.RequestManager.doProcessing(RequestManager.java:326)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.serverimpl.core.sessionctx.AbstractExecutionContextDispatcher.delegateToRequestManager(AbstractExecutionContextDispatcher.java:62) 
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.serverimpl.wdc.sessionctx.DispatchHandlerForRequestManager.service(DispatchHandlerForRequestManager.java:39) 
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.serverimpl.wdc.sessionctx.DispatchHandlerForRequestManager.service(DispatchHandlerForRequestManager.java:46) 
    at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.deploy.impl.module.IRequestDispatcherImpl.dispatch(IRequestDispatcherImpl.java:292) 
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.serverimpl.wdc.sessionctx.ExecutionContextDispatcher.dispatchToAppContext(ExecutionContextDispatcher.java:68) 
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.serverimpl.core.sessionctx.AbstractExecutionContextDispatcher.dispatch(AbstractExecutionContextDispatcher.java:53) 
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.RequestManager.doProcessing(RequestManager.java:245)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.embedding.JavaApplicationProxy$Runner.callRequestManager(JavaApplicationProxy.java:1244)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.embedding.JavaApplicationProxy$Runner.callEmbeddedApplication(JavaApplicationProxy.java:1122) 
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.embedding.JavaApplicationProxy$StartCommand.doExecute(JavaApplicationProxy.java:1575)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.embedding.JavaApplicationProxy$AbstractCommand.execute(JavaApplicationProxy.java:1488)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.embedding.JavaApplicationProxy$Runner.execute(JavaApplicationProxy.java:1028)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.embedding.JavaApplicationProxy.execute(JavaApplicationProxy.java:859)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.embedding.JavaApplicationProxy.start1(JavaApplicationProxy.java:637)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.portal.pb.impl.JavaApplicationProxyAdapter.create(JavaApplicationProxyAdapter.java:166)
    at com.sap.portal.pb.PageBuilder.updateApplications(PageBuilder.java:1691)
    at com.sap.portal.pb.PageBuilder.createPage(PageBuilder.java:411)
    at com.sap.portal.pb.PageBuilder.init(PageBuilder.java:655)
    at com.sap.portal.pb.PageBuilder.wdDoInit(PageBuilder.java:227)
    at com.sap.portal.pb.wdp.InternalPageBuilder.wdDoInit(InternalPageBuilder.java:137)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.generation.DelegatingComponent.doInit(DelegatingComponent.java:161)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.controller.Controller.initController(Controller.java:227)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.components.Component.initController(Component.java:258)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.controller.Controller.init(Controller.java:206)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.cal.ClientApplication.init(ClientApplication.java:590)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.cal.ClientApplication.doPreprocessing(ClientApplication.java:1457)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.ApplicationSession.doPreprocessing(ApplicationSession.java:660)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.ApplicationSession.doProcessing(ApplicationSession.java:349)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.RequestManager.doProcessing(RequestManager.java:326)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.serverimpl.core.AbstractDispatcherServlet.doContent(AbstractDispatcherServlet.java:87)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.serverimpl.wdc.DispatcherServlet.doContent(DispatcherServlet.java:89)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.serverimpl.core.AbstractDispatcherServlet.doPost(AbstractDispatcherServlet.java:62)
    at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:754)
    at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:847)
    at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.Invokable.invoke(Invokable.java:152)
    at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.Invokable.invoke(Invokable.java:38)
    at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.HttpHandlerImpl.runServlet(HttpHandlerImpl.java:466)
    at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.HttpHandlerImpl.handleRequest(HttpHandlerImpl.java:210)
    at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.startServlet(RequestAnalizer.java:441)
    at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.startServlet(RequestAnalizer.java:430)
    at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.filters.DSRWebContainerFilter.process(DSRWebContainerFilter.java:38)
