SAP calculates % incorrect for PO and SO Conditions

When creating a PO or SO the Conditions at item level (both discounts and extra charges) related to % are calculated incorrect.
If the user enters a discount of 10% the system calculates a discount of 1% and if the user enters 100% the discount calculated becomes 10%. (10% of $100 becomes $1 not $10)
This error appears for all Conditions related to % so I assume the configuration of the Conditions are of a more global nature.
Both our Development and Test systems are working fine.
Any ideas?

Stephen,
Thanks for your swift reply.
OSS has been consulted however they defined this as a configuration issue.
I do not agree in their judgment however this is where it stands now and hence I have posted this tread.
The Production System is not open for configuration so this is a real mystery to me.
I believe that if someone by accident did a bad config in Test and Development this error should also be found in these systems and not only in the Production System.
We are using a standard SAP Price Calculation Schema - RM0000 and all Conditions are standard SAP conditions both for PO and SO.
Kind regards,
Are

Similar Messages

SAP BPC RDS FOR SALES AND OPERATION

Hi
i just need a link to download sap RDS BPC for sales and operation planning

Hi Elhoussiny,
Refer below link may be helpful.
SAP Service Marketplace - Analytics - EPM
Shrikant

What is the condition class for vat and cst condition types.

HI friends,
when we go for taxinn (i.e. tax calculation by using condition type not on the formula base), what is the tax class we use for VAT and CST condition types (D or A).
thanks
nitchel

Dera Nitchel,
For CST / VAT in TAXINN use Condition Class as D (Taxes) & also Condition Category as D (Tax).
HOpe this helps...
Reward if useful...
Thanks,
Jignesh Mehta
98700 10230

How does SAP calculate tax for employees who pay SFSS(Australia)?

Hi,
Good day. How does SAP calculate tax for employees who pay SFSS (Student Financial Supplement Scheme). The EE is under tax scale 7 - No Leave Loading. Please advise. Thank you.

