SAP BI 7.3 Analysis authorization transport log

Hi,
   We have transported a Analysis authorization to production system, I would like to know the exact changes moved through this transport carrying a particular analysis authorization.
The issue here is RSECVAL_CL has not recorded the changes done on this particular Analysis authorization in development system.
So please suggest if there is any table where we can look to find the exact changes made by this transport request.
Regards,
Ananth
Edited by: Anantharama Shivashankar on Oct 26, 2011 6:48 PM

The issue here is RSECVAL_CL has not recorded the changes done on this particular Analysis authorization in development system
I guess that is a problem and should be reported to SAP. However this table will give the value that has been deleted. New value to be checked in analysis authorization itself.
EDITED : If the AA been transported before then might look their content and compare them.
Regards,
Arpan Paik
Edited by: P Arpan on Oct 31, 2011 3:44 PM

Similar Messages

  • Role and Analysis Authorization Transport

    Dear Experts,
    I'm working with migration authorization project from 3.5 to 7.0. My doubt is when migrate in development enviroment enhancement each whith join S_RS_AUTH with Analysis Authorization which the role doesn't have any users assigning and transport to test enviroment where have a same role with user assigning. Do lose the user assign?
    Thank for all,
    Luis

    Hi,
    I think it will orverwrite the Role. If you want to lock the target system against import of user assignments, you can goto sm30 (Table - PRGN_CUST). Make an entry - USER_REL_IMPORT (value - NO).
    Thanks

  • Dynamic Analysis authorization to handle changing row level security in BW

    Hi experts,
        Is it possible to implement SAP BW 7.x ANALYSIS AUTHORIZATION in a dynamic manner. One example of this will be to replicate the CRM Organization model in SAP BW and display data as per organization Model.
       One example would be a Manager or a Org unit able to display all Sales Orders where all employee belonging to that Org unit are maintained in those Sales Order as employee responsible. If this Org structure is static it can be easily done in BW BY Analysis authorization. But not sure about the approach when the Org structure changes in a regular interval in CRM,
    Thanks for help

    If you maintain the "Org structure" as a BW hierarchy, and if it always changes in CRM,
    then you just need to load the hierarchy again to BW after the change in CRM.
    In the analysis authorization, e.g. if you assign a user to be authorized for all nodes and leaves under a certain node A,
    then it would still work even if what's below node A changes.
    Hope this answers your question.
    Regards,
    Patricia

  • [BO over SAP BW] Web Intelligence Report + BI 7.0 Analysis Authorizations

    Hello Experts,
    I have created a report on a universe based in a SAP BW InfoCube that contains an authorization relevant InfoObject (Company Code).
    BW Analysis authorization have been set up for this cube in such way that the user should have access only to data containing one of the two values of Company Code (lets say for example that the user can access value "A").
    It seems to be working fine when testing them via a BEx Query or via rsecadmin (rsrt with detailed analysis authorization logs). When the test user tries to view the full contents of the specific cube gets an "access denied" message (this is normal), whereas if the user runs a report with a filter "A" on Company Code the report returns the results as it should have. So far so good.
    For testing use within Web Intelligence, I have created the following Single Sign On (SSO) universes: a)directly on the cube, b)via a "select all" query and finally c)via a filtered query (filtering the exact allowed values of analysis authorization of the test user). All of the above have unfortunately the exact same issues:
    When a test user with limited analysis authorization (i.e. a user that can only access value "A" of Company Code) tries to view a report on either of these universes, then the result is the following message when trying to execute the query "A database error occured. The database error text is: Error loading cube MyCube/MyQuery (catalog MyCube): Unknown error. (WIS 10901)"
    I have tried several settings on the universe (like filter working on LoV as well) but none helped.
    If we replace the user's analysis authorizations with full access on company code (values "A" and "B") the query runs as it should have.
    Any ideas?
    Best regards
    Giorgos