    at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.chain.AbstractChain.process(AbstractChain.java:78)
    at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.filters.ServletSelector.process(ServletSelector.java:81)
    at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.chain.AbstractChain.process(AbstractChain.java:78)
    at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.filters.ApplicationSelector.process(ApplicationSelector.java:278)
    at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.chain.AbstractChain.process(AbstractChain.java:78)
    at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.filters.WebContainerInvoker.process(WebContainerInvoker.java:81)
    at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.chain.HostFilter.process(HostFilter.java:9)
    at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.chain.AbstractChain.process(AbstractChain.java:78)
    at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.filters.ResponseLogWriter.process(ResponseLogWriter.java:60)
    at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.chain.HostFilter.process(HostFilter.java:9)
    at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.chain.AbstractChain.process(AbstractChain.java:78)
    at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.filters.DefineHostFilter.process(DefineHostFilter.java:27)
    at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.chain.ServerFilter.process(ServerFilter.java:12)
    at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.chain.AbstractChain.process(AbstractChain.java:78)
    at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.filters.MonitoringFilter.process(MonitoringFilter.java:29)
    at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.chain.ServerFilter.process(ServerFilter.java:12)
    at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.chain.AbstractChain.process(AbstractChain.java:78)
    at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.filters.SessionSizeFilter.process(SessionSizeFilter.java:26)
    at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.chain.ServerFilter.process(ServerFilter.java:12)
    at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.chain.AbstractChain.process(AbstractChain.java:78)
    at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.filters.MemoryStatisticFilter.process(MemoryStatisticFilter.java:57)
    at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.chain.ServerFilter.process(ServerFilter.java:12)
    at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.chain.AbstractChain.process(AbstractChain.java:78)
    at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.filters.DSRHttpFilter.process(DSRHttpFilter.java:43)
    at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.chain.ServerFilter.process(ServerFilter.java:12)
    at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.chain.AbstractChain.process(AbstractChain.java:78)
    at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Processor.chainedRequest(Processor.java:475)
    at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Processor$FCAProcessorThread.process(Processor.java:269)
    at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.rcm.RequestProcessorThread.run(RequestProcessorThread.java:56)
    at com.sap.engine.core.thread.execution.Executable.run(Executable.java:122)
    at com.sap.engine.core.thread.execution.Executable.run(Executable.java:101)
    at com.sap.engine.core.thread.execution.CentralExecutor$SingleThread.run(CentralExecutor.java:328)
    Caused by: com.sap.tc.webdynpro.services.exceptions.ApplicationFaultException: wdDoInit: exception thrown in this user coding area
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.generation.DelegatingComponent.doInit(DelegatingComponent.java:164)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.controller.Controller.initController(Controller.java:227)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.components.Component.initController(Component.java:258)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.controller.Controller.init(Controller.java:206)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.cal.ClientApplication.init(ClientApplication.java:590)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.cal.ClientApplication.doPreprocessing(ClientApplication.java:1457)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.ApplicationSession.doPreprocessing(ApplicationSession.java:660)
    ... 75 more
    Caused by: com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.context.DictionaryException: failed to create provider: com.sap.mw.jco.JCO$Exception: (101) RFC_ERROR_PROGRAM: Parameter containing a user ID is missing: neither user nor user alias nor external ID nor SSO ticket nor X.509 certificate is specified{jco.client.lang=EN, jco.client.client=300, jco.client.passwd=<null>, jco.client.mshost=sapprdcluster, jco.client.group=SAPPRDCLUS, jco.client.r3name=PRD}