hai..
check QTAX sub schema

Why doesn't SAP use SAPUI5 for this and that

This is my personal opinion about this topic! Again and again I stumble about this and now I want to share some of my thoughts about this topic. I want to share this from a point of view, when I was not a SAP Employee - I worked at a SAP Partner company - because this best reflects the view from the outside.
1. SAP "wants" us to use SAPUI5
I don't think that "wants" is the right word - the right word is offers! In terms of: hey now even included in your license and open sourced (because you wanted it so). Look - we build sooo many Fiori apps with it - and put in some great enterprise features (right to left, accessibility, translation, ...) and it is responsive. So if you want to build Fiori-like "apps" - there you go - this is your technology to go! This is what I understood.
I was very very very happy that it was build with open standards. But the main point for me another thing - (because I worked with Sybase Unwired Platform and SAP Mobile Platform) OMG an open data protocol!!! OData FTW! I could use ANY front-end technology and consume SAP data - the protocol is REST based - a dream came true. And so I did - yes I played around with Sencha Touch and OData, I used data.js and used it in a standard HTML5 application. We played around with an iOS application we already had and consumed the data. I feed the data into d3.js. I prototyped around with SAPUI5 and I have build apps with it. Brilliant, so I could choose whatever UI technology I wanted.
I always had the feeling, that SAPUI5 was meant for B2E applications - and building many of that - and they should look and feel the same and I can theme the apps. I can use it when I want to make my applications SAP like - so that the user thinks the apps are all the same and everything fits nicely into the Fiori launchpad - great if you want to build partner apps. In my ex company we won a SAP Pinnacle Award - for a native iOS app, no SAPUI5 in sight - but we have received an award, so SAP did not "want us" to use SAPUI5 ;-)
2. Is it the right UI technology for everything?
At my ex-company I was dealing with mobile applications and web apps. I always knew that I get the best user experience when I write a real native application and if you want it to look like in a very specific way with awesome UI --> you would not do it with a write-once-run-everywhere HTML5 super-styled wrapped (phone gap/cordova) app - you would write the apps for the specific platform and it should feel like it was written for the platform. SAP offered us the SAP Fiori Client that I could enhance the user experience for the Fiori apps, but I was never told to use SAPUI5 it for everything.
The same discussion goes on with: why was the new SAP website not build with SAPUI5, or the UX Explorer (eat your own dog food), or a useful internal app - why Angular, or the other way around why do we even use SAPUI5 and not Angular JS itself. Back to the past - SAP did never tell me to build a website with it, or to build something tiny and small with it (a widget) - or to enhance parts of a website with it - or to build something super-specific with it.
And yes maybe the UI in a mobile app was not SAPUI5 but do you know if it uses Gateway with OData or the SAP Mobile Platform, was the API managed with Apigee, was HCI involved in getting the data from different sources, was it maybe wrapped with SAP Mobile Secure, did it maybe use a HANA backend or some of its features (predictions, text analytics, ...) - are some backend parts maybe hosted on HCP - who knows? So yeah, maybe other SAP technology was involved which you don't see, but in the end it made your life simpler.
Instead of arguing around why this and that was used for this and that - can we save our energy and instead look at the result - which is all what counts - that it was the right UI technology with the right user interface which makes the user happy? I stated something like - does Google use AngularJS for everything? Nope. They offer us something great we can use. Right, maybe AngularJS is not as important for Google like SAPUI5 is for us. But we have something with which we can build our day-to-day business apps with and we do so.
3. We missed great opportunity in not using SAPUI5 for this and that
Let's think about how projects are going: you want something, you look at the costs, you choose most efficient option. Yes this could mean reusing an existing native application which was written long ago and you pimped it up. Or you had outsourced it to a company which wrote a similar app. Or you bought the source code. Or you have some cheap internal staff which could do it (students, trainee), or you could outsource it cheaply. Or all you have is people with experience in this and that technology. Or it must look in a very very specific way (because marketing says so) and you go native. Or it maybe should even differentiate itself and should look NOT like a Fiori app. And no - I don't think - this is my employees view - we are not for example an event app producer. We normally build business applications. And I don't think that we can write an app from scratch "just" for an event in a certain technology. Yes it would be nice if this and that would use SAPUI5, I think if it would be possible in terms of time and costs and UI wishes and hundreds of other factors we would do it with SAPUI5.
Working at the partner SAP showed me over 50 Fiori apps, now hundreds of Fiori apps are released. SAP now showed that SAPUI5 is going big with S/4HANA. We have seen the Simple Finance solution. I was walking around at the CeBIT this year and I was impressed myself which cool apps and screens have been shown with SAPUI5. I used the SAPUI5 app on a Samsung Smart Watch myself. The SAP Web IDE itself is built with SAPUI5 in its heart. I don't need any other "proves" that SAPUI5 is great. I have seen great use cases for it, but I also know myself when I would use other stuff.
4. My conclusion
There is never every anything which can cover all different use cases. One-size-fits-all clothes also does not fit for everyone even if it says so. If someone creates something great don't judge it by the UI technology. Judge it by the experience and the value it creates. There are reasons why this and that was chosen. Use what fits your needs best with your requirements. Make the end user happy!