    Hi,
    has the Universe been created on the cube level or on the query level ?
    In case it is on the cube level it will fail because :
    Analysis authorizations are not based on authorization objects. Instead, you create authorizations that include a group of characteristics. You restrict the values for these characteristics.
    The authorizations can include any authorization-relevant characteristics, and treat single values, intervals, and hierarchy authorizations in the same way. Navigation attributes can also be flagged as authorization-relevant in the attribute maintenance for characteristics and can be added to authorizations as separate characteristics.
    You can then assign this authorization to one or more users.
    All characteristics flagged as authorization-relevant are checked when a query is executed.
    *A query always selects a set of data from the database. If authorization-relevant characteristics are part of this data, you have to make sure that the user who is executing the query has sufficient authorization for the complete selection. Otherwise, an error message is displayed indicating that the authorization is not sufficient. In principle, the authorizations do not work as filters. Very restricted exceptions to this rule are hierarchies in the drilldown and variables that are filled depending on authorizations. Hierarchies are mostly restricted to the authorized nodes, and variables that are filled depending on authorizations act like filters for the authorized values for the particular characteristic*
    Ingo

  • Hierarchy Analysis Authorization does not work after transport

    Hi Gurus,
    I am facing a issue in hierarchy analysis authorization in quality system but the same authorization works perfectly fine in development.
    All hierarchy authorizations works in Quality except for this one. I found one old sap note describing this as program error but this note is not applicable in BW 7.3.
    I have checked the table RSECVAL, RSECHIER and authorization is active so everything looks good. Please advise if anyone faced this issue after transporting hierarchy auths to other systems
    Regards,
    Salman

    Salman,
    What I understood from your description is that you have same role+AA in Dev and QA, which provides access in Dev for all the nodes for said hierarchy but in QA, same role+AA provides access to the same hierarchy for all the nodes but one. Try to create a ZTEST analysis authorization in QA itself with access for the problematic hierarchy node and see if it works ? This will rule out the case if there is a difference in hierarchy in DEV & QA.
    Regards,
    Shivraj Singh

  • Transport roles and analysis authorization with user assigned

    Hi expert,
    I face with this problem transport roles and analysis authorization with user assigned. When I have created a transport request to move the roles and analysis authorization from development system to test system. I couldnu2019t maintain the user assigned, after transport I have to assigned manually all of user or create a program to fill AGR_USER table or there are other way.
    Thanks for your time,
    Luis

    Hi,
    In role administration, you have the following options for transporting roles:
    You can download the roles from one system and upload them into another  
    You can import the role from a remote system using RFC  
    You can transport the roles with the transport function.
    Role upload loads all role data, including authorization data from a file into the SAP system. The user assignments for the role and the generated profiles for the role are exceptions in this case.
    Transporting Roles with the Role Transport Function
           1.      Start the role administration function by choosing Tools ® Administration ® User Maintenance ® Role Administration ® Roles (transaction PFCG).
           2.      Enter the role to be transported and choose Transport Role.
    The Mass Transport of Roles screen appears. You can control the default settings for the options Also transport single roles for composite roles and Also transport generated profiles for roles using Customizing switches (see Role Administration Functions in the section Functions of the Utilities Menu).
    You should not change the authorizations profiles of the role after you have included the role in a transport request. If you need to change the profiles or generate them for the first time, transport the entire role again afterwards.
    For more information go thrpugh the below link
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/6d/7c8cfd410ea040aadf92e1f78107a4/content.htm
    Regards,
    Marasa.

  • Transport Request for Analysis Authorization

    Hello Everyone,
    When a trasport request is created for any BI analysis authorization ( including the Z*), the type of trasport request created
    is workbench request. What is the reason behind this because when any Customised Role / Profile is included in transport request this will be customised request unlike analysis authorization.
    Thanks in advance.....