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.context.DictionaryHandler.getScalarType(DictionaryHandler.java:378)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.context.DictionaryHandler.getDataType(DictionaryHandler.java:126)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.context.DataAttributeInfo.init(DataAttributeInfo.java:438)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.context.NodeInfo.initUnmappedAttributes(NodeInfo.java:1002)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.context.DataNodeInfo.doInit(DataNodeInfo.java:294)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.context.NodeInfo.init(NodeInfo.java:974)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.context.NodeInfo.init(NodeInfo.java:978)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.context.Context.init(Context.java:67)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.controller.Controller.init(Controller.java:205)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.components.Component.getCustomControllerInternal(Component.java:668)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.components.Component.getController(Component.java:597)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.components.Component.getController(Component.java:552)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.generation.DelegatingComponent.getPublicInterface(DelegatingComponent.java:275)
    at com.sap.pcuigp.xssfpm.wd.wdp.InternalFPMComponent.wdGetBackendConnectionsController(InternalFPMComponent.java:190)
    at com.sap.pcuigp.xssfpm.wd.FPMComponent.wdDoInit(FPMComponent.java:204)
    at com.sap.pcuigp.xssfpm.wd.wdp.InternalFPMComponent.wdDoInit(InternalFPMComponent.java:105)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.generation.DelegatingComponent.doInit(DelegatingComponent.java:161)
    ... 81 more
    Caused by: com.sap.dictionary.runtime.DdException: failed to create provider: com.sap.mw.jco.JCO$Exception: (101) RFC_ERROR_PROGRAM: Parameter containing a user ID is missing: neither user nor user alias nor external ID nor SSO ticket nor X.509 certificate is specified{jco.client.lang=EN, jco.client.client=300, jco.client.passwd=<null>, jco.client.mshost=sapprdcluster, jco.client.group=SAPPRDCLUS, jco.client.r3name=PRD}
    at com.sap.dictionary.runtime.ProviderFactory.internalGetProvider(ProviderFactory.java:291)
    at com.sap.dictionary.runtime.ProviderFactory.getProvider(ProviderFactory.java:161)
    at com.sap.dictionary.runtime.DdDictionaryPool.getProvider(DdDictionaryPool.java:98)
    at com.sap.dictionary.runtime.DdDictionaryPool.makeDictionary(DdDictionaryPool.java:77)
    at com.sap.dictionary.runtime.DdDictionaryPool.makeDictionary(DdDictionaryPool.java:65)
    at com.sap.dictionary.runtime.DdBroker.getDataType(DdBroker.java:230)
    at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.context.DictionaryHandler.getScalarType(DictionaryHandler.java:370)
    ... 97 more
    Caused by: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
    at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:39)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:27)
    at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:513)
    at com.sap.dictionary.runtime.ProviderFactory.internalGetProvider(ProviderFactory.java:271)
    ... 103 more
    Caused by: com.sap.mw.jco.JCO$Exception: (101) RFC_ERROR_PROGRAM: Parameter containing a user ID is missing: neither user nor user alias nor external ID nor SSO ticket nor X.509 certificate is specified
    at com.sap.mdi.jco6.Factory.makeException(Factory.java:33)
    at com.sap.mdi.jco6.Destination.connect(Destination.java:57)
    at com.sap.dictionary.runtime.mdi.DataProvider.<init>(DataProvider.java:97)
    at com.sap.dictionary.runtime.mdi.DataProvider.<init>(DataProvider.java:115)
    ... 108 more
    Caused by: com.sap.mw.jco.JCO$Exception: (101) RFC_ERROR_PROGRAM: Parameter containing a user ID is missing: neither user nor user alias nor external ID nor SSO ticket nor X.509 certificate is specified
    at com.sap.mw.jco.MiddlewareJRfc.generateJCoException(MiddlewareJRfc.java:559)
    at com.sap.mw.jco.MiddlewareJRfc$Client.initialize(MiddlewareJRfc.java:1071)
    at com.sap.mw.jco.JCO$Client.connect(JCO.java:3654)
    at com.sap.mdi.jco6.Destination.connect(Destination.java:54)
    ... 110 more
    Caused by: RfcException: [null]
        message: Parameter containing a user ID is missing: neither user nor user alias nor external ID nor SSO ticket nor X.509 certificate is specified
        Return code: RFC_INVALID_PARAMETER(19)
        error group: 101
        key: RFC_ERROR_PROGRAM
    at com.sap.mw.rfc.api.RfcOptions.checkLogonData(RfcOptions.java:162)
    at com.sap.mw.rfc.api.RfcOptions.checkParameters(RfcOptions.java:345)
    at com.sap.mw.jco.MiddlewareJRfc$Client.initialize(MiddlewareJRfc.java:1066)
    ... 112 more