Hey Denise,
Thanks for pulling this discussion into SCN. Makes it much easier to discuss compared to Twitter. But I also have to apologize in the beginning that my answer now exceeds 140 characters by 50 times.
Let me share my thoughts and personal opinion as well. I will try to look at it from a strategic point of view, as you – as the technical UI5 expert - have already covered the technical perspective.
SAP recommends using SAPUI5 where it fits to customers’ requirements
Let me begin with a clear statement from my perspective: It makes no sense that SAP takes customer decisions.
Of course, customers expect SAP to help them with their strategies and decisions and of course we are helping. But at the end, the decisions have to be taken by the customer who needs to take the specific conditions of the company into account. The most important condition in the context of UX is the end user. But we shouldn't forget the business strategy as the most important influence factor. I’m not saying that technical decisions are completely unimportant, but I would like to point out that other things are more important for a company.
As a result, it wouldn't make a lot of sense if SAP would just want every customer to use SAPUI5. To me, customers need recommendations leading to solutions that satisfy their needs and requirements.
There is not that one UI technology that serves all needs
This headline might be a challenging statement and I can already imagine reactions to it. But in fact I can confirm this sentence easily. You always have to combine different technologies. Some of them are from SAP others not. The selection and combination of these technologies is different from customer to customer because the requirements are different. There are still reasons to use Web Dynpro ABAP and I’m still recommending SAP NetWeaver Business Client, POWL (Power Lists), WDA Chips, FPM based on the given environment of the customer. And obviously there are also reasons for UI5.
SAP already proves the usage of SAPUI5
In general, I see two different use cases here: Developing custom applications vs. adopting applications from SAP.
In the one case, customers want recommendations on development environments and UI technologies that consider their development requirements and existing conditions (e.g. existing skills, given implementations). SAPUI5 is a great UI technology and there are some special aspects that make the decision obviously easy. If I want to create simple business applications that can be connected with my SAP system easily, especially in combination under responsive conditions on multiple devices and targeted for casual and/or occasional users UI5 might be the right choice for many. Exactly this pattern is what many customers are searching for these days. So, the recommendation for UI5 comes quite often.
Whether or not SAP proves the usage of SAPUI5 in their own world is to me more connected to the use case where customers want to adopt SAP applications. And in deed, SAP is using SAPUI5. There are hundreds of SAP Fiori applications that have been built with SAPUI5 and there have been a lot of other applications developed using SAPUI5, too. And again, there is a huge need for applications for casual and/or occasional users, so that’s a big reason for SAP to create such applications.
Websites vs. Business Applications
This discussion was triggered by some statements in twitter, that SAP sites such as sap.com, SAP UX Explorer or the latest mobile conference app are not developed using UI5. Actually I see these to be websites but not business applications. I have never told a customer to build a website in UI5 and I would continue to do so.
Maybe we need to discuss the difference between a website and a business application. I guess it is not easy to find a common understanding here, as the borderlines between several worlds have disappeared in the last years.
Some years ago it was more or less easy to differ between:
Native desktop applications running on a specific desktop OS
Native mobile applications running on a specific mobile OS
Browser-based applications running in specific browsers
Websites, basically running on many browsers
In the first three categories we saw business applications. 1 and 2 were selected especially when specific functions of the device and OS where needed to be accessed (for example the camera of the mobile device, the fast rendering capability of the desktop). 3 was also used for business applications but in most cases on desktop browsers.
Today, one can develop browser-based applications that look like native applications and even can access the devices like native applications. Responsive design breaks the borderlines even more. Now, browser-based content can be rendered perfectly on a desktop browser as well as on a mobile phone and a user might even not be able to judge whether it was originally intended to be developed for the one or the other.
So maybe there is no big difference anymore between websites and browser-based applications. But there is still a difference between browser-based applications and browser-based business applications, where additional requirements such as integration into business systems are drivers. Here I see SAPUI5 as a very cool UI technology.
That’s just my 2 (personal) cents,
JJ

SAP Query error for VBAK and KONV tables

Dear Experts,
Want to create SAP Query for below requirement but faced some error
Step1) Extract the data from VBAK table w.r.t. order type , Sale org and date range
and collected the Sales order numbers and doc. condition record (KNUMV)
Step 2)In table KONV (Transactional condition record data) in this table provided input as doc. condition record (KNUMV) with respect to condition type ABCD
Manually i extracted data, there is no problem .
But customer want to generate SAP Query for above requirement
I tried to create but in t.code SQ02 when i tried to join the table VBAK and KONV i faced the below error
Table KONV cannot be used in a join.
How can I create SAP query for above requirement ???
if its not possible then create Z report is the only solution ??????
Thanks in advance