    Hi Rashmi,
    The difference is In BI, the AA authorizations are independent. Any objects that are independent of the client will be captured in the workbench type of transport request, when they are required in the other client. Hence you can see the Workbech type request for  transporting changed Repository objects and changed system settings from cross-client tables. However, customizing requests involve changes recorded to client-specific Customizing objects .
    The Analysis authorizations are always captured in a Workbench type of transport request by default due to the above design.
    You can still transport both the PFCG role, and AA in a single transport request, you can do the same by following the steps mentioned in the below Wiki:
    https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/BI/HowtotranportroleandAAtogetherinBI
    Regards,
    Raghu

  • How to View Transport Log in DEV SAP Portal System

    Hi All,
    Kindly help me by giving me the path of where is the Import, Export and Transport Log maintained in SAP Portal.
    And is it posible to view the Log of other systems from DEV system? If yes then how.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards,
    Disha.

    Hi,
    Please navigate to usr/sap/trans/CMS/log to view logs.
    Alternatively in the CMS, you can click on "Go to History" which will display all previous transports. You can see the details from there.
    Thanks

  • BI7 : Transport deletion of analysis authorizations

    Hi,
    I was just wondering if it is possible to transport the deletion of analysis authorizations exactly as we do for roles.
    Do we have to first create a transport request with the analysis authorization before deleting them and then transport the request or do we have to delete them manually on each system?
    I checked in the documentation but I didn't find anything similar.
    Thank you in advance for your help.
    Regards,
    Vince

    Hi Gowrinadh,
    Thank you for your answer. I already worked on the analysis authorization concept and I have seen this blog while I was searching for an answer regarding deletion but unfortunately there is no explanation about it.
    I was just wondering if it is exactly like in PFCG because there is no pop-up message in RSECADMIN explaining that it must be added first to a transport request.
    According to Zaheer it works exactly the same so I will test.
    Thx for your help .
    Edited by: Vince Bl. on Mar 18, 2009 6:04 PM

  • Web Intelligence Report + BI 7.0 Analysis Authorizations

    Hello Experts,
    I have created a report on a universe based in a SAP BW InfoCube that contains an authorization relevant InfoObject (Company Code).
    BW Analysis authorization have been set up for this cube in such way that the user should have access only to data containing one of the two values of Company Code (lets say for example that the user can access value "A").
    It seems to be working fine when testing them via a BEx Query or via rsecadmin (rsrt with detailed analysis authorization logs). When the test user tries to view the full contents of the specific cube gets an "access denied" message (this is normal), whereas if the user runs a report with a filter "A" on Company Code the report returns the results as it should have. So far so good.
    For testing use within Web Intelligence, I have created the following Single Sign On (SSO) universes: a)directly on the cube, b)via a "select all" query and finally c)via a filtered query (filtering the exact allowed values of analysis authorization of the test user). All of the above have unfortunately the exact same issues:
    When a test user with limited analysis authorization (i.e. a user that can only access value "A" of Company Code) tries to view a report on either of these universes, then the result is the following message when trying to execute the query "A database error occured. The database error text is: Error loading cube MyCube/MyQuery (catalog MyCube): Unknown error. (WIS 10901)"
    I have tried several settings on the universe (like filter working on LoV as well) but none helped.
    If we replace the user's analysis authorizations with full access on company code (values "A" and "B") the query runs as it should have.
    Any ideas?
    Best regards
    Giorgos

    Hi,
    has the Universe been created on the cube level or on the query level ?
    In case it is on the cube level it will fail because :
    Analysis authorizations are not based on authorization objects. Instead, you create authorizations that include a group of characteristics. You restrict the values for these characteristics.
    The authorizations can include any authorization-relevant characteristics, and treat single values, intervals, and hierarchy authorizations in the same way. Navigation attributes can also be flagged as authorization-relevant in the attribute maintenance for characteristics and can be added to authorizations as separate characteristics.
    You can then assign this authorization to one or more users.
    All characteristics flagged as authorization-relevant are checked when a query is executed.
    *A query always selects a set of data from the database. If authorization-relevant characteristics are part of this data, you have to make sure that the user who is executing the query has sufficient authorization for the complete selection. Otherwise, an error message is displayed indicating that the authorization is not sufficient. In principle, the authorizations do not work as filters. Very restricted exceptions to this rule are hierarchies in the drilldown and variables that are filled depending on authorizations. Hierarchies are mostly restricted to the authorized nodes, and variables that are filled depending on authorizations act like filters for the authorized values for the particular characteristic*
    Ingo