  • VA05 & VA05N - Taking Long time to Give the Output.

    Dear All,
    VA05 & VA05N - Taking Long time to Give the Output for
                              Single date & Single Sales Office
    if I create Z-Program (VBAK) also taking Long time for Single date & Single Sales Office.
    Please Give some idea to Optimization the VA05 & VA05N.
    Please Give your Valuable solution.
    Thanks,
    Durai.V

    Dear Lakshmipathi,
       In my Previous client (ECC 5.0) VA05N Executing very fast for one month date for all sales office.
    They running SAP around 3 years, there data also huge but its giving fast output.
      But my current client ECC 5.0, here running SAP around 2.5 years, But here taking Long time to give
    the output for singe date & one Sales Office.
      But Billing details report VF05N Executing very fast.
    Thanks,
    Durai.V

  • The ODS activation is taking long time

    Hi,
    We are on SAP NetWeaver BI 701 (Support Package 5).
    We create a Z ODS, it will contain a lot of data (180.000.000 month-end) and we want to generate specific reports about it.
    The activation is taking long time, I assume is because we checked the flag "SIDs Generation upon Activation". I am confused about this check. I really need it? is this check the only problem.
    Thanks for you help.
    Victoria

    Hi Victoria:
       If your Z DSO is used only for staging purposes (you don't have queries based on this DSO and you send the data to another DSO or to an InfoCube) then you don't need to check the "SIDs Generation Upon Activation" box.
    Even more, to achieve better performance during data loads in this scenario, you might consider using a Write Optimized DSO instead of a Standard DSO, but if you decide to take this alternative don't forget to select the "Do Not check Uniqueness of Data" box if you need to write several records with the same Semantic Key.
    Regards,
    Francisco Milán.

  • Taking Long Time To Show Printer Selection Window

    Hi experts,
    When users are taking printout through SAP,it's taking long time to show printer selection window(Local Printer Selection Windows)
    present i am using sap ehp7 on sybase in windows.
    Thanks in advance..

    Hi,
    Have you tried by reinstalling of printer with patch updation of printer as well as of windows also ? If possible try to uninstall the printer & check again by reselection.
    Addition to it could you please share SAP GUI version on the system & confirm for, are you getting this issue on every system ( OS ) ?
    Regards,
    Gaurav

  • Installation of ECC6 on AIX/ DB2 taking long time

    Hi,
    I am installing SAP ECC 6 on a heavy power server with AIX 5.3 with DB2 9 and amd all the other setting is perfect with correct JDK version. The first 24 step on installation went fine in 20 min and its been more than 16 hrs where installation is on ABAP import step. The installation is running fine with out any error but its takeing long time
    does it take long time on AIX with DB2?
    Cheers
    Arun

    Hi,
    The space fine here. installation directory is 94% free. and Log also same. Let me know wht is the minimum to maximum time for the installation
    Cheers
    Arun

  • Full GC taking longer time

    hi Team,
    We are running SLD on separate hardware with Windows 2003. But since couple of months we been observing that 'full GC taking longer time' then it used to be. So wondering what are the possible parameters, configuration items that i need to look back to find tune this issue.
    any good reference docs related to find tuning the GC is much appriciated.
    Thanks
    Sekhar

    Hi ,
    Hope this might help.
    http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/i-gctroub/
    http://my.safaribooksonline.com/0596003773/javapt2-CHP-3-SECT-4#X2ludGVybmFsX1NlY3Rpb25Db250ZW50P3htbGlkPTA1OTYwMDM3NzMvamF2YXB0Mi1DSFAtMy1TRUNULTE=
    http://java.sun.com/docs/hotspot/gc5.0/gc_tuning_5.html
    Also check out the pdfs
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/7fdca26e-0601-0010-369d-b3fc87d3a2d9
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/22baa590-0201-0010-26a3-f1cfa2469973
    Rgds
    joel