Hello
You can not create Query report with joining KONV. But there is one solution for your problem. You can create Query report by using Database VAV. In this logical database you will find all SD tables and also KONV. Use only those tables and fields which you want in your query report. I have checked this and its working
Please try this and update the forum accordingly.
Edited by: moazzamjii on Jun 30, 2011 12:13 PM

SAP Security Report for single and composite roles

Hi
I have a requirement to create a cutomize report in SAP Security.
I have to display Composite roles,corresponding single roles,the tcodes assigned to those single roles and the description of t- codes. The selection screen has composite roles,single role and T-code which are optional.User can enter selection in any of the selection critreria.How should I go on this?If user gives only composite roles on the selection for e.g 'TEST'. for this role I get suppose 3 child roles 'TEST1' 'TEST2' 'TEST3' from table AGR_AGRS.Now to get the tcodes i go to table 'AR_1251' and I get the tcodes.
But if user give only single role on the selection for eg 'TEST2' ,for this single role 'TEST2' there would be multiple composite roles.for e.g, 'TEST' 'SAP1' 'SAP2' etc..Now if go to get the tcodes for this single role in AGR_1251,I will ceatainly get the tcodes for eg MM01,FB01,etc.But then how would I know whether MM01 belongs to composite role 'TEST' SAP1' or SAP2' for the single role 'TEST2'.
Please advise.
Thanks
Edited by: Julius Bussche on Aug 13, 2009 4:52 PM
Subject title improved

I though of seperate selection options for singles and composites, but you also said:
> But if user give only single role on the selection for eg 'TEST2' ,for this single role 'TEST2' there would be multiple composite roles.
My suggestion would be to build better single roles, but that is just me...
Cheers,
Julius

SAP SD Career for Sales and Marketing Professional in Banking & Insurance Industry

Dear Experts,
I have 8+ years experience in Marketing,Sales and Customer Services in banking and financial service industry. I enquired about SAP courses in authorised SAP centres and they suggested me to go with SAP SD module. I am not sure whether SAP SD will suits to me as it deals with hard core products, but my sales and marketing experience in based on Concept selling. As a marketing guy i have good understanding and knowledge of sales and product life cycle. I have done MCA in 2004, but all experience is into BFSI domain. Now i want to shift into IT. Whether i can take up SAP SD and make a career in it.?.Seeking proper guidance from experts.
Cheers
Ramesh

Hi Ramesh,
You can try to IS-Insurance to suit your domain experience. However, if you look at major SAP Implemented insurance companies adopted SAP ERP and custom according to their need. So, getting a breakthrough in this IS solution would be very hard.
Again, if I come back to your question on BFSI point domain experience. I have my friend who worked in Top 5 BFSI company in India who transitioned his career in SAP SD (studied in SAP Authorized institute and got a job through campus in CMM Level 5 company) because he has BE + MBA. This story was happened 8 years back. But I don't know the current trend in India.
SAP SD is best and it will suit as I saw already a guy went through the same path. Also, check SAP CRM Sales or Service.
You can wait for other members comments who may be transitioned from BFSI sector to SAP to give some ideas.
Best of luck.
Regards
GGOPII

SAP Oracle Support for VM and Hyper V

Dear Friends,
We are planning to do Up gradation and implementation for below application with Oracle Database.
SAP ECC 6.0 additional application server
SAP Portal Development system
SAP Portal Quality system
SAP BI Development system
SAP BI Quality system
Documentation Server /SAP CONTENT SERVER 6.30
SAP Solution Manager 7.1 EHP1 Development System
SAP Solution Manager 7.1 EHP1 Quality System
Which virtualization is suitable for us.? Hyper v or VM
VM does not support from orcle,Still some customers are using.Is it advisable to us VM?
Hyper V supports sap with orcle?
Or can we install all application on 1 single Operating System?
Thanks a lot in Advance
Regards,
Snehal Patel