  • Impact of Analysis Authorization on Users using old Authorization

    Hi All,
    I have question regarding Analysis Authorization. Our system has old authorization concept and as part of our project we decided to go for Analysis authorization for Cost Center object. We activated analysis authorization for cost center, assigned it to test user id and found that its working fine in Dev. But it has impacted other users in the system. They are not able to access any other reports and data providers which were not even referring cost center. What is the proper way to activate analysis authorization without impacting access to existing users.
    - Som

    Hello Andreas,
    Sorry to ask you directly here, I didn't get answer from this forum. We will migrate to the new analysis authorization from old reporting concept. I have read the book "An Expert guide to new SAP BI security features" by SAP Lavs, but still confused with some parts. My questions is:
    Are there two ways to create authorizations as follows?
    1. we can type tcode rsecadmin>Maintence button>create a new authorization.
    2. the following part taken from the book:
    Steps for Generating Authorizations
    1. Activate Business content
    2. Load Datastore objects
    3. Generate Authorizations
    4. View Generation Log.
    In the first step, OTCA_DS01 to OTCA_DS05 and OCCA_O01 to OCCA_O03 are Datastore objects required to be activated.
    In the second step, tcode rsecadmin-->generation button --> type OTCA_SDS01 to OTCA_DS05 into respective filed. Should we always type these 5 objects everytime when we create authorization?
    When we should use the second way to create authorizations? and what is the diffrence between them?
    Any answers will be appreciated. Thank you very much in advance!
    Haifeng

  • Issue w RSCUSTV23 Analysis Authorization System after upg from BW3.5 to BI7

    We set it to "Obsolete Concept with RSR Authorization Objects" and we do no understand why from the suddenly changes to
    "Current Procedure with Analysis Authorization" from no where - any ideas why from the sudden this changes by itself?
    still were not not migrating our security to the new version...we will do it around april...but in the meanwhile i would like ot understand why is happening by itself.
    thanks,

    Note that the logging will probably only help you if you activate it in the transport tool profiles (STMS) as it sounds to me as if imports of the customizing are making this setting.
    Did you set the value in DEV and transport it through or did you use one of the "BW utility reports" to change it (in which case you do not always have change documents and inconsistent customizing is "by design"...).
    Cheers,
    Julius

  • SAP R/3 System analysis

    Hello!
    Before the upgrade from R/3 4.6C to ECC 6.0 I would like to execute SAP R/3 system analysis.
    The following functions should be included in this program:
    - detailed analysis of system modifications (effort driver and risk factor during an Upgrade)
    - comparison against a SAP ERP 6.0 reference system
    - extension SAP tools, including RBE and conflict lists (SPAU/SPDD)
    - syntax analysis of program code with respect of adjustement need
    - quality control of own development
    - control of amount of transports within different company areas
    - control of user information, such a user type, logon date, etc.
    - basic control, whether a sufficient authorization concept is available
    - Identification of objects that should be considered for the archiving in oder to decrease the db-size
    My question are:
    <b>- which tasks can be convered with SAP standard transactions what are the names of the transactions?
    - which effort do I investigate for these tasks?</b>
    Thank you very much!
    regards