  • SSRS Reports taking long time to load

    Hello,
    Problem : SSRS Reports taking long time to load
    My System environment : Visual Studio 2008 SP1  and SQL Server 2008 R2
    Production Environment : Visual Studio 2008 SP1  and SQL Server 2008 R2
    I have created a Parameterized report (6 parameters), it will fetch data from 1 table. table has 1 year and 6 months data,      I am selecting parameters for only 1 month (about 2500 records). It is taking almost 2 minutes and 30 seconds
    to load the report.
    This report running efficiently in my system (report load takes only 5 to 6 seconds) but in
    production it is taking 2 minutes 30 seconds.
    I have checked the Execution log from production so I found the timing for
    Data retrieval (approx~)       Processing (approx~)               Rendering (approx~)
    10 second                                      15 sec                        
                2 mins and 5 sec.
    But Confusing point is that , if I run the same report at different time overall output time is same (approx) 2 min 30 sec but
    Data retrieval (approx~)       Processing (approx~)                Rendering (approx~)
    more than 1 min                            15 sec                                     
    more than 1 min
    so 1 question why timings are different ?
    My doubts are
    1) If query(procedure to retrieve the data) is the problem then it should take more time always,
    2) If Report structure is problem then rendering will also take same time (long time)
    for this (2nd point) I checked on blog that Rendering depends on environment structure e.g. Network bandwidth, RAM, CPU Usage , Number of users accessing same report at a time.
    So I did testing of report when no other user working on any report But failed (same result  output is 2 min 30 sec)
    From network team I got the result is that there is no issue or overload in CPU usage or RAM also No issue in Network bandwidth.
    Production Database Server and Report server are different (but in same network).
    I checked that database server the SQL Server is using almost Full RAM (23 GB out of 24 GB)
    I tried to allocate the memory to less amount up to 2GB (Trial solution I got from Blogs) but this on also failed.
    one hint I got from colleague that , change the allocated memory setting from static memory to dynamic to SQL Server
    (I guess above point is the same) I could not find that option Static and Dynamic memory setting.
    I did below steps
    Connected to SQL Server Instance
    Right click on Instance go to properties, Go to Memory Tab
    I found three options 1) Server Memory   2) Other memory   3) Section for "Configured values and Running values"
    Then I tried to reduce Maximum  Server memory up to 2 GB (As mentioned above)
    All trials failed, this issue I could not find the roots for this issue.
    Can anyone please help (it's bit urgent).

    Hi UdayKGR,
    According to your description, your report takes too long to load on your production environment. Right?
    In this scenario, since the report runs quickly in developing environment, we initially think it supposed to be the issue on data retrieval. However, based on the information in execution log, it takes longest time on rendering part. So we suggest you optimize
    the report itself to reduce the time for rendering. Please refer to the link below:
    My report takes too long to render
    Here is another article about overall performance optimization for Reporting Services:
    Reporting Services Performance and Optimization
    If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
    Best Regards,
    Simon Hou

  • F4 Help is taking long time

    Hi All,
    We are working on BI 7.0. version
    In the varaible pop-up screen we have two info objects.
    1. Fiscal year Period
    2. JOA(Joint operating aggriment)
    If u press F4 for JOA, it is taking long time to execute and finally the application is getting closed.same situation is there in RSRT also.
    If i enter with out JOA the query is giving the output. Here i have to restrict the query by JOA.
    i have changed the JOA peroperties in query designer.
    Query execution for filter value selection = Values in master data table.......
    but still the situation is the same.......
    Could you please suggest any solution for this.....
    Thanks & Regards,
    PK

    Hi Kamal,
    You can set that at the query level in the query designer for each query.
    1. Select the corresponding characteristic in the query designer.
    2. Goto to the "Extended tab" in the properties
    3. Select the "Values in the Master data table" in the "Query execution in the filter value selection.
    Also see some recomendations:
    Note 748623 - Input help (F4) has a very long runtime - recommendations
    Hope this helps.
    CK