Thanx Deepak,
As per Note 1329848
All Oracle products (incl. Oracle Database 11.2.x, Oracle RAC 11.2.x, Oracle Client 11.2.x) certified to run on Windows Server 2008 R2 with Service Pack 1 or Windows Server 2012 are also certified to run on these Operating Systems when running as virtual machines under Windows Server 2012 with Hyper-V, whether used in a private cloud or public cloud (including Windows Azure) environment, subject to the exceptions and additional information identified below.
List of Microsoft Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V guest OSes includes:
Windows Server 2012
Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1
Oracle Linux 6.4
As 1173954 - Support of Oracle for VMWare
Oracle has not certified any of its products on VMware virtualized environments. Oracle Support will assist customers running Oracle databases on VMware in the following manner: Oracle will only provide support for issues that either are known to occur on the native OS, or can be demonstrated not to be as a result of running on VMware.
Still Some Customers are using .Is it Advisable to use VM?
One more option proposed by partner:
All DEV/QAS servers for portal,BI,Solman on single server without any VM on Single is Advisable?
Regards,
Snehal Patel

How to find the latest SAP patch release for SRM and BI 7.0?

Hi experts,
I know how to check my sytem patch level in BI 7.0 and SRM. My question is how and where to check the latest patch level on SAP service market place.
Thanks in advance.
Sharat.

Hello,
Goto service.sap.com -> software download -> sap support packages -> Entry by application group -> Sap Frontend components -> SAP GUI for windows
In SAP Frontend components you have patches for BI add-on too.
Assign points if this helps
Regards,
Jorge Diogo

Non-SAP Source systems for gas and power trading operations

Hi Experts, I have this client who has no R/3 systems. They have few MS Access databases, Oracle systems annd MS SQL DB. I have seen some of the most commonly used tables in all the databases and doesn't look like there are not even a single InfoObject that is similar to any one in Business Content. Now this makes me feel that I need create everything from scratch. Can anybosy guide me on the best way to go about extracting data from this non-SAP systems. Right from connecting to these systems to extracting data in BI to creating some meaningful reports.
They do not have the concept of Master data here. All they have is Data in the MS Access databases.I need some assistance from experts here in how do I go about organizing this.

hi,
The BW can be connected to Non-SAP data using DB or UD connect.
The data in Non-SAP source system is staged in form of tables.
You can extract the data using Data Source based on DB or UD connection.you can define new info objects and data flow which extracts the data. In DS description you can mention the Non-SAP source system tables from where you want to extract the data, after that u can mention the fields to be extracted in BW.
regards,
Arvind.

WBS elements for Customers and Vendor, Bank entries....

Hi SAP Guru's,
For revenues and Costs we can trace them thru WBS elements entry in FI at the time of actaul amount sepent.
But for making the Advance payments to Customers and vendors or for any other Capital purpose, How to track the payments projects wise?
in f-29 for f-48, there is no option of giving the WBS elements. Pls help How to the WBS elemts filed Mandotory in FI Documents for all the entries posted in FI for vendor, customer, Banks accounts also?

Hi,
This is possible if you configure posting down payment in CO. You do it via OKEP transaction. The, after checking that you have configured number ranges (KANK), you can reconstruct your down payments in WBS via OKBG. You can see this customization steps under: Project Systems - Costs - Actual Costs - Update Down Payments.
Regards,
Eli

MAP for Finished and Semi Finished goods

Dear Friends,
Please let me know;
1. If Finished and Semi finsihed goods are maintained with price indicator 'S' and all are inhouse production then SAP updata moving average price or these material or not ?
2. If SAP updata MAP for finished and semi-finished, later can we change map manually or not ? if yes How ?
3. Is there any way to stop updata of map by sap in case of finsihed and semifinished goods.
Actually according to my product costing variant, I dont need any price in map of FG and SFG. Kindly give me your expert openion on this issue.
Thanks
Ravi