    Dear Thom,
    To know the functionality changes u can refer http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/
    http://www.sap.com/solutions/business-suite/erp/pdf/BWP_ERP2006_Upgrade.pdf
    http://service.sap.com/releasenotes and http://service.sap.com/upgrade for functional changes.
    Need to consider the following things:
    For Reports…it’s custom developed program …so unless there is any kind of change in requirement from the client regarding the layout…nothing needs to be changed…I think it will work fine in ECC 6.0 to…except few things may needs to be changed..so you need to discuss whether they want the reorts as it is right now…or want to change the layout (adding some new info/fields etc) of any report…so u need to modify the program for those…and estimate accordingly…for a medium complexity’s Report dev it takes approx 9 pd (FRSTDSCoding+Unit Testing)…so to modify it will be less than that (depending upon the scope of changes)
    Now say for Batch Inputs(interface/Data Migration) using BDC…you need to see how many BDCs are there…again if the field lengths and layouts are not changing…then no need to change anything (except the main thing…..you need to change the obsolete function modules…there are some in 4.6 c like for data upload ws_upload_*** is there 4.6C but obsolete in ECC6.0…there are some new with enhanced functionality so you need to modify the BDCs…and many cases it happens that the whole transaction screen changes for process…in that case better to develop new BDCs…so you have to consider those parameter…look into and estimate accordingly…modifying a BDC should not take more than 1 PD…
    Now say for Forms…there was no Smart form in 4.6C…form printer was there..though the same option is there in ECC 6.0 too..but better to go for/should go for Smart form…in that case…it’s complete new dev…so estimate accordingly…a medium complexity’s form should take 8 PD (FRSTDSCoding+Unit Testing)…you can take it as 10 PD too…even if client wants to keep it is as it was in older version…you have to redevelop the layout in ECC 6.0 again…as form printer is even client dependent…maximum you can copy the program associated with that form in the new version too…and your effort will be saved…again you have to consider if clients wants to change the layout too…
    Now for enhancement…so in that case u need to see individual cases…for a medium complexity enhancement it should take max 15 PD (FRSTDSCoding+Unit Testing)…
    One more important thing is that the Unicode Compatibility…this needs to be done….needs to change the code (variable name) accordingly….also Version management tool is used for the standard programs…
    Also pls find the following forums:
    Re: Data Migration from 4.6C to ECC 6.0
    List of transations supported in SAP 4.6c and not in ECC6.0
    Re: Upgradation from 4.6C to ECC  6.0
    Re: what's the advantage to upgrade 4.6c to ECC5.0...
    RE: Help required regarding to upgrade from R/3 4.6c to mySAp ERP 2005
    Upgrade batch inputs from 4.6C to mySAP ERP 2005
    /thread/317225 [original link is broken]
    Upgrade from SAP R/3 to ECC 6.0
    Hope it will help you.
    Thanks,
    Atin
    <b><b>Reward points if it helps.</b></b>

  • SAP R/3 System analysis before upgrade 4.6C -- SAP ECC 6.0

    Hello!
    Before the upgrade from R/3 4.6C to ECC 6.0 I would like to execute SAP R/3 system analysis.
    The following functions should be included in this program:
    - detailed analysis of system modifications (effort driver and risk factor during an Upgrade)
    - comparison against a SAP ERP 6.0 reference system
    - extension SAP tools, including RBE and conflict lists (SPAU/SPDD)
    - syntax analysis of program code with respect of adjustement need
    - quality control of own development
    - control of amount of transports within different company areas
    - control of user information, such a user type, logon date, etc.
    - basic control, whether a sufficient authorization concept is available
    - Identification of objects that should be considered for the archiving in oder to decrease the db-size
    My question are:
    - which tasks can be convered with SAP standard transactions what are the names of the transactions?
    - which effort do I investigate for these tasks?
    Thank you very much!
    regards