  • Update ztable is taking long time

    Hi All,
    i have run the 5 jobs with the same program at a time but when we check the db trace
    zs01 is taking long time as shown below.here zs01 is having small amount of data.
    in the below dbtrace for updating zs01 is taking 2,315,485 seconds .how to reduce this?
    HH:MM:SS.MS Duration     Program   ObjectName  Op.   Curs   Array   Rec     RC     Conn     
    2:36:15 AM     2,315,485     SAPLZS01  ZS01       FETCH  294     1     1     0     R/3     
    The code as shown below
    you can check the code in the program SAPLZS01 include LZS01F01.
    FORM UPDATE_ZS01.
    IF ZS02-STATUS = '3'.
        IF Z_ZS02_STATUS = '3'.            "previous status is ERROR
          EXIT.
        ELSE.
          SELECT SINGLE FOR UPDATE * FROM  ZS01
                 WHERE  PROC_NUM    = ZS02-PROC_NUM.
          CHECK SY-SUBRC = 0.
          ADD ZS02-MF_AMT TO ZS01-ERR_AMT.
          ADD 1           TO ZS01-ERR_INVOI.
          UPDATE ZS01.
        ENDIF.
      ENDIF.
    my question is when updating the ztable why it is taking such long time,
    how to reduce the time or how to make faster to update the ztable .
    Thanks in advance,
    regards
    Suni

    Try the code like this..
    data: wa_zs01 type zs01.
    FORM UPDATE_ZS01.
    IF ZS02-STATUS = '3'.
        IF Z_ZS02_STATUS = '3'.            "previous status is ERROR
          EXIT.
        ELSE.
          SELECT SINGLE FOR UPDATE * FROM  ZS01
                 WHERE  PROC_NUM    = ZS02-PROC_NUM.
    -- change
      CHECK SY-SUBRC = 0.
          ADD ZS02-MF_AMT TO wa_ZS01-ERR_AMT.
          ADD 1           TO wa_ZS01-ERR_INVOI.
          UPDATE ZS01 from wa_zs01.
        ENDIF.
      ENDIF.
    And i think this Select query for ZS01 is inside the ZS02 SELECT statement,
    This might also make slow process.
    If you want to make database access always use Workarea/Internal table to fetch the data
    and work with that.
    Accessing database like this or with Select.... endselect is an inefficient programming.

  • Simple query is taking long time

    Hi Experts,
    The below query is taking long time.
    [code]SELECT   FS.*
      FROM   ORL.FAX_STAGE FS
             INNER JOIN
                   ORL.FAX_SOURCE FSRC
                INNER JOIN
                   GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING GBM
                ON GBM.BU_ID = FSRC.BUID
             ON UPPER (FSRC.FAX_NUMBER) = UPPER (FS.DESTINATION)
    WHERE       FSRC.IS_DELETED = 'N'
             AND GBM.BU_ID IS NOT NULL
             AND UPPER (FS.FAX_STATUS) ='COMPLETED';[/code]
    this query is returning 1645457 records.
    [code]PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    | Id  | Operation           | Name                   | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)|
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT    |                        |   625K|   341M| 45113   (1)|
    |   1 |  HASH JOIN          |                        |   625K|   341M| 45113   (1)|
    |   2 |   NESTED LOOPS      |                        |   611 | 14664 |    22   (0)|
    |   3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL| FAX_SOURCE             |  2290 | 48090 |    22   (0)|
    |   4 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN | GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING_BUID |     1 |     3 |     0   (0)|
    |   5 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL | FAX_STAGE              |  2324K|  1214M| 45076   (1)|
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Note
       - 'PLAN_TABLE' is old version
    15 rows selected.[/code]
    The distinct number of records in each table.
    [code]SELECT FAX_STATUS,count(*)
    FROM fax_STAGE
    GROUP BY FAX_STATUS;
    FAX_STATUS    COUNT(*)
    BROKEN          10
    Broken - New    9
    Completed    2324493
    New             20
    SELECT is_deleted,COUNT(*)
    FROM  FAX_SOURCE
    GROUP BY IS_DELETED;
    IS_DELETED COUNT(*)
    N         2290
    Y         78[/code]
    Total number of records in each table.
    [code]SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ORL.FAX_SOURCE FSRC-- 2368
    SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ORL.FAX_STAGE--2324532
    SELECT COUNT(*) FROM APPS_GLOBAL.GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING--9
    [/code]
    To improve the performance of this query I have created the following indexes.
    [code]Functional based index on UPPER (FSRC.FAX_NUMBER) ,UPPER (FS.DESTINATION) and UPPER (FS.FAX_STATUS).
    Bitmap index on FSRC.IS_DELETED.
    Normal Index on GBM.BU_ID and FSRC.BUID.
    [/code]
    But still the performance is bad for this query.
    What can I do apart from this to improve the performance of this query.
    Please help me .
    Thanks in advance.