Hi
1. If you maintain price control S for inhouse produced finished product also, system updates moving average price with resepect stock and value of production (may be period wise production cost may be varying). But this is statistical.
2. You can change price control from S to V if you require. You need to change first in material type and then change in material master.
3. If the value is getting updated also it will have no impact. In case of product cost variant also it will get updated.
Thanks

SAP Best Practices for Payroll

Hi Gurus,
We have a SAP ECC6.0 version installed at our client side. My Client is developing a software for SAP Payroll. They want to run Payroll in their SAP system to figure out few things. SAP has recommended to install SAP Best Practices for HCM to get some test data. My questions to you all are:-
1) SAP best Practices do provide preconfigured settings and some amount of Test Data. How will I install SAP Best Practices for HCM at my client System. Please do tell me in detail because I dont have any knowledge how to proceed as I a SAP HCM functional consultant. We dont have any basis consultant in our team.
2) How long it can take to install SAP Best Practices for HCM and the complete proceedure to do it?
3) Is it true that the test data provided by SAP BP and the pre configured base settings will be sufficient to run Payroll. Mind it,my client does not want to run payroll as per their needs,they just want to see how it is run in SAP with the SAP test data.
I would really appreciate if you guyz can provide me any knowledge related to this matter.
Thanks a ton
Sanchit Gupta

Friend
You should visit www.service.sap.com (you need login and passwd ) and search under EUROPE.
or try in www.help.sap.com.
Regards
Renu

Tax Conditions for Sales and Distribution using Jurisdiction Code in Canada

Hello everyone,
I would like to share with you a doubt relating taxes for Sales and Distribution in Canada.
The Tax conditions for Sales and Distribution in Canada are the CTX1 (GST - Canada), CTX2 (PST - Canada) and CTX3 (Base + GST). These are the Tax Conditions which appear when creating a Material or a Client for the Canada Region, and are also the ones included in the Canada Standandard Pricing Procedure.
I tried to apply the standard method of creating a Master Record for these conditions, but an error relating the Jurisdiction Code came out while releasing to accounting.
Does anyone one how to procceed? Which are the important issues with Finance Accounting to take in to account?
I would really appreciate any comment relating this issue.
Thank you very much in advanced.
Víctor

Dear Mr. Lakshmipathi,
In first place, thank you very much for your quick response.
I have tried many different procedures to get the aim, and among others, a new access sequence was created to allow the introduction of the Jurisdiction Code (UTXJ is not available for Sales Conditions) but once the Condition is created, it is not recognized when creating the Order ("pricing error: Mandatory condition CTX is missing"). Maybe it has something to do with the fact that these conditions are not included in the Finance Accounting Tax Procedure, where the conditions, which represent the same taxes but with different condition names, are defined for a certain Tax Code and Jurisdiction code.
Among the different SAP notes for the error relating the Jurisdiction code, there was one proposing to change the Condition Category from "D" (Taxes) to a value between "1 and 4". By doing this a new error appears while creating the order, saying that there are conditions in the Tax procedure (JRC1, JRC2)which are not included in the Sales Pricing procedure. By including this conditions in the Pricing procedure, the Tax Conditions existing in the Finance Accounting Tax Procedure are brought to the Order Conditions, in addition to the Sales Tax Conditions. And there is something more, each Tax Condition from the Finance Accounting Procedure appears twice, one with the application V (Sales) with value zero, and one with application TX (Taxes) with the value existing in the Finance Accounting Taxes Procedure. This is how at the end, the corresponding %value of the taxes is brought to the Invoice with the correct Tax Code, and the proper Jurisdiction Code, which is different for each condition.
Thank you very much for your time.
Víctor Liedo

SAP calculates % incorrect for PO and SO Conditions

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for