    Dear Thom,
    To know the functionality changes u can refer http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/
    http://www.sap.com/solutions/business-suite/erp/pdf/BWP_ERP2006_Upgrade.pdf
    http://service.sap.com/releasenotes and  http://service.sap.com/upgrade  for functional changes.
    Need to consider the following things:
    For Reports…it’s custom developed program …so unless there is any kind of change in requirement from the client regarding the layout…nothing needs to be changed…I think it will work fine in ECC 6.0 to…except few things may needs to be changed..so you need to discuss whether they want the reorts as it is right now…or want to change the layout (adding some new info/fields etc) of any report…so u need to modify the program for those…and estimate accordingly…for a medium complexity’s Report dev it takes approx 9 pd (FRSTDSCoding+Unit Testing)…so to modify it will be less than that (depending upon the scope of changes)
    Now say for Batch Inputs(interface/Data Migration) using BDC…you need to see how many BDCs are there…again if the field lengths and layouts are not changing…then no need to change anything (except the main thing…..you need to change the obsolete function modules…there are some in 4.6 c like for data upload ws_upload_*** is there 4.6C but obsolete in ECC6.0…there are some new with enhanced functionality so you need to modify the BDCs…and many cases it happens that the whole transaction screen changes for process…in that case better to develop new BDCs…so you have to consider those parameter…look into and estimate accordingly…modifying a BDC should not take more than 1 PD…
    Now say for Forms…there was no Smart form in 4.6C…form printer was there..though the same option is there in ECC 6.0 too..but better to go for/should go for Smart form…in that case…it’s complete new dev…so estimate accordingly…a medium complexity’s form should take 8 PD (FRSTDSCoding+Unit Testing)…you can take it as 10 PD too…even if client wants to keep it is as it was in older version…you have to redevelop the layout in ECC 6.0 again…as form printer is even client dependent…maximum you can copy the program associated with that form in the new version too…and your effort will be saved…again you have to consider if clients wants to change the layout too…
    Now for enhancement…so in that case u need to see individual cases…for a medium complexity enhancement it should take max 15 PD (FRSTDSCoding+Unit Testing)…
    One more important thing is that the Unicode Compatibility…this needs to be done….needs to change the code (variable name) accordingly….also Version management tool is used for the standard programs…
    Also pls find the following forums:
    Re: Data Migration from 4.6C to ECC 6.0
    List of transations supported in SAP 4.6c and not in ECC6.0
    Re: Upgradation from 4.6C to ECC  6.0
    Re: what's the advantage to upgrade 4.6c to ECC5.0...
    RE: Help required regarding to upgrade from R/3 4.6c to mySAp ERP 2005
    Upgrade batch inputs from 4.6C to mySAP ERP 2005
    /thread/317225 [original link is broken]
    Upgrade from SAP R/3 to ECC 6.0
    Hope it will help you.
    Thanks,
    Atin
    <b><b>Reward points if it helps.</b></b>

  • CALL_FUNCTION_SINGLE_LOGIN_REJ- No authorization to log on as a Trusted System (L- RC=1 T-RC=1).