    <I have created the following indexes.
    CREATE INDEX ORL.IDX_DESTINATION_RAM ON ORL.FAX_STAGE(UPPER("DESTINATION"))
    CREATE INDEX ORL.IDX_FAX_STATUS_RAM ON ORL.FAX_STAGE(LOWER("FAX_STATUS"))
    CREATE INDEX ORL.IDX_UPPER_FAX_STATUS_RAM ON ORL.FAX_STAGE(UPPER("FAX_STATUS"))
    CREATE INDEX ORL.IDX_BUID_RAM ON ORL.FAX_SOURCE(BUID)
    CREATE INDEX ORL.IDX_FAX_NUMBER_RAM ON ORL.FAX_SOURCE(UPPER("FAX_NUMBER"))
    CREATE BITMAP INDEX ORL.IDX_IS_DELETED_RAM ON ORL.FAX_SOURCE(IS_DELETED)
    After creating the following indexes performance got improved.
    But our DBA said that new BITMAP index at FAX_SOURCE table (ORL.IDX_IS_DELETED_RAM) can cause locks
    on multiple rows if IS_DELETED column is in use. Please proceed with detailed tests.
    I am sending the explain plan before creating indexes and after indexes has been created.
    SELECT  FS.*
    FROM  ORL.FAX_STAGE FS
                    INNER JOIN
                    ORL.FAX_SOURCE FSRC
                  INNER JOIN
                      GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING GBM
                    ON GBM.BU_ID = FSRC.BUID
                ON UPPER (FSRC.FAX_NUMBER) = UPPER (FS.DESTINATION)
    WHERE      FSRC.IS_DELETED = 'N'
              AND GBM.BU_ID IS NOT NULL
              AND UPPER (FS.FAX_STATUS) =:B1;
    --OLD without indexes
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 3076973749
    | Id  | Operation          | Name                  | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time    |
    |  0 | SELECT STATEMENT    |                        |  141K|    85M| 45130  (1)| 00:09:02 |
    |*  1 |  HASH JOIN          |                        |  141K|    85M| 45130  (1)| 00:09:02 |
    |  2 |  NESTED LOOPS      |                        |  611 | 18330 |    22  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL| FAX_SOURCE            |  2290 | 59540 |    22  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  4 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN | GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING_BUID |    1 |    4 |    0  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  5 |  TABLE ACCESS FULL | FAX_STAGE              | 23245 |    13M| 45106  (1)| 00:09:02 |
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
      1 - access(UPPER("FSRC"."FAX_NUMBER")=UPPER("FS"."DESTINATION"))
      3 - filter("FSRC"."IS_DELETED"='N')
      4 - access("GBM"."BU_ID"="FSRC"."BUID")
          filter("GBM"."BU_ID" IS NOT NULL)
      5 - filter(UPPER("FS"."FAX_STATUS")=SYS_OP_C2C(:B1))
    21 rows selected.
    --NEW with indexes.
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 665032407
    | Id  | Operation                        | Name                    | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time    |
    |  0 | SELECT STATEMENT                |                          |  5995 |  3986K|  3117  (1)| 00:00:38 |
    |*  1 |  HASH JOIN                      |                          |  5995 |  3986K|  3117  (1)| 00:00:38 |
    |  2 |  NESTED LOOPS                  |                          |  611 | 47658 |    20  (5)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  3 |    VIEW                          | index$_join$_002        |  2290 |  165K|    20  (5)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  4 |    HASH JOIN                    |                          |      |      |            |      |
    |*  5 |      HASH JOIN                  |                          |      |      |            |      |
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    |  6 |      BITMAP CONVERSION TO ROWIDS|                          |  2290 |  165K|    1  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  7 |        BITMAP INDEX SINGLE VALUE | IDX_IS_DELETED_RAM      |      |      |            |      |
    |  8 |      INDEX FAST FULL SCAN      | IDX_BUID_RAM            |  2290 |  165K|    8  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  9 |      INDEX FAST FULL SCAN        | IDX_FAX_NUMBER_RAM      |  2290 |  165K|    14  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 10 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN              | GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING_BUID  |    1 |    4 |    0  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  11 |  TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID    | FAX_STAGE                | 23245 |    13M|  3096  (1)| 00:00:38 |
    |* 12 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN              | IDX_UPPER_FAX_STATUS_RAM |  9298 |      |  2434  (1)| 00:00:30 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
      1 - access(UPPER("DESTINATION")="FSRC"."SYS_NC00035$")
      3 - filter("FSRC"."IS_DELETED"='N')
      4 - access(ROWID=ROWID)
      5 - access(ROWID=ROWID)
      7 - access("FSRC"."IS_DELETED"='N')
      10 - access("GBM"."BU_ID"="FSRC"."BUID")
          filter("GBM"."BU_ID" IS NOT NULL)
      12 - access(UPPER("FAX_STATUS")=SYS_OP_C2C(:B1))
    31 rows selected
    Please confirm on the DBA comment.Is this bitmap index locks rows in my case.
    Thanks.>