    Hi All,
    i have created a trusted connection(say system A_100 and B_100,---100 is a client) as per SAP note 128447 - Trusted/trusting systems
    I have all required authorisation i.e s_rfcacl,S_rfc ,s_rfc_tt.
    i am able to remote logon from system B_100 to system A_100 ,but issue in when i try to logon from system A_100 to system B_100.
    error is -
    No authorization to log on as a Trusted System (L- RC=1 T-RC=1).
    i can see run time error in system B_100 as with user SAPSYS and client 000(why it is showing this user and client )
    CALL_FUNCTION_SINGLE_LOGIN_REJ
    Details-
    Category               Installation Errors
    Runtime Errors         CALL_FUNCTION_SINGLE_LOGIN_REJ
    Date and Time          08.08.2014 09:07:04
    Short text
         No authorization to log on as a Trusted System (L-RC=1 T-RC=1).
    What happened?
         The current program had to be terminated because of an
         error when installing the R/3 System.
    What can you do?
         Note which actions and input led to the error.
         For further help in handling the problem, contact your SAP administrator
         You can use the ABAP dump analysis transaction ST22 to view and manage
         termination messages, in particular for long term reference.
    Error analysis
         An RFC call (Remote Function Call) was send with an invalid user ID
         "XXXX " or the caller system is not registered as a Trusted System in the
         target system.
    Information on where terminated
        Termination occurred in the ABAP program "SAPMSSY1" - in
         "REMOTE_FUNCTION_CALL".
        The main program was "SAPMSSY1 ".
        In the source code you have the termination point in line 113
        of the (Include) program "SAPMSSY1".
    Source Code Extract
    Line  SourceCde
       83   COMMUNICATION SEND ID convid BUFFER header.
       84   IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
       85     PERFORM (sy-xform) IN PROGRAM (sy-xprog).
       86   ELSE.
       87     MESSAGE a800.
       88   ENDIF.
       89 ENDFORM.                    "cpic_call
       90
       91 *&---------------------------------------------------------------------*
       92 *&      Form  remote_function_call
       93 *&---------------------------------------------------------------------*
       94 *       text
       95 *----------------------------------------------------------------------*
       96 *      -->VALUE      text
       97 *      -->(TYPE)     text
       98 *----------------------------------------------------------------------*
       99 FORM remote_function_call USING value(type).
      100   DATA rc             TYPE i VALUE 0.
      101   DATA: l_syxform     TYPE syxform,
      102         l_syxprog     TYPE syxprog,
      103         l_cbe         TYPE i.
      104
      105 * necessary variables for class based exceptions
      106   DATA: l_root        TYPE REF TO cx_root.
      107
      108   DO.
    109 *
    110 * with ID 'CLException' we determine, whether the caller is
    111 * class based excptions or not
    112 *
    >>>>     CALL 'RfcImport' ID 'Type'        FIELD type
    114                      ID 'SYXForm'     FIELD l_syxform
    115                      ID 'SYXProg'     FIELD l_syxprog
    116                      ID 'CLException' FIELD l_cbe.
    117
    118     IF l_syxprog = 'JAVA'.
    119       SYSTEM-CALL plugin
    120                   ID 'JAVA' VALUE 'FORW_JAVA'
    121                   ID 'RC'   VALUE RC.
    122 *   if there is no rollout on the JAVA side which
    123 *   rolls both, JAVA and ABAP, we return to the
    124 *   C-Stack and reach this point
    125
    126 *   in case there was an rollout, the ABAP-C stack is lost
    127 *   and we jump direkt to this point
    128
    129 *   here we trigger the rollout on this Abap side with
    130 *   the following statement
    131       SYSTEM-CALL plugin
    132                   ID 'JAVA' VALUE 'ROLL_OUT'
    I have also referred sap note-1627901 - Trusted RFC troubleshooting
    No luck.
    Do let me know if additional information is needed .
    Kind Regards,
    Sumit

    Hi Sumit
    1.  Is this both system Support pack level are same?
    2. As you said that you SAP_Basis 7.31 - support package level?
    3. Have you check the SAP note 128447 - Trusted/trusting systems they are given ABAP runtime correction  2021691 - CALL_FUNCTION_SINGLE_LOGIN_REJ and trusted RC=1
    4.
    one question -  why it is working in system B and not in system A.
    Its may be software bug for that they give ABAP runtime correction
    Regards
    Sriram

Maybe you are looking for

  • Refresh Data in an Excel Workbook from another Excel file

    I have an Excel file that I need to use as a data source for a report that is generated from another Excel Workbook that I am using PowerPivot and PowerPivot with. I make the connections and everything works fine, but the schedule to refresh doesn't

  • Oracle 9ias wireless libraries Please help me!!!1

    i have downloaded jwe prerelease version.After i did required steps but i still can't use oracle.wireless.me.sql,soda,push,lbs,yplite libraries what must i do?Please help me

  • Change image size of 42HL800A

    Hi, I am having trouble changing the size of my tv image so that it fills the entire screen. Currently I am watching satellite TV through a set top box that is connected to the 42HL800A. There always seem to be two bars of 'blackness' on either side

  • Help with button/action script

    As part of a class I have to create an aquarium where I have pictures of fish on the side and I want to be able to click on the fish and have it add the fish to the aquarium. I want to be able to have the viewer select the number and types of fish th

  • Could not find bridge, and none was specified,

    Starting operation 'Virtual Machine Start' on object '0004fb0000060000a635ac3c095007e4 (DB10g)' Job Internal Error (Operation)com.oracle.ovm.mgr.api.exception.FailedOperationException: OVMAPI_4010E Attempt to send command: start_vm to server: host1.e