  • Fwrite() and fread() of a shared FAT32 formatted file is taking long time in MAC osx Lion C program

    Hi
    Is there any provision or api in MAC to open a file in shared mode same as windows
       hUSBdrive = CreateFile(pDriveName, GENERIC_READ | GENERIC_WRITE, FILE_SHARE_READ | FILE_SHARE_WRITE, NULL, OPEN_EXISTING, FILE_FLAG_NO_BUFFERING, NULL);
    we have the follwing scenario where a file is shared among two processes for read/write.one is running on Linux and the other one is running on MAC.where both the processses are reading/writing into the same memory location in the file say "X"
    FAT 32 formatted raw data file which is located on the device, is shared among two processes.
    One process is running on Linux device which is connected to MAC book through usb.In this linux process, the file is opened using fopen() and we have used fcntl() with O_DIRECT flag.This process continuously reads/writes data on memory location "X" in the shared file .
    The other process is running on Mac which has simple c program that opens the file on the connected device i.e from usb drive and reads/writes data using fread()/fwrite().fopen() is used to open the file and FILE_NOCACHE flag is used to avoid caching.
    The value at memory location "X" is updated by mac by using fwrite() and the linux process reads the memory location "X" by using fread(). Linux process is taking around 30 sec to get the updated value.
    If the value is updated by Linux process at memory location "X" by using fwrite() the MAC process is also taking long time more than a minute to read the updated value by usng fread().
    fwrite()/fread() on mac is taking long time where as the windows application which uses the same apis is taking msec time.
    Do we need to use other api s or flags to open file?
    thanks in advance.......

    does any one face this kind of problem?
    fwrite() and fread() takes long time?
    Is there any problem in read/write to a fat32 file on MAC?

  • RSPCM is taking long time

    Hi,
    RSPCM is taking long time to open at the same time RSPC is working fine
    when I try to change the process chain status through RSPC_PROCESS_FINISH . it is executing for long time no response. I tried executing it backgrond also from past 2 days it is running, no progress.
    Our basis team created index to all backend table of RSPCM, still issue persist. Please suggest me some to get rid of this.
    Br,
    Harish

    hi,
    Please check the below thread
    RSPCM T-Code was executing very slow
    Please check note 1372931
    hope it helps!
    Edited by: Lavanya J on Nov 4, 2011 1:32 PM

Maybe you are looking for